Cited by 557Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness ResearchMind wandering and attention

Altered brain response to verbal learning following sleep deprivation

Drummond, Sean P. A., Brown, Gregory G., Gillin, J. Christian, Stricker, John L., Wong, Eric C., Buxton, Richard B.·2000·Nature

Abstract

The effects of sleep deprivation on the neural substrates of cognition are poorly understood. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure the effects of 35 hours of sleep deprivation on cerebral activation during verbal learning in normal young volunteers. On the basis of a previous hypothesis, we predicted that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) would be less responsive to cognitive demands following sleep deprivation. Contrary to our expectations, however, the PFC was more responsive after one night of sleep deprivation than after normal sleep. Increased subjective sleepiness in sleep-deprived subjects correlated significantly with activation of the PFC. The temporal lobe was activated after normal sleep but not after sleep deprivation; in contrast, the parietal lobes were not activated after normal sleep but were activated after sleep deprivation. Although sleep deprivation significantly impaired free recall compared with the rested state, better free recall in sleep-deprived subjects was associated with greater parietal lobe activation. These findings show that there are dynamic, compensatory changes in cerebral activation during verbal learning after sleep deprivation and implicate the PFC and parietal lobes in this compensation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/35001068

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior sleep deprivation impairs verbal learning ability and reduces temporal lobe activation during learning.

    “Prior sleep deprivation impairs verbal learning ability and reduces temporal lobe activation during learning (328,329).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [329]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drummond, S. P. A., Brown, G. G., Gillin, J. C., Stricker, J. L., Wong, E. C., & Buxton, R. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Gillin, J. Christian
Venue
Nature
Published
2000-02
Volume
403
Issue
6770
Pages
655-657
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1669563091
Cited by
557
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 28
FWCI
24.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Royal Society
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
sleep deprivation, verbal learning, prefrontal cortex, parietal lobe, temporal lobe, brain activation, free recall, subjective sleepiness, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Oxygen, Parietal Lobe, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, Verbal Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review