Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 463

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prediction of human errors by maladaptive changes in event-related brain networks

Open access
Eichele, Tom, Debener, Stefan, Calhoun, Vince D., Specht, Karsten, Engel, Andreas K., Hugdahl, Kenneth, von Cramon, D. Yves, Ullsperger, Markus·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0708965105
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Humans engaged in monotonous tasks are susceptible to occasional errors that may lead to serious consequences, but little is known about brain activity patterns preceding errors. Using functional MRI and applying independent component analysis followed by deconvolution of hemodynamic responses, we studied error preceding brain activity on a trial-by-trial basis. We found a set of brain regions in which the temporal evolution of activation predicted performance errors. These maladaptive brain activity changes started to evolve ≈30 sec before the error. In particular, a coincident decrease of deactivation in default mode regions of the brain, together with a decline of activation in regions associated with maintaining task effort, raised the probability of future errors. Our findings provide insights into the brain network dynamics preceding human performance errors and suggest that monitoring of the identified precursor states may help in avoiding human errors in critical real-world situations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0708965105

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.08.023 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.1100301 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70155-2 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00566-4 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.12.001 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.021 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nn1238 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1477 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/35094500 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/hbm.20428 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1002/hbm.20537 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.051 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1073/pnas.0504136102 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.06.012 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1126/science.1134405 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.041 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.013 · DOI · Paper page
  19. G Gratton, et al., Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. J Exp Psychol 14, 331–344 (1988).
  20. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0935 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.026 · DOI
  22. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3286-05.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01813-1 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1109/MEMB.2006.1607672 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1006/nimg.1998.0369 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.029 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02749-9 · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.0704320104 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1037/0735-7044.119.6.1687 · DOI
  30. 10.1126/science.273.5283.1868 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.010 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1093/cercor/13.4.422 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Eichele, T., Debener, S., Calhoun, V. D., Specht, K., Engel, A. K., Hugdahl, K., von Cramon, D. Y., & Ullsperger, M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-04-22
Volume
105
Issue
16
Pages
6173-6178
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.0708965105
OpenAlex
W1991491984
Cited by
463
References
20
FWCI
18.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.