The DOI matches its Crossref record; 135 of the 152 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 78 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Mechanisms of mindfulness training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT
Open accessAbstract
Despite evidence linking trait mindfulness and mindfulness training with a broad range of effects, still little is known about its underlying active mechanisms. Mindfulness is commonly defined as (1) the ongoing monitoring of present-moment experience (2) with an orientation of acceptance. Building on conceptual, clinical, and empirical work, we describe a testable theoretical account to help explain mindfulness effects on cognition, affect, stress, and health outcomes. Specifically, Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT) posits that (1), by enhancing awareness of one's experiences, the skill of attention monitoring explains how mindfulness improves cognitive functioning outcomes, yet this same skill can increase affective reactivity. Second (2), by modifying one's relation to monitored experience, acceptance is necessary for reducing affective reactivity, such that attention monitoring and acceptance skills together explain how mindfulness improves negative affectivity, stress, and stress-related health outcomes. We discuss how MAT contributes to mindfulness science, suggest plausible alternatives to the account, and offer specific predictions for future research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 78 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
In the paper
“monitoring skills (Observe), but not acceptance (Accept without Judgment), increased following training compared to a waitlist control.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR MAT? > Tenet #1: Attention Monitoring Alone Enhances Awareness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baas et al., 2014 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: Self-report measures of monitoring and acceptance meaningfully, though imperfectly, reflect the skills developed through mindfulness training.
- The authors state this as an assumption: In the reviewed samples, the tendency to monitor experience does not necessarily correspond to a tendency to accept experience.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“five studies have tested this prediction.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR MAT? > Tenet #1: Attention Monitoring Alone Enhances Awareness
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: Self-report measures of monitoring and acceptance meaningfully, though imperfectly, reflect the skills developed through mindfulness training.
In the paper
“in a combined sample of meditators and non-meditators, monitoring skills (Observe) (and also acceptance skills) were related to performance on a focused attention task (Moore & Malinowski, 2009).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR MAT? > Tenet #1: Attention Monitoring Alone Enhances Awareness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Moore & Malinowski, 2009 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: Self-report measures of monitoring and acceptance meaningfully, though imperfectly, reflect the skills developed through mindfulness training.
- The authors state this as an assumption: In the reviewed samples, the tendency to monitor experience does not necessarily correspond to a tendency to accept experience.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“stress (e.g., subjective and physiological stress reactivity)”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIn the paper
“Over the course of mindfulness training, sustained attention also improves as the ability to maintain contact with present-moment experience develops (Chiesa et al., 2011).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT) > Attention Monitoring
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chiesa et al., 2011 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“stress reduction (Creswell & Lindsay, 2014)”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Creswell & Lindsay, 2014
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MAT posits that there are distinct and synergistic effects of attention monitoring and acceptance skills on outcomes reported in the mindfulness literature.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“learning the skill of attention monitoring is sufficient for improving cognitive outcomes (e.g., selective attention, sustained attention, and task switching; working memory; insight)”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“randomized controlled trials indicate that mindfulness training can impact a broad range of outcomes, including effects on cognition and affect (e.g., attention, working memory, emotion regulation; for reviews, see Chiesa, Calati, & Serretti, 2011; Keng, Smoski, & Robins, 2011; Tang, Hölzel, & Posner, 2015)”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > Abstract
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“the dispositional tendency to be mindful in daily life (as measured by validated self-report instruments of trait mindfulness) is associated with an array of beneficial emotion and attention regulation outcomes (Brown, Ryan, & Creswell, 2007).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brown, Ryan, & Creswell, 2007 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 39
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
In the paper
“self-reported creative behavior increased following this attention monitoring training, and increases in Observe skills from pre- to post-training predicted these increases in creative behavior”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR MAT? > Tenet #1: Attention Monitoring Alone Enhances Awareness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baas et al., 2014 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Self-report measures of monitoring and acceptance meaningfully, though imperfectly, reflect the skills developed through mindfulness training.
- The authors state this as an assumption: In the reviewed samples, the tendency to monitor experience does not necessarily correspond to a tendency to accept experience.
In the paper
“the self-reported tendency to monitor (Observe) was associated with higher task-based perceptual accuracy in two student samples, while acceptance was unrelated to perceptual accuracy; this relationship between monitoring and perceptual accuracy held across tasks with and without working memory load (Anicha, Ode, Moeller, & Robinson, 2012).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR MAT? > Tenet #1: Attention Monitoring Alone Enhances Awareness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Anicha, Ode, Moeller, & Robinson, 2012 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Self-report measures of monitoring and acceptance meaningfully, though imperfectly, reflect the skills developed through mindfulness training.
- The authors state this as an assumption: In the reviewed samples, the tendency to monitor experience does not necessarily correspond to a tendency to accept experience.
In the paper
“creative performance in a student sample related to attention monitoring only, rather than monitoring and acceptance together (Baas, Nevicka, & Velden, 2014); specifically, monitoring (Observe), but not acceptance (Accept without Judgment) correlated with creative ideation and self-reported creativity.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR MAT? > Tenet #1: Attention Monitoring Alone Enhances Awareness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baas, Nevicka, & Velden, 2014 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Self-report measures of monitoring and acceptance meaningfully, though imperfectly, reflect the skills developed through mindfulness training.
- The authors state this as an assumption: In the reviewed samples, the tendency to monitor experience does not necessarily correspond to a tendency to accept experience.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, we treat attention monitoring and acceptance as distinct and dissociable skills that together comprise the active mechanisms for mindfulness and mindfulness training effects.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > COMPONENTS OF MINDFULNESS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“there is evidence to suggest that attention monitoring skills begin to improve more immediately after practice, while acceptance may take longer to cultivate (Baer, Carmody, & Hunsinger, 2012; Desbordes et al., 2015).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > COMPONENTS OF MINDFULNESS
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Attention monitoring and acceptance instructions are central to many well-known mindfulness training interventions, and increases in awareness and nonreactivity are considered common processes across mindfulness-based interventions (Chambers, Gullone, & Allen, 2009).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > COMPONENTS OF MINDFULNESS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chambers, Gullone, & Allen, 2009 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“as well as many mental and physical health outcomes (e.g., delaying HIV progression, reducing risk for drug abuse and depression relapse, reducing PTSD symptomatology; Creswell, Myers, Cole, & Irwin, 2009; Bowen et al., 2014; Teasdale et al., 2000; Polusny et al., 2015; for reviews, see Khoury et al., 2013; Ludwig & Kabat-Zinn, 2008).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > Abstract
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and physical health outcomes (e.g., stress-related immune and disease outcomes).”
- Also stated in: § MAT Core Tenets · plain
“improve stress-related health outcomes.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearThe quote only partly states this claim.
- Also stated in: § MAT Core Tenets · plain
In the paper
“This capacity to monitor momentary experience relies on selective and executive attention networks. Specifically, conflict monitoring skills are important for recognizing when the mind wanders from its intended focus (e.g., breath), and orienting skills are necessary to redirect attention back to this focus object (cf. Malinowski, 2013).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT) > Attention Monitoring
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Malinowski, 2013 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“enhancing attention to affective information (potentially intensifying both negative and positive reactivity)”
- Also stated in: § Tenet #1: Attention Monitoring Alone Enhances Awareness · plain
“For affective, stress, and stress-related health outcomes, MAT predicts that paying close attention to one’s experiences (high attention monitoring) will exacerbate negative reactivity (and enhance positive reactivity) independent of acceptance.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Tenet #1: Attention Monitoring Alone Enhances Awareness · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MAT posits that the two basic components of mindfulness (attention monitoring and acceptance) speak directly to the active mechanisms distinguishing it from other psychological constructs and intervention elements, and that these components and their interactions help explain an array of mindfulness-specific outcomes reported in the literature.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > COMPONENTS OF MINDFULNESS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a clinical sample, acceptance (Nonreactivity) moderated the effect of monitoring (Observe) on symptoms; among participants low in acceptance, high monitoring predicted higher rumination, worry, and depressive symptoms, and lower reappraisal (Desrosiers, Vine, Curtiss, & Klemanski, 2014).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR MAT? > Tenet #1: Attention Monitoring Alone Enhances Awareness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Desrosiers, Vine, Curtiss, & Klemanski, 2014 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“When executive attention is exercised in affective contexts, we predict that monitoring increases awareness of affective information, and acceptance facilitates both early engagement with (Teper & Inzlicht, 2013) and disengagement from affective stimuli (Vago & Nakamura, 2011), thus reducing further emotional reactivity.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT) > Attention Monitoring
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Teper & Inzlicht, 2013
- Not checked yetcites Vago & Nakamura, 2011 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“meditation training programs that focus on these attention training practices have been shown to improve selective and executive attention ability and working memory (Chiesa et al., 2011; Jha, Krompinger, & Baime, 2007; Lutz, Slagter, Dunne, & Davidson, 2008).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT) > Attention Monitoring
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The tendency to monitor present-moment experiences–by itself–is often predictive of higher levels of psychological distress, but also relates to positive outcomes (although it’s unclear whether the relationship between monitoring and positive outcomes is driven by a combined tendency to monitor to experiences with acceptance, a hypothesis not tested in any of the reviewed studies).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR MAT? > Tenet #1: Attention Monitoring Alone Enhances Awareness
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“mindfulness training programs do not teach acceptance skills in isolation. Rather, attention monitoring practices provide a scaffold for noticing moment-to-moment experience, which are viewed through an accepting lens.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT) > Acceptance
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“reduce negative reactivity (e.g., anxiety, depression, stress) and reduce grasping of positive experiences (e.g., craving, substance use).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT) > MAT Core Tenets
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MAT posits that initial emotional agitation and symptom exacerbation are likely as monitoring is practiced, until acceptance skills are developed to reduce reactivity”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT) > Attention Monitoring
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MAT views acceptance as a dynamic emotion regulation skill, and a critical mechanism for mindfulness training effects on altering affective responses (including boosting executive attention in affective contexts), stress reactivity, and stress-related health outcomes.”
