Cited by 45Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Oxytocin receptors are widely distributed in the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) brain: Relation to social behavior, genetic polymorphisms, and the dopamine system

Open access
Inoue, Kiyoshi, Ford, Charles L., Horie, Kengo, Young, Larry J.·2022·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Oxytocin regulates social behavior via direct modulation of neurons, regulation of neural network activity, and interaction with other neurotransmitter systems. The behavioral effects of oxytocin signaling are determined by the species‐specific distribution of brain oxytocin receptors. The socially monogamous prairie vole has been a useful model organism for elucidating the role of oxytocin in social behaviors, including pair bonding, response to social loss, and consoling. However, there has been no comprehensive mapping of oxytocin receptor‐expressing cells throughout the prairie vole brain. Here, we employed a highly sensitive in situ hybridization, RNAscope, to construct an exhaustive, brain‐wide map of oxytocin receptor mRNA‐expressing cells. We found that oxytocin receptor mRNA expression was widespread and diffused throughout the brain, with specific areas displaying a particularly robust expression. Comparing receptor binding with mRNA revealed that regions of the hippocampus and substantia nigra contained oxytocin receptor protein but lacked mRNA, indicating that oxytocin receptors can be transported to distal neuronal processes, consistent with presynaptic oxytocin receptor functions. In the nucleus accumbens, a region involved in oxytocin‐dependent social bonding, oxytocin receptor mRNA expression was detected in both the D1 and D2 dopamine receptor‐expressing subtypes of cells. Furthermore, natural genetic polymorphisms robustly influenced oxytocin receptor expression in both D1 and D2 receptor cell types in the nucleus accumbens. Collectively, our findings further elucidate the extent to which oxytocin signaling is capable of influencing brain‐wide neural activity, responses to social stimuli, and social behavior. Key points: Oxytocin receptor mRNA is diffusely expressed throughout the brain, with strong expression concentrated in certain areas involved in social behavior. Oxytocin receptor mRNA expression and protein localization are misaligned in some areas, indicating that the receptor protein may be transported to distal processes. In the nucleus accumbens, oxytocin receptors are expressed on cells expressing both D1 and D2 dopamine receptor subtypes, and the majority of variation in oxytocin receptor expression between animals is attributable to polymorphisms in the oxytocin receptor gene.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study provides the first comprehensive brain-wide map of oxytocin receptor (*Oxtr*) mRNA in prairie voles using RNAscope, finding widespread expression across more than 250 brain regions with enrichment in social, reward, and memory areas. It also reports mRNA–protein mismatches suggesting presynaptic OXTR transport and shows that natural *Oxtr* polymorphisms strongly influence *Oxtr* expression in both D1R- and D2R-expressing nucleus accumbens cells.

Key findings

  • *Oxtr* mRNA was widespread and diffuse throughout the prairie vole brain, detected in over 250 distinct regions, with robust expression in nucleus accumbens, amygdala, BNST, VMH, hippocampal CA2/ventral CA1, cortical layers 2, 5, and 6, and other social/reward-related areas.
  • OXTR protein and *Oxtr* mRNA were mostly aligned, but mismatches occurred: hippocampal CA2 showed protein superficial and deep to the stratum pyramidale without mRNA there, and substantia nigra pars reticulata showed genotype-dependent OXTR binding in High-*Oxtr* voles but no *Oxtr* mRNA in either genotype, suggesting presynaptic receptors transported from distal somas.
  • In nucleus accumbens, *Oxtr* mRNA was detected in approximately 80% of cells; genotype had a main effect on *Oxtr* expression (*F*(1,20) = 74.20, *p* < 0.0001), accounting for 70.81% of variation, while cell type had a smaller main effect (*F*(1,20) = 20.90, *p* = 0.0002), accounting for 2.18% of variation.
  • High- versus Low-*Oxtr* genotype differences were significant in each sex-by-cell-type comparison (*p* < 0.01), and D1R versus D2R cells differed significantly only in High-*Oxtr* males (*p* = 0.0053), with D2R cells expressing slightly more *Oxtr*.

Methods

  • Adult prairie voles (16 male, 16 female; 150–220 days old) were used: 8 males and 8 females were homozygous for the High-*Oxtr* allele (C/C at NT213739), and 8 males and 8 females were homozygous for the Low-*Oxtr* allele (T/T at NT213739).
  • Chromogenic RNAscope in situ hybridization mapped *Oxtr* mRNA on every tenth section from four brains, with quantitative regions using at least 6 brains per genotype per sex; fluorescent multiplex RNAscope labeled *Oxtr*, *Drd1*, and *Drd2* in 24 brains; adjacent sections underwent OXTR autoradiography for mRNA–protein comparison.
  • Semi-quantitative mapping counted 80 hematoxylin-detected cells per region and binned *Oxtr*-positive cells into four groups; fluorescent analysis measured mean gray value for *Oxtr* in 20 D1R and 20 D2R cells per hemisphere (40 each per animal) and used a three-way mixed model ANOVA with cell type as a repeated measure and sex and genotype as between-subjects factors, followed by Šidák’s post hoc test.

