Cited by 299Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchPesticide Exposure and ToxicityCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 71 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Republished study: long-term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerantgenetically modified maize

Open access
Séralini, Gilles-Eric, Clair, Emilie, Mesnage, Robin, Gress, Steeve, Defarge, Nicolas, Malatesta, Manuela, Hennequin, Didier, de Vendômois, Joël Spiroux·2014·Environmental Sciences Europe

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The health effects of a Roundup-tolerant NK603 genetically modified (GM) maize (from 11% in the diet), cultivated with or without Roundup application and Roundup alone (from 0.1 ppb of the full pesticide containing glyphosate and adjuvants) in drinking water, were evaluated for 2 years in rats. This study constitutes a follow-up investigation of a 90-day feeding study conducted by Monsanto in order to obtain commercial release of this GMO, employing the same rat strain and analyzing biochemical parameters on the same number of animals per group as our investigation. Our research represents the first chronic study on these substances, in which all observations including tumors are reported chronologically. Thus, it was not designed as a carcinogenicity study. We report the major findings with 34 organs observed and 56 parameters analyzed at 11 time points for most organs. RESULTS: Biochemical analyses confirmed very significant chronic kidney deficiencies, for all treatments and both sexes; 76% of the altered parameters were kidney-related. In treated males, liver congestions and necrosis were 2.5 to 5.5 times higher. Marked and severe nephropathies were also generally 1.3 to 2.3 times greater. In females, all treatment groups showed a two- to threefold increase in mortality, and deaths were earlier. This difference was also evident in three male groups fed with GM maize. All results were hormone- and sex-dependent, and the pathological profiles were comparable. Females developed large mammary tumors more frequently and before controls; the pituitary was the second most disabled organ; the sex hormonal balance was modified by consumption of GM maize and Roundup treatments. Males presented up to four times more large palpable tumors starting 600 days earlier than in the control group, in which only one tumor was noted. These results may be explained by not only the non-linear endocrine-disrupting effects of Roundup but also by the overexpression of the EPSPS transgene or other mutational effects in the GM maize and their metabolic consequences. CONCLUSION: Our findings imply that long-term (2 year) feeding trials need to be conducted to thoroughly evaluate the safety of GM foods and pesticides in their full commercial formulations.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This 2-year rat feeding study reports that NK603 GM maize, with or without Roundup, and Roundup alone at low doses produced chronic kidney and liver pathology, hormone-dependent tumors, and increased mortality compared with controls. The authors conclude that long-term feeding trials are needed to evaluate GM foods and complete pesticide formulations.

Key findings

  • Biochemical analyses found chronic kidney deficiencies across all treatments and both sexes; 76% of altered parameters were kidney-related, including 82% in treated females and 87% in GM maize-treated males.
  • In treated males, liver congestions and necrosis were 2.5 to 5.5 times higher than controls; Gamma GT hepatic activity increased up to 5.4 times in GMO + R groups, and cytochrome P450 activity increased up to 5.7 times at the highest dose.
  • Females in all treatment groups showed a two- to threefold increase in mortality, with earlier deaths; maximum differences included five times more male deaths by month 17 in the 11% GM maize group and six times greater female mortality by month 21 on 22% GM maize with or without R.
  • Females developed large mammary tumors more frequently and earlier: by month 24, 50% to 80% of treated females had tumors versus 30% of controls, and R groups had 80% affected; mammary tumor incidence was significantly increased at the lowest R dose versus controls (p < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s test). Males had up to four times more large palpable tumors starting 600 days earlier than controls, in which only one tumor was noted.

Methods

  • Two-year chronic toxicity study in Sprague-Dawley rats: 100 males and 100 females, 10 per group per sex, fed NK603 GM maize at 11%, 22%, or 33% with or without Roundup, or given Roundup in drinking water at 0.1 ppb, 0.09%, or 0.5%, alongside isogenic maize controls.
  • Observations included 34 organs and 56 parameters analyzed at 11 time points for most organs, with blood and urine biochemistry, histology, electron microscopy, organ weights, and tumor monitoring.
  • Biochemical data were analyzed by OPLS-DA using models with R2(Y) ≥ 80% and Q2(Y) ≥ 60%, with discriminant variables at 99% confidence; mammary tumor differences used Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s test.

