Cited by 364Seaweed-derived Bioactive CompoundsPolysaccharides Composition and ApplicationsPolysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 89 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Polysaccharides from macroalgae: Recent advances, innovative technologies and challenges in extraction and purification

Open access
Garcia-Vaquero, M., Rajauria, G., O'Doherty, J.V., Sweeney, T.·2017·Food Research International

Abstract

Polysaccharides obtained from macroalgae have promising prospects and could contribute greatly to the future of a marine based bio-economy. Specifically, laminarin and fucoidan from brown macroalgae have a wide variety of potential industrial applications including functional foods and nutraceuticals, due to their broad range of biological activities. These beneficial biological activities are related to the chemical composition and structure of the macroalgal polysaccharides. The molecular weight, monosaccharide composition and sulphate content of these polysaccharides could be influenced by both macroalgal biology (i.e. variations in polysaccharide composition due to macroalgae species and their biological cycle) and different extraction/purification techniques employed to obtain polysaccharide enriched products (i.e. de-sulphation or fragmentation of sulphated polysaccharides). This review focuses on the extraction and purification methods for the macroalgal polysaccharides laminarin and fucoidan used in the recent literature. The application of innovative extraction technologies (such as ultrasound, microwave and enzyme-assisted extractions), as well as new purification techniques (i.e. membrane separation), are also discussed together with the challenges concerning molecule structure-function relationship and macroalgal variability.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review summarizes recent extraction and purification approaches for macroalgal polysaccharides, focusing on laminarin and fucoidan, including conventional solvent methods and innovative technologies such as ultrasound-, microwave-, and enzyme-assisted extraction. It also outlines biological activities and persistent challenges in standardization, structure-function understanding, and industrial scale-up.

Key findings

  • Macroalgae comprise more than 10,000 described species, and laminarin may constitute up to 35% of dried macroalgal biomass; laminarin and fucoidan show antiinflammatory, antimicrobial, anticoagulant, antioxidant, antiviral, antitumour, antiproliferative, and immunostimulatory activities in in vitro and in vivo systems.
  • Extraction commonly uses water, ethanol, or dilute HCl, with CaCl₂ often applied to remove alginates; innovative UAE, MAE, and EAE can improve efficiency, though MAE fucoidan yields were similar to conventional techniques, and EAE is limited by enzyme cost.
  • Purification relies mainly on anion-exchange chromatography for fucoidan, size-exclusion chromatography for molecular-weight fractionation and desalting, affinity chromatography, and membrane filtration; a dye-affinity method using toluidine blue achieved higher purity than commercially available Sigma-Aldrich fucoidan (95%).
  • Optimization studies used response surface methodology, including Box-Behnken and central composite designs; one optimized single-step fucoidan extraction used 0.03 M HCl at 90°C for 4 hours, and MAE produced low-molecular-weight fucoidan products around 5–30 kDa.

Methods

  • Narrative review of recent literature on extraction and purification of macroalgal polysaccharides, with emphasis on laminarin and fucoidan.
  • Synthesizes reported methods and conditions in tables covering extraction, anion-exchange chromatography, size-exclusion chromatography, and in vitro/in vivo bioactivities; no primary experimental data are presented.
  • Discusses optimization strategies, including response surface methodology and specific extraction/purification parameters reported in the reviewed studies.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: lack of standardized extraction methodologies has prevented official approval of polysaccharides or derived fractions for pharmaceutical, dermatological, nutraceutical, or other commercial applications; structure-function relationships and in vivo efficiency/bioavailability are poorly understood; UAE and EAE face high machinery, enzyme, and energy costs at large scale; membrane filtration is hindered by fouling; seasonal variation and macroalgal supply sustainability need further study.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not report a systematic search strategy, inclusion criteria, or quantitative meta-analysis.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.11.016

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

59 Not checked yet · 6 Own interpretation · 2 No basis given

Verify all 89 references — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 27
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 9
32 of 32
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The effect of microwaves on the structural properties and bioactivity of fucoidan is unknown.

    “However, effect of the microwaves on the structural properties and bioactivity of fucoidan is still unknown.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The in vivo efficiency and bioavailability of laminarin and fucoidan are not completely explored.

    “Though both laminarin and fucoidan have shown multiple biological activities in in vitro systems, their efficiency and bioavailability in in vivo model is not completely explored.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The role of chemical structure of macroalgal polysaccharides in their biological activities in vitro and in vivo is poorly understood.

    “The role of the chemical structure of macroalgal polysaccharides and their biological activities in vitro and in vivo is poorly understood to date.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The chemical structure of macroalgal polysaccharides varies with macroalgal species, environment, geographical location, and extraction/purification conditions such as temperature and time.

    “It is known that the chemical structure of the macroalgal polysaccharides varied according to factors affecting the macroalgal biomass (i.e.macroalgae species, environment and geographical location) as well as conditions during the extraction and purification of the polysaccharides (i.e.temperature, time).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Macroalgae is a renewable biomass that can be used for sustainable polysaccharide production.

    “In general, macroalgae is considered a renewable biomass which can be utilized for sustainable polysaccharide production.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The majority of macroalgae currently sold in the European market comes from wild harvest.

    “Due to the fact that the majority of macroalgae currently commercialized in the European market is wild harvested biomass”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Biological parameters of macroalgae can affect the chemical structure of their polysaccharides.

    “The chemical structure of the polysaccharides could also be affected by parameters related with the biology of macroalgae.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 103 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dunlap, 2013, Vol. 42
  2. Janson, 2012, Vol. 151

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 364

Metadata

Authors
Garcia-Vaquero, M., Rajauria, G., O'Doherty, J. V., & Sweeney, T.
Affiliations
University College Dublin (IE)
Venue
Food Research International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
99
Issue
Pt 3
Pages
1011-1020
ISSN
0963-9969 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2557114065
Cited by
364
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6
FWCI
23.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Research International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Science Foundation Ireland (14/IA/2548)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
Keywords
laminarin, fucoidan, brown macroalgae, polysaccharide extraction, polysaccharide purification, ultrasound-assisted extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, enzymatic extraction, membrane separation, desulphation, sulfated polysaccharides, structure-function relationship, nutraceuticals, functional foods
MeSH terms
Diffusion of Innovation, Food Additives, Food Handling, Glucans, Polysaccharides, Seaweed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review