Limitations

  • The paper states that only adult animals were used, so developmental changes in OXTR density cannot be addressed; autoradiography resolution was too low to identify with certainty which hippocampal layers contained OXTR protein; and Supplementary Table 1 was generated only from a male High-*Oxtr* brain, though the pattern was consistent across other brains except in genotype-dependent regions.
  • Evident from the text: the study is descriptive and correlational, with no behavioral or causal manipulation testing whether the mapped receptors or genotype effects produce specific social behaviors.
  • Evident from the text: the brain-wide mapping is semi-quantitative and relies on a rat brain atlas for regional definitions, and some quantitative comparisons use modest sample sizes.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.25382

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

4 tests recomputed · 0 with the reported and recomputed p on opposite sides of .05

Claims the paper makes

0 of 92 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Certain regions of the hippocampal formation, including CA2, ventral CA1, and the dentate gyrus, contained high levels of Oxtr mRNA, primarily restricted to the stratum pyramidale of CA fields and the granule cell and polymorph layers of the dentate gyrus.

    “Certain regions of the hippocampal formation, including CA2, ventral CA1, and the dentate gyrus, contained high levels of Oxtr mRNA, though it was primarily restricted to the stratum pyramidale of CA fields and the granule cell and polymorph layers of the dentate gyrus (Figure 6c,d, 4d, 2f).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    High-Oxtr voles expressed far more OXTR protein and Oxtr mRNA in NAc than Low-Oxtr voles.

    “High-Oxtr voles expressed far more OXTR protein (Figure 7a) and Oxtr mRNA (Figure 7e) in NAc than Low-Oxtr voles (Figure 7b,f), as expected.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Natural genetic polymorphisms robustly influenced Oxtr expression in both D1 and D2 receptor cell types in the nucleus accumbens.

    “Furthermore, natural genetic polymorphisms robustly influenced oxytocin receptor expression in both D1 and D2 receptor cell types in the nucleus accumbens.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    There was a main effect of genotype on Oxtr expression in NAc cells, accounting for 70.81% of variation.

    “There was a main effect of genotype (F (1, 20) = 74.20, p < 0.0001) accounting for 70.81% of variation in Oxtr expression (Figure 9), which aligns closely with previous studies (King et al., 2016)(King et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites King et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingown data

    Both the core and shell of the NAc contained high levels of Oxtr mRNA.

    “Both the core and shell of the NAc, a critical reward center, contained high levels of Oxtr mRNA (Figure 2d), as did all regions of the PFC including prelimbic and infralimbic cortex, although strong expression was more prominent in deeper cortical layers, particularly 5 and 6, in the prelimbic cortex (Figure 1,2c).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 49
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 42
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Protein and mRNA expression were closely aligned in most brain regions, but not all.

    “Protein and mRNA expression were closely aligned in most brain regions, but not all.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Oxtr mRNA expression is widespread and diffuse throughout the prairie vole brain, with specific areas displaying particularly robust expression.

    “We found that oxytocin receptor mRNA expression was widespread and diffuse throughout the brain, with specific areas displaying particularly robust expression.”
    • Also stated in: § Brain-wide mapping of Oxtr mRNA · plain
      “Diffuse expression of Oxtr can be seen in numerous regions throughout the brain, with robust expression concentrated in specific regions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Weak genotype-by-sex and genotype-by-cell type interactions were detected, accounting for 4.21% and 0.50% of variation, respectively.

    “Weak genotype-by-sex (F (1, 20) = 4.41, p = 0.0485) and genotype-by-cell type (F (1, 30) = 4.80, p = 0.0405) interactions were also detected, accounting for 4.21% and 0.50% of variation, respectively, in which genotype had slightly larger effects on females than on males and on D2R cells than on D1R cells.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Oxtr mRNA expression in cerebral cortex was relatively diffuse, with certain regions containing moderate-to-high levels, primarily in cortical layers 2, 5, and 6.

    “Oxtr mRNA expression in cerebral cortex was relatively diffuse, with certain regions containing moderate-to-high levels of expression (Figure 1). These signals were primarily located in cortical layers 2, 5, and 6 (Figure 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The BNST, VMH, and paraventricular thalamic nucleus displayed exceptionally strong Oxtr expression, while the medial preoptic area and lateral septum contained more moderate levels.

    “The BNST, VMH, and paraventricular thalamic nucleus displayed exceptionally strong expression, while the medial preoptic area and lateral septum contained more moderate levels of Oxtr mRNA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All regions of the PFC including prelimbic and infralimbic cortex contained Oxtr mRNA, with strong expression more prominent in deeper cortical layers 5 and 6 in the prelimbic cortex.

    “Both the core and shell of the NAc, a critical reward center, contained high levels of Oxtr mRNA (Figure 2d), as did all regions of the PFC including prelimbic and infralimbic cortex, although strong expression was more prominent in deeper cortical layers, particularly 5 and 6, in the prelimbic cortex (Figure 1,2c).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Oxtr mRNA-producing cells were identified in certain hypothalamic areas and related structures including the VMH, lateral septum, medial preoptic area, paraventricular thalamus, paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, and BNST, with more intense signal in the lateral division.

