CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 180Personality Traits and PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 249 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trait entitlement: A cognitive-personality source of vulnerability to psychological distress.

Grubbs, Joshua B., Exline, Julie J.·2016·Psychological Bulletin
DOI 10.1037/bul0000063
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Psychological entitlement is a personality trait characterized by pervasive feelings of deservingness, specialness, and exaggerated expectations. The present review expands upon this understanding by conceptualizing entitlement as a cognitive-personality vulnerability to psychological distress. A review of research is conducted, and a novel, multipart model is described by which entitlement may be seen as such a vulnerability. First, exaggerated expectations, notions of the self as special, and inflated deservingness associated with trait entitlement present the individual with a continual vulnerability to unmet expectations. Second, entitled individuals are likely to interpret these unmet expectations in ways that foster disappointment, ego threat, and a sense of perceived injustice, all of which may lead to psychological distress indicators such as dissatisfaction across multiple life domains, anger, and generally volatile emotional responses. Furthermore, in the wake of disappointment, ego threat, or perceived injustice, entitled individuals are likely to attempt to bolster their entitled self-concept, leading to a reinforcement of entitled beliefs, thereby initiating the cycle again. At each stage of this process, entitlement presents the individual with the possibility of experiencing distress, predisposes further risk factors for distress (e.g., the subsequent steps in the model), and increases the risk of interpersonal conflict, again leading to distress. A review of relevant empirical data suggests preliminary support for this conceptual model of entitlement. (PsycINFO Database Record

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/bul0000063

Cites

246 of 246 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 180

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Grubbs, J. B., & Exline, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Bowling Green State University (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2016-11
Volume
142
Issue
11
Pages
1204-1226
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
DOI
10.1037/bul0000063
OpenAlex
W2512067553
Cited by
180
References
249
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 2
FWCI
16.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation (36094)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
psychological entitlement, psychological distress, self-concept, ego threat, perceived injustice, disappointment, anger, emotional volatility, interpersonal conflict, self-concept maintenance
MeSH terms
Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Personality, Self Concept, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review