Cited by 1,289Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Maintenance, reserve and compensation: the cognitive neuroscience of healthy ageing

Open access
Cabeza, Roberto, Albert, Marilyn, Belleville, Sylvie, Craik, Fergus I. M., Duarte, Audrey, Grady, Cheryl L., Lindenberger, Ulman, Nyberg, Lars +5 more·2018·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

Cognitive ageing research examines the cognitive abilities that are preserved and/or those that decline with advanced age. There is great individual variability in cognitive ageing trajectories. Some older adults show little decline in cognitive ability compared with young adults and are thus termed 'optimally ageing'. By contrast, others exhibit substantial cognitive decline and may develop dementia. Human neuroimaging research has led to a number of important advances in our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying these two outcomes. However, interpreting the age-related changes and differences in brain structure, activation and functional connectivity that this research reveals is an ongoing challenge. Ambiguous terminology is a major source of difficulty in this venture. Three terms in particular - compensation, maintenance and reserve - have been used in a number of different ways, and researchers continue to disagree about the kinds of evidence or patterns of results that are required to interpret findings related to these concepts. As such inconsistencies can impede progress in both theoretical and empirical research, here, we aim to clarify and propose consensual definitions of these terms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41583-018-0068-2

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

39 of 74 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    When adults with high reserve eventually show cognitive decline, they decline at a rapid rate.

    “However, it has been observed that when adults with high levels of reserve, as indicated by one or more reserve proxies, do eventually display cognitive decline, they do so at a rapid rate 69.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [69] Reed, B. R. et al. Measuring cognitive reserve based on the decomposition of episodic memory variance. Brain 133, 2196–2209 (2010). source

      The Hypothesis 4 results report that higher baseline reserve predicted slower, not faster, decline in executive function. The Discussion likewise says higher reserve was associated with less decline. The paper does not report a separate analysis of decline after its onset that would support the citing sentence's qualification. (LLM, conf=0.81)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Proxy measures of reserve may engage different neural mechanisms, each important for a different aspect of reserve, such as neural capacity or neural efficiency.

    “In addition, it is likely that proxy measures of reserve may engage different neural mechanisms, each important for a different aspect reserve, such neural capacity (the total amount of neural resources available for cognition) or neural efficiency (using less neural resources—often operationalized as neural activity—to perform a cognitive task).54,56”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [54] Ghisletta, P., Rabbitt, P., Lunn, M. & Lindenberger, U. Two thirds of the age-based changes in fluid and crystallized intelligence, perceptual speed, and memory in adulthood are shared. Intelligence 40, 260–268 (2012). source

      The Discussion considers shared and domain-specific mechanisms of age-related cognitive decline, but does not discuss proxy measures of reserve or distinguish neural capacity from neural efficiency. Searches for those terms and for cognitive-reserve proxies found no passage addressing the attributed claim; the Conclusions also say the behavioral evidence cannot establish the nature of the underlying factors. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [56] Piras, F., Cherubini, A., Caltagirone, C. & Spalletta, G. Education mediates microstructural changes in bilateral hippocampus. Hum. Brain Mapp. 32, 282–289 (2011). source

      The Introduction (page not specified) distinguishes reserve capacity in a threshold model from more efficient use of brain networks in an active model. It also identifies education as a reserve proxy, but does not say that different proxy measures engage different neural mechanisms or correspond to different aspects of reserve. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Diffusion MRI indicates age-related changes in white matter connectivity between prefrontal and posterior cortical regions and within posterior sensory cortices.

