The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 89 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region–Specific Expression and Social Attachment
Open accessAbstract
Background Oxytocin (OXT) modulates several aspects of social behavior. Intranasal OXT is a leading candidate for treating social deficits in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and common genetic variants in the human oxytocin receptor (OXTR) are associated with emotion recognition, relationship quality and ASD. Animal models have revealed that individual differences in Oxtr expression in the brain drive social behavior variation. Our understanding of how genetic variation contributes to brain OXTR expression is very limited. Methods We investigated Oxtr expression in monogamous prairie voles, which have a well characterized OXT system. We quantified brain region-specific levels of Oxtr mRNA and OXTR protein with established neuroanatomical methods. We used pyrosequencing to investigate allelic imbalance of Oxtr mRNA, a molecular signature of polymorphic genetic regulatory elements. We performed next-generation sequencing to discover variants in and near the Oxtr gene. We investigated social attachment using the partner preference test. Results Our allelic imbalance data demonstrates that genetic variants contribute to individual differences in Oxtr expression, but only in particular brain regions, including the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), where OXTR signaling facilitates social attachment. Next-generation sequencing identified one polymorphism in the Oxtr intron, near a putative cis-regulatory element, explaining 74% of the variance in striatal Oxtr expression specifically. Males homozygous for the high expressing allele display enhanced social attachment. Discussion Taken together, these findings provide convincing evidence for robust genetic influence on Oxtr expression and provide novel insights into how non-coding polymorphisms in the OXTR might influence individual differences in human social cognition and behavior
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In prairie voles, non-coding variation in the oxytocin receptor gene predicts brain-region-specific Oxtr expression and OXTR density, especially in the nucleus accumbens. An intronic SNP, NT213739, explains at least 74% of the variance in NAcc OXTR density and is associated with mating-induced partner preference formation in males.
Key findings
- Oxtr allelic imbalance was strongest in striatal regions: in heterozygous voles, the T-allele transcript was 3–5 times more prevalent than the C-allele in NAcc (cDNA ratio 3.16; gDNA threshold 1.11) and CP (cDNA ratio 5.24; gDNA threshold 1.13), with a lesser effect in amygdala (cDNA ratio 1.19; gDNA threshold 1.14).
- Sequencing 70 kb around Oxtr in 45 voles identified 967 SNPs; 15 SNPs in linkage disequilibrium spanning 30 kb were associated with NAcc OXTR density at P=1.06×10−15, adjusted R²=0.78.
- The intronic SNP NT213739 was robustly associated with NAcc OXTR density across independent samples (all P-values <4×10−10; adjusted R²≥74%) and with Oxtr mRNA levels; it was not associated with insular cortex OXTR density.
- In the partner preference test, C/C males spent significantly more time huddling with the partner than the stranger, whereas C/T and T/T males failed to display a partner preference.
Methods
- Prairie voles from a laboratory breeding colony were used for brain-region-specific measures of Oxtr mRNA and OXTR protein via in situ hybridization and autoradiography, with sample sizes including N=31 for autoradiography and N=31 for in situ hybridization.
- Allelic imbalance was assayed by pyrosequencing in animals heterozygous for the 3′UTR SNP NT204321 (minor allele frequency 0.33); next-generation sequencing of 70 kb surrounding Oxtr was performed in 45 voles, followed by genotyping of NT213739 in additional samples (n=35 and n=31).
- Associations between genetic markers and brain data used linear regression with Bonferroni correction, factor analysis for brain-region covariation, and PLINK/SEQ for SNP–autoradiography associations; social attachment was assessed with the partner preference test.
Limitations
- The paper states that the genotype–phenotype relationships do not implicate NT213739 above other SNPs in perfect LD spanning 30 kb, and that larger samples of more genetically diverse animals, including wild-caught specimens, may be needed to break the haplotype structure and identify the functional SNP.
- The paper notes that cross-species comparisons of putative regulatory elements should be interpreted cautiously because transcription factor binding sites may differ between species.
- Evident from the text: the study reports strong associations but does not perform direct functional validation such as ChIP-seq, chromosome conformation capture, or in vitro transcription assays; the behavioral sample size for the partner preference test is not stated in the provided text.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
42 Not checked yet · 26 Own result · 8 Own interpretation · 4 Own method · 1 No basis given
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Amongst the 45 voles we sequenced, we identified 967 SNPs with a read depth no lower than 100 reads, a quality score of at least 1000, and for which all were variable in our sample.”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In heterozygous animals for this SNP, we found significant allelic imbalance in NAcc (cDNA: 3.16, gDNA threshold: 1.11), caudate putamen (CP) (cDNA: 5.24, gDNA threshold: 1.13) and to a lesser degree, amygdala (Amyg) (cDNA: 1.19, gDNA threshold: 1.14).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We performed a second factor analysis in an additional sample (N=85) (Table 1b) and this analysis, like the first one, revealed two factors explaining most of the variance.”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
plainn = 85- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to linkage disequilibrium, 15 SNPs spanning a 30 kb region were associated with NAcc OXTR density with the same, minimal P-value (P=1.06×10−15, adjusted R2=0.78), which is a remarkable effect size for a genotype-phenotype relationship.”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The allelic imbalance was pronounced in the two striatal sub-regions, NAcc and CP, with the T-allele transcript being 3–5 times more prevalent than the C-allele in the same animals in these regions (Figure 1d).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In all of our relatively small samples, NT213739 was strongly associated with NAcc expression (all P-values<4×10−10).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One SNP in the 3’ untranslated region (minor allele frequency 33%), heretofore referred to as NT204321 based on the position of this nucleotide on a sequenced prairie vole bacterial artificial clone (58) (DP001215.2), was identified using this method.”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58] Mouse, 2012, An encyclopedia of mouse DNA elements (Mouse ENCODE), Genome Biol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our analysis revealed two factors together explaining the majority of variance (58%).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
plaincorrelationaln = 31- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As expected based on previous experiments, the NAcc and caudate putamen (CP) exhibited more individual variation in OXTR density than other brain regions (Figure 1a–c).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only one SNP overlapped with strong signatures of transcriptional function, a SNP occurring at nucleotide 213739 (NT213739, minor allele frequency: 0.32) (Figure 3b).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 23
- Probably not a substantial claim. 19
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“OXTR binding in the NAcc was almost perfectly correlated with the first factor and binding in the insular cortex (Ins) was close to perfectly correlated with Factor 2.”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
plaincorrelationaln = 85- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After genotyping additional voles (Sample 2 n=35, Sample 3 n=31) for NT213739, we confirmed the SNP was robustly associated with OXTR density in the NAcc but not in the Ins (Figure 4a).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
