Cited by 3,054Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionResilience and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 199 of the 218 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 14 of the 149 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health

Open access
Kashdan, Todd B., Rottenberg, Jonathan·2010·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Traditionally, positive emotions and thoughts, strengths, and the satisfaction of basic psychological needs for belonging, competence, and autonomy have been seen as the cornerstones of psychological health. Without disputing their importance, these foci fail to capture many of the fluctuating, conflicting forces that are readily apparent when people navigate the environment and social world. In this paper, we review literature to offer evidence for the prominence of psychological flexibility in understanding psychological health. Thus far, the importance of psychological flexibility has been obscured by the isolation and disconnection of research conducted on this topic. Psychological flexibility spans a wide range of human abilities to: recognize and adapt to various situational demands; shift mindsets or behavioral repertoires when these strategies compromise personal or social functioning; maintain balance among important life domains; and be aware, open, and committed to behaviors that are congruent with deeply held values. In many forms of psychopathology, these flexibility processes are absent. In hopes of creating a more coherent understanding, we synthesize work in emotion regulation, mindfulness and acceptance, social and personality psychology, and neuropsychology. Basic research findings provide insight into the nature, correlates, and consequences of psychological flexibility and applied research provides details on promising interventions. Throughout, we emphasize dynamic approaches that might capture this fluid construct in the real-world.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001

Cites

199 of 199 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

14 of 149 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 132 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 52
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 18
65 of 65
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A flexible approach to one's experiences is associated with health and well-being even when those experiences are sometimes painful.

    “Our premise, shared with the “acceptance-based approaches,” is that a flexible approach to one’s experiences will be associated with health and well-being, even when those experiences are sometimes painful.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No systematic review of psychological flexibility exists.

    “which makes it all the more surprising that there has yet to be a systematic review of this topic.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In many forms of psychopathology, flexibility processes are absent.

    “In many forms of psychopathology, these flexibility processes are absent.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

19 of the 218 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kashdan, T.B., Breen, W.E., & Julian, T. (in press). Everyday strivings in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: Problems arise when avoidance and emotion regulation dominate. Behavior Therapy.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3,054

Metadata

Authors
Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J.
Affiliations
  • George Mason University (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Kashdan, Todd B.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
865-878
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163215199
Cited by
3,054
References
218
Citations by year
2026: 293 · 2025: 332 · 2024: 298 · 2023: 311 · 2022: 283 · 2021: 278 · 2020: 283 · 2019: 179 · 2018: 190 · 2017: 144 · 2016: 110 · 2015: 111 · 2014: 97 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 45
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH073937)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
psychological flexibility, mental health, emotion regulation, mindfulness, acceptance, basic psychological needs, value congruence, psychopathology, intervention, dynamic approach, mindset, behavioral repertoire
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Emotions, Humans, Mental Health, Social Adjustment, Social Control, Informal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review