Cited by 124DNA Repair MechanismsGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

Systemic DNA damage responses in aging and diseases

Open access
Ribezzo, Flavia, Shiloh, Yosef, Schumacher, Björn·2016·Seminars in Cancer Biology

Abstract

The genome is constantly attacked by a variety of genotoxic insults. The causal role for DNA damage in aging and cancer is exemplified by genetic defects in DNA repair that underlie a broad spectrum of acute and chronic human disorders that are characterized by developmental abnormalities, premature aging, and cancer predisposition. The disease symptoms are typically tissue-specific with uncertain genotype-phenotype correlation. The cellular DNA damage response (DDR) has been extensively investigated ever since yeast geneticists discovered DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms, several decades ago. In recent years, it has become apparent that not only cell-autonomous but also systemic DNA damage responses determine the outcome of genome instability in organisms. Understanding the mechanisms of non-cell-autonomous DNA damage responses will provide important new insights into the role of genome instability in human aging and a host of diseases including cancer and might better explain the complex phenotypes caused by genome instability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.12.005

Cites

149 of 149 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ribezzo, F., Shiloh, Y., & Schumacher, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Schumacher, Björn
Venue
Seminars in Cancer Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
37-38
Pages
26-35
ISSN
1044-579X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2227508297
Cited by
116
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seminars in Cancer Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • European Research Council (260383)
  • Marie Curie (316354, 316390, 316964)
  • German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (GIF 1104-68.11/2010)
  • Deutsche Krebshilfe (109453)
  • Bundesministerium für Forschung und Bildung (FKZ0315893A-B)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
DNA damage response, aging, genomic instability, DNA repair deficiency, premature aging, cancer susceptibility, genotoxicity, DNA damage checkpoint, cancer
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Mutation, Neoplasms, Cellular Senescence, Genomic Instability, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, Genetic Association Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review