The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Uniclust databases of clustered and deeply annotated protein sequences and alignments
Open accessAbstract
We present three clustered protein sequence databases, Uniclust90, Uniclust50, Uniclust30 and three databases of multiple sequence alignments (MSAs), Uniboost10, Uniboost20 and Uniboost30, as a resource for protein sequence analysis, function prediction and sequence searches. The Uniclust databases cluster UniProtKB sequences at the level of 90%, 50% and 30% pairwise sequence identity. Uniclust90 and Uniclust50 clusters showed better consistency of functional annotation than those of UniRef90 and UniRef50, owing to an optimised clustering pipeline that runs with our MMseqs2 software for fast and sensitive protein sequence searching and clustering. Uniclust sequences are annotated with matches to Pfam, SCOP domains, and proteins in the PDB, using our HHblits homology detection tool. Due to its high sensitivity, Uniclust contains 17% more Pfam domain annotations than UniProt. Uniboost MSAs of three diversities are built by enriching the Uniclust30 MSAs with local sequence matches from MMseqs2 profile searches through Uniclust30. All databases can be downloaded from the Uniclust server at uniclust.mmseqs.com. Users can search clusters by keywords and explore their MSAs, taxonomic representation, and annotations. Uniclust is updated every two months with the new UniProt release.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank
Berman, H., Henrick, K., & Nakamura, H. (2003) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb1203-980 · Cited by 3,093
HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment
Remmert, M., Biegert, A., Hauser, A., & Söding, J. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1818 · Cited by 2,288
Self-citationUniRef clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches
Suzek, B. E., Wang, Y., Huang, H., McGarvey, P. B., Wu, C. H., & the UniProt Consortium (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu739 · Cited by 1,928
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- 10.1093/nar/gku989 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gks1195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev-animal-090414-014900 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1251385 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkt1183 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.5.458 · DOI
- 10.1093/protein/15.8.643 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq527 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · DOI · Paper page
- Finn, 2015, The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future, Nucleic Acids Res., 44, D279, 10.1093/nar/gkv1344 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/27.1.254 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw006 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbr036 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2011.185 · DOI · Paper page
- Yachdav G. Wilzbach S. Rauscher B. Sheridan R. Sillitoe I. Procter J. Lewis S. Rost B. Goldberg T. MSAViewer: interactive JavaScript visualization of multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 2016. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw474. · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msw046 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gku1179 · DOI · Paper page
- Lin D. Proc. Fifteenth Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. 1998. An information-theoretic definition of similarity. p. 296-304.
- Azuaje F. Wang H. Bodenreider O. Proc. ISMB’2005 SIG Meet. Bio-ontologies. 2005. Ontology-driven similarity approaches to supporting gene functional assessment. p. 9-10.
- 10.1038/msb.2011.75 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Self-citationColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all
Mirdita, M., Schütze, K., Moriwaki, Y., Heo, L., Ovchinnikov, S., & Steinegger, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · Cited by 9,391
Self-citationAccurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a 3-track network
Baek, M., DiMaio, F., Anishchenko, I., Dauparas, J., Ovchinnikov, S., Lee, G. R., Wang, J., Cong, Q., Kinch, L. N., Schaeffer, R. D., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.06.14.448402 · Cited by 5,549
Rives, A., Meier, J., Sercu, T., Goyal, S., Lin, Z., Liu, J., Guo, D., Ott, M., Zitnick, C. L., Ma, J., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · Cited by 3,286
Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning
Senior, A. W., Evans, R., Jumper, J., Kirkpatrick, J., Sifre, L., Green, T., Qin, C., Žídek, A., Nelson, A. W. R., Bridgland, A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · Cited by 3,378