- Also stated in: § MAT Core Tenets · plain
“Acceptance skills modify the way one relates to present-moment experience, regulating reactivity to affective experience.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT) > Acceptance
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § MAT Core Tenets · plain
In the paper
“there is some suggestion that acceptance may facilitate self-distancing and reappraisal of negative autobiographical memories, corresponding with comparative decreases in subgenual ACC and medial PFC activity (Kross, Davidson, Weber, & Ochsner, 2009).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT) > Acceptance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kross, Davidson, Weber, & Ochsner, 2009 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together, these studies begin to suggest that the ability to monitor and attend to stimuli drives the relationship between mindfulness and cognitive functioning (creativity, perceptual accuracy, attentional performance), while acceptance of one’s experience (in four of five studies reviewed) adds no additional benefits for these non-affective cognitive outcomes.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR MAT? > Tenet #1: Attention Monitoring Alone Enhances Awareness
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Self-report measures of monitoring and acceptance meaningfully, though imperfectly, reflect the skills developed through mindfulness training.
- The authors state this as an assumption: In the reviewed samples, the tendency to monitor experience does not necessarily correspond to a tendency to accept experience.
In the paper
“practicing an accepting stance toward emotional experiences may both reduce amygdala activation and quicken amygdala recovery, corresponding with emotion regulatory ability (Desbordes et al., 2015).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT) > Acceptance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Desbordes et al., 2015 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“attention monitoring practices may activate frontal and parietal brain regions (e.g., frontal eye field, dorsolateral PFC, inferior and superior parietal lobules) supporting attention orienting, as well as the executive network (e.g., ACC, anterior insula, basal ganglia) that supports conflict monitoring (Tang et al., 2015).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT) > Attention Monitoring
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tang et al., 2015 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Monitoring skills may increase focus on all types of experiences: without acceptance, this tendency may increase affective reactivity to negative and positive events, and negative affective reactivity may hinder flexible responding on executive attention tasks that involve affect regulation.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR MAT? > Tenet #1: Attention Monitoring Alone Enhances Awareness
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adopting a mental stance of acceptance modifies one’s relationship with all monitored experiences: salient negatively-valenced experiences become less potent, neutral cues can become a source of rest and subtle pleasure, and positive experiences can be savored in the moment.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY (MAT) > Acceptance
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In affective domains, monitoring skills are often related to higher negative psychological and somatic symptoms, as well as some positive outcomes (satisfaction with life and posttraumatic growth).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR MAT? > Literature Review: Summary
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“and better physical health outcomes (Consedine & Butler, 2014; Daubenmier, Hayden, Chang, & Epel, 2014; Klein et al., 2015).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > GENERAL DISCUSSION > Plausible Alternative Accounts to MAT
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we suspect that since attention monitoring and acceptance are central features of all mindfulness accounts, they are likely to be important mechanisms for mindfulness training intervention effects.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > GENERAL DISCUSSION > Plausible Alternative Accounts to MAT
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Attention monitoring and acceptance are central features of every account of mindfulness.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MAT predicts that high levels of monitoring and acceptance together drive reductions in affective reactivity and distress outcomes in healthy populations and reduce symptoms among clinical populations.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR MAT? > Tenet #2: Monitoring + Acceptance Mitigates Affective Reactivity
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“attention monitoring and acceptance components of mindfulness independently and synergistically underlie a broad range of outcomes”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > GENERAL DISCUSSION > Conclusions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While monitoring heightens and enhances experiences, acceptance promotes an adaptive response to these experiences.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR MAT? > Tenet #2: Monitoring + Acceptance Mitigates Affective Reactivity
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MAT predicts that attention monitoring is an important mechanism of mindfulness effects on improved affective and stress reduction outcomes, but only with concomitant high levels of acceptance skills.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR MAT? > Tenet #2: Monitoring + Acceptance Mitigates Affective Reactivity
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Higher monitoring skills (Observe) were associated with lower IL-6, but this relationship was driven by acceptance (Nonreactivity) toward these experiences: participants reporting higher monitoring and acceptance skills had low IL-6 levels, while the tendency to monitor experiences without a stance of acceptance was not associated with IL-6 levels.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR MAT? > Tenet #2: Monitoring + Acceptance Mitigates Affective Reactivity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tomfohr, Pung, Mills, & Edwards, 2015 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our review of the literature, in light of MAT tenet #2, was constrained because few studies examined the interactive effects of monitoring and acceptance skills in predicting outcomes (most studies examined independent effects of monitoring and acceptance subscales separately).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > GENERAL DISCUSSION
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“noticing experiences is crucial for appreciating them and building positive states”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > GENERAL DISCUSSION > Plausible Alternative Accounts to MAT
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“and equally effective for reducing pain ratings and negative affect”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > GENERAL DISCUSSION > Plausible Alternative Accounts to MAT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kohl, Rief, & Glombiewski, 2012 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, attention monitoring alone is related to better cognitive functioning in neutral contexts (better perceptual accuracy and attentional performance; higher creativity) and not consistently related to executive function when affect regulation is involved (Stroop performance).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE FOR MAT? > Literature Review: Summary
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MAT is focused on the mechanisms of mindfulness training interventions where acceptance is not taught independent of monitoring training; instead, mindfulness training interventions teach attention monitoring skills for careful observation of one’s moment-to-moment experience, and acceptance skills are applied to these monitored experiences to regulate automatic reactivity.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > GENERAL DISCUSSION > Plausible Alternative Accounts to MAT
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Acceptance cannot be trained without some target object to monitor.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Practice in monitoring one’s experiences trains attentional processes and enhances these experiences as they occur in the present moment.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > GENERAL DISCUSSION > Conclusions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“higher well-being, self-esteem, and pro-environmental behavior (Barbaro & Pickett, 2016; Cash & Whittingham, 2010; Christopher & Gilbert, 2010);”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > GENERAL DISCUSSION > Plausible Alternative Accounts to MAT
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“lower worry, rumination, negative cognitions, and emotion dysregulation (Christopher & Gilbert, 2010; Fisak & Lehe, 2012; Paul et al., 2013; Reese et al., 2015);”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > GENERAL DISCUSSION > Plausible Alternative Accounts to MAT
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MAT builds on conceptual, clinical, and empirical work to provide a theoretical framework outlining the putative active mechanisms of mindfulness training, with the hope that by understanding mechanisms we can develop and deliver more effective and efficient interventions.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > GENERAL DISCUSSION
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings indicate that attention monitoring skills alone (1a) are associated with better cognitive functioning on non-affective tasks (e.g., perceptual accuracy, attentional performance, creativity), but (1b) do not reliably predict executive attention on tasks that rely on both attentional control and affect regulation (e.g., Stroop task).”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > GENERAL DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Acceptance modifies the way an individual relates to the content of monitored experience, tempering affective reactivity to produce a variety of beneficial outcomes across affective and physical health domains.”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > GENERAL DISCUSSION > Conclusions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“acceptance appears to be essential for reducing symptoms (and the grasping of positive experiences)”
§ Mechanisms of Mindfulness Training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT)1 > GENERAL DISCUSSION > Plausible Alternative Accounts to MAT
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The literature lacks a theory connecting the psychological mechanisms of mindfulness to the many reported mindfulness-related outcomes.
“Yet, despite these advances, still little theory links the psychological mechanisms of mindfulness with the broad variety of mindfulness-related outcomes reported in the literature.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is little experimental work directly testing MAT.
“it is a new theoretical account and as such there is little experimental work directly testing it.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Self-report measures of monitoring and acceptance meaningfully, though imperfectly, reflect the skills developed through mindfulness training.
“assuming meaningful (albeit imperfect) associations between the development of monitoring and acceptance skills through mindfulness training and the self-reporting of these same skills.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In the reviewed samples, the tendency to monitor experience does not necessarily correspond to a tendency to accept experience.