    “Diffusion MRI methods have shown age-related changes in white matter connectivity between prefrontal and posterior cortical regions, and within posterior sensory cortices.25–27”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [25] Musiek, E. S. & Holtzman, D. M. Mechanisms linking circadian clocks, sleep, and neurodegeneration. Science 354, 1004–1008 (2016). source

      The Sleep and Neurodegeneration section discusses sleep, synaptic function, and medial prefrontal amyloid pathology, while the Circadian function and neurodegeneration section discusses age-related circadian changes. Neither addresses diffusion MRI or the specified age-related white matter connectivity changes. Searches for diffusion MRI and for connectivity in posterior sensory cortices found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [26] Hullinger, R. & Puglielli, L. Molecular and cellular aspects of age-related cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease. Behav. Brain Res. 322, 191–205 (2017). source

      The Introduction and §5.1 discuss age-related brain and synaptic changes, but not diffusion MRI findings about the specified cortical connections. Searches for diffusion MRI, white matter, and prefrontal-to-posterior or posterior sensory connectivity found no passage addressing the claim. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [27] Mattson, M. P. & Arumugam, T. V. Hallmarks of brain aging: adaptive and pathological modification by metabolic states. Cell Metab. 27, 1176–1199 (2018). source

      The 'Aberrant Neuronal Network Activity' section says white matter integrity is compromised during normal aging and describes age-related changes in functional connectivity. It does not say that diffusion MRI showed changes specifically between prefrontal and posterior cortical regions or within posterior sensory cortices. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Development of expertise is associated with richer and more differentiated conceptual representations, which can attenuate age-related decline in the domain of expertise.

    “The development of expertise is associated with the presence of richer and more differentiated conceptual representations, which can attenuate age-related decline in the domain of expertise.54,65–67”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [54] Ghisletta, P., Rabbitt, P., Lunn, M. & Lindenberger, U. Two thirds of the age-based changes in fluid and crystallized intelligence, perceptual speed, and memory in adulthood are shared. Intelligence 40, 260–268 (2012). source

      The Abstract reports age-related cognitive decline, and the Discussion notes that some variation in decline is domain-specific. Neither passage addresses whether expertise produces richer conceptual representations or attenuates decline in an expert domain. Searches for expertise and domain-specific protection found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [65] Alladi, S. et al. Bilingualism delays age at onset of dementia, independent of education and immigration status. Neurology 81, 1938–1944 (2013). source
    • cites [66] Anthony, M. & Lin, F. A. Systematic review for functional neuroimaging studies of cognitive reserve across the cognitive aging spectrum. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acx125 (2017). source

      The Introduction (page not available) says cognitive reserve may help people tolerate or compensate for the effects of aging and discusses delaying cognitive decline. It does not address expertise, richer and more differentiated conceptual representations, or protection specifically within a domain of expertise. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [67] Reed, B. R. et al. Cognitive activities during adulthood are more important than education in building reserve. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 17, 615–624 (2011). source

      The Discussion (page not provided) links midlife cognitive activity to greater semantic-memory reserve and suggests that abilities may be maintained to different degrees in the face of dementia. It does not examine expertise or say that developing expertise produces richer, more differentiated conceptual representations; nor does it demonstrate reduced age-related decline specifically within a domain of expertise. (LLM, conf=0.79)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Education improves neural resources during childhood and young adulthood, possibly by increasing synaptic density.

    “A good example of a factor that promotes reserve is education, which improves neural resources during childhood and young adulthood, possibly by enhancing synaptic density 50”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] Trahan, L. H., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M. & Hiscock, M. The Flynn effect: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 140, 1332–1360 (2014). source

      The “What is Rising?” section discusses formal education as a possible contributor to rising IQ scores, not as a means of improving neural resources. A search of our copy for neural resources, cognitive reserve, and synaptic density found no passage addressing the claimed mechanism during childhood or young adulthood. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 31
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 38
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Normal aging is accompanied by reductions in gray matter volume and functional changes in prefrontal, medial temporal, and parietal cortices.

    “magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have shown that normal aging is associated with gray matter volume reductions and functional alterations in several regions critical for higher cognitive function: prefrontal, medial temporal and parietal cortices.21–24”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [21] Roy, A. K. et al. Impacts of transcriptional regulation on aging and senescence. Ageing Res. Rev. 1, 367–380 (2002). source
    • cites [22] Foster, T. C. Role of estrogen receptor alpha and beta expression and signaling on cognitive function during aging. Hippocampus 22, 656–669 (2012). source

