The DOI matches its Crossref record; 297 of the 308 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet; 10 of the 474 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic
Open accessAbstract
Jeffrey D Sachs, Salim S Abdool Karim, Lara Aknin, Joseph Allen, Kirsten Brosbøl, Francesca Colombo, Gabriela Cuevas Barron, María Fernanda Espinosa, Vitor Gaspar, Alejandro Gaviria, Andy Haines, Peter J Hotez, Phoebe Koundouri, Felipe Larraín Bascuñán, Jong-Koo Lee, Muhammad Ali Pate, Gabriela Ramos, K Srinath Reddy, Ismail Serageldin, John Thwaites, Vaira Vike-Freiberga, Chen Wang, Miriam Khamadi Were, Lan Xue, Chandrika Bahadur, Maria Elena Bottazzi, Chris Bullen, George Laryea-Adjei, Yanis Ben Amor, Ozge Karadag, Guillaume Lafortune, Emma Torres, Lauren Barredo, Juliana G E Bartels, Neena Joshi, Margaret Hellard, Uyen Kim Huynh, Shweta Khandelwal, Jeffrey V Lazarus, Susan Michie
Verified 2026-10-05 · 1 reference not checked yet
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
240 Not checked yet · 126 Own interpretation · 123 No basis given · 61 Sources not found · 4 Partly supported · 1 Supported so far · 1 Own result · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“existing widespread gender inequalities in terms of labour, income, personal safety, education, and food security intensified over the course of the pandemic, with important regional, national, and local variations and disparities.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [286] Chu IY Alam P Larson HJ Lin L Social consequences of mass quarantine during epidemics: a systematic review with implications for the COVID-19 response J Travel Med 27 2020 taaa192 PMC7649384 33051660 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (‘Gender inequality and violence’; page not provided) reports unequal caregiving burdens and increased domestic violence during lockdowns. The Discussion describes differences across contexts, but the paper does not establish that gender inequalities in labour, income, education, and food security all intensified over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Partly supportedcites [287] Flor LS Friedman J Spencer CN Quantifying the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on gender equality on health, social, and economic indicators: a comprehensive review of data from March, 2020, to September, 2021 Lancet 399 2022 2381 2397 35247311 PMC8890763 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) says the study found intensified pre-existing gender inequalities and substantial regional variation, particularly in employment and unpaid labour. But the Results (page unavailable) report similar overall income-loss rates for women and men, while the Introduction mentions food security as an expected area of disruption without presenting a finding that its gender inequality intensified. The Discussion also says many initially observed gender gaps decreased over the pandemic, so the claim overgeneralises across domains and time. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [288] Morgan R Pimenta DN Rashid S Gender equality and COVID-19: act now before it is too late Lancet 399 2022 2327 2329 35247308 PMC8890757 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s main text reports pandemic-related gender disparities in employment, income loss, education, and perceived gender-based violence, with regional, national, and local variation. It also describes inequities as exacerbated by the pandemic. Our copy does not address food security, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In-person schooling was deprioritised even as other non-essential or less essential community and economic activities continued.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [307] National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools Living rapid review update 16: what is the specific role of daycares and schools in COVID-19 transmission? 2021 McMaster University Hamilton, ON
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [308] National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools Living rapid review update 4: what is known about the risk of transmission of COVID-19 within post-secondary institutions and the strategies to mitigate on-campus outbreaks? https://www.nccmt.ca/covid-19/covid-19-rapid-evidence-service/34 Feb 4, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites [309] Xu W Li X Dong Y SARS-CoV-2 transmission in schools: an updated living systematic review (version 2; November 2020) J Glob Health 11 2021 10004 PMC8590829 34804514 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The introductory Note (page unavailable) reports widespread, repeated or sustained school closures, supporting the part of the claim about in-person schooling being curtailed. It does not compare those closures with the continuation of non-essential community or economic activities, so the claimed deprioritisation is not established. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The social and financial effects of COVID-19 also contribute to the issues surrounding long COVID, including mental ill health.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The burdens of long COVID
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [336] Raveendran AV Jayadevan R Sashidharan S Long COVID: an overview Diabetes Metab Syndr 15 2021 869 875 33892403 PMC8056514 source
The Pathophysiology of “Long COVID” section states that the social and financial impact of COVID-19 contributes to post-COVID issues, including psychological issues. The Common symptoms section also identifies anxiety, depression and PTSD as mental health problems in people with long COVID. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Not checked yetcites [341] Nabavi N Long COVID: how to define it and how to manage it BMJ 370 2020 m3489 32895219 source
- Partly supportedcites [342] Aiyegbusi OL Hughes SE Turner G Symptoms, complications and management of long COVID: a review J R Soc Med 114 2021 428 442 34265229 PMC8450986 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The review’s ‘Impact on mental health’ section links inadequate social support and stigmatisation to PTSD symptoms and hopelessness. Its ‘Aspects of management’ section also describes work loss and a need for financial support among people with long COVID, but does not establish that financial effects contribute to mental ill health. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Prosociality was at a low ebb in many societies during the past 2 years.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Five pillars of the successful fight against emerging infectious diseases
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Public policies have also failed to draw upon the behavioural and social sciences”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Methodology
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Epidemic control was seriously hindered by substantial public opposition to routine public health and social measures, such as the wearing of properly fitting face masks and getting vaccinated.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Methodology
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A major challenge to the test and quarantine approach for COVID-19 was the high proportion of asymptomatic infections, especially in young people.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Rapid response to a new outbreak to control community transmission
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Coordination among governments was inadequate on policies to contain the pandemic, including travel protocols to slow the global transmission of the virus, testing strategies, public health and social measures, commodity supply chains, data standards and reporting systems, and advice to the public, despite the very high interdependence among countries.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Methodology
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the uncontrolled first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan, R 0 was around 2·4.20”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Four COVID-19 control regimes
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [20] The Royal Society Reproduction number (R) and growth rate (r) of the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK: methods of estimation, data sources, causes of heterogeneity, and use as a guide in policy formulation https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/set-c/set-covid-19-R-estimates.pdf Sept 9, 2020 (preprint).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the lack of a multilateral and coordinated approach by governments to manage intellectual property rights, technology transfer, international financing, the allocation of vaccines from multinational pharmaceutical companies, and the support for vaccine production in LMICs for use in those countries, has come at a great cost in terms of inequitable access to vaccines.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Methodology
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 245
- The quote only partly states this claim. 5
- Probably not a substantial claim. 74
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Several serosurveys suggest that Africa experienced large waves of infection but that most cases went unreported, in part because they did not lead to severe disease.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [183] Mulenga LB Hines JZ Fwoloshi S Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in six districts in Zambia in July, 2020: a cross-sectional cluster sample survey Lancet Glob Health 9 2021 e773 e781 33711262 PMC8382844 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that official case counts underestimated infections in six Zambian districts by a factor of 92, and says the high proportion of asymptomatic infections could help explain the relatively mild strain on hospitals. But the study’s evidence for widespread transmission during Zambia’s first wave came chiefly from rtPCR; its seroprevalence estimate was low. The Introduction describes serosurveys elsewhere in Africa, but this paper does not establish large, mostly unreported waves across Africa. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [184] Lobaloba Ingoba L Djontu JC Mfoutou Mapanguy CC Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a population living in Bomassa village, Republic of Congo IJID Reg 2 2022 130 136 35721438 PMC8760703 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction reports high seroprevalence in several African studies and says limited testing makes the pandemic difficult to assess in remote areas. The Conclusion finds evidence of past exposure among Bomassa residents with no known COVID-19 symptoms. Together these support widespread infection and a plausible reason infections went undetected, but the paper does not establish that most African cases went unreported or that lack of severe disease was a major reason. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Partly supportedcites [185] Nkuba AN Makiala SM Guichet E High prevalence of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (anti-SARS-CoV-2) antibodies after the first wave of COVID-19 in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo: results of a cross-sectional household-based survey Clin Infect Dis 74 2022 882 890 34089598 PMC8244674 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion estimates approximately 2.4 million infections in Kinshasa during the first wave, versus 8,290 reported cases, and says most cases went unnoticed. It also reports no corresponding rise in mortality or saturation of hospital services. The paper discusses other African serosurveys, but its evidence for widespread unreported infection and limited severe disease is specific to Kinshasa, not Africa as a whole. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked yetcites [186] Mandolo J Msefula J Henrion MYR SARS-CoV-2 exposure in Malawian blood donors: an analysis of seroprevalence and variant dynamics between January 2020 and July 2021 BMC Med 19 2021 303 34794434 PMC8601780 source
- Not checked yetcites [187] Adetifa IMO Uyoga S Gitonga JN Temporal trends of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence during the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic in Kenya Nat Commun 12 2021 3966 PMC8233334 34172732 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“In contrast with its neighbour, Norway, Sweden's response was lax,229 resulting in a much higher death rate (about 1500 deaths per million population).”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Widespread political ineffectiveness
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [229] Claeson M Hanson S COVID-19 and the Swedish enigma Lancet 397 2021 259 261 33357494 PMC7755568 source
The citation follows “Sweden's response was lax,” not the later death-rate figure. The paper describes Sweden’s response as an outlier among its Nordic neighbours and says it allowed community transmission to occur relatively unchecked, supporting the attributed comparison with Norway. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Not checked yetcites [230] Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections: cumulative deaths—Sweden https://covid19.healthdata.org/sweden?view=cumulative-deaths&tab=trend Jan 20, 2022
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“although the omicron variant (B.1.1.529) has been undoing some of these gains.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Methodology
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“WHO acted too cautiously and too slowly on several important matters: to warn about the human transmissibility of the virus, to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, to support international travel protocols designed to slow the spread of the virus, to endorse the public use of face masks as protective gear, and to recognise the airborne transmission of the virus.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Methodology
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This pandemic broke out at a moment of weak global preparedness. Despite ample previous warnings of increasing pandemic risks, at least since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003, most of the world was not prepared for COVID-19.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Five pillars of the successful fight against emerging infectious diseases
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A single new case of COVID-19 at the start of the pandemic became hundreds, or in some situations thousands, of cases within a month. The original SARS-CoV-2 variant that was first identified in Wuhan, China, had a doubling time of approximately 3 days, meaning that, over a 30-day month, a new (index) case would lead to roughly ten doublings, or 1024 (210) new infections on the tenth doubling.12”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Rapid response to a new outbreak to control community transmission
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Sachs JD Comparing COVID-19 control in the Asia-Pacific and North Atlantic regions Asian Econ Pap 20 2021 30 54
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Additionally, at the national level, many governments showed themselves to be untrustworthy and ineffective.11”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Five pillars of the successful fight against emerging infectious diseases
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Lazarus JV Ratzan S Palayew A COVID-SCORE: a global survey to assess public perceptions of government responses to COVID-19 (COVID-SCORE-10) PLoS One 15 2020 e0240011 PMC7538106 33022023 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As of May 31, 2022, there were 6·9 million reported deaths and 17·2 million estimated deaths from COVID-19, as reported by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Executive summary
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites IHME
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The IHME mean estimates of COVID-19 infections and deaths are sufficiently accurate for the Commission's analysis.
In the paper
“In many countries, social trust in government and other authorities among citizens has declined markedly in the past two decades (and over the past four decades in the United States)10—related, at least in part, to the persistent increase in socioeconomic inequalities.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Five pillars of the successful fight against emerging infectious diseases
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [10] Pew Research Centre Public trust in government: 1958–2022 https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2022/06/06/public-trust-in-government-1958-2022/ June 6, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“This decline in infections can occur even without extensive contact tracing, but requires supportive personal behaviours and access to testing early in the epidemic, as was achieved in Republic of Korea.19”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Rapid response to a new outbreak to control community transmission
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Shuren J Stenzel T South Korea's implementation of a COVID-19 national testing strategy Health Affairs May 25, 2021 10.1377/forefront.20210521.255232
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Emergency global financing from the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and regional development banks had a salutary role, although much larger financial flows from high-income to low-income regions were warranted.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Methodology
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sustainable development process has been set back by several years, with a deep underfinancing of investments needed to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the aims of the Paris Climate Agreement.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Methodology
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Overwhelming evidence for either a zoonotic or research-related origin is lacking: the jury is still out.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites The Lancet 45
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The exact timing and identity of the earliest cases remains uncertain, but this timing matters, as the world might have lost several precious weeks in containing the outbreak.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The initial outbreak
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, as no animals in the market tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, it is not known whether the COVID-19 cases associated with this market indicate the actual proximal origin of the virus or a secondary outbreak brought by humans to the marketplace.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The herd-immunity strategy was originally advocated by some pundits on the grounds that acquired immunity would protect from COVID-19 reinfection for an extended period; however, it has since been found that immunity tends to wane over time, and new SARS-CoV-2 variants arise that evade acquired immunity.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Four COVID-19 control regimes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Independent experts consulted by the Lancet COVID-19 Commission shared the view that hypotheses about both natural and laboratory spillovers are in play and need further investigation.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At the national level, low politicisation of public health measures, consistent and transparent collaboration among scientific and academic organisations and leadership, and oversight to encourage collective action can be linked to better national health systems responses, financing for social and economic protection, and accurate and consistent public health messaging.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Prosociality for pandemic control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites figure 1
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The epidemic response of many governments has been led by political considerations and hospital-system administrators rather than by public health considerations and specialists.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Four COVID-19 control regimes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“8 days later, on Jan 22, 2020, WHO declared that human-to-human transmission was occurring, but clarity on the severity of COVID-19 infection was pending.94”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [94] WHO Mission summary: WHO field visit to Wuhan, China 20–21 January 2020 https://www.who.int/china/news/detail/22-01-2020-field-visit-wuhan-china-jan-2020 Jan 22, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“On Jan 23, 2020, WHO declined to declare the novel coronavirus a global emergency,80 waiting until Jan 30, 2020 to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.81”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Early response to the COVID-19 outbreak in China and globally
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [80] UN Coronavirus: ‘An emergency in China, but not yet a global health emergency’ UN News Jan 23, 2020 https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/01/1055891
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [81] WHO Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) https://www.who.int/news/item/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-second-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-nCoV) Jan 30, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On Jan 4, 2020, the head of the Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) telephoned his counterpart at the US CDC to inform the United States of the new outbreak.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Early response to the COVID-19 outbreak in China and globally
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Independent researchers have not yet investigated the US laboratories engaged in the laboratory manipulation of SARS-CoV-like viruses, nor have they investigated the details of the laboratory research that had been underway in Wuhan.47”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [47] WHO WHO-convened global study of origins of SARS-CoV-2: China part https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-convened-global-study-of-origins-of-sars-cov-2-china-part March 30, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are no published records of what was conveyed by the Chinese CDC on that occasion, although US officials probably had substantial cause for concern about human-to-human transmission.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Early response to the COVID-19 outbreak in China and globally
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, in the case of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, politically cautious US national authorities deferred to local authorities with costly results worldwide, including the rapid global spread of the virus.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“On Jan 23, 2020, China announced a strict lockdown of Wuhan and five other provincial cities, covering a population of around 20 million people.79”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Early response to the COVID-19 outbreak in China and globally
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [79] Nature Coronavirus: the first three months as it happened Nature 2020 10.1038/d41586-020-00154-w 32152592 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In brief, there are many potential proximal origins of SARS-CoV-2, but there is still a shortfall of independent, scientific, and collaborative work on the issue.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“On Jan 11, 2020, a scientist in China posted the genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 to a public database, and Chinese authorities posted the sequence the next day.76, 77”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Early response to the COVID-19 outbreak in China and globally
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [76] Allam Z The first 50 days of COVID-19: a detailed chronological timeline and extensive review of literature documenting the pandemic Surveying the COVID-19 pandemic and its implications 2020 Elsevier Oxford 1 7
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [77] Huang C Wang Y Li X Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China Lancet 395 2020 497 506 31986264 PMC7159299 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“For these and related reasons, in 2021 the WHA launched a process of WHO reforms, starting a two-track process to determine whether to update the IHR (2005) and whether the WHA should develop a new global accord on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response.90”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [90] WHO World Health Assembly agrees to launch process to develop historic global accord on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response https://www.who.int/news/item/01-12-2021-world-health-assembly-agrees-to-launch-process-to-develop-historic-global-accord-on-pandemic-prevention-preparedness-and-response Dec 1, 2021
