Cited by 554Stress Responses and CortisolNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 71 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Social isolation

Open access
Cacioppo, John T., Hawkley, Louise C., Norman, Greg J., Berntson, Gary G.·2011·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Social species, by definition, form organizations that extend beyond the individual. These structures evolved hand in hand with behavioral, neural, hormonal, cellular, and genetic mechanisms to support them because the consequent social behaviors helped these organisms survive, reproduce, and care for offspring sufficiently long that they too reproduced. Social isolation represents a lens through which to investigate these behavioral, neural, hormonal, cellular, and genetic mechanisms. Evidence from human and nonhuman animal studies indicates that isolation heightens sensitivity to social threats (predator evasion) and motivates the renewal of social connections. The effects of perceived isolation in humans share much in common with the effects of experimental manipulations of isolation in nonhuman social species: increased tonic sympathetic tonus and HPA activation; and decreased inflammatory control, immunity, sleep salubrity, and expression of genes regulating glucocorticoid responses. Together, these effects contribute to higher rates of morbidity and mortality in older adults.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06028.x

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

42 Not checked yet · 11 Own interpretation · 1 Supported · 1 Supported so far · 1 No basis given

Verify all 68 references — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 26
26 of 26
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Humans need others to survive and prosper.

    “In ontogeny and phylogeny, humans need others to survive and prosper.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The presence of others, even ostensive friends, may constitute a social threat at any moment in time.

    “Given shifting alliances and malleable social hierarchies, the presence of others, even ostensive friends, may constitute a social threat at any moment in time.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The objective presence of others is not sufficient to ensure the social connections needed for human survival and prosperity.

    “The objective presence of others, therefore, is not sufficient to ensure the social connections needed for human survival and prosperity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Early in human history, survival and prosperity depended on banding together in couples, families, and tribes for mutual protection and assistance.

    “Early in our history as a species, we survived and prospered only by banding together—in couples, in families, in tribes—to provide mutual protection and assistance.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.2307/2136848 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90259-S · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1093/geronb/63.6.S375 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1037/a0014400 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.140 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cacioppo J.T., Handbook of Social Exclusion

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 554

Metadata

Authors
Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., Norman, G. J., & Berntson, G. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Cacioppo, John T.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-08
Volume
1231
Issue
1
Pages
17-22
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2332324138
Cited by
554
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 RG999999)
  • National Institute on Aging (R37AG033590, R01AG034052)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
social isolation, social behavior, social danger, predator escape, social connectedness, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, sympathetic nervous system, inflammation, immunity, sleep, glucocorticoid response, gene expression, aging, morbidity and mortality
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Humans, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Interpersonal Relations, Loneliness, Mental Health, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Quality of Life, Social Isolation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-04, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-04 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review