“assuming that the tendency to monitor experience in the samples reviewed does not necessarily correspond to a tendency to accept those experiences.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The FFMQ Observe, Nonreactivity, and Nonjudgment subscales validly measure attention monitoring and acceptance skills.
“We also only reviewed results from mindfulness subscales that clearly map onto attention monitoring and acceptance.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Acceptance cannot be trained without some target object to monitor.
“it’s not clear how acceptance would be trained in the absence of a target object to monitor with acceptance”
The paper relies on this without support.
Attention monitoring and acceptance are central features of every account of mindfulness.
“since attention monitoring and acceptance are central features of all mindfulness accounts”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT; 24) suggests that the mechanism behind stress reduction through mindfulness training is divided into two steps following each other: First, participants learn attentional and interoceptive capacities (monitoring). Second, they develop emotional capacities, focusing on strengthening a sense of acceptance, which manages”
From Reducing neuroendocrine psychosocial stress response through socio-emotional dyadic but not mindfulness online training (2024) · cites this paper as [24]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Mindfulness has previously been associated with stress reduction and improved relaxation, among other benefits [16,58,59].”
From Web-Based Mindfulness Meditation as an Adjunct to Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Public Safety Personnel: Mixed Methods Feasibility Evaluation Study (2024) · cites this paper as [59]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, studies that have independently assessed the two dimensions, attention monitoring and acceptance, have revealed that acceptance only has an effect on psychological symptoms such as depression and anxiety and that attention monitoring alone, without the acceptance dimension, could increase anxiety (e.g. Brown et al., 2015; Kohls et al., 2009; Lindsay & Creswell, 2017).”
From Acceptance Is a Better Predictor of Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, and Well-Being Compared to Other Emotional Competences. (2025) · cites this paper as Lindsay & Creswell, 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Research evidence suggests that these MABI's underlying mechanisms may be very relevant in order to help athletes to manage their internal experiences more effectively and maintain optimal functioning in highly demanding performance environments (for reviews, see Bühlmayer et al., 2017; Gardner & Moore, 2012, 2017; Lindsay & Creswell, 2017; Noetel et al., 2017; Sappington &am”
From Integrated mindfulness-based intervention: Effects on mindfulness skills, cognitive interference and performance satisfaction of young elite badminton players. (2020) · cites this paper as Lindsay & Creswell, 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, according to Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT; Lindsay & Creswell, 2017), these two mechanisms should not be taught in isolation but rather together, considering their potential synergistic effects.”
From Integrated mindfulness-based intervention: Effects on mindfulness skills, cognitive interference and performance satisfaction of young elite badminton players. (2020) · cites this paper as Lindsay & Creswell, 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, both stronger evidence and enhanced knowledge about the MABI's underlying active mechanisms are still needed in order to achieve more effective interventions for the desired outcomes related to sport performance among elite athletes (Gardner & Moore, 2017; Lindsay & Creswell, 2017; Noetel et al., 2017).”
From Integrated mindfulness-based intervention: Effects on mindfulness skills, cognitive interference and performance satisfaction of young elite badminton players. (2020) · cites this paper as Lindsay & Creswell, 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“mindfulness may enhance acceptance by promoting a nonjudgmental and compassionate attitude towards one's experiences [18, 83–85].”
From Emotion Regulation as a Mechanism of Mindfulness in Individual Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety Disorders (2024) · cites this paper as [85]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“By learning to acknowledge emotions without criticism or resistance, individuals can diminish the intensity and associated distress of their experiences [85].”
From Emotion Regulation as a Mechanism of Mindfulness in Individual Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety Disorders (2024) · cites this paper as [85]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“conceptual frameworks pushing for a systematic theory-driven investigation of these interventions [5,23,24,25] have posited domain-specific effects of specific practices.”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Conceptual models of psychopathology and prominent perspectives on MBIs have consistently proposed certain key underlying psychological processes, such as emotion regulation and mindfulness skills [5,24,42,43,44,45,48,50,63,64,65,66].”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“According to MAT, acceptance is an umbrella term encompassing a broad range of constructs, including the non-judging and non-reactivity facets of mindfulness (Lindsay and Creswell, 2017).”
From Mindfulness acting with awareness and emotional eating among polycystic ovary syndrome women with infertility: the mediating role of depression (2024) · cites this paper as Lindsay and Creswell, 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Acceptance has been shown to reduce reactivity (Lindsay and Creswell 2017; Lindsay et al. 2018)”
From Development and Validation of the Equanimity Scale-16 (2021) · cites this paper as Lindsay and Creswell 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The combined skill of monitoring and acceptance has been suggested to be a key mechanism of beneficial change (Cayoun et al. 2020; Lindsay and Creswell 2017).”
From Development and Validation of the Equanimity Scale-16 (2021) · cites this paper as Lindsay and Creswell 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Lindsay and Creswell [19] proposed the Monitoring and Acceptance theory (MAT), according to which mindfulness works through the two mechanisms of attention monitoring and acceptance: while monitoring alone tends to increase affective reactivity, monitoring and acceptance together lead to increased psychophysical well-being.”
From Accept anxiety to improve sleep: The impact of the covid-19 lockdown on the relationships between mindfulness, distress and sleep quality (2021) · cites this paper as [19]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Nonreactivity and nonjudging belong with the acceptance component in Monitor and Acceptance Theory [34], a recently proposed model to describe mechanisms of mindfulness for cognition, affect, stress, and health.”
From Changes in depression and anxiety through mindfulness group therapy in Japan: The role of mindfulness and self-compassion as possible mediators (2019) · cites this paper as [34]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, monitoring attention and acceptance are the central mechanisms in mindfulness training programs; these interact to improve stress, affect, and health outcomes (Lindsay and Creswell, 2017).”
From The Development of Mindful-Based Dance Movement Therapy Intervention for Chronic Pain: A Pilot Study With Chronic Headache Patients (2021) · cites this paper as Lindsay and Creswell, 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“previous studies that have shown that attention monitoring alone, without the dimension of acceptance, could even increase anxiety (Brown et al., 2015; Kohls et al., 2009; Lindsay & Creswell, 2017)”
From Acceptance Is a Better Predictor of Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, and Well-Being Compared to Other Emotional Competences. (2025) · cites this paper as Lindsay & Creswell, 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Specifically, MABI's beneficial effects on a wide range of outcomes, comprising effects on cognition and affect, may be explained by two main mechanisms (for a review, see Lindsay & Creswell, 2017): (a) the use of attention to monitor present-moment experience (i.e., attention monitoring skills), and (b) a mental attitude of acceptance toward momentary experience (i.e.,”
From Integrated mindfulness-based intervention: Effects on mindfulness skills, cognitive interference and performance satisfaction of young elite badminton players. (2020) · cites this paper as Lindsay & Creswell, 2017
In the citing paper
“A variety of MBI-specific psychological mechanisms have been proposed (see Table 2).”
From A common factors perspective on mindfulness-based interventions (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“these findings were consistent with a proposed mechanistic model explaining how mindfulness impacts health outcomes, that it is the combination of monitoring and acceptance that encourages nonreactivity and improved emotion regulation (Monitor and Acceptance Theory; Lindsay & Creswell, 2017).”
From Dismantling Mindfulness-Based Programs: a Systematic Review to Identify Active Components of Treatment (2020) · cites this paper as Lindsay & Creswell, 2017
In the citing paper
“Monitor and Acceptance Training (MAT) [74] posits that deliberately combining attention monitoring with acceptance (e.g., mental attitude of nonjudgment, openness and receptivity, and equanimity toward internal and external experiences) will produce superior cognitive and affective change.”
From All together now: utilizing common functional change principles to unify cognitive behavioral and mindfulness-based therapies (2019) · cites this paper as [74]
In the citing paper
“However, mindfulness requires conscious effort and can be difficult to maintain, particularly for novice meditators who already expend greater cognitive resources to control their self-regulatory skills [7-9].”
From Understanding How Virtual Reality Can Support Mindfulness Practice: Mixed Methods Study (2020) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Acceptance is not central to every account described
MinorThe claim that acceptance is central to all mindfulness accounts conflicts with the paper's description of accounts that treat it as a separate construct rather than a central component.
“since attention monitoring and acceptance are central features of all mindfulness accounts”
“some Buddhist accounts of mindfulness as ‘clear awareness’ focus on attention monitoring as a sole component, and consider acceptance to be a separate distinct construct (rather than a central component of mindfulness; Desbordes et al., 2015).”
Citations
Cites
The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 · Cited by 13,448 · cited 2×
“…and distracted behavior being an openness to engaging with one’s experiences), and also measures attention monitoring (on one’s actions or not) (see Brown & Ryan, 2003 for a discussion of the Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS) development, on which Act with Awareness is primarily…”
BackgroundAssessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191105283504 · Cited by 7,511
Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition.
Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., et al. (2004) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.bph077 · Cited by 7,234 · cited 1×
“…and measures: (1) the use of attention to monitor one’s present moment experiences, and (2) a mental attitude of acceptance toward momentary experience (for reviews of the conceptualizations of mindfulness, see Bishop et al., 2004; Quaglia, Brown, Lindsay, Creswell, & Goodman, 2014).”