Limitations

  • The paper states it was not designed as a carcinogenicity study and did not use the OECD-required 50 rats per sex per group; it calls for larger cohorts to confirm or refute the tumor incidence and mortality trends.
  • The authors state that further transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic analyses are needed to confirm endocrine and oxidative stress pathways, and that the total chemical composition of the GM maize was not measured in detail.
  • Evident from the text: group sizes were 10 per sex per group, limiting statistical power, and the study relied on multivariate modeling for many biochemical comparisons rather than pairwise survival analyses such as Kaplan-Meier.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12302-014-0014-5

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 Anatomopathological observations in rats fed GMO treated or not by Roundup and effects of Roundup alone. Macroscopic (A to D) and microscopic (A' and C') photographs show male left kidneys and livers (E to I) and female pituitaries (J to M), in accordance to Table 2. The number of each animal and its treatment is specified. Macroscopic pale spots (I) and microscopic necrotic foci in liver (G clear-cell focus, H basophilic focus with atypia), and marked or severe chronic progressive nephropathies, are illustrated. In females, pituitary adenomas (K to M) are shown and compared to control (J, rat number and C for control). Apostrophes after letters indicate organs from the same rat.
Figure 1 Anatomopathological observations in rats fed GMO treated or not by Roundup and effects of Roundup alone. Macroscopic (A to D) and microscopic (A' and C') photographs show male left kidneys and livers (E to I) and female pituitaries (J to M), in accordance to Table 2. The number of each animal and its treatment is specified. Macroscopic pale spots (I) and microscopic necrotic foci in liver (G clear-cell focus, H basophilic focus with atypia), and marked or severe chronic progressive nephropathies, are illustrated. In females, pituitary adenomas (K to M) are shown and compared to control (J, rat number and C for control). Apostrophes after letters indicate organs from the same rat.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Ultrastructure of hepatocytes in male rats from groups presenting the greatest degree of liver pathology. (1) Typical control rat hepatocyte (bar 2 μm except in 4). (2) Effects with Roundup at the lowest dose. Glycogen (G) is dispersed in the cytoplasm. L, lipid droplet; N, nucleus; R, rough endoplasmic reticulum. (3) Details of treatment effects with 22% dietary GMO (bar 1 μm). a, cluster of residual bodies (asterisks); b, mitochondria show many enlarged cristae (arrows). (4) Hepatocytes of animal fed GM maize (GMO) at 22% of total diet. Large lakes of glycogen occur in the cytoplasm. M, mitochondria.
Figure 2 Ultrastructure of hepatocytes in male rats from groups presenting the greatest degree of liver pathology. (1) Typical control rat hepatocyte (bar 2 μm except in 4). (2) Effects with Roundup at the lowest dose. Glycogen (G) is dispersed in the cytoplasm. L, lipid droplet; N, nucleus; R, rough endoplasmic reticulum. (3) Details of treatment effects with 22% dietary GMO (bar 1 μm). a, cluster of residual bodies (asterisks); b, mitochondria show many enlarged cristae (arrows). (4) Hepatocytes of animal fed GM maize (GMO) at 22% of total diet. Large lakes of glycogen occur in the cytoplasm. M, mitochondria.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) for biochemical data (females fed 33% GMO versus controls). (A) First, detailed examples of significant discriminant variables distribution between females fed 33% GMO (bold line) and controls (dotted line). On X axis, animals; on Y axis, serum or urine biochemical values for Na, Cl, estradiol, testosterone. (B) Wider view of OPLS-DA regression coefficients for predictive component, with jack-knifed confidence intervals at 99% confidence level, indicating discriminant parameters versus controls at month 15. U, urinary; UEx, excreted in urine during 24 h; APPT, activated partial thromboplastin time; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; PT, prothrombine time; RBC, red blood cells; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; A/G, albumin/globulin ratio; WBC, white blood cells; AST, aspartate aminotransferase. Profiles evidence kidney ion leakages and sex hormonal imbalance versus controls.
