The DOI matches its Crossref record; 327 of the 328 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet; 146 of the 390 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder
Open accessAbstract
Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members: Steven Batki, MD Daniel Ciccarone, MD, MPH Scott Hadland, MD, MPH Brian Hurley, MD (Co-Chair) Kimberly Kabernagel, DO Frances Levin, MD James McKay, PhD Larissa Mooney, MD (Co-Chair) Siddarth Puri, MD Andrew Saxon, MD Kevin Sevarino, MD, PhD Kevin Simon, MD, MPH Timothy Wiegand, MD ASAM Team: Maureen Boyle, PhD Amanda Devoto, PhD Sarah Framnes-DeBoer Taleen Safarian AAAP Team: Kathryn Cates-Wessel Michelle Dirst IRETA Team: Dawn Lindsay, PhD Piper Lincoln, MS Jillian Helmick Peter Luongo, PhD Funding: The development of this guideline was generously funded with contract support from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). ASAM and AAAP are honored that this clinical practice guideline has been endorsed by: American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) American Society for Adolescent Psychiatry (ASAP) American Society of Addiction Nursing (ASAN) Abstract: The American Society of Addiction Medicine/American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry (ASAM/AAAP) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder provides guidance on evidence-based strategies for the treatment of stimulant use disorders (StUDs), stimulant intoxication, and stimulant withdrawal, as well as secondary and tertiary prevention of harms associated with stimulant use. The Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) comprised experts from ASAM and AAAP representing a range of clinical settings and patient populations. The guideline was developed following modified GRADE methodology. The process included a systematic literature review as well as several targeted supplemental searches. The CGC utilized Evidence to Decision tables to review available evidence and rate the strength of each recommendation. The clinical practice guideline was revised based on external stakeholder review. Key takeaways included: Contingency management represents the current standard of care for treatment of StUDs; Pharmacotherapies may be utilized off-label to treat StUDs; Acute stimulant intoxication can result in life-threatening complications that should be addressed in an appropriate level of care; Secondary and tertiary prevention strategies should be used to reduce harms related to risky stimulant use. Keywords: Stimulant Use Disorder, Clinical Guideline, Addiction Treatment, Stimulant Intoxication, Prevention - TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Purpose 2 Background 2 Key Takeaways 2 Summary of Recommendations 3 Treatment of Stimulant Use Disorder Recommendations 3 Stimulant Intoxication and Withdrawal Recommendations 6 Secondary and Tertiary Prevention Recommendations 8 Introduction 10 Purpose 10 Background 10 Scope of Guideline 10 Intended Audience 10 Qualifying Statement 10 Methodology 11 Overview of Approach 11 GRADE Methodology 11 Literature Review 11 Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 12 Primary Literature Search 12 Gray Literature Search 12 Literature Extraction 12 Guideline Development 12 Rating Outcomes 13 Rating Quality of Evidence 13 Developing Evidence to Decision Tables 13 Developing Recommendation Statements 13 Approving the Recommendations 13 Rating the Strength of Recommendations 13 Developing the Guideline Document 13 Engaging Stakeholders 14 Treatment of Stimulant Use Disorder 14 Assessment 14 Initial Assessment 14 Comprehensive Assessment 14 Behavioral Treatment 16 Contingency Management 16 Community Reinforcement Approach 17 Cognitive Behavioral Therapy 17 Matrix Model 17 Behavioral Treatment Recommendations 17 Technology-Based Interventions 18 Continuing Care 19 Pharmacotherapy 19 Non-Psychostimulant Medications 19 Psychostimulant Medications 22 Co-occurring Disorders 24 General Guidance 24 Concurrent Management of StUD and ADHD 25 Population-Specific Considerations 26 Adolescents and Young Adults 26 Pregnant and Postpartum Patients 30 Additional Population-Specific Considerations 31 Stimulant Intoxication and Withdrawal 33 Assessment and Diagnosis 34 Initial and Comprehensive Assessment 34 Assessment and Diagnosis Recommendations 36 Setting Determination 37 Setting Determination Recommendations 37 Managing Stimulant Intoxication and Withdrawal 37 Stimulant Intoxication 37 Stimulant Withdrawal 43 Monitoring 43 Suicidality 43 Managing Stimulant Intoxication and Withdrawal in Pregnant Patients 43 Secondary and Tertiary Prevention 44 Screening 44 Screening Recommendations 44 Assessment 44 Assessment Recommendations 45 Early Intervention for Risky Stimulant Use 45 Interventions to Reduce Risky Stimulant Use 45 Referral to Treatment for Stimulant Use Disorder 46 Harm Reduction 46 Harm Reduction Education 46 Overdose Prevention and Reversal 46 Safer Sexual Practices and Contraception 47 Injection Drug Use 47 HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis 48 Oral Health 48 Nutrition 48 Bibliography 48 Appendix A. Glossary of Terms A1 Appendix B. Abbreviations and Acronyms A4 Appendix C. Differential Diagnosis for Agitation and Psychosis A9 Appendi
Verified 2026-10-05 · 1 reference not checked yet
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
88 Couldn’t confirm · 76 Sources not found · 76 Own interpretation · 61 No basis given · 57 No full text of the sources · 26 Not checked yet · 24 Partly supported · 18 Own method · 14 Own result · 4 Supported · 2 Not supported · accuracy not yet measured
At least one cited source doesn’t support this claim or points to a different paper, and none confirmed it — see the verdicts below.
In the paper
“A systematic review that evaluated reviews covering various psychosocial and pharmacological interventions for StUD found that CM was the only efficacious intervention. 43”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Behavioral Treatment
What the sources say
- Disputedcites [43] 43. AshaRani PV, Hombali A, Seow E, Ong WJ, Tan JH, Subramaniam M. Nonpharmacological interventions for methamphetamine use disorder: A systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;212:108060. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108060 [PubMed: 32445927] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract says this review assessed trials and non-randomised studies of non-pharmaceutical interventions, not reviews of psychosocial and pharmacological treatments. Its Conclusion explicitly identifies CM, CBT and exercise as efficacious for methamphetamine use disorder, contrary to the claim that CM was the only efficacious intervention. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Disputed
At least one cited source doesn’t support this claim or points to a different paper, and none confirmed it — see the verdicts below.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of 13 studies of behavioral interventions that co-targeted mental health, alcohol and/or drug use, and sexual risk behavior among gay and bisexual men found a small positive effect on reducing substance use and sexual risk behavior.220”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity:
What the sources say
- Disputedcites [220] 220. Ye T, Sun D, Dong G, et al. The effect of methamphetamine abuse on dental caries and periodontal diseases in an Eastern China city. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):8. doi:10.1186/ s12903-017-0463-5 [PubMed: 29321070] 326. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Disputed
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Further, injection stimulant use puts people at risk for infectious diseases, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and viral hepatitis, as well as other infectious complications such as infective endocarditis.11”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Background
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [11] 11. Ciccarone D. Stimulant abuse: pharmacology, cocaine, methamphetamine, treatment, attempts at pharmacotherapy. Prim Care. 2011;38(1):41-58. doi:10.1016/j.pop.2010.11.004 [PubMed: 21356420] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Clinical features > HIV section (page unavailable) states that injection and needle sharing increase HIV transmission risk and that injection risk behaviors increase transmission risk for HCV and HBV. The available passages do not mention infective endocarditis; searches for that term and for bacterial infection found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Others may be unaware that the stimulants they use are contaminated with fentanyl or other opioids.10”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Background
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [10] 10. Ciccarone D. The rise of illicit fentanyls, stimulants and the fourth wave of the opioid overdose crisis. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2021;34(4):344-350. doi:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000717 [PubMed: 33965972] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The “fourth wave: Stimulants in combination” section reports co-use of stimulants and opioids and deaths involving both. It does not say that stimulants were contaminated with fentanyl or other opioids, or that people were unaware of such contamination (searched for unaware use and contaminated stimulants). (LLM, conf=0.75)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A growing number of people with opioid use disorder (OUD) are using stimulants intentionally.9”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Background
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [9] 9. Han B, Compton WM, Jones CM, Einstein EB, Volkow ND. Methamphetamine Use, Methamphetamine Use Disorder, and Associated Overdose Deaths Among US Adults. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(12):1329. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2588 [PubMed: 34550301] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction says methamphetamine use is increasing among people who misuse opioids, and the Results report an upward trend in methamphetamine–opioid co-use. Neither establishes that the people have opioid use disorder or that their stimulant use is intentional; the Discussion explicitly describes co-use as occurring “knowingly or unknowingly.” No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Many factors influence the progression of StUD, including the potency and pharmacokinetics of the stimulants used, frequency of use, route of administration, and age of first use, among others.19,20”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 1.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [19] 19. Robinson S, Adinoff B. The Classification of Substance Use Disorders: Historical, Contextual, and Conceptual Considerations. Behav Sci. 2016;6(3):18. doi:10.3390/bs6030018 [PubMed: 27548233] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 5.3 (Cocaine; page not provided) discusses cocaine’s pharmacological effects and reports the prevalence of cocaine use disorder, but does not connect those effects to disorder progression. Searches for potency, pharmacokinetics, use frequency, administration route, and age at first use found no passage addressing their influence on stimulant use disorder progression. (LLM, conf=0.72)
- Partly supportedcites [20] 20. Ducci F, Goldman D. The Genetic Basis of Addictive Disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2012;35(2):495-519. doi:10.1016/j.psc.2012.03.010 [PubMed: 22640768] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s opening section says progression toward problematic use is influenced by age at first use, the agent’s psychoactive properties and pharmacokinetics, and mode of administration. It also links repetitive exposure to the development of addiction. These passages discuss addiction and substance use disorders generally, however, rather than establishing the full list specifically for stimulant use disorder; they do not explicitly identify stimulant potency or frequency of use as factors. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“less than 10% of addiction treatment programs utilize CM. 47”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Behavioral Treatment
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [47] 47. DeFulio A. Dissemination of Contingency Management for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder. Perspect Behav Sci. 2023;46(1):35-49. doi:10.1007/s40614-022-00328-z [PubMed: 37006603] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The “CM Dissemination Barriers Overcome by Technology” section says adoption by outpatient substance abuse treatment clinics has been slow and that most treatment professionals have never delivered CM. It does not give a percentage of addiction treatment programs using CM, so it does not support the specific “less than 10%” figure. No page number was provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Clinicians and other staff may initially resist adopting CM due to misconceptions that CM is rewarding people for substance use and, thus, inappropriate.48,54”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [48] 48. Oluwoye O, Kriegel L, Alcover KC, McPherson S, McDonell MG, Roll JM. The dissemination and implementation of contingency management for substance use disorders: A systematic review. Psychol Addict Behav. 2020;34(1):99-110. doi:10.1037/adb0000487 [PubMed: 31259569] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies limited provider understanding of CM as a barrier to implementation, supporting the general point that staff perceptions may hinder adoption. It does not say that clinicians or other staff resist CM because they believe it rewards substance use or is inappropriate. The Introduction instead describes CM as rewarding targeted behaviors such as abstinence. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [54] 54. Ducharme LJ, Knudsen HK, Abraham AJ, Roman PM. Counselor Attitudes toward the Use of Motivational Incentives in Addiction Treatment: Counselor Attitudes toward Motivational Incentives. Am J Addict. 2010;19(6):496-503. doi:10.1111/j.1521-0391.2010.00081.x [PubMed: 20958844] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says counselors’ attitudes toward CM can be negative and uninformed, and the Discussion (page unavailable) reports negative reactions to tangible prizes for abstinence. The paper does not report that clinicians or other staff resist CM because they believe it rewards substance use or is therefore inappropriate. (LLM, conf=0.86)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Multiple systematic reviews have shown positive effects of CM on methamphetamine use, 44,45”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Behavioral Treatment
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [44] 44. Bentzley BS, Han SS, Neuner S, Humphreys K, Kampman KM, Halpern CH. Comparison of Treatments for Cocaine Use Disorder Among Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(5):e218049. doi:10/gjw4ck [PubMed: 33961037] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that this meta-analysis found a positive association between contingency management and reduced cocaine use, and says earlier meta-analyses suggested benefits for cocaine use. It does not report positive effects on methamphetamine use, the drug specified in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [45] 45. Herbeck DM, Hser YI, Teruya C. Empirically supported substance abuse treatment approaches: A survey of treatment providers' perspectives and practices. Addict Behav. 2008;33(5):699-712. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.12.003 [PubMed: 18207334] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Research has demonstrated that patients with StUD who have not achieved their treatment goals during the initial phase of treatment may benefit from extended treatment with EBIs to facilitate long-term recovery.95,99,103,104”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 8.