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Acknowledging the uncertainties faced by WHO before the event, we list five areas in which WHO was too slow to act after the COVID-19 outbreak: (1) the recognition of asymptomatic human-to-human transmission, (2) the announcement of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, (3) the advice on precautionary approaches to travel, (4) the advice on face masks, and (5) the acknowledgement of”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) has resisted disclosing details of the research on SARS-CoV-related viruses that it had been supporting,66 providing extensively redacted information only as required by Freedom of Information Act lawsuits.67”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [66] Collins FS Statement on misinformation about NIH support of specific “gain-of-function” research https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/statement-misinformation-about-nih-support-specific-gain-function-research May 19, 2021
- Not checked yetcites [67] Lerner S NIH sent The Intercept 292 fully redacted pages related to virus research in Wuhan The Intercept Feb 20, 2022 https://theintercept.com/2022/02/20/nih-coronavirus-research-wuhan-redacted/
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As of the time of publication of this report, all three research-associated hypotheses are still plausible: infection in the field, infection with a natural virus in the laboratory, and infection with a manipulated virus in the laboratory.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By early January, 2020, a preliminary genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 was available to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and to other scientists in China, who by then knew that Wuhan was facing a coronavirus epidemic.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Early response to the COVID-19 outbreak in China and globally
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By Jan 23, 2020, when China initiated its highly effective lockdown of Hubei Province, the virus was spreading around the world.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Early response to the COVID-19 outbreak in China and globally
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“On Jan 17, 2020, the United States began screening passengers arriving from Wuhan at three airports: one in Los Angeles, CA; one in New York, NY; and one in Santa Fe, NM.78”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Early response to the COVID-19 outbreak in China and globally
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [78] Grady D Three U.S. airports to check passengers for a deadly Chinese coronavirus The New York Times Jan 17, 2020 https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/17/health/china-coronavirus-airport-screening.html
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“More generally, WHO has lacked high-level political backing, financing, and convening power.88, 89”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [88] Gostin LO Klock KA Clark H Financing the future of WHO Lancet 399 2022 1445 1447 35338858 PMC8942479 source
- Not matchedcites [89] Daugirdas K Burci GL Financing the World Health Organization: what lessons for multilateralism? Int Org Law Rev 16 2019 299 338
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Initially, there were basic uncertainties about the infectiousness of the virus, its asymptomatic spread, and the methods of transmission, although over time the scientific community confirmed that considerable asymptomatic airborne transmission occurs and that the virus is highly transmissible.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“On Jan 5, 2020, WHO made its first announcement of the Wuhan outbreak.75”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Early response to the COVID-19 outbreak in China and globally
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [75] WHO COVID-19—China https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2020-DON229 Jan 5, 2020
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In response, WHO Headquarters contacted Chinese officials on Jan 1, 2020, for more information.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Early response to the COVID-19 outbreak in China and globally
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Although the wearing of face masks has been widely accepted as a measure to decrease the spread of respiratory illnesses in the Western Pacific region, perhaps because of the experience of these countries with severe acute respiratory syndrome, WHO did not recommend use of face masks by the public until June 5, 2020—nearly 4 months after the declaration of the Public Health Emergency of”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [111] WHO Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332293 5 June 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [112] Mandavilli A WHO finally endorses masks to prevent coronavirus transmission June 5, 2020 The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/05/health/coronavirus-masks-who.html
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A rapid review of international-travel-related control measures for COVID-19 found that travel restrictions can limit the spread of disease across national borders, and the combination of PCR testing and quarantines can together decrease transmission from travellers.109”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [109] Burns J Movsisyan A Stratil JM International travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review Cochrane Database Syst Rev 25 2021 CD013717 PMC8406796 33763851
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“After this meeting, WHO declined to declare the rapid spread of the novel coronavirus a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, but changed its position around a week later with an announcement on Jan 30, 2020.95”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [95] Maxmen A Why did the world's pandemic warning system fail when COVID hit? Nature 589 2021 499 500 33500574 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The first diagnosis of COVID-19 in the United States was on Jan 20, 2020,102 in a traveller who had returned to the United States from Wuhan on Jan 15, 2020.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [102] Holshue ML DeBolt C Lindquist S First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States N Engl J Med 382 2020 929 936 32004427 PMC7092802 source
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Meanwhile, the threat of airborne transmission remained unrecognised and, as a result, the use of face coverings, ventilation, and air filtration as effective risk reduction measures were not adequately encouraged.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Starting on Jan 10, 2020, and even as late as Feb 24, 2020, WHO continued to recommend that travellers practise usual precautions and advised against the application of travel or trade restrictions to countries with COVID-19 outbreaks.105, 106, 107, 108”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [105] WHO WHO advice for international travel and trade in relation to the outbreak of pneumonia caused by a new coronavirus in China https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/who-advice-for-international-travel-and-trade-in-relation-to-the-outbreak-of-pneumonia-caused-by-a-new-coronavirus-in-china Jan 10, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [106] WHO Updated WHO advice for international traffic in relation to the outbreak of the novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/updated-who-advice-for-international-traffic-in-relation-to-the-outbreak-of-the-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-24-jan Jan 24, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [107] WHO Updated WHO advice for international traffic in relation to the outbreak of the novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/updated-who-advice-for-international-traffic-in-relation-to-the-outbreak-of-the-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov Jan 27, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [108] WHO Updated WHO recommendations for international traffic in relation to COVID-19 outbreak https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/updated-who-recommendations-for-international-traffic-in-relation-to-covid-19-outbreak Feb 29, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The first case in Europe was diagnosed on Jan 24, 2020, in Bordeaux, France.103”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [103] Reuters Staff UPDATE 2-France confirms first three cases of coronavirus in Europe Jan 24, 2020 Reuters https://www.reuters.com/article/china-health-france-idUSL8N29T5F4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Numerous publications have attempted to overturn mistaken ideas about transmission routes for respiratory infectious diseases,117, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143 and have initiated a paradigm shift towards more accurate definitions.117”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > A paradigm shift in how we view and address the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [117] Marr LC Tang JW A paradigm shift to align transmission routes with mechanisms Clin Infect Dis 73 2021 1747 1749 34415335 source
- Not checked yetcites [137] Allen JG Marr LC Recognizing and controlling airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in indoor environments Indoor Air 30 2020 557 558 32557915 PMC7323102 source
- Not checked yetcites [138] Greenhalgh T Jimenez JL Prather KA Tufekci Z Fisman D Schooley R Ten scientific reasons in support of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Lancet 397 2021 1603 1605 33865497 PMC8049599 source
- Not checked yetcites [139] Milton DK A Rosetta Stone for understanding infectious drops and aerosols J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 9 2020 413 415 32706376 PMC7495905 source
- Not checked yetcites [140] Tang JW Marr LC Milton DK Aerosols should not be defined by distance travelled J Hosp Infect 115 2021 131 132 34048848 PMC8149158 source
- Not checked yetcites [141] Morawska L Cao J Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: the world should face the reality Environ Int 139 2020 105730 PMC7151430 32294574 source
- Not checked yetcites [142] Morawska L Milton DK It is time to address airborne transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Clin Infect Dis 71 2020 2311 2313 32628269 PMC7454469 source
- Not checked yetcites [143] Tang JW Marr LC Li Y Dancer SJ COVID-19 has redefined airborne transmission BMJ 373 2021 n913 33853842 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Of the first 47 people to be diagnosed in Europe,104 14 had recently visited China.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [104] Spiteri G Fielding J Diercke M First cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the WHO European Region, 24 January to 21 February 2020 Euro Surveill 25 2020 2000178 PMC7068164 32156327 source
plainn = 47- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“(8) the poor enforcement of appropriate levels of biosafety regulations in the lead-up to the pandemic, raising the possibility of a laboratory-related outbreak;”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Failures and successes of international cooperation
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The official cumulative death toll from COVID-19, reported by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), was 6·9 million as of May 31, 2022.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional differences in mortality rates
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [146] Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections May 31, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The WHO Eastern Mediterranean region has a mid-range reported death rate (734 per million population) and a high estimated total death rate (2779 per million population).”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional differences in mortality rates
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [146] Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections May 31, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“By the end of 2021, Australia, Cambodia, China, Hong Kong SAR, New Zealand, Singapore, and Viet Nam had all achieved full vaccination rates of adult populations of more than 60%.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [157] Mathieu E Ritchie H Ortiz-Ospina E A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations Nat Hum Behav 5 2021 947 953 33972767 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The R 0 of the omicron variant is several times higher than that of the previous variants, making the feasibility of a suppression policy exceedingly difficult”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The biggest wave in terms of deaths, claiming millions of lives in just a few weeks, was the delta wave from April to June, 2021.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional differences in mortality rates
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the IHME estimates the true death toll at more than twice this number, 17·2 million”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional differences in mortality rates
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [146] Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections May 31, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The delta wave caused a spike in cases in most countries in the region, with much higher mortality, although actual deaths have been substantially under-reported in several countries”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [146] Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections May 31, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The omicron variant brought another enormous global wave of infections, starting in December, 2021.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional differences in mortality rates
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Particular attention should be paid to Latin America, which has the highest number of excess deaths relative to population.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional differences in mortality rates
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [150] Reuters COVID-19 tracker https://graphics.reuters.com/world-coronavirus-tracker-and-maps/regions/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Thereafter, China succeeded in suppressing the pandemic to fewer than 100 new cases daily by early March, 2020, and to fewer than ten new cases per day by late April, 2020.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The region with the next lowest number of reported deaths is the WHO African region, for which the reported death rate is 165 per million population; however, the total death rate estimated by IHME is more than ten times higher, at 1774 per million population.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional differences in mortality rates
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [146] Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections May 31, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The WHO Western Pacific region, which includes east Asia and Oceania, stands out for its very low average mortality rate, both in terms of reported deaths (125 per million population) and estimated total deaths (300 per million population) attributed to COVID-19.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional differences in mortality rates
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [146] Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections May 31, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The WHO South-East Asia region similarly has a relatively low reported mortality rate (366 per million population) and a far higher estimated total death rate (2549 per million population).”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional differences in mortality rates
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [146] Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections May 31, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“4051 per million population for the region of the Americas”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional differences in mortality rates
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [146] Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections May 31, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Estimated infections are about 100 times higher than reported infections in the region, but still remain lower than in all other WHO regions”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [146] Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections May 31, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The countries of the Western Pacific region generally adopted suppression strategies, and were broadly successful in their implementation.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The omicron variant led to the greatest surge yet in the number of confirmed cases per day, estimated by the IHME to be roughly 45 million per day at the peak in January, 2022, compared with the previous worldwide peak of around 15 million per day in April, 2021.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Premature lifting of public health and social measures
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [146] Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections May 31, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In Europe, two Nordic countries stand out as having lower death rates than the rest of the continent—Iceland (about 210 deaths per million population227) and Norway (about 280 deaths per million population228).”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Widespread political ineffectiveness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [227] Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections: cumulative deaths—Iceland https://covid19.healthdata.org/iceland?view=cumulative-deaths&tab=trend Jan 20, 2022
- Not checked yetcites [228] Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections: cumulative deaths—Norway https://covid19.healthdata.org/norway?view=cumulative-deaths&tab=trend Jan 20, 2022
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“IHME estimates that 4·3 billion people, or 54% of the world's population, were infected with SARS-CoV-2 between Dec 1, 2021 and May 31, 2022.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Premature lifting of public health and social measures
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [146] Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections May 31, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Seroprevalence of COVID-19 IgG antibodies in non-vaccinated individuals older than 6 years increased from 24% in December, 2020 and January, 2021, to 62% in June and July, 2021, confirming that hundreds of millions of people were infected during the delta wave.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [201] Murhekar MV Bhatnagar T Thangaraj JWV Seroprevalence of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among the general population and healthcare workers in India, June–July 2021: a population-based cross-sectional study PLoS Med 18 2021 e1003877 PMC8726494 34890407
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“various political leaders publicly undermined WHO, disseminated campaigns against it and its advice, and even tried to halt its funding.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Disinformation in media
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [234] Gisondi MA Barber R Faust JS A deadly infodemic: social media and the power of COVID-19 misinformation J Med Internet Res 24 2022 e35552 PMC8812140 35007204 source
- Not matchedcites [248] Shear MD Trump attacks W.H.O. over criticisms of U.S. approach to coronavirus April 7, 2020 The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/07/us/politics/coronavirus-trump-who.html
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [249] Reuters Staff Brazil to consider leaving World Health Organization: Bolsonaro June 9, 2020 Reuters https://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-bolsonaro-who-idUSKBN23G27R
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“India reported roughly 20 million COVID-19 infections and 250 000 deaths attributed to the disease between Jan 1 and June 30, 2021, but the actual numbers are estimated to be vastly higher.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
hedgedn = 18- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Anti-science rhetoric and disinformation about COVID-19 are now promoted by several elected members of the US Congress”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Disinformation in media
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [244] Hotez PJ Mounting antiscience aggression in the United States PLoS Biol 19 2021 e3001369 PMC8351985 34319972
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“46% of people in the UK and 48% of people in the United States were exposed to false information.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Disinformation in media
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [242] van der Linden S Roozenbeek J Compton J Inoculating against fake news about COVID-19 Front Psychol 11 2020 566790 PMC7644779 33192844 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Second, people who are currently unvaccinated (ie, have not received any doses of a COVID-19 vaccine)—roughly 2·5 billion people or 33% of the global population as of Aug 19, 2022146—remain vulnerable to morbidity and mortality and provide opportunities for the virus to circulate freely, increasing the risk of dangerous mutations occurring.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Premature lifting of public health and social measures
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [146] Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections May 31, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The Eastern Mediterranean region has reported relatively low death rates. However, as in the African and the South-East Asia regions, the number of deaths has been substantially under-reported”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [146] Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections May 31, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The IHME estimates that there were around 417 million infections and 1·6 million deaths from COVID-19 in India between April 1 and July 1, 2021, compared with just 18 million reported cases and 252 997 reported deaths”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [146] Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation COVID-19 projections https://covid19.healthdata.org/projections May 31, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Of the 22·1 million job losses in the United States between January and April, 2020, 8·3 million (38%) occurred in the leisure and hospitality sector,280 although this sector accounted for only 11% of pre-pandemic employment.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [280] Falk G Romero PD Nicchitta IA Nyhof EC Unemployment rates during the COVID-19 pandemic https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46554 Aug 20, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [281] Oxford Economics Tourism-related employment report—September 2021 http://blog.oxfordeconomics.com/content/us-travel-and-tourism-employment-report-september-2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Other groups that have been disproportionately affected include people with comorbid medical conditions, particularly those with immunocompromised status; people living with physical disabilities or mental disorders; residents of congregant settings; and essential workers.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Unequal health effects of the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [262] Wynants L Calster B Collins G Riley R Heinze G Schuit E Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal BMJ 369 2020 m1328 PMC7222643 32265220 source
- Not checked yetcites [263] Gates M Pillay J Wingert A Risk factors associated with severe outcomes of COVID-19: an updated rapid review to inform national guidance on vaccine prioritization in Canada medRxiv 2021 published online Nov 28. 10.1101/2021.04.23.21256014 (preprint). source
- Not checked yetcites [264] Li X Zhong X Wang Y Zeng X Luo T Liu Q Clinical determinants of the severity of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis PLoS One 16 2021 e0250602 PMC8092779 33939733 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The majority of health-care workers, in particular, are women.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Unequal health effects of the pandemic
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Numerous sources documented a clear and consistent pattern of increased anxiety and depression in the early months of the pandemic, which declined during later months in some countries but not in others.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Unequal health effects of the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [272] Robinson E Sutin AR Daly M Jones A A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 J Affect Disord 296 2022 567 576 34600966 PMC8578001 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“informal employment accounts for 60% of global employment; the International Labour Organization projected in early 2020 that 1·6 billion informal workers would be the most severely affected and would lose 60% of their earnings in the first month of the pandemic.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [282] Lee S Schmidt-Klau D Verick S The labour market impacts of the COVID-19: a global perspective Indian J Labour Econ 63 2020 11 15 PMC7537371 33041544 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This greater trust in government was also significantly associated with a greater adoption of health and prosocial behaviours and lower rates of decline in these behaviours over time.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Public attitudes towards pandemic control and investments in behavioural sciences