Figure 3 Orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) for biochemical data (females fed 33% GMO versus controls). (A) First, detailed examples of significant discriminant variables distribution between females fed 33% GMO (bold line) and controls (dotted line). On X axis, animals; on Y axis, serum or urine biochemical values for Na, Cl, estradiol, testosterone. (B) Wider view of OPLS-DA regression coefficients for predictive component, with jack-knifed confidence intervals at 99% confidence level, indicating discriminant parameters versus controls at month 15. U, urinary; UEx, excreted in urine during 24 h; APPT, activated partial thromboplastin time; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; PT, prothrombine time; RBC, red blood cells; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; A/G, albumin/globulin ratio; WBC, white blood cells; AST, aspartate aminotransferase. Profiles evidence kidney ion leakages and sex hormonal imbalance versus controls.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Largest non-regressive tumors in rats fed GMO treated or not by Roundup and effects of Roundup alone. Rats were fed with NK603 GM maize (with or without application of Roundup) at three different doses (11%, 22%, and 33% in their diet; thin, medium, and bold lines, respectively) compared to the substantially equivalent closest isogenic non-GM maize (control, dotted line). Roundup was administered in drinking water at three increasing doses, same symbols, environmental (A), MRL in some agricultural GMOs (B), and half of minimal agricultural levels (C), see ‘Methods’). The largest tumors were palpable during the experiment and numbered from 20 mm in diameter for males and 17.5 mm for females. Above this size, 95% of growths were non-regressive tumors. Summary of all tumors are shown in the bar histograms: black, non-regressive large tumors; white, small internal tumors; grey, metastases.
Figure 4 Largest non-regressive tumors in rats fed GMO treated or not by Roundup and effects of Roundup alone. Rats were fed with NK603 GM maize (with or without application of Roundup) at three different doses (11%, 22%, and 33% in their diet; thin, medium, and bold lines, respectively) compared to the substantially equivalent closest isogenic non-GM maize (control, dotted line). Roundup was administered in drinking water at three increasing doses, same symbols, environmental (A), MRL in some agricultural GMOs (B), and half of minimal agricultural levels (C), see ‘Methods’). The largest tumors were palpable during the experiment and numbered from 20 mm in diameter for males and 17.5 mm for females. Above this size, 95% of growths were non-regressive tumors. Summary of all tumors are shown in the bar histograms: black, non-regressive large tumors; white, small internal tumors; grey, metastases.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Examples of female mammary tumors observed. Mammary tumors are evidenced (A, D, H, representative adenocarcinoma, from the same rat in a GMO group) and in Roundup and GMO + Roundup groups, two representative rats (B, C, E, F, I, J fibroadenomas) are compared to controls. A normal representative rat in controls is not shown, only a minority of them having tumors up to 700 days, in contrast with the majority affected in all treated groups. (G) The histological control.
Figure 5 Examples of female mammary tumors observed. Mammary tumors are evidenced (A, D, H, representative adenocarcinoma, from the same rat in a GMO group) and in Roundup and GMO + Roundup groups, two representative rats (B, C, E, F, I, J fibroadenomas) are compared to controls. A normal representative rat in controls is not shown, only a minority of them having tumors up to 700 days, in contrast with the majority affected in all treated groups. (G) The histological control.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Mortality of rats fed GMO treated or not with Roundup and effects of Roundup alone. The symbols of curves and treatments are explained in the caption of Figure 4. Lifespan during the experiment for the control group is represented by the vertical bar ± SEM (grey area). In bar histograms, the causes of mortality before the grey area are detailed in comparison to the controls (0). In black are the necessary euthanasia because of suffering in accordance with ethical rules (tumors over 25% body weight, more than 25% weight loss, hemorrhagic bleeding, etc.); and in hatched areas, spontaneous mortality.
Figure 6 Mortality of rats fed GMO treated or not with Roundup and effects of Roundup alone. The symbols of curves and treatments are explained in the caption of Figure 4. Lifespan during the experiment for the control group is represented by the vertical bar ± SEM (grey area). In bar histograms, the causes of mortality before the grey area are detailed in comparison to the controls (0). In black are the necessary euthanasia because of suffering in accordance with ethical rules (tumors over 25% body weight, more than 25% weight loss, hemorrhagic bleeding, etc.); and in hatched areas, spontaneous mortality.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

