Cited by 380Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 120 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The Addictive Dimensionality of Obesity

Open access
Volkow, Nora D., Wang, Gene-Jack, Tomasi, Dardo, Baler, Ruben D.·2013·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Our brains are hardwired to respond and seek immediate rewards. Thus, it is not surprising that many people overeat, which in some can result in obesity, whereas others take drugs, which in some can result in addiction. Though food intake and body weight are under homeostatic regulation, when highly palatable food is available, the ability to resist the urge to eat hinges on self-control. There is no homeostatic regulator to check the intake of drugs (including alcohol); thus, regulation of drug consumption is mostly driven by self-control or unwanted effects (i.e., sedation for alcohol). Disruption in both the neurobiological processes that underlie sensitivity to reward and those that underlie inhibitory control can lead to compulsive food intake in some individuals and compulsive drug intake in others. There is increasing evidence that disruption of energy homeostasis can affect the reward circuitry and that overconsumption of rewarding food can lead to changes in the reward circuitry that result in compulsive food intake akin to the phenotype seen with addiction. Addiction research has produced new evidence that hints at significant commonalities between the neural substrates underlying the disease of addiction and at least some forms of obesity. This recognition has spurred a healthy debate to try and ascertain the extent to which these complex and dimensional disorders overlap and whether or not a deeper understanding of the crosstalk between the homeostatic and reward systems will usher in unique opportunities for prevention and treatment of both obesity and drug addiction.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that obesity and addiction share neurobiological substrates—especially dopamine pathways—while also involving unique processes, so food reward is best viewed as a dimensional component of obesity rather than proof that obesity is food addiction. It synthesizes genetic, molecular, neurocircuitry, and behavioral overlaps to suggest that addiction prevention and treatment strategies may inform obesity interventions.

Key findings

  • A genome-wide association study in 249,796 individuals of European descent identified 32 loci associated with BMI, but these explained only 1.5% of BMI variance. Candidate overlapping genes include DRD2 Taq I A1, CNR1, and the OPRM1 A118G polymorphism, linked to addiction, obesity risk, binge-eating, or alcoholism.
  • Homeostatic and reward systems interact: VTA/NAc neurons express receptors for GLP-1, ghrelin, leptin, insulin, orexin, and melanocortins; orexigenic signals increase VTA DA cell activity to food stimuli, while anorexigenic signals inhibit DA firing and decrease DA release. Human data cited include an inverse relationship between BMI and illicit drug use, lower risk for substance use disorders in obese individuals, and increased risk for alcohol abuse/alcoholism relapse after bariatric surgery.
  • Both addicted and obese subjects show blunted reward-circuit activation during consumption but sensitized responses to conditioned cues. Obese individuals viewing high-calorie food showed increased activation in NAc, dorsal striatum, OFC, ACC, amygdala, hippocampus, and insula; reduced striatal D2R availability is reported in addiction and obesity and is associated with decreased prefrontal activity.
  • The insula is implicated in food, cocaine, and cigarette cravings; gastric distention activates the posterior insula, but lean—not obese—subjects showed amygdala activation and anterior insula deactivation. The extended amygdala, corticotropin-releasing factor signaling, and habenula are proposed to contribute to stress reactivity and the “dark side” transition in addiction and possibly food addiction.

Methods

  • Narrative review and conceptual synthesis, not a systematic review or primary study. It integrates preclinical animal models and human genetic, imaging, and clinical evidence.
  • The main analysis argues that homeostatic and reward systems interact, with dopamine as a common substrate across mesoaccumbens/mesolimbic, mesostriatal, and mesocortical pathways. It proposes a “bowtie”/nested layered architecture model in which the DA system subserves hypothalamic internal signals.
  • Specific evidence cited includes a GWAS of 249,796 individuals, human PET/fMRI studies, rodent feeding and drug-reward experiments, and clinical observations such as bariatric surgery outcomes.

Limitations

  • The authors state they do not claim obesity is the result of food addiction, but rather that food reward plays a critical role in overeating and obesity, referring to it as the dimensional component of obesity. They also note that the extent of overlap remains debated, that it is unclear whether obesogenic diets decrease striatal D2R, and that the extent of similar direct/indirect pathway regulatory processes in obesity remains unclear.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not use a systematic search or quantitative synthesis, and many cited findings are correlational or from animal models, so causal direction and human generalizability are not fully established.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.12.020

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 120 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 68 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 55
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 10
60 of 60

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Cited study does not match the described preclinical finding

    Minor

    The text cites reference 47 for a preclinical finding about decreased VTA dopamine activity and increased food consumption. Reference 47 is titled as a study of reward-system activation in obese women viewing food pictures, not a preclinical study of dopamine activity or consumption.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 114 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 379

Metadata

Authors
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G.-J., Tomasi, D., & Baler, R. D.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Volkow, Nora D.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
73
Issue
9
Pages
811-818
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981784954
Cited by
380
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 14
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (ZIAAA000550)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
obesity, addiction, compulsive eating, reward systems, energy homeostasis, self-control, inhibitory control, palatable food, drug addiction, neural correlates
MeSH terms
Compulsive Behavior, Dopamine, Eating, Homeostasis, Humans, Obesity, Reward, Behavior, Addictive, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review