      The paper’s section on ERα and ERβ expression and E2-induced synaptogenesis discusses age-related synaptic and memory changes, not MRI findings. Searches for gray-matter volume, MRI, and the specified cortical regions found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed regional volume reductions and functional alterations. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [23] Papenberg, G., Salami, A., Persson, J., Lindenberger, U. & Backman, L. Genetics and functional imaging: effects of APOE, BDNF, COMT, and KIBRA in aging. Neuropsychol Rev. 25, 47–62 (2015). source
    • cites [24] Campisi, J. Cellular senescence and apoptosis: how cellular responses might influence aging phenotypes. Exp. Gerontol. 38, 5–11 (2003). source

      Section 2.1 (Apoptosis; page unavailable) discusses possible neuronal loss with aging, but does not report MRI findings, gray matter volume reductions, or functional changes in the named cortices. Searches for those cortical regions and for MRI and gray matter volume found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Young adults may also upregulate activity in response to increased task demands, but the demand threshold for upregulation may be higher in young than in older adults.

    “It is worth noting that young adults may also upregulate activity in response to increased task demands, but that the demand threshold for upregulation may be higher in young, compared to older adults24,36.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [24] Campisi, J. Cellular senescence and apoptosis: how cellular responses might influence aging phenotypes. Exp. Gerontol. 38, 5–11 (2003). source

      Section 2.1 discusses apoptosis and neuronal compensation after cell loss; Figure 1 discusses thresholds at which tissue health becomes compromised. Neither addresses activity upregulation in response to task demands or compares the demand thresholds of young and older adults (searched for task demands and cognitive activity upregulation). Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [36] Sperling, R. Potential of functional MRI as a biomarker in early Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 32 (Suppl. 1), S37–S43 (2011). source

      The Abstract discusses increased fMRI activity in people with mild cognitive impairment or at risk of Alzheimer’s disease, but does not compare young and older adults’ responses to increasing task demands. Searches for young adults, task difficulty, and demand thresholds found no passage addressing the proposed difference in upregulation thresholds. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Given the link between exercise and white-matter integrity, individuals who exercise regularly may maintain white-matter integrity better than other aspects of the brain.

    “For example, given the link between exercise and white-matter integrity,70 it is possible that individuals who exercise regularly maintain white-matter integrity better than other aspects of the brain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [70] Bernardi, G. et al. How skill expertise shapes the brain functional architecture: an fMRI study of visuo-spatial and motor processing in professional racing-car and naive drivers. PLOS ONE 8, e77764 (2013). source

      The citation is attached to the asserted link between exercise and white-matter integrity. The Conclusions discuss psycho-physical training and functional brain efficiency, while the Methods mention white matter only as a signal used in fMRI processing; neither addresses white-matter integrity in people who exercise regularly (page numbers unavailable). Searched for white-matter integrity, exercise, and physical training. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    Linking compensation to successful performance helps distinguish compensation from activation differences due to inefficiency, dedifferentiation, or pathology.

    “Linking compensation to successful performance (Box 1) helps distinguish compensation from activation differences due to inefficiency, dedifferentiation, or pathology (Box 2)80.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80] Gorbach, T. et al. Longitudinal association between hippocampus atrophy and episodic-memory decline. Neurobiol. Aging 51, 167–176 (2017). source

      The Results (§3.3) link hippocampal change with episodic-memory change, and the Discussion (§4) relates preserved memory to brain maintenance. Neither addresses whether linking compensation to successful performance distinguishes it from inefficiency, dedifferentiation, or pathology. Searches for those terms and for activation differences found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although greater activity in older adults may merely reflect inefficiency, it is difficult to interpret greater activity as inefficient when it correlates positively with cognitive performance.

    “Although greater activity in older adults may merely reflect inefficiency,82 it is difficult to interpret greater activity as inefficient when it correlates positively with cognitive performance, which is one of our requirements for applying the term compensation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [82] Pudas, S. et al. Brain characteristics of individuals resisting age-related cognitive decline over two decades. J. Neurosci. 33, 8668–8677 (2013). source

      The citation is attached to the suggestion that greater activity in older adults may reflect inefficiency, not to the citing authors’ subsequent argument about performance correlations. The Introduction and Discussion discuss greater activation as possible compensation, neural capacity, or a longstanding individual difference, but do not address inefficiency. Searches for “inefficiency” and “inefficient neural activity” found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mechanisms contributing to maintenance likely have genetic and environmental origins, with environmental factors including diet, exercise, and cognitive and social engagement.

