The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet; none of the 24 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences.
Open accessAbstract
One of life's great challenges is successfully regulating emotions. Do some emotion regulation strategies have more to recommend them than others? According to Gross's (1998, Review of General Psychology, 2, 271-299) process model of emotion regulation, strategies that act early in the emotion-generative process should have a different profile of consequences than strategies that act later on. This review focuses on two commonly used strategies for down-regulating emotion. The first, reappraisal, comes early in the emotion-generative process. It consists of changing the way a situation is construed so as to decrease its emotional impact. The second, suppression, comes later in the emotion-generative process. It consists of inhibiting the outward signs of inner feelings. Experimental and individual-difference studies find reappraisal is often more effective than suppression. Reappraisal decreases emotion experience and behavioral expression, and has no impact on memory. By contrast, suppression decreases behavioral expression, but fails to decrease emotion experience, and actually impairs memory. Suppression also increases physiological responding for suppressors and their social partners. This review concludes with a consideration of five important directions for future research on emotion regulation processes.
Checked 2026-10-05 · 1 reference not checked yet
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 24 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By contrast, suppression decreases behavioral expression, but fails to decrease emotion experience, and actually impairs memory.”
- Also stated in: § Affective Consequences of Reappraisal and Suppression: Experimental Data · p. 4 · plain
“Also unlike suppression, reappraisal decreased disgust experience, whereas suppression had no effect on disgust experience.”
- Also stated in: § Affective Consequences of Reappraisal and Suppression: Experimental Data · p. 5 · plain
“It is noteworthy that whereas suppressing negative emotionexpressive behavior has no discernible impact on negative emotion experience ~ e.g., disgust, sadness, embarrassment ! , suppressing positive emotion-expressive behavior does have an impact on positive emotion experience ~ e.g., amusement ! .”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Affective Consequences of Reappraisal and Suppression: Experimental Data · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By contrast, reappraisal had no impact on verbal memory.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Relations between suppression and negative emotion expression also followed expectations, with suppression being associated with lesser negative emotion expressive behavior.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reappraisal, by contrast, was associated with greater positive emotion experience and expression, and lesser negative emotion experience and expression.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reappraisal decreases emotion experience and behavioral expression, and has no impact on memory.”
- Also stated in: § Affective Consequences of Reappraisal and Suppression: Experimental Data · p. 4 · plain
“Also unlike suppression, reappraisal decreased disgust experience, whereas suppression had no effect on disgust experience.”
- Also stated in: § Affective Consequences of Reappraisal and Suppression: Individual-Difference Data · p. 5 · plain
“Reappraisal, by contrast, was associated with greater positive emotion experience and expression, and lesser negative emotion experience and expression.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Affective Consequences of Reappraisal and Suppression: Experimental Data · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we found that individuals who scored higher on either of the two suppression scales reported having worse memory that those who scored lower on these suppression scales”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By contrast, suppression decreases behavioral expression, but fails to decrease emotion experience, and actually impairs memory.”
- Also stated in: § Cognitive Consequences of Reappraisal and Suppression: Experimental Data · p. 6 · hedged
“As predicted, results indicated that suppression led to reliable decrements ~ compared to the control condition ! in both objective memory and memory confidence ratings.”
- Also stated in: § Cognitive Consequences of Reappraisal and Suppression: Experimental Data · p. 6 · plain
“As predicted, suppression participants performed less well on the verbal memory test than control participants.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Cognitive Consequences of Reappraisal and Suppression: Experimental Data · p. 6 · hedged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They also performed worse on an objective memory test in which they were asked to recall events they had listed in a daily diary 1 week earlier.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unlike suppression, however, reappraisal had no observable consequences in terms of sympathetic activation of the cardiovascular or electrodermal systems.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, suppression's effect on verbal memory was just as pronounced for the low-emotion as for the high-emotion slides, suggesting that it is the process of engaging in suppression that is cognitively costly, rather than the amount of emotion that is actually suppressed.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 28
- Probably not a substantial claim. 6
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Table 1. Cognitive Consequences of Reappraisal and Suppression (Controlling for Neuroticism and Social Desirability)”
- Also stated in: § Cognitive Consequences of Reappraisal and Suppression: Experimental Data · p. 6 · plain
“| Self-reported | - .31 * | - .23 * | .09 |”
- Also stated in: § Cognitive Consequences of Reappraisal and Suppression: Experimental Data · p. 6 · plain
“| Objective | - .33 * | - .27 * | .05 |”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Cognitive Consequences of Reappraisal and Suppression: Experimental Data · p. 6 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Findings regarding suppression and negative emotion experience were mixed, showing either no effects or positive effects, that is, the more individuals said they suppressed, the more negative emotion they said they felt.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In each case, suppression was associated with negative outcomes, whereas reappraisal was associated with positive outcomes.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whereas suppress participants showed greater increases in sympathetic activation than watch or reappraise subjects, these latter two groups did not differ from one another.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In each case, suppression was associated with negative outcomes, whereas reappraisal was associated with positive outcomes.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Gross and Levenson ~ 1997 ! found a suppression effect for amusement experience both in a context that predominantly elicited amusement ~ an amusement film ! and in a context in which there were lower levels of amusement ~ a sadness film that evoked a bit of secondary amusement ! .”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Gross and Levenson, 1997 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As expected, suppression decreased nonemotional behavior, and no differences were found between suppress and watch subjects for any of the physiological or experiential variables.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, however, emotions do not force us to respond in certain ways, they only make it more likely we will do so.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Individuals with schizophrenia have decreased emotion-expressive behavior compared with controls, but comparable levels of emotion experience”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kring & Neale, 1996 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“reappraisal seems to decrease negative emotion experience and expression while either having no impact or actually increasing positive emotion experience and expression”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These latter changes cohere theoretically, and can be described in terms of 'increased sympathetic activation of the cardiovascular system.'”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such monitoring requires a continual outlay of cognitive resources, reducing the resources available for processing events so that they can later be remembered.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Suppression requires self-monitoring and self-corrective action throughout an emotional event.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The logic of this comparative design hinges on the premise that whereas antecedent-focused forms of emotion regulation ~ such as reappraisal ! principally concern whether or not emotion response tendencies are triggered , response-focused strategies ~ such as suppression ! concern how emotion response tendencies are modulated once they have been triggered .”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Suppression also was associated with poorer social support and lesser use of instrumental and emotional social support coping.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gross and John ~ in press !