boostedcorrelationaln = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Factor 1 strongly reflects co-variability in a set of regions involved in reward processing (NAcc, CP, and olfactory tubercle) while the second factor reflects covariation between cortical and subcortical regions that have relatively uniform levels of OXTR density (Table 1a).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
boostedcorrelationaln = 31- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The effect was marked, such that OXTR density values in the NAcc between homozygous animals of the two genotypes did not overlap at all while heterozygous animals displayed an intermediate phenotype.”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, the effect size of this association was very large in all samples (adjusted R2≥74%), strongly suggesting that NT213739 explains at least 74% of the variance in NAcc expression of OXTR in prairie voles.”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Allelic imbalance is strongest in the striatum and genotype-OXTR associations are most robust in this region.”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > DISCUSSION
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was a significant effect of genotype on partner preference formation, with C/C voles spending significantly more time huddling with the partner than the stranger, while C/T and T/T males failed to display a partner preference (Figure 5).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in noncoding regions of the human OXTR have been associated with pair bonding behaviors (19), parenting (1), face recognition skills (20), and autism (21).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Walum, 2012, Variation in the oxytocin receptor gene is associated with pair-bonding and social behavior, Biol Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [1] Rilling, 2014, The biology of mammalian parenting and its effect on offspring social development, Science source
- Not checked yetcites [20] Skuse, 2014, Common polymorphism in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is associated with human social recognition skills, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“OXTR is distributed throughout the brain of many vertebrates and, importantly, the pattern of OXTR distribution is diverse between species (32, 33).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Donaldson, 2008, Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality, Science source
- Not checked yetcites [33] Freeman, 2014, The neuroanatomical distribution of oxytocin receptor binding and mRNA in the male rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta), Psychoneuroendocrinology source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Some individuals have heterogeneous responses to OXT (22, 23), which may involve interaction with OXTR genetic polymorphisms (24–27).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Bartz, 2011, Social effects of oxytocin in humans: Context and person matter, Trends Cogn Sci
- Not checked yetcites [23] Olff, 2013, The role of oxytocin in social bonding, stress regulation and mental health: An update on the moderating effects of context and interindividual differences, Psychoneuroendocrinology source
- Not checked yetcites [24] Marsh, 2012, The influence of oxytocin administration on responses to infant faces and potential moderation by OXTR genotype, Psychopharmacology source
- Not checked yetcites [25] Montag, 2013, An interaction between oxytocin and a genetic variation of the oxytocin receptor modulates amygdala activity toward direct gaze: Evidence from a pharmacological imaging genetics study, Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci source
- Not checked yetcites [26] Chen, 2015, Genetic modulation of oxytocin sensitivity: A pharmacogenetic approach, Transl Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [27] Feng, 2015, A common oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) polymorphism modulates intranasal oxytocin effects on the neural response to social cooperation in humans, Genes Brain Behav source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“OXTR affects a range of social behaviors in animals including maternal nurturing and bonding (1, 2), social reward and gregariousness (3, 4), social recognition (5), and pair bonding in monogamous species (6–8).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Rilling, 2014, The biology of mammalian parenting and its effect on offspring social development, Science source
- Not checked yetcites [2] Numan, 2016, Neural mechanisms of mother-infant bonding and pair bonding: Similarities, differences, and broader implications, Horm Behav source
- Not checked yetcites [3] Dolen, 2013, Social reward requires coordinated activity of nucleus accumbens oxytocin and serotonin, Nature source
- Not checked yetcites [4] Goodson, 2009, Mesotocin and nonapeptide receptors promote estrildid flocking behavior, Science source
- Not checked yetcites [6] Young, 2004, The neurobiology of pair bonding, Nat Neurosci source
- Not checked yetcites [7] Goodson, 2012, Evolving nonapeptide mechanisms of gregariousness and social diversity in birds, Horm Behav source
- Not checked yetcites [8] Johnson, 2015, Neural networks involved in social attachment and pair bonding, Curr Opin Behav Sci source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Early life stress in humans can interact with OXTR variation to influence adult social behavior and emotional regulation (28–31).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] Loth, 2014, Oxytocin receptor genotype modulates ventral striatal activity to social cues and response to stressful life events, Biol Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [29] Lucas-Thompson, 2013, Environmental stress, oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) polymorphism, and mental health following collective stress, Horm Behav source
- Not checked yetcites [30] Smearman, 2015, Social stress and the oxytocin receptor gene interact to predict antisocial behavior in an at-risk cohort, Dev Psychopathol source
- Not checked yetcites [31] Thompson, 2011, Oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism (rs2254298) interacts with familial risk for psychopathology to predict symptoms of depression and anxiety in adolescent girls, Psychoneuroendocrinology source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“OXTR is often enriched within regions of crucial behavioral circuits such as the mesolimbic reward (MLR) network and social decision making network and appears to modulate these networks to generate species-specific social strategies such as monogamous social attachments (32) and social gregarity (7).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Any differences in mRNA levels between alleles occur in the same nuclear environment, where both alleles should be affected equally by environmental, hormonal or epigenetic factors, unless cis-REs proximal to the alleles are variable.”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Allelic imbalance is commonly observed in a tissue-specific manner (51, 52).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In prairie voles, a microsatellite in the 5’ flanking region of the vasopressin receptor gene (Avpr1a) containing cis-REs has been shown to have functional influence over species differences and individual variation in Avpr1a expression and is associated with variation in social behavior (47, 48).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Donaldson, 2013, The relative contribution of proximal 5′ flanking sequence and microsatellite variation on brain vasopressin 1a receptor (Avpr1a) gene expression and behavior, PLoS Genet source
- Not checked yetcites [48] Johnson, 2005, Polymorphisms affecting gene regulation and mRNA processing: Broad implications for pharmacogenetics, Pharmacol Ther source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Variation in gene expression mediated by cis-REs plays an important role in evolutionary phenotypic change (32, 42–46).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Donaldson, 2008, Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality, Science source
- Not checked yetcites [42] Bendesky, 2011, Genetic contributions to behavioural diversity at the gene-environment interface, Nat Rev Genet source
- Not checked yetcites [43] Linnen, 2013, Adaptive evolution of multiple traits through multiple mutations at a single gene, Science source