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [95] 95. McKay JR, Lynch KG, Coviello D, et al. Randomized trial of continuing care enhancements for cocaine-dependent patients following initial engagement. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010;78(1):111. doi:10.1037/a0018139 [PubMed: 20099956] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page not provided) reports that adding contingency management, particularly with relapse prevention, benefited cocaine-dependent patients and that effects persisted after treatment. But the participants had already achieved initial engagement and, in many cases, abstinence; the Limitations section says it is unclear whether the results would apply to patients who did not remain in initial treatment. The paper therefore does not establish the claimed benefit for patients who had not achieved initial treatment goals. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [99] 99. Karno M, Farabee D, Brecht ML, Rawson R. Patient Reactance Moderates the Effect of Directive Telephone Counseling for Methamphetamine Users. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012;73(5):844-850. doi:10.15288/jsad.2012.73.844 [PubMed: 22846250] 104. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Method describes telephone aftercare following intensive outpatient treatment, and the Discussion suggests ongoing contacts may help sustain gains. But the study did not identify patients who had failed to meet initial treatment goals, and its observed benefit was limited to the 3-month follow-up rather than demonstrated long-term recovery (Discussion; page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [103] 103. Shoptaw S, Heinzerling KG, Rotheram-Fuller E, et al. Bupropion hydrochloride versus placebo, in combination with cognitive behavioral therapy, for the treatment of cocaine abuse/dependence. J Addict Dis. 2008;27(1):13-23. doi:10.1300/J069v27n01_02 109. source
- Could not verifycites [104] 104. Hajizadeh A, Howes S, Theodoulou A, et al. Antidepressants for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;5(5):CD000031. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000031.pub6 110. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Description of studies; page unavailable) discuss treatment duration and follow-up for smoking cessation, not extended treatment for patients with stimulant use disorder who missed initial treatment goals. A References entry mentions a study of smoking cessation in stimulant-dependent individuals, but does not report the claimed benefit. Searches for initial treatment goals and extended treatment found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
- Probably not a substantial claim. 124
- It may state two separate claims as one. 138
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The precipitous increase in novel and designer drugs (eg, cathinones, amphetamines) in the market complicates the clinical picture.3”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Background
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [3] 3. Luethi D, Liechti ME. Designer drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effects. Arch Toxicol. 2020;94(4):1085-1133. doi:10.1007/s00204-020-02693-7 [PubMed: 32249347] source
The Introduction says the number of available designer drugs is constantly growing and that newly emerging drugs may evade routine screening while information about their adverse effects is often scarce. Those points support the paraphrase that their growing availability complicates clinical assessment, although the paper does not quantify the rate of increase. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Guideline was developed using the GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for producing recommendations in health care.12”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > GRADE Methodology-The
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [12] 12. GRADE Working Group, Moberg J, Oxman AD, et al. The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16(1):45. doi:10.1186/s12961-018-0320-2 [PubMed: 29843743] source
The Background presents the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework as a method for making health system and public health recommendations and decisions. The citation supports the identification of the framework used; it does not need to document the citing authors’ own guideline-development process. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Beyond the mortality risk, StUD can also lead to long-term health problems, including cardiac, pulmonary, psychiatric, dental, nutritional, and dermatologic issues, as well as cognitive impairment.11”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Background
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [11] 11. Ciccarone D. Stimulant abuse: pharmacology, cocaine, methamphetamine, treatment, attempts at pharmacotherapy. Prim Care. 2011;38(1):41-58. doi:10.1016/j.pop.2010.11.004 [PubMed: 21356420] source
The Medical complications section describes cardiac and pulmonary disease, psychotic symptoms, and dental decay, and notes malnutrition as a possible lifestyle-related contributor to adverse outcomes. The Chronic use section describes skin picking and cognitive impairment that may persist for months after abstinence. Together, these passages support the cited sentence’s broad description of possible long-term problems, though the pathways are not all direct effects of stimulant use. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“A recent report by the Motivational Incentives Policy Group-a stakeholder coalition of CM experts in policy, research, and legal analysis-outlines”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [48] 48. Oluwoye O, Kriegel L, Alcover KC, McPherson S, McDonell MG, Roll JM. The dissemination and implementation of contingency management for substance use disorders: A systematic review. Psychol Addict Behav. 2020;34(1):99-110. doi:10.1037/adb0000487 [PubMed: 31259569] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section on Training Strategies discusses a NIDA/SAMHSA Motivational Incentives training package, not a report by the Motivational Incentives Policy Group. Searches for the group, OIG Final Rule, and legal guardrails found no passage in our copy addressing the attributed report or its guidance; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.75)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Contingency management (CM) has demonstrated the best effectiveness in the treatment of stimulant use disorders (StUDs) compared to any other intervention studied and represents the current standard of care.”
- Also stated in: § Behavioral Treatment · boosted
“CM has demonstrated the best effectiveness in the treatment of StUDs compared to any other intervention studied and represents the current standard of care.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Behavioral Treatment
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [43] 43. AshaRani PV, Hombali A, Seow E, Ong WJ, Tan JH, Subramaniam M. Nonpharmacological interventions for methamphetamine use disorder: A systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;212:108060. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108060 [PubMed: 32445927] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that contingency management had better outcomes than other methods for methamphetamine use disorder, and the Results describe it as having the strongest evidence among the interventions reviewed. The paper does not establish that it is the most effective intervention for all stimulant use disorders or identify contingency management specifically as the current standard of care; its conclusion recommends behavioural interventions more broadly as first-line treatment for methamphetamine use disorder. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [44] 44. Bentzley BS, Han SS, Neuner S, Humphreys K, Kampman KM, Halpern CH. Comparison of Treatments for Cocaine Use Disorder Among Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(5):e218049. doi:10/gjw4ck [PubMed: 33961037] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page not provided) reports that contingency management was the only treatment category consistently associated with a significant reduction in objectively measured cocaine use. The study concerns cocaine use disorder, not stimulant use disorders generally. It also does not establish contingency management as the current standard of care: the Introduction says there is an absence of a standard treatment for cocaine use disorder, and the Discussion calls for considering broader implementation. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [45] 45. Herbeck DM, Hser YI, Teruya C. Empirically supported substance abuse treatment approaches: A survey of treatment providers' perspectives and practices. Addict Behav. 2008;33(5):699-712. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.12.003 [PubMed: 18207334] source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [46] 46. Rawson RA, Erath TG, Chalk M, et al. Contingency Management for Stimulant Use Disorder: Progress, Challenges, and Recommendations. J Ambulatory Care Manage. 2023;46(2):152-159. doi:10.1097/JAC.0000000000000450 [PubMed: 36745163] source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Behavioral Treatment · boosted
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Some published protocols exist for voucher-and prize-based interventions, 59,60 as well as some introductory trainings.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [59] 59. Pfund RA, Ginley MK, Rash CJ, Zajac K. Contingency management for treatment attendance: A meta-analysis. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022;133:108556. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108556 [PubMed: 34210566] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Study characteristics; page unavailable) describe voucher- and prize-based contingency-management protocols used in published studies. The Discussion describes a 1.5-day training and training for initial proficiency. The paper does not establish that standalone intervention protocols or introductory training materials were published. (LLM, conf=0.77)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [60] 60. Higgins ST, Sigmon SC, Wong CJ, et al. Community Reinforcement Therapy for Cocaine-Dependent Outpatients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60(10):1043-1052. doi:10.1001/ archpsyc.60.9.1043 [PubMed: 14557150] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“In December 2020, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) published clarification-known as the”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [53] 53. Kirby KC, Carpenedo CM, Stitzer ML, et al. Is exposure to an effective contingency management intervention associated with more positive provider beliefs? J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012;42(4):356- 365. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2011.09.004 [PubMed: 22116009] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses contingency management’s effectiveness and providers’ reluctance to adopt it, while the Methods (page unavailable) describes tangible incentives. Searches for the Office of Inspector General, the Anti-Kickback Statute, December 2020, and case-by-case legal guidance found no passage addressing the claimed clarification. This 2012 paper cannot document an announcement made in 2020. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Montana, Washington, and California have all begun state-funded pilot programs that implement CM.48”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [48] 48. Oluwoye O, Kriegel L, Alcover KC, McPherson S, McDonell MG, Roll JM. The dissemination and implementation of contingency management for substance use disorders: A systematic review. Psychol Addict Behav. 2020;34(1):99-110. doi:10.1037/adb0000487 [PubMed: 31259569] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Study Characteristics; page unavailable) describe statewide CM implementation efforts in South Carolina and New York, but do not address state-funded pilot programs in Montana, Washington, or California. Searches for those states and for state-funded CM pilots found no passage supporting the claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“There is strong evidence that CM is an effective intervention for increasing treatment engagement and reducing stimulant use.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Behavioral Treatment
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [43] 43. AshaRani PV, Hombali A, Seow E, Ong WJ, Tan JH, Subramaniam M. Nonpharmacological interventions for methamphetamine use disorder: A systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;212:108060. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108060 [PubMed: 32445927] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that CM consistently reduced drug use and improved treatment retention during treatment for methamphetamine use disorder. The claim extends that finding to stimulant use generally; this review’s own findings concern methamphetamine, and it says the durability of the benefits after treatment is not well studied. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [44] 44. Bentzley BS, Han SS, Neuner S, Humphreys K, Kampman KM, Halpern CH. Comparison of Treatments for Cocaine Use Disorder Among Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(5):e218049. doi:10/gjw4ck [PubMed: 33961037] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion report that contingency management was consistently associated with reduced urinalysis-confirmed cocaine use. The paper does not establish that it increases treatment engagement, and its finding concerns cocaine rather than stimulant use generally. Its Conclusions also caution that the broad analysis limited the strength of its conclusions. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [45] 45. Herbeck DM, Hser YI, Teruya C. Empirically supported substance abuse treatment approaches: A survey of treatment providers' perspectives and practices. Addict Behav. 2008;33(5):699-712. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.12.003 [PubMed: 18207334] source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [46] 46. Rawson RA, Erath TG, Chalk M, et al. Contingency Management for Stimulant Use Disorder: Progress, Challenges, and Recommendations. J Ambulatory Care Manage. 2023;46(2):152-159. doi:10.1097/JAC.0000000000000450 [PubMed: 36745163] source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Bupropion is contraindicated in individuals with history of seizure or anorexia or bulimia nervosa and should be used with caution in individuals with elevated seizure risk.111”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Non-Psychostimulant Medications Cocaine Use Disorder
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [111] 111. Trivedi MH, Walker R, Ling W, et al. Bupropion and naltrexone in methamphetamine use disorder. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(2):140-153. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2020214 [PubMed: 33497547] 122. Vivitrol [Package Insert]. Alkermes, Inc; 1984. 123. Elkashef A, Kahn R, Yu E, et al. Topiramate for the treatment of methamphetamine addiction: a multi-center placebo-controlled trial. Addict Abingdon Engl. 2012;107(7):1297- 1306. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03771.x 124. Remeron [Medication Guide]. Organon Inc; 1997. 125. Jilani TN, Gibbons JR, Faizy RM, Saadabadi A. Mirtazapine. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Sta sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods > Participants section (page unavailable) says the trial excluded people with conditions that increased seizure risk, supporting the need for caution. It does not state that bupropion is contraindicated for people with a history of seizures, anorexia nervosa, or bulimia nervosa; the abstract’s mention of anorexia is an adverse event, not that contraindication. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Patients who do not have ready access to a computer and the internet and/or who have low computer literacy could find these interventions difficult to access, disproportionately impacting patients with lower socioeconomic status.93”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Implementation Considerations:
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [93] 93. Farabee D, Cousins SJ, Brecht ML, et al. A comparison of four telephone-based counseling styles for recovering stimulant users. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013;27(1):223-229. doi:10.1037/a0029572 [PubMed: 22867295] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract and Discussion describe telephone-based counseling for recovering stimulant users, not interventions requiring a computer or internet connection. Searches of our copy for computer and internet access, computer literacy, and socioeconomic barriers found no passage addressing the claimed access disparity. (LLM, conf=0.76)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“CBT4CBT and TES appear to improve stimulant use outcomes when added to other behavioral interventions; however, these effects are not always durable.82,83”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 5.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [82] 82. Kelpin SS, Parlier-Ahmad AB, Jallo N, Carroll K, Svikis DS. A pilot randomized trial of CBT4CBT for women in residential treatment for substance use disorders. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021;132:108622. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108622 [PubMed: 34538690] source
- Partly supportedcites [83] 83. Carroll KM, Ball SA, Martino S, Nich C, Babuscio TA, Rounsaville BJ. Enduring Effects of a Computer-Assisted Training Program For Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A six- month follow-up of CBT4CBT. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;100(1-2):178-181. doi:10.1016/ j.drugalcdep.2008.09.015 [PubMed: 19041197] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Methods describe CBT4CBT as an adjunct to standard outpatient treatment in a mixed substance-dependent sample, and the Results report improved drug-use outcomes. The paper does not establish a stimulant-specific effect or evaluate TES. Its Discussion reports CBT4CBT benefits lasting up to six months, so this source does not support a lack of durability for CBT4CBT. (LLM, conf=0.87)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“CBT4CBT has been shown to be effective as a standalone treatment in a few studies, but this is insufficient evidence to recommend it as a standalone treatment.81,83,92”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Implementation Considerations:
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [81] 81. Kiluk BD. Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Substance Use Disorders: A Summary of the Evidence and Potential Mechanisms of Behavior Change. Perspect Behav Sci. 2019;42(3):465-478. doi:10.1007/s40614-019-00205-2 [PubMed: 31976445] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘Efficacy as a Virtual Stand-Alone Treatment’ section describes two trials in which CBT4CBT was the principal treatment, accompanied by brief weekly clinical monitoring. The Summary and Discussion calls this virtual stand-alone approach efficacious, but the paper does not say the evidence is insufficient to recommend it. Nor do the trials establish efficacy without monitoring. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [83] 83. Carroll KM, Ball SA, Martino S, Nich C, Babuscio TA, Rounsaville BJ. Enduring Effects of a Computer-Assisted Training Program For Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A six- month follow-up of CBT4CBT. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;100(1-2):178-181. doi:10.1016/ j.drugalcdep.2008.09.015 [PubMed: 19041197] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction reports efficacy for CBT4CBT as an adjunct to standard outpatient treatment, and the Methods state that every participant received standard treatment. The Discussion reports enduring benefit for that adjunctive use. The paper does not establish efficacy as a standalone treatment in a few studies or make a recommendation about standalone use. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not matchedcites [92] 92. American Psychiatric Association. App Advisor: An American Psychiatric Association Initiative. Accessed July 3, 2023. https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/mental-health-apps 95.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“CM interventions have used webcams and mobile applications to promote cessation of nicotine/tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use.51,88”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 5.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [51] 51. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General. Medicare and state health care programs: Fraud and abuse; Revisions to safe harbors under the anti-kickback statute, and civil monetary penalty rules regarding beneficiary inducements; Final rule. Fed Regist. 2020;85(232):77684-77895.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites [88] 88. DeFulio A, Brown HD, Davidson RM, Regnier SD, Kang N, Ehart M. Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Smartphone-Based Contingency Management Intervention for Buprenorphine Adherence. Behav Anal Pract. 2023;16(2):450-458. doi:10.1007/ s40617-022-00730-8 [PubMed: 37187840] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods (page unavailable) describe a smartphone app previously evaluated to promote drug abstinence in people with opioid use disorder. This study used the app to promote buprenorphine adherence, not cessation; our copy does not support the claim about webcam use or nicotine/tobacco and alcohol cessation. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“These applications allow for standardized implementation, reduced staff burden, and increased access to care.76,77”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 5.