    “Oxtr mRNA-producing cells were identified in certain hypothalamic areas and related structures involved in social and reproductive behavior including the VMH (Figure 3f), lateral septum (Figure 3a), medial preoptic area (Figure 3c), paraventricular thalamus (Figure 3d), paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (Figure 3e), and BNST, with more intense signal in the lateral division (Figure 3b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Oxtr mRNA was detected throughout the amygdala, with particularly dense expression in the central and basolateral regions and the posteromedial cortical amygdala.

    “Oxtr mRNA was detected throughout the amygdala, which processes olfactory information and modulates valence, and expression was particularly dense in the central and basolateral regions (Figure 2e) and the posteromedial cortical amygdala (Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was a main effect of cell type on Oxtr expression, with slightly more Oxtr signal in D2R cells than D1R cells, accounting for 2.18% of variation.

    “although slightly more Oxtr signal was detected in D2R cells than in D1R cells, cell type accounted for just 2.18% of variation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both OXTR protein and Oxtr mRNA were strongly expressed in stratum pyramidale of hippocampal CA2, but even stronger protein labeling in the absence of any mRNA signal was evident immediately superficial and deep to the stratum pyramidale.

    “Both OXTR protein (Figure 6a,b) and Oxtr mRNA (Figure 6c,d) were strongly expressed in stratum pyramidale of hippocampal CA2, but even stronger protein labeling in the absence of any mRNA signal was evident immediately superficial and deep to the stratum pyramidale (Figure 6e,f).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Oxtr mRNA is widely expressed across the prairie vole brain, with enrichment in particular brain regions.

    “Our comprehensive analysis of Oxtr mRNA revealed widespread expression of Oxtr across the brain, with enrichment in particular brain regions, indicating that OXTR signaling may exert more profound modulation of brain function than expected from earlier receptor binding studies.”
    • Also stated in: § Conclusion and future directions · plain
      “Our comprehensive, brain-wide analysis of Oxtr mRNA expression revealed diffuse, widespread distribution throughout the brain as well as robust expression restricted to specific brain regions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Oxtr mRNA was observed in many subregions of the hippocampus, with particularly strong expression in dorsal CA2 and ventral CA1.

    “We observed Oxtr mRNA in many subregions of the hippocampus, but expression was particularly strong in dorsal CA2 and ventral CA1, regions studied extensively for their role in social memory.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In prairie voles, extensive Oxtr labeling was observed in the amygdala, with particularly strong expression in the basolateral and central nuclei.

    “In prairie voles, we observed extensive labeling in the amygdala, with particularly strong expression in the basolateral and central nuclei.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Many cortical areas displayed sparse labeling of Oxtr mRNA, but some, including the anterior cingulate and insular cortices, showed strong labeling in restricted layers, primarily layers two, five, and six.

    “Many cortical areas displayed sparse labeling of Oxtr mRNA, but some, including the anterior cingulate and insular cortices, showed strong labeling in restricted layers, primarily layers two, five, and six.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    High-Oxtr voles had considerable OXTR binding in the SNR, while Low-Oxtr voles showed no detectable binding there.

    “We also observed that High-Oxtr voles had considerable OXTR binding in the SNR, while Low-Oxtr voles showed no detectable binding there.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Oxtr was consistently expressed in the insular cortex and all the nodes of the SDMN.

    “Oxtr was consistently expressed in the insular cortex and all the nodes of the SDMN.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The CA2 region displayed strong expression of both Oxtr mRNA and OXTR protein.

    “The CA2 region displayed strong expression of both Oxtr mRNA and OXTR protein.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In CA2, Oxtr mRNA was restricted to the stratum pyramidale while OXTR protein labeling was evident both superficial and basal to the stratum pyramidale.

    “The mRNA was restricted to the stratum pyramidale while protein labeling was evident both superficial and basal to the stratum pyramidale.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was no significant difference between D1R and D2R cells in Low-Oxtr males or in females of either genotype.

    “There was also a significant difference between D1R and D2R cells in High-Oxtr males (p = 0.0053) with D2R cells expressing slightly more Oxtr, but there was no significant difference between D1R and D2R cells in Low-Oxtr males or in females of either genotype.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Genotype had slightly larger effects on Oxtr expression in females than in males and in D2R cells than in D1R cells.

    “in which genotype had slightly larger effects on females than on males and on D2R cells than on D1R cells.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    OXTRs can be transported to distal neuronal processes, consistent with presynaptic OXTR functions.

    “indicating that oxytocin receptors can be transported to distal neuronal processes, consistent with presynaptic oxytocin receptor functions.”
    • Also stated in: § Mismatch of Oxtr mRNA and OXTR protein · hedged
      “This disparity between the locations of OXTR protein and Oxtr mRNA suggests that OXTRs may be synthesized in the cell body in one location and transported to projections in another, enabling synaptic transmission.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Autoradiography was performed on a small subset of sections from each brain to confirm that genotype predicted NAc OXTR density as expected.

    “Autoradiography was performed on a small subset of sections from each brain to confirm that genotype predicted NAc OXTR density as expected.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Our observations are consistent with previous studies labeling Oxtr mRNA in prairie voles.

