Cited by 188Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Effects of adult-generated granule cells on coordinated network activity in the dentate gyrus

Open access
Lacefield, Clay O., Itskov, Vladimir, Reardon, Thomas, Hen, René, Gordon, Joshua A.·2012·Hippocampus

Abstract

Throughout the adult life of most mammals, new neurons are continuously generated in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampal formation. Recent work has documented specific cognitive deficits after elimination of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in rodents, suggesting that these neurons may contribute to information processing in hippocampal circuits. Young adult-born neurons exhibit enhanced excitability and have altered capacity for synaptic plasticity in hippocampal slice preparations in vitro. Still, little is known about the effect of adult-born granule cells on hippocampal activity in vivo. To assess the impact of these new neurons on neural circuits in the dentate, we recorded perforant-path evoked responses and spontaneous network activity from the dentate gyrus of urethane-anesthetized mice whose hippocampus had been focally X-irradiated to eliminate the population of young adult-born granule cells. After X-irradiation, perforant-path responses were reduced in magnitude. In contrast, there was a marked increase in the amplitude of spontaneous γ-frequency bursts in the dentate gyrus and hilus, as well as increased synchronization of dentate neuron firing to these bursts. A similar increase in gamma burst amplitude was also found in animals in which adult neurogenesis was eliminated using the GFAP:TK pharmacogenetic ablation technique. These data suggest that young neurons may inhibit or destabilize recurrent network activity in the dentate and hilus. This unexpected result yields a new perspective on how a modest number of young adult-generated granule cells may modulate activity in the larger population of mature granule cells, rather than acting solely as independent encoding units.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.20860

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lacefield, C. O., Itskov, V., Reardon, T., Hen, R., & Gordon, J. A.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hen, René
  • Gordon, Joshua A.
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-29
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
106-116
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
OpenAlex
W2050305231
Cited by
188
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH081968, R01MH068542)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
adult hippocampal neurogenesis, dentate gyrus granule cells, perforant path, hilus, hippocampal circuitry, spontaneous network activity
MeSH terms
Animals, Cytoplasmic Granules, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Dentate Gyrus, Mice, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review