BackgroundEmotion regulation: current status and future prospects
Gross, J. J. (2015) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2014.940781 · Cited by 5,229 · cited 1×
“Acting early in the stage of attentional deployment (Gross, 2015), acceptance allows a person to orient toward arising affective experiences, monitor them as they occur, and let them pass.”
BackgroundMindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review
Baer, R. A. (2003) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.bpg015 · Cited by 4,577 · cited 2×
“…other multi-dimensional models of mindfulness training (which are important to rigorously evaluate; e.g., self-management, dereification, intention; Baer, 2003; Lutz, Jha, Dunne, & Saron, 2015; Shapiro et al., 2006), the basic components of attention monitoring and acceptance are common factors…”
BackgroundMindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review.
Baer, R. A. (2003) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy/bpg015 · Cited by 4,576
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3 · Cited by 4,255 · cited 1×
“Perhaps most familiar to psychological and behavioral medicine scientists is the MindfulnessBased Stress Reduction (MBSR) program, an 8-week group-based training program that fosters mindfulness through a series of guided mindfulness meditation practices (Kabat-Zinn, 1982).”
BackgroundShapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20237 · Cited by 4,002 · cited 2×
“And though additional active features are identified in other multi-dimensional models of mindfulness training (which are important to rigorously evaluate; e.g., self-management, dereification, intention; Baer, 2003; Lutz, Jha, Dunne, & Saron, 2015; Shapiro et al., 2006), the basic components of attention monitoring a…”
BackgroundMindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits
Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2004) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(03)00573-7 · Cited by 3,958
Mindfulness: Theoretical Foundations and Evidence for its Salutary Effects
Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/10478400701598298 · Cited by 3,654
Self-citationHayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.64.6.1152 · Cited by 3,595
Handbook of emotion regulation
Gross, J. (2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.52-1127 · Cited by 3,283
Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy.
Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., Ridgeway, V. A., Soulsby, J. M., & Lau, M. A. (2000) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.68.4.615 · Cited by 3,236 · cited 2×
“, attention, working memory, emotion regulation; for reviews, see Chiesa, Calati, & Serretti, 2011; Keng, Smoski, & Robins, 2011; Tang, Hölzel, & Posner, 2015), stress reduction (Creswell & Lindsay, 2014), as well as manymental and physical health outcomes (e.g., delaying HIV progression, reducing risk for drug abuse…”
Background(2005) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,197
Hölzel, B. K., Lazar, S. W., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D. R., & Ott, U. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611419671 · Cited by 3,024 · cited 3×
“Now, a new wave of interest seeks to characterize the underlying processes involved in trait mindfulness and mindfulness meditation practices (e.g., Hölzel et al., 2011; Lutz, Jha, Dunne, & Saron, 2015; Vago & Silbersweig, 2012).”
BackgroundMethodBaer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., Walsh, E., Duggan, D., & Williams, J. M. G. (2008) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191107313003 · Cited by 2,930 · cited 2×
“Indeed, the FFMQ Observe subscale is consistently unrelated to or negatively correlated with other mindfulness subscales among non-meditators, but positively correlated among meditators (e.g., Baer et al., 2008; Baer, Smith, Hopkins, Krietemeyer, & Toney, 2006).”
BackgroundResultWherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life
Kwee, M. G. T. (1995) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(95)90133-7 · Cited by 2,912 · cited 2×
“Mindfulness is commonly defined as a way of paying attention to present-moment experience with amental stance of receptivity and acceptance (Kabat-Zinn, 1994).”
BackgroundThe Neuroscience of Mindfulness Meditation
Tang, Y.-Y., Hölzel, B. K., & Posner, M. I. (2015) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3916 · Cited by 2,889 · cited 4×
“…may activate frontal and parietal brain regions (e.g., frontal eye field, dorsolateral PFC, inferior and superior parietal lobules) supporting attention orienting, as well as the executive network (e.g., ACC, anterior insula, basal ganglia) that supports conflict monitoring (Tang et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEffects of mindfulness on psychological health: A review of empirical studies
Keng, S.-L., Smoski, M. J., & Robins, C. J. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.04.006 · Cited by 2,687
Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation
Lutz, A., Slagter, H. A., Dunne, J. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.005 · Cited by 2,659
Assessment of Mindfulness by Self-Report: The Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191104268029 · Cited by 2,298
Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis
Khoury, B., Lecomte, T., Fortin, G., Masse, M., Therien, P., Bouchard, V., Chapleau, M.-A., Paquin, K., & Hofmann, S. G. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005 · Cited by 2,003 · cited 1×
“…outcomes (e.g., delaying HIV progression, reducing risk for drug abuse and depression relapse, reducing PTSD symptomatology; Creswell, Myers, Cole, & Irwin, 2009; Bowen et al., 2014; Teasdale et al., 2000; Polusny et al., 2015; for reviews, see Khoury et al., 2013; Ludwig & Kabat-Zinn, 2008).”
BackgroundCreswell, J. D. (2017) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-042716-051139 · Cited by 1,702 · cited 10×
“, & Creswell, J. D. (2015). Back to the Basics: How Attention Monitoring and Acceptance Stimulate Positive Growth.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationFeldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2007) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8 · Cited by 1,630
Mindfulness training modifies subsystems of attention
JHA, A. P., KROMPINGER, J., & BAIME, M. J. (2007) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.7.2.109 · Cited by 1,580
Brewer, J. A., Worhunsky, P. D., Gray, J. R., Tang, Y.-Y., Weber, J., & Kober, H. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1112029108 · Cited by 1,409 · cited 1×
“With long-term practice, though, as acceptance becomes a more automatic response and less effortful regulation of emotion is necessary, the neural correlates of acceptance may change, involving changes in resting state functional connectivity (cf. Brewer et al., 2011; Desbordes et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits: A meta-analysis
Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2003) · Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies · doi:10.1111/j.2042-7166.2003.tb04008.x · Cited by 1,394
Mindfulness meditation improves cognition: evidence of brief mental training
Zeidan, F., Johnson, S. K., Diamond, B. J., David, Z., & Goolkasian, P. (2010) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.03.014 · Cited by 1,363
Mindful emotion regulation: an integrative review
Chambers, R., Gullone, E., & Allen, N. B. (2009) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.06.005 · Cited by 1,360
Vago, D. R., & Silbersweig, D. A. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00296 · Cited by 1,310 · cited 2×
“…interventions (e.g., emotion regulation, attention control, and selfawareness; Hölzel et al., 2011; Shapiro, Carlson, Astin, & Freedman, 2006; Vago & Silbersweig, 2012; Tang et al., 2015) by specifying the underlying components of mindfulness that interact to change these downstream…”
BackgroundChiesa, A., Calati, R., & Serretti, A. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.003 · Cited by 1,295 · cited 3×
“Over the course of mindfulness training, sustained attention also improves as the ability to maintain contact with present-moment experience develops (Chiesa et al., 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialMeditation, mindfulness and cognitive flexibility
Moore, A., & Malinowski, P. (2009) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.12.008 · Cited by 1,220 · cited 3×
“…Stroop performance, monitoring was unrelated to performance in two studies (instead, acceptance predicted performance; Anicha et al., 2012; Teper & Inzlicht, 2013), and predicted fewer errors but not faster reaction time in another study (while acceptance predicted both; Moore & Malinowski, 2009).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialWenzlaff, R. M., & Wegner, D. M. (2000) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.59 · Cited by 1,063
Cognitive Approaches to Emotion and Emotional Disorders
Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1994) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.000325 · Cited by 1,023 · cited 1×
“Common reactions to negative thoughts and feelings are to avoid them or try to change them (which is often unsuccessful; Wenzlaff & Wegner, 2000), or to become hyperfocused on negative symptoms while ignoring the rest of experience (e.g., Farb et al., 2010; Mathews & MacLeod, 1994).”
BackgroundLudwig, D. S. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.300.11.1350 · Cited by 957
The Assessment of Present-Moment Awareness and Acceptance: The Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale
Cardaciotto, L., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Moitra, E., & Farrow, V. (2008) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191107311467 · Cited by 940 · cited 1×
“Describe is not central to the construct of mindfulness (cf. Cardaciotto et al., 2008), as it involves additional cognitive processing and elaboration beyond monitoring one’s experiences; while Describe can foster attention monitoring by keeping one anchored in describing present moment…”
BackgroundKabat-Zinn, J., Wheeler, E., Light, T., Skillings, A., Scharf, M. J., Cropley, T. G., Hosmer, D., & Bernhard, J. D. (1998) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-199809000-00020 · Cited by 826 · cited 1×
“…for these factors or lack these intervention elements (e.g., group support) have been linked with affective and physical health outcomes (e.g., Kabat-Zinn et al., 1998; Polusny et al., 2015; Rosenkranz et al., 2013; Taren et al., 2015), suggesting a mindfulness-specific impact on a broad…”
BackgroundGarland, E. L., Farb, N. A., R. Goldin, P., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2015) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2015.1064294 · Cited by 810 · cited 2×
“…and acceptance in fostering psychological well-being: acceptance appears to be essential for reducing symptoms (and the grasping of positive experiences), while noticing experiences is crucial for appreciating them and building positive states (Garland et al., 2015; Lindsay & Creswell, 2015).”