    “Our observations are consistent with previous studies labeling Oxtr mRNA in prairie voles, although these earlier efforts analyzed fewer anatomical regions and utilized in situ hybridization techniques that were far less sensitive and had lower resolution than those we employed in the present study (Lim, Murphy, & Young, 2004; L. J. Young et al., 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lim, Murphy, & Young, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites L. J. Young et al., 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Antibodies targeting OXTRs are notorious for producing non-specific labeling.

    “Although Mitre et al.’s labeling in mice is convincing, antibodies targeting OXTRs are notorious for producing non-specific labeling (Yoshida et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yoshida et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Oxytocin is released in response to social stimuli including social touch, visual observation of maternal behavior, infant vocalizations, and interspecies eye contact between humans and dogs.

    “Oxytocin is released in response to a myriad of social stimuli including social touch (Tang et al., 2020), visual observation of maternal behavior (Carcea et al., 2021), infant vocalizations (Valtcheva et al., 2021), and even interspecies eye contact between humans and dogs (Nagasawa et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Tang et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Carcea et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Valtcheva et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The high level of OXTR mRNA expression in human CPu and NAc is consistent with prairie vole, but not mouse or rat brain.

    “Notably, the high level of OTXR mRNA expression in human CPu and NAc is consistent with prairie vole, but not mouse or rat brain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Quintana et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    There has been no comprehensive mapping of Oxtr mRNA expression throughout the vole brain.

    “Despite the value of the prairie vole model for understanding the effects of oxytocin on behavior, there has been no comprehensive mapping of Oxtr mRNA expression throughout the vole brain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Species- and brain region-specific developmental changes in OXTR density have been reported in rodents.

    “It should be noted that species- and brain region-specific developmental changes in OXTR density have been reported in rodents, which our study cannot address since only adult animals were used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Prounis, Thomas, & Ophir, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Smith et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Previous OXTR localization studies in voles relied on autoradiographic detection, which does not provide cellular resolution.

    “Previous OXTR localization studies in voles have relied on autoradiographic detection, which does not provide cellular resolution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Mice show intermediate to high levels of OXTR immunolabeling in the PVN, SON, and SCN.

    “Intermediate to high level of OXTR immunolabeling was detected in the mouse PVN, SON and SCN, whereas only small population of cells expressed Oxtr mRNA in these nuclei of the prairie vole.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mitre et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In prairie voles, SNPs in the OXTR gene Oxtr predict individual differences in OXTR density in the NAc, but not other areas, which, in turn, predicts social attachment behaviors and resilience to early-life neglect.

    “In prairie voles, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the OXTR gene, Oxtr, predict individual differences in OXTR density in the NAc, but not other areas, which, in turn, predicts social attachment behaviors and resilience to early-life neglect (Ahern, Olsen, Tudino, & Beery, 2021; Barrett, Arambula, & Young, 2015; King, Walum, Inoue, Eyrich, & Young, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ahern, Olsen, Tudino, & Beery, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Barrett, Arambula, & Young, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites King, Walum, Inoue, Eyrich, & Young, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Once released, oxytocin can modulate neural network activity by directly depolarizing projection neurons, affecting interneurons that regulate local circuit activity, and modulating other neuromodulator systems like dopamine, acetylcholine, and serotonin.

    “Once released, oxytocin is capable of modulating the activity of neural networks at three levels: i) by directly depolarizing projection neurons, ii) by affecting the activity of interneurons that regulate local circuit activity, and iii) by modulating the activity of other neuromodulator systems like dopamine, acetylcholine, and serotonin (Froemke & Young, 2021; Putnam, Young, & Gothard, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Froemke & Young, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Putnam, Young, & Gothard, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data

    Our study cannot address developmental changes in Oxtr mRNA because only adult animals were used.

    “It should be noted that species- and brain region-specific developmental changes in OXTR density have been reported in rodents, which our study cannot address since only adult animals were used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In prairie voles, OXTR binding increases from juvenile to adulthood in the NAc, CPu, BLA, and PVA, whereas in rats OXTR binding significantly decreases in several of the same regions as they mature.

    “For instance, in the NAc, CPu, BLA and PVA, OXTR binding increases from juvenile to the adulthood in prairie voles, whereas OXTR binding is significantly decreased in several of the same regions as rats mature into adults (Prounis, Thomas, & Ophir, 2018; Smith et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Prounis, Thomas, & Ophir, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Smith et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Only the male High-Oxtr brain was used to generate Supplementary Table 1, though this expression pattern was consistent across the other three brains except for lower expression in genotype-dependent regions such as NAc and CPu of Low-Oxtr voles.

    “Only the male High-Oxtr brain was used to generate Supplementary Table 1, though this expression pattern was consistent across the other three brains except for the lower expression in genotype-dependent regions such as NAc and CPu of Low-Oxtr voles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In humans, Oxtr mRNA expression is widespread and diffuse with isolated regions of high expression including the striatum, thalamus, hypothalamus, hippocampus, amygdala, and olfactory bulbs.