- Not checked yetcites [44] Oleksiak, 2002, Variation in gene expression within and among natural populations, Nat Genet source
- Not checked yetcites [45] Cretekos, 2008, Regulatory divergence modifies limb length between mammals, Genes Dev source
- Not checked yetcites [46] Hammock, 2005, Microsatellite instability generates diversity in brain and sociobehavioral traits, Science source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Comparisons of ~1500 bp of 5’ flanking regions from the Oxtr gene reveal only a few SNPs and 99% homology between the species (63).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [63] Young, 1997, The 5′ flanking region of the monogamous prairie vole oxytocin receptor gene directs tissue-specific expression in transgenic mice, Ann N Y Acad Sci source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Amongst the 45 voles we sequenced, we identified 967 SNPs with a read depth no lower than 100 reads, a quality score of at least 1000, and for which all were variable in our sample.”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Transgenic mice carrying a reporter gene driven by 5 kb of the prairie vole Oxtr 5’ flanking sequence express the reporter in the brain in a pattern resembling prairie voles (64), suggesting the sequence may suffice for some aspects of brain region-specific expression.”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [64] Harony-Nicolas, 2014, Brain region-specific methylation in the promoter of the murine oxytocin receptor gene is involved in its expression regulation, Psychoneuroendocrinology source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Polymorphic cis-REs have been shown to influence CTCF binding (71, 72) and DNA looping (73).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [71] Paredes, 2013, Allele-specific transcriptional activity of the variable number of tandem repeats in 5′ region of the DRD4 gene is stimulus specific in human neuronal cells, Genes Brain Behav source
- Not checked yetcites [72] Visser, 2015, Allele-specific transcriptional regulation of IRF4 in melanocytes is mediated by chromatin looping of the intronic rs12203592 enhancer to the IRF4 promoter, Hum Mol Genet source
- Not checked yetcites [73] Dekker, 2013, Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: Interpreting chromatin interaction data, Nat Rev Genet source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“and accumulates rare SNPs in cases of ASD (62).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [62] Young, 1996, Species differences in central oxytocin receptor gene expression: Comparative analysis of promoter sequences, J Neuroendocrinol source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“One role of CTCF is to act as a spatial organizer, aiding DNA looping to permit cis-RE-promoter interactions required for gene transcription (60).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [60] Mizumoto, 1997, A genomic element within the third intron of the human oxytocin receptor gene may be involved in transcriptional suppression, Mol Cell Endocrinol source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together these data suggest that NT213739 is strongly associated with transcriptional variation of the Oxtr gene and tightly linked to a cis-RE.”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > RESULTS
hedgedcorrelationaln = 31- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Interestingly, DNA methylation of OXTR in humans may be mediated by an intronic SNP (67).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [67] Insel, 1993, Gonadal steroids have paradoxical effects on brain oxytocin receptors, J Neuroendocrinol source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this manner cis-REs appear to contribute exquisite control over OXTR and through this process, influence behavioral diversity in prairie voles.”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Prairie voles strongly express OXTR in regions of the MLR, a conserved neural network (75) involved in reward processing and implicated in numerous human psychiatric disorders including depression (76), addiction (77), and schizophrenia (78).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [75] Russo, 2013, The brain reward circuitry in mood disorders, Nat Rev Neurosci source
- Not checked yetcites [76] Luscher, 2011, Drug-evoked synaptic plasticity in addiction: From molecular changes to circuit remodeling, Neuron source
- Not checked yetcites [77] Abi-Dargham, 2014, Schizophrenia: Overview and dopamine dysfunction, J Clin Psychiatry source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Additionally, the human intron may contain other cis-REs (61)”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [61] Liu, 2015, Novel rare variations of the oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene in autism spectrum disorder individuals, Human Genome Variation source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We here demonstrate that genetic variation in the Oxtr exerts robust control over individual diversity in Oxtr expression and OXTR density in the prairie vole brain and that this influence on expression occurs in a region-specific manner.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
“Taken together, these findings provide convincing evidence for robust genetic influence on Oxtr expression”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > DISCUSSION
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
In the paper
“We note that such comparisons should be made with the understanding that transcription factor binding sites may differ between species (70).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [70] Verlaan, 2009, Allele-specific chromatin remodeling in the ZPBP2/GSDMB/ORMDL3 locus associated with the risk of asthma and autoimmune disease, Am J Hum Genet source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the human OXTR third intron, the CTCF peak is found near a SNP, rs237887, that was predicted to be near a cis-RE, and associated with face recognition abilities (20) and ASD diagnosis (21).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Skuse, 2014, Common polymorphism in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is associated with human social recognition skills, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
- Not checked yetcites [21] LoParo, 2015, The oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is associated with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis, Mol Psychiatry source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, testosterone increases OXTR in the hypothalamus of rats but decreases OXTR in mice (68, 69).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [68] Bale, 1995, Regulation of oxytocin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in the ventromedial hypothalamus by testosterone and its metabolites, Endocrinology source
- Not checked yetcites [69] Odom, 2007, Tissue-specific transcriptional regulation has diverged significantly between human and mouse, Nat Genet source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Regarding the factor analyses, to determine how many factors to extract we used the “nFactors” package in R and the factor extraction decisions were based on the eigenvalues-greater-than-one rule, parallel analysis, the optimal coordinates method and acceleration factor.”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > MATERIALS AND METHODS > Statistical analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“DNA methylation of Oxtr differs between brain regions in rodents (65, 66).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] Beery, 2016, Natural variation in maternal care and cross-tissue patterns of oxytocin receptor gene methylation in rats, Horm Behav source
- Not checked yetcites [66] Reiner, 2015, Methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene in clinically depressed patients compared to controls: The role of OXTR rs53576 genotype, J Psychiatr Res source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Associations between genetic information and brain data were examined using linear regression with Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons.”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > MATERIALS AND METHODS > Statistical analysis
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“and others have reported associations with endophenotypes of ASD (20, 82, 83), including structural variability in brain regions relevant to social cognition (80, 84).”
§ Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region Specific Expression and Social Attachment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Skuse, 2014, Common polymorphism in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is associated with human social recognition skills, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
- Not checked yetcites [82] Lerer, 2008, Association between the oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene and autism: Relationship to Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales and cognition, Mol Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [83] Inoue, 2010, Association between the oxytocin receptor gene and amygdalar volume in healthy adults, Biol Psychiatry source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
The neural mechanisms by which non-coding SNPs in OXTR influence behavior have not yet been explored.
“Despite these many associations with human social behavior and disorders, the neural mechanisms by which non-coding SNPs in the OXTR could influence behaviors has yet to be explored.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Correlations between OXTR densities across brain regions can be explained by unobserved latent variables, possibly reflecting transcriptional processes.
“We hypothesize that correlations between OXTR densities from different brain regions can be explained by unobserved variables, possibly reflecting transcriptional processes giving rise to the patterns of correlation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Mouse ENCODE signatures of transcriptional activity in the Oxtr region indicate homologous cis-regulatory elements in prairie vole.
“we investigated their homology with regions of the mouse Oxtr gene that overlap with signatures of functional activity occurring within neural tissues where OXTR is expressed in the mouse (59).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Candidate gene polymorphisms usually explain only 1–10% of behavioral phenotype variance in behavioral genetic studies.
“Behavioral genetic studies typically report that 1–10% of the variance in behavioral phenotype is explained by candidate gene polymorphisms.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
OXTR density lies closer to genotype than behavior does in biological terms.
“We presume that OXTR density is biologically more proximate to genotype than behavior”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Behavioral genetic studies usually involve many additional contributors to behavioral variation.
“and in typical behavioral genetic studies many more variables are contributing to behavioral variation.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These genetic variations may also influence social behavior, as male C/C prairie voles display enhanced social attachment as compared to C/T and T/T animals [71].”
From The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [71]
In the citing paper
“it is well known from non-human animal work that the striatum and regions within the midbrain are highly populated with oxytocin receptors.44, 45”
From Intranasal oxytocin enhances intrinsic corticostriatal functional connectivity in women (2017) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, individual differences in the density of OXTR in the NAcc in prairie voles have now been shown to be mediated by a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in a regulatory region of the OXTR gene (22)”
From Comparative Perspectives on Oxytocin and Vasopressin Receptor Research in Rodents and Primates: Translational Implications (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“and individuals with high NAcc OXTR show enhanced social attachment (22)”
From Comparative Perspectives on Oxytocin and Vasopressin Receptor Research in Rodents and Primates: Translational Implications (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“However, it is important to note that OXTR polymorphisms in the prairie vole robustly predict individual differences in OTR density in the NAc as well as pair bonding behavior (King et al., 2016).”
From Oxytocin receptors modulate a social salience neural network in male prairie voles (2017) · cites this paper as King et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Finally, site-specific OTR blockade does not likely reflect natural intra- and interspecific variation in levels of region-specific OTR expression and signaling (King et al., 2016).”
From Oxytocin receptors modulate a social salience neural network in male prairie voles (2017) · cites this paper as King et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Partner preference formation in male prairie voles is predicted by a natural genetic polymorphism in the OTR gene (Oxtr) that robustly influences the density of OTR binding in the NAc”
From Oxytocin and Social Relationships: From Attachment to Bond Disruption (2017) · cites this paper as King et al. 2016
In the citing paper
“Our results in prairie voles reveal that OTR density in the striatum, which is robustly predicted by polymorphisms in the OTR gene (King et al. 2016), is indicative of resilience to early-life social isolation with respect to later life bonding.”
From Oxytocin and Social Relationships: From Attachment to Bond Disruption (2017) · cites this paper as King et al. 2016
In the citing paper
“This variation in OXTR density in the NAcc is determined by genetic variation in the Oxtr gene (144), which in turn predicts how early-life nurturing experience affects laterlife bonding ability (143).”
From Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and Social Behavior: From Neural Circuits to Clinical Opportunities (2022) · cites this paper as [144]
In the citing paper
“In prairie voles, for instance, such sequence variation determines individual variation in striatal oxytocin receptor density [12]”
From Translational opportunities for circuit-based social neuroscience: advancing 21st century psychiatry (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“This variation in brain receptor distribution is determined by sequence variation in the receptor genes [12,13].”
From Translational opportunities for circuit-based social neuroscience: advancing 21st century psychiatry (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“Importantly, our group has recently demonstrated that the density of OTR variability between individuals within the prairie vole species in the ventral striatum is the result of gene polymorphisms in the OTR gene (King et al. 2016).”
From A precision medicine approach to oxytocin trials (2017) · cites this paper as King et al. 2016
Citations
Cites
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607
The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data
McKenna, A., Hanna, M., Banks, E., Sivachenko, A., Cibulskis, K., Kernytsky, A., Garimella, K., Altshuler, D., Gabriel, S., Daly, M., et al. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.107524.110 · Cited by 27,895 · cited 1×
“2) (53), including marking duplicate reads and local realignment around insertions/deletions.”