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“reappraisal led to increased activation of lateral prefrontal regions important for cognitive control, and to decreases in activation of the amygdala and medial orbitofrontal cortex”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ochsner, Bunge, Gross, & Gabrieli, 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Patients with schizophrenia also have well-characterized deficits in social functioning, and lead those interacting with them to feel uncomfortable”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Krause, Steimer, Sanger-Alt, & Wagner, 1989 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“suppression seems to be a blunt instrument-one that decreases both negative and positive emotion-expressive behavior, thereby masking important social signals that would otherwise be available to social interaction partners”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the ongoing requirement of monitoring one's own facial expressions and vocal signals could distract the suppressing individual and make them less responsive to the emotional cues of their partner”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“suggest that whereas suppression is cognitively costly, reappraisal is not”
- Also stated in: § Concluding Comment · p. 9 · hedged
“Suppression also consumes cognitive resources, impairing memory for information presented during the emotion regulation period. Reappraisal, by contrast, appears to have no such cognitive consequences.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The suppression and reappraisal constructs measured as habitual individual differences are the same constructs manipulated in the laboratory experiments.
- Also stated in: § Concluding Comment · p. 9 · hedged
In the paper
“Similarly, Harris ~ 2001 ! has found that suppressing visible signs of embarrassment leads to enhanced blood pressure responses, but does not affect emotion experience reports.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Harris, 2001 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Compared with the no soundtrack condition, participants who heard the soundtrack had lower skin conductance levels and more pleasant mood ratings.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lazarus & Alfert, 1964 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Theorists since Darwin ~ 1872 0 1998 ! have maintained that emotionexpressive behavior plays an important role in facilitating social interactions.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Campos, Mumme, Kermoian, & Campos, 1994 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“over half of the nonsubstance related Axis I clinical disorders and all of the Axis II personality disorders involve some form of emotion dysregulation”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Gross & Levenson, 1997 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Individuals increase, maintain, and decrease negative and positive emotions ~ Parrott, 1993 ! .”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Parrott, 1993
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Suppression also increases electrodermal responding and blood pressure, and decreases finger pulse amplitude, finger temperature, and pulse transit times.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gross, 1998a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Gross & Levenson, 1993, 1997
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This would make costly self-regulation unnecessary, leaving memory intact.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken together, these findings concerning suppression suggest decreases in positive emotion experience, but the physiological effects of suppression are not clear.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“suggesting that the cognitive costs of suppression are due to the verbal demands of self-instructions issued during the course of suppression ~ e.g., 'I need to keep my face still' ! .”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Suppression requires self-monitoring and self-corrective action throughout an emotional event.
In the paper
“Diverse forms of self-regulation result in similar kinds of 'ego depletion,' which suggests that a common resource may be consumed in diverse forms of regulation”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Baumeister, Bratslavsky, Muraven, & Tice, 1998 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“suppression appears to have little impact on negative emotion experience, while decreasing positive emotion experience”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Suppression requires self-monitoring and self-corrective action throughout an emotional event.
“Suppression is a form of emotion regulation that requires selfmonitoring and self-corrective action throughout an emotional event.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Emotions involve coordinated behavioral, experiential, and physiological response tendencies.
“In either case, emotions call forth a coordinated set of behavioral, experiential, and physiological response tendencies that together influence how we respond to perceived challenges and opportunities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The personal meaning assigned to a situation strongly influences which experiential, behavioral, and physiological response tendencies are generated.
“The personal meaning that is assigned to the situation is crucial because it powerfully influences which experiential, behavioral, and physiological response tendencies will be generated in that particular situation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The suppression and reappraisal constructs measured as habitual individual differences are the same constructs manipulated in the laboratory experiments.
“These individual-difference findings converge with the results of our experimental studies, and suggest that whereas suppression is cognitively costly, reappraisal is not.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“In the last two decades clinicians have shown that mindfulness training can improve emotional disorders [74] and negative mood [75] and reduce physiological responses such as skin conductance [76] and amygdala activity [67].”
From Mindful emotion regulation: Exploring the neurocognitive mechanisms behind mindfulness (2015) · cites this paper as [74]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“some models of emotions distinguish between antecedent-focused and response-focused emotion regulation strategies, based on the differential processing of internal and external emotional cues [65–68].”
From The empirical status of the "new wave" of cognitive behavioral therapy (2010) · cites this paper as [66]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In addition, the recognition performance of emotional stimuli seems to be unaffected by emotional reappraisal (see [9,28] but see [29]), whereas suppression leads to impaired recognition [8,9].”
From Effects of differential strategies of emotion regulation (2019) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We used similar instructions as Gross and colleagues to induce suppression (e.g., Gross & Levenson, 1997), and we replicated their earlier findings, suggesting that our experimental manipulation worked (Gross, 1998, 2002; Gross & Levenson, 1997).”
From How to handle anxiety: The effects of reappraisal, acceptance, and suppression strategies on anxious arousal (2009) · cites this paper as Gross, 2002
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Laboratory based studies of cognitive change report psychological benefits from instructing participants to reappraise emotional stimuli or tasks in a manner designed to diminish personal identification and increase objectivity before the individuals encounter the stimuli or task”
From United we stand: emphasizing commonalities across cognitive-behavioral therapies. (2013) · cites this paper as Gross, 2002
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“to achieve a common goal of behavioral adaptation, CBTs share change principles that target responding at different points along an emotional trajectory (Gross, 2002), including context engagement which can be seen as encompassing therapeutic processes of behavioral exposure and behavioral activation; attention change, which can be seen as encompassing therapeutic processes of attention training”
From United we stand: emphasizing commonalities across cognitive-behavioral therapies. (2013) · cites this paper as Gross, 2002
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Within this framework, the process model differentiates emotion regulation strategies according to the time they intervene in the unfolding emotional response: we can distinguish between antecedent-focused strategies, which are used before the emotion response tendencies become active, and response-focused strategies, which are used once the response tendencies are generated [56,60,61].”