BackgroundHayes, S. C., Villatte, M., Levin, M., & Hildebrandt, M. (2011) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032210-104449 · Cited by 800
Bowen, S., Witkiewitz, K., Clifasefi, S. L., Grow, J., Chawla, N., Hsu, S. H., Carroll, H. A., Harrop, E., Collins, S. E., Lustyk, M. K., et al. (2014) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4546 · Cited by 701 · cited 2×
“, attention, working memory, emotion regulation; for reviews, see Chiesa, Calati, & Serretti, 2011; Keng, Smoski, & Robins, 2011; Tang, Hölzel, & Posner, 2015), stress reduction (Creswell & Lindsay, 2014), as well as manymental and physical health outcomes (e.g., delaying HIV progression, reducing risk for drug abuse…”
BackgroundLutz, A., Jha, A. P., Dunne, J. D., & Saron, C. D. (2015) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0039585 · Cited by 697 · cited 2×
“And, as mentioned previously, other mechanistic models of mindfulness training describe additional underlying processes that may be equally important in fostering mindfulness and influencing its associated outcomes (e.g., Lutz et al., 2015).”
BackgroundForman, E. M., Herbert, J. D., Moitra, E., Yeomans, P. D., & Geller, P. A. (2007) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445507302202 · Cited by 687
Learning to live with the pain: acceptance of pain predicts adjustment in persons with chronic pain
McCracken, L. M. (1998) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00146-2 · Cited by 685 · cited 2×
“In the health psychology literature, an accepting mindset has been effective for adjusting to chronic pain (McCracken, 1998)2.”
BackgroundGrossman, P. (2011) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0022713 · Cited by 666 · cited 2×
“Despite parallels between monitoring and acceptance components as trained in mindfulness interventions and as measured in multi-faceted selfreport mindfulness scales, there is ongoing debate about the validity of self-report mindfulness measures in relation to mindfulness meditation training (Brown, Ryan, Loverich, Bi…”
BackgroundWhat does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective
Bodhi, B. (2011) · Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.1080/14639947.2011.564813 · Cited by 626 · cited 8×
“Bodhi, B. (2011). What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 19–39. Bowen, S., Witkiewitz, K., Clifasefi, S. L., Grow, J., Chawla, N., Hsu, S. H., ... Larimer, M. E. (2014). Relative efficacy of mindfulness-based relapse prevention, standard relapse prevention, and treatm…”
BackgroundInfluentialPerils and promise in defining and measuring mindfulness: Observations from experience.
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2004) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.bph078 · Cited by 585 · cited 1×
“Acceptance Acceptance is broadly defined as a mental attitude of nonjudgment, openness and receptivity, and equanimity toward internal and external experiences (cf. Baer, Smith, & Allen, 2004; Brown & Ryan, 2004; Desbordes et al., 2015).”
BackgroundAttention training and attention state training
Tang, Y., & Posner, M. I. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.009 · Cited by 566
Teper, R., Segal, Z. V., & Inzlicht, M. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721413495869 · Cited by 554
Neural mechanisms of attentional control in mindfulness meditation
Malinowski, P. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00008 · Cited by 547 · cited 1×
“Specifically, conflict monitoring skills are important for recognizing when the mind wanders from its intended focus (e.g., breath), and orienting skills are necessary to redirect attention back to this focus object (cf. Malinowski, 2013).”
BackgroundWeekly change in mindfulness and perceived stress in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program
Baer, R. A., Carmody, J., & Hunsinger, M. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.21865 · Cited by 546 · cited 4×
“…1-2 weeks of mindfulness training and practice to foster increases in acceptance (as measured by the FFMQ Nonjudgment and Nonreactivity subscales; Baer et al., 2012), and another study suggests that only those already familiar with acceptance strategies are able to effectively utilize very brief…”
BackgroundInfluentialHow Does Mindfulness Training Affect Health? A Mindfulness Stress Buffering Account
Creswell, J. D., & Lindsay, E. K. (2014) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721414547415 · Cited by 543 · cited 3×
“By reducing distress and stress reactivity, MAT predicts that monitoring and acceptance together explain how mindfulness interventions may improve stress-related health outcomes (Creswell & Lindsay, 2014; Grossman, Niemann, Schmidt, & Walach, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMinding one’s emotions: Mindfulness training alters the neural expression of sadness.
Farb, N. A. S., Anderson, A. K., Mayberg, H., Bean, J., McKeon, D., & Segal, Z. V. (2010) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0017151 · Cited by 521 · cited 3×
“In distressing contexts, monitoring momentary experiences in the absence of acceptance encourages a narrow focus on negative stimuli while excluding available neutral sensory cues (Farb et al., 2010).”
BackgroundChadwick, P., Hember, M., Symes, J., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., & Dagnan, D. (2008) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466508x314891 · Cited by 517 · cited 1×
“…that measure subscales mapping onto attention monitoring and acceptance skills (Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R): Chadwick et al., 2008; Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ): Feldman, Hayes, Kumar, Greeson, & Laurenceau, 2007), in our literature search, we…”
BackgroundOn measuring mindfulness in psychosomatic and psychological research
Grossman, P. (2008) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.02.001 · Cited by 514 · cited 2×
“Similarly, the majority of participants in the reviewed studies had no exposure to mindfulness training interventions, and it’s possible that the interpretation of mindfulness scale items differs between mindfulnesstrained and mindfulness-naïve individuals (Grossman, 2008).”
BackgroundDesbordes, G., Gard, T., Hoge, E. A., Hölzel, B. K., Kerr, C., Lazar, S. W., Olendzki, A., & Vago, D. R. (2015) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-013-0269-8 · Cited by 505 · cited 11×
“We note that some intervention approaches train monitoring and acceptance practices concurrently; however, there is evidence to suggest that attentionmonitoring skills begin to improvemore immediately after practice, while acceptance may take longer to cultivate (Baer, Carmody, & Hunsinger, 2012; Desbordes et al., 201…”
BackgroundInfluentialLevitt, J. T., Brown, T. A., Orsillo, S. M., & Barlow, D. H. (2004) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80018-2 · Cited by 479
Handbook of mindfulness: theory, research, and practice
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.191564 · Cited by 473
McCracken, L. M., Vowles, K. E., & Eccleston, C. (2005) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.10.003 · Cited by 466
Arch, J. J., Eifert, G. H., Davies, C., Vilardaga, J. C. P., Rose, R. D., & Craske, M. G. (2012) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028310 · Cited by 443 · cited 2×
“underlie decreases in symptom severity for patients with anxiety and depressive disorders (Arch et al., 2012; Forman, Herbert, Moitra, Yeomans, & Geller, 2007).”
BackgroundDreyfus, G. (2011) · Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.1080/14639947.2011.564815 · Cited by 424 · cited 6×
“…of mindfulness include attention monitoring, but some do not view acceptance as a defining component of mindfulness (cf. Desbordes et al., 2015; Dreyfus, 2011), Tenet #2 focuses on evaluating whether high attention monitoring skills predict specific outcomes at high vs. low levels of…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Impact of Acceptance Versus Control Rationales on Pain Tolerance
Hayes, S. C., Bissett, R. T., Korn, Z., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I. S., Cooper, L. D., & Grundt, A. M. (1999) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395305 · Cited by 388 · cited 1×
“For example, brief acceptance training – which involves monitoring a target object (e.g., momentary pain sensations, feelings of sadness) through an accepting and detached lens – is useful for regulating emotion (cf. Hayes et al., 1999).”
BackgroundCognitive-Affective Neural Plasticity following Active-Controlled Mindfulness Intervention
Allen, M., Dietz, M., Blair, K. S., van Beek, M., Rees, G., Vestergaard-Poulsen, P., Lutz, A., & Roepstorff, A. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2957-12.2012 · Cited by 380 · cited 1×
“…of short-term mindfulness training programs (i.e., 5- to 15-minute inductions; 3-4 sessions of training or longer) have been investigated (e.g., Allen et al., 2012; Creswell, Pacilio, Lindsay, & Brown, 2014; Zeidan, Johnson, Diamond, David, & RUNNING HEAD: MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE…”
Creswell, J. D., Pacilio, L. E., Lindsay, E. K., & Brown, K. W. (2014) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.02.007 · Cited by 376
Self-citationCash, M., & Whittingham, K. (2010) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-010-0023-4 · Cited by 371 · cited 2×
“…& Zvolensky, 2009; Wahbeh, Lu, & Oken, 2011); higher well-being, self-esteem, and pro-environmental behavior (Barbaro & Pickett, 2016; Cash & Whittingham, 2010; Christopher & Gilbert, 2010); and better physical health outcomes (Consedine & Butler, 2014; Daubenmier, Hayden, Chang, & Epel,…”
BackgroundDelayed costs of suppressed pain.