    “In humans, Oxtr mRNA expression appears similarly widespread and diffuse with isolated regions of high expression including the striatum, thalamus, hypothalamus, hippocampus, amygdala, and olfactory bulbs (Bethlehem et al., 2017; Quintana et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bethlehem et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Quintana et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Our findings are generally consistent with protein and mRNA analyses of Oxtr expression patterns in other species.

    “Although species differences exist, our findings are generally consistent with protein and mRNA analyses of Oxtr expression patterns in other species.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Findings from other species about OXTR function in homologous brain regions generalize to prairie voles.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Multi-sensory social information is processed in dorsal CA2, then transmitted to ventral CA1 for social memory storage.

    “Multi-sensory social information is believed to be processed in dorsal CA2, then transmitted to ventral CA1 for social memory storage (Watarai, Tao, Wang, & Okuyama, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Watarai, Tao, Wang, & Okuyama, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Oxytocin-dependent salience of olfactory social cues is enhanced during mating, which facilitates pair bonding.

    “OXTR binding in the prairie vole anterior olfactory area is highly sensitive to estrogen, suggesting that oxytocin-dependent salience of olfactory social cues is enhanced during mating, which facilitates pair bonding (Witt, Carter, & Lnsel, 1991).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Witt, Carter, & Lnsel, 1991

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Oxytocin signaling in the BNST and NAc mediates social vigilance and the regulation of social approach behaviors.

    “Oxytocin signaling in the BNST and NAc mediates social vigilance and the regulation of social approach behaviors (Duque-Wilckens et al., 2020; Williams et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Duque-Wilckens et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Williams et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    OXTR signaling in the anterior olfactory area enhances social recognition in mice by increasing excitatory output to inhibitory granule cell interneurons in the main olfactory bulb.

    “OXTR signaling in the anterior olfactory area enhances social recognition in mice by increasing excitatory output to inhibitory granule cell interneurons in the main olfactory bulb (Oettl et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Oettl et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Prairie voles have high densities of OXTR binding in the basolateral amygdala, whereas mice do not.

    “Interestingly, while prairie voles have high densities of OXTR binding in the basolateral amygdala, mice do not (Larry J. Young & Zhang, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Larry J. Young & Zhang, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In mice, OXTR binding depolarizes CA2 pyramidal cells, regulating short-term plasticity of CA2-to-CA1 synaptic transmission.

    “Indeed, dorsal CA2 provides strong excitatory input to ventral CA1 (Meira et al., 2018) and in mice, OXTR binding depolarizes CA2 pyramidal cells, which regulates the short-term plasticity of CA2-to-CA1 synaptic transmission (Tirko et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tirko et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Oxytocin signaling might be involved in the information processing of the accessory olfactory system and the influence of this system on sociosexual behavior.

    “Thus, oxytocin signaling might be involved in the information processing of the accessory olfactory system and the influence of this system on sociosexual behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The posteromedial cortical amygdaloid nucleus is the only cortical target of the direct projection from the accessory olfactory bulb.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Oxytocin signaling in the medial amygdala is essential for social recognition in mice.

    “Oxytocin signaling in the medial amygdala is also essential for social recognition in mice (Ferguson, Aldag, Insel, & Young, 2001), and in the central amygdala, oxytocin signaling modulates emotion discrimination (Ferretti et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ferguson, Aldag, Insel, & Young, 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    This increased inhibition enhances the signal-to-noise ratio of social olfactory information conveyed via mitral and tufted cell projection neurons from the olfactory bulb to olfactory cortex.

    “This increased inhibition enhances the signal-to-noise ratio of social olfactory information conveyed via mitral and tufted cell projection neurons from the olfactory bulb to olfactory cortex (Oettl et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Oettl et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Ventral CA1 houses social engrams, or memory traces for specific individuals.

    “Ventral CA1 is believed to house social engrams, or memory traces for specific individuals (Okuyama, 2018; Okuyama, Kitamura, Roy, Itohara, & Tonegawa, 2016), and oxytocin signaling in CA1 fast-spiking interneurons enhances signal-to-noise ratio in CA1 pyramidal cells (Owen et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Okuyama, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Okuyama, Kitamura, Roy, Itohara, & Tonegawa, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    OXTRs in CA2 are necessary for discrimination of social stimuli and formation of social recognition memory.

    “Dorsal CA2 and its projections to ventral CA1 are critical for social memory encoding, consolidation, and recall (Meira et al., 2018; Oliva, Fernández-Ruiz, Leroy, & Siegelbaum, 2020), and OXTRs in CA2 are necessary for discrimination of social stimuli and formation of social recognition memory (Lin et al., 2018; Raam, McAvoy, Besnard, Veenema, & Sahay, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lin et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Raam, McAvoy, Besnard, Veenema, & Sahay, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Oxytocin signaling in CA1 fast-spiking interneurons enhances signal-to-noise ratio in CA1 pyramidal cells.

    “Ventral CA1 is believed to house social engrams, or memory traces for specific individuals (Okuyama, 2018; Okuyama, Kitamura, Roy, Itohara, & Tonegawa, 2016), and oxytocin signaling in CA1 fast-spiking interneurons enhances signal-to-noise ratio in CA1 pyramidal cells (Owen et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Owen et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    OXTR binding in hippocampal subfields, particularly dorsal CA2 and ventral CA1, appears to modulate hippocampal network activity and facilitate the flow of social information through the hippocampus, enabling social discrimination and memory.