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [76] 76. Schaub M, Sullivan R, Haug S, Stark L. Web-based cognitive behavioral self-help intervention to reduce cocaine consumption in problematic cocaine users: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(6):e166. doi:10/gj7qwc [PubMed: 23192752] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says web-based self-help programs can reach otherwise hidden groups through a low treatment threshold, supporting increased access. The Methods > Interventions section describes a structured, computer-delivered sequence of modules, consistent with standardized delivery. The paper does not establish that these applications reduce staff burden; its cost-benefit statement does not specifically address staffing. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [77] 77. Tait RJ, McKetin R, Kay-Lambkin F, et al. Six-Month Outcomes of a Web-Based Intervention for Users of Amphetamine-Type Stimulants: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(4):e105. doi:10/gn763w [PubMed: 25925801] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods (Design; no page available) describe a fully automated, three-module intervention, and the Introduction says web-based interventions could extend access. The Discussion (Implications; no page available) says the program might lower the burden on service providers. The paper does not explicitly establish standardized implementation or demonstrate a reduction in staff burden; it presents the latter as a possibility. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“studies have found significant reductions in substance use and improved retention in treatment using CBT4CBT relative to in-person CBT.81,83”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 5.
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [81] 81. Kiluk BD. Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Substance Use Disorders: A Summary of the Evidence and Potential Mechanisms of Behavior Change. Perspect Behav Sci. 2019;42(3):465-478. doi:10.1007/s40614-019-00205-2 [PubMed: 31976445] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The “Efficacy as a Virtual Stand-Alone Treatment” section reports that CBT4CBT had the best outcomes for retention and substance use in a trial that included therapist-delivered CBT. But it says the trial was not powered for a direct comparison between those treatments; the reported greater reduction in substance use was relative to treatment as usual, not in-person CBT. No page number is supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.89)
- Partly supportedcites [83] 83. Carroll KM, Ball SA, Martino S, Nich C, Babuscio TA, Rounsaville BJ. Enduring Effects of a Computer-Assisted Training Program For Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A six- month follow-up of CBT4CBT. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;100(1-2):178-181. doi:10.1016/ j.drugalcdep.2008.09.015 [PubMed: 19041197] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction reports longer abstinence and fewer drug-positive urine specimens with CBT4CBT added to treatment as usual, and the Abstract Results report a significant difference in drug-use trends. But Methods §2.1 identifies the comparator as treatment as usual, not in-person CBT; the paper discusses retention as a predictor of later drug-use outcomes, not as an outcome improved by CBT4CBT. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“One RCT of a mixed population of patients with cocaine and methamphetamine use disorders found positive effects on reduced substance use, suggesting that telemedicine may be effective in the treatment of methamphetamine use disorder.95”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Implementation Considerations:
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [95] 95. McKay JR, Lynch KG, Coviello D, et al. Randomized trial of continuing care enhancements for cocaine-dependent patients following initial engagement. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010;78(1):111. doi:10.1037/a0018139 [PubMed: 20099956] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page not provided) reports better cocaine-use outcomes for participants who received incentives. But the study describes its participants as cocaine-dependent and its interventions as contingency management and relapse prevention, not telemedicine; it does not establish an effect for methamphetamine use disorder. (LLM, conf=0.88)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“It is known to have several molecular actions, including blocking voltage-dependent sodium channels, increasing gamma-aminobutyric acid A (GABA-A) receptor activity, antagonizing some glutamate receptor subtypes, and inhibiting carbonic anhydrase.112,113”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [112] 112. Coffin PO, Santos GM, Hern J, et al. Effects of mirtazapine for methamphetamine use disorder among cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men: A placebo- controlled randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;77(3):246-255. doi:10.1001/ jamapsychiatry.2019.3655 [PubMed: 31825466] 127. Colfax GN, Santos GM, Das M, et al. Mirtazapine to reduce methamphetamine use: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(11):1168-1175. doi:10.1001/ archgenpsychiatry.2011.124 [PubMed: 22065532] 128. source
- Could not verifycites [113] 113. Alam A, Voronovich Z, Carley JA. A review of therapeutic uses of mirtazapine in psychiatric and medical conditions. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2013;15(5):PCC.13r01525. doi:10.4088/ PCC.13r01525 129. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Pharmacologic Properties section describes mirtazapine’s receptor actions, not topiramate’s. Searches of our full-text copy for topiramate, sodium channels, GABA-A, and carbonic anhydrase found no passage addressing the claimed mechanisms. This source therefore does not verify the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Topiramate can cause appetite suppression; this is an important consideration when treating patients who are underweight or at risk of being underweight.115”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > c.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [115] 115. Hashemian SM, Farhadi T. A review on modafinil: the characteristics, function, and use in critical care. J Drug Assess. 2020;9(1):82-86. doi:10.1080/21556660.2020.1745209 [PubMed: 32341841] 131. Battleday RM, Brem AK. Modafinil for cognitive neuroenhancement in healthy non-sleep- deprived subjects: A systematic review. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;25(11):1865-1881. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.07.028 [PubMed: 26381811] 132. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Drug-drug interactions sections discuss modafinil and other medications, but no passage addresses topiramate or its effect on appetite. Searches for “topiramate” and “appetite suppression weight loss” found no relevant passage, so the underweight-patient consideration cannot be verified from this copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Mirtazapine is an FDA-approved medication for the treatment of MDD that acts at multiple sites, including adrenergic, serotonergic, and histaminergic receptors.124,125”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > a.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [124] 124. Hides L, Quinn C, Stoyanov S, Kavanagh D, Baker A. Psychological interventions for co- occurring depression and substance use disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;2019(11). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009501.pub2 148. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section discusses antidepressant use during psychological-treatment studies but does not identify mirtazapine. Searches of our copy for mirtazapine, FDA approval, and the named receptor types found no passage addressing its approval or mechanism of action; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.77)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [125] 125. Hunt GE, Siegfried N, Morley K, Brooke-Sumner C, Cleary M. Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse. Cochrane Schizophrenia Group, ed. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Published online December 12, 2019. doi:10/ggfhzg 149. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“The desirable effects of topiramate are somewhat offset by known side effects (eg, cognitive effects, paresthesia) and variable tolerability, which can be improved by slow titration.115”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > c.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [115] 115. Hashemian SM, Farhadi T. A review on modafinil: the characteristics, function, and use in critical care. J Drug Assess. 2020;9(1):82-86. doi:10.1080/21556660.2020.1745209 [PubMed: 32341841] 131. Battleday RM, Brem AK. Modafinil for cognitive neuroenhancement in healthy non-sleep- deprived subjects: A systematic review. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;25(11):1865-1881. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.07.028 [PubMed: 26381811] 132. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Side effects of modafinil and Modafinil tolerance sections discuss modafinil, not topiramate. Searches for topiramate, cognitive effects, paresthesia, and slow titration found no passage in our copy addressing the attributed claim; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“It is FDA-approved to treat depression, may also help treat anxiety and improve sleep quality, and has no known potential for misuse.128”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > a.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [128] 128. Indave BI, Minozzi S, Pani PP, Amato L. Antipsychotic medications for cocaine dependence. Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group, ed. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Published online March 19, 2016. doi:10/f8gwnx 152. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Our copy’s ‘(03) Olanzapine versus placebo’ section reports no significant difference in anxiety scores for olanzapine, not mirtazapine. Searches for ‘mirtazapine’ and ‘anxiety and improve sleep quality’ found no passage addressing whether mirtazapine may help treat anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.76)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“The desirable effects of topiramate are somewhat offset by known side effects (eg, cognitive effects, paresthesia) and variable tolerability, which can be improved by slow titration.115”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [115] 115. Hashemian SM, Farhadi T. A review on modafinil: the characteristics, function, and use in critical care. J Drug Assess. 2020;9(1):82-86. doi:10.1080/21556660.2020.1745209 [PubMed: 32341841] 131. Battleday RM, Brem AK. Modafinil for cognitive neuroenhancement in healthy non-sleep- deprived subjects: A systematic review. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;25(11):1865-1881. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.07.028 [PubMed: 26381811] 132. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s Side effects of modafinil and Modafinil tolerance sections discuss modafinil, not topiramate. Searches for topiramate, paresthesia, cognitive effects, and slow titration found no passage in our copy addressing the attributed claim; the paper’s discussion of adjusting modafinil dosage does not establish it for topiramate. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Reductions in SUD severity were also found, suggesting improvements in SUD-related consequences and functioning.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > c.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [118] 118. Fischler PV, Soyka M, Seifritz E, Mutschler J. Off-label and investigational drugs in the treatment of alcohol use disorder: A critical review. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:927703. doi:10.3389/ fphar.2022.927703 [PubMed: 36263121] 139. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.2.2 (Topiramate; page unavailable) discusses reduced drinking and alcohol craving in alcohol use disorder, not severity in amphetamine-type stimulant use disorder. Searches for stimulant use disorder and SUD-related consequences or functioning found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Partly supportedcites [119] 119. Burnette EM, Nieto SJ, Grodin EN, et al. Novel Agents for the Pharmacological Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder. Drugs. 2022;82(3):251-274. doi:10.1007/s40265-021-01670-3 [PubMed: 35133639] 140. Nazarova VA, Sokolov AV, Chubarev VN, Tarasov VV, Schiöth HB. Treatment of ADHD: Drugs, psychological therapies, devices, complementary and alternative methods as well as the trends in clinical trials. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1066988. doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.1066988 [PubMed: 36467081] 141. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Repurposed Agents section reports that topiramate reduced alcohol drinking and improved some self-reported drinking-related outcomes in people with alcohol use disorder. It does not report reduced SUD severity in amphetamine-type stimulant use disorder or establish improvements in functioning for that population. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.79)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“The exact mechanism of action of modafinil is unclear, though in vitro studies have shown that it modulates multiple neurotransmitter systems, including dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine reuptake, as well as histamine and hypocretin signaling.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Cocaine Use Disorder
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [130] 130. Richards JR, Garber D, Laurin EG, et al. Treatment of cocaine cardiovascular toxicity: a systematic review. Clin Toxicol Phila Pa. 2016;54(5):345-364. doi:10/gfv25h 154. source
- Could not verifycites [131] 131. Kishi T, Matsuda Y, Iwata N, Correll CU. Antipsychotics for cocaine or psychostimulant dependence: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(12):e1169-1180. doi:10/gn76x9 [PubMed: 24434105] 155. Chan B, Freeman M, Ayers C, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of medications for stimulant use disorders in patients with co-occurring opioid use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;216:108193. doi:10/gn764j [PubMed: 32861136] 156. Kelly TM, Daley DC. Integrated treatment of substance use and psychiatric disorders. Soc Work sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section “Neurological and Psychological Interaction of SUD and Non-SUD Psychiatric Disorders” discusses dopamine in drugs of abuse and serotonin in alcohol and ecstasy, not modafinil. Searches for modafinil, its proposed in vitro mechanism, histamine, and hypocretin found no passage addressing the claim in our copy; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“These medications increase the release of dopamine and norepinephrine and inhibit the reuptake of these neurotransmitters.135”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 17.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [135] 135. Zaso MJ, Park A, Antshel KM. Treatments for Adolescents With Comorbid ADHD and Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review. J Atten Disord. 2020;24(9):1215-1226. doi:10.1177/1087054715569280 [PubMed: 25655767] 161. Food and Drug Administration. FDA updating warnings to improve safe use of prescription stimulants used to treat ADHD and other conditions. Accessed July 12, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updating-warnings- improve-safe-use-prescription-stimulants-used-treat-adhd-and-other-conditions 162. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Review of Existing Pharmacological Treatment Research identifies mixed amphetamine salts as stimulants, and its Summary says extended-release forms have not been systematically evaluated. Neither section describes dopamine or norepinephrine release or reuptake; searches for those mechanisms found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“While a systematic review showed mixed results, 142 these may have been impacted by insufficient dosing”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [142] 142. Manning V, Arunogiri S, Frei M, et al. Alcohol and Other Drug Withdrawal: Practice Guidelines. 3rd ed. Turning Point; 2018. 185. Bagley SM, Schoenberger SF, dellaBitta V, et al. Ambivalence and stigma beliefs about medication treatment among young adults with opioid use disorder: A qualitative exploration of young adults' perspectives. J Adolesc Health Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med. 2023;72(1):105-110. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.08.026 186. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion describes stigma and ambivalence about medications for opioid use disorder; its mention of a systematic review concerns barriers to that treatment, not ADHD. Searches for psychostimulants, ADHD symptoms, mixed results, and insufficient dosing found no passage addressing the claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“No difference was noted on treatment retention.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [136] 136. Mariani JJ, Mariani JJ, Levin FR. Treatment Strategies for Co-Occurring ADHD and Substance Use Disorders. Am J Addict. 2007;16(s1):45-56. doi:10.1080/10550490601082783 [PubMed: 17453606] 163. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2021 NSDUH Detailed Tables. Published 2023. Accessed August 22, 2023. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2021-nsduh- detailed-tables 164. Austic EA. Peak ages of risk for starting nonmedical use of prescription stimulants. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;152:224-229. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.03.034 [PubMed: 25908322] 165. Guerin A, Kim J. Age sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction discusses methylphenidate trials and stimulant treatment of substance use disorders, but does not report a treatment-retention comparison for methylphenidate in amphetamine-type stimulant use disorder. Searches for retention and for a methylphenidate-versus-placebo difference found no passage addressing that outcome; the retention passages concern ADHD, cognitive deficits, or other populations. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plain- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Modafinil is generally well tolerated, and the two meta-analyses reported no significant differences in the rate of serious or other adverse events.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Cocaine Use Disorder