Blanco-Míguez, A., Beghini, F., Cumbo, F., McIver, L. J., Thompson, K. N., Zolfo, M., Manghi, P., Dubois, L., Huang, K. D., Thomas, A. M., et al. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01688-w · Cited by 1,442
HH-suite3 for fast remote homology detection and deep protein annotation
Steinegger, M., Meier, M., Mirdita, M., Vöhringer, H., Haunsberger, S. J., & Söding, J. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · Cited by 1,145
Self-citationImproved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2
Bryant, P., Pozzati, G., & Elofsson, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.15.460468 · Cited by 1,022
Clustering huge protein sequence sets in linear time
Steinegger, M., & Söding, J. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04964-5 · Cited by 875
Self-citationProtein Sequence Analysis Using the MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit
Gabler, F., Nam, S., Till, S., Mirdita, M., Steinegger, M., Söding, J., Lupas, A. N., & Alva, V. (2020) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/cpbi.108 · Cited by 831
Self-citationProtGPT2 is a deep unsupervised language model for protein design
Ferruz, N., Schmidt, S., & Höcker, B. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32007-7 · Cited by 795
Language models enable zero-shot prediction of the effects of mutations on protein function
Meier, J., Rao, R., Verkuil, R., Liu, J., Sercu, T., & Rives, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.07.09.450648 · Cited by 635
MMseqs2 desktop and local web server app for fast, interactive sequence searches
Mirdita, M., Steinegger, M., & Söding, J. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1057 · Cited by 618
Self-citationThe person-to-person transmission landscape of the gut and oral microbiomes
Valles-Colomer, M., Blanco-Míguez, A., Manghi, P., Asnicar, F., Dubois, L., Golzato, D., Armanini, F., Cumbo, F., Huang, K. D., Manara, S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05620-1 · Cited by 449
Single-sequence protein structure prediction using language models from deep learning
Chowdhury, R., Bouatta, N., Biswas, S., Rochereau, C., Church, G. M., Sorger, P. K., & AlQuraishi, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.02.454840 · Cited by 455
“As a test set, we used 222 orphan proteins that constitute a complete cluster in the Uniclust30 dataset 40 ( i.e., they have no homologs).”
MethodSingle-sequence protein structure prediction using a language model and deep learning
Chowdhury, R., Bouatta, N., Biswas, S., Floristean, C., Kharkar, A., Roy, K., Rochereau, C., Ahdritz, G., Zhang, J., Church, G. M., et al. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01432-w · Cited by 455
Protein-level assembly increases protein sequence recovery from metagenomic samples manyfold
Steinegger, M., Mirdita, M., & Söding, J. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0437-4 · Cited by 445
Self-citationAhdritz, G., Bouatta, N., Floristean, C., Kadyan, S., Xia, Q., Gerecke, W., O’Donnell, T. J., Berenberg, D., Fisk, I., Zanichelli, N., et al. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02272-z · Cited by 439
An expanded arsenal of immune systems that protect bacteria from phages
Millman, A., Melamed, S., Leavitt, A., Doron, S., Bernheim, A., Hör, J., Garb, J., Bechon, N., Brandis, A., Lopatina, A., et al. (2022) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2022.09.017 · Cited by 428
Distance-based protein folding powered by deep learning
Xu, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1821309116 · Cited by 401
Rives, A., Meier, J., Sercu, T., Goyal, S., Lin, Z., Liu, J., Guo, D., Ott, M., Zitnick, C. L., Ma, J., et al. (2019) · doi:10.1101/622803 · Cited by 3,280
“MSAs for the baselines are generated from the UniClust30 (Mirdita et al., 2017) database using 3 iterations of search by Hhblits.”
MethodIaniro, G., Punčochář, M., Karcher, N., Porcari, S., Armanini, F., Asnicar, F., Beghini, F., Blanco-Míguez, A., Cumbo, F., Manghi, P., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01964-3 · Cited by 366
Rao, R., Liu, J., Verkuil, R., Meier, J., Canny, J. F., Abbeel, P., Sercu, T., & Rives, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.02.12.430858 · Cited by 350
Levy Karin, E., Mirdita, M., & Söding, J. (2020) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00808-x · Cited by 299
“Since the majority 307 (77%) of MetaEuk predictions were based on homologies to the MERC dataset, for which no 308 taxonomic annotation is available, we queried the MetaEuk marine proteins collection against 309 the Uniclust90 dataset [39] and the MMETSP dataset, both annotated using NCBI taxonomy 310 (see Methods).”
