Cited by 609Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Parent Reports of Sensory Symptoms in Toddlers with Autism and Those with Other Developmental Disorders

Rogers, Sally J., Hepburn, Susan, Wehner, Elizabeth·2003·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

The Short Sensory Profile was used to assess parental report of sensory reactivity across four groups of young children (n = 102). Groups were autism (n = 26), fragile X syndrome (n = 20), developmental disabilities of mixed etiology (n = 32), and typically developing children (n = 24). Groups were comparable on overall mental age (x = 22 months), and clinical groups were comparable on chronological age (x = 31 months). Significant differences were detected at alpha <.01 for tactile sensitivity [F(3,99) = 10.01], taste/smell sensitivity [F(3,99) = 11.63], underreactive/seeks stimulation [F(3,99) = 4.56], auditory filtering [F(3,99) = 19.67], and low energy/weak muscles [F(3,99) = 14.21]. Both children with fragile X syndrome and children with autism had significantly more sensory symptoms overall than the two comparison groups, and children with autism did not differ significantly from children with fragile X syndrome. Both groups were more impaired than developmentally delayed and typically developing children in tactile sensitivity and auditory filtering. Children with autism were more abnormal in responses to taste and smell than all other groups. Children with fragile X syndrome were more abnormal than all other groups in low energy/weak muscles. Sensory reactivity of children with developmental delays was comparable to mental age-matched typically developing toddlers. Correlational analyses indicated that neither overall developmental level nor IQ was related to abnormal sensory reactivity in children with autism or general developmental disorders. However, abnormal sensory reactivity had a significant relationship with overall adaptive behavior.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:jadd.0000006000.38991.a7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Bishop, D. V. M. (1997). Cognitive neuropsychology and developmental disorders: Uncomfortable bedfellows. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 899-923. · DOI
  2. Cox, A., Klein, K., Charman, T., Baird, G., Baron-Cohen, S., Swettenham, J., Drew, A., Wheelwright, S., & Nightingale, N. (1999). The early diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: Use of the autism diagnostic interview-revised at 20 months and 42 months of age. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 719-732. · DOI
  3. Dunn, W., Myles, B. S., & Orr, S. (2002). Sensory processing issues associated with Asperger syndrome: Apreliminary investigation. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 97-102. · DOI
  4. Dunn, W. (1999). Development and validation of the short sensory profile. In W. Dunn (Ed.), The sensory profile examiner's manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  5. Goldstein, H. (2000). Commentary: Interventions to facilitate auditory, visual, and motor integration: “Show me the data”. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 423-425. · DOI
  6. Grandin, T., & Scariano, M. M. (1986). Emergence, labeled autistic (1st ed.). Novato, CA: Arena Press.
  7. Kientz, M. A., & Dunn, W. (1997). A comparison of the performance of children with and without autism on the sensory profile. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 530-537. · DOI
  8. Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P., & Risi, S. (1999). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-WPS Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
  9. Lord, C., Storoschuk, S., Rutter, M., & Pickles, A. (1993). Using the ADI-R to diagnose autism in preschool children. Infant Mental Health Journal, 14, 234-252. · DOI · Paper page
  10. McIntosh, D. N., Miller, L. J., & Shyu, V. (1999). Development and validation of the short sensory profile. In W. Dunn (Ed.), The sensory profile examiner's manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  11. Miller, L. J., McIntosh, D. N., McGrath, J., Shyu, V., Lampe, M., Taylor, A. K., Tassone, F., Neitzel, K., Stackhouse, T., & Hagerman, R. J. (1999). Electrodermal responses to sensory stimuli in individuals with fragile X syndrome: A preliminary report. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 83, 268-279. · DOI
  12. Miller, L. J., Reisman, J., McIntosh, D. N., & Simon, J. (2001). An ecological model of sensory modulation: performance of children with fragile X syndrome, autism, attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity and sensory modulation dysfunction. In S. Smith-Roley, E. Imperatore-Blanche, & R. C. Schaaf (Eds.), Understanding the nature of sensory integration with diverse populations. San Antonio, TX: Therapy Skill Builders.
  13. Mullen, E. M. (1995). Mullens scales of early learning. (AGS ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  14. Ornitz, E. M., Guthrie, D., & Farley, A. H. (1977). The early development of autistic children. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 7, 207-229. · DOI
  15. Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D. A., & Cicchetti, D. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  16. Thelen, E. (1966). Normal infant stereotypes: A dynamic systems approach. In R. L. Sprague & K. M. Newell (Eds.), Sterotyped movements: Brain and behavior relationships.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  17. Wing, L. (1969). The handicaps of autistic children: a comparison study. Journal of Child Psychology and Child Psychiatry, 10, 1-40. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rogers, S. J., Hepburn, S., & Wehner, E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of Colorado Health (US)
Corresponding author
Rogers, Sally J.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2003-12
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
631-642
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2020352503
Cited by
609
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 45
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Fragile X Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R21 DC05574, R21DC005574)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD035468, P01 HD35468)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
sensory reactivity, autism spectrum disorder, fragile X syndrome, developmental disabilities, toddlers, tactile sensitivity, auditory filtering, adaptive behavior, Short Sensory Profile, parent report
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Analysis of Variance, Autistic Disorder, Child, Preschool, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Infant, Intelligence, Male, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensation Disorders, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review