The variant call format and VCFtools
Danecek, P., Auton, A., Abecasis, G. R., Albers, C. A., Banks, E., DePristo, M. A., Handsaker, R. E., Lunter, G. A., Marth, G., Sherry, S. T., et al. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330 · Cited by 16,450
The brain reward circuitry in mood disorders
Russo, S. J., & Nestler, E. J. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3381 · Cited by 1,870 · cited 1×
“Prairie voles strongly express OXTR in regions of the MLR, a conserved neural network (74) involved in reward processing and implicated in numerous human psychiatric disorders, including depression (75), addiction (76), and schizophrenia (77).”
Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality
Donaldson, Z. R., & Young, L. J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158668 · Cited by 1,645 · cited 2×
“The OXTR is distributed throughout the brain of many vertebrates, and the pattern of OXTR distribution is diverse among species (32,33).”
Self-citationSocial effects of oxytocin in humans: context and person matter
Bartz, J. A., Zaki, J., Bolger, N., & Ochsner, K. N. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.002 · Cited by 1,581 · cited 1×
“Some individuals have heterogeneous responses to OXT (22,23), which may involve interaction with OXTR genetic polymorphisms (24–27).”
The neurobiology of pair bonding.
Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1327 · Cited by 1,523 · cited 2×
“The OXTR density is much higher in the NAc of prairie voles than promiscuous vole species, and OXTR signaling in the NAc is required for mating-induced partner preference formation, a laboratory proxy of pair bonding (6).”
Cis-regulatory elements: Molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence
Wittkopp, P. J., & Kalay, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3095 · Cited by 1,231 · cited 1×
“Variation in gene expression mediated by cis-REs plays an important role in evolutionary phenotypic change (32, 42-46).”
Social reward requires coordinated activity of nucleus accumbens oxytocin and serotonin
Dölen, G., Darvishzadeh, A., Huang, K. W., & Malenka, R. C. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12518 · Cited by 1,161
Drug-evoked synaptic plasticity in addiction: from molecular changes to circuit remodeling
Lüscher, C., & Malenka, R. C. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.017 · Cited by 1,105 · cited 1×
“Prairie voles strongly express OXTR in regions of the MLR, a conserved neural network (74) involved in reward processing and implicated in numerous human psychiatric disorders, including depression (75), addiction (76), and schizophrenia (77).”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–197 of 197
Specificity in sociogenomics: Identifying causal relationships between genes and behavior
Ortiz, J. R., & Tollkühn, J. (2020) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2020.104882 · Cited by 13
Lauby, S. C., Fleming, A. S., & McGowan, P. O. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.04.021 · Cited by 14
Tsingotjidou, A. (2022) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom12111603 · Cited by 18
“Parvocellular PVN (pPVN) axonal discharge, however, is also communicated to different brain areas: the amygdala, nucleus accumbens (nAcc), dorsal vagal complex in the caudal brainstem and to the spinal cord [45,48,49].”
BackgroundCheng, X., Cao, H., Zhang, F., & Cheadle, C. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Medicine · doi:10.3892/ijmm.2018.3845 · Cited by 12
“Increased and decreased gene expression levels/activities have been observed (14-16).”
Gonzalez, M. Z., Puglia, M. H., Morris, J. P., & Connelly, J. J. (2017) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2017.1403954 · Cited by 10
The neural circuits of monogamous behavior
López-Gutiérrez, M. F., Mejía-Chávez, S., Alcauter, S., & Portillo, W. (2022) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2022.978344 · Cited by 12
“the NAcc (Ophir et al., 2012; King et al., 2016), OTR density in the insula predicted mating success, and OTR density in the hippocampal region predicted patterns of socio-spatial memory (Ophir et al.”
BackgroundManjila, S. B., Betty, R., & Kim, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.1044736 · Cited by 12
“There were reports suggesting changes in OxtR levels leading to pair bonding in prairie voles (Ophir et al., 2012; King et al., 2016).”
BackgroundHazani, R., Breton, J., Trachtenberg, E., Ruzal, K., Shvalbo, B. B., Kantor, B., Maman, A., Bigelman, E., Cole, S. W., Weller, A., et al. (2025) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0845-24.2025 · Cited by 14
“…the NAc of opener rats relative to nonopeners, in line with evidence for the role of NAc Oxtr in social approach (Yu et al., 2016; Williams et al., 2020), a ffi liative behavior (Ross and Young, 2009; Burkett et al., 2016; King et al., 2016), and social reward (Dölen et al., 2013; Hung et al., 2017).”
Horie, K., Blumenthal, S. A., Inoue, K., Yada, S., Nishimori, K., & Young, L. J. (2025) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2025.105708 · Cited by 8
Self-citationSmith, A. L., Walum, H., Connor‐Stroud, F., Freeman, S. M., Inoue, K., Parr, L. A., Goodman, M. M., & Young, L. J. (2016) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2016.10.035 · Cited by 9
Self-citationSeparation from a bonded partner alters neural response to inflammatory pain in monogamous rodents
Okuda, T., Osako, Y., Hidaka, C., Nishihara, M., Young, L. J., Mitsui, S., & Yuri, K. (2022) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113650 · Cited by 7
Self-citationHormonal Underpinnings of Emotional Regulation: Bridging Endocrinology and Psychology
Yılmazer, E. (2024) · üha · doi:10.32739/uha.jnbs.11.1539123 · Cited by 16
Lauby, S. C., Ashbrook, D. G., Malik, H. R., Chatterjee, D., Pan, P., Fleming, A. S., & McGowan, P. O. (2021) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.2069 · Cited by 8
“Previous work suggests that genetic variants in Oxtr can affect infant attachment in humans (Chen et al., 2011) and later- life social attachment in prairie voles with brain regionspecific effects on Oxtr expression (King et al., 2016).”
BackgroundLee, Y.-J., Lin, H., Chaudhary, M. A., Lee, Y., & Wang, D. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22189847 · Cited by 8
“The expression of OTR is determined by not only heritable genetic variation but also by epigenetic modification of the oxytocin receptor gene (human: OXTR; rodent: Oxtr) [14,15].”