MethodSelf-citationTubiana, J., Schneidman-Duhovny, D., & Wolfson, H. J. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01490-7 · Cited by 274
AF2Complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning
Gao, M., Nakajima An, D., Parks, J. M., & Skolnick, J. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29394-2 · Cited by 252
SPEACH_AF: Sampling protein ensembles and conformational heterogeneity with Alphafold2
Stein, R. A., & Mchaourab, H. S. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010483 · Cited by 258
Deep‐learning contact‐map guided protein structure prediction in CASP13
Zheng, W., Li, Y., Zhang, C., Pearce, R., Mortuza, S. M., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25792 · Cited by 208
AFsample: improving multimer prediction with AlphaFold using massive sampling
Wallner, B. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad573 · Cited by 164
SPOT-Disorder2: Improved Protein Intrinsic Disorder Prediction by Ensembled Deep Learning
Hanson, J., Paliwal, K. K., Litfin, T., & Zhou, Y. (2019) · Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2019.01.004 · Cited by 165
Karcher, N., Nigro, E., Punčochář, M., Blanco-Míguez, A., Ciciani, M., Manghi, P., Zolfo, M., Cumbo, F., Manara, S., Golzato, D., et al. (2021) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02427-7 · Cited by 159
Protein language model embeddings for fast, accurate, alignment-free protein structure prediction
Weissenow, K., Heinzinger, M., & Rost, B. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.07.31.454572 · Cited by 139
AlphaFold2-aware protein–DNA binding site prediction using graph transformer
Yuan, Q., Chen, S., Rao, J., Zheng, S., Zhao, H., & Yang, Y. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab564 · Cited by 137
Unifying the known and unknown microbial coding sequence space
Vanni, C., Schechter, M. S., Acinas, S. G., Barberán, A., Buttigieg, P. L., Casamayor, E. O., Delmont, T. O., Duarte, C. M., Eren, A. M., Finn, R. D., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.67667 · Cited by 134
Self-citationFang, X., Wang, F., Liu, L., He, J., Lin, D., Xiang, Y., Zhu, K., Zhang, X., Wu, H., Li, H., et al. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00721-6 · Cited by 132
Li, Y., Zhang, C., Bell, E. W., Yu, D., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25798 · Cited by 94
Structure prediction of alternative protein conformations
Bryant, P., & Noé, F. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51507-2 · Cited by 105
Enhancing alphafold-multimer-based protein complex structure prediction with MULTICOM in CASP15
Liu, J., Guo, Z., Wu, T., Roy, R. S., Quadir, F., Chen, C., & Cheng, J. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05525-3 · Cited by 86
BFVD—a large repository of predicted viral protein structures
Kim, R. S., Levy Karin, E., Mirdita, M., Chikhi, R., & Steinegger, M. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae1119 · Cited by 86
Self-citationBat genomes illuminate adaptations to viral tolerance and disease resistance
Morales, A. E., Dong, Y., Brown, T., Baid, K., Kontopoulos, D. G., Gonzalez, V., Huang, Z., Ahmed, A.-W., Bhuinya, A., Hilgers, L., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08471-0 · Cited by 78
Structure prediction of protein-ligand complexes from sequence information with Umol
Bryant, P., Kelkar, A., Guljas, A., Clementi, C., & Noé, F. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48837-6 · Cited by 75
Progressive assembly of multi-domain protein structures from cryo-EM density maps
Zhou, X., Li, Y., Zhang, C., Zheng, W., Zhang, G., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-022-00232-1 · Cited by 75
Identifying B-cell epitopes using AlphaFold2 predicted structures and pretrained language model
Zeng, Y., Wei, Z., Yuan, Q., Chen, S., Yu, W., Lu, Y., Gao, J., & Yang, Y. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad187 · Cited by 73
Computational design of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins
Glasscock, C. J., Pecoraro, R. J., McHugh, R., Doyle, L. A., Chen, W., Boivin, O., Lonnquist, B., Na, E., Politanska, Y., Haddox, H. K., et al. (2025) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-025-01669-4 · Cited by 58
Improved Multimer Prediction using Massive Sampling with AlphaFold in CASP15
Wallner, B. (2023) · doi:10.22541/au.168170986.60158084/v1 · Cited by 53
Improved multimer prediction using massive sampling with AlphaFold in CASP15
Wallner, B. (2023) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26562 · Cited by 53
Zeng, W., Dou, Y., Pan, L., Xu, L., & Peng, S. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52293-7 · Cited by 49
Merizo: a rapid and accurate protein domain segmentation method using invariant point attention
Lau, A. M., Kandathil, S. M., & Jones, D. T. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43934-4 · Cited by 48
Histones predate the split between bacteria and archaea