    “OXTR binding in hippocampal subfields, particularly dorsal CA2 and ventral CA1, therefore appears to modulate hippocampal network activity and facilitate the flow of social information through the hippocampus, thus enabling social discrimination and memory.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    OXTR signaling in the NAc of virgins decreases the amplitude of spontaneous EPSCs, while it increases the amplitude of electrically evoked EPSCs in an endocannabinoid-dependent manner in the NAc of pair-bonded voles.

    “OXTR signaling in the NAc of virgins decreases the amplitude of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs), while it increases the amplitude of electrically evoked EPSCs in an endocannabinoid-dependent manner in the NAc of pair-bonded voles (Borie et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Borie et al., 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In the central amygdala, oxytocin signaling modulates emotion discrimination.

    “Oxytocin signaling in the medial amygdala is also essential for social recognition in mice (Ferguson, Aldag, Insel, & Young, 2001), and in the central amygdala, oxytocin signaling modulates emotion discrimination (Ferretti et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ferretti et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Somatodendritic release of oxytocin in the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei is believed to have local autocrine and paracrine effects with important behavioral consequences.

    “For example, somatodendritic release of oxytocin in the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei is believed to have local autocrine and paracrine effects with important behavioral consequences (Mike Ludwig, Apps, Menzies, Patel, & Rice, 2016; M. Ludwig & Leng, 2006; Modi et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Mike Ludwig, Apps, Menzies, Patel, & Rice, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites M. Ludwig & Leng, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Modi et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The anatomical origins and physiological regulation of oxytocin release in the central nervous system are complicated and not fully understood, but rely on parvocellular projections, magnocellular axon collaterals, and extra-synaptic oxytocin release.

    “The anatomical origins and physiological regulation of oxytocin release in the central nervous system are more complicated and not fully understood, but certainly rely on parvocellular projections, magnocellular axon collaterals, and extra-synaptic oxytocin release (Althammer & Grinevich, 2017; Grinevich & Ludwig, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Althammer & Grinevich, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Grinevich & Ludwig, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Peripheral oxytocin signaling in the vagus nerve can influence feeding and drug self-administration behaviors.

    “Notably, the vagus nerve nucleus showed strong labeling as well, as peripheral oxytocin signaling in the vagus nerve can influence feeding and drug self-administration behaviors (Everett, Turner, Costa, Baracz, & Cornish, 2021; Iwasaki et al., 2015), and therefore could potentially mediate some of the behavioral effects of intranasally administered oxytocin in humans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Everett, Turner, Costa, Baracz, & Cornish, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Iwasaki et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Peripheral oxytocin signaling could potentially mediate some of the behavioral effects of intranasally administered oxytocin in humans.

    “Notably, the vagus nerve nucleus showed strong labeling as well, as peripheral oxytocin signaling in the vagus nerve can influence feeding and drug self-administration behaviors (Everett, Turner, Costa, Baracz, & Cornish, 2021; Iwasaki et al., 2015), and therefore could potentially mediate some of the behavioral effects of intranasally administered oxytocin in humans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A small population of parvocellular neurons in the paraventricular nucleus is selectively activated by social touch, and these cells project to and regulate the activity of magnocellular neurons.

    “Additionally, a recent study found that a small population of parvocellular neurons in the paraventricular nucleus is selectively activated by social touch, and that these cells project to and regulate the activity of magnocellular neurons (Tang et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tang et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Oxtr mRNA in the mouse PAG showed decline from juvenile to adulthood.

    “Oxtr mRNA in the mouse PAG also showed decline from juvenile to adulthood (Daniel E. Olazábal & Alsina-Llanes, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Daniel E. Olazábal & Alsina-Llanes, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Oxtr expression in the rat VTA was decreased during development and only weak expression was detected in the adult.

    “Consistent with our sparse Oxtr labeling in the adult prairie vole VTA, Oxtr expression in the rat VTA was decreased during development and only weak expression was detected in the adult (Yoshimura, Kimura, Watanabe, & Kiyama, 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yoshimura, Kimura, Watanabe, & Kiyama, 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Via their projections into the posterior pituitary, magnocellular neurons are the primary source of oxytocin released as a hormone into peripheral circulation.

    “Via their projections into the posterior pituitary, magnocellular neurons are the primary source of oxytocin released as a hormone into peripheral circulation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Althammer & Grinevich, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Grinevich & Ludwig, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Oxytocin is synthesized and released primarily by the magnocellular and parvocellular neurons of the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei as well as accessory nuclei.

    “Oxytocin is synthesized and released primarily by the magnocellular and parvocellular neurons of the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei as well as accessory nuclei (Althammer & Grinevich, 2017; Grinevich & Ludwig, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Althammer & Grinevich, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Grinevich & Ludwig, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Despite the small proportion of neurons expressing Oxtr, they may be sufficient to trigger functional effects through collateral activation of interconnected magnocellular neurons.

