Cited by 583Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressExercise and Physiological ResponsesGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 235 of the 237 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ageing, age-related diseases and oxidative stress: What to do next?

Open access
Luo, Jiao, Mills, Kevin, le Cessie, Saskia, Noordam, Raymond, van Heemst, Diana·2020·Ageing Research Reviews

Abstract

Among other mechanisms, oxidative stress has been postulated to play an important role in the rate of ageing. Oxidative damage contributes to the hallmarks of ageing and essential components in pathological pathways which are thought to drive multiple age-related diseases. Nonetheless, results from studies testing the hypothesis of oxidative stress in ageing and diseases showed controversial results. While observational studies mainly found detrimental effects of high oxidative stress levels on disease status, randomized clinical trials examining the effect of antioxidant supplementation on disease status generally showed null effects. However, re-evaluations of these counterinitiative observations are required considering the lack of reliability and specificity of traditionally used biomarkers for measuring oxidative stress. To facilitate these re-evaluations, this review summarizes the basic knowledge of oxidative stress and the present findings regarding the role of oxidative damage in ageing and age-related diseases. Meanwhile, two approaches are highlighted, namely proper participants selection, together with the development of reliable biomarkers. We propose that oxidized vitamin E metabolites may be used to accurately monitor individual functional antioxidant level, which might serve as promising key solutions for future elucidating the impact of oxidative stress on ageing and age-related diseases.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arr.2019.100982

Cites

235 of 235 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 237 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 583

Metadata

Authors
Luo, J., Mills, K., le Cessie, S., Noordam, R., & van Heemst, D.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
Venue
Ageing Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
57
Pages
100982
ISSN
1568-1637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2985538915
Cited by
581
References
237
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 29
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ageing Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Velux Stiftung (1156)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Keywords
oxidative stress, aging, age-related diseases, oxidative damage, antioxidant supplementation, oxidative stress biomarkers
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Antioxidants, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Oxidative Stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review