Alva, V., & Lupas, A. N. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1000 · Cited by 43
Wehrspan, Z. J., McDonnell, R. T., & Elcock, A. H. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167377 · Cited by 45
Chen, C., Wu, T., Guo, Z., & Cheng, J. (2021) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26052 · Cited by 44
Protein quaternary structures in solution are a mixture of multiple forms
Marciano, S., Dey, D., Listov, D., Fleishman, S. J., Sonn-Segev, A., Mertens, H., Busch, F., Kim, Y., Harvey, S. R., Wysocki, V. H., et al. (2022) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d2sc02794a · Cited by 41
Evolutionary gain and loss of a plant pattern-recognition receptor for HAMP recognition
Snoeck, S., Abramson, B. W., Garcia, A. G., Egan, A. N., Michael, T. P., & Steinbrenner, A. D. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.81050 · Cited by 37
Interpreting the molecular mechanisms of disease variants in human transmembrane proteins
Tiemann, J. K. S., Zschach, H., Lindorff-Larsen, K., & Stein, A. (2023) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2022.12.031 · Cited by 35
Structural pathway for PI3-kinase regulation by VPS15 in autophagy
Cook, A. S. I., Chen, M., Nguyen, T. N., Cabezudo, A. C., Khuu, G., Rao, S., Garcia, S. N., Yang, M., Iavarone, A. T., Ren, X., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adl3787 · Cited by 34
Using AlphaFold for Rapid and Accurate Fixed Backbone Protein Design
Moffat, L., Greener, J. G., & Jones, D. T. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.24.457549 · Cited by 33
Improving protein tertiary structure prediction by deep learning and distance prediction in CASP14
Liu, J., Wu, T., Guo, Z., Hou, J., & Cheng, J. (2022) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26186 · Cited by 32
Accurate and robust protein sequence design with CarbonDesign
Ren, M., Yu, C., Bu, D., & Zhang, H. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00838-2 · Cited by 30
Zhang, C., Zheng, W., Cheng, M., Omenn, G. S., Freddolino, P. L., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00359 · Cited by 27
ProtMamba: a homology-aware but alignment-free protein state space model
Sgarbossa, D., Malbranke, C., & Bitbol, A.-F. (2025) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf348 · Cited by 27
Liu, J., Zhao, K., & Zhang, G. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac507 · Cited by 25
HybridGCN for protein solubility prediction with adaptive weighting of multiple features
Chen, L., Wu, R., Zhou, F., Zhang, H., & Liu, J. K. (2023) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-023-00788-8 · Cited by 25
Design in the DARK: Learning Deep Generative Models for De Novo Protein Design
Moffat, L., Kandathil, S. M., & Jones, D. T. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.01.27.478087 · Cited by 25
Assessing and enhancing foldability in designed proteins
Listov, D., Lipsh‐Sokolik, R., Rosset, S., Yang, C., Correia, B. E., & Fleishman, S. J. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4400 · Cited by 24
Atomic resolution ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins with Alphafold
Schnapka, V., Morozova, T. I., Sen, S., & Bonomi, M. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-69172-y · Cited by 23
Rational exploration of fold atlas for human solute carrier proteins
Xie, T., Chi, X., Huang, B., Ye, F., Zhou, Q., & Huang, J. (2022) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2022.05.015 · Cited by 23
Can Protein Structure Prediction Methods Capture Alternative Conformations of Membrane Transporters?
Xie, T., & Huang, J. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01936 · Cited by 23
Discovery of archaeal Fusexins homologous to eukaryotic HAP2/GCS1 gamete fusion proteins
Moi, D., Nishio, S., Li, X., Valansi, C., Langleib, M., Brukman, N. G., Flyak, K., Dessimoz, C., de Sanctis, D., Tunyasuvunakool, K., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.13.464100 · Cited by 23
Himmel, N. J., Moi, D., & Benton, R. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.10.008 · Cited by 23
Feng, S.-H., Xia, C.-Q., & Shen, H.-B. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab744 · Cited by 21
Structural analogue-based protein structure domain assembly assisted by deep learning
Peng, C.-X., Zhou, X.-G., Xia, Y.-H., Liu, J., Hou, M.-H., & Zhang, G.-J. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac553 · Cited by 21
Fast, accurate ranking of engineered proteins by target-binding propensity using structure modeling
Ding, X., Chen, X., Sullivan, E. E., Shay, T. F., & Gradinaru, V. (2024) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2024.04.003 · Cited by 20
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Kagaya, Y., Terashi, G., Zhao, B., Xiong, Y., & Kihara, D. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-08783-5 · Cited by 19
“To construct an MSA for a query protein, similar sequences were searched on the Uniref30 database 38 .”
