Cited by 720Sleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related FatigueObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 273 of the 293 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 242 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Sleep, Health, and Society

Open access
Grandner, Michael A.·2017·Sleep Medicine Clinics

Abstract

Biological needs for sleep are met by engaging in behaviors that are largely influenced by the environment, social norms and demands, and societal influences and pressures. Insufficient sleep duration and sleep disorders such as insomnia and sleep apnea are highly prevalent in the US population. This article outlines some of these downstream factors, including cardiovascular and metabolic disease risk, neurocognitive dysfunction, and mortality, as well as societal factors such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomics. This review also discusses societal factors related to sleep, such as globalization, health disparities, public policy, public safety, and changing patterns of use of technology.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that sleep is a biological requirement shaped by social, environmental, and societal forces, and that insufficient sleep is linked to broad health harms. It synthesizes population prevalence, health outcome evidence, and social-ecological/behavioral models to frame sleep as a public health and policy issue.

Key findings

  • Population estimates show substantial short sleep: in NHANES 2007–2008, 6.2% reported <5 hours, 33.78% 5–6 hours, 52.68% 7–8 hours, and 7.38% ≥9 hours per typical weeknight; in 2014 BRFSS (444,306 adults), median prevalence of <7 hours was 35.1% (range 28.4% South Dakota to 43.9% Hawaii), and 11.8% reported ≤5 hours.
  • Sleep disturbances are common and vary by age/sex: 2006 BRFSS (>150,000 residents of 36 states/territories) found sleep disturbance in 13.7%–18.1% of men and 17.7%–25.1% of women; NHANES 2007–2008 found long sleep latency (>30 min) in 18.8%, frequent snoring in 31.5%, and moderate-severe difficulty falling asleep in 7.7%.
  • Health associations include mortality, diabetes, and hypertension: meta-analyses indicate 10%–12% increased mortality risk for short sleep and 30%–38% for long sleep; insufficient sleep is associated with 33% increased incident diabetes; short sleep is associated with 20% increased likelihood of hypertension.
  • Social/behavioral determinants include work, technology, and disparities: work time was the primary determinant of sleep duration, with each hour of delayed work/training start associated with 20 more minutes of sleep; 90% of Americans used an electronic device in the hour before bed; blacks/African Americans had 2.5 times the rate of very short sleep (≤4 hours) and about twice the rate of short sleep (5–6 hours) versus non-Hispanic whites, while Asians/others had 4 times the very short sleep rate.

Methods

  • Design: narrative review and conceptual synthesis; no primary data collection or systematic review protocol is reported in the text.
  • Data/sample: synthesizes population surveys (ATUS, NHIS, NHANES, BRFSS), meta-analyses, laboratory/field studies, and policy literature; examples include BRFSS 2014 (444,306 adults), 2006 BRFSS (>150,000 adults), and NHANES 2007–2008.
  • Main analysis: organizes evidence using a social-ecological model (individual, social, societal levels) and health behavior models (Health Belief Model, Integrated Behavioral Model) to link upstream social influences, sleep, and downstream health/functional outcomes.

Limitations

  • The paper states major limitations: inconsistent sleep assessment methods (self-report, diary, polysomnography, actigraphy disagree; no nationally representative dataset with well-validated sleep duration/quality; inconsistent cutoffs), lack of physiologic sleep measures at the societal level, and complexity of social environments not captured by most studies.
  • The paper also states a lack of interventional studies and empirically supported sleep health interventions, limiting causal inference and community-level recommendations.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not report systematic search, inclusion criteria, or study-quality appraisal, so the synthesis is selective rather than exhaustive.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsmc.2016.10.012

Cites

273 of 273 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 242 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 104 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 32
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 18
44 of 44
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Sleep is a biological requirement for human life, alongside food, water, and air.

    “Sleep is a biological requirement for human life, alongside food, water, and air.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Achieving sleep requires the individual to engage in volitional behaviors.

    “Like consumption of food and unlike breathing air, achieving this biological need requires the individual to engage in volitional behaviors.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The social-ecological model is appropriate for understanding sleep.

    “This model may also be appropriate for understanding sleep.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Shift work is related to adverse health outcomes in both laboratory and field studies.

    “The influence of globalization and 24/7 society on sleep behaviors is particularly relevant, because shift work has been repeatedly shown in both laboratory and field studies to be related to adverse health outcomes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Safety-sensitive professions often institute policies that make healthy sleep difficult.

    “The problem is that these professions often institute policies that make healthy sleep difficult.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Formal regulations for sleep disorders screening and fatigue mitigation among commercial drivers have not yet been passed.

    “In the transportation industry, recommendations by the National Highway Transportation and Safety Administration address the need for sleep disorders screening and fatigue mitigation among commercial drivers,250 although formal regulations have not yet been passed.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Figure 3 is assigned two different models

    Minor

    The paper identifies Fig. 3 as a detailed depiction of upstream social-environmental influences, but later identifies it as a schematic of the Health Belief Model.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 293 references

20 of the 293 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Pandey, 2011, Short sleep and dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes toward sleep among black men, Sleep, 34, 261
  2. Sell, 2009, Ethnic differences in sleep-health knowledge, Sleep, 32, A392
  3. Orzech, 2012, Electronic media use within 2 hours of bedtime predicts sleep variables in college students, Sleep, 35, A73

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 708

Metadata

Authors
Grandner, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Grandner, Michael A.
Venue
Sleep Medicine Clinics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
1-22
ISSN
1556-407X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2567025824
Cited by
720
References
293
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine Clinics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL110216)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R01MD011600)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
sleep, sleep duration, sleep disorders, insomnia, sleep apnea, cardiovascular risk, metabolic disease risk, neurocognitive impairment, mortality, health disparities, socioeconomic factors, race and ethnicity, sex differences, aging, globalization, public policy, public safety, technology use
MeSH terms
Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Public Health, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Sociological Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review