    “Similar to the concept of reserve, the mechanisms contributing to maintenance are also likely to have both genetic77 and environmental origins, with the latter including factors such as diet, exercise, and cognitive and social engagement33,57,78.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [77] Vaci, N., Gula, B. & Bilalic, M. Is age really cruel to experts? Compensatory effects of activity. Psychol. Aging 30, 740–754 (2015). source
    • cites [33] Freeman, G. B. & Gibson, G. E. Dopamine, acetylcholine, and glutamate interactions in aging. Behavioral and neurochemical correlates. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 515, 191–202 (1988). source
    • cites [57] Stern, Y. Cognitive reserve and Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 20, 112–117 (2006). source

      In MEASURES OF RESERVE (p. 2), Stern discusses genetic and environmental influences on reserve and says that exercise and stimulating environments promote neurogenesis in animals. EPIDEMIOLOGIC EVIDENCE FOR CR (p. 2) links cognitive and social activities with lower dementia risk. The paper does not address diet or establish these factors as mechanisms of maintenance, rather than reserve. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [78] Stern, Y., Albert, S., Tang, M. & Tsai, W. Rate of memory decline in AD is related to education and occupation. Neurology 1, 1942–1947 (1999). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Consistent with reduced neural resources, older adults show a greater increase in activity, a lower asymptote, and an earlier decline than younger adults.

    “Several studies36,38–41 have found that, consistent with reduced neural resources, older adults show a greater increase in activity, a lower asymptote, and an earlier decline than younger adults”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [36] Sperling, R. Potential of functional MRI as a biomarker in early Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 32 (Suppl. 1), S37–S43 (2011). source

      The Abstract discusses increased activation in people at risk for Alzheimer’s disease, followed by loss of activation as cognitive impairment worsens; it does not compare activation patterns in older and younger adults. Searches for “asymptote” and age-related activation under increasing task demand found no passage addressing the claimed lower asymptote or earlier decline. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [38] Tromp, D., Dufour, A., Lithfous, S., Pebayle, T. & Despres, O. Episodic memory in normal aging and Alzheimer disease: insights from imaging and behavioral studies. Ageing Res. Rev. 24, 232–262 (2015). source
    • cites [39] Walhovd, K. B. et al. Consistent neuroanatomical age-related volume differences across multiple samples. Neurobiol. Aging 32, 916–932 (2011). source

      The Discussion reports age-related differences in brain volume, including accelerating white-matter volume loss after middle age. It does not address the claimed pattern of neural activity—a greater increase, lower asymptote, and earlier decline in older adults (searched: activity, neural resources, and functional activation). (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [40] Rajah, M. N., Maillet, D. & Grady, C. L. in The Wiley Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory (eds Addis, D., Barense, M. & Duarte, A.) 347–361 (Wiley Publishers, New York, 2015). source
    • cites [41] Nyberg, L. et al. Longitudinal evidence for diminished frontal cortex function in aging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22682–22686 (2010). source

      The Results and Discussion report reduced frontal activity as older adults were followed over time, which supports an age-related reduction in recruitment. They do not establish the claimed greater increase in activity, lower asymptote, or earlier decline relative to younger adults; the Discussion cautions that cross-sectional signs of increased activity reflected a selected elderly sample. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The asymptote in neural activity reflects available neural resources, and the final decline reflects breakdown in cognitive performance when those resources are exceeded.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The time-scale of maintenance processes likely varies with the neural level at which they occur, such as molecules, cells, or systems.

    “The time-scale of maintenance processes likely varies depending on the neural level at which it takes place (molecules, cells or systems).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Reserve is thought to accumulate before neural resources show age-related decreases, over a period of years.

