Cited by 63Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 198 of the 198 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 44 of the 288 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Toward the development of a molecular toolkit for the microbial remediation of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances

Open access
Hu, Miao, Scott, Colin·2024·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are highly fluorinated synthetic organic compounds that have been used extensively in various industries owing to their unique properties. The PFAS family encompasses diverse classes, with only a fraction being commercially relevant. These substances are found in the environment, including in water sources, soil, and wildlife, leading to human exposure and fueling concerns about potential human health impacts. Although PFAS degradation is challenging, biodegradation offers a promising, eco-friendly solution. Biodegradation has been effective for a variety of organic contaminants but is yet to be successful for PFAS due to a paucity of identified microbial species capable of transforming these compounds. Recent studies have investigated PFAS biotransformation and fluoride release; however, the number of specific microorganisms and enzymes with demonstrable activity with PFAS remains limited. This review discusses enzymes that could be used in PFAS metabolism, including haloacid dehalogenases, reductive dehalogenases, cytochromes P450, alkane and butane monooxygenases, peroxidases, laccases, desulfonases, and the mechanisms of microbial resistance to intracellular fluoride. Finally, we emphasize the potential of enzyme and microbial engineering to advance PFAS degradation strategies and provide insights for future research in this field.

Verifying this paper

8 of 9 steps done · this page updates itself — you can leave and come back

  1. Registry recordVerified
  2. Full textRead the full text
  3. Reference list198 references found
  4. Reference checkChecking each cited work — 198 of 198
  5. StatisticsRecomputed
  6. Claims192 claims anchored to a quote
  7. Cited sourcesChecked
  8. Self-checkChecked
  9. VerificationFindings verified

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review surveys the enzymes proposed to catalyze PFAS defluorination (haloacid dehalogenases, reductive dehalogenases, cytochromes P450, alkane/butane monooxygenases, peroxidases, laccases, desulfonases) and the supporting molecular processes (fluoride resistance, PFAS uptake), arguing that a progenitor "biochemical toolkit" for PFAS biodegradation already exists and could be advanced through enzyme and microbial engineering.

Key findings

  • Fluoroacetate dehalogenases are the best-characterized defluorinases: e.g., RPA1163 defluorinates bulky substrates (2-fluoro-2-phenyl acetic acid), 2-fluoropropionic acid, 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropionic acid, and difluoroacetate; DAR3835, NOS0089, and POL4478 act on difluoroacetate, 2,2-difluoropropionic acid, and 5,5,5-trifluoropentanoic acid; RJO0230 is implicated in 6:2 FTOH/6:2 FTSA defluorination via inhibition tests and heterologous expression in *Rhodococcus opacus* PD631.
  • Reported PFAS transformation extents vary widely and are largely indirect: HRP removed ~68% of PFOA (850 µM initial) but released <1% fluoride (2 mg/L measured vs 165 mg/L theoretical); laccase–HBT degraded ~50% of PFOA (0.5 µM) over 157 days with 28% defluorination, and PFOS degradation was 59% (0.59 µM) with Cu2+ vs 35% (0.35 µM) with Mg2+ over 162 days; *Acidimicrobium* sp. A6 defluorinated PFOS and PFOA up to 60% under iron-reducing conditions.
  • Reductive defluorination of PFAS remains unproven and contested: there is no direct evidence for it, organofluoride redox midpoint potentials may be too low (as low as −2,700 mV), and no reductive dehalogenase gene transcription was observed during KB-1 consortium defluorination.
  • Fluoride resistance machinery is well understood (fluoride riboswitches, Fluc channels with 10,000-fold F−/Cl− specificity, CLCF antiporters), but microbial PFAS uptake is a substantial knowledge gap; most candidate enzymes are intracellular or membrane-bound.

