The DOI matches its Crossref record.
User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, the technology acceptance model (TAM) emphasizes increased recognition of the utility of a new technology, leading to increased use (Davis, 1989(Davis, , 1993)).”
From Cheating in the second year of generative AI chatbots: a follow-up study on high school student cheating behaviors (2026) · cites this paper as Davis, 1993
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 · Cited by 8,721
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x · Cited by 8,159
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231
Self-citationAgarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250951 · Cited by 4,726
Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior
Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(01)00056-2 · Cited by 3,219
Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 · Cited by 2,458
Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology
Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1999.11518247 · Cited by 1,951
Lowry, P. B., & Gaskin, J. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2014.2312452 · Cited by 1,901
A Holistic Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth Technologies
van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E., Nijland, N., van Limburg, M., Ossebaard, H. C., Kelders, S. M., Eysenbach, G., & Seydel, E. R. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1672 · Cited by 1,126
A Review of the Predictors, Linkages, and Biases in IT Innovation Adoption Research
Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056 · Cited by 1,136
Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers
Teo, T. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006 · Cited by 1,009
Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test
Teo, T. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008 · Cited by 914
Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM
Ngai, E. W. T., Poon, J. K. L., & Chan, Y. H. C. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.007 · Cited by 813
Development of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ)
Parmanto, B., Lewis, Jr., Graham, K. M., & Bertolet, M. H. (2016) · International Journal of Telerehabilitation · doi:10.5195/ijt.2016.6196 · Cited by 624
“Questionnaire items on ease of use and learnability were also borrowed from TAM, and items on usefulness were also taken from TAM and use similar wording.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings
Ma, Q., & Liu, L. (2004) · Journal of Organizational and End User Computing · doi:10.4018/joeuc.2004010104 · Cited by 660
Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/17465660710834453 · Cited by 624
Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2011.10782576 · Cited by 584
Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2003.822468 · Cited by 582
Self-citationIt's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model
Yang, H.-D., & Yoo, Y. (2004) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(03)00062-9 · Cited by 578
Al-Gahtani, S. S., & King, M. (1999) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/014492999119020 · Cited by 519
Ammenwerth, E., Iller, C., & Mahler, C. (2006) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-6-3 · Cited by 459
Kim, J., & Park, H.-A. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2143 · Cited by 475
Albayati, H., Kim, S. K., & Rho, J. J. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101320 · Cited by 464
Lampropoulos, G., Keramopoulos, E., Diamantaras, K., & Evangelidis, G. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12136809 · Cited by 462
What drives FinTech adoption? A multi-method evaluation using an adapted technology acceptance model
Singh, S., Sahni, M. M., & Kovid, R. K. (2020) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-09-2019-1318 · Cited by 433
Bidmon, S., & Terlutter, R. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4127 · Cited by 389
Determining causes and severity of end-user frustration
Ceaparu, I., Lazar, J., Bessiere, K., Robinson, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2004) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327590ijhc1703_3 · Cited by 399
Beyond usability: Designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety
Karsh, B.-T. (2004) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.010322 · Cited by 414
Effect of brand familiarity, experience and information on online apparel purchase
Park, J., & Stoel, L. (2005) · International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management · doi:10.1108/09590550510581476 · Cited by 348
Fan, W., Liu, J., Zhu, S., & Pardalos, P. M. (2020) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2818-y · Cited by 346
User engagement in mental health apps: A review of measurement, reporting, and validity
Ng, M. M., Firth, J., Minen, M., & Torous, J. (2019) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201800519 · Cited by 293
Zhang, P. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.1.11 · Cited by 331
Tiwari, C. K., Bhat, M. A., Khan, S. T., Subramaniam, R., & Khan, M. A. I. (2024) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-04-2023-0061 · Cited by 315
A review and a framework of handheld computer adoption in healthcare
Lu, Y.-C., Xiao, Y., Sears, A., & Jacko, J. A. (2005) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.03.001 · Cited by 315
Cho, Y. C., & Sagynov, E. (2015) · International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS) · doi:10.19030/ijmis.v19i1.9086 · Cited by 313
Conversational commerce: entering the next stage of AI-powered digital assistants
Balakrishnan, J., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04049-5 · Cited by 301
Kim, J., Merrill, K., Xu, K., & Sellnow, D. D. (2020) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1801227 · Cited by 288
Social media addiction: What is the role of content in YouTube?
