Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 936

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NIX is required for programmed mitochondrial clearance during reticulocyte maturation

Open access
Schweers, Rachel L., Zhang, Ji, Randall, Mindy S., Loyd, Melanie R., Li, Weimin, Dorsey, Frank C., Kundu, Mondira, Opferman, Joseph T., Cleveland, John L., Miller, Jeffery L., Ney, Paul A.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The regulated clearance of mitochondria is a well recognized but poorly understood aspect of cellular homeostasis, and defects in this process have been linked to aging, degenerative diseases, and cancer. Mitochondria are recycled through an autophagy-related process, and reticulocytes, which completely eliminate their mitochondria during maturation, provide a physiological model to study this phenomenon. Here, we show that mitochondrial clearance in reticulocytes requires the BCL2-related protein NIX (BNIP3L). Mitochondrial clearance does not require BAX, BAK, BCL-X L , BIM, or PUMA, indicating that NIX does not function through established proapoptotic pathways. Similarly, NIX is not required for the induction of autophagy during terminal erythroid differentiation. NIX is required for the selective elimination of mitochondria, however, because mitochondrial clearance, in the absence of NIX, is arrested at the stage of mitochondrial incorporation into autophagosomes and autophagosome maturation. These results yield insight into the mechanism of mitochondrial clearance in higher eukaryotes. Furthermore, they show a BAX- and BAK-independent role for a BCL2-related protein in development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0708818104

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1126/science.1059108 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.027 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.1133289 · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.95.9.4997 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/35160 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90202-X · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199803)21:3<230::AID-GCC7>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
  8. 10.1084/jem.186.12.1975 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1074/jbc.274.1.7 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1074/jbc.273.20.12415 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202722 · DOI
  12. 10.1128/MCB.20.15.5454-5468.2000 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1073/pnas.97.16.9082 · DOI · Paper page
  14. HM Sowter, PJ Ratcliffe, P Watson, AH Greenberg, AL Harris Cancer Res 61, 6669–6673 (2001).
  15. 10.1074/jbc.M509056200 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.10.012 · DOI
  17. 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3324 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nm719 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1073/pnas.0610666104 · DOI
  20. 10.1136/jcp.43.8.675 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/26500 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1073/pnas.0504783102 · DOI
  23. 10.1242/dev.127.22.4949 · DOI
  24. 10.1182/blood-2004-11-4344 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601689 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401765 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1242/jcs.01131 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1038/ncb1426 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.11.044 · DOI
  31. 10.4161/auto.4034 · DOI
  32. 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0686 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00120-5 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/nar/25.21.4323 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00244-7 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/jcp.1041210311 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Schweers, R. L., Zhang, J., Randall, M. S., Loyd, M. R., Li, W., Dorsey, F. C., Kundu, M., Opferman, J. T., Cleveland, J. L., Miller, J. L., & Ney, P. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-12-04
Volume
104
Issue
49
Pages
19500-19505
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1968843321
Cited by
936
References
8
FWCI
19.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.