Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 759

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Uniclust databases of clustered and deeply annotated protein sequences and alignments

Open access
Mirdita, Milot, von den Driesch, Lars, Galiez, Clovis, Martin, Maria J., Söding, Johannes, Steinegger, Martin·2017·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

We present three clustered protein sequence databases, Uniclust90, Uniclust50, Uniclust30 and three databases of multiple sequence alignments (MSAs), Uniboost10, Uniboost20 and Uniboost30, as a resource for protein sequence analysis, function prediction and sequence searches. The Uniclust databases cluster UniProtKB sequences at the level of 90%, 50% and 30% pairwise sequence identity. Uniclust90 and Uniclust50 clusters showed better consistency of functional annotation than those of UniRef90 and UniRef50, owing to an optimised clustering pipeline that runs with our MMseqs2 software for fast and sensitive protein sequence searching and clustering. Uniclust sequences are annotated with matches to Pfam, SCOP domains, and proteins in the PDB, using our HHblits homology detection tool. Due to its high sensitivity, Uniclust contains 17% more Pfam domain annotations than UniProt. Uniboost MSAs of three diversities are built by enriching the Uniclust30 MSAs with local sequence matches from MMseqs2 profile searches through Uniclust30. All databases can be downloaded from the Uniclust server at uniclust.mmseqs.com. Users can search clusters by keywords and explore their MSAs, taxonomic representation, and annotations. Uniclust is updated every two months with the new UniProt release.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkw1081

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1093/nar/gku989 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1093/nar/gks1195 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1146/annurev-animal-090414-014900 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1126/science.1251385 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1093/nar/gkt1183 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.5.458 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/protein/15.8.643 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq527 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Finn, 2015, The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future, Nucleic Acids Res., 44, D279, 10.1093/nar/gkv1344 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1093/nar/27.1.254 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw006 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/bib/bbr036 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/TVCG.2011.185 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Yachdav G. Wilzbach S. Rauscher B. Sheridan R. Sillitoe I. Procter J. Lewis S. Rost B. Goldberg T. MSAViewer: interactive JavaScript visualization of multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 2016. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw474. · DOI
  16. 10.1093/molbev/msw046 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/nar/gku1179 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Lin D. Proc. Fifteenth Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. 1998. An information-theoretic definition of similarity. p. 296-304.
  19. Azuaje F. Wang H. Bodenreider O. Proc. ISMB’2005 SIG Meet. Bio-ontologies. 2005. Ontology-driven similarity approaches to supporting gene functional assessment. p. 9-10.
  20. 10.1038/msb.2011.75 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Mirdita, M., von den Driesch, L., Galiez, C., Martin, M. J., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2016-11-28
Volume
45
Issue
D1
Pages
D170-D176
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2557595285
Cited by
759
References
4
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.