From Interoceptive Ability and Emotion Regulation in Mind–Body Interventions: An Integrative Review (2024) · cites this paper as [60]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Cognitive reappraisal is an effective emotion regulation strategy (Gross, 2002), that has been demonstrated to facilitate emotion regulation in healthy and psychiatric cohorts.”
From Rt-fMRI neurofeedback-guided cognitive reappraisal training modulates amygdala responsivity in posttraumatic stress disorder (2020) · cites this paper as Gross, 2002
In the citing paper
“Emotion regulation therapy (ERT) is one approach to combining CBTs and MBIs that addresses sequencing by targeting the refractory negative emotionality and resulting negative self-referentiality that characterizes distress disorders [75] by first addressing attention change techniques”
From All together now: utilizing common functional change principles to unify cognitive behavioral and mindfulness-based therapies (2019) · cites this paper as [81]
In the citing paper
“Taken together, this suggests that the generation of compassion in response to distressing situations is distinct from other emotion regulation strategies, such as suppression or reappraisal, which involve an active downregulation of negative affect (Gross, 2002).”
From Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training (2014) · cites this paper as Gross, 2002
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Year of the Butler study differs from its reference entry
MinorThe text cites the Butler and colleagues social-interaction study as 2002, while the matching reference entry gives 2001.
“We asked unacquainted pairs of women to watch an upsetting film, and then discuss their reactions ~ Butler, Egloff, Wilhelm, Smith, & Gross, 2002 ! .”
“Butler, E. A., Egloff, B., Wilhelm, F. H., Smith, N. C., & Gross, J. J. ~ 2001 ! . The social consequences of emotion regulation . Manuscript under review.”
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
The expression of the emotions in man and animals.
Darwin, C. D. (1872) · J. Murray eBooks · doi:10.1037/10001-000 · Cited by 12,120
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1978) · Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4 · Cited by 10,586
The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review
Gross, J. J. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271 · Cited by 9,916
Self-citationPsychological stress and the coping process
Lazarus, R. S. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,164
Murray, C. J. L., & López, A. D. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07492-2 · Cited by 7,007
Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.5.1252 · Cited by 5,312
Gross, J. J. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.224 · Cited by 4,671
Self-citationProgress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.46.8.819 · Cited by 3,272
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Buck, R. W. ~ 1979 ! . Individual differences in non-verbal sending accuracy and electrodermal responding: The externalizing-internalizing dimension. In R. Rosenthal ~ Ed. ! , Skill in non-verbal communication ~ pp. 140170 ! . Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
- Butler, E. A., Egloff, B., Wilhelm, F. H., Smith, N. C., & Gross, J. J. ~ 2001 ! . The social consequences of emotion regulation . Manuscript under review.
- Clore, G. L. ~ 1994 ! . Why emotions vary in intensity. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson ~ Eds. ! , The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions ~ pp. 386-393 ! . New York: Oxford University Press.
- Frijda, N. H. ~ 1986 ! . The emotions . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. ~ in press ! . Wise emotion regulation. In L.
- Head, H. ~ 1921 ! . Release function in the nervous system. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biology , 92B , 184-209.
- Jones, H. E. ~ 1950 ! . The study of patterns of emotion expression. In M. Reymert ~ Ed. ! , Feelings and emotions ~ pp. 161-168 ! . New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Leary, M. R. ~ 1986 ! . Affective and behavioral consequences of shyness: Implications for theory, measurement, and research. In W. H. Jones & J. M. Cheek & S. R. Briggs ~ Eds. ! , Shyness: Perspectives on research and treatment ~ pp. 27-38 ! . New York: Plenum Press.
- Levenson, R. W. ~ 1994 ! . Human emotions: A functional view. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson ~ Eds. ! , The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions ~ pp. 123-126 ! . New York: Oxford University Press.
- Mauss, I. B., & Gross, J. J. ~ in press ! . Emotion suppression and cardiovascular disease: Is hiding feelings bad for your heart? In L. R. Temoshok, I. Nyklicek, & A. Vingerhoets ~ Eds. ! , Emotions in health promotion and disease . London: Harwood Academic Press.
- Ochsner, K. N., Bunge, S. A., Gross, J. J., Gabrieli, J. D. E. ~ 2002 ! . The neural bases of reappraisal . Manuscript under review.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 4,870
Is Timing Everything? Temporal Considerations in Emotion Regulation
Sheppes, G., & Gross, J. J. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868310395778 · Cited by 473
“Affectively, suppression but not reappraisal leaves negative emotional experience unchanged (see Gross, 2002, for a review), increases sympathetic nervous system activation (e.g., Gross, 1998a; Gross & Levenson, 1993, 1997), and increases activation in emotiongenerative brain regions (Goldin,…”
BackgroundSelf-citationRegulation of emotional responses elicited by threat-related stimuli
Eippert, F., Veit, R., Weiskopf, N., Erb, M., Birbaumer, N., & Anders, S. (2007) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20291 · Cited by 419
“taining, or increasing) of positive and negative emotional reactions is termed emotion regulation [Gross, 2002].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-Leadership: A Multilevel Review
Stewart, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310383911 · Cited by 541
“In the psychology literature, Gross (1998, 2002) has introduced a modal process model of emotion regulation (ER) that elucidates different classes of emotional self-regulation.”