BackgroundMethylation of OXT and OXTR genes, central oxytocin, and social behavior in female macaques
Leon, D. D., Nishitani, S., Walum, H., McCormack, K. M., Wilson, M. E., Smith, A. K., Young, L. J., & Sánchez, M. M. (2020) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2020.104856 · Cited by 7
“Indeed, in the sociallymonogamous prairie vole, for example, a single OXTR SNP within a putative cis-regulatory element robustly predicted more than 70% of variability in OXTR expression within brain areas critical for social reward (King et al., 2016), demonstrating that a single variant in this gene may have profoun…”
BackgroundSelf-citationDifferentiated Approach to Pharmacotherapy of Autism Spectrum Disorders: Biochemical Aspects
Бокша, И. С., Prokhorova, T. A., Терешкина, Е. Б., Savushkina, O. K., & Burbaeva, G. S. (2023) · Biochemistry (Moscow) · doi:10.1134/s0006297923030021 · Cited by 6
“The expression level of OTR is a critical factor, which determines response to OT in the brain and immediately affects behavioral reactions and social features [53].”
BackgroundQuantification of surface-localized and total oxytocin receptor in myometrial smooth muscle cells
Fang, Y., Reinl, E. L., Liu, A., Prochaska, T., Malik, M., Frolova, A. I., England, S. K., & Imoukhuede, P. I. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25761 · Cited by 5
“Two hypothetical explanations for the decreased OXTR availability in oxytocin-nonresponsive individuals are genetic variation [6] and hormone dysregulation [7].”
BackgroundBorie, A. M., Dromard, Y., Chakraborty, P., Fontanaud, P., André, E. M., François, A., Colson, P. H., Muscatelli, F., Guillon, G., Desarménien, M. G., et al. (2024) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101781 · Cited by 6
Lee, M., Lori, A., Langford, N. A., & Rilling, J. K. (2022) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105869 · Cited by 6
Brain-wide connectivity and novelty response of the dorsal endopiriform nucleus in mice
Manjila, S. B., Son, S., Parmaksiz, D., Kline, H. L., Betty, R., Wu, Y.-T., Pi, H.-J., Shin, D., Liwang, J. K., Kronman, F. N., et al. (2025) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115827 · Cited by 8
“18,34 Previously, Oxtr expression has been reported in the CLA complex across species, including rodents 34,77 and primates such as rhesus macaques.”
Improving the precision of intranasal oxytocin researchPreprint
Winterton, A., Westlye, L. T., Steen, N. E., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/gz5jb · Cited by 5
Oxytocin receptor controls promiscuity and development in prairie volesPreprint
Sharma, R., Berendzen, K. M., Everitt, A., Wang, B., Williams, G., Wang, S., Quine, K., Larios, R., Long, K. L. P., Hoglen, N. E. G., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.09.25.613753 · Cited by 5
DelaCuesta-Barrutia, J., Hidema, S., Caldwell, H. K., Nishimori, K., Erdozain, A. M., & Peñagarikano, O. (2024) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.03.028 · Cited by 4
Kelberman, M. A., Winther, K. E., Medvedeva, Y. M., & Donaldson, Z. R. (2024) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2024.105647 · Cited by 4
Horie, K., & Nishimori, K. (2021) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1759-5_9 · Cited by 4
Loth, M. K., Schmidt, J. C., Gonzalez, C. A., Brusman, L. E., Sadino, J. M., Winther, K. E., Protter, D. S. W., & Donaldson, Z. R. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-06367-1 · Cited by 8
Ahern, T. H., Ophir, A. G., & Burn, D. (2019) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103961 · Cited by 4
Helping Behavior in Prairie Voles: A Model of Empathy and the Importance of OxytocinPreprint
Kitano, K., Yamagishi, A., Horie, K., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.10.20.347872 · Cited by 4
Boender, A. J., Johnson, Z. V., Green, K. K., Gruenhagen, G. W., Hegarty, B. E., Horie, K., Inoue, K., Schmidt, E. R. E., Streelman, J. T., Walum, H., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.10.26.564214 · Cited by 5
“This previously enabled us to identify a set of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the prairie vole Oxtr gene locus that strongly predicts individual OXTR density in the NAC ( R 2 >0.7), but not in other brain regions 21 .”
InfluentialSelf-citationHazani, R., Breton, J., Trachtenberg, E., Kantor, B., Maman, A., Bigelman, E., Cole, S. W., Weller, A., & Bartal, I. B.-A. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.05.06.592793 · Cited by 4
Oxytocin receptor controls promiscuity and development in prairie volesPreprint
Sharma, R., Berendzen, K. M., Everitt, A., Wang, B., Williams, G., Wang, S., Quine, K., Larios, R., Long, K. L. P., Hoglen, N. E. G., et al. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.104889.1 · Cited by 5
Oxytocin and Dopamine Receptor Expression: Cellular Level Implications for Pair BondingPreprint
Loth, M. K., Schmidt, J. C., Gonzalez, C. A., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.03.03.640889 · Cited by 4
Interaction Between Oxytocin and Dopamine Signaling: Focus on the Striatum
Guidolin, D., Tortorella, C., Cervetto, C., Marcoli, M., Maura, G., & Agnati, L. F. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26178711 · Cited by 3
Olfactory conditioned same-sex partner preference in female rats: Role of ovarian hormones
Tecamachaltzi-Silvarán, M. B., Barradas‐Moctezuma, M., Herrera‐Covarrubias, D., Carrillo, P., Corona-Morales, A. A., Perez, C. A., García, L. I., Manzo, J. G., & Coria‐Ávila, G. A. (2017) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.08.006 · Cited by 4
“In addition, the synergism with other neurochemicals released during olfactory stimulation or VCS (i.e. OT) may facilitate social recognition, and increase the incentive value of social contacts (Ferguson et al., 2001; King et al., 2016).”
