Cited by 155Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringRetinal Development and DisordersTactile and Sensory Interactions

Spatial resolution and perception of patterns mediated by a subretinal 16-electrode array in patients blinded by hereditary retinal dystrophies

Wilke, Robert, Gabel, Veit-Peter, Sachs, Helmut, Bartz Schmidt, Karl-Ulrich, Gekeler, Florian, Besch, Dorothea, Szurman, Peter, Stett, Alfred +10 more·2011·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

PURPOSE: The perception of 11 persons blinded by hereditary retinal degeneration elicited by a subretinally implanted 16-electrode array used for light-independent direct stimulation of the retina is described. This device is part of the Tübingen retina implant, which also employs a light-sensitive, multiphotodiode array (MPDA). The ability to reliably recognize complex spatial percepts was investigated. METHODS: Eleven blind volunteers received implants and participated in standardized psychophysical tests investigating the size and shape of perceptions elicited by single-electrode activation, multiple-electrode activation, and activation of compound patterns such as simplified letters. RESULTS: Visual percepts were elicited reliably in 8 of 11 patients. On single-electrode activation, percepts were generally described as round spots of light of distinguishable localization in the visual field. On activation of a pattern of electrodes, percepts matched that pattern when electrodes were activated sequentially. Patterns such as horizontal or vertical bars were identified reliably; the most recent participant was able to recognize simplified letters presented on the 16-electrode array. The smallest distance between sites of concurrent retinal stimulation still yielding discernible spots of light was assessed to be 280 μm, corresponding to a logMAR of 1.78. CONCLUSIONS: Subretinal electric stimulation can yield reliable, predictable percepts. Patterned perception is feasible, enabling blind persons to recognize shapes and discriminate different letters. Stimulation paradigms must be optimized, to further increase spatial resolution, demanding a better understanding of physical and biological effects of single versus repetitive stimulation (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00515814).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.10-6946

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients might still experience arcuate and linear phosphenes when high current amplitudes are used, most probably due to direct RGC activation.

    “However, patients might still experience arcuate and linear phosphenes when high current amplitudes are used [140], most probably due to direct RGC activation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilke, R., Gabel, V.-P., Sachs, H., Bartz Schmidt, K.-U., Gekeler, F., Besch, D., Szurman, P., Stett, A., Wilhelm, B., Peters, T., Harscher, A., Greppmaier, U., Kibbel, S., Benav, H., Bruckmann, A., Stingl, K., Kusnyerik, A., & Zrenner, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt (DE)
  • From the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany;
  • Natural and Medical Sciences Institute (DE)
  • the Steinbeis Transfer Centre Eyetrial, Centre for Ophthalmology, Tübingen, Germany;
  • Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany; and
  • From the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; the 8Department of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2011-07-30
Volume
52
Issue
8
Pages
5995
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W2051509380
Cited by
155
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
retinal prosthesis, inherited retinal degeneration, visual perception, spatial resolution, pattern recognition, letter recognition, electrode spacing, blind patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Blindness, Electrodes, Implanted, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motion Perception, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Prosthesis Design, Psychophysics, Space Perception, Prosthesis Implantation, Visual Prosthesis, Retinal Dystrophies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review