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [132] 132. Torrens M, Rossi PC, Martinez-Riera R, Martinez-Sanvisens D, Bulbena A. Psychiatric Co- Morbidity and Substance Use Disorders: Treatment in Parallel Systems or in One Integrated System? Subst Use Misuse. 2012;47(8-9):1005-1014. doi:10.3109/10826084.2012.663296 [PubMed: 22676568] 158. source
- Could not verifycites [133] 133. Rohner H, Gaspar N, Philipsen A, Schulze M. Prevalence of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) among Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Populations: Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1275. doi:10.3390/ijerph20021275 [PubMed: 36674031] 159. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods (§§2.3–2.4) describe extracting ADHD prevalence and substance-use data, and the Results (§3.2) report prevalence estimates; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. Searches for modafinil and for serious or other adverse events found no passage addressing its tolerability or adverse-event rates. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Methylphenidate (MPH) inhibits the reuptake of norepinephrine and dopamine and is FDA-approved for the treatment of ADHD and narcolepsy.143,144”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [143] 143. Schoenberger SF, Park TW, dellaBitta V, Hadland SE, Bagley SM. "My Life Isn't Defined by Substance Use": Recovery Perspectives Among Young Adults with Substance Use Disorder. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(4):816-822. doi:10.1007/s11606-021-06934-y 187. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Treatment Improvement Protocols (TIP) 33: Treatment for Stimulant Use Disorders. PEP21-02-01004. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA); 2021. Accessed July 13, 2022. https:// store.samhsa.gov/product/treatment-for-stimulant-use-disorders/PEP21-02-01-004 188. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (p. 2) identifies the paper’s subject as young adults’ perspectives on recovery from substance use disorder, and the Discussion (p. 5) addresses treatment goals. Searches of our full-text copy for methylphenidate, its reuptake mechanism, and FDA approval for ADHD or narcolepsy found no passage addressing the cited claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [144] 144. Levy S, Siqueira LM, Committee on Substance Abuse, et al. Testing for drugs of abuse in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2014;133(6):e1798-1807. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-0865 [PubMed: 24864184] 189. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Two meta-analyses found no effect on sustained cocaine abstinence but a positive effect on cocaine abstinence rates at the end of the treatment trial in patients treated with modafinil.132,133”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Cocaine Use Disorder
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [132] 132. Torrens M, Rossi PC, Martinez-Riera R, Martinez-Sanvisens D, Bulbena A. Psychiatric Co- Morbidity and Substance Use Disorders: Treatment in Parallel Systems or in One Integrated System? Subst Use Misuse. 2012;47(8-9):1005-1014. doi:10.3109/10826084.2012.663296 [PubMed: 22676568] 158. source
- Could not verifycites [133] 133. Rohner H, Gaspar N, Philipsen A, Schulze M. Prevalence of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) among Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Populations: Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1275. doi:10.3390/ijerph20021275 [PubMed: 36674031] 159. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods (§2.3–2.4; page unavailable) specify that this meta-analysis examines ADHD prevalence in substance-use populations, including cocaine users. The Results (§3.2; page unavailable) report ADHD prevalence among cocaine users, not modafinil treatment outcomes. Searches for modafinil, sustained cocaine abstinence, and end-of-treatment abstinence found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Modafinil also activates glutamatergic circuits while inhibiting GABA.130,131”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Cocaine Use Disorder
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [130] 130. Richards JR, Garber D, Laurin EG, et al. Treatment of cocaine cardiovascular toxicity: a systematic review. Clin Toxicol Phila Pa. 2016;54(5):345-364. doi:10/gfv25h 154. source
- Could not verifycites [131] 131. Kishi T, Matsuda Y, Iwata N, Correll CU. Antipsychotics for cocaine or psychostimulant dependence: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(12):e1169-1180. doi:10/gn76x9 [PubMed: 24434105] 155. Chan B, Freeman M, Ayers C, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of medications for stimulant use disorders in patients with co-occurring opioid use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;216:108193. doi:10/gn764j [PubMed: 32861136] 156. Kelly TM, Daley DC. Integrated treatment of substance use and psychiatric disorders. Soc Work sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section on neurological and psychological interactions discusses dopamine, serotonin, and endocannabinoids, but does not address modafinil’s effects on glutamatergic circuits or GABA. Searches for modafinil and for glutamate/GABA returned no passage supporting the claim; our copy does not settle it. (LLM, conf=0.72)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“These studies generally noted a large beneficial effect of pharmacotherapy for both preexisting and stimulant-induced psychosis, as well as preexisting and stimulant-induced mania.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Co-occurring Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [114] 114. Murillo-Rodríguez E, Barciela Veras A, Barbosa Rocha N, Budde H, Machado S. An Overview of the Clinical Uses, Pharmacology, and Safety of Modafinil. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2018;9(2):151- 158. doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00374 [PubMed: 29115823] 130. source
- Could not verifycites [117] 117. Sangroula D, Motiwala F, Wagle B, Shah VC, Hagi K, Lippmann S. Modafinil treatment of cocaine dependence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Subst Use Misuse. 2017;52(10):1292-1306. doi:10/gn764f [PubMed: 28350194] 134. Cressman AM, Macdonald EM, Huang A, et al. Prescription Stimulant Use and Hospitalization for Psychosis or Mania: A Population-Based Study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015;35(6):667- 671. doi:10.1097/JCP.0000000000000406 [PubMed: 26485338] 135. Adderall XR [Package Insert]. Shire US Inc; 2001. 136. Tardelli VS, Bisaga A, Arcadepani FB, Gerra G, Levin FR, Fidalgo TM. Presc sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) examine the risk of hospitalization after starting prescription stimulants, not the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for psychosis or mania. The Discussion says stimulant-induced episodes can resolve after discontinuing the stimulant, but reports no large beneficial effect of medication for either preexisting or stimulant-induced conditions. Searches for pharmacotherapy benefits and antipsychotic treatment effectiveness found no such finding in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Could not verifycites [119] 119. Burnette EM, Nieto SJ, Grodin EN, et al. Novel Agents for the Pharmacological Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder. Drugs. 2022;82(3):251-274. doi:10.1007/s40265-021-01670-3 [PubMed: 35133639] 140. Nazarova VA, Sokolov AV, Chubarev VN, Tarasov VV, Schiöth HB. Treatment of ADHD: Drugs, psychological therapies, devices, complementary and alternative methods as well as the trends in clinical trials. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1066988. doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.1066988 [PubMed: 36467081] 141. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Repurposed Agents section discusses aripiprazole as a treatment for alcohol use disorder and reports mixed effects on drinking outcomes. Searches for preexisting or stimulant-induced psychosis and mania found no passage assessing pharmacotherapy for those conditions or describing a large beneficial effect. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“the standard of care for adolescent-and young adult SUD treatment is to use interventions that are specifically tailored or designed for their unique developmental stage.177,178,179”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 31.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [177] 177. Walker R, Northrup TF, Tillitski J, Bernstein I, Greer TL, Trivedi MH. The Stimulant Selective Severity Assessment: A replication and exploratory extension of the Cocaine Selective Severity Assessment. Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(3):351-361. doi:10.1080/10826084.2018.1467453 [PubMed: 30657406] 242. Persson HE, Sjöberg GK, Haines JA, de Garbino JP. Poisoning Severity Score. Grading of Acute Poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1998;36(3):205-213. doi:10.3109/15563659809028940 [PubMed: 9656975] 243. Klega AE, Keehbauch JT. Stimulant and designer drug use: Primary care management. Am Fam Physici sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction describes an evaluation of a stimulant-withdrawal assessment, while Methods > Procedures describes a trial of exercise versus health education as additions to usual care. Searches for adolescent and young adult treatment and developmentally appropriate interventions found no passage stating that developmentally tailored interventions are the standard of care. (LLM, conf=0.72)
- Could not verifycites [178] 178. Nelson LS, Howland MA, Lewin NA, Smith SW, Goldfrank LS, Hoffman RS. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. 11th ed. McGraw Hill; 2019. 247. Glasner-Edwards S, Mooney LJ. Methamphetamine Psychosis: Epidemiology and Management. CNS Drugs. 2014;28(12):1115-1126. doi:10.1007/s40263-014-0209-8 [PubMed: 25373627] 248. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 5.1 discusses extra caution when prescribing antipsychotics to children and adolescents with methamphetamine-induced psychosis; it does not describe developmentally tailored SUD interventions. Sections 5.2–5.3 discuss psychosocial treatments for methamphetamine use without identifying such tailoring as the standard of care for adolescents and young adults. Searches for developmental-stage and age-appropriate treatment found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Could not verifycites [179] 179. Grigg J, Manning V, Arunogiri S, et al. Methamphetamine Treatment Guidelines: Practice Guidelines for Health Professionals. 2nd ed. Turning Point; 2018. 249. Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, et al. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: Initial Validity and Internal Consistency Findings From Three Multisite Studies With Adolescents and Adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(12):1266-1277. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704 [PubMed: 22193671] 250. Tang S, Jones CM, Wisdom A, Lin HC, Bacon S, Houry D. Adverse childhood experiences and stimulant use disorders among adults in the United States. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods section describes studies of suicide assessment, adolescent suicide attempters, and adolescent depression; it does not address standards of care for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. Searches for developmentally tailored adolescent and young-adult SUD interventions found no passage supporting the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“the median age of initiation of cocaine and methamphetamine use is approximately 20 years.164,165”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Population-Specific Considerations
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [164] 164. Slopen N, Shonkoff JP, Albert MA, et al. Racial Disparities in Child Adversity in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(1):47-56. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2015.06.013 [PubMed: 26342634] 219. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Treatment Improvement Protocols (TIP) 57: Trauma-Informed Care in Behavioral Health Services. SMA 13-4801. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA); 2014. Accessed July 29, 2022. https://store.samhsa.gov/product/TIP-57-Trauma-Informed-Care-in-Behavioral-Health- Services/SMA14-4816 220. source
- Could not verifycites [165] 165. Pantalone DW, Nelson KM, Batchelder AW, Chiu C, Gunn HA, Horvath KJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of combination behavioral interventions co-targeting psychosocial syndemics and HIV-related health behaviors for sexual minority men. J Sex Res. 2020;57(6):681-708. doi:10.1080/00224499.2020.1728514 [PubMed: 32077326] 221. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results passages discuss changes in methamphetamine use during interventions, not the age at which use began. Searches for the claimed median age and for age of first cocaine or methamphetamine use found no passage in our copy reporting an initiation age of approximately 20 years in the US. (LLM, conf=0.74)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Some low-quality evidence suggests that patients may be at increased risk of return to use during the postpartum period; small studies in cocaine use disorder showed 27% and 41% of participants returned to use after 3 months and 2 years, respectively.202”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 36.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [202] 202. Palmer RS, McMahon TJ, Moreggi DI, Rounsaville BJ, Ball SA. College Student Drug Use: Patterns, Concerns, Consequences, and Interest in Intervention. J Coll Stud Dev. 2012;53(1):124- 132. doi:10.1353/csd.2012.0014 295. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“All states have laws that describe what minors may and may not consent to without parental/guardian approval, but there is tremendous variability between states.192,193”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Consent for Treatment:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [192] 192. Parker RB, Perry GY, Horan LG, Flowers NC. Comparative Effects of Sodium Bicarbonate and Sodium Chloride on Reversing Cocaine-Induced Changes in the Electrocardiogram: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999;34(6):864-869. doi:10.1097/00005344-199912000-00014 [PubMed: 10598131] 275. Wilson LD, Shelat C. Electrophysiologic and Hemodynamic Effects of Sodium Bicarbonate in a Canine Model of Severe Cocaine Intoxication. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2003;41(6):777-788. doi:10.1081/CLT-120025342 [PubMed: 14677787] 276. Wood DM, Dargan PI, Hoffman RS. Management of cocaine-induced cardiac arrhythmias due to car source
- Could not verifycites [193] 193. Vaidya PH, Petare AU. Drugs implicated in seizures and its management. J Pharmacol Clin Res. 2017;3(2). doi:10.19080/JPCR.2017.03.555607 278. Derlet RW, Albertson TE. Anticonvulsant modification of cocaine-induced toxicity in the rat. Neuropharmacology. 1990;29(3):255-259. doi:10.1016/0028-3908(90)90010-O [PubMed: 2325832] 279. Chen HY, Albertson TE, Olson KR. Treatment of drug-induced seizures. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;81(3):412-419. doi:10/f8b7r5 [PubMed: 26174744] 280. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Conclusion discuss drug-induced seizures and their management, not minors’ legal authority to consent. Searches for minor consent, parental approval, and variation in state laws found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Some states prohibit disclosure to parents/ guardians, some leave this to the clinician's discretion, and others require disclosure under certain circumstances.192,193”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Consent for Treatment:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [192] 192. Parker RB, Perry GY, Horan LG, Flowers NC. Comparative Effects of Sodium Bicarbonate and Sodium Chloride on Reversing Cocaine-Induced Changes in the Electrocardiogram: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999;34(6):864-869. doi:10.1097/00005344-199912000-00014 [PubMed: 10598131] 275. Wilson LD, Shelat C. Electrophysiologic and Hemodynamic Effects of Sodium Bicarbonate in a Canine Model of Severe Cocaine Intoxication. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2003;41(6):777-788. doi:10.1081/CLT-120025342 [PubMed: 14677787] 276. Wood DM, Dargan PI, Hoffman RS. Management of cocaine-induced cardiac arrhythmias due to car source