BackgroundWu, W. (2023) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.107645 · Cited by 3
Johnson, M., Zweig, J. A., Zhang, Y., Nunez, L., Ryabinina, O. P., Hibert, M., & Ryabinin, A. E. (2024) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-024-02993-x · Cited by 3
Rigney, N., Horie, K., Guo, J., Blumenthal, S. A., Johnson, Z. V., & Young, L. J. (2025) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2025.105726 · Cited by 2
Self-citationAndari, E. (2015) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.11.014 · Cited by 3
Israel, S. (2016) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.05.008 · Cited by 3
Gene expression correlates of social evolution in coral reef butterflyfishes
Nowicki, J. P., Pratchett, M. S., Walker, S. P. W., Coker, D. J., & O’Connell, L. A. (2020) · ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) · Cited by 3
Brain functional connectivity modulates social bonding in monogamous volesPreprint
López-Gutiérrez, M. F., Gracia-Tabuenca, Z., Ortiz, J. J., Camacho, F., Young, L. J., Paredes, R. G., Díaz, N. F., Portillo, W., & Alcauter, S. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/752345 · Cited by 3
“receptor density in the NAcc relates to partner preference in prairie voles (King et al., 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationSocial selectivity and social motivation in volesPreprint
Beery, A. K., Lopez, S. A., Blandino, K. L., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.07.30.454556 · Cited by 3
Sex differences in the reward value of familiar mates in prairie volesPreprint
Vahaba, D. M., Halstead, E. R., Donaldson, Z. R., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.01.458610 · Cited by 3
Long, K. L. P., Hoglen, N. E. G., Keip, A. J., Klinkel, R. M., See, D. L., Maa, J., Wong, J. C., Sherman, M., & Manoli, D. S. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.06.23.599940 · Cited by 3
Pandamooz, S., Salehi, M. S., Jurek, B., Meinung, C.-P., Azarpira, N., Dianatpour, M., & Neumann, I. D. (2023) · Stem Cell Reviews and Reports · doi:10.1007/s12015-023-10603-4 · Cited by 2
“Translational animal models, including prairie voles [31, 32] and multiple mouse models of ASD [33–35] have been developed to expand our knowledge about contributions of the oxytocinergic system to ASD, GAD, and schizophrenia.”
Ghamari, R., Tahmaseb, M., Sarabi‐Jamab, A., Etesami, S.-A., Mohammadzadeh, A., Alizadeh, F., & Tehrani‐Doost, M. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-023-05461-w · Cited by 2
“According to the results of this study, there are several non-coding polymorphisms in the OXTR regulatory and intronic regions that are associated with altered OXTR expression in the NAcc [52].”
ResultJoseph, S. K., Wagman, E. K., Diab, N., Ryu, N., Lee, M., Haas, R., Rilling, J. K., Aldenderfer, M. S., & Lindo, J. (2024) · Genes Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1111/gbb.12877 · Cited by 2
“61 During the subsequent Late Horizon 0.5 – 0.4 ka (1450 – 1533 CE), violence rates subsided as the Inca Empire expanded from the north into the Titicaca Basin partially incorporating the region's Indigenous Aymara communities — the likely descendants of the Tiwanaku and Pukara populations 76 —…”
BackgroundInfluentialSpecialized Networks for Social Cognition: A Defining Role for the Oxytocin Receptor
King, L. B. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1446-16.2016 · Cited by 3
“Prairie vole pair-bonding requires OXTR activation in the nucleus accumbens, and higher individual levels of OXTR in this region facilitate prairie vole bonding (Ross et al., 2009b; Keebaugh et al., 2015; King et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationNuman, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.003.0008 · Cited by 2
Hormonal Control of Maternal Behavior in Nonhuman Mammals
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.003.0003 · Cited by 2
Oxytocin receptor controls promiscuity and development in prairie volesPreprint
Sharma, R., Berendzen, K. M., Everitt, A., Wang, B., Williams, G., Wang, S., Quine, K., Larios, R., Long, K. L. P., Hoglen, N. E. G., et al. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.104889 · Cited by 3
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.003.0002 · Cited by 1
OXTR Gene Polymorphisms and Event-Related Potentials in Humans: A Systematic Review
Rodríguez, D. A. L., Becerra, J., Mera, J. C. C., Cárdenas, F. P., Cotrina, J. A. M., & Aponte-Canencio, D. M. (2024) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.112631 · Cited by 1
Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and Sex Differences in Social Behavior. It’s Complicated!
Veney, S. L., & Caldwell, H. K. (2024) · Masterclass in neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-51112-7_5 · Cited by 1
Social Processes in Animals: Individual Differences in Affiliative Capacity
Brown, J., & Hammock, E. A. D. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-77967-1_11 · Cited by 1
King, L. B., Walum, H., Xiao, Y., Caslin, A. Y., Haddad, F. C., Young, L. J., & Johnson, Z. V. (2025) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2025.105761 · Cited by 1
Self-citationNuman, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.003.0001 · Cited by 1
Central Neural Circuits Regulating Maternal Behavior in Nonhuman Mammals
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.003.0005 · Cited by 1
Alloparental Behavior and Paternal Behavior in Nonhuman Mammals
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.003.0007 · Cited by 1
Intranasal oxytocin enhances intrinsic corticostriatal functional connectivity in womenPreprint
Bethlehem, R. A. I., Lombardo, M. V., Lai, M.-C., Auyeung, B., Crockford, S. K., Deakin, J., Soubramanian, S., Sule, A., Kundu, P., Voon, V., et al. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/068585 · Cited by 7
The Socially Monogamous Prairie Vole: a Rodent Model for Behavioral Neuroendocrine Research
Donovan, M. L., Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119391128.ch8 · Cited by 1
Nowicki, J. P., Pratchett, M. S., Walker, S. P. W., Coker, D. J., & O’Connell, L. A. (2017) · King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) · doi:10.1101/214759 · Cited by 1
Social experience alters oxytocinergic modulation in the nucleus accumbens of female prairie volesPreprint
Borie, A. M., Agezo, S., Lunsford, P., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.07.06.451323 · Cited by 1
Self-citationHelping Behavior in Prairie Voles: A Model of Empathy and the Importance of OxytocinPreprint
Kitano, K., Yamagishi, A., Horie, K., et al. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3919946 · Cited by 1
Natural variation in the oxytocin receptor gene predicts social observation in female prairie volesPreprint
Lee, S. L. T., Cao, X. M., Agezo, S., Boender, A. J., Bowen, C., Johnson, Z. V., Young, L. J., Berman, G. J., & Liu, R. C. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.11.03.686389 · Cited by 1
“…example, an intronic Oxtr single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP NT213739) in male prairie voles strongly associates with social attachment differences and brain region-specific variation in OXTR levels [8], including in the NAc, which has been causally related to the emergence of a pair bond [9–11].”