BackgroundInfluentialPutting feelings into words: Affect labeling as implicit emotion regulation
Torre, J. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2018) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073917742706 · Cited by 402
“…2012; Ray et al., 2010; Urry, van Reekum, Johnstone, & Davidson, 2009); and through observation of emotion-related behaviors such as overt physical expression of emotion (Gross, 1998a, 2002), risk-taking (Park & Lee, 2011), and reaction times during interpersonal evaluation (Blechert et al., 2012).”
BackgroundChang, M. (2013) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9335-0 · Cited by 499
“Suppression has little impact on unpleasant emotions, and it also ‘‘consumes cognitive resources, impairing memory for information presented during the emotion regulation period’’ (Gross 2002, p. 289).”
BackgroundFear is only as deep as the mind allows
Diekhof, E. K., Geier, K., Falkai, P., & Gruber, O. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.073 · Cited by 413
Interpersonal emotion regulation as a mechanism of social support in depression
Marroquín, B. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.09.005 · Cited by 414
The development of social cognition in adolescence: An integrated perspective
Kilford, E. J., Garrett, E., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.016 · Cited by 412
“Emotion regulation strategies play a key role in mastering complex social interactions and the emotions they evoke (Gross and John, 2003; Gross, 2002; Ochsner et al., 2002), an important component of which are social cognitive skills.”
BackgroundHedonic and instrumental motives in anger regulation
Tamir, M., Mitchell, C., & Gross, J. J. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02088.x · Cited by 412
“Emotion regulation refers to individuals’ attempts to influence their emotions (Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEliminating Explicit and Implicit Biases in Health Care: Evidence and Research Needs
Vela, M. B., Erondu, A. I., Smith, N. A., Peek, M. E., Woodruff, J. N., & Chin, M. H. (2022) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052620-103528 · Cited by 426
An Italian Adaptation of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Balzarotti, S., John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2010) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000009 · Cited by 446
“Given that these two emotion-regulation strategies function at different points in the emotion-generative process, they also have different implications for various aspects of an individual’s personal and social life (Gross, 2002; Gross & John, 2003; Lopes, Salovey, & Straus, 2003).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDesrosiers, A., Vine, V., Klemanski, D. H., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2013) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22124 · Cited by 392
Emotion-focused therapy for depression.
Greenberg, L. S., & Watson, J. C. (2006) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11286-000 · Cited by 430
From anatomy to function: the role of the somatosensory cortex in emotional regulation
Kropf, E., Syan, S. K., Minuzzi, L., & Frey, B. N. (2018) · Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1590/1516-4446-2018-0183 · Cited by 404
Shiota, M. N., & LEVENSON, R. W. (2009) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0017896 · Cited by 408
“Among emotion regulation strategies, cognitive reappraisal offers many benefits, appearing effective in the short-term and psychologically healthy in the long-term (Gross, 2002; Gross & John, 2003).”
Turning the knots in your stomach into bows: reappraising arousal improves performance on the GRE
Jamieson, J. P., Mendes, W. B., Blackstock, E., & Schmader, T. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.015 · Cited by 376
“More specifically with regards to reappraisal, Gross argues that appraisal processes occur early in the emotion-generative process, and the downstream outcome (the experienced emotion) is most easily altered by changing appraisals of the meaning of internal states (Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundThe functional neuroanatomy of reappraisal: Time matters
Kalisch, R. (2009) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.06.003 · Cited by 379
“Reappraisal is a conscious change in the way an emotional stimulus is interpreted, initiated in order to change its emotion-eliciting character (Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialAllostasis and the human brain: Integrating models of stress from the social and life sciences.
Ganzel, B. L., Morris, P., & Wethington, E. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0017773 · Cited by 415
“For example, the substantial psychosocial literature on the taxonomy and function of coping (e.g., Bandura, 1977; Gross, 2002; Lazarus, 1966; Scherer, Schor, & Johnstone, 2001) has provided grist for hypothesis generation that has been highly fruitful in understanding the neural mechanisms…”
Best practices for stress measurement: how to measure psychological stress in health research
Crosswell, A. D., & Lockwood, K. G. (2020) · Health Psychology Open · doi:10.1177/2055102920933072 · Cited by 372
“Psychological stress responses include specific emotions triggered by the stressor, as well as efforts to regulate that emotion (Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundZilverstand, A., Parvaz, M. A., & Goldstein, R. Z. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.009 · Cited by 360
“Use of cognitive reappraisal affects the early stages of the emotion-generative process and therefore decreases both the experience and the behavioral expression of emotion, while other strategies acting later in the emotion-generative process, such as suppression, affect only behavioral expression without changing th…”
BackgroundSame situation--Different emotions: How appraisals shape our emotions.
Siemer, M., Mauss, I. B., & Gross, J. J. (2007) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.592 · Cited by 408
“Confirming evidence about the central role of cognitive appraisals in emotions comes from the growing emotion regulation literature (Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAttachment and emotion regulation in substance addictions and behavioral addictions
Estévez, A., Jáuregui, P., Sánchez-Marcos, I., López-González, H., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.6.2017.086 · Cited by 371
“Such learning reinforces emotion regulation (i.e., individuals’ ability to modify which emotions they feel, as well as when and how such emotions are experienced and expressed) (Gross, 2002; Mikulincer, Shaver, Sapir-Lavid, & Avihou-Kanza, 2009).”
BackgroundExtending animal models of fear conditioning to humans
Delgado, M. R., Olsson, A., & Phelps, E. A. (2006) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.01.006 · Cited by 366
“Another study by Ochsner et al. (2002) investigated the neural correlates of reappraisal, a type of cognitive strategy that proposes that an individual can change their emotional reaction by reevaluating the situation in a less negative context (Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundEmotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty
Heilman, R. M., Crişan, L. G., Houser, D., Miclea, M., & Miu, A. C. (2010) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0018489 · Cited by 369
Fox, H. C., Hong, K. A., & Sinha, R. (2008) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.10.002 · Cited by 366
“Common definitions of ER relate to the way in which humans control their experience and expression of emotion under distress by employing strategies such as suppression, repression and cognitive reappraisal (Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundThe Mindful Brain and Emotion Regulation in Mood Disorders
Farb, N. A. S., Anderson, A. K., & Segal, Z. V. (2012) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674371205700203 · Cited by 366
“…to relevant aspects of experience in a nonjudgmental manner” (Ludwig & Kabat-Zinn, 2008) and differs from conventional emotional regulation strategies such as cognitive reappraisal, which relies on memory and evaluation to re-interpret negative experiences (Gross, 2002; Ochsner et al., 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialEmotion Regulation in Binge Eating Disorder: A Review
Dingemans, A., Danner, U., & Parks, M. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9111274 · Cited by 352
“Although the number of emotion regulation strategies is potentially limitless [42], examples of both adaptive and maladaptive strategies include reappraisal, problem solving, acceptance, avoidance, rumination and suppression [41].”