- Could not verifycites [193] 193. Vaidya PH, Petare AU. Drugs implicated in seizures and its management. J Pharmacol Clin Res. 2017;3(2). doi:10.19080/JPCR.2017.03.555607 278. Derlet RW, Albertson TE. Anticonvulsant modification of cocaine-induced toxicity in the rat. Neuropharmacology. 1990;29(3):255-259. doi:10.1016/0028-3908(90)90010-O [PubMed: 2325832] 279. Chen HY, Albertson TE, Olson KR. Treatment of drug-induced seizures. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;81(3):412-419. doi:10/f8b7r5 [PubMed: 26174744] 280. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Conclusion discuss drug-induced seizures and their management, not state rules on disclosure to parents or guardians. Searches for parental disclosure, clinician discretion, confidentiality, and state law found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“The risk of developing postpartum depression in this population is nearly 20% and corresponds with higher rates of return to use.[203][204][205]”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 36.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [203] 203. Smith DK, Pan Y, Rose CE, et al. A Brief Screening Tool to Assess the Risk of Contracting HIV Infection Among Active Injection Drug Users. J Addict Med. 2015;9(3):226-232. doi:10.1097/ ADM.0000000000000123 [PubMed: 25961495] 296. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Background discusses HIV risk among injection drug users and mentions depression only as a condition for which screening tools exist. Searches for postpartum depression, a nearly 20% risk, and return to use found no passage addressing the claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [204] 204. Maxwell S, Shahmanesh M, Gafos M. Chemsex behaviours among men who have sex with men: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Drug Policy. 2019;63:74-89. doi:10.1016/ j.drugpo.2018.11.014 [PubMed: 30513473] 297. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [205] 205. US Preventive Services Task Force, Krist AH, Davidson KW, et al. Behavioral counseling interventions to prevent sexually transmitted infections: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2020;324(7):674. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.13095 [PubMed: 32809008] 298. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. US Public Health Service: Preexposure Prophylaxis for the Prevention of HIV Infection in the United States-2021 Uudate: A Clinical Practice Guideline. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); 2021. https:// www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk/prep/cdc-hiv-prep-guidelines-2 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Laws that penalize pregnant patients for substance use serve to prevent them from obtaining prenatal care and SUD treatment, which may worsen outcomes for both parent and child.198”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 32.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [198] 198. Sateia MJ, Buysse DJ, Krystal AD, Neubauer DN, Heald JL. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Pharmacologic Treatment of Chronic Insomnia in Adults: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13(02):307-349. doi:10.5664/ jcsm.6470 [PubMed: 27998379] 288. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Suicide Assessment Five-step Evaluation and Triage (SAFE-T) SMA09-4432. Published online 2009. https://store.samhsa.gov/ sites/default/files/sma09-4432.pdf 289. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Aims and PICO Questions sections address medications for chronic insomnia in adults, not laws penalizing substance use during pregnancy. Searches for pregnancy-related penalties, prenatal care, and substance use disorder treatment found no passage addressing the attributed claim. The available passages do not give page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.78)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“current recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) that urine drug testing only be used in conjunction with a careful, confidential history and physical examination 188”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Family Involvement:
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [188] 188. Shin D, Lee ES, Bohra C, Kongpakpaisarn K. In-hospital and long-term outcomes of beta-blocker treatment in cocaine users: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiol Res. 2019;10(1):40- 47. doi:10.14740/cr831 [PubMed: 30834058] 270. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (Characteristics of studies and patients; page unavailable) says the included studies used urine toxicology to assess recent cocaine use. Our copy does not address an American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation about pairing urine drug testing with a confidential history and physical examination; searches for that recommendation found no matching passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“some state laws address alcohol and substance use, while some specify only one or the other.192,193”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Consent for Treatment:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [192] 192. Parker RB, Perry GY, Horan LG, Flowers NC. Comparative Effects of Sodium Bicarbonate and Sodium Chloride on Reversing Cocaine-Induced Changes in the Electrocardiogram: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999;34(6):864-869. doi:10.1097/00005344-199912000-00014 [PubMed: 10598131] 275. Wilson LD, Shelat C. Electrophysiologic and Hemodynamic Effects of Sodium Bicarbonate in a Canine Model of Severe Cocaine Intoxication. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2003;41(6):777-788. doi:10.1081/CLT-120025342 [PubMed: 14677787] 276. Wood DM, Dargan PI, Hoffman RS. Management of cocaine-induced cardiac arrhythmias due to car source
- Could not verifycites [193] 193. Vaidya PH, Petare AU. Drugs implicated in seizures and its management. J Pharmacol Clin Res. 2017;3(2). doi:10.19080/JPCR.2017.03.555607 278. Derlet RW, Albertson TE. Anticonvulsant modification of cocaine-induced toxicity in the rat. Neuropharmacology. 1990;29(3):255-259. doi:10.1016/0028-3908(90)90010-O [PubMed: 2325832] 279. Chen HY, Albertson TE, Olson KR. Treatment of drug-induced seizures. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;81(3):412-419. doi:10/f8b7r5 [PubMed: 26174744] 280. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Drug withdrawal inducing seizures section discusses alcohol withdrawal, and the Drugs Frequently Implicated in Drug Induced Seizures section lists substances associated with seizures. Neither addresses state laws or whether laws distinguish alcohol from other substance use. Searches for state laws and related legal terms found no relevant passage in our copy; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Further, both cisand transgender women are significantly more likely to participate in sex work, which increases risk for victimization.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 41.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [211] 211. Dow-Fleisner SJ, Lomness A, Woolgar L. Impact of safe consumption facilities on individual and community outcomes: A scoping review of the past decade of research. Emerg Trends Drugs Addict Health. 2022;2:100046. doi:10.1016/j.etdah.2022.100046 312. Office of Public Affairs. Appellate Court Agrees with Government that Supervised Injection Sites are Illegal under Fedaral Law; Reverses District Court Ruling. Published January 13, 2021. Accessed August 8, 2023. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/appellate-court-agrees-government- supervised-injection-sites-are-illegal-under-federal-law 313. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.2.5 discusses safer sex practices and experiences of violence among safe-consumption-facility attenders, but not participation in sex work. Searches for sex work, cisgender and transgender women, and victimization found no passage supporting the claimed comparison or causal link. (LLM, conf=0.73)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [212] 212. Aspinall EJ, Nambiar D, Goldberg DJ, et al. Are needle and syringe programmes associated with a reduction in HIV transmission among people who inject drugs: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(1):235-248. doi:10.1093/ije/dyt243 [PubMed: 24374889] 314. Bernard CL, Owens DK, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Brandeau ML. Estimation of the cost- effectiveness of HIV prevention portfolios for people who inject drugs in the United States: A model-based analysis. Tsai AC, ed. PLOS Med. 2017;14(5):e1002312. doi:10.1371/ journal.pmed.1002312 315. source
- Could not verifycites [213] 213. Neaigus A, Zhao M, Gyarmathy VA, Cisek L, Friedman SR, Baxter RC. Greater Drug Injecting Risk for HIV, HBV, and HCV Infection in a City Where Syringe Exchange and Pharmacy Syringe Distribution are Illegal. J Urban Health. 2008;85(3):309-322. doi:10.1007/ s11524-008-9271-1 [PubMed: 18340537] 316. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Table 1 report injecting risks and participants’ demographic characteristics, but do not compare cisgender and transgender women’s participation in sex work or discuss victimization from sex work. Searches of the full-text copy for “transgender,” “sex work,” and “victimization” found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Evidence is mixed regarding the effect of CM on prenatal care participation; studies have found either increased rates of attendance or no significant effect, with two low-quality studies showing a slight increase in attendance.201”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 36.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [201] 201. Rhodes E, Wilson M, Robinson A, Hayden JA, Asbridge M. The effectiveness of prescription drug monitoring programs at reducing opioid-related harms and consequences: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):784. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4642-8 [PubMed: 31675963] 294. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section on opioid-related care outcomes (page unavailable) examines prescription drug monitoring programs, including treatment admissions, not contingency management or prenatal care attendance. Searches for contingency management, prenatal care participation, and the claimed two low-quality studies found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Racism and other forms of discrimination are traumatizing.215”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 41.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [215] 215. Surratt HL, Otachi JK, Williams T, Gulley J, Lockard AS, Rains R. Motivation to Change and Treatment Participation Among Syringe Service Program Utilizers in Rural Kentucky. J Rural Health. 2020;36(2):224-233. doi:10.1111/jrh.12388 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods > Independent Variables passage lists race/ethnicity as a demographic variable and trauma as part of a mental-health screener, but does not link them. Searches for racism, discrimination, and traumatic experiences found no passage in our copy saying that discrimination is traumatizing. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Limited data indicate that alpha-2 adrenergic agonists (eg, dexmedetomidine for more severe symptoms, clonidine for mild to moderate symptoms) are beneficial in treating stimulantinduced agitation and can also be useful in the treatment of hypertension and tachycardia and, thus, should be considered in the management of the hyperadrenergic state of stimulant intoxication.152,153”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Hyperadrenergic Symptoms of Stimulant Intoxication:
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [152] 152. Washio Y, Atreyapurapu S, Hayashi Y, et al. Systematic review on use of health incentives in U.S. to change maternal health behavior. Prev Med. 2021;145:106442. doi:10.1016/ j.ypmed.2021.106442 [PubMed: 33515587] 202. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section on pregnant and postpartum women with substance use disorders discusses vouchers for abstinence and treatment attendance, not medications for stimulant intoxication. Searches for alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, hypertension, tachycardia, and stimulant-induced agitation found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [153] 153. Forray A, Merry B, Lin H, Ruger JP, Yonkers KA. Perinatal substance use: A prospective evaluation of abstinence and relapse. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;150:147-155. doi:10.1016/ j.drugalcdep.2015.02.027 [PubMed: 25772437] 203. Gopman S. Prenatal and Postpartum Care of Women with Substance Use Disorders. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014;41(2):213-228. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2014.02.004 [PubMed: 24845486] 204. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Evidence suggests that treatment should be initiated as soon as feasible for individuals in the criminal and/or legal systems, including within jails and prisons.187,227”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 42.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [187] 187. Lange RA, Cigarroa RG, Yancy CW, et al. Cocaine-Induced Coronary-Artery Vasoconstriction. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(23):1557-1562. doi:10.1056/NEJM198912073212301 [PubMed: 2573838] 269. source
- Could not verifycites [227] 227. Karila L, Leroy C, Dubol M, et al. Dopamine Transporter Correlates and Occupancy by Modafinil in Cocaine-Dependent Patients: A Controlled Study With High-Resolution PET and [11C]- PE2I. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41(9):2294-2302. doi:10.1038/npp.2016.28 [PubMed: 26892922] 343. Morgan PT, Pace-Schott E, Pittman B, Stickgold R, Malison RT. Normalizing Effects of Modafinil on Sleep in Chronic Cocaine Users. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(3):331-340. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09050613 [PubMed: 20080983] 344. Morgan PT, Angarita GA, Canavan S, et al. Modafinil and sleep architecture in an inpati sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Study Design describes modafinil treatment during hospitalization for cocaine-dependent patients, not treatment in jails or prisons. Searches for criminal or legal systems, incarceration, and early treatment initiation found no passage addressing the claimed recommendation. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Recent research suggested that olanzapine or quetiapine may be preferred for the management of methamphetamine-induced psychosis; however, the evidence is considered low quality due to the studies' high risk of bias.150”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Pharmacological Management of Psychosis:
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [150] 150. Byrn MA, Buys EA, Mujahid M, Madsen K. Disparities in the provision of perinatal care based on patient race in the United States. Birth. 2023;50(3):627-635. doi:10.1111/birt.12717 [PubMed: 36945902] 200. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion passages concern racial disparities in perinatal screening and care, not treatment of methamphetamine-induced psychosis. Searches for olanzapine, quetiapine, antipsychotic treatment, and low-quality evidence due to study bias found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Clinicians should recognize that people with physical and cognitive disabilities have higher rates of StUD and lower rates of treatment engagement than those without these disabilities. 222,223”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 42.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [222] 222. Stubbe DE. Practicing Cultural Competence and Cultural Humility in the Care of Diverse Patients. Am Psychiatr Publ. 2020;18(1):49-51. doi:10.1176/appi.focus.20190041 329. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder: For Healthcare and Addiction Professionals, Policymakers, Patients, and Families. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) No. 63. Published online 2021. Accessed March 3, 2023. https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/pep21-02-01-002.pdf 330. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. SAMHSA's Working Definiti sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The discussion of culture-related communication problems mentions physical ability but gives no rates of stimulant use disorder or treatment engagement for people with disabilities. Searches for those outcomes and for physical and cognitive disabilities found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [223] 223. US Department of Health and Human Services. Facing Addiction in America: The Surgeon General's Report on Alcohol, Drugs, and Health. Published online 2016. Accessed August 23, 2023. https://addiction.surgeongeneral.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-generals-report.pdf 332. US Department of Health and Human Services. Social Determinants of Health. Accessed August 23, 2023. https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health 333. HealthIT.gov. Frequently Asked Questions. Accessed August 23, 2023. https:// www.healthit.gov/faq/what-telehealth 334. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Among patients with lifetime ATS use disorder, 29.3% reported four or more ACEs, 28.7% reported two to three ACEs, 21.6% reported one ACE, and 20.4% reported no ACEs.250”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Safety Assessment:
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [250] 250. Mooney ME, Herin DV, Schmitz JM, Moukaddam N, Green CE, Grabowski J. Effects of oral methamphetamine on cocaine use: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;101(1-2):34-41. doi:10/bs7nzc [PubMed: 19058926] 382. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods (section 2.1; page unavailable) describe participants selected for current cocaine dependence, and the Measures (section 2.4; page unavailable) do not include adverse childhood experiences. Searches for the four percentages and for childhood experiences among people with lifetime ATS use disorder found no passage reporting the claimed distribution. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Individuals with SUD are at a significantly greater risk of overdose upon reentry; therefore, continuity of care is critical during this vulnerable period.229”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 42.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [229] 229. Mariani JJ, Pavlicova M, Bisaga A, Nunes EV, Brooks DJ, Levin FR. Extended-Release Mixed Amphetamine Salts and Topiramate for Cocaine Dependence: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;72(11):950-956. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.05.032 [PubMed: 22795453] 349. Levin FR, Mariani JJ, Specker S, et al. Extended-Release Mixed Amphetamine Salts vs Placebo for Comorbid Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Cocaine Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(6):593. doi:10.1001/ jamapsychiatry.2015.41 [PubMed: 25887096] 350. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods and Materials > Treatment passage describes adherence support during a cocaine-dependence trial, and the Discussion addresses treatment outcomes. Searches for overdose upon reentry and continuity of care after reentry found no passage addressing either point; no page numbers were available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“All evidence came from case reports and case series; cocaine-associated hypertensive emergencies were successfully treated with dexmedetomidine, and ATS-associated hypertensive emergencies were successfully treated with propranolol, sodium nitroprusside, nifedipine, labetalol, and phentolamine.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Hyperadrenergic Symptoms of Stimulant Intoxication:
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [152] 152. Washio Y, Atreyapurapu S, Hayashi Y, et al. Systematic review on use of health incentives in U.S. to change maternal health behavior. Prev Med. 2021;145:106442. doi:10.1016/ j.ypmed.2021.106442 [PubMed: 33515587] 202. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [153] 153. Forray A, Merry B, Lin H, Ruger JP, Yonkers KA. Perinatal substance use: A prospective evaluation of abstinence and relapse. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;150:147-155. doi:10.1016/ j.drugalcdep.2015.02.027 [PubMed: 25772437] 203. Gopman S. Prenatal and Postpartum Care of Women with Substance Use Disorders. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014;41(2):213-228. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2014.02.004 [PubMed: 24845486] 204. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“earlier identification of STIs is beneficial and reduces transmission.174”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > • Table 62. Prevention Supervised Consumption
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [174] 174. Al-Tayyib A, Koester S, Langegger S, Raville L. Heroin and methamphetamine injection: An emerging dDrug use pattern. Subst Use Misuse. 2017;52(8):1051-1058. doi:10.1080/10826084.2016.1271432 [PubMed: 28323507] 235. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Behavioral Health Services for People Who Are Homeless. Advisory. Published online 2021. https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/ default/files/pep20-06-04-003.pdf 236. US Department of Housing and Urban Developoment. House America. Accessed August 23, 2023. https://www.hud.gov/house_america 237. Substance Abuse and Mental Healt sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods describe HIV and HCV testing among people who inject drugs, and the Results report infection prevalence. Neither section addresses whether earlier identification of STIs is beneficial or reduces transmission; searches for early identification and STI screening found no passage making that point. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Contingency management (CM) has demonstrated the best effectiveness in the treatment of StUDs compared to any other intervention studied and represents the current standard of care.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 1.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In this particular study, CM was effective for increasing treatment engagement, while the effects were less strong for the specific outcome of abstinence.61”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [61] 61. Meyers RJ, Roozen HG, Smith JE. The community reinforcement approach: an update of the evidence. Alcohol Res Health J Natl Inst Alcohol Abuse Alcohol. 2011;33(4):380-388.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for rhabdomyolysis or renal disease among patients who use stimulants.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 1.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The CGC reviewed available evidence related to several medications that are not included in the recommendations in this section due to negative or insufficient evidence.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Pharmacotherapy
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Over 6% of new onset seizures are substance-related; in adults, 9% of status epilepticus is substance-induced.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 70.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [277]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A few pharmacotherapies have been investigated for the treatment of stimulant withdrawal; however, most of the studies are small and of low quality.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > a.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, the CGC was not able to come to consensus on any validated screening instruments specific to stimulant use.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Screening
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Seizures can occur in association with methamphetamine use, with epileptic seizures being a frequent complication of methamphetamine intoxication.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 70.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [270]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [280]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The gray literature search identified multiple clinical guidelines that address pharmacological options for management of agitation and psychosis, including guidance from SAHMSA, AAFP, UNODC, and other international guidelines (see Appendix G). 187,243,244”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Nonpharmacological Management Strategies for Behavioral and Psychiatric Symptoms:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [187] 187. Lange RA, Cigarroa RG, Yancy CW, et al. Cocaine-Induced Coronary-Artery Vasoconstriction. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(23):1557-1562. doi:10.1056/NEJM198912073212301 [PubMed: 2573838] 269. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [243] 243. Miles SW, Sheridan J, Russell B, et al. Extended-release methylphenidate for treatment of amphetamine/methamphetamine dependence: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial: Methylphenidate in amphetamine dependence. Addiction. 2013;108(7):1279-1286. doi:10.1111/add.12109 [PubMed: 23297867] 372. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [244] 244. Minařík J, Gabrhelík R, Malcolm R, Pavlovská A, Miller P. Methylphenidate substitution for methamphetamine addiction and implications for future randomized clinical trials: a unique case series. J Subst Use. 2016;21(4):435-438. doi:10.3109/14659891.2015.1045047 373. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, given stimulants' proconvulsive activity, there is debate over whether all components of this evaluationwhich involves neurology consultation and evaluation, including electroencephalogram (EEG) follow-up testing-are necessary when the seizure is likely to be stimulant-induced.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 70.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings varied by population studied (eg, festivals, people who inject drugs), and studies focused on opioid use, though people who use stimulants were not explicitly excluded.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 84.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The CGC emphasized that there is currently debate within the field as to the utility of universal screening for ADHD”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Assessment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While SCS are associated with a small reduction in infections, they are associated with a moderate reduction in risky injection behaviors and a moderate to large increase in SUD treatment initiation.311”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 84.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [311]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“While rare in the US, supervised consumption sites (SCS) are effective at reducing the incidence of drug use-related morbidity and mortality.311”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 84.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [311]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“SSPs are associated with safer injection technique; fewer wounds; and reductions in HIV, HCV, other blood-borne infections, and complicated infections.313- 317”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 88.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [313]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [314]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [315]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [316]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [317]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A nationally representative 2007 survey of Australian adults estimated that 50.4% of individuals who use stimulants nonmedically would develop a StUD within 14 years of onset of use.284”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 92.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [284]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Strong evidence exists that PrEP is effective at preventing HIV overall, as well as consistently across subgroups with the highest risk for HIV.321,322”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 88.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [321]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [322]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, the patient panel was not engaged to the degree initially hoped; only one patient panel member attended the scheduled meetings.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Qualifying Statement
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The draft Guideline was sent out for public comment in May 2023.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Developing Evidence to Decision
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While the rate of cocaine use has been relatively flat, rates of cocaine use disorder, methamphetamine use, and methamphetamine use disorder are rising.[4][5][6][7]”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Background
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [4][5][6][7]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Judgments were reviewed and discussed in subcommittee meetings and revised as appropriate based on the consensus of the subcommittee and/or CGC.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Developing Evidence to Decision
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“In addition, there has been a large increase in the risk from use due to the increasing potency of illicit stimulants and the increasing use of stimulants in combination with opioids, which can increase toxicity.8”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Background
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [8] 8. Drug Enforcement Administration. 2020 National Drug Threat Assessment. DEA-DCT- DIR-008-21; 2021. Accessed January 17, 2023. https://www.dea.gov/sites/default/files/2021-02/ DIR-008-21%202020%20National%20Drug%20Threat%20Assessment_WEB.pdf
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When the draft Guideline was sent out for public comment, it was sent to these and other patient advocacy organizations, but no feedback was received.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Qualifying Statement
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Titles, abstracts, and full texts were reviewed by two independent senior members of the research team for inclusion in the literature review.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > GRADE Methodology-The
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A systematic literature review was conducted to support the GRADE evidence profiles used as part of the Guideline's development process.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > GRADE Methodology-The
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A survey distributed to the patient panel and the clinical experience of the CGC informed judgments about patient preferences for different intervention outcomes.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 4.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“None of the disclosures from the CGC were deemed to present significant conflicts of interest in relation to the recommendation statements.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Qualifying Statement
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The most recent National Drug Threat Assessment from the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) reported stable or rising availability and potency and low prices for cocaine and methamphetamine that are expected to exacerbate these trends.8”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Background
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [8] 8. Drug Enforcement Administration. 2020 National Drug Threat Assessment. DEA-DCT- DIR-008-21; 2021. Accessed January 17, 2023. https://www.dea.gov/sites/default/files/2021-02/ DIR-008-21%202020%20National%20Drug%20Threat%20Assessment_WEB.pdf
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The certainty of the body of evidence (ie, compiled across evidence types) for each intervention and outcome pair was rated by one member of the research team as high, moderate, low, or very low based on the following indicators:”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 4.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The feasibility of interventions was determined primarily by the clinical experience of the CGC, as acceptability and feasibility were not targets of the literature review.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 4.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Disclosures of interest for members of ASAM's QIC and Board of Directors and AAAP's Executive Committee were reviewed and no significant conflicts of interest were identified.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Qualifying Statement
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At least 75% agreement among eligible voters was required to approve a recommendation.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Developing Evidence to Decision
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Titles, abstracts, and full texts were reviewed by one senior member of the research team.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > GRADE Methodology-The
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Substantial barriers have limited implementation of CRA; it requires a great deal of resources and patient commitment relative to other behavioral interventions.66”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [66] 66. Kadden RM, Carroll K, Donovan DM, et al. Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills Therapy Manual: A Clinical Research Guide for Therapists Treating Individuals with Alcohol Abuse and Dependence. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 2003. https:// pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/projectmatch/match03.pdf
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Barriers to implementing CM include regulatory obstacles, financial costs, stakeholder buy-in, and program resources.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Behavioral Treatment
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [48][49][50][51]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Addressing these priorities would reduce regulatory and financial barriers and facilitate adoption of CM.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Using an incentive value that is too low does not represent evidence-based practices and is unlikely to be effective; such implementations may lead decision-makers to erroneously conclude that CM is not effective.51”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [51] 51. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General. Medicare and state health care programs: Fraud and abuse; Revisions to safe harbors under the anti-kickback statute, and civil monetary penalty rules regarding beneficiary inducements; Final rule. Fed Regist. 2020;85(232):77684-77895.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“CRA by definition needs to be tailored to contextual factors in the patient's environment, so any differences in behavioral or environmental concomitants of the substance being used should be addressed by the intervention.65”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [65] 65. Oxford Learner's Dictionaries. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Accessed April 27, 2023. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/cognitive-behavioural- therapy#:~:text=%5Buncountable%5D,Join%20us