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [255] Han Q Zheng B Cristea M Trust in government regarding COVID-19 and its associations with preventive health behaviour and prosocial behaviour during the pandemic: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study Psychol Med 2021 published March 26. 10.1017/S0033291721001306 PMC8144822 33769242
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“health workers worldwide are facing increased violence, initially because they were viewed as vectors of disease and then because of polarised politics surrounding vaccination.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [284] Cukier A Vogel L Escalating violence against health workers prompts calls for action CMAJ 193 2021 E1896 PMC8677584 34903595 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Protests were most heavily concentrated in the European region (dark grey; 22 protests) and the region of the Americas (dark blue; 16 protests)”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Public attitudes towards pandemic control and investments in behavioural sciences
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [258] Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Global protest tracker https://carnegieendowment.org/publications/interactive/protest-tracker
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A systematic review estimates more than 53 million additional cases of major depressive disorders and 76 million additional cases of anxiety disorders globally in 2020.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Unequal health effects of the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [273] Santomauro DF Mantilla Herrera AM Shadid J Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic Lancet 398 2021 1700 1712 34634250 PMC8500697
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Workers of colour in the United States, who are over-represented in high-risk, essential industries, are also more likely than other populations to have lower incomes, live in multigenerational households, and use public transport to travel to work.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The effects of the pandemic have been hugely unequal across the world, both within and between countries.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Unequal health effects of the pandemic
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Daily emotions were more negative (fewer positive emotions and more negative emotions), whereas reports of loneliness and self-harm initially increased but later returned to their pre-pandemic levels.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Unequal health effects of the pandemic
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the overall death toll of COVID-19 is higher among men than women”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [289] Peckham H de Gruijter NM Raine C Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission Nat Commun 11 2020 6317 PMC7726563 33298944 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In the United States, the number of women in the workforce who were mothers decreased by 21·1% between March and April, 2020, whereas the number of working fathers decreased by only 14·7%.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [299] US Census Bureau Tracking job losses for mothers of school-age children during a health crisis https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/03/moms-work-and-the-pandemic.html March 3, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“One estimate from the World Bank suggests that this generation of children could potentially lose an estimated $10 trillion globally in their life earnings.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [310] The Lancet COVID-19 Commission India Task Force Reopening schools after COVID-19 closures https://covid19commission.org/regional-task-force-india April, 2021
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Black (66%) and Hispanic (64%) students were almost twice as likely as White (34%) students to be learning fully remotely, and were also twice as likely as White students who were also remote to have no live access to a teacher.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [311] Levinson M Geller AC Allen JG Health equity, schooling hesitancy, and the social determinants of learning Lancet Reg Health Am 2 2021 100032 PMC9790768 36588583 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The net worth of the richest ten people in the world increased to $1·5 trillion,321 and these ten people possess six times more wealth than the poorest 3·1 billion people.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [321] Oxfam Ten richest men double their fortunes in pandemic while incomes of 99 percent of humanity fall https://www.oxfam.org.uk/mc/np588q/ Jan 17, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In Latin America, approximately 26 million people lost their jobs in 2020; this region had the largest losses in terms of hours worked worldwide and reduction of labour incomes.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [312] The Lancet COVID-19 Commission Regional Task Force: Latin America and the Caribbean Regional coordination for strengthening pandemic preparedness, vaccine access, and effective implementation of vaccine deployment plans https://covid19commission.org/regional-task-force-lac November, 2021
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“wealthy households experienced an increase in net worth even as hundreds of millions of workers worldwide lost their jobs.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Women are also disproportionately represented within the population of care centres for older people, many of which experienced outbreaks of COVID-19 and many deaths from the disease.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [285] Su Z Cheshmehzangi A McDonnell D Šegalo S Ahmad J Bennett B Gender inequality and health disparity amid COVID-19 Nurs Outlook 70 2022 89 95 34774306 PMC8410638 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“School closures have had devastating effects on student learning, mental health, socioemotional outcomes, and lifetime earning potential”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the United Nations Population Fund projected in April, 2020 that if the lockdown continued for 6 months or more, 31 million additional cases of gender-based violence could be expected to occur, lockdown policies remained gender-blind.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [322] UN Population Fund Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on family planning and ending gender-based violence, female genital mutilation and child marriage https://www.unfpa.org/resources/impact-COVID-19-pandemic-family-planning-and-ending-gender-based-violence-female-genital April, 2020
hedgedconditionaln = 31- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“UNESCO estimates that nearly 370 million children across 50 countries have missed meals since school closures began, and that globally an estimated 39 billion in-school meals have been missed”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [313] UNICEF Nutrition crisis looms as more than 39 billion in-school meals missed since start of pandemic—UNICEF and WFP https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/nutrition-crisis-looms-more-39-billion-school-meals-missed-start-pandemic-unicef-and Jan 27, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirectn = 370- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Lack of economic support at home and the lack of protection offered by schools affected girls in particular, as it put them at increased risk of mental health problems, violence, child marriage, pregnancy, female genital mutilation, and HIV infection”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [304] Barron GC Laryea-Adjei G Vike-Freiberga V Safeguarding people living in vulnerable conditions in the COVID-19 era through universal health coverage and social protection Lancet Public Health 7 2022 e86 e92 34906331 PMC8665842
- Not checked yetcites [310] The Lancet COVID-19 Commission India Task Force Reopening schools after COVID-19 closures https://covid19commission.org/regional-task-force-india April, 2021
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the United States, for example, women account for 70% of residents in nursing homes.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [285] Su Z Cheshmehzangi A McDonnell D Šegalo S Ahmad J Bennett B Gender inequality and health disparity amid COVID-19 Nurs Outlook 70 2022 89 95 34774306 PMC8410638 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Stringent lockdowns in India helped to slow the spread of COVID-19 but brought about severe economic and social hardships: gross domestic product (GDP) contracted by 24% for the second quarter of 2020 and 7·3% for the year 2020.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [323] The World Bank GDP growth (annual %)—India https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=IN
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [324] Vyas M Impact of lockdown on labour in India Indian J Labour Econ 63 2020 1 5 PMC7474503 32921939 source
- Not checked yetcites [325] Adhikari A Goregaonkar N Narayanan R Panicker N Ramamoorthy N Manufactured maladies: lives and livelihoods of migrant workers during COVID-19 lockdown in India Indian J Labour Econ 63 2020 969 997 33106737 PMC7577364 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“An average of four in ten in-school meals have been missed by children around the world, and this number increases to as many as nine in ten in some countries.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [310] The Lancet COVID-19 Commission India Task Force Reopening schools after COVID-19 closures https://covid19commission.org/regional-task-force-india April, 2021
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“195 countries closed schools during the pandemic, affecting more than 1·5 billion children and young people and posing enormous long-term and unrecoverable costs to them, their parents, and the economy.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [306] UNESCO 1.3 billion learners are still affected by school or university closures, as educational institutions start reopening around the world, says UNESCO https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/13-billion-learners-are-still-affected-school-or-university-closures-educational April 29, 2020
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“School closures have also affected children's physical health, food security, and nutritional status.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
plaindirectn = 370- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Internally displaced people, including people in areas controlled by armed groups, are especially vulnerable to infectious diseases and have limited access to safe housing, sanitation, and health care.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [334] Gillard E-C COVID-19 vaccine: reaching people in areas controlled by armed groups Dec 16, 2020 Chatham House https://www.chathamhouse.org/2020/12/covid-19-vaccine-reaching-people-areas-controlled-armed-groups
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Indigenous women and girls have often been disproportionately affected by the pandemic, as many live in extreme poverty with diminished incomes and limited access to mainstream and high-quality health care.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [333] UN Women Addressing the economic fallout of COVID-19: pathways and policy options for a gender-responsive recovery https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2020/06/policy-brief-addressing-the-economic-fallout-of-covid-19 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There are several challenges in the diagnosis of long COVID, including the length of the follow-up period, the accuracy of self-reporting, the symptoms examined, the reliance on parent-reported symptoms for children, negative PCR tests (false-negative results) in some patients, an absence of antibodies in patients who do not seroconvert, and difficulties in establishing a direct link between”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The burdens of long COVID
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [336] Raveendran AV Jayadevan R Sashidharan S Long COVID: an overview Diabetes Metab Syndr 15 2021 869 875 33892403 PMC8056514
- Not checked yetcites [337] Crook H Raza S Nowell J Young M Edison P Long COVID—mechanisms, risk factors, and management BMJ 374 2021 n1648 34312178
- Not checked yetcites [346] Assaf G Davis H McCorkell L An analysis of the prolonged COVID-19 symptoms survey by patient-led research team https://patientresearchcovid19.com/research/report-1/ May 11, 2020
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“An estimated 120 million jobs were lost for the duration of the lockdown, and millions of migrant workers returned to their home villages under severe distress”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [323] The World Bank GDP growth (annual %)—India https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=IN
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [324] Vyas M Impact of lockdown on labour in India Indian J Labour Econ 63 2020 1 5 PMC7474503 32921939 source
- Not checked yetcites [325] Adhikari A Goregaonkar N Narayanan R Panicker N Ramamoorthy N Manufactured maladies: lives and livelihoods of migrant workers during COVID-19 lockdown in India Indian J Labour Econ 63 2020 969 997 33106737 PMC7577364 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“UN Women reported in 2020 that around 70% of health-care workers infected in Spain, Italy, and the United States in the early months of the pandemic were women.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The burdens of long COVID
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [357] UN Women COVID-19: emerging gender data and why it matters https://data.unwomen.org/resources/COVID-19-emerging-gender-data-and-why-it-matters June 26, 2020
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“political leaders and media outlets referred to SARS-CoV-2 as the Chinese virus, and racially motivated crimes against members of the Asian American and Pacific Islander communities in the United States have surged.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [327] Gover AR Harper SB Langton L Anti-Asian hate crime during the COVID-19 pandemic: exploring the reproduction of inequality Am J Crim Justice 45 2020 647 667 32837171 PMC7364747
- Not checked yetcites [328] Zhang Y Zhang L Benton F Hate crimes against Asian Americans Am J Crim Justice 2021 published online Jan 7. 10.1007/s12103-020-09602-9 PMC7790522 33437139
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This syndrome and its underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood, as it affects people regardless of the severity of their COVID-19 infection, including younger adults, children, and those who were not hospitalised.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The burdens of long COVID
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [23] Decary S Dugas M Stefan T Care models for long COVID— a living systematic review. First update—December, 2021. SPOR Evidence Alliance and COVID-END Network https://sporevidencealliance.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Care-Models-for-Long-COVID_Update_2021.12.04.pdf December, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [339] Yong SJ Long COVID or post-COVID-19 syndrome: putative pathophysiology, risk factors, and treatments Infect Dis 53 2021 737 754 PMC8146298 34024217 source
- Not checked yetcites [340] Brackel CLH Lap CR Buddingh EP Pediatric long-COVID: an overlooked phenomenon? Pediatr Pulmonol 56 2021 2495 2502 34102037 PMC8242715 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Some risk factors for long COVID are older age, female sex, having more than five symptoms during the acute stage of the infection, comorbidities including the presence of autoantibodies, and previous psychiatric disorders.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The burdens of long COVID
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [341] Nabavi N Long COVID: how to define it and how to manage it BMJ 370 2020 m3489 32895219 source
- Not checked yetcites [350] Khamsi R Rogue antibodies could be driving severe COVID-19 Nature 590 2021 29 31 33469204 source
- Not checked yetcites [351] Sudre CH Murray B Varsavsky T Attributes and predictors of long COVID Nat Med 27 2021 626 631 33692530 PMC7611399 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“it is suggested that up to 35% of patients who were treated for COVID-19 on an outpatient basis and up to 87% of patients who were hospitalised with COVID-19 have continuing symptoms.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The burdens of long COVID
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [348] Carfì A Bernabei R Landi F Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19 JAMA 324 2020 603 605 32644129 PMC7349096
- Not checked yetcites [349] Tenforde MW Kim SS Lindsell CJ Symptom duration and risk factors for delayed return to usual health among outpatients with COVID-19 in a multistate health care systems network—United States, March–June 2020 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69 2020 993 998 32730238 PMC7392393
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the United States has invested little in community-based public health services, with the preponderance of health outlays directed at health care rather than public health.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The need for strong health systems
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“vaccination against COVID-19 reduces the odds of developing long COVID after infection, and some people who had been infected with COVID-19 before vaccination and had long COVID reported improved symptoms after vaccination.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The burdens of long COVID
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [353] UK Health Security Agency COVID-19 Evidence Team The effectiveness of vaccination against long COVID: a rapid evidence briefing https://ukhsa.koha-ptfs.co.uk/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=64359 February, 2022
- Not checked yetcites [354] Sivan M Greenhalgh T Milne R Delaney B Are vaccines a potential treatment for long COVID? BMJ 377 2022 o988 35584848
- Not checked yetcites [355] Ayoubkhani D Bermingham C Pouwels KB Trajectory of long COVID symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination: community based cohort study BMJ 377 2022 e069676 PMC9115603 35584816
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Reported symptoms of long COVID include fatigue, cough, chest tightness, chest pain, shortness of breath, sore throat, abnormalities of taste and smell, palpitations, myalgia, joint pain, numbness or tingling, skin rashes, hair loss, diarrhoea, urological problems, headache, neurocognitive issues including altered memory and concentration, cognitive blunting (known as brain fog), insomnia, im”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The burdens of long COVID
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [336] Raveendran AV Jayadevan R Sashidharan S Long COVID: an overview Diabetes Metab Syndr 15 2021 869 875 33892403 PMC8056514 source
- Not checked yetcites [341] Nabavi N Long COVID: how to define it and how to manage it BMJ 370 2020 m3489 32895219 source
- Not checked yetcites [342] Aiyegbusi OL Hughes SE Turner G Symptoms, complications and management of long COVID: a review J R Soc Med 114 2021 428 442 34265229 PMC8450986 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In 2019, US public health outlays of $104·5 billion accounted for a mere 2·8% of the total health outlays of $3·759 trillion.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The need for strong health systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [364] Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services National health expenditures by type of service and source of funds, CY 1960–2020 https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/NationalHealthAccountsHistorical
- Not checked yetcites [365] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Health Expenditure https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-expenditure.htm 2021
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“People with long COVID often report impaired quality of life and issues with education and employment.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The burdens of long COVID
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [336] Raveendran AV Jayadevan R Sashidharan S Long COVID: an overview Diabetes Metab Syndr 15 2021 869 875 33892403 PMC8056514 source
- Not checked yetcites [341] Nabavi N Long COVID: how to define it and how to manage it BMJ 370 2020 m3489 32895219 source
- Not checked yetcites [342] Aiyegbusi OL Hughes SE Turner G Symptoms, complications and management of long COVID: a review J R Soc Med 114 2021 428 442 34265229 PMC8450986 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Routine immunisation programmes for children have been disrupted and maternal deaths, stillbirths, ruptured ectopic pregnancies, and maternal depression have increased.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The need for strong health systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [381] WHO At least 80 million children under one at risk of diseases such as diphtheria, measles and polio as COVID-19 disrupts routine vaccination efforts, warn GAVI, WHO and UNICEF https://www.who.int/news/item/22-05-2020-at-least-80-million-children-under-one-at-risk-of-diseases-such-as-diphtheria-measles-and-polio-as-covid-19-disrupts-routine-vaccination-efforts-warn-gavi-who-and-unicef May 22, 2020
- Not checked yetcites [382] Chmielewska B Barratt I Townsend R Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet Glob Health 9 2021 e759 e772 33811827 PMC8012052
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Estimates suggest that in 2020 there were 680 000 deaths from HIV,383 and an excess of 1·4 million tuberculosis deaths, 14 million malaria cases, and 69 000 malaria deaths globally.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The need for strong health systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [383] UNAIDS Global HIV & AIDS statistics—fact sheet https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet
- Not checked yetcites [384] WHO Tuberculosis https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tuberculosis Oct 14, 2021
- Not checked yetcites [385] WHO More malaria cases and deaths in 2020 linked to COVID-19 disruptions https://www.who.int/news/item/06-12-2021-more-malaria-cases-and-deaths-in-2020-linked-to-covid-19-disruptions Dec 6, 2021
hedgedn = 14- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The US Government was also deeply involved in 2020 in funding the rapid development, clinical trials, and production of Moderna's COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, whereas BioNTech received €100 million in financing from the European Investment Bank420 and a €375 million grant from the German government.421”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Rapid vaccine development yet unequal vaccine distribution and uptake
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [420] European Commission Investment Plan for Europe: European Investment Bank to provide BioNTech with up to €100 million in debt financing for COVID-19 vaccine development and manufacturing https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/ro/ip_20_1034 Jan 24, 2022
- Not checked yetcites [421] BioNTech BioNTech to receive up to €375M in funding from German Federal Ministry of Education and Research to support COVID-19 vaccine program BNT162 https://investors.biontech.de/news-releases/news-release-details/biontech-receive-eu375m-funding-german-federal-ministry Sept 15, 2020
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In low-resource settings in particular, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a marked effect on immunisation programmes, maternal mortality, malaria control efforts, and prevention and treatment programmes for tuberculosis and HIV.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The need for strong health systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [381] WHO At least 80 million children under one at risk of diseases such as diphtheria, measles and polio as COVID-19 disrupts routine vaccination efforts, warn GAVI, WHO and UNICEF https://www.who.int/news/item/22-05-2020-at-least-80-million-children-under-one-at-risk-of-diseases-such-as-diphtheria-measles-and-polio-as-covid-19-disrupts-routine-vaccination-efforts-warn-gavi-who-and-unicef May 22, 2020
- Not checked yetcites [382] Chmielewska B Barratt I Townsend R Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet Glob Health 9 2021 e759 e772 33811827 PMC8012052
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many of the individual drug treatment trials for which results are available recruited small numbers of patients, such that the trials were underpowered and were not able to detect useful beneficial effects.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Research governance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Many individual drug treatment trials with available results recruited small numbers of patients, were underpowered, and could not detect useful beneficial effects.