    “Despite the small proportion of neurons expressing Oxtr, they may be sufficient to trigger functional effects through collateral activation of interconnected magnocellular neurons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rats have robust Oxtr expression in the ventrolateral portion of the VMH, and this expression influences sexual behavior and is regulated by estrogen and progesterone.

    “In contrast, rats have robust Oxtr expression in the ventrolateral portion of the VMH, and this expression influences sexual behavior and is regulated by estrogen and progesterone (Bale, Dorsa, & Johnston, 1995; Schumacher, Coirini, Pfaff, & McEwen, 1990).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bale, Dorsa, & Johnston, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schumacher, Coirini, Pfaff, & McEwen, 1990

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    The origin of the OXTR protein signal observed cannot be determined definitively from our images.

    “Although the origin of the OXTR protein signal we observed cannot be determined definitively from our images, it is clear that the proteins reside and act in receptive fields a considerable distance from the somas in which the mRNA resides.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The canonical notion of D1R and D2R MSNs is that they project to the SNR either directly via the monosynaptic direct pathway or indirectly via the multi-synaptic indirect pathway, respectively.

    “Although oversimplified, the canonical notion of D1R and D2R MSNs is that they project to the SNR either directly via the monosynaptic “direct pathway” or indirectly via the multi-synaptic “indirect pathway,” respectively (Calabresi, Picconi, Tozzi, Ghiglieri, & Di Filippo, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Calabresi, Picconi, Tozzi, Ghiglieri, & Di Filippo, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The OXTR protein labeling observed superficial and basal to the stratum pyramidale is plausibly located on the dendritic arbors of pyramidal neurons.

    “It is therefore plausible that the OXTR protein labeling we observed superficial and basal to the stratum pyramidale is located on the dendritic arbors of pyramidal neurons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In mice, CA2 receives afferent projections from the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, and CA2 pyramidal cells express robust levels of OXTRs, which maintain long-term potentiation of synapses with entorhinal cortex projections.

    “Nevertheless, in mice, CA2 receives afferent projections from the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, and CA2 pyramidal cells express robust levels of OXTRs, which maintain the long-term potentiation of synapses with entorhinal cortex projections (Cui, Gerfen, & Young, 2013; Lin et al., 2018; Yoshida et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cui, Gerfen, & Young, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lin et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yoshida et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In humans, the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insular cortex constitute key nodes of a salience network critical for detection of behaviorally relevant stimuli and commonly disrupted in neuropsychiatric conditions.

    “Notably, in humans, the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insular cortex constitute the key nodes of a salience network, which is critical for the detection of behaviorally relevant stimuli and commonly disrupted in neuropsychiatric conditions (Seeley et al., 2007; Uddin, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Seeley et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Uddin, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The genotype-dependent OXTR binding observed in the ventral pallidum of High-Oxtr voles is from OXTR proteins on terminals of axons from NAc.

    “Like the SNR, the ventral pallidum receives strong direct projections from the NAc, and we suspect that the genotype-dependent OXTR binding we observed in the ventral pallidum of High-Oxtr voles is from OXTR proteins on the terminals of axons from NAc.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both D1R and D2R MSNs receive afferent input from a wide range of brain regions.

    “Both D1R and D2R MSNs receive afferent input from a wide range of brain regions (Z. Li et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Z. Li et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In prairie voles, D2R activation facilitates pair bond formation, and either blocking D2Rs or activating D1Rs inhibits pair bond formation.

    “In prairie voles, D2R activation facilitates pair bond formation, and either blocking D2Rs or activating D1Rs inhibits pair bond formation (Aragona et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aragona et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The primary projection neurons of the NAc, GABAergic MSNs, constitute approximately 95% of all neurons in the NAc and can be subdivided into those that express Drd1 and those that express Drd2.

    “The primary projection neurons of the NAc, GABAergic MSNs, constitute approximately 95% of all neurons in the NAc and can be subdivided into those that express Drd1 and those that express Drd2.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The anterior cingulate and insular cortices share reciprocal connectivity, suggesting a mechanism by which OXTRs in these regions could coordinate activity between two distinct cortical areas and thus regulate emotion detection and behavioral responses.

    “The anterior cingulate and insular cortices share reciprocal connectivity, suggesting a mechanism by which OXTRs in these regions could coordinate activity between two distinct cortical areas and thus regulate emotion detection and behavioral responses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A set of SNPs in linkage disequilibrium in the prairie vole Oxtr gene predicts both the animal's ability to form a pair bond and the density of OXTR protein expressed in the NAc, CPu, OB, and anterior olfactory area.

    “We previously identified a set of SNPs in linkage disequilibrium in the prairie vole Oxtr gene that predicts both the animal’s ability to form a pair bond and the density of OXTR protein expressed in the NAc, CPu, OB, and anterior olfactory area (King et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites King et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    OXTR binding patterns have been shown to vary widely between rodent species.

    “It is important to note that OXTR binding patterns have been shown to vary widely between rodent species (Raggenbass, Tribollet, Dubois-Dauphin, & Dreifuss, 1989; Larry J. Young & Zhang, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Raggenbass, Tribollet, Dubois-Dauphin, & Dreifuss, 1989

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Larry J. Young & Zhang, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    OXTRs may act in receptive fields after being transported a considerable distance from somas containing Oxtr mRNA, consistent with both pre- and post-synaptic signaling mechanisms.