Exploring a diverse world of effector domains and amyloid signaling motifs in fungal NLR proteins
Wojciechowski, J. W., Tekoglu, E., Gąsior-Głogowska, M., Coustou, V., Szulc, N., Szefczyk, M., Kopaczyńska, M., Saupe, S. J., & Dyrka, W. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010787 · Cited by 19
A-Prot: protein structure modeling using MSA transformer
Hong, Y., Lee, J., & Ko, J. (2022) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-022-04628-8 · Cited by 19
Protein oligomer modeling guided by predicted interchain contacts in CASP14
Baek, M., Anishchenko, I., Park, H., Humphreys, I. R., & Baker, D. (2021) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26197 · Cited by 18
PRESCOTT: a population aware, epistatic, and structural model accurately predicts missense effects
Tekpinar, M., David, L., Henry, T., & Carbone, A. (2025) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-025-03581-y · Cited by 18
Molecular insights into the activation of Mre11-Rad50 endonuclease activity by Sae2/CtIP
Nicolas, Y., Bret, H., Cannavo, E., Acharya, A., Cejka, P., Borde, V., & Guerois, R. (2024) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.05.019 · Cited by 12
A paired sequence language model for protein-protein interaction modeling
Liu, J., Chen, H., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-70457-5 · Cited by 8
Identification and characterization of substrate- and product-selective nylon hydrolases
Drufva, E. E., Cahill, J. F., Saint-Vincent, P. M. B., Williams, A. N., Bocharova, V., Capra, N., Meilleur, F., Carper, D. L., Bourgery, C., Miyazaki, K., et al. (2025) · Chem Catalysis · doi:10.1016/j.checat.2025.101418 · Cited by 7
Sawa, T., Moriwaki, Y., Jiang, H., Murase, K., Takayama, S., Shimizu, K., & Terada, T. (2023) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2023.10.026 · Cited by 6
Construct a variable-length fragment library for de novo protein structure prediction
Feng, Q., Hou, M., Liu, J., Zhao, K., & Zhang, G. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac086 · Cited by 5
The C-terminal tail of CSNAP attenuates the CSN complex
Füzesi-Levi, M. G., Ben-Nissan, G., Listov, D., Fridmann Sirkis, Y., Hayouka, Z., Fleishman, S., & Sharon, M. (2023) · Life Science Alliance · doi:10.26508/lsa.202201634 · Cited by 5
Protein language model identifies disordered, conserved motifs implicated in phase separation
Zhang, Y., Zheng, J., & Zhang, B. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.105309 · Cited by 4
“Homologous sequences were identified through searches against the UniRef30 protein database (release 2023/02) ( Mirdita et al., 2017 ).”
Protein Quaternary Structures in Solution are a Mixture of Multiple forms
Marciano, S., Dey, D., Listov, D., Fleishman, S. J., Sonn-Segev, A., Mertens, H., Busch, F., Kim, Y., Harvey, S. R., Wysocki, V. H., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.03.30.486392 · Cited by 3
RAG-ESM: Improving Pretrained Protein Language Models via Sequence Retrieval
Sgarbossa, D., & Bitbol, A.-F. (2025) · PRX Life · doi:10.1103/db1b-hy16 · Cited by 3
Improved prediction of site‐rates from structure with averaging across homologs
Norn, C., Oliveira, F., & André, I. (2024) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5086 · Cited by 3
Xia, Y., Pu, Y., Wang, S., Zhuang, J., Liu, D., Hou, M., & Zhang, G. (2025) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169128 · Cited by 2
Lipophilic modification of salirasib modulates the antiproliferative and antimigratory activity
Ballari, M. S., O. J. Porta, E., Zalazar, E. A., Etichetti, C. M. B., Padrón, J. M., Girardini, J. E., & Labadie, G. R. (2023) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2023.117417 · Cited by 2
Caspase-1 activates gasdermin A in non-mammals
Billman, Z. P., Kovacs, S. B., Wei, B., Kang, K., Cissé, O. H., & Miao, E. A. (2024) · doi:10.7554/elife.92362.3 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Mirdita, M., von den Driesch, L., Galiez, C., Martin, M. J., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-11-28
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- D170-D176
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2557595285
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.