Cited by 128Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsTraumatic Brain Injury Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 248 of the 249 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 90 of the 184 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

The Inflammatory Continuum of Traumatic Brain Injury and Alzheimer’s Disease

Open access
Kokiko-Cochran, Olga N., Godbout, Jonathan P.·2018·Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract

The post-injury inflammatory response is a key mediator in long-term recovery from traumatic brain injury (TBI). Moreover, the immune response to TBI, mediated by microglia and macrophages, is influenced by existing brain pathology and by secondary immune challenges. For example, recent evidence shows that the presence of beta-amyloid and phosphorylated tau protein, two hallmark features of AD that increase during normal aging, substantially alter the macrophage response to TBI. Additional data demonstrate that post-injury microglia are "primed" and become hyper-reactive following a subsequent acute immune challenge thereby worsening recovery. These alterations may increase the incidence of neuropsychiatric complications after TBI and may also increase the frequency of neurodegenerative pathology. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to summarize experimental studies examining the relationship between TBI and development of AD-like pathology with an emphasis on the acute and chronic microglial and macrophage response following injury. Furthermore, studies will be highlighted that examine the degree to which beta-amyloid and tau accumulation as well as pre- and post-injury immune stressors influence outcome after TBI. Collectively, the studies described in this review suggest that the brain's immune response to injury is a key mediator in recovery, and if compromised by previous, coincident, or subsequent immune stressors, post-injury pathology and behavioral recovery will be altered.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) neuroinflammation, mediated by microglia and macrophages, is a malleable continuum shaped by pre-existing Alzheimer’s disease (AD)-like pathology and by pre- or post-injury immune challenges. It synthesizes experimental and clinical evidence that beta-amyloid and tau accumulation alter the macrophage response to TBI, and that transient microglial/macrophage modulation may influence recovery and AD-like pathology.

Key findings

  • TBI induces a conserved microglial/macrophage response; chronic microglial and astrocytic reactivity persists in subcortical regions months to years post-injury, with human evidence of increased OX-6/CD68 mRNA at 1 year and PK-[11C](R)PK11195 binding between 11 months and 17 years post-injury.
  • Pre-injury peripheral immune challenge can be protective: a single i.p. LPS dose (0.1 mg/kg) 5 days before controlled cortical impact reduced CD68, increased IL-6, decreased contusion volume, and improved behavioral recovery; LPS (1.0 mg/kg for 4 days) reduced neuronal death and lesion volume after lateral cryogenic brain injury.
  • Post-injury immune challenge worsens recovery: LPS at 30 days post-injury after midline fluid percussion injury exaggerated MHC-II, IL-1β, and TNFα expression and depressive-like behavior; LPS 5 days post-injury after impact acceleration was associated with depressive-like behavior and cognitive impairments 3 months post-injury.
  • Aβ and tau modify the macrophage response: TBI in APP/PS1 mice delayed peak cytokine elevations by 7 days; R1.40 AD-model mice showed a muted acute macrophage response and significant tissue loss between 3 and 120 days post-injury; hTau TBI mice showed enhanced acute macrophage response and, at 120 days post-injury, increased tau pathology and persistent macrophage response correlating with memory-task deficits. CSF1R inhibition after a chronic hippocampal lesion improved behavioral recovery and increased dendritic spines.

Methods

  • Narrative review summarizing experimental and clinical studies on TBI, neuroinflammation, and AD-like pathology, with emphasis on acute and chronic microglial and macrophage responses.
  • Discusses animal TBI models including controlled cortical impact, fluid percussion injury, weight drop, penetrating ballistic-brain injury, closed head injury, cryogenic injury, and a chronic hippocampal lesion model, as well as transgenic AD/tau models.
  • Draws on human epidemiological, neuropathological, imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid studies; no systematic review, meta-analysis, or primary data collection is reported.