Methods

  • Narrative review of published literature on PFAS biotransformation, organized by enzyme class, with proposed reactions tabulated (Table 1) and representative haloacid dehalogenases summarized (Table 2: 7 proteins with UniProt/PDB entries, sources, and substrates).
  • Evidence base spans crystallography, QM/MM and molecular dynamics calculations, site-directed mutagenesis, inhibition tests, heterologous expression, transcriptomics/proteomics, and culture-based defluorination assays from cited primary studies.
  • Perspective/Outlook section evaluates evidence standards and proposes enzyme engineering, microbial engineering, and AI/machine-learning-guided design as routes forward.

Limitations

  • Stated: many PFAS biodegradation reports rely on indirect or incomplete evidence — fluoride release or substrate loss alone is insufficient; all reaction products and mass balances are needed; gene/enzyme claims require knockouts, complementation, heterologous expression, or in vitro evidence; PFAS uptake mechanisms in microbes are largely unknown; extracellular enzyme strategies preclude cofactor-dependent enzymes.
  • Evident from the text (not framed as limitations by the authors): several headline results are statistically weak or incomplete — e.g., the engineered *E. coli* PFOA defluorination showed no statistically significant fluoride difference vs controls; the A6 reductive dehalogenase gene sequence is missing >100 C-terminal amino acids and lacks direct functional evidence; SsuD desulfonation of 6:2 FTSA lacks detection of the required aldehyde product.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.00157-24

Cites

198 of 198 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Fig 1 Classification of PFAS compounds. Abbreviations and structures of PFAS subclasses are mentioned in this review. This figure was created with BioRender.com.
Fig 1 Classification of PFAS compounds. Abbreviations and structures of PFAS subclasses are mentioned in this review. This figure was created with BioRender.com.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 2 Hydrolytic defluorinases. Cartoon representation of the dimeric structures of the fluoroacetate dehalogenase (A) and defluorinating haloacid dehalogenase (B) from Rhodopseudomonas palustris (PDB 3R3W) (67) and Polaromonas sp. JS666 (PDB 3UM9) (PDB DOI: https://doi.org/10.2210/pdb3um9/pdb), respectively. The homodimers are shown with the two identical chains shown in green and cyan. A more detailed view of the active sites is shown (C and D) with the nucleophilic aspartate residue shown (Asp*, this is an Asn residue in the Asp110Asn variant of fluoroacetate dehalogenase shown). The substrate is bound in fluoroacetate dehalogenase (FA, orange), and the residues that stabilize the charge developed on the fluoride (halide pocket, purple) are also shown. The reaction mechanism is shown (E; an SN2 nucleophilic attack, followed by the formation of a tetrahedral intermediate and regeneration of the nucleophile via attack by water). This figure was created with BioRender.com.
Fig 2 Hydrolytic defluorinases. Cartoon representation of the dimeric structures of the fluoroacetate dehalogenase (A) and defluorinating haloacid dehalogenase (B) from Rhodopseudomonas palustris (PDB 3R3W) (67) and Polaromonas sp. JS666 (PDB 3UM9) (PDB DOI: https://doi.org/10.2210/pdb3um9/pdb), respectively. The homodimers are shown with the two identical chains shown in green and cyan. A more detailed view of the active sites is shown (C and D) with the nucleophilic aspartate residue shown (Asp*, this is an Asn residue in the Asp110Asn variant of fluoroacetate dehalogenase shown). The substrate is bound in fluoroacetate dehalogenase (FA, orange), and the residues that stabilize the charge developed on the fluoride (halide pocket, purple) are also shown. The reaction mechanism is shown (E; an SN2 nucleophilic attack, followed by the formation of a tetrahedral intermediate and regeneration of the nucleophile via attack by water). This figure was created with BioRender.com.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 3 Reductive dehalogenase. Cartoon representation of the structure of the reductive dehalogenase, PCE, from Sulfurospirillum multivorans (PDB 5MA1) (92). The dimer is shown on the left, with the two identical chains shown in green and blue. A more detailed view of the active site is given on the right, showing the iron and sulfur of the two [4Fe-4S] clusters as red and yellow spheres, respectively. Cobalamin is shown as green sticks, and the substrate (2,4,6-tribromophenol) is shown in pink. This figure was created with BioRender.com.
Fig 3 Reductive dehalogenase. Cartoon representation of the structure of the reductive dehalogenase, PCE, from Sulfurospirillum multivorans (PDB 5MA1) (92). The dimer is shown on the left, with the two identical chains shown in green and blue. A more detailed view of the active site is given on the right, showing the iron and sulfur of the two [4Fe-4S] clusters as red and yellow spheres, respectively. Cobalamin is shown as green sticks, and the substrate (2,4,6-tribromophenol) is shown in pink. This figure was created with BioRender.com.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 4 Overview of the cytochrome P450-mediated defluorination of 4-fluorophenol. 4-Fluorophenol binds to complex I, which displaces fluoride via attack of the oxygen of complex I on the fluorinated carbon to form a semiquinone, which is then reduced to form 4-hydroxyphenol.
Fig 4 Overview of the cytochrome P450-mediated defluorination of 4-fluorophenol. 4-Fluorophenol binds to complex I, which displaces fluoride via attack of the oxygen of complex I on the fluorinated carbon to form a semiquinone, which is then reduced to form 4-hydroxyphenol.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 5 Schematic regarding uptake and desulfonation of alkanesulfonates and taurine by (A) TauABCD and (B) SsuEADCB systems, based on data from van der Ploeg et al. (153). This figure was created with BioRender.com.
Fig 5 Schematic regarding uptake and desulfonation of alkanesulfonates and taurine by (A) TauABCD and (B) SsuEADCB systems, based on data from van der Ploeg et al. (153). This figure was created with BioRender.com.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 6 Bacterial response to fluoride toxicity. Hydrogen fluoride and fluoride (F−) are present in pH-dependent equilibrium, and only HF can cross biological membranes without the aid of efflux channels. At low environmental pH, this drives the accumulation of intracellular F−. F− -responsive riboswitches bind F−, allowing the translation of F−-specific efflux proteins, including Fluc F− channel (PDB: 6B2A) (177) and the H+/F− CLCF antiporter (PDB: 36D0J) (178). This figure was created with BioRender.com.
Fig 6 Bacterial response to fluoride toxicity. Hydrogen fluoride and fluoride (F−) are present in pH-dependent equilibrium, and only HF can cross biological membranes without the aid of efflux channels. At low environmental pH, this drives the accumulation of intracellular F−. F− -responsive riboswitches bind F−, allowing the translation of F−-specific efflux proteins, including Fluc F− channel (PDB: 6B2A) (177) and the H+/F− CLCF antiporter (PDB: 36D0J) (178). This figure was created with BioRender.com.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