BackgroundInfluentialEmotion processing and regulation in bipolar disorder: a review
Townsend, J. D., & Altshuler, L. L. (2012) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01021.x · Cited by 370
Emotion Regulation in Depression
Joormann, J., & Vanderlind, W. M. (2014) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702614536163 · Cited by 390
Training the Emotional Brain: Improving Affective Control through Emotional Working Memory Training
Schweizer, S., Grahn, J. A., Hampshire, A., Mobbs, D., & Dalgleish, T. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2593-12.2013 · Cited by 388
From a distance: Implications of spontaneous self-distancing for adaptive self-reflection.
Ayduk, Ö., & Kross, E. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019205 · Cited by 347
The neural correlates of sex differences in emotional reactivity and emotion regulation
Domes, G., Schulze, L., Böttger, M., Grossmann, A., Hauenstein, K., Wirtz, P. H., Heinrichs, M., & Herpertz, S. C. (2010) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20903 · Cited by 347
“Emotional responding on the behavioral as well as the physiological level has been conceptualized as a product of both emotional reactivity and cognitive processes of emotion regulation, including reappraisal and suppression [Gross 1998, 2002].”
BackgroundEmotional display rules as work unit norms: A multilevel analysis of emotional labor among nurses.
Diefendorff, J. M., Erickson, R. J., Grandey, A. A., & Dahling, J. J. (2011) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021725 · Cited by 349
“However, the direction of effect chosen here is consistent with models of emotional labor (Grandey, 2000) and has been demonstrated in experimental research (e.g., Gross, 2002).”
Sex differences in emotional and physiological responses to the Trier Social Stress Test
Kelly, M. M., Tyrka, A. R., Anderson, G. M., Price, L. H., & Carpenter, L. L. (2007) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.02.003 · Cited by 377
Emotion regulation in autism spectrum disorder: Where we are and where we need to go
Cai, R. Y., Richdale, A. L., Uljarević, M., Dissanayake, C., & Samson, A. C. (2018) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1968 · Cited by 347
“Generally, it is agreed that healthy ER is characterized by the successful up-regulation of positive emotions and down-regulation of negative emotions [Gross, 2002; Giuliani, McRae, & Gross, 2008; Ochsner et al., 2004].”
BackgroundKim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005 · Cited by 344
“However, seeing others’ frustration may have helped them regulate their emotion of frustration since social interactions are critical in one’s emotional experience (Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundDandeneau, S. D., Baldwin, M. W., Baccus, J. R., Sakellaropoulo, M., & Pruessner, J. C. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.651 · Cited by 341
The Science of Cognitive Therapy
Hofmann, S. G., Asmundson, G. J. G., & Beck, A. T. (2013) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2009.01.007 · Cited by 366
Detecting, Preventing, and Mitigating Online Firestorms in Brand Communities
Herhausen, D., Ludwig, S., Grewal, D., Wulf, J., & Schögel, M. (2019) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242918822300 · Cited by 374
“Research on emotion regulation strategies further indicates that some stimuli may be too emotionally intense for an empathic response to suffice, and instead, receivers may seek explanations to reappraise the situation (Gross 2002).”
BackgroundWiech, K., Kalisch, R., Weiskopf, N., Pleger, B., Stephan, K. E., & Dolan, R. J. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2568-06.2006 · Cited by 323
“Emotion regulation research has found ample evidence that a voluntary and consciously controlled form of reappraisal (reinterpretation) can attenuate aversive emotional reactions (Gross, 2002), including peripheral and neural reactivity to pain (Kalisch et al., 2005).”
BackgroundTaxer, J. L., & Frenzel, A. C. (2015) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.03.003 · Cited by 334
“The present research concentrates on the response-focused strategy of suppression (Gross, 1998a, 2002), referred to here as the hidden emotion facet of teachers' emotional lives.”
BackgroundMethodTeachers' Emotion Regulation and Classroom Management
Sutton, R. E., Mudrey-Camino, R., & Knight, C. C. (2009) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405840902776418 · Cited by 328
“Currently, emotions are considered to be processes involving multiple components arising from experiential, behavioral, and physiologi- cal systems; emotion regulation involves unconscious and conscious attempts to modify any of these processes (Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodDörfel, D., Lamke, J.-P., Hummel, F., Wagner, U., Erk, S., & Walter, H. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.051 · Cited by 322
“…has not fully unfolded and they try to alter the negativity of an event itself, whereas response-focused strategies such as Expressive Suppression often fail in controlling the emotional experience since they are initiated later in the emotion-generative process (for a review see Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundGarland, E. L., Gaylord, S. A., Boettiger, C. A., & Howard, M. O. (2010) · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs · doi:10.1080/02791072.2010.10400690 · Cited by 319
“…(Purdon, 1999), by increasing the rate, intensity, and accessibility of the very thoughts and moods it is directed against (Wegner, Schneider, Carter, & White 1987), as well as intensifying sympathetic nervous system activity (Gross 2002; Gross & Levenson 1993; Wenzlaff & Wegner 2000).”
