Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 507

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 504 of the 504 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Allergic rhinitis – 2023

Open access
Wise, Sarah K., Damask, Cecelia, Roland, Lauren T., Ebert, Charles, Levy, Joshua M., Lin, Sandra, Luong, Amber, Rodriguez, Kenneth, Sedaghat, Ahmad R., Toskala, Elina, Villwock, Jennifer, Abdullah, Baharudin, Akdis, Cezmi, Alt, Jeremiah A., Ansotegui, Ignacio J., Azar, Antoine, Baroody, Fuad, Benninger, Michael S., Bernstein, Jonathan, Brook, Christopher, Campbell, Raewyn, Casale, Thomas, Chaaban, Mohamad R., Chew, Fook Tim, Chambliss, Jeffrey, Cianferoni, Antonella, Custovic, Adnan, Davis, Elizabeth Mahoney, DelGaudio, John M., Ellis, Anne K., Flanagan, Carrie, Fokkens, Wytske J., Franzese, Christine, Greenhawt, Matthew, Gill, Amarbir, Halderman, Ashleigh, Hohlfeld, Jens M., Incorvaia, Cristoforo, Joe, Stephanie A., Joshi, Shyam, Kuruvilla, Merin Elizabeth, Kim, Jean, Klein, Adam M., Krouse, Helene J., Kuan, Edward C., Lang, David, Larenas‐Linnemann, Desiree, Laury, Adrienne M., Lechner, Matt, Lee, Stella E., Lee, Victoria S., Loftus, Patricia, Marcus, Sonya, Marzouk, Haidy, Mattos, Jose, McCoul, Edward, Melen, Erik, Mims, James W., Mullol, Joaquim, Nayak, Jayakar V., Oppenheimer, John, Orlandi, Richard R., Phillips, Katie, Platt, Michael, Ramanathan, Murugappan, Raymond, Mallory, Rhee, Chae‐Seo, Reitsma, Sietze, Ryan, Matthew, Sastre, Joaquin, Schlosser, Rodney J., Schuman, Theodore A., Shaker, Marcus S., Sheikh, Aziz, Smith, Kristine A., Soyka, Michael B., Takashima, Masayoshi, Tang, Monica, Tantilipikorn, Pongsakorn, Taw, Malcolm B., Tversky, Jody, Tyler, Matthew A., Veling, Maria C., Wallace, Dana, Wang, De Yun, White, Andrew, Zhang, Luo·2023·International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
DOI 10.1002/alr.23090
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: In the 5 years that have passed since the publication of the 2018 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2018), the literature has expanded substantially. The ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update presents 144 individual topics on allergic rhinitis (AR), expanded by over 40 topics from the 2018 document. Originally presented topics from 2018 have also been reviewed and updated. The executive summary highlights key evidence‐based findings and recommendation from the full document. Methods: ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 employed established evidence‐based review with recommendation (EBRR) methodology to individually evaluate each topic. Stepwise iterative peer review and consensus was performed for each topic. The final document was then collated and includes the results of this work. Results: ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 includes 10 major content areas and 144 individual topics related to AR. For a substantial proportion of topics included, an aggregate grade of evidence is presented, which is determined by collating the levels of evidence for each available study identified in the literature. For topics in which a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention is considered, a recommendation summary is presented, which considers the aggregate grade of evidence, benefit, harm, and cost. Conclusion: The ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update provides a comprehensive evaluation of AR and the currently available evidence. It is this evidence that contributes to our current knowledge base and recommendations for patient evaluation and treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alr.23090

Cites

504 of 504 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Wise, S. K., Damask, C., Roland, L. T., Ebert, C., Levy, J. M., Lin, S., Luong, A., Rodriguez, K., Sedaghat, A. R., Toskala, E., Villwock, J., Abdullah, B., Akdis, C., Alt, J. A., Ansotegui, I. J., Azar, A., Baroody, F., Benninger, M. S., Bernstein, J., Brook, C., Campbell, R., Casale, T., Chaaban, M. R., Chew, F. T., Chambliss, J., Cianferoni, A., Custovic, A., Davis, E. M., DelGaudio, J. M., Ellis, A. K., Flanagan, C., Fokkens, W. J., Franzese, C., Greenhawt, M., Gill, A., Halderman, A., Hohlfeld, J. M., Incorvaia, C., Joe, S. A., Joshi, S., Kuruvilla, M. E., Kim, J., Klein, A. M., Krouse, H. J., Kuan, E. C., Lang, D., Larenas‐Linnemann, D., Laury, A. M., Lechner, M., Lee, S. E., Lee, V. S., Loftus, P., Marcus, S., Marzouk, H., Mattos, J., McCoul, E., Melen, E., Mims, J. W., Mullol, J., Nayak, J. V., Oppenheimer, J., Orlandi, R. R., Phillips, K., Platt, M., Ramanathan, M., Raymond, M., Rhee, C., Reitsma, S., Ryan, M., Sastre, J., Schlosser, R. J., Schuman, T. A., Shaker, M. S., Sheikh, A., Smith, K. A., Soyka, M. B., Takashima, M., Tang, M., Tantilipikorn, P., Taw, M. B., Tversky, J., Tyler, M. A., Veling, M. C., Wallace, D., Wang, D. Y., White, A., & Zhang, L.
Venue
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-03-06
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
293-859
ISSN
  • 2042-6976 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-6984
DOI
10.1002/alr.23090
OpenAlex
W4323304861
Cited by
507
References
504
FWCI
75.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.