In the paper
“A 2021 study estimates that the NIH spent $17·171 billion between 2000 and 2019 on vaccine platforms, of which an estimated $943 million was spent on mRNA vaccines and another $757 million was spent on vaccines targeting diseases caused by betacoronaviruses.425”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Rapid vaccine development yet unequal vaccine distribution and uptake
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [425] Kiszewski AE Cleary EG Jackson MJ Ledley FD NIH funding for vaccine readiness before the COVID-19 pandemic Vaccine 39 2021 2458 2466 33781600 PMC7938738
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One such example is the controversy around the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine, of which an initial study suggested effectiveness but several subsequent, well designed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) showed no benefit.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Research governance
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The market capitalisation of Moderna increased from around $8 billion at the end of 2019 to $65 billion on Jan 24, 2022.427 Similarly, the market capitalisation of BioNTech increased from around $7 billion at the end of 2019 to $36 billion in January, 2022.428”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Rapid vaccine development yet unequal vaccine distribution and uptake
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [427] Companies Market Cap Market capitalization of Moderna (MRNA) https://companiesmarketcap.com/moderna/marketcap/
- Not checked yetcites [428] Companies Market Cap Market capitalization of BioNTech (BNTX) https://companiesmarketcap.com/biontech/marketcap/
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The United States experienced no growth slowdown (at least based on the World Economic Outlook as of April, 2022), but also had a high level of cumulative deaths per million population.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Pandemic economics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [453] International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook, October 2019: global manufacturing downturn, rising trade barriers https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2019/10/01/world-economic-outlook-october-2019 October, 2019
- Not checked yetcites [454] International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook, April 2022: war sets back the global recovery https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2022/04/19/world-economic-outlook-april-2022 April, 2022
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“By the end of the year, COVAX had delivered nearly 1 billion doses to 144 countries, and monthly deliveries were increasing and becoming more predictable, reaching 347 million doses in December, 2021.439”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The travails of COVAX
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [439] UNICEF COVID-19 vaccine market dashboard https://www.unicef.org/supply/covid-19-vaccine-market-dashboard Jan 27, 2022
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Global output in 2020 contracted by 3·1%, with losses particularly severe among advanced economies, which implemented the strictest lockdowns.451”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Pandemic economics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [451] International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook October 2021: recovery during a pandemic—health concerns, supply disruptions, and price pressures https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2021/10/12/world-economic-outlook-october-2021 October, 2021
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Analysis of COVID-19 trials shows substantial imbalances between the numbers of drug trials (2465), vaccine trials (109), and public health trials (16), with public health trials in particular being under-represented.445”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Research governance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [445] Behavioural, Environmental, Social and Systems Interventions Behavioural, Environmental, Social and Systems Interventions (for pandemic preparedness) https://www.bessi-collab.net/ 32723732
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The US Government in fact proposed new World Trade Organization rules to facilitate compulsory licensing of the intellectual property of COVID-19 vaccines,433 but was met with initial strong resistance from European governments.434”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Rapid vaccine development yet unequal vaccine distribution and uptake
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [433] United States Trade Representative Statement from Ambassador Katherine Tai on the COVID-19 trips waiver https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2021/may/statement-ambassador-katherine-tai-covid-19-trips-waiver May 5, 2021
- Not checked yetcites [434] EuroNews, AP COVID-19 vaccine patents: EU nations divided over lifting intellectual property rights May 17, 2021 EuroNews https://www.euronews.com/2021/05/06/us-backs-waiver-on-intellectual-property-rights-for-covid-19-vaccines
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“by September, 2022, more than 12·6 billion doses of a COVID-19 vaccine had been administered worldwide, with roughly 8·8 million doses administered every day.424”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Rapid vaccine development yet unequal vaccine distribution and uptake
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [424] Bloomberg UK More than 12.6 billion shots given: COVID-19 tracker https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/covid-vaccine-tracker-global-distribution/
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As of January, 2022, the percentage of the population that was fully vaccinated was 71% in the EU and 63% in the United States, but only 10% in Africa and even lower in many countries, such as 2% in Nigeria (figure 17 ).181”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The travails of COVAX
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [181] Our World in Data Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccinations https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In October, 2021, WHO called for every country to fully vaccinate at least 40% of their population by the end of the year;437 however, this goal was missed,438”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The travails of COVAX
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [437] WHO Strategy to achieve global COVID-19 vaccination by mid-2022 https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/strategy-to-achieve-global-covid-19-vaccination-by-mid-2022 Oct 6, 2021
- Not checked yetcites [438] Aizenman N The goal: at least 40% vaxxed in all nations by year-end. This map shows how we stand Dec 30, 2021 NPR https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2021/12/30/1068920127/the-goal-at-least-40-vaxxed-in-all-nations-by-year-end-this-map-shows-how-we-sta
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although employment levels recovered in many advanced economies in 2021 (except among workers with lower levels of education), emerging markets had more persistent employment losses as of March, 2022.455”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Pandemic economics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [455] International Monetary Fund G-20 surveillance note https://www.imf.org/external/np/g20/021622.htm February, 2022
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Despite having had a decisive role in funding the development of these vaccines, the US Government did not share in the market returns, and indeed purchased the vaccines from these companies on a commercial basis.429”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Rapid vaccine development yet unequal vaccine distribution and uptake
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [429] Stevis-Gridneff M Sanger-Katz M Weiland N A European official reveals a secret: the U.S. is paying more for coronavirus vaccines June 9, 2021 The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/18/upshot/coronavirus-vaccines-prices-europe-united-states.html
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The National Bureau of Economic Research Dating Committee asserts that the contraction was limited to March and April, 2020.452”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Pandemic economics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [452] National Bureau of Economic Research US business cycle expansions and contractions https://www.nber.org/research/data/us-business-cycle-expansions-and-contractions July 19, 2021
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Universities and companies then exercise monopoly rights to the technologies under patent, and charge prices for vaccine doses that are much greater than the actual costs of manufacturing.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Rapid vaccine development yet unequal vaccine distribution and uptake
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Universities and companies charge vaccine prices much greater than actual manufacturing costs.
In the paper
“One study from early in the pandemic put the VSL in the United States at $4·5 million per life lost in 2020, considering age-specific mortality rates.456”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Pandemic economics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [456] Greenstone M Nigam V Does social distancing matter? https://bfi.uchicago.edu/insight/finding/does-social-distancing-matter/ March 27, 2020
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In most countries, and in all WHO regions, actual growth was lower than had been predicted in the months before the pandemic.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Pandemic economics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [453] International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook, October 2019: global manufacturing downturn, rising trade barriers https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2019/10/01/world-economic-outlook-october-2019 October, 2019
- Not checked yetcites [454] International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook, April 2022: war sets back the global recovery https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2022/04/19/world-economic-outlook-april-2022 April, 2022
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Only three of the 16 trials of preventive interventions involved public health and social approaches: two RCTs on the effectiveness of wearing face masks and one RCT on physical distancing.448, 449”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Research governance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [448] Bundgaard H Bundgaard JS Raaschou-Pedersen DET Effectiveness of adding a mask recommendation to other public health measures to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in Danish mask wearers: a randomized controlled trial Ann Intern Med 174 2021 335 343 33205991 PMC7707213
- Not checked yetcites [449] Abaluck J Kwong LH Styczynski A Impact of community masking on COVID-19: a cluster-randomized trial in Bangladesh Science 375 2022 eabi9069 PMC9036942 34855513
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The recessions induced by COVID-19 in many countries in 2020 were accompanied by substantial employment losses (figure 18 ). These losses were particularly large in emerging markets and differed in terms of the age and education level of the workers affected.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Pandemic economics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [455] International Monetary Fund G-20 surveillance note https://www.imf.org/external/np/g20/021622.htm February, 2022
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Despite many examples of research excellence during the pandemic, there has also been poor-quality research, subject to biases and with misleading results.440, 441”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Research governance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [440] InterAcademy Partnership Strengthening research on COVID-19 during the pandemic https://www.interacademies.org/publication/strengthening-research-covid-19-during-pandemic May, 2021
- Not checked yetcites [441] Global Commission on Evidence to Address Societal Challenges The Evidence Commission report: a wake-up call and path forward for decisionmakers, evidence intermediaries, and impact-oriented evidence producers https://www.mcmasterforum.org/networks/evidence-commission/report/english 2022
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As a result, COVAX was chronically short of vaccine supplies for LMICs, and was further unable to set dates and plans for vaccine delivery and use.435”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The travails of COVAX
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [435] Usher AD A beautiful idea: how COVAX has fallen short Lancet 397 2021 2322 2325 34147145 PMC8494620
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moderna's first grant from the Department of Defense (through the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) was in 2013,422 US Department of Health and Human Services funding dates to 2016,423 and $2·5 billion of funding in 2020 came from the US Department of Health and Human Services and the NIH.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Rapid vaccine development yet unequal vaccine distribution and uptake
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [422] PRNewswire DARPA awards Moderna Therapeutics a grant for up to $25 million to develop messenger RNA therapeutics™ https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/darpa-awards-moderna-therapeutics-a-grant-for-up-to-25-million-to-develop-messenger-rna-therapeutics-226115821.html Oct 2, 2013
- Not checked yetcites [423] Moderna mRNA Strategic collaborators: government organizations https://test.modernatx.com/ecosystem/strategic-collaborators/mrna-strategic-collaborators-government-organizations 2021
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Central banks around the world reacted swiftly to unprecedented financial disturbances in March, 2020.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Global finance and the pandemic
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Central banks around the world reacted swiftly to unprecedented financial disturbances in March 2020.
In the paper
“Total official development assistance for health, as measured by the OECD Development Assistance Committee, came to a mere $23 billion as of 2019, or less than 0·05% of the GDP of donor governments.465”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Global health financing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [465] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Aid by DAC members increases in 2019 with more aid to the poorest countries https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-data/ODA-2019-detailed-summary.pdf April 16, 2020
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A 2022 analysis shows that the pandemic economic recovery packages of the G20 countries, totalling $14 trillion, allocated only 6% of total stimulus spending to areas that reduced emissions, and 3% was allocated to activities that will increase emissions.486”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Long-term economic and sustainable development recovery from the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [486] Nahm JM Miller SM Urpelainen J G20's US$14-trillion economic stimulus reneges on emissions pledges Nature 603 2022 28 31 35236968
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The multilateral development banks similarly provided too little health financing, and too slowly, to make up the pandemic financing gap.470”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Global health financing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [470] Okonjo-Iweala N Shanmugaratnam T Summers LH Rethinking multilateralism for a pandemic era https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2021/12/Multilateralism-Pandemic-Era-Okonjo-Iweala-Shanmugaratnam-Summers December 2021
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Health financing nowadays is primarily covered by national (domestic) resources, which includes government and private health expenditure in addition to out-of-pocket spending, with only very modest levels of international support by donors for LMICs.463, 464”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Global health financing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [463] Development Initiatives Aid spent on health: ODA data on donors, sectors, recipients https://devinit.org/resources/aid-spent-health-oda-data-donors-sectors-recipients/ July 24, 2020
- Not checked yetcites [464] Micah AE Cogswell IE Cunningham B Tracking development assistance for health and for COVID-19: a review of development assistance, government, out-of-pocket, and other private spending on health for 204 countries and territories, 1990–2050 Lancet 398 2021 1317 1343 34562388 PMC8457757
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The World Bank approved a $14 billion fast-track facility for health emergency response on March 2, 2020, and this facility supported more than 100 countries with credits and grants within the subsequent 3-month period through the global health multiphase programmatic approach.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Global finance and the pandemic
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The World Bank approved a $14 billion fast-track facility for health emergency response on March 2, 2020, supporting more than 100 countries with credits and grants within 3 months.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The Global Fund and the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations have each saved tens of millions of lives with modest outlays of a few billion dollars per year.466, 467, 468”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Global health financing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [466] The Global Fund Results report https://www.theglobalfund.org/en/results/ 2021
- Not checked yetcites [467] Friebel R Silverman R Glassman A Chalkidou K On results reporting and evidentiary standards: spotlight on the Global Fund Lancet 393 2019 2006 2008 30691700
- Not checked yetcites [468] Zerhouni E GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance Cell 179 2019 13 17 31519310
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The World Bank also approved $12 billion for financing vaccine procurement and delivery in early October, 2020, even though these resources were limited by their requirement to be allocated on an individual-country basis.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Global finance and the pandemic
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The World Bank approved $12 billion for financing vaccine procurement and delivery in early October 2020, though resources were limited by individual-country allocation requirements.
In the paper
“Island countries in the Caribbean are a case in point,457 with countries in this region experiencing some of the largest GDP declines in the world in 2020: Aruba, −22%; Saint Lucia, −20%; Antigua and Barbuda, −20%; and Barbados, −18%, compared with declines of less than 5% in most high-income countries.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Pandemic economics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [457] Mooney H Rosenblatt D Ortiz de Mendívil C Caribbean Quarterly Bulletin: the fragile path to recovery August, 2021 Inter-American Development Bank https://publications.iadb.org/en/caribbean-quarterly-bulletin-volume-10-issue-2-august-2021
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The IMF has established that what are classified as low-income developing countries—a group of 57 low-income and lower-middle-income developing countries—face a financing gap of $300 billion–$500 billion per year to achieve the SDGs, and this gap has increased as a result of the pandemic.476, 477”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Long-term economic and sustainable development recovery from the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [476] Gaspar V Amaglobeli D Garcia-Escribano M Prady D Soto M Fiscal policy and development: human, social, and physical investment for the SDGs https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Staff-Discussion-Notes/Issues/2019/01/18/Fiscal-Policy-and-Development-Human-Social-and-Physical-Investments-for-the-SDGs-46444 Jan 23, 2019
- Not checked yetcites [477] Benedek D Gemayel ER Senhadji AS Tieman AF A post-pandemic assessment of the Sustainable Development Goals https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Staff-Discussion-Notes/Issues/2021/04/27/A-Post-Pandemic-Assessment-of-the-Sustainable-Development-Goals-460076 April 27, 2021
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The creation of the Access to COVID-19 Tools (ACT) Accelerator and COVAX in April, 2020 aimed to accomplish the same results for COVID-19, but both fell far short.469”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Global health financing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [469] Dalberg ACT-Accelerator strategic review https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/act-accelerator-strategic-review Oct 8, 2021
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“an analysis of recovery packages of European countries found that issues such as the agrifood system, circular economy, and nature-based solutions have received little attention so far, although many of these countries have relatively poor performance on such challenges.487”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Long-term economic and sustainable development recovery from the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [487] Lafortune G Cortés Puch M Mosnier A Europe Sustainable Development Report 2021: transforming the European Union to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals https://www.sdgindex.org/esdr2021 Dec 14, 2021
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“G20 countries also offered some relief via the Debt Service Suspension Initiative, which provided almost $13 billion in relief to 48 eligible countries before it expired at the end of 2021.461”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Global finance and the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [461] The World Bank Debt service suspension initiative https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/debt/brief/covid-19-debt-service-suspension-initiative March 10, 2022
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“doing so would have led to more successful implementation of public health interventions and helped to increase social trust, prosociality, equity, and wellbeing.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Methodology
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This strategy is highly problematic for COVID-19, because many infected people will die of the disease, and many who survive have what is known as long COVID.23”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Four COVID-19 control regimes
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [23] Decary S Dugas M Stefan T Care models for long COVID— a living systematic review. First update—December, 2021. SPOR Evidence Alliance and COVID-END Network https://sporevidencealliance.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Care-Models-for-Long-COVID_Update_2021.12.04.pdf December, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Economic recovery depends on sustaining high rates of vaccination coverage and low rates of new, clinically significant COVID-19 infections, and on fiscal and monetary policies to mitigate the socioeconomic effects of the pandemic and prevent a financial crisis.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Methodology
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second is the limited control case in which R is reduced to less than R 0=2·4 but remains greater than 1. In this case, the epidemic still grows exponentially, but less rapidly than with no control measures. The peak in the number of new infections per day is lower and occurs later than in the uncontrolled case.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Four COVID-19 control regimes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In short, pandemic control is based heavily on prosocial actions by individuals (eg, getting tested, keeping a physical distance, and isolating when infective), and these individual measures rely heavily on public policies (eg, trusted information for the community, access to testing sites, and an economic framework such as guaranteed paid leave) to support self-isolation.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Rapid response to a new outbreak to control community transmission
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“To accomplish these five pillars requires an ethical framework of prosociality—the orientation of individuals and government regulations to the needs of society as a whole, rather than to narrow individual interests.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Five pillars of the successful fight against emerging infectious diseases
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Jensen K Prosociality Curr Biol 26 2016 R748 R752 27554648 source
- Not checked yetcites [6] Dinić BM Bodroža B COVID-19 protective behaviors are forms of prosocial and unselfish behaviors Front Psychol 12 2021 647710 PMC8062771 33897553 source
- Not matchedcites [7] Santamaría-García H Burgaleta M Legaz A The price of prosociality in pandemic times Humanit Soc Sci Commun 9 2022 15
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [8] Campos-Mercade P Meier AN Schneider FH Wengström E Prosociality predicts health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic J Public Econ 195 2021 104367 PMC7842154 33531719 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The five-pillar framework captures the essential components of a successful fight against emerging infectious diseases.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Identification of the origin of the virus will help to prevent future pandemics and strengthen public trust in science and public authorities.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Methodology
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rapid development of multiple vaccines has been a triumph of the research and development system and the result of long-standing public and private investment and cooperation.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Methodology
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This opposition reflects a lack of social trust, low confidence in government advice, inconsistency of government advice, low health literacy, lack of sufficient behavioural-change interventions, and extensive misinformation and disinformation campaigns on social media.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Methodology
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“With intensive contact tracing and the isolation of infected individuals, in addition to the implementation of a range of public health and social measures,21 the effective reproduction rate can be reduced to less than 1, and the epidemic will decline.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Four COVID-19 control regimes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] Ayouni I Maatoug J Dhouib W Effective public health measures to mitigate the spread of COVID-19: a systematic review BMC Public Health 21 2021 1015 PMC8164261 34051769 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The eventual (cumulative) number of cases of infection during the epidemic is nearly the same as in the uncontrolled epidemic, but the infections are spread out over a longer time, and therefore put less pressure on the capacity of hospital and health-care systems at any given time.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Four COVID-19 control regimes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] Anderson RM Heesterbeek H Klinkenberg D Hollingsworth TD How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? Lancet 395 2020 931 934 32164834 PMC7158572 source
- Not matchedcites [25] Thunström L Newbold S Finnoff D Ashworth M Shogren J The benefits and costs of using social distancing to flatten the curve for COVID-19 J Benefit Cost Anal 11 2020 179 195
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are two leading hypotheses: that the virus emerged as a zoonotic spillover from wildlife or a farm animal, possibly through a wet market, in a location that is still undetermined; or that the virus emerged from a research-related incident, during the field collection of viruses or through a laboratory-associated escape.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Methodology
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Because betacoronaviruses related to SARS-CoV-2 are found across east Asia,63 the search for a natural source of SARS-CoV-2 should continue with high focus and intensity, as the eventual discovery of a natural reservoir of the virus might occur only after years of searching, and quite possibly outside of China.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [63] Frutos R Serra-Cobo J Pinault L Lopez Roig M Devaux CA Emergence of bat-related betacoronaviruses: hazard and risks Front Microbiol 12 2021 591535 PMC8005542 33790874 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Identifying these origins would provide greater clarity into not only the causes of the current pandemic but also vulnerabilities to future outbreaks and strategies to prevent them.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A successful long-term exit from a containment strategy (ie, lifting of the containment measures) depends on the successful containment of transmission in the rest of the world, or on sufficient protection from vaccinations and highly effective therapeutics to tolerate a subsequent spread of the virus without incurring high death rates and serious disease.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Four COVID-19 control regimes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yet this argument of futility misses an essential point, which is that a major purpose of suppression strategies is to buy time until the arrival of better tools—such as vaccines and therapeutics—at which time the response can be re-evaluated and perhaps eased.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Four COVID-19 control regimes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The two subpathways for a natural spillover are direct bat-to-human transmission and transmission from bat to intermediate host to human.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The herd-immunity strategy might be adopted if policy measures to reduce transmission are believed to be too onerous, too costly, or too ineffective to justify any steps to reduce R, or if the burden of infection in terms of deaths and illness is viewed as too small to justify any control measures.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Four COVID-19 control regimes