    “Furthermore, our comparison of Oxtr mRNA and OXTR protein localization in adjacent slices suggests that OXTRs may act in receptive fields after being transported a considerable distance from somas containing Oxtr mRNA, consistent with both pre- and post-synaptic signaling mechanisms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
76 of 76
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The pattern of Oxtr mRNA expression observed in the four brains used for mapping is representative of the prairie vole brain generally.

    “To map Oxtr mRNA for Fig. 1–7 and Supplementary Table 1, an RNAscope 2.5 High Definition Red Assay (Advanced Cell Diagnostics; Newark, California) was used to perform chromogenic in situ hybridization of Oxtr mRNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions on every ten sections from four brains (one High- and one Low-Oxtr male and one High- and one Low-Oxtr female).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The semi-quantitative binning of cells expressing Oxtr accurately reflects regional expression levels.

    “The number of cells expressing Oxtr were counted and binned into four groups: 1–20 cells (green in Fig. 1, + in Supplementary Table 1), 21–40 cells (yellow in Fig. 1, ++ in Supplementary Table 1), 41–60 cells (orange in Fig. 1, +++ in Supplementary Table 1), and 61 or more cells (red in Fig. 1, ++++ in Supplementary Table 1).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The rat brain atlas can be used to define brain regions in prairie voles.

    “For the semi-quantitative brain-wide assessment of chromogenic RNAscope in situ hybridization, brain regions were defined according to the seventh edition of “The Rat Brain Atlas in Stereotaxic Coordinates” (Paxinos, 2014).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The intensity of Oxtr labeling in selected NAc cells is a valid measure of Oxtr mRNA expression.

    “Each of the selected cells was outlined and the mean gray value for the infrared (Oxtr) channel measured to quantify the level of Oxtr mRNA.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 80 cells randomly selected per region are representative of that region.

    “For each brain region, 80 cells, detected by Hematoxylin staining, were randomly selected and assessed for positive labeling of Oxtr mRNA.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Oxtr mRNA expression in a brain region indicates functional OXTR signaling there.

    “Our comprehensive analysis of Oxtr mRNA revealed widespread expression of Oxtr across the brain, with enrichment in particular brain regions, indicating that OXTR signaling may exert more profound modulation of brain function than expected from earlier receptor binding studies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The posteromedial cortical amygdaloid nucleus is the only cortical target of the direct projection from the accessory olfactory bulb.

    “Very strong Oxtr expression was also observed in the posteromedial cortical amygdaloid nucleus, which is the only cortical target of the direct projection from the accessory olfactory bulb.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from other species about OXTR function in homologous brain regions generalize to prairie voles.

    “Although species differences exist, our findings are generally consistent with protein and mRNA analyses of Oxtr expression patterns in other species.”
8 of 8

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The distribution of OXTR messenger RNA in prairie vole brain is surprisingly widespread, suggesting that oxytocin may modulate essentially brain-wide circuit activity.

    “In addition, the distribution of OXTR messenger RNA in prairie vole brain is surprisingly widespread, suggesting that OXT may modulate essentially brain-wide circuit activity (71).”

Statistics that don’t add up

Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.

  • Inconsistent p-value: F (1, 30) = 4.80, p = .0405

    Minor

    The paper reports p = .0405 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .036. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.

    Reported p = .0405 · recomputed p = .036

1 of 1

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Doesn’t add upF(1, 30) = 4.8reported p = .0405 · recomputed p = .036

    “F (1, 30) = 4.80, p = .0405”

  • ConsistentF(1, 20) = 74.2reported p < .0001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F (1, 20) = 74.20, p < .0001”

  • ConsistentF(1, 20) = 20.9reported p = .0002 · recomputed p < .001

    “F (1, 20) = 20.90, p = .0002”

  • ConsistentF(1, 20) = 4.41reported p = .0485 · recomputed p = .049

    “F (1, 20) = 4.41, p = .0485”

4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Inconsistent ANOVA denominator degrees of freedom

    Minor

    The genotype-by-cell-type interaction is reported with 30 denominator degrees of freedom, while the cell-type effect in the same mixed-model ANOVA uses 20. Both involve the repeated-measures cell-type factor and should use the same denominator degrees of freedom; with 24 animals across four sex-by-genotype groups, that value is 20.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1037//0735‐7044.108.6.1163 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inoue, K., Ford, C. L., Horie, K., & Young, L. J.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Inoue, Kiyoshi
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-06-28
Volume
530
Issue
16
Pages
2881-2900
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W4283709113
Cited by
45
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7
FWCI
8.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P51OD011132)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH112788, P50MH100023)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008169)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
oxytocin receptor, Microtus ochrogaster, social behavior, pair bonding, nucleus accumbens, dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, genetic polymorphism, hippocampus, substantia nigra, social loss
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Arvicolinae, Dopamine, Nucleus Accumbens, Oxytocin, Polymorphism, Genetic, Receptors, Dopamine, RNA, Messenger, Social Behavior, Receptors, Oxytocin, Grassland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review