Cioffi, D., & Holloway, J. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.274 · Cited by 361 · cited 1×
“Indeed, some theoretical perspectives advocate for the power of attention monitoring only (e.g., Bodhi, 2011), and there is additional evidence that focused attention monitoring of the sensory qualities of pain can foster accelerated recovery after a coldpressor task (Cioffi & Holloway, 1993).”
BackgroundSahdra, B. K., Shaver, P. R., & Brown, K. W. (2010) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223890903425960 · Cited by 352
Barbaro, N., & Pickett, S. M. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.026 · Cited by 350 · cited 2×
“Monitoring (Observe) also correlated with pro-environmental RUNNING HEAD: MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY 21 behavior (as did acceptance; Barbaro & Pickett, 2016).”
MethodTeper, R., & Inzlicht, M. (2013) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nss045 · Cited by 323 · cited 3×
“…is exercised in affective contexts, we predict that monitoring increases awareness of affective information, and acceptance facilitates both early engagement with (Teper & Inzlicht, 2013) and disengagement from affective stimuli (Vago & Nakamura, 2011), thus reducing further emotional reactivity.”
BackgroundResultPolusny, M. A., Erbes, C. R., Thuras, P., Moran, A., Lamberty, G. J., Collins, R. C., Rodman, J. L., & Lim, K. O. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.8361 · Cited by 315 · cited 4×
“, attention, working memory, emotion regulation; for reviews, see Chiesa, Calati, & Serretti, 2011; Keng, Smoski, & Robins, 2011; Tang, Hölzel, & Posner, 2015), stress reduction (Creswell & Lindsay, 2014), as well as manymental and physical health outcomes (e.g., delaying HIV progression, reducing risk for drug abuse…”
BackgroundInfluentialRosenkranz, M. A., Davidson, R. J., MacCoon, D. G., Sheridan, J. F., Kalin, N. H., & Lutz, A. (2013) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2012.10.013 · Cited by 307 · cited 2×
“…factors or lack these intervention elements (e.g., group support) have been linked with affective and physical health outcomes (e.g., Kabat-Zinn et al., 1998; Polusny et al., 2015; Rosenkranz et al., 2013; Taren et al., 2015), suggesting a mindfulness-specific impact on a broad array of outcomes.”
BackgroundKross, E., Davidson, M., Weber, J., & Ochsner, K. (2009) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.10.019 · Cited by 295
Baer, R. A. (2011) · Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.1080/14639947.2011.564842 · Cited by 279
General principles and empirically supported techniques of cognitive behavior therapy.
O’Donohue, W., & Fisher, J. E. (2009) · Cited by 266
Thompson, B. L., & Waltz, J. (2010) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.02.005 · Cited by 264 · cited 1×
“…Ostafin & Marlatt, 2008; Owens, Walter, Chard, & Davis, 2012; Peters, Eisenlohr-Moul, Upton, & Baer, 2013; Schoorl, Mil-Klinkenberg, & Does, 2015; Thompson & Waltz, 2010; Vujanovic, Youngwirth, Johnson, & Zvolensky, 2009; Wahbeh, Lu, & Oken, 2011); higher well-being, self-esteem, and…”
Creswell, J. D., Myers, H. F., Cole, S. W., & Irwin, M. R. (2009) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2008.07.004 · Cited by 238
Self-citationTaren, A. A., Gianaros, P. J., Greco, C. M., Lindsay, E. K., Fairgrieve, A., Brown, K. W., Rosen, R. K., Ferris, J. L., Julson, E., Marsland, A. L., et al. (2015) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsv066 · Cited by 236 · cited 2×
“…factors or lack these intervention elements (e.g., group support) have been linked with affective and physical health outcomes (e.g., Kabat-Zinn et al., 1998; Polusny et al., 2015; Rosenkranz et al., 2013; Taren et al., 2015), suggesting a mindfulness-specific impact on a broad array of outcomes.”
BackgroundSelf-citationRealistic acceptance as a predictor of decreased survival time in gay men with AIDS.
Reed, G. M., Kemeny, M. E., Taylor, S. E., Wang, H.-Y. J., & al, E. (1994) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.13.4.299 · Cited by 234
How good are patients with panic disorder at perceiving their heartbeats?
Ehlers, A., & Breuer, P. (1996) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/0301-0511(95)05153-8 · Cited by 205 · cited 11×
“As one illustration of this point, when panic disorder patients monitor body sensations (such as their heart rate) during a panic attack, this monitoring can prolong anxiety and panic symptoms (e.g., Ehlers & Breuer, 1996).”
BackgroundInfluentialAssociation between daily coping and end-of-day mood.
Stone, A. A., Kennedy-Moore, E., & Neale, J. M. (1995) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.14.4.341 · Cited by 200
Psychological and neural mechanisms of trait mindfulness in reducing depression vulnerability
Paul, N. A., Stanton, S. J., Greeson, J. M., Smoski, M. J., & Wang, L. (2013) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nss070 · Cited by 193 · cited 2×
“, 2015); lower worry, rumination, negative cognitions, and emotion dysregulation (Christopher & Gilbert, 2010; Fisak & von Lehe, 2012; Paul et al., 2013; Reese et al., 2015); reductions in clinical symptoms (anxiety, depressive, and personality disorders, eating pathology and substance use, and posttraumatic stress di…”
BackgroundSpecific Mindfulness Skills Differentially Predict Creative Performance
Baas, M., Nevicka, B., & Ten Velden, F. S. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214535813 · Cited by 191 · cited 3×
“increases in Observe skills from pre- to post-training predicted these increases in creative behavior (Baas et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialHoge, E. A., Bui, E., Goetter, E., Robinaugh, D. J., Ojserkis, R. A., Fresco, D. M., & Simon, N. M. (2015) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-014-9646-4 · Cited by 188 · cited 2×
“…use, and posttraumatic stress disorder) (Adams et al., 2012; Boden et al., 2012; Compare et al., 2012; Fernandez, Wood, Stein, & Rossi, 2010; Hoge et al., 2015; Kalill, Treanor, & Roemer, 2014; Lavender, Gratz, & Tull, 2011; Ostafin & Marlatt, 2008; Owens, Walter, Chard, & Davis, 2012;…”
Desrosiers, A., Vine, V., Curtiss, J., & Klemanski, D. H. (2014) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.04.024 · Cited by 183 · cited 9×
“…to more rigorously evaluate MAT, more studies are needed to test whether acceptance moderates the association of attention monitoring skills and cognitive, affective, and stress-related outcomes (e.g., Barnes & Lynn, 2010; Desrosiers et al., 2014; Eisenlohr-Moul et al., 2012; Tomfohr et al., 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialVisted, E., Vøllestad, J., Nielsen, M. B., & Nielsen, G. H. (2015) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0283-5 · Cited by 178
Brown, D. B., Bravo, A. J., Roos, C. R., & Pearson, M. R. (2015) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0349-4 · Cited by 178 · cited 2×
“Certainly, studies show that self-reported acceptance alone is associated with lower depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms (Barnes & Lynn, 2010; Brown et al., 2015; Cash & Whittingham, 2010; Desrosiers et al., 2013; Hamill et al., 2015); lower worry, rumination, negative cognitions, and emotion…”
BackgroundMapping Mindfulness Facets Onto Dimensions of Anxiety and Depression
Desrosiers, A., Klemanski, D. H., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2013) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2013.02.001 · Cited by 176 · cited 2×
“…alone is associated with lower depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms (Barnes & Lynn, 2010; Brown et al., 2015; Cash & Whittingham, 2010; Desrosiers et al., 2013; Hamill et al., 2015); lower worry, rumination, negative cognitions, and emotion dysregulation (Christopher & Gilbert, 2010;…”
BackgroundUnited we stand: emphasizing commonalities across cognitive-behavioral therapies.
Mennin, D. S., Ellard, K. K., Fresco, D. M., & Gross, J. J. (2013) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2013.02.004 · Cited by 172
Goldberg, S. B., Wielgosz, J., Dahl, C., Schuyler, B., MacCoon, D. S., Rosenkranz, M., Lutz, A., Sebranek, C. A., & Davidson, R. J. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000233 · Cited by 172 · cited 2×
“Despite parallels between monitoring and acceptance components as trained in mindfulness interventions and as measured in multi-faceted selfreport mindfulness scales, there is ongoing debate about the validity of self-report mindfulness measures in relation to mindfulness meditation training (Brown, Ryan, Loverich, Bi…”
BackgroundMeasuring mindfulness and examining its relationship with alcohol use and negative consequences
Fernandez, A. C., Wood, M. D., Stein, L. A. R., & Rossi, J. S. (2010) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/a0021742 · Cited by 166
Acceptance: An Historical and Conceptual Review
Williams, J. C., & Lynn, S. J. (2010) · Imagination, Cognition and Personality · doi:10.2190/ic.30.1.c · Cited by 155 · cited 1×
“…ability to allow momentary events to arise and pass (nonattachment) without evaluating (nonevaluation) them as good or bad (nonjudgment) as highly related and mutually reinforcing RUNNING HEAD: MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY 11 features of the broader category of acceptance (Williams & Lynn, 2010).”