BackgroundApplication of the Stimuli-Organism-Response (S-O-R) Framework to Online Shopping Behavior
Chen, P., & Kim, Y. G. (2014) · Journal of Internet Commerce · doi:10.1080/15332861.2014.944437 · Cited by 327
“Finally, the study shows that in China’s online market, attitude toward online shopping can play a mediating role in the relationship between the internal influences of the stimulus and repurchase intention, as extant studies have shown (e.g., Ajzen 1991; Gross 2002; Kim and Park 2005; Park et al. 2013).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe Basic Empathy Scale in Adults (BES-A): Factor structure of a revised form.
Carré, A., Stefaniak, N., D’Ambrosio, F., Bensalah, L., & Besche‐Richard, C. (2013) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0032297 · Cited by 358
“Alternatively, this emotion regulation strategy could be considered to be a partially efficient way to react to emotional situations (Gross, 2002) when compared with complete emotional appraisal.”
BackgroundInterpersonal Emotion Regulation Model of Mood and Anxiety Disorders
Hofmann, S. G. (2014) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-014-9620-1 · Cited by 320
“The intrapersonal model of emotion regulation (e.g., Gross 2002; Gross and John 2003; Gross and Levenson 1997) has made an important contribution to the clinical field (Aldao et al. 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSheppes, G., & Meiran, N. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167207305537 · Cited by 313
“…(e.g., Nolen-Hoeksema, 1987, 1991); (d) cognitive change strategies such as cognitive reappraisal, which is defined as construing a potentially emotion-eliciting situation in nonemotional terms (e.g., Gross, 2002; Gross & John, 2003; Richards & Gross, 2000); and (e) response modulation strategies.”
BackgroundIndividual differences in trait rumination and the neural systems supporting cognitive reappraisal
RAY, R. D., OCHSNER, K. N., COOPER, J. C., ROBERTSON, E. R., GABRIELI, J. D. E., & GROSS, J. J. (2005) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.5.2.156 · Cited by 316
“More generally, cognitive reappraisal has been shown to have salutary effects on experience, physiological responding, and behavior, without some of the costs associated with other regulatory strategies, such as expressive suppression ( Gross, 1998, 2002 ).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCognitive dysfunction in depression: Neurocircuitry and new therapeutic strategies
Murrough, J. W., Iacoviello, B., Neumeister, A., Charney, D. S., & Iosifescu, D. V. (2011) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2011.06.006 · Cited by 307
“cognitive reappraisal, as critical to psychological health and wellbeing (Gross, 2002; Ochsner & Gross, 2005).”
Association of neural and physiological responses during voluntary emotion suppression
Ohira, H., Nomura, M., Ichikawa, N., Isowa, T., Iidaka, T., Sato, A., Fukuyama, S., Nakajima, T., & Yamada, J. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.047 · Cited by 318
Arch, J. J., & Craske, M. G. (2008) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00137.x · Cited by 310
“That is, cognitive reframing, a core CBT cognitive restructuring approach, generally decreases the intensity and behavioral expression of negative emotion and does not produce the same counterproductive effects as suppression (see Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundEmotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: More than a wives’ tale.
Bloch, L., Haase, C. M., & LEVENSON, R. W. (2013) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0034272 · Cited by 377
“…myriad other indicators of positive social functioning including adaptive attachment style, greater peer-rated likeability and sharing of emotions (Gross, 2002; Gross & John, 2003; John & Gross, 2004), greater social support, closeness to others, and social satisfaction (Salvatore, Kuo, Steele,…”
BackgroundInfluentialIntegration of Emotion and Cognitive Control
Gray, J. R. (2004) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00272.x · Cited by 305
“An integrated perspective strongly implies not only that emotion should be able to modulate cognitive control, but also the reverse: that cognitive control should be able to modulate emotion (cf. Gross, 2002; Salovey et al., 2002).”
BackgroundOverlapping neural systems mediating extinction, reversal and regulation of fear
Schiller, D., & Delgado, M. R. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.002 · Cited by 294
Anxiety Reduction through Detachment: Subjective, Physiological, and Neural Effects
Kalisch, R., Wiech, K., Critchley, H. D., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. P., Oakley, D. A., Allen, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/0898929054021184 · Cited by 303
“&”
BackgroundInfluentialFacial expression analysis with AFFDEX and FACET: A validation study
Stöckli, S., Schulte‐Mecklenbeck, M., Borer, S., & Samson, A. C. (2017) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0996-1 · Cited by 333
“Sometimes it can be useful for people to hide or suppress facial expressions in order to portray external facial expressions that don’t reflect internal feeling states (Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundOchsner, K. N. (2008) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.04.024 · Cited by 336
Grant, J. A., Courtemanche, J., & Rainville, P. (2011) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.006 · Cited by 297
“Such an ability could have widespread and profound implications for pain and emotion regulation as well as cognitive control; theories of which postulate is achieved though frontal activation [17,24,38], rather than disengagement as suggested here.”
BackgroundNeuroscience of human social interactions and adult attachment style
Vrtička, P., & Vuilleumier, P. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00212 · Cited by 285
“Moreover, an influential theory of emotion regulation theory (Gross, 1998, 2002) has emphasized different types of strategies (e.g., antecedent- and response-focused), but the latter do not make specific reference to interpersonal emotion situations.”
BackgroundEgloff, B., Schmukle, S. C., Burns, L. R., & Schwerdtfeger, A. R. (2006) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.356 · Cited by 286
“In contrast, reappraisal—as an antecedentfocused regulation strategy—should take effect before the emotion response tendencies have been triggered (Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMindfulness and acceptance in the treatment of disordered eating
Baer, R. A., Fischer, S., & Huss, D. B. (2005) · Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1007/s10942-005-0015-9 · Cited by 283
“In fact, laboratory studies of suppression of thoughts and emotions show that the more one tries to avoid these phenomena, the more likely one is to experience them (Clark, Ball, & Pape, 1991; Gross, 2002; Gross & John, 2003).”