Balakrishnan, J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.6.2017.058 · Cited by 266
Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review
Li, J., Talaei-Khoei, A., Seale, H., Ray, P., & MacIntyre, C. R. (2013) · interactive Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.2196/ijmr.2468 · Cited by 250
Gamal Aboelmaged, M. (2010) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635571011030042 · Cited by 240
Exploring consumers’ intention to accept smartwatch
Wu, L.-H., Wu, L.-C., & Chang, S.-C. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.005 · Cited by 226
Gold, R., Cottrell, E., Bunce, A., Middendorf, M., Hollombe, C., Cowburn, S., Mahr, P., & Melgar, G. (2017) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170046 · Cited by 215
Kukafka, R., Johnson, S. B., Linfante, A., & Allegrante, J. P. (2003) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2003.09.002 · Cited by 206
Tong, X. (2010) · International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management · doi:10.1108/09590551011076524 · Cited by 196
TSIKNAKIS, M., & KOUROUBALI, A. (2009) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.07.001 · Cited by 167
Is Trust Important in Technology Adoption? A Policy Capturing Approach
Bahmanziari, T., Pearson, J. M., & Crosby, L. (2003) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2003.11647533 · Cited by 162
Persuasiveness of expert systems
Dijkstra, J. J., Liebrand, W. B. G., & Timminga, E. (1998) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/014492998119526 · Cited by 161
Enterprise resource planning adoption and satisfaction determinants
Costa, C. J., Ferreira, E., Bento, F., & Aparicio, M. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.090 · Cited by 161
An Evaluation of Gamified Training: Using Narrative to Improve Reactions and Learning
Armstrong, M. B., & Landers, R. N. (2017) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878117703749 · Cited by 158
Theory of user acceptance of information technologies: an examination of health care professionals
Succi, M. J., & Walter, Z. D. (2003) · Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers · doi:10.1109/hicss.1999.773013 · Cited by 145
Park, N. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01440.x · Cited by 141
Ruxwana, N. L., Herselman, M. E., & Conradie, D. P. (2010) · Health Information Management Journal · doi:10.1177/183335831003900104 · Cited by 137
Attitudinal and Intentional Acceptance of Domestic Robots by Younger and Older Adults
Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02710-9_5 · Cited by 134
Teacher Training Institute, M., Cheok, M. L., Wong, S. L., & Faculty of Educational Studies, U. P. M. (2015) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.12973/iji.2015.816a · Cited by 127
Chen, I. J., Yang, K.-F., Tang, F.-I., Huang, C.-H., & Yu, S. (2008) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.11.011 · Cited by 124
Rosli, M. S., Saleh, N. S., Md. Ali, A., Abu Bakar, S., & Mohd Tahir, L. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141811389 · Cited by 126
Bunjak, A., Černe, M., & Popovič, A. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103533 · Cited by 127
First Impressions in Human--Agent Virtual Encounters
Cafaro, A., Vilhjálmsson, H. H., & Bickmore, T. (2016) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2940325 · Cited by 120
Clinton-McHarg, T., Yoong, S. L., Tzelepis, F., Regan, T., Fielding, A., Skelton, E., Kingsland, M., Ooi, J. Y., & Wolfenden, L. (2016) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0512-5 · Cited by 116
Laver, K., George, S., Ratcliffe, J., & Crotty, M. (2012) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2011.593682 · Cited by 112
Alshare, K. A., & Lane, P. L. (2011) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.02834 · Cited by 102
Clinical acceptance of a low-cost portable system for postural assessment
Van Schaik, P., Bettany-Saltikov, J. A., & Warren, J. G. (2002) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449290110107236 · Cited by 93
Integrating Augmented Reality, Gamification, and Serious Games in Computer Science Education
Lampropoulos, G., Keramopoulos, E., Diamantaras, K., & Evangelidis, G. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13060618 · Cited by 94
A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification
Serenko, A. (2008) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.04.004 · Cited by 92
Understanding applicants’ reactions to gamified recruitment