BackgroundIs learning mindfulness associated with improved affect after mindfulness-based cognitive therapy?
Schroevers, M. J., & Brandsma, R. (2010) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712609x424195 · Cited by 146 · cited 1×
“Further, following an 8-week MBCT training, increases in the tendency to monitor (Observe) predicted increases in positive affect (although it's possible that monitoring was correlated with acceptance among these mindfulnesstrained participants; Schroevers & Brandsma, 2010).”
BackgroundPearson, M. R., Lawless, A. K., Brown, D. B., & Bravo, A. J. (2015) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.009 · Cited by 140 · cited 2×
“Similarly, students with high monitoring skills (Observe) and high levels of acceptance (Nonjudgment) reported significantly lower levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms, affective lability, and distress intolerance than students high in monitoring (Observe) with low levels of acceptance (Nonjudgment) (Pearson et a…”
BackgroundIntegrating DBT-based techniques and concepts to facilitate exposure treatment for PTSD
Becker, C. B., & Zayfert, C. (2001) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/s1077-7229(01)80017-1 · Cited by 138 · cited 1×
“Systematic desensitization and exposure therapies also involve a willingness to monitor difficult experiences with a stance of acceptance (e.g., Becker & Zayfert, 2001).”
BackgroundEisenlohr-Moul, T. A., Walsh, E. C., Charnigo, R. J., Lynam, D. R., & Baer, R. A. (2012) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191112446658 · Cited by 137 · cited 4×
“alcohol use among participants low in monitoring skills compared to those high in monitoring skills (Eisenlohr-Moul et al., 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialVujanovic, A. A., Youngwirth, N. E., Johnson, K. A., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2009) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.08.005 · Cited by 137
How effective are acceptance strategies? A meta-analytic review of experimental results
Kohl, A., Rief, W., & Glombiewski, J. A. (2012) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.03.004 · Cited by 136
Acceptance as a coping reaction: Adaptive or not?
Nakamura, Y. M., & Orth, U. (2005) · Swiss Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1024/1421-0185.64.4.281 · Cited by 122 · cited 1×
“We distinguish acceptance in the mindfulness tradition as equanimity with momentary experiences (in contrast to conceptualizations of acceptance as a resigned acquiescence in response to unwanted situations(Nakamura & Orth, 2005)).”
Mennin, D. S., & Quintero, J. M. (2017) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483365817.n528 · Cited by 116 · cited 1×
“Other common interventions that involve mindfulness meditation training include variants of basic MBSR (e.g., Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)) and Emotion Regulation Therapy (ERT; Mennin & Fresco, 2014).”
BackgroundChristopher, M. S., & Gilbert, B. D. (2010) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-009-9067-9 · Cited by 113 · cited 3×
“…Cash & Whittingham, 2010; Desrosiers et al., 2013; Hamill et al., 2015); lower worry, rumination, negative cognitions, and emotion dysregulation (Christopher & Gilbert, 2010; Fisak & Lehe, 2012; Paul et al., 2013; Reese et al., 2015); reductions in clinical symptoms (anxiety, depressive, and…”
BackgroundInfluentialAnicha, C. L., Ode, S., Moeller, S. K., & Robinson, M. D. (2012) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00722.x · Cited by 111 · cited 4×
“Although three studies found that acceptance, which may help regulate emotional reactivity and free resources for more flexible task responding, was an important component predicting better performance on the Stroop task (Anicha et al., 2012; Moore & Malinowski, 2009; Teper & Inzlicht, 2013), no studies have reported…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialPerils and Promise in Defining and Measuring Mindfulness: Observations From Experience
Brown, K. W. (2004) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy/bph078 · Cited by 111
From conceptualization to operationalization of mindfulness.
Quaglia, J. T., Brown, K. W., Lindsay, E. K., Creswell, J. D., & Goodman, R. J. (2015) · Cited by 111
Self-citationHISTORICAL ASPECTS OF MINDFULNESS AND SELF-ACCEPTANCE IN PSYCHOTHERAPY
Dryden, W., & Still, A. (2006) · Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1007/s10942-006-0026-1 · Cited by 110 · cited 1×
“…cognitive defusion, allowing burdensome or intrusive negative experiences and memories to be described so that cognitive processing and possibly meaning-making can take place; the patient integrates these difficult experiences into his or her narrative, or lets them go (e.g., Dryden & Still, 2006).”
BackgroundBrown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., Loverich, T. M., Biegel, G. M., & West, A. M. (2011) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0025781 · Cited by 109
Ostafin, B. D., & Marlatt, G. A. (2008) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2008.27.4.404 · Cited by 109 · cited 1×
“…Compare et al., 2012; Fernandez, Wood, Stein, & Rossi, 2010; Hoge et al., 2015; Kalill, Treanor, & Roemer, 2014; Lavender, Gratz, & Tull, 2011; Ostafin & Marlatt, 2008; Owens, Walter, Chard, & Davis, 2012; Peters, Eisenlohr-Moul, Upton, & Baer, 2013; Schoorl, Mil-Klinkenberg, & Does, 2015;…”
Chopko, B. A., & Schwartz, R. C. (2009) · Journal of Mental Health Counseling · doi:10.17744/mehc.31.4.9w6lhk4v66423385 · Cited by 105 · cited 1×
“…independent of acceptance, monitoring (Observe) was positively associated with selfesteem and satisfaction with life among healthy students (Christopher & Gilbert, 2010), and with positive growth in the months and years following trauma exposure among police officers (Chopko & Schwartz, 2009).”
BackgroundVago, D. R., & Nakamura, Y. (2011) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-011-9391-x · Cited by 93 · cited 2×
“…is exercised in affective contexts, we predict that monitoring increases awareness of affective information, and acceptance facilitates both early engagement with (Teper & Inzlicht, 2013) and disengagement from affective stimuli (Vago & Nakamura, 2011), thus reducing further emotional reactivity.”
BackgroundMindfulness Skills and Depressive Symptoms: A Longitudinal Study
Barnes, S. M., & Lynn, S. J. (2010) · Imagination, Cognition and Personality · doi:10.2190/ic.30.1.e · Cited by 85 · cited 6×
“…between monitoring and psychological distress: the tendency to monitor experience (Observe) has been correlated with higher depressive symptoms (Barnes & Lynn, 2010), stress symptoms (Brown, Bravo, Roos, & Pearson, 2015; Hamill et al., 2015), and anxious arousal (Desrosiers, Klemanski, &…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialExploring the relationship between facets of mindfulness and eating pathology in women
Lavender, J. M., Gratz, K. L., & Tull, M. T. (2011) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2011.555485 · Cited by 83
Changes in facets of mindfulness and posttraumatic stress disorder treatment outcome
Boden, M. T., Bernstein, A., Walser, R. D., Bui, L., Alvarez, J., & Bonn-Miller, M. O. (2012) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.07.011 · Cited by 78 · cited 4×
“, 2015); reductions in clinical symptoms (anxiety, depressive, and personality disorders, eating pathology and substance use, and posttraumatic stress disorder) (Adams et al., 2012; Boden et al., 2012; Compare et al., 2012; Fernandez, Wood, Stein, & Rossi, 2010; Hoge et al., 2015; Kalill, Treanor, & Roemer, 2014; Lave…”
BackgroundInfluentialMindful Awareness and Non-judging in Relation to Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms
Wahbeh, H., Lu, M. W., & Oken, B. (2011) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-011-0064-3 · Cited by 76
The relation between the five facets of mindfulness and worry in a non-clinical sample
Fisak, B., & von Lehe, A. C. (2012) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-011-0075-0 · Cited by 75 · cited 1×
“…Desrosiers et al., 2013; Hamill et al., 2015); lower worry, rumination, negative cognitions, and emotion dysregulation (Christopher & Gilbert, 2010; Fisak & Lehe, 2012; Paul et al., 2013; Reese et al., 2015); reductions in clinical symptoms (anxiety, depressive, and personality disorders, eating…”
BackgroundTomfohr, L. M., Pung, M. A., Mills, P. J., & Edwards, K. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-014-9575-4 · Cited by 67 · cited 2×
“…to more rigorously evaluate MAT, more studies are needed to test whether acceptance moderates the association of attention monitoring skills and cognitive, affective, and stress-related outcomes (e.g., Barnes & Lynn, 2010; Desrosiers et al., 2014; Eisenlohr-Moul et al., 2012; Tomfohr et al., 2015).”
BackgroundChanges in mindfulness skills and treatment response among veterans in residential PTSD treatment.