    “Reserve is hypothesized to accumulate before neural resources demonstrate age-related decreases, over a period of years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Defining reserve merely as the factor that individuals with greater reserve have, and then using it to explain why some have greater reserve, is circular.

    “It is worth noting that if reserve is defined merely as “the factor that individuals with greater reserve have,” and then this factor is used to explain why some individuals have greater reserve, the argument is clearly circular.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Reserve, maintenance, and compensation are dynamic and modifiable, and they both modify behavior and are modified by behavioral changes.

    “It is important to emphasize that the mechanisms of reserve, maintenance, and compensation are not static but dynamic and modifiable, and they are likely not only responsible for modifying behavior, but are in turn modified by such changes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Maintenance occurs throughout life but may become more critical in old age as neural deterioration becomes more severe.

    “Maintenance occurs throughout the lifespan but may become more critical in old age, as neural deterioration becomes more severe.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Reserve accumulates most during childhood and young adulthood, but it may also build up in older age.

    “Presumably reserve accumulates most during childhood and young adulthood, but it may also build up in older age,9”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Rajah, M. N. & D’Esposito, M. Region-specific changes in prefrontal function with age: a review of PET and fMRI studies on working and episodic memory. Brain 128, 1964–1983 (2005). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In cross-sectional aging studies, older participants are usually drawn only from the subset who aged successfully, while young adult samples are more heterogeneous.

    “For example, whereas older participants are typically recruited only from the sub-set of people who aged successfully, young adult samples are more heterogeneous.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Longitudinal designs avoid the problems of cross-sectional designs and can consistently show large individual differences in rates of age-related decline.

    “Although they have their own limitations,46 longitudinal designs avoid these problems and can consistently demonstrate large individual differences in rates of age-related decline.47,48”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [46] Lindenberger, U. Human cognitive aging: corriger la fortune? Science 346, 572–578 (2014). source
    • cites [47] World Health Organisation. World Report on Ageing and Health (eds Beard, J., Officer, A. & Cassels, A.) (WHO, Luxembourg, 2015).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [48] Habib, R., Nyberg, L. & Nilsson, L. G. Cognitive and non-cognitive factors contributing to the longitudinal identification of successful older adults in the Betula study. Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 14, 257–273 (2007). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    In the ideal case, accumulated reserve completely offsets age-related neural decline; in the typical case, it only attenuates that decline.

    “In the ideal case, accumulated reserve is enough to completely offset age-related neural decline, whereas in the typical case, it only attenuates this decline.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    In the optimal case, repair processes fully counteract decline; typically, repair does not completely offset neural deterioration, leading to gradual age-related neural deterioration.

    “In the optimal case, repair processes fully counteract decline. In the typical scenario, however, repair processes do not completely offset neural deterioration, leading to a gradual process of age-related neural deterioration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Some individuals may be relatively spared from detrimental brain changes, making maintenance likely regardless of repair capacity.

    “However, some individuals may be relatively spared from detrimental brain changes in the first place resulting in a high likelihood of displaying maintenance regardless of the capacity for repair.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Compensation-related individual differences are expected to vary with the cognitive challenge and correlate more with task performance than with reserve proxies.

    “Individual differences reflecting compensation, in contrast, might be expected to differ according to the nature of the cognitive challenge, and to correlate more with individual differences in task performance than with proxy measures of reserve”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Reserve-related activity differences are expected to be trait-like, appear across cognitive domains, and correlate with independent proxies such as IQ or education.

    “Differences related to reserve might be expected to manifest as ‘trait-like’ effects that are evident across a range of different cognitive domains, and to correlate with independent proxies of reserve, such as IQ or educational level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    For reserve and maintenance, age-related neural decline is countered by neural enhancement, meaning creation, replenishment, and repair of neural resources.

    “In the case of reserve and maintenance (FIGS. 1–B/C), processes of age-related ‘neural decline’ (such as brain atrophy, synaptic loss, white-matter degradation, etc.) are countered by processes of ‘neural enhancement,’ that is, the creation, replenishment, and repair of neural resources (brain anatomy and physiology mediating cognitive processes).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The terms reserve, maintenance, and compensation have been used inconsistently, which creates confusion and slows progress.