75 Own result · 50 Not checked yet · 18 Own method · 16 Own interpretation · 6 No basis given

Verify all 71 references — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 56
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 21
70 of 70
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No regulatory authority requires mandatory chronic animal feeding studies for edible GMOs, or even short-term studies with blood analyses for the full commercial formulations of pesticides as sold and used, but only for the declared active principle alone.

    “Currently, no regulatory authority requires mandatory chronic animal feeding studies to be performed for edible genetically modified organisms (GMOs), or even short-term studies with blood analyses for the full commercial formulations of pesticides as sold and used, but only for the declared active principle alone.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There was no evidence in the literature on GM food safety evaluation to indicate anything to the contrary that would require a carcinogenicity study.

    “As there was no evidence in the literature on GM food safety evaluation to indicate anything to the contrary, this initial investigation was designed as a full chronic toxicity and not a carcinogenicity study.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The rat model and the 2-year chronic toxicity design are adequate to predict life-long human health impacts of GM food and complete pesticide formulations.

    “Our findings imply that long-term (2 year) feeding trials need to be conducted to thoroughly evaluate the safety of GM foods and pesticides in their full commercial formulations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    This report describes the first long-term (2-year) rodent feeding study investigating possible toxic effects from consumption of R-tolerant GM maize NK603 and a complete commercial formulation of R herbicide.

    “This report describes the first long-term (2-year) rodent (rat) feeding study investigating possible toxic effects arising from consumption of an R-tolerant GM maize (NK603) and a complete commercial formulation of R herbicide.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The tested levels correspond to levels likely to arise from consumption or environmental exposure, such as 11% GM maize in food or 50 ng/L G equivalent of R-formulation in contaminated drinking tap water.

    “This corresponds to levels likely to arise from consumption or environmental exposure, such as either 11% GM maize in food, or 50 ng/L G equivalent of R-formulation, a level which can be found in some contaminated drinking tap waters and which falls within authorized limits.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The medium dose of R treatment tested (400 mg/Kg G equivalent) corresponds to acceptable residue levels of this pesticide in some edible GMOs.

    “In this regard, it is noteworthy that the medium dose of the R treatment tested (400 mg/Kg G equivalent) corresponds to acceptable residue levels of this pesticide in some edible GMOs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The modified EPSPS enzyme drives the first step of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis in the plant shikimate pathway.

    “This enzyme is known to drive the first step of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis in the plant shikimate pathway.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    This study represents the first detailed documentation of long-term deleterious effects arising from consumption of a GMO, specifically a R-tolerant maize, and of R, the most widely used herbicide worldwide.

    “This study represents the first detailed documentation of long-term deleterious effects arising from consumption of a GMO, specifically a R-tolerant maize, and of R, the most widely used herbicide worldwide.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Non-cancerous tumors can be more lethal than cancerous tumors due to internal hemorrhaging or compression and obstruction of function of vital organs, or toxins or hormone secretions.

    “The real tumors were recorded independently of their grade, but dependent on their morbidity, since non-cancerous tumors can be more lethal than those of cancerous nature, due to internal hemorrhaging or compression and obstruction of function of vital organs, or toxins or hormone secretions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Endocrine disruptive effects are known to be non-monotonic.

    “This suggests that the observed disease may result from endocrine disruptive effects, which are known to be non-monotonic.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    DKC 2675 is the nearest isogenic non-transgenic control to NK603.

    “The varieties of maize used in this study were the DKC 2678 R-tolerant NK603 (Monsanto Corp., USA), and its nearest isogenic non-transgenic control DKC 2675.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    All secondary metabolites cannot be known and measured in the composition.

    “All secondary metabolites cannot be known and measured in the composition.”
12 of 12

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 71 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cox C: Herbicide factsheet - glyphosate. J Pesticide Reform 2004, 24: 10–15.
  2. Mesnage R, Clair E, Séralini GE: Roundup in genetically modified plants: regulation and toxicity in mammals. Theorie in der Ökologie 2010, 16: 31–33.
  3. Opinion of the scientific panel on genetically modified organisms on a requestfrom the commission related to the safety of foods and food ingredients derivedfrom herbicide-tolerant genetically modified maize NK603 for which a request forplacing on the market was submitted under Article 4 of the Novel Food Regulation(EC) No 258/97 by Monsanto (QUESTION NO EFSA-Q-2003–002) EFSA J 2003, 9: 1–14.
  4. COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended forhuman consumption Off J Eur Commun L 1998, 330(32):51298.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Séralini, G.-E., Clair, E., Mesnage, R., Gress, S., Defarge, N., Malatesta, M., Hennequin, D., & de Vendômois, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Verona (IT)
Venue
Environmental Sciences Europe
Published
2014-06-24
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
14-14
ISSN
  • 2190-4715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-4707
OpenAlex
W2143746117
Cited by
299
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 9
FWCI
36.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Sciences Europe (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
Roundup, glyphosate, NK603, genetically modified crops, chronic toxicity, kidney injury, liver necrosis, mammary tumors, pituitary tumors, sex differences, endocrine disruption, GM food safety, pesticide safety, drinking water exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review