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Furin cleavage sites are found naturally in almost every family of coronavirus,50, 51 although they have not been observed in other SARS-related coronaviruses (subgenus Sarbecoronavirus).”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [50] Wu Y Zhao S Furin cleavage sites naturally occur in coronaviruses Stem Cell Res 50 2020 102115 PMC7836551 33340798 source
- Not checked yetcites [51] Liu X Wu Q Zhang Z Global diversification and distribution of coronaviruses with furin cleavage sites Front Microbiol 12 2021 649314 PMC8529245 34690939 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The herd-immunity strategy downplays not only the deaths but also the serious disease burden of long COVID.29”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Four COVID-19 control regimes
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [29] Bacon SL Ribero PAB Stojanovic J Joyal-Desmarais K Vieira AM Yip D Change in the level of vaccine protection over time in COVID-19 vaccinated individuals: a rapid review. SPOR Evidence Alliance and COVID-END https://sporevidencealliance.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Waning-Vaccine-Effectiveness_Update-1-Report_2021.11.26.pdf November, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The proper use of lockdowns is to serve as a temporary expedient to provide time for national health systems to build up and enable a more comprehensive set of public health and social measures, so that less disruptive measures—such as testing, contact tracing, and isolation—are in place after the lockdown is lifted.30”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Four COVID-19 control regimes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [30] Muehlschlegel PA Parkinson EA Chan RY Arden MA Armitage CJ Learning from previous lockdown measures and minimising harmful biopsychosocial consequences as they end: a systematic review J Glob Health 11 2021 05008 PMC8141332 34055328 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even if a full-scale epidemic eventually arises, the temporary suppression of the epidemic by a year or two can buy time for mass vaccinations or the arrival of effective therapeutics, thereby saving lives and avoiding long-term health effects.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Four COVID-19 control regimes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In both cases, bats serve as the primary evolutionary source of the virus.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Fourth, by means of aggressive testing, contact tracing, and isolating, R is kept near 0. This strategy, which is sometimes called a containment strategy and was known in China as a zero-COVID strategy, can be viewed as an intensive application of the suppression strategy.28 In principle, deaths can be kept to near zero, and infections can be held to a very small portion of the population.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Four COVID-19 control regimes
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [28] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Flattening the COVID-19 peak: containment and mitigation policies https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/flattening-the-covid-19-peak-containment-and-mitigation-policies-e96a4226/ March 24, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because both the pathways of natural transmission and of research-related transmission are feasible, preventing the emergence of future pandemic pathogens must include two distinct strategies: the prevention of natural (zoonotic) transmission and the prevention of research-related spillovers.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additionally, encouraging prosocial behaviour during pandemics and beyond is valuable for mental and physical health, which could help to address the pervasive adverse effects of the pandemic on mental health, particularly during lockdown.31, 32, 33, 34”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Prosociality for pandemic control
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [31] Office for Health Improvement and Disparities Important findings. In: COVID-19 mental health and wellbeing surveillance: report https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-mental-health-and-wellbeing-surveillance-report/2-important-findings-so-far April 12, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [32] Aknin LB Whillans AV Norton MI Dunn EW Happiness and prosocial behavior: an evaluation of the evidence. In: World Happiness Report https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2019/happiness-and-prosocial-behavior-an-evaluation-of-the-evidence/ 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [33] Rhoads SA Gunter D Ryan RM Marsh AA Global variation in subjective well-being predicts seven forms of altruism Psychol Sci 32 2021 1247 1261 34237223 source
- Not checked yetcites [34] Brethel-Haurwitz KM Marsh AA Geographical differences in subjective well-being predict extraordinary altruism Psychol Sci 25 2014 762 771 24477966 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Travel bans introduced by countries pursuing a suppression strategy could control the spread from a few recalcitrant countries with little international movement of people, but if even a few countries that host large numbers of international travellers fail to adopt suppression policies, most or all other countries will find continuing with such policies difficult.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Prosociality for pandemic control
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, if circulation of the virus is not brought to zero, and infected people continue to arrive from other areas, this strategy needs to be implemented on an ongoing basis to contain each new outbreak in the community, and becomes progressively more difficult as highly transmissible variants emerge.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Four COVID-19 control regimes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“One lesson from experimental research on weakest-link games is that when the game is played by just two players, or a small number greater than two, it is relatively straightforward for the players to align on the best strategy. However, when there are many players, the observed outcome often is highly inefficient.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Prosociality for pandemic control
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A strategic dilemma results in which each government will follow a suppression strategy only if the other government also does so, but each government will adopt less effective control measures if the other government does so.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Prosociality for pandemic control
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because both severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome result from natural spillovers of betacoronaviruses, the outbreaks of these diseases gave rise to concerns that future such spillovers would occur.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In technical game theoretic terms, there are two Nash equilibria in pure strategies (suppression by both or limited control by both), with the suppression strategy Pareto-dominating the limited control equilibrium.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 1: conceptual framework for understanding pandemics > Prosociality for pandemic control
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As laboratory technologies have rapidly advanced, many scientists have warned of the increasing risks of undersupervised and under-regulated genetic manipulation of SARS-CoV-like viruses and other potential pandemic pathogens.65”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] Inglesby TV Lipsitch M Proposed changes to U.S. policy on potential pandemic pathogen oversight and implementation MSphere 5 2020 e00919 e00990 PMC6977183 31969482
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Time is of the essence when a new infectious pathogen emerges.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Early response to the COVID-19 outbreak in China and globally
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, precise dating is helpful in discerning the most likely proximal origin of the virus.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Early response to the COVID-19 outbreak in China and globally
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Articles 21(a) and 22 of the WHO Constitution assign the World Health Assembly (WHA) the authority to adopt regulations “designed to prevent the international spread of disease”.84”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [84] WHO Constitution of the World Health Organization, 45th edn https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/constitution-of-the-world-health-organization Oct 9, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“WHO was hesitant to act on these potentially grave risks until the uncertainties over viral transmission were better resolved, and was therefore slow to advocate policy responses commensurate with the actual dangers of the virus.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Laboratory experiments included the creation of novel viruses (eg, so-called consensus viruses that average the genetic code across a set of natural viruses), the mutation of viruses (such as through the insertion of a furin cleavage site), the creation of chimeric viruses, and the serial passaging of viruses through cell cultures to test their transmissibility, virulence, immunogenicity, and host”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These regulations remain in force for all WHO member states after adoption by the WHA, aside from member states that affirmatively opt out of the regulations within a prescribed period.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These regulations, known as the International Health Regulations (IHR), were first adopted in 1969 and have been amended three times, most recently in 2005 after the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although over-reaction can be politically embarrassing, the COVID-19 pandemic has shown that centralised under-reaction can be devastating.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The foreword of the IHR (2005) notes seven areas of revision and improvement of previous versions of the IHR, notably: (1) a wide scope of application, (2) obligations of member states to develop minimum core public health capacities, (3) responsibilities of member states to notify WHO of events that could constitute a public health emergency, (4) provisions authorising WHO to consider unofficial”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [85] WHO International Health Regulations 3rd edn. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241580496 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There is no doubt that false alarms about emerging infectious diseases can be politically costly, as was seen during the H1N1 influenza scare in 1976—an epidemic that never occurred91, 92—and the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, which ultimately had a relatively low mortality rate of 0·1–0·7%.93”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Sencer DJ Millar JD Reflections on the 1976 swine flu vaccination program Emerg Infect Dis 12 2006 29 33 16494713 PMC3291400 source
- Not checked yetcites [92] Krause R The swine flu episode and the fog of epidemics Emerg Infect Dis 12 2006 40 43 16494715 PMC3291407 source
- Not matchedcites [93] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2009 H1N1 pandemic (H1N1pdm09 virus) https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/2009-h1n1-pandemic.html 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The late economist Richard Cooper argued that successful intergovernmental cooperation was in fact pioneered in an 1851 international conference on epidemic control, which led to the founding of the International Office of Public Hygiene in 1907, the precursor of WHO.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a general matter, governance of WHO by the WHA, composed of the health ministers of each member state, proved to be inadequate for pandemic response for at least three reasons. First, the WHA meets only annually, whereas a pandemic requires daily hands-on action. Second, the WHA is too large a body to take executive decisions on behalf of the 193 WHO member states. Third, health ministers lack”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Research that can increase the transmissibility and virulence of pathogens is called gain-of-function research of concern, although which specific experiments should fall into this category is contested by scientists.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“In part, WHO fell victim to the increasing tensions between the United States and China, including the announcement in May, 2020, that the United States intended to withdraw from WHO, effective July, 202186—a decision that was later rescinded.87”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [86] Rogers K Mandavilli A Trump administration signals formal withdrawal from W.H.O The New York Times July 7, 2020 https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/07/us/politics/coronavirus-trump-who.html
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [87] Keaton J Biden's US revives support for WHO, reversing Trump retreat Jan 21, 2021 Associated Press https://apnews.com/article/us-who-support-006ed181e016afa55d4cea30af236227
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The early outbreak in Wuhan coincided with the Chinese Lunar New Year, involving extensive travel within China and large gatherings of people, which in turn could have facilitated the early spread of the virus to other parts of China and to other countries.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Early response to the COVID-19 outbreak in China and globally
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“WHO was established in 1948 and is now the central organising body for global cooperation on health.82, 83”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [82] Cooper RN International economic cooperation: is it desirable? Is it likely? Bull Am Acad Arts Sci 39 1985 11 35
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [83] Cooper RN International cooperation in public health as a prologue to macroeconomic cooperation Cooper RN Eichengreen B Holtham G Putnam RD Henning CR Can nations agree? Issues in International Economic Cooperation 1989 Brookings Institution Press Washington, DC
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such a pathway could have involved a researcher becoming infected in the field or in the laboratory with a natural virus, or becoming infected in the laboratory with a genetically manipulated virus.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The origins of SARS-CoV-2
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incorrect assumptions about airborne transmission persisted in the form of continued misallocation of time, energy, and resources, enabling the virus to continue to spread, almost unabated, for months.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The second method is spray transmission, in which large droplets—large respiratory particles (>100 μm in diameter) that fall quickly to the ground (usually within 2 m of the source)—land directly on the mucous membranes of a susceptible person in the near-field.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > A paradigm shift in how we view and address the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, the greater frequency of transmission by close contact, combined with a desire of scientists to refute miasma theory—the prevailing theory of the transmission of respiratory infectious disease from the mid-to-late 19th century, in which vague explanations for the causes of disease, such as so-called bad air, were perpetuated with little to no causative basis136—led to the desire to”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > A paradigm shift in how we view and address the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [136] Randall K Ewing ET Marr LC Jimenez JL Bourouiba L How did we get here: what are droplets and aerosols and how far do they go? A historical perspective on the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases Interface Focus 11 2021 20210049 PMC8504878 34956601 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although transmission can occur through touch, it is rare for respiratory viruses, and touch and spray transmission are not likely to contribute to widespread transmission or superspreading events.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > A paradigm shift in how we view and address the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As nearly all transmission occurs indoors, the way in which we design and operate building ventilation and filtration systems can reduce transmission.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > A paradigm shift in how we view and address the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Nearly all SARS-CoV-2 transmission occurs indoors.
In the paper
“With this perspective, the IHR (2005) does not recommend travel restrictions and requires countries that adopt them to provide the public health rationale and relevant scientific information.100”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [100] von Tigerstrom B Wilson K COVID-19 travel restrictions and the International Health Regulations (2005) BMJ Glob Health 5 2020 e002629 PMC7237384 32424016
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This delay contributed to the spread of the virus and limited the possibilities for risk mitigation.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Therefore, although transmission via the airborne route by virus-laden aerosol can occur both in the near-field and in the far-field, the risk of near-field transmission for a single person in proximity to an infected person is generally greater than the risk of far-field transmission.134”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > A paradigm shift in how we view and address the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [134] Chen W Zhang N Wei J Yen HL Li Y Short-range airborne route dominates exposure of respiratory infection during close contact Build Environ 176 2020 106859 PMC9085449 35574565
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In fact, much of the close transmission is through aerosols, because people release considerable quantities of aerosol in addition to large droplets, especially when talking and coughing,133 and also because aerosol is most concentrated close to the source, like cigarette smoke particles near a smoker.134, 135”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > A paradigm shift in how we view and address the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [133] Bourouiba L The fluid dynamics of disease transmission Annu Rev Fluid Mech 53 2021 473 508
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [134] Chen W Zhang N Wei J Yen HL Li Y Short-range airborne route dominates exposure of respiratory infection during close contact Build Environ 176 2020 106859 PMC9085449 35574565
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [135] Cortellessa G Stabile L Arpino F Close proximity risk assessment for SARS-CoV-2 infection Sci Total Environ 794 2021 148749 PMC8242194 34225157 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The third method of transmission occurs through touch, or indirect contact via a contaminated object known as a fomite, in which pathogens are transferred—usually by hand—to the mucous membranes of a susceptible person.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > A paradigm shift in how we view and address the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Border measures can work only if they are timely, comprehensive, and complemented by policies to suppress local outbreaks that will continue to occur even with comprehensive travel measures.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > WHO at the centre of global cooperation and early shortcomings
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The first and main method is airborne transmission, which occurs through the inhalation of viruses carried in microscopic respiratory particles (≤100 μm in diameter) suspended in the air, known as aerosols.117 This transmission can occur both in the near-field (within the vicinity of the infection source) and in the far-field (greater distances from the infection source).”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > A paradigm shift in how we view and address the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [117] Marr LC Tang JW A paradigm shift to align transmission routes with mechanisms Clin Infect Dis 73 2021 1747 1749 34415335 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The high mortality rate of the region of the Americas reflects the failures of this region to take concrete measures to suppress the epidemic, and high vulnerability to deaths from COVID-19 due to structural characteristics.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“National governments have failed to perceive, or to articulate, the core logic of a weakest-link game: to successfully control the transmission of the virus, each country is dependent upon the actions of other countries, so a cooperative approach is necessary to achieve the desired outcome.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional differences in mortality rates
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria (known as the Global Fund) partnered with countries to reprogramme up to 5% of their current grants towards supporting COVID-19 responses”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Failures and successes of international cooperation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [145] The Global Fund Our response to COVID-19 https://www.theglobalfund.org/en/covid-19/
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The Economist 147 estimates a death toll of 19·4 million as of February, 2022”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional differences in mortality rates
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [147] The pandemic's true death toll Nov 2, 2021 The Economist https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/coronavirus-excess-deaths-estimates
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The 2019 assessment failed to predict the poor quality of the public policy response to the pandemic in the European region and the region of the Americas, and the much higher quality of response in the Western Pacific region.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional differences in mortality rates
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The median age in Africa is around 18 years, compared with between 30 years and 35 years across Asia, the Americas, and Oceania, and around 42 years in Europe.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [188] Desjardins J Mapped: the median age of the population on every continent https://www.visualcapitalist.com/mapped-the-median-age-of-every-continent/ Feb 15, 2019
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“during the first few months of 2020, the rate of testing was very low and tests were only available sporadically.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [159] Shear MD Goodnough A Kaplan S Fink S Thomas K Weiland N The lost month: how a failure to test blinded the U.S. to COVID-19 March 28, 2020 The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/28/us/testing-coronavirus-pandemic.html
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [160] Solinas-Saunders M The U.S. federal response to COVID-19 during the first 3 months of the outbreak: was an evidence-based approach an option? Am Rev Public Adm 50 2020 713 719
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [161] Schuchat A Public health response to the initiation and spread of pandemic COVID-19 in the United States, February 24–April 21, 2020 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69 2020 551 556 32379733 PMC7737947 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alas, WHO was slow to acknowledge the airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2, and was therefore slow to emphasise the range of measures needed to limit indoor transmission.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > A paradigm shift in how we view and address the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the decline in the number of cases by June, 2020 led governments in Europe to rescind control measures and to encourage a return to life as usual, especially in the context of Europe's upcoming summer holidays; this relaxing of control measures led to another wave of infections in countries across Europe in September, 2020.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [179] European Commission Tourism and Transport Package https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/QANDA_20_870 May 13, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [180] Hodcroft EB Zuber M Nadeau S Spread of a SARS-CoV-2 variant through Europe in the summer of 2020 Nature 595 2021 707 712 34098568 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Because the risk of severe disease and death from COVID-19 increases exponentially with age,189 it is not surprising that Africa—and sub-Saharan Africa in particular—has recorded relatively fewer deaths, despite very limited containment policies and generally inadequate health systems.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [189] Goldstein JR Lee RD Demographic perspectives on the mortality of COVID-19 and other epidemics Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117 2020 22035 22041 32820077 PMC7486771 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fourth, high infection rates mean high rates of long COVID, which disrupts education and jobs, brings physical and mental suffering to individuals and their families, creates a considerable burden on health services, and undermines economic recovery.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Premature lifting of public health and social measures
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, further variants and returning waves of infection can be expected as current immunity wanes, so dismantling basic controls and even advertising the end of the pandemic is premature, and likely to be harmful when restrictions become necessary again.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Premature lifting of public health and social measures
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Some media outlets erroneously promoted dangerous or experimental treatments, such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, resulting in unnecessary visits to hospital emergency departments and shortages of such medications for people with legitimate needs.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Disinformation in media
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [239] Nelson JQ Hydroxychloroquine could save up to 100,000 lives if used for COVID-19: Yale epidemiology professor July 21, 2020 Fox News https://www.foxnews.com/media/hydroxychloroquine-could-save-lives-ingraham-yale-professor
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [240] South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control The dangers of using hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin for preventing or treating COVID-19 https://scdhec.gov/covid19/dangers-using-hydroxychloroquine-ivermectin-preventing-or-treating-covid-19
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [241] Mendel A Bernatsky S Askanase A Hydroxychloroquine shortages among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Ann Rheum Dis 80 2021 1 2 32586918 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“First, a considerable portion of the population is not immunised, and many vulnerable groups—such as people who are immunocompromised and who cannot mount an effective immune response to vaccination—will never be able to achieve effective immunity.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Premature lifting of public health and social measures
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [207] Moayyedi P The effects of vaccination in immunocompromised pediatric people https://www.mcmasterforum.org/docs/default-source/product-documents/rapid-responses/the-effects-of-vaccination-in-immunocompromised-pediatric-people.pdf?sfvrsn=f8c1fe0d_11 Jan 3, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The COM-B model252 is a synthesis of frameworks of behaviour change has identified nine types of intervention strategy and seven policy options to underpin them.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Public attitudes towards pandemic control and investments in behavioural sciences
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [252] Michie S van Stralen MM West R The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions Implement Sci 6 2011 42 21513547 PMC3096582
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Motivations for behaviour change include self-interest, belief in the effectiveness and feasibility of behaviours, and reducing aversive emotions.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Public attitudes towards pandemic control and investments in behavioural sciences