    “However, over the years, these terms have been used inconsistently, creating confusion and slowing progress.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Hippocampal maintenance is associated with episodic memory maintenance, and maintenance of other brain regions is likely associated with preservation of other cognitive abilities.

    “Whereas hippocampal maintenance has been associated with episodic memory maintenance, the maintenance of other brain regions is likely to be associated with the preservation of other cognitive abilities33.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] Freeman, G. B. & Gibson, G. E. Dopamine, acetylcholine, and glutamate interactions in aging. Behavioral and neurochemical correlates. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 515, 191–202 (1988). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Prefrontal cortex maintenance could be associated with maintenance of cognitive control.

    “For example, PFC maintenance could be associated with the maintenance of cognitive control.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In the context of aging, it is more appropriate to emphasize loss of neural resources.

    “In the context of aging, it is more appropriate to emphasize the loss in neural resources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    The view that compensation requires a link to performance departs from some uses of the term in the literature, where it is applied to any age-related increase in brain activity or recruitment of additional brain regions regardless of performance.

    “This is a point on which our view departs from some uses of the term compensation in the literature, where the term is often applied to any age-related increase in brain activity, or to the recruitment of additional brain regions in older but not young adults, regardless of relationship with performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although reserve and maintenance are similar, they are complementary perspectives on how environmental and biological factors influence brain aging and cognition.

    “Therefore, although the concepts of reserve and maintenance are similar, we view them as complementary perspectives on how environmental and biological factors influence brain aging and cognition.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Reserve factors cumulatively influence neural capacity and neural efficiency, whereas maintenance factors influence neural mechanisms of repair and plasticity.

    “In the case of reserve, these factors cumulative influence neural capacity and neural efficiency (and other mechanisms not yet identified due to limits of technology). In the case of maintenance, these factors influence neural mechanisms of repair and plasticity (and others not yet identified).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The process selected by older adults in compensation by selection is also available to young adults, but is less likely to support their performance.

    “The important point is that the process selected by older adults is also available to young adults, but less likely to be the one that supports their performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A different activation region in older adults may be part of the same functional network used by younger adults, which would indicate upregulation rather than selection.

    “Also, older adults may show activation in a different region than young adults, but this region could be a different component of the same functional network recruited by younger adults, suggesting compensation by upregulation rather than selection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    These forms of compensation are not mutually exclusive, and one or more may co-occur within or across individuals.

    “We posit that these forms of compensation are not mutually exclusive such that one or more may co-occur within or across individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Compensation by upregulation refers to enhancement of cognitive performance by boosting a neural process in response to task demands.

    “Compensation by upregulation refers to the enhancement of cognitive performance by boosting a neural process in response to task demands.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Reserve affects later maintenance and vice versa, because accumulated reserve must be maintained.

    “We acknowledge that reserve has an impact on later maintenance, and vice versa, as the accumulated reserve must be maintained.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is theoretically possible that the extent to which different maintenance mechanisms operate depends on initial brain measures.

    “It is theoretically possible that the extent to which different maintenance mechanisms operate depends on initial brain measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Without a link to performance, age-related increases in activity should be described as age-related differences, not as compensatory activity.

    “In our view, without a link to performance, these findings should be simply described as age-related differences (increases or decreases) in activity, and not as compensatory activity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The closest analogy to compensation by reorganization is the formation of new neural mechanisms after brain damage.

    “The closest analogy to this type of compensation would be the development of new neural mechanisms following brain damage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The supply-demand gap may arise from an age-related reduction in neural resources, an increase in task demands, or both.

    “This gap may be due to an age-related reduction in neural resources (e.g., brain atrophy, reduced blood flow, neurotransmitter deficits, reduced neural specificity, etc.), due to an increase in task demands, or both.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Reserve concerns enhancing and augmenting resources, whereas maintenance concerns their upkeep.

    “reserve is about enhancing and augmenting resources, whereas maintenance is about their up-keep.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Compensation by selection occurs when older adults recruit neural circuitry associated with cognitive processes that are available to but not engaged by young adults under the same objective task conditions.