Owens, G. P., Walter, K. H., Chard, K. M., & Davis, P. A. (2012) · Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy · doi:10.1037/a0024251 · Cited by 66 · cited 2×
“For example, there is evidence that dispositional mindfulness increases following cognitive behavioral therapies (Boden et al., 2012; Owens et al., 2012), and acceptance skills are particularly important for symptom improvement following interdisciplinary acceptancebased therapy (McCracken, Vowles, & Eccleston, 2005).”
BackgroundMindfulness in Social Psychology
(2017) · doi:10.4324/9781315627700 · Cited by 65
Hamill, T. S., Pickett, S. M., Amsbaugh, H. M., & Aho, K. M. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.007 · Cited by 65 · cited 9×
“, 2015) – only correlatedwith anxiety symptoms among student participants reporting high monitoring skills (Observe) and low acceptance (Hamill et al., 2015), suggesting that in the absence of an accepting orientation toward distressing experiences, closely monitoring these experiences may exacerbate them.”
BackgroundInfluentialDaubenmier, J., Hayden, D., Chang, V., & Epel, E. (2014) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.05.012 · Cited by 62
Peters, J. R., Eisenlohr-Moul, T. A., Upton, B. T., & Baer, R. A. (2013) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.01.021 · Cited by 61
The Importance of Non-reactivity to Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms: A Case for Mindfulness
Kalill, K. S., Treanor, M., & Roemer, L. (2013) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0182-6 · Cited by 61
Evans, D. R., Eisenlohr‐Moul, T. A., Button, D. F., Baer, R. A., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2014) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12196 · Cited by 55 · cited 3×
“…interventions are less effective for those RUNNING HEAD: MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY 36 inexperienced with acceptance strategies (Blacker et al., 2012; Evans et al., 2014), and among clinical populations, an accepting orientation may be difficult to immediately adopt (Singer & Dobson, 2009).”
BackgroundLeigh, J., & Neighbors, C. (2009) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2009.28.5.650 · Cited by 53 · cited 1×
“By itself, greater emotional and body awareness has been linked with greater alcohol use (e.g., Leigh & Neighbors, 2009), but this tendency to monitor inner experiences may not be detrimental in predicting substance use when coupled with acceptance skills.”
BackgroundBack to the Basics: How Attention Monitoring and Acceptance Stimulate Positive Growth
Lindsay, E. K., & Creswell, J. D. (2015) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2015.1085265 · Cited by 40 · cited 2×
“…and acceptance in fostering psychological well-being: acceptance appears to be essential for reducing symptoms (and the grasping of positive experiences), while noticing experiences is crucial for appreciating them and building positive states (Garland et al., 2015; Lindsay & Creswell, 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-citationInzlicht, M., & Legault, L. (2014) · Cited by 40
Facets of mindfulness mediate behavioral inhibition systems and emotion dysregulation
Reese, E. D., Zielinski, M. J., & Veilleux, J. C. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.008 · Cited by 40 · cited 3×
“(Reese et al., 2015) among participants high in acceptance.”
BackgroundUnique relationships between facets of mindfulness and eating pathology among female smokers
Adams, C. E., McVay, M. A., Kinsaul, J., Benitez, L., Vinci, C., Stewart, D. W., & Copeland, A. L. (2012) · Eating Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2012.05.009 · Cited by 37 · cited 4×
“, 2015); reductions in clinical symptoms (anxiety, depressive, and personality disorders, eating pathology and substance use, and posttraumatic stress disorder) (Adams et al., 2012; Boden et al., 2012; Compare et al., 2012; Fernandez, Wood, Stein, & Rossi, 2010; Hoge et al., 2015; Kalill, Treanor, & Roemer, 2014; Lave…”
BackgroundInfluentialMotivation and Its Regulation: The Control Within
Berrios, R. (2015) · Social Psychological Review · doi:10.53841/bpsspr.2015.17.1.20 · Cited by 37
Mindfulness, Emotion Regulation, and Social Threat
Slutsky, J., Rahl-Brigman, H. A., Lindsay, E. K., & Creswell, J. D. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315627700-6 · Cited by 32
Self-citationSchoorl, M., Mil-Klinkenberg, L. V., & van der Does, W. A. J. (2014) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0346-7 · Cited by 31
Compare, A., Callus, E., & Grossi, E. (2012) · PubMed · doi:10.3275/8652 · Cited by 25 · cited 2×
“, 2015); reductions in clinical symptoms (anxiety, depressive, and personality disorders, eating pathology and substance use, and posttraumatic stress disorder) (Adams et al., 2012; Boden et al., 2012; Compare et al., 2012; Fernandez, Wood, Stein, & Rossi, 2010; Hoge et al., 2015; Kalill, Treanor, & Roemer, 2014; Lave…”
The effect of the cognitive style of acceptance on negative mood in a recovered depressed sample
Singer, A. R., & Dobson, K. S. (2009) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20418 · Cited by 24 · cited 1×
“…interventions are less effective for those RUNNING HEAD: MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY 36 inexperienced with acceptance strategies (Blacker et al., 2012; Evans et al., 2014), and among clinical populations, an accepting orientation may be difficult to immediately adopt (Singer & Dobson, 2009).”
BackgroundThe “Observing” Facet of Mindfulness Moderates Stress/Symptom Relations Only Among Meditators
Neale-Lorello, D., & Haaga, D. A. F. (2015) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-015-0396-5 · Cited by 21 · cited 1×
“Further, whereas high monitoring skills (Observe) correspond with a strong relationship between potentially stressful life events and distress symptoms among non-meditators, stressful events do not predict distress among meditators high in monitoring skills (Neale-Lorello & Haaga, 2015).”
BackgroundConsedine, N. S., & Butler, H. F. (2014) · Psychology, Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548506.2013.824596 · Cited by 19 · cited 2×
“Monitoring (Observe) has also been associated with poorer subjective health and more physician visits for psychological and physical health (Consedine & Butler, 2014); a strong tendency to monitor may increase focus on somatic sensations and intensify them unless viewed with acceptance.”
BackgroundAcceptance-Versus Change-Based Pain Management: The Role of Psychological Acceptance
Blacker, K. J., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., & Kounios, J. (2012) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445511420281 · Cited by 19 · cited 2×
“…interventions are less effective for those RUNNING HEAD: MONITOR AND ACCEPTANCE THEORY 36 inexperienced with acceptance strategies (Blacker et al., 2012; Evans et al., 2014), and among clinical populations, an accepting orientation may be difficult to immediately adopt (Singer &…”
BackgroundKlein, R. G., Dubois, S. J., Gibbons, C., Ozen, L. J., Marshall, S., Cullen, N. K., & Bédard, M. (2015) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 16
Flagged first, then by citations
17 of the 152 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Pickert, 2014, The mindful revolution, Time
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lindsay, E. K., Young, S., Brown, K. W., Smyth, J. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1813588116 · Cited by 344
“More broadly, mindfulness skills may initiate ripple effects (31), with benefits extending to a range of personal and social outcomes that can improve health (16, 32).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCarpenter, J. K., Conroy, K., Gomez, A. F., Curren, L. C., & Hofmann, S. G. (2019) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101785 · Cited by 342
Brief mindfulness training for negative affectivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schumer, M. C., Lindsay, E. K., & Creswell, J. D. (2018) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000324 · Cited by 316
“By fostering awareness and nonreactivity toward momentary affective experiences, mindfulness alters how one relates to negative affect; unpleasant and stressful experiences are allowed to arise and pass without interference (Brown, Ryan, & Creswell, 2007; Lindsay & Creswell, 2017).”
Self-citationUnderstanding How Virtual Reality Can Support Mindfulness Practice: Mixed Methods Study
Seabrook, E., Kelly, R., Foley, F., Theiler, S., Thomas, N., Wadley, G., & Nedeljkovic, M. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16106 · Cited by 262
“However, mindfulness requires conscious effort and can be difficult to maintain, particularly for novice meditators who already expend greater cognitive resources to control their self-regulatory skills [7-9].”
BackgroundMindfulness Training and Physical Health: Mechanisms and Outcomes
Creswell, J. D., Lindsay, E. K., Villalba, D. K., & Chin, B. (2019) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000675 · Cited by 252
“Although we have previously described these theoretical perspectives (5,12,40), here we provide some updates and links to biobehavioral processes relevant to biobehavioral medicine researchers.”
InfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindsay, E. K., & Creswell, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lindsay, Emily K.
- Creswell, J. David
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 51
- Pages
- 48-59
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5195874
- OpenAlex
- W2548953146
- Cited by
- 919
- References
- 152
- Citations by year
- 2026: 141 · 2025: 142 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 16
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- KiltHub Repository
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM081760)
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R21AT008493, R01AT008685)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Keywords
- mindfulness training, attention monitoring, acceptance, trait mindfulness, emotional reactivity, negative affectivity, stress, cognitive function
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Awareness, Humans, Meditation, Mindfulness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review