Cited by 269Stress Responses and CortisolNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 172 of the 174 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 97 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Gene–environment interactions: early life stress and risk for depressive and anxiety disorders

Open access

Abstract

Rationale Prior reviews have examined how stress, broadly defined, interacts with genetic diathesis in the pathogenesis of internalizing (i.e., depressive and anxiety) disorders. Recent findings have suggested a unique role for early life stress (ELS) in the development of internalizing disorders, contributing to the rapid proliferation of research in this area.Objective This paper critically reviews studies in humans examining gene-environment interaction (GxE) effects of ELS on the risk for depression and anxiety, primarily from a candidate gene perspective. Major methodological challenges that are unique to such studies are considered.Results The majority of published studies have focused on candidates that regulate the serotonin system, especially the serotonin transporter. More recent work has addressed interactions of ELS with candidates from the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and neurotrophin system. Available studies vary greatly with respect to definitions of ELS, examination of gene-gene interactions, consideration of gender effects, and attention to analytic limitations.Conclusions Overall, there is support for GxE effects of ELS on the risk for depressive and anxiety outcomes. Future studies of ELS in this context will require careful attention to methodologic considerations. Such studies would benefit from more systematic assessment of positive environmental factors (e.g., social support) and greater utilization of developmentally sensitive paradigms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-010-2151-x

Cites

172 of 172 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

70 Not checked yet · 10 No basis given · 9 Own interpretation · 3 Own method · 2 Own result · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 95 references — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 30
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 8
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
37 of 37
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Common diseases are influenced by common genetic variants.

    “Candidate gene research is predicated on the assumption that common diseases are influenced by common genetic variants”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Early life stress does not invariably lead to dysfunction and is not a specific risk factor for any particular disorder.

    “ELS does not invariably lead to dysfunction, nor is it a specific risk factor for any particular disorder.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    An increasingly accepted gene–environment model assumes that genes may interact with environmental influences on both ends of the spectrum, with risk and resilience resulting from exposure to negative and positive environments, respectively.

    “Finally, an increasingly accepted GxE model assumes genes may interact with environmental influences on both ends of the spectrum, with risk and resilience resulting from exposure to negative and positive environments, respectively.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some types of adversity commonly co-occur, while others, such as sexual abuse, may occur in isolation.

    “A further complication is that some types of adversity commonly co-occur, while others, such as sexual abuse, may occur in isolation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Identified stressors may occur in the context of additional adversity that is not consistently identified or examined.

    “Moreover, identified stressors may occur in the context of additional adversity that is not consistently identified or examined.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 174 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Nugent, N. R., Tyrka, A. R., Carpenter, L. L., & Price, L. H.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Nugent, Nicole R.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2011-01-12
Volume
214
Issue
1
Pages
175-196
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2094951488
Cited by
269
References
174
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 17
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH087240, R01MH083704, R01MH068767)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
gene-environment interaction, early life stress, depression, anxiety disorders, internalizing disorders, candidate genes, serotonin transporter, serotonergic system, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, neurotrophins, gene-gene interaction, sex differences, social support
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review