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Capability includes knowing exactly what to do, when, and why, and is closely linked to health literacy.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Public attitudes towards pandemic control and investments in behavioural sciences
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At a minimum, behavioural change requires appropriate motivation, capability, and opportunity; the absence of any one of these will undermine public health efforts.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Public attitudes towards pandemic control and investments in behavioural sciences
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [252] Michie S van Stralen MM West R The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions Implement Sci 6 2011 42 21513547 PMC3096582
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The rapid speed at which news is shared, the deliberate spread of misinformation and disinformation by political leaders, and the lack of truth-telling and adequate oversight creates an overwhelming environment that fosters distrust in health officials and promotes the idea that individual opinions have equal weight to the best available scientific evidence.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Disinformation in media
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [237] Parmet WE Paul J COVID-19: the first posttruth pandemic Am J Public Health 110 2020 945 946
- Not checked yetcites [238] Tagliabue F Galassi L Mariani P The “pandemic” of disinformation in COVID-19 SN Compr Clin Med 2 2020 1287 1289 32838179 PMC7395797
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Another study estimates between 3·1 million and 3·4 million deaths from COVID-19 in India between the start of the pandemic and Sept 1, 2021, compared with 440 000 reported deaths; these figures suggest that the reported death count was roughly 14% of the actual value.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Regional policy choices in confronting the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [149] Jha P Deshmukh Y Tumbe C COVID mortality in India: national survey data and health facility deaths Science 375 2022 667 671 34990216 PMC9836201 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Third, the omicron wave has shown that serious economic disruptions can occur even in highly vaccinated populations,215 as it led to shortages of health and other essential workers, school closures, disruptions to business operations, and prevented the restoration of tourism and international travel.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Premature lifting of public health and social measures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [215] International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook Update, January 2022: rising caseloads, a disrupted recovery, and higher inflation https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2022/01/25/world-economic-outlook-update-january-2022 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Second, vaccination coverage provides only partial and waning protection against infection, although more protection against hospitalisation and death.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Premature lifting of public health and social measures
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [208] Universidad de Antioquia McMaster University COVID-END COVID-19 living evidence synthesis # 8 (version 8.7) https://www.mcmasterforum.org/docs/default-source/product-documents/living-evidence-syntheses/covid-19-living-evidence-synthesis-8.7---what-is-the-effectiveness-of-available-covid-19-vaccines-for-children-and-adolescents-including-variants-of-concern.pdf?sfvrsn=77c144ec_7 March 14, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 has been less lethal than the preceding delta variant, future variants are as likely to be more virulent or less virulent, and existing vaccines are likely to become less protective against serious illness and death.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Premature lifting of public health and social measures
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This anti-science movement has globalised with tragic consequences.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Disinformation in media
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [246] Hotez PJ Anti-science extremism in America: escalating and globalizing Microbes Infect 22 2020 505 507 32961275 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Inadequate efforts were made to prioritise the health and safety of these workers, first in requiring precautions in their workplaces, and later in reducing structural barriers to accessing vaccines when they became available.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [262] Wynants L Calster B Collins G Riley R Heinze G Schuit E Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal BMJ 369 2020 m1328 PMC7222643 32265220 source
- Not checked yetcites [263] Gates M Pillay J Wingert A Risk factors associated with severe outcomes of COVID-19: an updated rapid review to inform national guidance on vaccine prioritization in Canada medRxiv 2021 published online Nov 28. 10.1101/2021.04.23.21256014 (preprint). source
- Not checked yetcites [279] Njoku A Joseph M Felix R Changing the narrative: structural barriers and racial and ethnic inequities in COVID-19 vaccination Int J Environ Res Public Health 18 2021 9904 PMC8470519 34574827 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Cultural psychologists, for example, have distinguished between so-called tight and loose cultures, with tight cultures characterised by strong public adherence to social norms and loose cultures by lax adherence.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Public attitudes towards pandemic control and investments in behavioural sciences
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [256] Gelfand MJ Jackson JC Pan X The relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: a global analysis Lancet Planet Health 5 2021 e135 e144 33524310 PMC7946418 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the reliance of social media on so-called clickbait headlines and short commentaries has had a polarising effect on many communities.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Public attitudes towards pandemic control and investments in behavioural sciences
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First responders, service-sector workers, and other essential workers often receive low wages and, in some countries, low access to high-quality health care, and therefore disproportionately experience health, economic, and social effects.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Unequal health effects of the pandemic
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Societies also differ along a spectrum of individualism versus collectivism in terms of social norms, in which individualism champions the freedom of individual choice whereas collectivism champions conformity with the group.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Public attitudes towards pandemic control and investments in behavioural sciences
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The loss of learning could also potentially increase learning poverty levels to 63% and drive countries even further off-track from achieving their learning poverty goals.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [315] UNESCO Learning poverty https://gaml.uis.unesco.org/learning-poverty/ 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [316] The World Bank Urgent, effective action required to quell the impact of COVID-19 on education worldwide https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/immersive-story/2021/01/22/urgent-effective-action-required-to-quell-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-education-worldwide Jan 22, 2021 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“the education sector pivoted to online learning and digital resources, immediately redefining access to learning by access to the internet.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [310] The Lancet COVID-19 Commission India Task Force Reopening schools after COVID-19 closures https://covid19commission.org/regional-task-force-india April, 2021
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The absence of a structured, school-led routine and peer interactions has disrupted the lives of children; amplified the anxiety caused by isolation and their fears of the disease; and led to the loss of physical, intellectual, and social engagement.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Underlying chronic conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases might also worsen after COVID-19 infection, requiring closer monitoring.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The burdens of long COVID
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [336] Raveendran AV Jayadevan R Sashidharan S Long COVID: an overview Diabetes Metab Syndr 15 2021 869 875 33892403 PMC8056514
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As COVID-19 is likely to become endemic, many people could have long-term health care and social care needs, which could overburden the systems of countries and of school and work environments.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The burdens of long COVID
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [342] Aiyegbusi OL Hughes SE Turner G Symptoms, complications and management of long COVID: a review J R Soc Med 114 2021 428 442 34265229 PMC8450986
- Not checked yetcites [362] Byrne EA Understanding long COVID: nosology, social attitudes and stigma Brain Behav Immun 99 2022 17 24 34563621
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: COVID-19 is likely to become endemic.
In the paper
“Long COVID has substantial physical, mental, social, and economic effects, and long COVID might itself be an emerging pandemic.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The burdens of long COVID
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [361] Iyengar KP Jain VK Vaishya R Ish P Long COVID-19: an emerging pandemic in itself Adv Respir Med 89 2021 234 236 33966266
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Studies show that long COVID could be related to organ damage, persistence of the virus in the body, post-viral syndrome, persistence of chronic inflammation or immune response (autoantibody generation), post-critical-care syndrome, complications related to comorbidities, reactivation of the Epstein-Barr virus induced by COVID-19-related inflammation, and adverse effects of medications, among”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The burdens of long COVID
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [336] Raveendran AV Jayadevan R Sashidharan S Long COVID: an overview Diabetes Metab Syndr 15 2021 869 875 33892403 PMC8056514
- Not checked yetcites [358] Tay MZ Poh CM Rénia L MacAry PA Ng LFP The trinity of COVID-19: immunity, inflammation and intervention Nat Rev Immunol 20 2020 363 374 32346093 PMC7187672
- Not checked yetcites [359] Lan L Xu D Ye G Positive RT-PCR test results in patients recovered from COVID-19 JAMA 323 2020 1502 1503 32105304 PMC7047852
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In such situations it is almost impossible to maintain physical distance, practise safe hand hygiene, and stay healthy.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Stark socioeconomic effects
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The accurate reporting of long COVID is complicated.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The burdens of long COVID
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These people will require multidisciplinary and stigma-free care, which is not readily available in many settings.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The burdens of long COVID
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [342] Aiyegbusi OL Hughes SE Turner G Symptoms, complications and management of long COVID: a review J R Soc Med 114 2021 428 442 34265229 PMC8450986
- Not checked yetcites [362] Byrne EA Understanding long COVID: nosology, social attitudes and stigma Brain Behav Immun 99 2022 17 24 34563621
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“community health workers are instrumental in improving population health,367, 368, 369 and are crucial in linking people to preventive and clinical services, dispelling misinformation, and fostering trust.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The need for strong health systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [367] Perry HB Chowdhury M Were M Community health workers at the dawn of a new era: 11. CHWs leading the way to “Health for All” Health Res Policy Syst 19 suppl 3 2021 111 34641891 PMC8506098
- Not checked yetcites [368] Risko N Werner K Offorjebe OA Vecino-Ortiz AI Wallis LA Razzak J Cost-effectiveness and return on investment of protecting health workers in low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic PLoS One 15 2020 e0240503 PMC7546502 33035244
- Not checked yetcites [369] Ballard M Bancroft E Nesbit J Prioritising the role of community health workers in the COVID-19 response BMJ Glob Health 5 2020 e002550 PMC7298684 32503889
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Public health officials have little community presence, except in emergencies, and therefore little opportunity to build or rebuild trust.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The need for strong health systems
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Examples of effective building-level control measures include increasing outdoor air ventilation in buildings through mechanical heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems and opening windows, and upper-room ultraviolet germicidal irradiation in high-risk settings.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The need for strong health systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [402] Du RH Liang LR Yang CQ Predictors of mortality for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2: a prospective cohort study Eur Respir J 55 2020 2000524 PMC7144257 32269088
- Not checked yetcites [404] Wells W Wells M Wilder T The environmental control of epidemic contagion: I. An epidemiologic study of radiant disinfection of air in day schools Am J Hyg 35 1942 97 121
- Not checked yetcites [405] Li T Liu Y Di B Epidemiological investigation of an outbreak of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 in a boarding school: serological analysis of 1570 cases J Clin Virol 50 2011 235 239 21195022
- Not checked yetcites [406] Sangeetha K A simulation framework to characterize the effect of ventilation control on airborne infectious disease transmission in schools MSc thesis 2019 The University of Texas at Austin
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the rapid development of vaccines and scale-up of manufacturing capacities is an impressive example of private–public partnership and transnational scientific collaboration.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Rapid vaccine development yet unequal vaccine distribution and uptake
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, the air is delivered and returned within each row, which renders ventilation highly effective.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Safe public transport
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“High levels of income inequality breed a lack of social trust and solidarity,386, 387 which in turn erodes support for public services.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The need for strong health systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [386] Graafland J Lous B Income inequality, life satisfaction inequality and trust: a cross country panel analysis J Happiness Stud 20 2019 1717 1737
- Not checked yetcites [387] Paskov M Dewilde C Income inequality and solidarity in Europe Res Soc Stratif Mobil 30 2012 415 432
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although air travel can exacerbate the spread of infectious disease, and spread within aeroplanes has been reported, the risk of transmission of respiratory viruses among passengers in flight is low.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Safe public transport
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [413] Chen J He H Cheng W Potential transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on a flight from Singapore to Hangzhou, China: an epidemiological investigation Travel Med Infect Dis 36 2020 101816 PMC7336905 32645477
- Not checked yetcites [414] Pavli A Smeti P Hadjianastasiou S In-flight transmission of COVID-19 on flights to Greece: an epidemiological analysis Travel Med Infect Dis 38 2020 101882 PMC7494513 32949700
- Not checked yetcites [415] Speake H Phillips A Chong T Flight-associated transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 corroborated by whole-genome sequencing Emerg Infect Dis 26 2020 2872 2880 32990563 PMC7706937
- Not checked yetcites [416] Walker CM Ko G Effect of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation on viral aerosols Environ Sci Technol 41 2007 5460 5465 17822117
- Not checked yetcites [417] Khanh NC Thai PQ Quach H-L Transmission of SARS-CoV 2 during long-haul flight Emerg Infect Dis 26 2020 2617 2624 32946369 PMC7588538
- Not checked yetcites [418] Choi EM Chu DKW Cheng PKC In-flight transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Emerg Infect Dis 26 2020 2713 2716 32946370 PMC7588512
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Buses can substantially improve ventilation by opening as many windows, doors, or roof hatches as feasible;412 deploying recirculating-air cleaning systems that use mechanical filtration or ultraviolet germicidal irradiation; and requiring passengers to wear face masks.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Safe public transport
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [412] Edwards NJ Widrick R Wilmes J Reducing COVID-19 airborne transmission risks on public transportation buses: an empirical study on aerosol dispersion and control Aerosol Sci Technol 55 2021 1378 1397
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, the ventilation systems are not always operating when aeroplanes are parked at the gate, and this represents a time of higher risk.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Safe public transport
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [419] Airport Cooperative Research Program Infectious disease mitigation in airports and on aircraft 10.17226/22512 2013
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These chronic, non-communicable diseases can be mitigated through public health and social measures, through preventive and rehabilitative efforts to promote healthy behaviours such as nutritious diets and more active lifestyles, and by addressing the environmental determinants of non-communicable diseases, including air pollution and the built environment.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The need for strong health systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [392] Frumkin H Haines A Global environmental change and noncommunicable disease risks Annu Rev Public Health 40 2019 261 282 30633714
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This did not happen, and glaring vaccine inequities emerged as a result.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Research governance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The COVAX Facility—a mechanism through which to procure and equitably distribute COVID-19 vaccines—was a worthy innovation in principle, but upstream science policy failures and downstream implementation failures prevented the widespread availability of effective and safe COVID-19 vaccines in low-income countries.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The travails of COVAX
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This discrepancy leads to an inequitable outcome (the privatisation of publicly funded wealth generation) and to an inefficient outcome (the underuse of intellectual property because of monopoly pricing by patent holders).”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Rapid vaccine development yet unequal vaccine distribution and uptake
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alternative technologies, including recombinant protein COVID-19 vaccines, are not protected by patents and could have been made available early in the pandemic at very low cost or no cost to LMICs, alongside the patent-protected vaccines that use newer technologies.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Rapid vaccine development yet unequal vaccine distribution and uptake
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“US Operation Warp Speed, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, and other vaccine-funding initiatives operated on the premise that only multinational pharmaceutical companies had the ability to scale up and make effective vaccines, because of the mistaken belief that only new vaccine technologies could address the virus.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > The travails of COVAX
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although private capital markets funded some research, funding and scientific support from the US Government was indispensable.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Rapid vaccine development yet unequal vaccine distribution and uptake
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Large multinational pharmaceutical companies that develop vaccines are permitted monopolies on the production of these life-saving technologies during the terms of the patent and for the duration of applicable regulatory exclusivity, thereby leaving low-income countries with no effective access to vaccines other than through mechanisms such as the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations and”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Rapid vaccine development yet unequal vaccine distribution and uptake
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Suppression of the virus has the best outcomes for economics, health, and civil liberties.459”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Pandemic economics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [459] Oliu-Barton M Pradelski BSR Aghion P SARS-CoV-2 elimination, not mitigation, creates best outcomes for health, the economy, and civil liberties Lancet 397 2021 2234 2236 33932328 PMC8081398
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The COVID-19 pandemic is a setback for sustainable development globally, but building forward is a necessity.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 3: recommendations for ending the COVID-19 pandemic, preparing for the next, and long-term sustainable development > Sustainable development and a green recovery
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Calls for One Health approaches to address the risks of the emergence and transmission of zoonotic diseases are common among reports on pandemic prevention and preparedness,489, 490, 492, 494”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 3: recommendations for ending the COVID-19 pandemic, preparing for the next, and long-term sustainable development > Regulations for the prevention of pandemics from natural spillovers and research-related activities and for investigating their origins
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [489] WHO WHO's work in health emergencies—strengthening preparedness for health emergencies: implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005) https://www.icao.int/EURNAT/EUR%20and%20NAT%20Documents/COVID%2019%20Updates-%20CAPSCA%20EUR/05%20May%202021%20COVID19%20Updates/COVID19%20-%202021-05-07%20Updates/A74_9Add1-en.pdf May 5, 2021
- Not checked yetcites [490] Global Preparedness Monitoring Board A world in disorder https://www.gpmb.org/annual-reports/overview/item/2020-a-world-in-disorder Sept 14, 2020
- Not checked yetcites [492] McKee M Drawing light from the pandemic: a new strategy for health and sustainable development: a review of the evidence 2021 World Health Organization https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/publications/m/drawing-light-from-the-pandemic-a-new-strategy-for-health-and-sustainable-development
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In 2021, high-income countries bounced back to growth with far more vigour than did low-income countries, and long-term prospects suggest a divergent recovery, with advanced economies returning to their pre-pandemic output paths while emerging markets and low-income countries are likely to face a permanent negative output shock.458”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Pandemic economics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [458] International Monetary Fund Strengthening the credibility of public finances https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM/Issues/2021/10/13/fiscal-monitor-october-2021 October, 2021
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“lack of adequate sustainable development financing for LMICs”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Conclusion: protecting and promoting multilateralism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Bolstering SDG financing—especially for key physical and digital infrastructure, services, and social protection in low-income countries and LMICs—and the adoption and implementation of ambitious sustainable development policies can help to prevent future global shocks, including pandemics, cybersecurity events, or climate events, and to promote resilience.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 3: recommendations for ending the COVID-19 pandemic, preparing for the next, and long-term sustainable development > Sustainable development and a green recovery
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The next El Niño event, perhaps occurring as early as 2023, is likely to cause a large upward shift in worldwide temperatures, and the world could very soon exceed the 1·5°C threshold that was adopted as a guardrail by the Paris Climate Agreement.475”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Long-term economic and sustainable development recovery from the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [475] Hansen J Sato M Ruedy R Global temperature in 2021 http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2022/Temperature2021.13January2022.pdf January 13, 2022
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the lack of ambition in the global response to COVID-19 is like that of other pressing global challenges”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Conclusion: protecting and promoting multilateralism
plain- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“tensions among the major powers”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Conclusion: protecting and promoting multilateralism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“COVID-19 will lead to sustained and sizeable output losses in low-income and emerging economies, whereas advanced economies are expected to return closer to their pre-pandemic paths over the next 3 years.451”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Pandemic economics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [451] International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook October 2021: recovery during a pandemic—health concerns, supply disruptions, and price pressures https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2021/10/12/world-economic-outlook-october-2021 October, 2021
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Many such packages are likely to result in numerous adverse environmental impacts, particularly because of increases in fossil fuel combustion,478 which not only accelerates climate change but also results in higher levels of air pollution.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Long-term economic and sustainable development recovery from the pandemic
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [478] Bragge P Becker U Breu T How policymakers and other leaders can build a more sustainable post-COVID-19 ‘normal’ Discov Sustain 3 2022 7 35425927 PMC8853160
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“All reports that have been written on COVID-19 make strong recommendations for national health system strengthening for emergency preparedness and for the maintenance of primary and mental health care during emergencies.96, 490, 491, 492, 493, 494”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 3: recommendations for ending the COVID-19 pandemic, preparing for the next, and long-term sustainable development > Strengthen national health systems and increase investments in primary and public health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [96] The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness & Response COVID-19: make it the Last Pandemic https://theindependentpanel.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/COVID-19-Make-it-the-Last-Pandemic_final.pdf 2021 PMC9751704 33991477
- Not checked yetcites [490] Global Preparedness Monitoring Board A world in disorder https://www.gpmb.org/annual-reports/overview/item/2020-a-world-in-disorder Sept 14, 2020
- Not checked yetcites [491] Sagan A Webb E Azzopardi-Muscat N de la Mata I McKee M Figueras J Health systems resilience during COVID-19: lessons for building back better https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/publications/i/health-systems-resilience-during-covid-19-lessons-for-building-back-better Nov 11, 2021 37023237
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we have noted throughout this Commission report, the key to escaping both the pandemic and the economic fallout is widespread vaccination and basic public health precautions (a so-called vaccination-plus strategy), combined with the development and distribution of increasingly effective treatments for COVID-19 to lessen its health effects once contracted.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Pandemic economics
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Using a VSL equal to 70 times the GDP per capita, we see that the economic loss due to morality is therefore 70 × 0·39% of GDP, or 27% of annual GDP—a staggering sum, and far larger than the loss in market output.”