InfluentialSelf-citationYoung, L. J., & Zingg, H. H. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803592-4.00056-0
Self-citationLönn, E. (2017) · Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä)
Tible, O. (2018) · Archives in Neurology & Neuroscience · doi:10.33552/ann.2018.01.000523
Leon, D. D., Walum, H., McCormack, K. M., LaPrairie, J. L., Lindell, S. G., Firesryche, A., Johnson, Z., Wilson, M. E., Barr, C. S., Sánchez, M. M., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/813287
Self-citationEvolutionary Perspectives on the Parental Brain
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.003.0011
Anxiety Reduction and Maternal Aggression in Postpartum Nonhuman Mammals
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.003.0006
Development of the Parental Brain in Nonhuman Mammals
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.003.0009
Development of the Parental Brain in Humans
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.003.0010
Brain Mechanisms Regulating Maternal Behavior in Nonhuman Mammals
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.003.0004
Sullivan, G. A. (2021) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska)
The Oxytocin System: Single Gene Effects on Social Behavior Across Species
Temple, J. A., & Donaldson, Z. R. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809633-8.90056-6 · Cited by 1
Exclusivity and Pair-Bonding Among Non-humans
Walum, H., & Young, L. J. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3404-1
Self-citationNeuroendocrinology of Social/Affiliative Behaviors☆
Young, L. J. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.02241-0
Self-citationExclusivity and Pair-Bonding Among Non-humans
Walum, H., & Young, L. J. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_3404
Self-citationLee, M., Lori, A., Langford, N. A., & Rilling, J. K. (2022) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2022.114144 · Cited by 1
Comment, au fil du temps, l’ocytocine est devenue l’hormone de l’attachement
Freund‐Mercier, M. J. (2022) · Biologie Aujourd hui · doi:10.1051/jbio/2022014
Ghamari, R., Tahmaseb, M., Sarabi‐Jamab, A., et al. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3006245/v1
Differentiated approach to the pharmacotherapy of autism spectrum disorders: biochemical aspects
Бокша, И. С., Prokhorova, T. A., Savushkina, O. K., Терешкина, Е. Б., & Burbaeva, G. S. (2023) · Biochemistry (Moscow) · doi:10.31857/s0320972523030028
Ryabinin, A. E., Johnson, M., Zweig, J. A., et al. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4351761/v1
Kelberman, M. A., Winther, K. E., Medvedeva, Y. M., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.05.17.594752
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.002.0006
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.002.0003
Abbreviations Used for Major Brain Regions
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.002.0007
Numan, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190848675.002.0004
Хрущова, А. М., Vasilieva, N. Y., & Rogovin, K. A. (2024) · Журнал общей биологии · doi:10.31857/s0044459624050014
Beery, A. K., Lee, N. S., & Cooke, E. M. (2025) · Developmental Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/dneu.23005 · Cited by 1
“Genetic variations in the Oxtr gene are associated with individual differences in receptor expression and social behaviors in prairie voles (King et al. 2016; Ahern et al. 2021; Vahaba et al. 2022) and with social behaviors in humans (Rodrigues et al. 2009; Kogan et al. 2011; Chander et al. 2022).”
Advancing insights into the neuroendocrine basis of socio-sexual interactions in mammals
Masoumparast, M., Fiset, J.-P., Nasri, N., & Silva, M. S. B. (2026) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/endocr/bqag036
New regulators in oxytocin and vasopressin release : role of the endolysosomal two-pore channels
Martucci, L. L. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/027d1ae2zd2ebz4677za019ze6ccd94cafe9
Ma, X., Wang, M., Yang, J., Li, G., Wang, Y., Fang, H., & Zhang, S. (2026) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-025-09749-y
“This imbalance in gene expression could lead to overactivation, an important pathological mechanism in many neurodegenerative disorders, and may be a driving factor in the cognitive decline associated with DS ((Berto et al., 2022, King et al., 2016).”
Tsukamoto, M., Nagai, L. A., Inoue, K., Kandasamy, L. C., Pires, M. F., Shin, M., Nagasawa, Y., Sambuu, T., Nakai, K., Itohara, S., et al. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.109080.1
Self-citationTsukamoto, M., Nagai, L. A., Inoue, K., Kandasamy, L. C., Pires, M. F., Shin, M., Nagasawa, Y., Sambuu, T., Nakai, K., Itohara, S., et al. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.109080
Self-citationZheng, S., Prounis, G. S., & Ophir, A. G. (2026) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2026.1772423
Metadata
- Authors
- King, L. B., Walum, H., Inoue, K., Eyrich, N. W., & Young, L. J.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Young, Larry J.
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 160-169
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4909578
- OpenAlex
- W2216755319
- Semantic Scholar
- 01a573b667c990664ff2f484a535ecfac25237b4
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19
- FWCI
- 32.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R01MH096983, 1P50MH100023, 5T32GM008605, 5T32DA015040)
- National Institutes of Health Office of Research Infrastructure Programs/OD (P51OD11132)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Keywords
- oxytocin receptor gene, oxytocin receptor, Microtus ochrogaster, social attachment, brain region-specific gene expression, allelic imbalance, cis-regulatory elements, intronic polymorphism, nucleus accumbens, striatum, mate preferences, monogamy, genetic regulation of gene expression, autism spectrum disorder
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Alleles, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Arvicolinae, Individuality, Nucleus Accumbens, Object Attachment, Polymorphism, Genetic, RNA, Messenger, Social Behavior, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Receptors, Oxytocin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review