78 Not checked yet · 59 No full text of the sources · 23 Own interpretation · 12 Partly supported · 8 Supported · 6 Supported so far · 5 No basis given · 1 Not supported · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 94 references — free account

Show all 88 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 56
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 63
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
104 of 104
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    PFAS biodegradation has been rarely demonstrated in natural environments.

    “However, for organofluorides, particularly PFAS, biodegradation has been rarely demonstrated in natural environments.”
1 of 1

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 198 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Ouellette RJ, Rawn JD. 2018. 3 - introduction to organic reaction mechanisms, p 51–86. In Ouellette RJ, Rawn JD (ed), Organic chemistry, 2nd ed. Academic Press.
  2. 10.1271/bbb1961.45.29 · DOI
  3. 10.1271/bbb1961.45.543 · DOI
  4. 10.1271/bbb1961.45.35 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/00021369.1981.10864721 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 63

Metadata

Authors
Hu, M., & Scott, C.
Affiliations
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Scott, Colin
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2024-04-17
Volume
90
Issue
4
Pages
e0015724-e0015724
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W4392892920
Cited by
63
References
198
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
DISR | Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CERC Postdoctoral Fellowship)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, microbial bioremediation, biotransformation, fluoride release, haloacid dehalogenase, reductive dehalogenase, cytochrome P450, alkane monooxygenase, peroxidase, laccase, enzyme engineering, microbial engineering
MeSH terms
Alkanes, Animals, Animals, Wild, Biodegradation, Environmental, Fluorides, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Water Pollutants, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review