§ The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic > Section 2: a review of the global, regional, and national responses to COVID-19 > Pandemic economics
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The IHME mean estimates of COVID-19 infections and deaths are sufficiently accurate for the Commission's analysis.
“throughout the report, we rely on IHME estimates of infections and deaths; note that the IHME gives an estimated range, and we refer to the mean estimate”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Commission's composition and task force process are adequate to produce valid policy recommendations.
“The 28 Commissioners are global experts in public policy, international cooperation, epidemiology and vaccinology, economics and financial systems, sustainability sciences, and mental health.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The five-pillar framework captures the essential components of a successful fight against emerging infectious diseases.
“There are five basic pillars of a successful fight against emerging infectious diseases.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In the two-country open-border scenario, it is not practical to shut down travel between the countries or to impose effective quarantine on travellers between them.
“supposing that it is not practical to either shut down travel between the two countries or to impose an effective quarantine on travellers between the two countries.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Nearly all SARS-CoV-2 transmission occurs indoors.
“As nearly all transmission occurs indoors, the way in which we design and operate building ventilation and filtration systems can reduce transmission.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The International Monetary Fund provided urgent support of approximately $170 billion for around 90 countries.
“The International Monetary Fund (IMF) also provided urgent support of approximately $170 billion for around 90 countries.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Human behaviour is central to the transmission and suppression of the pandemic.
“Human behaviour is central to transmission of the disease and suppression of the pandemic.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Public attitudes are shaped by various factors including national culture, education, peer groups, social media, and leaders' actions and statements.
“Public attitudes are shaped by various factors, including national culture, education level, peer groups, social media, and the actions and statements of national leaders.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Social media had a crucial role in how public health and social measures were perceived.
“Social media also had a crucial role in how public health and social measures were perceived by the public.”
The paper relies on this without support.
COVID-19 is likely to become endemic.
“As COVID-19 is likely to become endemic”
The paper relies on this without support.
The US Government has not designed appropriate ways to manage intellectual property it co-funds and co-generates.
“Yet the US Government has not designed appropriate ways to manage the intellectual property that it co-funds and co-generates.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Intellectual property funded by the US Government typically ends up entirely in non-governmental hands at universities or companies.
“Typically, intellectual property that has been funded by the US Government ends up entirely in non-governmental hands, whether at universities or companies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Universities and companies charge vaccine prices much greater than actual manufacturing costs.
“Universities and companies then exercise monopoly rights to the technologies under patent, and charge prices for vaccine doses that are much greater than the actual costs of manufacturing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
COVAX failed to deliver on its targets and timelines because vaccine-producing companies made contracts directly with highest-paying governments rather than COVAX.
“However, in practice, COVAX failed to deliver on its targets and timelines because vaccine-producing companies made contracts directly with the governments that paid the highest prices, rather than with COVAX, which insisted on lower prices for low-income countries.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Vaccine-producing countries such as India imposed export bans on vaccines rather than delivering them to COVAX as promised.
“Moreover, vaccine-producing countries, such as India, imposed export bans on vaccines rather than delivering them to COVAX as promised.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The ability to grant emergency-use listing of COVID-19 vaccines was restricted to WHO or one of six stringent regulatory authorities, excluding LMIC national regulatory authorities.
“The ability to grant emergency-use listing of COVID-19 vaccines was restricted to either WHO or one of the six stringent regulatory authorities in the United States, Canada, UK, EU, Australia, and Japan—once again excluding any national regulatory authority based in an LMIC.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many individual drug treatment trials with available results recruited small numbers of patients, were underpowered, and could not detect useful beneficial effects.
“Many of the individual drug treatment trials for which results are available recruited small numbers of patients, such that the trials were underpowered and were not able to detect useful beneficial effects.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Central banks around the world reacted swiftly to unprecedented financial disturbances in March 2020.
“Central banks around the world reacted swiftly to unprecedented financial disturbances in March, 2020.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The World Bank approved a $14 billion fast-track facility for health emergency response on March 2, 2020, supporting more than 100 countries with credits and grants within 3 months.
“The World Bank approved a $14 billion fast-track facility for health emergency response on March 2, 2020, and this facility supported more than 100 countries with credits and grants within the subsequent 3-month period through the global health multiphase programmatic approach.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The World Bank approved $12 billion for financing vaccine procurement and delivery in early October 2020, though resources were limited by individual-country allocation requirements.
“The World Bank also approved $12 billion for financing vaccine procurement and delivery in early October, 2020, even though these resources were limited by their requirement to be allocated on an individual-country basis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The IMF's 2021 SDR allocation was made in proportion to existing IMF quotas, so most went to high-income countries and only $30 billion to Africa.
“However, this important infusion of liquidity was made in proportion to the existing IMF quotas, meaning that most of the special drawing rights allocation went to high-income countries, and only $30 billion to countries in Africa.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The IMF liquidity infusion was substantial relative to GDP of many low-income countries, up to 11% of recipient GDP in some cases.
“Nonetheless, this liquidity infusion was still substantial relative to the GDP of many low-income countries—up to 11% of recipient country GDP in some cases.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The G20 represents 63% of world's population and 87% of economic output.
“As a powerful complement to the UN, comprising 19 national governments and the EU, the G20 represents 63% of the world's population and 87% of its economic output.”
The paper relies on this without support.
G20 countries account for 90% of research expenditure, researchers, publications, and patents.
“G20 countries account for 90% of research expenditure, researchers, publications, and patents.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The pandemic did not alter the picture of health financing in any decisive way.
“The pandemic did not alter this picture in any decisive way.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Raising even a few billion dollars of international support for ACT Accelerator and COVAX proved extremely difficult.
“Raising even a few billion dollars of international support for ACT Accelerator and COVAX proved extremely difficult, despite the urgency of the pandemic.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The modest funding was insufficient to obtain crucial PPE, testing supplies, and especially vaccines.
“The modest funding was insufficient to obtain crucial PPE supplies, testing supplies, and especially vaccines.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Bilateral deals between countries and manufacturers were prioritised at the expense of COVAX.
“Bilateral deals between countries and manufacturers for the purchase of these commodities were prioritised at the expense of COVAX.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many producing countries implemented temporary export bans on essential products, with wider effects on access for countries in need.
“Many producing countries also implemented temporary export bans on essential products (eg, PPE, pharmaceuticals, and hand sanitiser), with wider effects on access for countries in need.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The spread of small vertical health funds has become unmanageable, with many key functions slipping through the cracks.
“The spread of small vertical health funds has become unmanageable, with many key functions slipping through the cracks.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The highly expansionary macroeconomic policies of 2020-21, particularly increases in money supply in US and eurozone, have resulted in high inflation in 2022.
“The highly expansionary macroeconomic policies of 2020–21, in particular the enormous increases in the money supply in both the United States and the eurozone, have resulted in high inflation in 2022, with the longer-term consequences still to be seen.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The war in Ukraine and sanctions against Russia have further exacerbated supply shocks due to COVID-19 and given rise to fear of extended stagflation.
“That the first 2 years of the pandemic were followed by the war in Ukraine and a stringent sanctions regime against the Russian Federation has further exacerbated the supply shocks due to COVID-19, and has given rise to the fear of an extended period of stagflation, in which the combination of monetary expansions and powerful supply shocks could lead to a combination of economic downturns and high”
The paper relies on this without support.
Earth is now 1.2°C hotter than pre-industrial temperature, and the 8 years since 2014 have been the eight warmest years since records began in 1870.
“Earth is now 1·2°C hotter than the pre-industrial temperature, and the 8 years since 2014 have been the eight warmest years since records began in 1870.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The COVID-19 pandemic threatens to divert global attention, financing, and political capital away from sustainable development.
“The COVID-19 pandemic threatens to divert global attention, financing, and scarce political capital away from the urgent agenda of sustainable development, including the SDGs and the Paris Climate Agreement.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Next Generation EU fund commits €750 billion towards recovery and resilience with focus on green and digital transformation.
“The Next Generation EU fund commits €750 billion towards recovery and resilience with a focus on a green and digital transformation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
EU member states must devote a minimum of 37% of funding to climate change and 20% to digital transition.
“In using the funds, EU member states must devote a minimum of 37% of the funding to climate change and a minimum of 20% to the digital transition.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The challenges of sustainable development in LMICs are far more acute.
“The challenges of sustainable development in LMICs are far more acute.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Even if COVID-19 pandemic recedes soon, economic scarring will be long-lasting.
“Even if the COVID-19 pandemic recedes soon, economic scarring will be long-lasting.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many lower-income countries lack financial means to promote long-term recovery and finance sustainable development and Paris commitments.
“Many lower-income countries lack the financial means to promote long-term recovery and to finance sustainable development and commitments under the Paris Climate Agreement.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is an opportunity to integrate health, environmental sustainability, and equitable economic recovery into post-COVID stimulus packages, but the potential has not been realised.
“There is an opportunity to integrate health, environmental sustainability, and equitable economic recovery into post-COVID stimulus packages, but the potential for doing so has not been realised.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Governments have focused efforts on measures bringing immediate benefits to employment and economic growth, such as green energy, transportation, and building energy efficiency.
“Moreover, governments have focused their efforts on measures that could bring immediate benefits to employment and economic growth, such as investments in green energy and transportation, and renovations to increase the energy efficiency of buildings.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Military conflicts and social turmoil can increase cases of COVID-19 and outbreaks of other infectious diseases and can affect surveillance systems, amplifying humanitarian crises.
“Military conflicts and social turmoil can increase cases of COVID-19 and outbreaks of other infectious diseases and can affect surveillance systems, therefore amplifying humanitarian crises.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In absence of unbiased, independent, rigorous search for natural origin and investigation of research-related hypotheses, public's trust in science will be imperilled, with potentially grave long-term repercussions.
“In the absence of an unbiased, independent, and rigorous search for a natural origin by a multidisciplinary team of experts alongside an unbiased, independent, and rigorous investigation of the research-related hypotheses, the public's trust in science will be imperilled, with potentially grave long-term repercussions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The weaknesses and shortfalls of IHR (2005) in protecting world against COVID-19 have led to decision by WHO member states to start process to draft new agreements.
“The weaknesses and shortfalls of the IHR (2005) in protecting the world against the COVID-19 pandemic have led to the decision by WHO member states to start the process to draft and negotiate new agreements on pandemic preparedness and response, including a possible new Pandemic Treaty.”
The paper relies on this without support.
One Health measures are likely to be highly cost effective and would complement investments in health systems, vaccines, therapeutics, and outbreak response.
“Such measures are likely to be highly cost effective and would complement investments in the strengthening of national health systems, the development of vaccines and therapeutics, and other outbreak response strategies described in this report.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is certain that future pandemics will arise from interactions between humans and animals, and that research on viruses will continue with potential for accidents.
“It is certain that future pandemics will arise from interactions between humans and animals, and that research on viruses will continue with the potential for accidents.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The collection of viruses and other pathogens from nature can give rise to research-related spillovers.
“We must be aware that the collection of viruses and other pathogens from nature can give rise to research-related spillovers.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Such activities have been largely unregulated in the past.
“Such activities have been largely unregulated in the past.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Even today, there is little understanding and clarity about research on SARS-like viruses that was underway just before COVID-19 pandemic.
“Even today, there is little understanding and clarity about the research on SARS-like viruses that was underway just before the COVID-19 pandemic.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most countries lack meaningful pandemic preparedness plans.
“Most countries lack meaningful pandemic preparedness plans.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The countries that made such plans, such as Western Pacific region after SARS, have fared best in COVID-19 pandemic.
“The countries that made such plans, such as countries of the Western Pacific region after the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome, have fared best in the COVID-19 pandemic.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Global public goods ought to be available to all.