    “Compensation by selection occurs when older adults recruit neural circuitry associated with cognitive processes that are available to but not engaged by young adults under the same objective task conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    To attribute greater activity or connectivity to compensation, evidence should show that the enhanced activation in older adults is related to a beneficial effect on cognitive performance.

    “Second, evidence should be available that the enhanced activation in older adults is related to a beneficial effect on cognitive performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Compensation by reorganization is when older adults use an alternative neural mechanism to respond to aging-related losses, a mechanism unavailable to younger individuals.

    “Finally, compensation by reorganization occurs when older adults use an alternative neural mechanism to respond to aging-induced losses that is not available to younger individuals76.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [76] Morrow, D., Leirer, V., Altieri, P. & Fitzsimmons, C. When expertise reduces age-differences in performance. Psychol. Aging 9, 134–148 (1994). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Brain maintainers include people who begin with above-average brain measures and keep them high, as well as people who begin below average and maintain that lower level.

    ““brain maintainers” include individuals who start with above-average brain measures in early adulthood (e.g., larger hippocampus) and maintain these high levels into older age, as well as individuals who start below average (e.g., smaller hippocampus) and maintaining functioning at that lower level.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Three different mechanisms or forms of compensation can be distinguished: upregulation, selection, and recruitment of additional processes.

    “we found it necessary to distinguish among three different mechanisms or forms of compensation (all incorporating the two criteria above): upregulation, selection, and recruitment of additional processes (see FIG 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Greater brain activity or connectivity in older adults is sometimes interpreted as beneficial without additional supporting evidence.

    “Greater brain activity or connectivity is sometimes interpreted as being beneficial to older adults, without any additional supporting evidence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Compensation is temporally linked to variations in cognitive demands and can occur rapidly, within seconds.

    “Compensation is temporally linked to variations in cognitive demands and can occur rapidly, in a matter of seconds.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Maintenance is a dynamic process that engages cellular repair mechanisms and may overlap substantially with adult brain plasticity.

    “In summary, we see maintenance as a dynamic process that engages neural mechanisms of cellular repair and may overlap to a large degree with mechanisms of brain plasticity in adulthood76.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [76] Morrow, D., Leirer, V., Altieri, P. & Fitzsimmons, C. When expertise reduces age-differences in performance. Psychol. Aging 9, 134–148 (1994). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In compensation by selection, older adults may engage a less effective but less demanding process, whereas younger adults prefer a more effective but more demanding one.

    “For example, older adults may engage a less effective but also a less demanding process, whereas younger adults prefer a more effective but more demanding one.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because brain structures and processes interact closely, it is possible to speak of general brain maintenance.

    “However, given the close interaction between different brain structures and processes, it is also possible to talk about general brain maintenance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Alternative neural circuits used in compensation may be less effective than the original ones, but recruiting them may still improve performance.

    “Although these alternative circuits may be less effective than the original ones, their recruitment may still benefit performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Two basic criteria must be met to attribute greater activity or connectivity in older adults to compensation.

    “However, we believe that two basic criteria must be fulfilled in order to attribute greater activity/connectivity in older adults to compensation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Maintenance is operationalized as a relative lack of decline in one or more neural measures, not in absolute terms.

    “Given that maintenance is operationalized as a relative lack of decline in one or more neural measures, and not in absolute terms”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    In functional neuroimaging studies, compensation is often used to describe greater or more widespread brain activity or functional connectivity in older adults than in younger adults.

    “In functional neuroimaging studies, compensation is often used to describe a situation in which brain activity, or functional connectivity, is greater, or more widespread, in older adults than in younger adults.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Reserve, maintenance, and compensation can occur at the same time and influence one another.

    “Although we have discussed reserve, maintenance, and compensation in separate sections, they can operate concurrently and affect each other.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    People who have a neurological disease or disorder might compensate for their deficits in a manner resembling that described for healthy older adults.

    “That is, individuals with neurological disease or disorder may compensate for their disorder-related deficit in ways similar to those described here for healthy older adults.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Reorganization from aging and from brain damage differ in several ways, including that aging is slow while brain injury is fast.

