Cited by 137Seed and Plant BiochemistryFood Science and Nutritional StudiesPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 153 of the 155 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 133 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Nutritional and Functional New Perspectives and Potential Health Benefits of Quinoa and Chia Seeds

Open access

Abstract

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) and chia (Salvia hispanica) are essential traditional crops with excellent nutritional properties. Quinoa is known for its high and good quality protein content and nine essential amino acids vital for an individual’s development and growth, whereas chia seeds contain high dietary fiber content, calories, lipids, minerals (calcium, magnesium, iron, phosphorus, and zinc), and vitamins (A and B complex). Chia seeds are also known for their presence of a high amount of omega-3 fatty acids. Both quinoa and chia seeds are gluten-free and provide medicinal properties due to bioactive compounds, which help combat various chronic diseases such as diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular diseases, and metabolic diseases such as cancer. Quinoa seeds possess phenolic compounds, particularly kaempferol, which can help prevent cancer. Many food products can be developed by fortifying quinoa and chia seeds in different concentrations to enhance their nutritional profile, such as extruded snacks, meat products, etc. Furthermore, it highlights the value-added products that can be developed by including quinoa and chia seeds, alone and in combination. This review focused on the recent development in quinoa and chia seeds nutritional, bioactive properties, and processing for potential human health and therapeutic applications.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Quinoa and chia are gluten-free traditional crops rich in protein, fiber, omega-3 fatty acids, minerals, vitamins, and bioactive compounds with antioxidant, antidiabetic, anticancer, and cardiovascular-related potential. The review synthesizes their nutritional profiles, bioactive properties, processing effects, and use in value-added foods, while calling for more human studies.

Key findings

  • Quinoa protein content is 13.8–16.5% (average 15%) and contains all nine essential amino acids; chia contains 15–23% protein, 30–34 g/100 g dietary fiber, and 25–40% fat, of which 83% is PUFAs, including omega-3 α-linolenic acid (64%) and omega-6 α-linolenic acid (20%). Table 1 reports per 100 g: quinoa protein 14.1 g, fat 6.10 g, fiber 7.00 g; chia protein 24.2 g, fat 40.2 g, fiber 34.4 g.
  • Quinoa bioactives include phenolics at 0.46–1.84 mg/g dry weight, phytosterols at 118 mg/100 g, and phytoecdysteroids at 138–570 µg/g; kaempferol is highlighted for anticancer potential via Nrf2/Keap1 pathways. Chia has ~98 mg total phenols (GAE/100 g), rosmarinic acid at 0.93 mg/g, and phytosterols at ~0.02%.
  • Both seeds are linked to health benefits such as antioxidant, antidiabetic, anticancer, antihypertensive, anti-inflammatory, and hypocholesterolemic effects; chia is especially noted as a plant source of omega-3 fatty acids.
  • Food applications include quinoa-fortified bread with 2% higher protein and 1% higher oil and fiber, pasta with 7.5% chia flour, a ready-to-eat porridge with 15% replacement of rice flour by a 1:1 quinoa:chia mix, cookies with 20% chia mucilage, and yogurt with 6% chia seeds plus 12% strawberry.

Methods

  • Narrative review of recent literature on quinoa and chia seeds, covering nutritional composition, bioactive compounds, processing, health benefits, and value-added food products.
  • Data are drawn from cited studies and nutrient composition tables, including Table 1 with per-100 g nutrient values for quinoa and chia.
  • Main analysis is qualitative synthesis; no systematic search strategy, inclusion criteria, meta-analysis, or primary experimental study is reported.

Limitations

  • The paper states that further studies are needed to reveal benefits to a larger population and to investigate effects on human health, and that challenges in including quinoa and chia in food products need study.
  • The paper notes that antioxidant properties of polyphenols have been widely demonstrated mainly in vitro, while in vivo biological relevance is questionable, especially for cardiovascular effects, due to low blood concentrations and extensive metabolism after ingestion.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not provide a systematic protocol or quantitative synthesis, and many health claims rely on cited animal, in vitro, or small human studies rather than large clinical trials.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/antiox12071413

Cites

153 of 153 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 133 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 62 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 42
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 2
43 of 43
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Chia seed germination is an effective and inexpensive method that can provide functional chia seed flour by increasing phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity, and GABA.

    “In addition, chia seeds germination is an effective and inexpensive method that can help provide functional chia seed flour by increasing the phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity, and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Chia is a strong contender for controlling diabetes because it contains dietary fiber (18–30%) and α-linolenic fatty acids.

    “Additionally, chia is a strong contender for controlling diabetes since it contains dietary fiber (18–30%), and α-linolenic fatty acids.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Chia seeds have a high caloric value of 486 kcal and contain about 2.3-, 8.3-, and 9.8-fold higher fiber per 100 g than oats, corn, and rice.

    “Chia seeds have a high caloric value of 486 kcal and contain ~2.3-, 8.3-, and 9.8-fold higher fiber per 100 g than oats, corn, and rice.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Chia nutrient quantities exceed 100 g per 100 g

    Major

    Table 1 lists 115.73 g of water, protein, fat, carbohydrates and ash per 100 g of chia seeds. These components cannot collectively exceed the stated 100 g serving.

    Reported 100 · recomputed 115.73

  • Listed quinoa amino acids exceed its total protein

    Minor

    Table 1's listed quinoa amino acids sum to 21.86 g per 100 g, substantially more than its reported 14.1 g of total protein per 100 g.

    Reported 14.1 · recomputed 21.86

  • Reported omega-3-to-omega-6 ratio is reversed

    Minor

    The stated 64% omega-3 and 20% omega-6 give an omega-3-to-omega-6 ratio of 3.2, not about 0.32-0.35. The reported ratio is approximately the inverse.

    Reported 0.32 · recomputed 3.2

  • Chia protein value falls outside the stated range

    Minor

    The text states that chia seeds contain 15-23% protein, but Table 1 lists 24.2 g per 100 g, or 24.2%.

4 of 4

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 155 references

2 of the 155 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Goyat, 2017, Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)—The unforgotten golden grain, IJFANS Int. J. Food Nutr. Sci., 7, 1
  2. Sharma, 2015, Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): A nutritional healthy grain, Int. J. Adv. Res., 3, 725
  3. Puri, 2020, Evaluation of the nutritional value of snacks prepared by fortification of gram flour with chia seeds, Int. J. Home Sci., 6, 35

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–137 of 137

Metadata

Authors
Agarwal, A., Rizwana, Tripathi, A. D., Kumar, T., Sharma, K. P., & Patel, S. K. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Delhi (IN)
  • Department of Food Technology, Bhaskaracharya College of Applied Sciences, Sector-2, Dwarka, New Delhi 110075, India
  • Banaras Hindu University (IN)
  • Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda (IN)
  • Central University of Haryana (IN)
  • Konkuk University (KR)
Corresponding author
Patel, Sanjay Kumar Singh
Venue
Antioxidants
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-07-12
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
1413
ISSN
2076-3921 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384202525
Cited by
135
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 7
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antioxidants (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food Science and Nutritional Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
quinoa, Salvia hispanica, nutritional properties, functional foods, bioactive compounds, kaempferol, phenolic compounds, omega-3 fatty acids, gluten-free foods, food fortification, value-added food products, chronic disease prevention, cancer prevention, extrusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review