CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsDigital Mental Health Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 227 of the 227 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do depressive symptoms affect the outcome of treatments for SAD? A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials

Rozen, Naama, Aderka, Idan M.·2020·Clinical Psychology Review
DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101874
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Individuals with social anxiety disorder (SAD) typically have elevated depressive symptoms. In the present meta-analysis, we reviewed the treatment outcome literature in SAD and examined whether depressive symptoms predict treatment outcome. We focused on randomized controlled trials of cognitive behavior therapy (individual face-to-face, group format, and internet-delivered format) and randomized controlled trials of pharmacotherapy. After implementing exclusion criteria, 108 studies with 133 treatment conditions (n = 12,913 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Our findings indicated that treatments for SAD were efficacious and significantly reduced social anxiety symptoms across all treatment modalities. Exclusion of individuals with MDD or high levels of depression did not affect outcome at post-treatment or at follow-up. However, we found that elevated depressive symptoms were associated with greater reductions in social anxiety symptoms from pre-treatment to post-treatment. Importantly, this effect was above and beyond pre-treatment levels of social anxiety. Finally, analyzing treatment modalities separately, we found that depressive symptoms were associated with better post-treatment outcomes in individual face-to-face CBT but not in other modalities. Clinical and research implications of these findings are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101874

Cites

227 of 227 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mattick, 1998, Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety, Behaviour Research and Therapy

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rozen, N., & Aderka, I. M.
Affiliations
University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Aderka, Idan M.
ORCID
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
80
Pages
101874
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101874
OpenAlex
W3033778489
Cited by
5
References
227
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Haifa
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, depressive symptoms, treatment outcomes, cognitive behavioral therapy, group cognitive behavioral therapy, pharmacotherapy, major depressive disorder, comorbidities, treatment response
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review