    “It is worth noting that although we compared reorganization due to aging and due to brain damage, they differ in several ways, including the fact that the time-course of aging is slow whereas the course of brain injury is fast.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    When evaluating cognitive training for reserve, one must consider whether age-related maintenance deficits will make the training less effective.

    “Thus, when considering the potential effects of cognitive training on promoting reserve, one has to consider whether age-related deficits in maintenance will render these effects less effective.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The concepts of reserve, maintenance, and compensation can also be applied beyond healthy aging, such as to psychiatric illness, neurodegeneration, acute brain injury, and child development.

    “In addition, we note that despite our focus on healthy aging, the concepts we have discussed also can be applied in other domains, including child development, acute brain injury, neurodegeneration, and psychiatric illness”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
57 of 57
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Mechanisms, understood as putative causal explanations of age-related changes, exist at multiple levels of analysis, such as genetic, cellular, and system levels.

    “We assume that mechanisms, which refer to putative causal explanations of age-related changes, exist at multiple levels of analysis (genetic, cellular, system, etc.).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Because of age-related neural decline, some older adults have difficulty implementing cognitive operations that would not have taxed them when younger.

    “we assume that due to age-related neural decline, some older adults have difficulty implementing cognitive operations that would not have taxed their younger selves.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The asymptote in neural activity reflects available neural resources, and the final decline reflects breakdown in cognitive performance when those resources are exceeded.

    “It is assumed that the asymptote reflects available neural resources, and the final decline reflects the breakdown in cognitive performance when these resources are exceeded.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Reserve cannot be measured directly.

    “Given that it is not possible to measure reserve directly, most studies of reserve have focused on a particular proxy and how it relates to the functioning brain.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most cognitive aging research so far has used samples composed largely of healthy, well-educated, high-functioning older adults who are mostly Caucasian.

    “We also note with caution that most studies of cognitive aging to date have been limited to testing samples of high functioning, highly educated, and mostly Caucasian healthy older adults.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar protective effects of education have been observed in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia, indicating some commonality with other neurodegenerative conditions.

    “Similar protective effects of education have been observed in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia50,51, indicating some commonality with other neurodegenerative conditions.”

    From Locus for severity implicates CNS resilience in progression of multiple sclerosis (2023) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Reserve section (page unavailable) describes education as promoting reserve that attenuates cognitive decline, and the paper discusses reserve in relation to Alzheimer’s disease. It does not report protective effects of education in frontotemporal dementia, so it does not support that part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neurocognitive reserve is a complex construct that is operationalized using proxies such as education, but it cannot be directly measured.

    “We caution that neurocognitive reserve is a complex construct that is operationalized using proxies such as education, but it cannot be directly measured51.”
  • These findings would be consistent with education promoting neurocognitive reserve, increasing resilience to neuronal degeneration resulting from MS injury and aging.

    “These findings would be consistent with education promoting neurocognitive reserve51, increasing resilience to neuronal degeneration resulting from MS injury and aging.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nyberg, L., Pudas, S. & Lundquist, A. in Cogntiive Neuroscience of Aging 2nd edn (eds Cabeza, R., Nyberg, L. & Park, D. C.) (Oxford Univ. Press, 2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cabeza, R., Albert, M., Belleville, S., Craik, F. I. M., Duarte, A., Grady, C. L., Lindenberger, U., Nyberg, L., Park, D. C., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Rugg, M. D., Steffener, J., & Rajah, M. N.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal (CA)
  • Baycrest Hospital (CA)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Cabeza, Roberto
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2018-10-10
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
701-710
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2896204498
Cited by
1,289
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 171 · 2025: 166 · 2024: 160 · 2023: 186 · 2022: 163 · 2021: 167 · 2020: 122 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
12.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
cognitive aging, cognitive reserve, cognitive compensation, cognitive maintenance, dementia, brain aging, functional connectivity, terminology definitions
MeSH terms
Cognitive Aging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Healthy Aging, Brain, Humans, Cognitive Reserve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-29.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-29.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review