“to ensure that global public goods are available to all”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, investments in the “emergency care functions” module–including in critical components like oxygen–could save lives during a pandemic surge.135”
From Global health 2050: the path to halving premature death by mid-century (2024) · cites this paper as [135]
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
The anti-vaccination infodemic on social media: A behavioral analysis
Germani, F., & Biller-Andorno, N. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247642 · Cited by 316
RetractedClinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China
Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, G., Xu, J., Gu, X., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30183-5 · Cited by 48,884
A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019
Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Li, X., Yang, B., Song, J., Zhao, X., Huang, B., Shi, W., Lu, R., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001017 · Cited by 28,244
Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia
Li, Q., Guan, X., Wu, P., Wang, X., Zhou, L., Tong, Y., Ren, R., Leung, K. S. M., Lau, E. H. Y., Wong, J. Y., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001316 · Cited by 16,575
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 · Cited by 13,697
Self-citationDexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19
The RECOVERY Collaborative Group (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2021436 · Cited by 11,477
First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States
Holshue, M. L., DeBolt, C., Lindquist, S., Lofy, K. H., Wiesman, J., Bruce, H., Spitters, C., Ericson, K., Wilkerson, S., Tural, A., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001191 · Cited by 6,030
Frenk, J., Chen, L., Bhutta, Z. A., Cohen, J., Crisp, N., Evans, T., Fineberg, H., Garcia, P., Ke, Y., Kelley, P., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61854-5 · Cited by 5,960
Santomauro, D. F., Mantilla Herrera, A. M., Shadid, J., Zheng, P., Ashbaugh, C., Pigott, D. M., Abbafati, C., Adolph, C., Amlag, J. O., Aravkin, A. Y., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02143-7 · Cited by 5,444
Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19
Carfì, A., Bernabei, R., Landi, F., & for the Gemelli Against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care Study Group (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.12603 · Cited by 4,561
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Margolin, 2020, Intelligence report warned of coronavirus crisis as early as November: sources, ABC News
- Lerner, 2022, NIH sent The Intercept 292 fully redacted pages related to virus research in Wuhan, The Intercept
- Allam, 2020, The first 50 days of COVID-19: a detailed chronological timeline and extensive review of literature documenting the pandemic, 1
- Grady, 2020, Three U.S. airports to check passengers for a deadly Chinese coronavirus, The New York Times
- 2020, Coronavirus: ‘An emergency in China, but not yet a global health emergency’, UN News
- Rogers, 2020, Trump administration signals formal withdrawal from W.H.O, The New York Times
- Burns, 2021, International travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 25
- Wells, 1942, The environmental control of epidemic contagion: I. An epidemiologic study of radiant disinfection of air in day schools, Am J Hyg, 35, 97
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 861
Desclaux, A., Bila, B., Egrot, M., & Sow, K. (2023) · Médecine tropicale et santé internationale · doi:10.48327/mtsi.v3i4.2023.440
Sirait, R. A., Afrizal, A., Putra, A. E., Bachtiar, A., Machmud, R., Hardisman, H., Eyanoer, P. C., & Jendrius, J. (2023) · The Open Public Health Journal · doi:10.2174/0118749445276526231211043001
Early Detection, Response, and Surveillance of the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis
Rabellino, E. M., Smith, A. H., & Cohen, M. C. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009396998.004
Caple, A., Dimaano, A., Sagolili, M. M., Uy, A. A., Aguirre, P., Alano, D., Baul, K. A., Camaya, G. S., Carlos, A. R., Ciriaco, B. J., et al. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.01.20.24301539
Coping with Life Stress, volume II
(2024) · Frontiers research topics · doi:10.3389/978-2-8325-4462-4
To admit mistakes is not a weakness: it is the first step on the road of progress
Vlassov, V. (2024) · European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckad208
Loxley, W. A., & Nanwani, S. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781032690278-2
Social Structure Adaptation to COVID-19
Nanwani, S., & Loxley, W. A. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781032690278
Makin, D. A., Howell, E., Wilson, T., & Parks, M. (2024) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104387
Epidemiología de la pandemia por COVID-19
Contreras, V., Sánchez Lerma, L., Gastelbondo-Pastrana, B., Rivero Herrera, R., & Máttar, S. (2023) · doi:10.21892/9786287515376.4
Özçelik, C. E., Araz, C. Z., Yılmaz, Ö., Gülyüz, S., Özdamar, P., Salmanlı, E., Özkul, A., & Şeker, U. Ö. Ş. (2024) · ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science · doi:10.1021/acsptsci.3c00317
Macías, A. E., Gutiérrez, E. S., Fajardo-Dolci, G., & Carrillo-Esper, R. (2024) · Gaceta Médica de México · doi:10.24875/gmm.24000046
Zhang, Y., Zang, S., Zhang, X., Qu, Z., Zhou, X., Lin, L., & Hou, Z. (2024) · China CDC Weekly · doi:10.46234/ccdcw2024.062
Varela, V., Giogkaraki, E., Vlastos, D., Alzueta, E., Perrin, P. B., Ramos‐Usuga, D., Arango‐Lasprilla, J. C., & Liozidou, A. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4265194/v1
Obstacles in Basic Health Service When Dealing with COVID-19: A Reflection for Improvement
Eyanoer, P. C., & Zaluchu, F. (2024) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s446298
Brockmann, E., & Söchtig, P. (2024) · Medical humanities · doi:10.14361/9783839471975-032
COVID-19 Vaccine development and distribution
Excler, J., Privor-Dumm, L. A., & Kim, J. H. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-99967-0.00233-7
Toward a Healthier Future: Lessons From the COVID-19 Pandemic
Goldman, M., & Sansonetti, P. J. (2024) · Frontiers for Young Minds · doi:10.3389/frym.2024.1271484
Monlezun, D. J. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21597-1.00006-8
Design part I: Artificial intelligence + financing
Monlezun, D. J. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21597-1.00002-0
Prasad, S., Sharma, S., Hussain, N., Bashir, A. M., Prasad, P. S., & Maqbool, A. (2024) · Journal of Medical - Clinical Research & Reviews · doi:10.33425/2639-944x.1375
Working and Absence from Work during the Pandemic
(2024) · Frontiers research topics · doi:10.3389/978-2-8325-5078-6
Wicked problems of early-COVID-19 response: A content analysis of public emergent norms
Wier, L., Li, X., McAleavy, T., Choi, B., & Urbane, L. M. (2024) · Urban Resilience and Sustainability · doi:10.3934/urs.2024009
Kuchenbecker, A. S., Torrent, H. S., & Ziegelmann, F. A. (2024) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/s00181-024-02635-7
Yamamura, Y., Matsumoto, N., Takao, S., & Yorifuji, T. (2024) · JMA Journal · doi:10.31662/jmaj.2024-0009
GIFTS: Project-Based Service-Learning for First-Year Engineering Students
Assanah, F., Wagstrom, K. M., Burkey, D. D., & Creed, M. (2024) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--47503
Preparedness for an upcoming pandemic. Recommendations by the National Academy of Medicine of Mexico
Macías, A. E., Gutiérrez, E. S., Fajardo-Dolci, G., & Carrillo-Esper, R. (2024) · Gaceta Médica de México · doi:10.24875/gmm.m24000871
Das, S. B., Milo, M. S., & Rosario, A. (2024) · ADB briefs · doi:10.22617/brf240369-2
Review of: "Global Governance and Sustainable Development: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic"
Eliakimu, E. S. (2024) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/7hd3p1
Initial clinical evaluation of chest digital tomosynthesis in adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia
Li, Z., Wu, X., Zhang, G., Wu, D., Zhang, Y., Wang, C., Zou, L., Gu, X., & Ren, T. (2024) · Chinese Medical Journal · doi:10.1097/cm9.0000000000003297
Self-citationMpox 1b: Upstanders for Science in Western and Chinese Social Media
Álvarez-Guerrero, G., Guo, M., Bordanoba-Gallego, L., Torras-Gómez, E., de Aguileta, G. L., Joanpere, M., Pulido, C., de Aguileta, A. L., Racionero-Plaza, S., Puigvert, L., et al. (2024) · Masculinities & Social Change · doi:10.17583/mcs.15612
A Simple Method to Select Harmful from Harmless Solid Medical Waste Contaminated with PathogensPreprint
Fraeyman, N., Malfait, S., Duprez, V., & Mortier, E. P. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4944684
Impfstrategie im Kontext der Nachhaltigkeitsziele als globale Notwendigkeit und Chance
Hungerland, E., & Metken, J. (2024) · Springer Reference Pflege, Therapie, Gesundheit · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-68278-4_41
Choong, M.-S., Hsieh, Y.-C. A., & Wong, C. (2024) · East Asian Science Technology and Society An International Journal · doi:10.1080/18752160.2024.2404325
Outbreak of Deadly Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: Diagnosis and Management
Tiwari, A., Singh, D., Kumar, D., Chandra, V., Vishvakarma, N. K., Shukla, D., Jha, H., & Singh, R. P. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-4723-8_15
Akın, A., SAFİ, Y., Bektas, N. E., & DEMİR, H. A. (2024) · Coronaviruses · doi:10.2174/0126667975319329241010070145
Ferreira, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1436979
Asadullah, M. N., Mitchell, A. E., Greco, G., Mitra, S., Biggeri, M., Venkatapuram, S., Aristizábal, A. B., & Chiappero‐Martinetti, E. (2024) · Journal of Human Development and Capabilities · doi:10.1080/19452829.2024.2416890
Silver, I. A., Burtch, E., Janda, K., Lattimore, P. K., & DeMichele, M. T. (2024) · American Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1007/s12103-024-09778-4
Racine-Poon, A., Præstgaard, J., & Sverdlov, O. (2024) · Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1080/19466315.2024.2429415
Improving Global Governance of Pandemic Response
Watal, J. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009282406.014
Alternative Means of Fighting Pandemics
Hl, S., & Sunder, M. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009282406.012
Recovery is missing in the pandemic treaty
Rossman, J. S., & van der Togt, V. (2024) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.q2827
Bibliometric Analysis of COVID-19-related Publications in Nursing by Philippine-based Authors
Abad, P. J. B., Posadas, J. J. B., Soberano, J. I. D., Torres, R. Q. D., Baccay, K.-L. B., Mabale, M. A. A., Caasi, M. P., & Peralta, A. B. (2024) · Acta Medica Philippina · doi:10.47895/amp.vi0.10432
The Economic Power of Capital and the Spread of COVID-19 in the United States: An Empirical Study
Zhao, J. (2024) · Review of Radical Political Economics · doi:10.1177/04866134241300804
Canada’s Pandemic Preparedness and Response: Health Equity or Health Security?
Hindmarch, S. (2024) · Canada and international affairs · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-67015-2_13
Prosocial Intentions and Subsequent Cognitive Health: A Prospective Cohort Study
Farmer, J. G., Macchia, L., Bu, F., Gong, J., Steptoe, A., Demakakos, P., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2025) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbaf004 · Cited by 1
Greslehner, G. P. (2025) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003342816-17
ASSESSMENT OF THE FUNDING LEVEL OF THE MEDICAL UNITS WITHIN THE PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM
Pricope-Păduraru, O., Padurari, C., Stafie, L., Duceac, L.-D., & Matei, M. C. (2024) · Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation · doi:10.62610/rjor.2024.1.16.5
Bhundoo, A. K., Wilke, J., & Pillay, J. D. (2024) · African Journal for Physical Activity and Health Sciences (AJPHES) · doi:10.37597/ajphes.2024.30.4-4
Warneken, F., & McAuliffe, K. (2025) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09637214241306057
Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases in Emergency Settings
(2025) · Frontiers research topics · doi:10.3389/978-2-8325-6070-9
Integrated Care in Latin America
Ehrenberg, N., Artaza, O., Gómez‐Duarte, I., Leyns, C., Perman, G., Sáenz, R., Pérez-Hernández, G., & Sancho, W. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25376-8_86-1
Jin, J., Lai, D. W. L., Yan, E., & Lee, V. W. P. (2025) · Journal of Primary Care & Community Health · doi:10.1177/21501319251334207
PREVALÊNCIA PÓS-PANDEMIA DA COVID-19 NO BRASIL: UMA ANÁLISE CRÍTICA DO CENÁRIO EPIDEMIOLÓGICO
Cruz, M. M. R., dos Santos, L. C., de Queiroz, L. E. S., Barata, E. R. D. N., & de Souza, J. T. L. (2025) · Anais do I Congresso Brasileiro de Estudos Epidemiológicos On-line · doi:10.51161/iv-epidemion/53746
Internationale Gesundheitspolitik – Global Health Governance
Hein, W. (2025) · SDG - Forschung, Konzepte, Lösungsansätze zur Nachhaltigkeit · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-47224-5_6
Jang, H.-Y., Jeong, S.-Y., Lee, E., & Kim, S. (2025) · Journal of Herbal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.hermed.2025.101017
Integrated Care in Latin America
Ehrenberg, N., Artaza, O., Gómez‐Duarte, I., Leyns, C., Perman, G., Sáenz, R., Pérez-Hernández, G., & Sancho, W. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25376-8_86-2
Implications of Tobacco Use on Pathogen‐Driven Diseases: A Public Health and Policy Perspective
Kabbani, N., & Olds, J. L. (2025) · World Medical & Health Policy · doi:10.1002/wmh3.70013
Hoornweg, D. T. (2025) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-025-01548-2
Wildner, M. (2025) · Das Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1055/a-2566-6136
Li, M., Grépin, K. A., Zhang, R., Cowling, B. J., & Yang, B. (2025) · Epidemics · doi:10.1016/j.epidem.2025.100837
Mathieu, C., Bezin, J., & Pariente, A. (2025) · American Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1093/ajh/hpaf085
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.002.0004
The Impact of Identity, Satisfaction, and Empathy on Bonding
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.003.0011
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.003.0003
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.003.0009
European Macroeconomic Policies During COVID-19
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.003.0008
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.002.0005
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.003.0007
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.003.0010
The EU’s Bind When It Came to Borders and Lockdowns
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.003.0005
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.002.0008
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.002.0007
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.003.0006
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.002.0006
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.003.0012
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.003.0001
Why the EU Did Not Fail Forward During COVID-19
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.003.0002
The Politicization of Policymaking During the COVID-19 Crisis
Truchlewski, Z., Oana, I., Moise, A. D., & Kriesi, H. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198951544.003.0004
Schwartz, A., Mikati, S., Knipper, F., Vogel, A. R., & Stiegel, M. A. (2025) · Applied Biosafety · doi:10.1089/apb.2025.0006
Liu, H., Liang, Q., Lai, C., & Liang, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1472331
Diálogos fotográficos do enfrentamento à pandemia por conselheiro(a)s de saúde
Rocha, H. G., Sacramento, A. S. E., Buccini, G., Rosa, A. D. S., & Sala, D. C. P. (2025) · Interface - Comunicação Saúde Educação · doi:10.1590/interface.240433
Fu, C., Zheng, Z., Yin, X., Ge, X., Zeng, X., Zha, L., & Li, Y. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6776346/v1
Improving Wellbeing and Reaching Success in Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine
Honorato-Cía, C., Rubulotta, F. M., & Nešković, V. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-86286-1_13
Air Handling Unit with Electrostatic Precipitator via Antimicrobial Aerosol Coating Method
Park, D. H., Kim, J. R., Hwang, J., Kim, Y., Lee, G., Park, I., Kim, S.-B., & Han, B. (2024) · IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting (IAS) · doi:10.1109/ias55788.2024.11023742
Magli, A. C., Bauch, C. T., d’Onofrio, A., & Manfredi, P. (2025) · Frontiers in Epidemiology · doi:10.3389/fepid.2025.1593883
Campbell, L., & Lamberts, R. (2025) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/147120250611100041
Sreedhara, M., Lee, K. M., King, Y. A., Brenner, J., Whitehill, J., Markovitz, A. R., Jackson, K., Davis, A., Vaid, I., Steiner, A., et al. (2025) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/15248399251345399
Alobaydullah, A., LaJoie, A. S., Thomas, S. D., Fumey, R., & Alsaleem, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1588931
Zaręba, S. (2024) · PRAWO i WIĘŹ · doi:10.36128/priw.vi48.550
Setterfield, M. (2026) · International Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1080/08911916.2026.2703629
From Chaos to Coordination: Reviewing the Role of Meta-Leadership in 21st Century Crisis ManagementPreprint
Morshed, Z., Wais, M., Ahmed, H., & Obi, C. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5377315
Factors influencing post-COVID-19 protective behaviors: a retrospective study in Indonesia
Hidayana, I., & Amir, S. (2025) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdaf096
Advancing infection profiling under data uncertainty through contagion potential
Roy, S., Biswas, P., & Ghosh, P. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0329828
Mammas, I., Agrafiotis, M., Kazani, A., Koutsaftiki, C., Papatheodoropoulou, A., Drysdale, S. B., Theodoridou, M., & Spandidos, D. A. (2025) · Medicine International · doi:10.3892/mi.2025.259
Metadata
- Authors
- Sachs, J. D., Karim, S. S. A., Aknin, L., Allen, J., Brosbøl, K., Colombo, F., Barron, G. C., Espinosa, M. F., Gaspar, V., Gaviria, A., Haines, A., Hotez, P. J., Koundouri, P., Bascuñán, F. L., Lee, J.-K., Pate, M. A., Ramos, G., Reddy, K. S., Serageldin, I., Thwaites, J., Vike-Freiberga, V., Wang, C., Were, M. K., Xue, L., Bahadur, C., Bottazzi, M. E., Bullen, C., Laryea-Adjei, G., Ben Amor, Y., Karadag, O., Lafortune, G., Torres, E., Barredo, L., Bartels, J. G. E., Joshi, N., Hellard, M., Huynh, U. K., Khandelwal, S., Lazarus, J. V., & Michie, S.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Harvard University (US)
- Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques (FR)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (IT)
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
- UNESCO (FR)
- Public Health Foundation of India (IN)
- Bibliotheca Alexandrina (EG)
- Monash University (AU)
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- United Nations Children's Fund (US)
- United Nations (US)
- Burnet Institute (AU)
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES)
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sachs, Jeffrey D
- ORCID
- Sachs, Jeffrey D
- Karim, Salim S Abdool
- Aknin, Lara
- Allen, Joseph
- Espinosa, María Fernanda
- Haines, Andy
- Hotez, Peter J
- Koundouri, Phoebe
- Lee, Jong-Koo
- Pate, Muhammad Ali
- Reddy, K Srinath
- Serageldin, Ismail
- Wang, Chen
- Were, Miriam Khamadi
- Xue, Lan
- Bullen, Chris
- Lafortune, Guillaume
- Barredo, Lauren
- Joshi, Neena
- Hellard, Margaret
- Khandelwal, Shweta
- Lazarus, Jeffrey V
- Michie, Susan
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-10
- Volume
- 400
- Issue
- 10359
- Pages
- 1224-1280
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- PMC
- PMC9539542
- OpenAlex
- W4295747815
- Semantic Scholar
- ac5488c86b6f6040770a5c679a83b50e5aad7d41
- Cited by
- 842
- References
- 308
- Citations by year
- 2026: 108 · 2025: 173 · 2024: 255 · 2023: 254 · 2022: 51
- FWCI
- 19.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Public Health Policies and Education
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, international cooperation, multilateralism, global health governance, pandemic preparedness, health equity, low- and middle-income countries, vaccine equity, health data transparency, disinformation, biosafety regulation, global health financing, global health security, health system resilience
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-04, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-04 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review