BackgroundCarson, J. W., Carson, K. M., Jones, K. D., Bennett, R. M., Wright, C. L., & Mist, S. D. (2010) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.020 · Cited by 284
“The important role of acceptance in decreasing the emotional distress and sympathetic activation associated with pain and other unpleasant symptomatology has received increased research focus and clinical attention [29,41,59].”
BackgroundEnglish, T., & John, O. P. (2012) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0029847 · Cited by 326
Belcher, B. R., Zink, J., Azad, A., Campbell, C. E., Chakravartti, S. P., & Herting, M. M. (2020) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.08.005 · Cited by 345
Divergent cognitive costs for online forms of reappraisal and distraction.
Sheppes, G., & Meiran, N. (2008) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0013711 · Cited by 272
“free emotion regulation strategy ( Gross, 2002, Rich ards, 2004).”
BackgroundImproving Acute Stress Responses: The Power of Reappraisal
Jamieson, J. P., Mendes, W. B., & Nock, M. K. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721412461500 · Cited by 273
“Research on reappraising arousal has extended work on emotion regulation (Gross, 1998, 2002) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; Hofmann & Smits, 2008).”
BackgroundHofmann, S. G., Carpenter, J. K., & Curtiss, J. (2016) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-016-9756-2 · Cited by 279
“Gross (2002) defines emotion regulation as the process by which people influence which emotions they have, when they have them, and how they experience and express these emotions.”
BackgroundAging and the HPA axis: Stress and resilience in older adults
Gaffey, A. E., Bergeman, C. S., Clark, L. A., & Wirth, M. M. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.036 · Cited by 273
Neural correlates of regulating negative emotions related to moral violations
Harenski, C. L., & Hamann, S. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.034 · Cited by 272
“Previous studies of emotion regulation have often used a strategy known as reappraisal, in which individuals attempt to decrease their emotional response to stimuli by reinterpreting an emotional stimulus in a manner that renders it less emotionally arousing (Gross, 2002; Jackson et al., 2000; Ochsner et al., 2002, 20…”
MethodIntegrative emotion regulation: Process and development from a self-determination theory perspective
Roth, G., Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2019) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579419000403 · Cited by 270
“In this model, different strategies for regulating emotions appear at different times during an emotional response (Gross, 2002), with antecedent-and response-focused strategies appearing, respectively, before full activation of the emotional response and when an emotion is already in progress.”
BackgroundNeuronal correlates of cognitive reappraisal in borderline patients with affective instability
Schulze, L., Domes, G., Krüger, A., Berger, C., Fleischer, M., Prehn, K., Schmahl, C., Grossmann, A., Hauenstein, K., & Herpertz, S. C. (2011) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.10.025 · Cited by 266
“The mean percent signal hange was calculated using anatomical regions of interest for the mygdala and a 3 mm sphere centered on the coordinate (38, 10, 8) erived from the whole-brain analysis.”
BackgroundMethodEpisodic processes in emotional labor: perceptions of affective delivery and regulation strategies.
Beal, D., Trougakos, J. P., Weiss, H., & Green, S. G. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1053 · Cited by 277
“…from research showing that suppression of emotional expression increases physiological activity, negatively influences later efforts at self-regulation, and generally is perceived as more difficult than other forms of emotion regulation (Baumeister et al., 1998; Butler et al., 2003; Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundKobylińska, D., & Kusev, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00072 · Cited by 328
“Emotion regulation can be aimed at reducing, strengthening, or maintaining the experience of either positive or negative emotions depending on the current needs or goals of an individual (Gross, 1998, 2002, 2014; Aldao, 2013).”
BackgroundEmotional reactivity and cognitive regulation in anxious children
Carthy, T., Horesh, N., Apter, A., Edge, M. D., & Gross, J. J. (2010) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.12.013 · Cited by 262
“…emotional activation but nonetheless report less frequent use of reappraisal, extends previous research which has found low reappraisal frequency to be linked with negative affect, fearfulness, and worries in non-clinical samples (Garnefski, Rieffe, Jellesma, Terwogt, & Kraaij, 2007; Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationCognitive reappraisal of negative affect: Converging evidence from EMG and self-report
Ray, R. D., McRae, K., Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2010) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0019015 · Cited by 256
“These attempts at emotion regulation have been shown to impact both intra- and interpersonal functioning (Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAffective motivations to help others: A two‐stage model of donation decisions
Dickert, S., Sagara, N., & Slovic, P. (2010) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.697 · Cited by 262
A predictive study of emotional labor and turnover
Chau, S. L., Dahling, J. J., Levy, P. E., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.617 · Cited by 262
“Thus, when employees engage in deep acting to conform to these display rules, it should result in more positive emotional experiences for the employee (Grandey, 2000; Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundEmotion regulation in depression: Examining the role of cognitive processes
Joormann, J., & D’Avanzato, C. (2010) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931003784939 · Cited by 288
“…defining and differentiating emotion and emotion regulation is difficult even though some authors have recently begun to formulate core features of these concepts (Gross, 2002; Gross & Thompson, 2007; see Bloch, Moran, & Kring, 2009, for a discussion of different definitions of emotion regulation).”
BackgroundA Spanish Adaptation of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Cabello, R., Salguero, J. M., Fernández‐Berrocal, P., & Gross, J. J. (2012) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000150 · Cited by 336
Self-citationUnderstanding pain catastrophizing: Putting pieces together
Petrini, L., & Arendt-Nielsen, L. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603420 · Cited by 259
“Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 8 December 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 603420 Emotion regulation refers to a process by which individuals can influence the course and expression of their emotions (Gross, 1998, 2002), and it is essential for maintaining a healthy life.”
BackgroundCarroll, A., Forrest, K., Sanders-O’Connor, E., Flynn, L., Bower, J. M., Fynes-Clinton, S., York, A., & Ziaei, M. (2022) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-022-09686-7 · Cited by 259
“In a teaching context, which involves constant management of interpersonal relationships, teachers who possess greater emotion regulation capabilities are predicted to experience less stress and burnout (Gross, 2002; Montgomery & Rupp, 2005).”