Buil, I., Catalán, S., & Martínez, E. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.041 · Cited by 85
Wang, Y., Zhu, Q., Krikke, H., & Hazen, B. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120275 · Cited by 89
Why continue sharing: Determinants of behavior in ridesharing services
Arteaga-Sánchez, R., Belda-Ruiz, M., Ros-Galvez, A., & Rosa-Garcia, A. (2020) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.1177/1470785318805300 · Cited by 84
Staggers, N., & Kobus, D. (2000) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.2000.0070164 · Cited by 72
Brown, D. H., & Thompson, S. (2011) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2011.3 · Cited by 73
Digital wellbeing tools through users lens
Almourad, M. B., Alrobai, A., Skinner, T., Hussain, M., & Ali, R. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101778 · Cited by 69
Kim, E.-H., Coumar, A., Lober, W. B., & Kim, Y. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine · doi:10.1109/titb.2011.2107561 · Cited by 65
Kim, K. J. (2016) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0136 · Cited by 60
Yeow, P. H. P., & Loo, W. H. (2009) · International Journal of Electronic Government Research · doi:10.4018/jegr.2009040103 · Cited by 53
Balaskas, S., Panagiotarou, A., & Rigou, M. (2022) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci12040129 · Cited by 51
Liu, Y.-L. E., & Huang, Y.-M. (2025) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2311975 · Cited by 47
Ahmadi, H., Nilashi, M., Shahmoradi, L., Ibrahim, O., Sadoughi, F., Alizadeh, M., & Alizadeh, A. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.021 · Cited by 47
User acceptance of inter-organizational electronic medical records
Handy, J., Hunter, I., & Whiddett, R. (2001) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/146045820100700208 · Cited by 39
Turner, J., Brown, J. C., & Carpenter, D. T. (2018) · Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/jpm.12440 · Cited by 37
Bai, X., Guo, R., & Gu, X. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12343-x · Cited by 36
Van Schaik, P., Flynn, D., Van Wersch, A., Douglass, A., & Cann, P. (2004) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929041000669941 · Cited by 32
Alwahaishi, S., & Snášel, V. (2013) · International Journal of E-Adoption · doi:10.4018/jea.2013040103 · Cited by 28
Variations in the Use of mHealth Tools: The VA Mobile Health Study
Frisbee, K. L. (2016) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.3726 · Cited by 25
Ukoha, O., Okorie Awa, H., A. Nwuche, C., & Asiegbu, I. (2011) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management · doi:10.28945/1431 · Cited by 20
Customer adoption of Neobank services from a technology acceptance perspective–evidence from Hungary
Faculty of Economics, U. O. M., Nagy, S., Molnár, L., Faculty of Economics, U. O. M., Papp, A., & Faculty of Economics, U. O. M. (2023) · Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering · doi:10.31181/dmame712024883 · Cited by 19
Sun, S., Xiong, C., & Chang, V. (2019) · International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems · doi:10.4018/ijeis.2019010102 · Cited by 11
Acceptance of AI-Powered Chatbots Among Physiotherapy Students: International Cross-Sectional Study
El-Sobkey, S. B., Kelini, K. I., ElKholy, M., Abdeldayem, T., Abdallah, M., Mohamed, D. A.-A., Fawzy, A., Ahmed, Y. F., El Khatib, A., Khalid, H., et al. (2025) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/76574 · Cited by 11
“In line with TAM’s 3-stage process [21], external factors play a crucial role in shaping students’ acceptance of AI-PCs.”
InfluentialRamirez, M., Wu, S., Ryan, G., Towfighi, A., & Vickrey, B. G. (2017) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.7106 · Cited by 9
Unveiling the Future of FinTech: Exploring the Behavioral Intentions Behind FinTech Adoption
Kurucz, A., Vinkóczi, T., Tamás, B., & Idziak, E. (2025) · Journal of Risk and Financial Management · doi:10.3390/jrfm18100546 · Cited by 9
Chen, R., Lee, V. R., Kuo, A. C., Pope, D. C., & Miles, S. (2026) · Educational technology research and development · doi:10.1007/s11423-026-10587-1 · Cited by 8
Marsha Sarengat, L., & Mahadwartha, P. A. (2021) · Business and Finance Journal · doi:10.33086/bfj.v6i2.2164 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, F. D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 475-487
- ISSN
- 0020-7373
- Cited by
- 2,964
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review