Limitations

  • The paper states that global TBI reporting and categorization are not standardized; experimental models each reflect a specific TBI type and do not fully recapitulate human TBI; more than 30 phase-III clinical trials have failed to improve secondary injury outcomes; some experimental studies fail to show TBI induces or worsens AD-related pathology; transgenic AD models express mutant APP/tau at nonphysiological levels and clinical co-occurrence of TBI and APP mutation is rare; no universal repetitive TBI model exists; inter-injury macrophage changes are not defined; and the distinct roles of microglia versus monocytes remain unclear.
  • The paper also states that the role of soluble Aβ oligomers and tau oligomers in post-injury pathology is understudied, and that cell-specific inflammatory profiles are not routinely performed in transgenic mice before TBI.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it lacks a systematic search strategy, formal quality appraisal, or quantitative synthesis, and its conclusions rely on heterogeneous animal models, injury severities, and outcome measures.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00672

Cites

248 of 248 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

90 of 184 cited sources checked · 39 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 137 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 65
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 18
78 of 78
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The molecular mechanisms that link TBI to development of neurodegenerative disease remain underexplored and few studies account for age-specific pathological response to and recovery from brain injury.

    “The molecular mechanisms that link TBI to development of neurodegenerative disease remain underexplored and few studies account for age-specific pathological response to and recovery from brain injury.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The roles of monocyte sub-populations in mediating outcome from TBI remain unknown without detailed follow-up studies.

    “Without detailed follow-up studies, the roles of monocyte sub-populations in mediating outcome from TBI remain unknown.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The role of soluble Aβ oligomers in post-injury pathology has received limited attention.

    “Surprisingly, the role of soluble Aβ oligomers in post-injury pathology has received limited attention.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No single experimental TBI model recapitulates all aspects of human TBI.

    “While no single model recapitulates all aspects of human TBI, the neuroinflammatory response to injury occurs in a temporally distinct manner.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from rodent models of TBI and AD are informative about human TBI-AD pathology.

    “the relevance of these abnormal proteins as mediators of response to and recovery from TBI remains applicable.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The presence of Aβ and tau pathology in animal models is relevant to human AD.

    “the relevance of these abnormal proteins as mediators of response to and recovery from TBI remains applicable.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Both TBI and AD are complex neurodegenerative pathologies that elicit a central and peripheral immune response.

    “Both TBI and AD are complex neurodegenerative pathologies that elicit a central and peripheral immune response.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a specific cascade of inflammatory events that occur after TBI.

    “Certainly, there is a specific cascade of inflammatory events that occur after TBI, but these studies indicate that subtle alterations in this response are possible and can influence outcome.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The severity of repetitive TBI is typically referred to as 'mild,' but the number of injuries varies from 2 to 10 across several days or weeks.

    “While severity of repetitive TBI is typically referred to as “mild,” the number of injuries varies from 2 to 10 across several days or weeks.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Aβ and tau phosphorylation are reported in normal aging.

    “Both Aβ and tau phosphorylation are reported in normal aging and could, therefore, influence the brain’s response to TBI without causing AD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Multiple mouse models of AD display an altered inflammatory response to TBI.

    “Given that multiple mouse models of AD display an altered inflammatory response to TBI, it is possible that accumulation of pathological proteins alters the neuroinflammatory environment in a way influences the brain’s response to injury.”
11 of 11

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Study year conflicts with its reference

    Minor

    The text calls reference 142 a 2013 study, while the reference entry dates it to 2012.

  • Rat-study description cites a mouse study

    Minor

    The text groups reference 186 among studies reporting these findings in rats, but reference 186 identifies its subjects as mice.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 249 references

1 of the 249 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Alzheimer, 1907, Uber eine eigenartige Erkrankung der Hirnrinde. Allg. Zeitschrift fur Psychiatr, Und Psych Medizin, 64, 146

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–128 of 128

Metadata

Authors
Kokiko-Cochran, O. N., & Godbout, J. P.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2018-04-09
Volume
9
Pages
672-672
ISSN
1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2797989008
Cited by
128
References
249
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R56-NS090311, R01-AG-51902)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, Alzheimer's disease, neuroinflammation, microglia, macrophages, amyloid-beta, tau phosphorylation, microglial priming, neurodegeneration, neuropsychiatric complications, injury recovery
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Humans, Inflammation, Macrophages, tau Proteins, Amyloidogenic Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-30, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-30 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review