BackgroundPatterns of emotion regulation and psychopathology
Eftekhari, A., Zoellner, L. A., & Vigil, S. A. (2009) · Anxiety, Stress, & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615800802179860 · Cited by 249
“Furthermore, it does not increase physiological arousal during emotionally charged events (Gross & Levenson, 1993, 1997) and has been viewed as adaptive for processing memories and integrating new experiences (Ehlers & Clark, 2000; Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundLinking emotion regulation strategies to affective events and negative emotions at work
Diefendorff, J. M., Richard, E. M., & Yang, J. (2008) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.09.006 · Cited by 254
Determinants of negative word-of-mouth communication using social networking sites
Balaji, M. S., Khong, K. W., & Chong, A. Y. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.12.002 · Cited by 292
Feelings Into Words: Contributions of Language to Exposure Therapy
Kircanski, K., Lieberman, M. D., & Craske, M. G. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612443830 · Cited by 249
“Whereas reappraisal (e.g., Eippert et al., 2007; Gross, 1998, 2002; Ochsner et al., 2002) and distraction (e.g., Antony et al., 2001; Craske et al., 1991) are considered intentional and often effective forms of emotion regulation, affect labeling is relatively unintentional (Lieberman, 2011), and…”
BackgroundBeauregard, M. (2007) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.01.005 · Cited by 259
An fMRI study measuring analgesia enhanced by religion as a belief system.
Wiech, K., Farias, M., Kahane, G., Shackel, N., Tiede, W., & Tracey, I. (2008) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.030 · Cited by 251
“Reappraisal is a process of reinterpreting the meaning of a stimulus leading to a change in one’s emotional response to it [9].”
Koenigsberg, H. W., Fan, J., Ochsner, K. N., Liu, X., Guise, K. G., Pizzarello, S., Dorantes, C., Guerreri, S., Tecuta, L., Goodman, M., et al. (2009) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.06.010 · Cited by 250
Sheppes, G., Catran, E., & Meiran, N. (2008) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.06.006 · Cited by 267
“Specifically, in the following sections we show that previous studies have established that reappraisal – construing an emotional situation in non emotional terms -has no physiological or cognitive costs (see Gross, 2002; Richards, 2004, for reviews).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialReconceptualizing Emotion Regulation
Campos, J. J., Walle, E. A., Dahl, A., & Main, A. (2011) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073910380975 · Cited by 245
“It is now common to think that cognitive reappraisal is typically more adaptive than expressive suppression (Gross, 2002); however, findings from several experimental studies reveal only that reappraisal is more effective in reducing self-report of negative emotions and physiological arousal in response to a video cli…”
ResultEmotion regulation in children and adolescents with autism Spectrum disorder
Samson, A. C., Hardan, A. Y., Podell, R. W., Phillips, J. M., & Gross, J. J. (2015) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1387 · Cited by 242
“Previous studies suggest that cognitive reappraisal is a strategy that is highly effective in downregulating negative emotions in TD individuals and predicts positive long-term outcomes [e.g. Bower et al., 2005; Gross, 2002].”
BackgroundSelf-citationBeliefs About Emotion: Links to Emotion Regulation, Well-Being, and Psychological Distress
Castella, K. D., Goldin, P. R., Jazaieri, H., Ziv, M., Dweck, C. S., & Gross, J. J. (2013) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2013.840632 · Cited by 276
Self-citationTell me about it: Neural activity elicited by emotional pictures and preceding descriptions.
MacNamara, A., Foti, D., & Hajcak, G. (2009) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0016251 · Cited by 241
“In fact, people are capable of altering the context of emotion by changing the way they think about emotional information, that is, by changing the meaning attributed to emotional stimuli; this process has been referred to as cognitive reappraisal (cf. Gross, 1998, 2002).”
BackgroundDepression: a decision-theoretic analysis
Huys, Q. J. M., Daw, N. D., & Dayan, P. (2015) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-071714-033928 · Cited by 221
“Antecedent ER strategies (Gross 2002) are said to improve emotions by altering the situation or the interpretation of the emotional material one is exposed to before the emotion itself is experienced.”
BackgroundD’Avanzato, C., Joormann, J., Siemer, M., & Gotlib, I. H. (2013) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-013-9537-0 · Cited by 239
“Emotion regulation is defined as the use of cognitive or behavioral strategies in order to modify the circumstances in which an emotion occurs, the experience of an emotional response (including its intensity and duration), or the way in which an emotion is overtly expressed (Gross 2002).”
BackgroundEmotional Mental Imagery as Simulation of Reality: Fear and Beyond—A Tribute to Peter Lang
Ji, J. L., Heyes, S. B., MacLeod, C., & Holmes, E. A. (2016) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2015.11.004 · Cited by 234
“Metacognitive strategies aim to down regulate the impact of distressing mental imagery via reappraisal (Gross, 2002).”
BackgroundThe empirical status of the "new wave" of cognitive behavioral therapy
Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2010) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2010.04.006 · Cited by 255
Strategic automation of emotion regulation.
Gallo, I. S., Keil, A., McCulloch, K. C., Rockstroh, B., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013460 · Cited by 235
Attentional disengagement predicts stress recovery in depression: An eye-tracking study.
Sánchez-López, Á., Vázquez, C., Marker, C. D., LeMoult, J., & Joormann, J. (2013) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031529 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Gross, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gross, James J.
- ORCID
- Gross, James J.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 281-291
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8986
- OpenAlex
- W2128126978
- Cited by
- 4,890
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 341 · 2025: 492 · 2024: 315 · 2023: 314 · 2022: 321 · 2021: 315 · 2020: 273 · 2019: 267 · 2018: 276 · 2017: 254 · 2016: 226 · 2015: 232 · 2014: 233 · 2013: 228 · 2012: 179
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 58147)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- emotion regulation, cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, process model of emotion regulation, emotional experience, emotional expression, memory impairment, individual differences
- MeSH terms
- Affect, Cognition, Emotions, Humans, Psychophysiology, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-01, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-01 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review