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The CGC concluded that CRA is associated with apparent benefits and no known undesirable effects.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“CRA combined with CM appears to be effective for reduced stimulant use and treatment retention.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“On April 1, 2021, the federal government issued a statement on drug policy priorities, including goals to”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [58] 58. Rash CJ. Implementing an evidence-based prize contingency management protocol for stimulant use. J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023;151:209079. doi:10.1016/j.josat.2023.209079 [PubMed: 37230390] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ASAM and AAAP staff collated the public comments, and the CGC analyzed the feedback and made necessary revisions prior to finalization and publication.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Developing Evidence to Decision
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“CRA is costly and labor intensive; funding and staff levels would have to be increased for adequate implementation.66”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [66] 66. Kadden RM, Carroll K, Donovan DM, et al. Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills Therapy Manual: A Clinical Research Guide for Therapists Treating Individuals with Alcohol Abuse and Dependence. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 2003. https:// pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/projectmatch/match03.pdf
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“While CRA appears to be one of the more promising behavioral interventions for StUD, especially when combined with CM, it has not been widely implemented outside of research settings.66”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [66] 66. Kadden RM, Carroll K, Donovan DM, et al. Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills Therapy Manual: A Clinical Research Guide for Therapists Treating Individuals with Alcohol Abuse and Dependence. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 2003. https:// pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/projectmatch/match03.pdf
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A meta-analysis that analyzed 50 clinical studies on 12 different psychosocial interventions found that CM combined with CRA was the most efficacious treatment for StUD, especially cocaine use disorder.42”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [42] 42. Brown HD, DeFulio A. Contingency management for the treatment of methamphetamine use disorder: A systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;216:108307. doi:10.1016/ j.drugalcdep.2020.108307 [PubMed: 33007699] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effective CM interventions are attentive to the schedule, magnitude, timing, and type of reinforcement; this can be cumbersome in busy treatment settings, but technology may ease the burden”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The CGC noted that while available research suggests CM alone is effective at promoting desired behaviors, patients with greater or more complex therapeutic needs are likely to benefit from additional behavioral interventions.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Behavioral Treatment
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The DSM classifies substance use disorders (including StUD) as mild, moderate, or severe based on how many of 11 criteria are met: mild StUD meets 2 to 3 criteria, moderate StUD meets 4 to 5 criteria, and severe StUD meets 6 or more criteria.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 1.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [18] 18. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision. American Psychiatric Association; 2022.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Few settings have workforces that are appropriately trained to deliver CRA, and few experts are available to train clinicians in its delivery.66”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [66] 66. Kadden RM, Carroll K, Donovan DM, et al. Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills Therapy Manual: A Clinical Research Guide for Therapists Treating Individuals with Alcohol Abuse and Dependence. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 2003. https:// pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/projectmatch/match03.pdf
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Some evidence supports CBT as superior to usual treatment options, such as individual and group counseling, on stimulant use and abstinence outcomes during treatment and at follow-up, as well as for treatment retention.42,64”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [42] 42. Brown HD, DeFulio A. Contingency management for the treatment of methamphetamine use disorder: A systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;216:108307. doi:10.1016/ j.drugalcdep.2020.108307 [PubMed: 33007699] source
- Not matchedcites [64] 64. Sánchez Hervás E, Zacarés Romaguera FD, García Rodríguez O, Secades Villa R, Fernández Hermida JR. Community reinforcement approach (CRA) for cocaine addicts: establishment in a public health setting. An Psiquiatr. 2008;24(4):153-158.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While individual studies had mixed results, a meta-analysis found bupropion to be superior to placebo on sustained (e.g., 3 or more weeks) cocaine abstinence (Castells, 2015).”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Non-Psychostimulant Medications Cocaine Use Disorder
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Castells, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Telemedicine is also an important tool for expanding access to care, particularly in rural and underserved areas where SUD treatment services are limited.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Implementation Considerations:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Topiramate is an anticonvulsant medication that is FDA-approved for the treatment of epilepsy and migraine.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While evidence is strongest for cocaine use, the CGC has no reason to believe the effectiveness would be significantly different for ATS use.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 5.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The CGC acknowledged that the existing evidence for treating StUD with medications is relatively low quality.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Pharmacotherapy
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, the lack of clinician interactions could make it more difficult to identify signs of decompensation, such as suicidal ideation or behavior.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Implementation Considerations:
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Bupropion is a dual dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that is FDA-approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), seasonal affective disorder, and smoking cessation.106”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Non-Psychostimulant Medications Cocaine Use Disorder
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [106] 106. Insert. Bausch Health Comapnies Inc.; 1985. 112. Meldrum BS. Update on the Mechanism of Action of Antiepileptic Drugs. Epilepsia. 1996;37(s6):S4-S11. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb06038.x 113. Silberstein SD. Topiramate in Migraine Prevention: A 2016 Perspective. Headache J Head Face Pain. 2017;57(1):165-178. doi:10.1111/head.12997 114. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While video-based telemedicine has not been studied in this population, the CGC noted that it is reasonable to think that it would perform similarly to audio-only telemedicine.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Implementation Considerations:
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The CGC underscored the superiority of CM as a primary component of treatment for StUD.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Regulatory Barriers:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Though both desirable and undesirable effects are small, the CGC concluded based on the meta-analysis that the potential benefits of bupropion outweigh the potential risks.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Non-Psychostimulant Medications Cocaine Use Disorder
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There may be acceptability issues due to patients being uncomfortable appearing on camera.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Implementation Considerations:
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The recommendations for non-psychostimulant and psychostimulant medications have been categorized by substance type (ie, cocaine use disorder and ATS use disorder) due to their different pharmacological mechanisms of action, which may impact the effectiveness of pharmacotherapies.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Pharmacotherapy
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, with the patient on camera, the clinician may be better able to detect signs of substance use and/or distress.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Implementation Considerations:
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In addition, methamphetamine's half-life of 10 to 12 hours is significantly longer than cocaine's 1-hour half-life, leading to more prolonged effects.105”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Pharmacotherapy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [105] 105. Rujescu D, Röttig S, Krause TJ. Bupropion and Depressions. In: Riederer P, Laux G, Mulsant B, Le W, Nagatsu T, eds. NeuroPsychopharmacotherapy. Springer International Publishing; 2020:1- 10. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56015-1_83-1 111. Wellbutrin source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the limitations of the evidence, the CGC agreed that medications may be helpful for some patients with StUD, particularly in the context of certain co-occurring disorders (see Cooccurring Disorders).”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Pharmacotherapy
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, the CGC noted that text messaging interventions for StUD are promising as add-on interventions; however, there is insufficient evidence to recommend them at this time.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Implementation Considerations:
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Cocaine and ATS both increase dopamine signaling in the brain 105 ; cocaine blocks the reuptake of dopamine, whereas methamphetamine both increases dopamine release and blocks its reuptake, resulting in much higher concentrations.105”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Pharmacotherapy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [105] 105. Rujescu D, Röttig S, Krause TJ. Bupropion and Depressions. In: Riederer P, Laux G, Mulsant B, Le W, Nagatsu T, eds. NeuroPsychopharmacotherapy. Springer International Publishing; 2020:1- 10. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56015-1_83-1 111. Wellbutrin source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Though both desirable and undesirable effects are small, the CGC concluded that the potential benefits of bupropion outweigh the potential risks.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > a.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While clinical trials have evaluated both oral and injectable formulations of naltrexone for ATS use disorder, oral naltrexone has not been studied in combination with bupropion.120,121”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [120] 120. Martin D, Le JK. Amphetamine. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556103/?report=classic 142.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [121] 121. Cook J, Lloyd-Jones M, Arunogiri S, Ogden E, Bonomo Y. Managing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults using illicit psychostimulants: A systematic review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017;51(9):876-885. doi:10.1177/0004867417714878 [PubMed: 28639480] 143. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The CGC noted that there is no reason to believe that oral naltrexone would be less effective in this population if the patient is adherent to treatment, although injectable medications can facilitate adherence.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite these potential barriers, the CGC concluded that in certain patients, this treatment option may be useful in reducing ATS use and other co-occurring symptoms.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Both studies-one open label and one RCT-included patients with moderate to severe methamphetamine use disorder.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [120] 120. Martin D, Le JK. Amphetamine. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556103/?report=classic 142.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [121] 121. Cook J, Lloyd-Jones M, Arunogiri S, Ogden E, Bonomo Y. Managing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults using illicit psychostimulants: A systematic review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017;51(9):876-885. doi:10.1177/0004867417714878 [PubMed: 28639480] 143. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Topiramate has been shown to reduce alcohol use and is utilized off-label for treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD).116”
- Also stated in: § c. · plain
“Topiramate has been shown to reduce alcohol use and is utilized off-label for treatment of AUD.116”
- Also stated in: § 17. · plain
“Because topiramate has been shown to reduce alcohol use and is utilized off-label for treatment of AUD, the CGC agreed that combination topiramate and MAS-ER treatment could be given additional consideration for patients with co-occurring cocaine use disorder and AUD.138,139”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [116] 116. Castells X, Cunill R, Pérez-Mañá C, Vidal X, Capellà D. Psychostimulant drugs for cocaine dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Published online September 27, 2016:9. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007380.pub4 133. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § c. · plain
In the paper
“Another multisite RCT found that while topiramate did not increase abstinence for the overall treatment group, it significantly reduced amount of methamphetamine use and recurrence of use in the subgroup of individuals who were abstinent at the start of treatment.123”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > c.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [123] 123. Torchalla I, Nosen L, Rostam H, Allen P. Integrated treatment programs for individuals with concurrent substance use disorders and trauma experiences: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012;42(1):65-77. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2011.09.001 [PubMed: 22035700] 147. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The evidence for topiramate in cocaine use disorder outcomes is mixed; a meta-analysis demonstrated a higher rate of continuous stimulant abstinence over three weeks with topiramate versus placebo.114”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [114] 114. Murillo-Rodríguez E, Barciela Veras A, Barbosa Rocha N, Budde H, Machado S. An Overview of the Clinical Uses, Pharmacology, and Safety of Modafinil. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2018;9(2):151- 158. doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00374 [PubMed: 29115823] 130. source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The CGC considered it appropriate to extend the evidence to other ATS use disorder populations because the pharmacotherapeutic mechanisms of effect are expected to be similar.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The standard dosing of injectable naltrexone is every four weeks for the treatment of AUD and prevention of OUD recurrence.120,121”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [120] 120. Martin D, Le JK. Amphetamine. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556103/?report=classic 142.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [121] 121. Cook J, Lloyd-Jones M, Arunogiri S, Ogden E, Bonomo Y. Managing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults using illicit psychostimulants: A systematic review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017;51(9):876-885. doi:10.1177/0004867417714878 [PubMed: 28639480] 143. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While bupropion and naltrexone are generally well tolerated, both studies reported a moderate number of adverse events.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [120] 120. Martin D, Le JK. Amphetamine. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556103/?report=classic 142.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [121] 121. Cook J, Lloyd-Jones M, Arunogiri S, Ogden E, Bonomo Y. Managing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults using illicit psychostimulants: A systematic review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017;51(9):876-885. doi:10.1177/0004867417714878 [PubMed: 28639480] 143. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The combination of these medications would most likely be prescribed by an addiction specialist, potentially limiting access and increasing health inequities.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Naltrexone is a mu opioid receptor antagonist that is FDA-approved for the treatment of AUD and OUD; its extended-release formulation is also approved for the prevention of OUD recurrence.122”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [122] 122. Verghese C, Abdijadid S. Methylphenidate. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482451/ 144. Ritalin [Package Insert]. Novartis; 1955. 145. Roberts NP, Roberts PA, Jones N, Bisson JI. Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(4). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010204.pub2 146. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the CGC judged that the evidence only somewhat favors topiramate, they concluded that topiramate might be considered for patients with cocaine use disorder, especially those who are highly motivated to achieve abstinence.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the open label trial, naltrexone was administered every four weeks, whereas in the RCT it was administered every three weeks to reduce potential blood level fluctuations.120,121”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [120] 120. Martin D, Le JK. Amphetamine. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556103/?report=classic 142.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [121] 121. Cook J, Lloyd-Jones M, Arunogiri S, Ogden E, Bonomo Y. Managing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults using illicit psychostimulants: A systematic review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017;51(9):876-885. doi:10.1177/0004867417714878 [PubMed: 28639480] 143. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Modafinil is a wakefulness-promoting medication used in the treatment of narcolepsy, obstructive sleep apnea, and shift work-related sleep disorder.129”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Cocaine Use Disorder
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [129] 129. Richards JR, Albertson TE, Derlet RW, Lange RA, Olson KR, Horowitz BZ. Treatment of toxicity from amphetamines, related derivatives, and analogues: a systematic clinical review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;150:1-13. doi:10/f69r7s [PubMed: 25724076] 153.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Integrated treatment of StUD and co-occurring mental health conditions is expected to be more convenient and cost-effective for patients than parallel or sequential treatment models, with benefits likely to largely outweigh risks or harms.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Co-occurring Disorders
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Prescription amphetamine formulations are FDA-approved for the treatment of ADHD and narcolepsy.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [141] 141. Dalton K, Bishop L, Darcy S. Investigating interventions that lead to the highest treatment retention for emerging adults with substance use disorder: A systematic review. Addict Behav. 2021;122:107005. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107005 [PubMed: 34119856] 181. Hogue A, Henderson CE, Becker SJ, Knight DK. Evidence Base on Outpatient Behavioral Treatments for Adolescent Substance Use, 2014-2017: Outcomes, Treatment Delivery, and Promising Horizons. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Off J Soc Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Am Psychol Assoc Div 53. 2018;47(4):499-526. doi:10.1080/15374416.2018.1466307 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Included studies are not specific to StUD and include approaches that target mixed SUDs and co-occurring depression, anxiety disorders, or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); findings are mixed, but some benefits in reduction of substance use or psychiatric symptoms likely apply to populations with StUD.[145][146][147][148][149]”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Co-occurring Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [145] 145. Sharko M, Jameson R, Ancker JS, Krams L, Webber EC, Rosenbloom ST. State-by-State Variability in Adolescent Privacy Laws. Pediatrics. 2022;149(6):e2021053458. doi:10.1542/ peds.2021-053458 [PubMed: 35531640] 190. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [146] 146. Weddle M, Kokotailo P. Confidentiality and Consent in Adolescent Substance Abuse: An Update. AMA J Ethics. 2005;7(3):239-243. doi:10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.3.pfor1-0503 191. source
- Not matchedcites [147] 147. Slisz K. Protecting minors with substance use disorders: A closer look at the relationship of confidentiality with treatment options. Indiana J Law Soc Equal. 2020;8(2). 192. Weisleder P. Inconsistency among American states on the age at which minors can consent to substance abuse treatment. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2007;35(3):317-322. [PubMed: 17872552] 193.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is likely that many of the benefits observed in adults over 18 years of age would be expected in older adolescents (ie, 16-and 17-year-olds).”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 31.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Current data suggest that family therapy can be more effective than other therapeutic modalities in reducing substance use in adolescents and young adults with SUDs, but this research is not specific for StUD.182”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 31.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [182] 182. McCarron MM, Wood JD. The cocaine "body packer" syndrome. Diagnosis and treatment. JAMA. 1983;250(11):1417-1420. [PubMed: 6887463] 255. Traub SJ, Hoffman RS, Nelson LS. Body packing--the internal concealment of illicit drugs. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(26):2519-2526. doi:10.1056/NEJMra022719 [PubMed: 14695412] 256. Chai PR, Bastan W, Machan J, Hack JB, Babu KM. Levamisole exposure and hematologic indices in cocaine users. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(11):1141-1147. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01202.x 257. Pope JD, Drummer OH, Schneider HG. False-Positive Amphetamines in U source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“3.7% reported nonmedical use of prescription stimulants”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Population-Specific Considerations
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [163] 163. Maguire-Jack K, Lanier P, Lombardi B. Investigating racial differences in clusters of adverse childhood experiences. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(1):106-114. doi:10.1037/ort0000405 [PubMed: 30816722] 218. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The CGC's clinical experience suggested that the involvement of family members is often beneficial in the treatment of adolescents and young adults with SUDs, and trusted adults should be incorporated when appropriate.187”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Family Involvement:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [187] 187. Lange RA, Cigarroa RG, Yancy CW, et al. Cocaine-Induced Coronary-Artery Vasoconstriction. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(23):1557-1562. doi:10.1056/NEJM198912073212301 [PubMed: 2573838] 269. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the CGC noted that few such programs exist, depending on the region”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Adolescent and Young Adult Assessment and Treatment Planning:
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Use of extended-release ‡ ‡ or prodrug formulations can mitigate risks related to misuse and the addictive potential of prescription stimulants by producing less rapid onset of effect, maintaining more steady serum levels of medication, and/or preventing or reducing effects when alternative routes of administration are used.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 25.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“given the success in reducing other substance use, the CGC inferred that family therapy could also be effective and appropriate to recommend for adolescents and young adults with StUD who consent to family therapy.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 31.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“drug testing may result in false negatives and positives”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Adolescent and Young Adult Assessment and Treatment Planning:
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although no clinical trials have been conducted that examine StUD treatment outcomes when underlying ADHD or eating disorders are treated”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Adolescent and Young Adult Assessment and Treatment Planning:
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“0.5% reported use of methamphetamine in the past year. 163”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Population-Specific Considerations
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [163] 163. Maguire-Jack K, Lanier P, Lombardi B. Investigating racial differences in clusters of adverse childhood experiences. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(1):106-114. doi:10.1037/ort0000405 [PubMed: 30816722] 218. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adolescent patients may be understandably hesitant to participate in CM as part of StUD treatment because they do not want their parents/ guardians to be informed of positive results.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 31.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the CGC recognized that family involvement can enhance both engagement and efficacy of treatment in adult populations”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Family Involvement:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For some adolescent and young adult patients, engaging in prosocial behaviorssuch as receiving permission to attend events or spend time with friends-may be more incentivizing than cash or voucher rewards.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 31.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adolescent-and young adult-specific models or tailored treatment for StUD are expected to be moderately more effective than nonspecific treatment and less likely to expose patients to peers who use other substances.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 31.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“family therapy may uncover other dynamics -including co-occurring disorders in other family members, challenges in communication between family members, or more serious issues such as physical or sexual abuse-that may reveal additional treatment needs and/or impact adolescent and young adult patients' engagement in continuing family therapy.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 31.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“0.1% reported use of methamphetamine in the past year.163”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Population-Specific Considerations
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [163] 163. Maguire-Jack K, Lanier P, Lombardi B. Investigating racial differences in clusters of adverse childhood experiences. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(1):106-114. doi:10.1037/ort0000405 [PubMed: 30816722] 218. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“3.5% reported use of cocaine”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Population-Specific Considerations
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [163] 163. Maguire-Jack K, Lanier P, Lombardi B. Investigating racial differences in clusters of adverse childhood experiences. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(1):106-114. doi:10.1037/ort0000405 [PubMed: 30816722] 218. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“0.2% reported use of cocaine”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Population-Specific Considerations
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [163] 163. Maguire-Jack K, Lanier P, Lombardi B. Investigating racial differences in clusters of adverse childhood experiences. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(1):106-114. doi:10.1037/ort0000405 [PubMed: 30816722] 218. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“While data are available regarding the efficacy of CM and family therapy for adolescents and young adults with SUD, data evaluating other therapy modalities (eg, CBT, CRA) are lacking.175,176”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 31.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [175] 175. Vorspan F, Bellais L, Romo L, Bloch V, Neira R, Lépine JP. The Obsessive-Compulsive Cocaine Scale (OCCS): A Pilot Study of a New Questionnaire for Assessing Cocaine Craving: Obsessive-Compulsive Cocaine Scale (OCCS). Am J Addict. 2012;21(4):313-319. doi:10.1111/ j.1521-0391.2012.00248.x [PubMed: 22691009] 240. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [176] 176. Kampman KM, Volpicelli JR, Mcginnis DE, et al. Reliability and validity of the cocaine selective severity assessment. Addict Behav. 1998;23(4):449-461. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(98)00011-2 [PubMed: 9698974] 241. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“CM has been consistently associated with longer durations of continuous abstinence and lower rates of stimulant use than noncontingent reinforcement (ie, rewards that are not contingent on the desired behavior) and treatment as usual.42”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 31.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [42] 42. Brown HD, DeFulio A. Contingency management for the treatment of methamphetamine use disorder: A systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;216:108307. doi:10.1016/ j.drugalcdep.2020.108307 [PubMed: 33007699] source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In some cases, adolescents and young adults who misuse stimulants do so to address underlying symptoms of ADHD or, in other cases, to lose weight as part of an eating disorder.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Adolescent and Young Adult Assessment and Treatment Planning:
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Being exposed to older individuals-who tend to have used substances for longer and, therefore, tend to have developed more severe SUDs-can reduce the effectiveness of behavioral interventions for adolescents and young adults and increase their experiences of negative pressure from other participants.184”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 31.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [184] 184. Connors NJ, Alsakha A, Larocque A, Hoffman RS, Landry T, Gosselin S. Antipsychotics for the treatment of sympathomimetic toxicity: A systematic review. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(10):1880-1890. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.001 [PubMed: 30639129] 264. Alexander PD, Gicas KM, Willi TS, et al. A comparison of psychotic symptoms in subjects with methamphetamine versus cocaine dependence. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017;234(9- 10):1535-1547. doi:10.1007/s00213-017-4551-7 [PubMed: 28190084] 265. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“among adolescents (ie, ages 12 to 17), 1.2% reported nonmedical use of prescription stimulants”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Population-Specific Considerations
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [163] 163. Maguire-Jack K, Lanier P, Lombardi B. Investigating racial differences in clusters of adverse childhood experiences. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(1):106-114. doi:10.1037/ort0000405 [PubMed: 30816722] 218. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“CM in combination with other behavioral health interventions has been shown to have a small effect on reducing adolescent and young adult cannabis use and increasing treatment retention compared to behavioral health interventions without CM.180,181”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 31.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [180] 180. Cappelletti S, Piacentino D, Sani G, et al. Systematic review of the toxicological and radiological features of body packing. Int J Legal Med. 2016;130(3):693-709. doi:10.1007/ s00414-015-1310-3 [PubMed: 26932867] 252. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [181] 181. Li RB, Guan DW, Zhu BL, Zhang GH, Zhao R. Death from accidental poisoning of methamphetamine by leaking into alimentary tract in drug traffic: a case report. Leg Med Tokyo Jpn. 2009;11 Suppl 1:S491-493. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.02.028 253. Pramanik P, Vidua RK. Sudden Cardiac Death of a Body Packer Due to Cocaine Cardiotoxicity. Clin Med Insights Pathol. 2016;9:33-35. doi:10.4137/CPath.S41070 [PubMed: 27932899] 254. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“patients may not always take their psychostimulant medication daily and may accumulate a surplus of medications which can be a source of misuse and diversion.170”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Population-Specific Considerations
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [170] 170. O'Connor AW, Sears JM, Fulton-Kehoe D. Overdose and substance-related mortality after release from prison in Washington State: 2014-2019. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022;241:109655. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109655 [PubMed: 36283246] 230. Perez GR, Ustyol A, Mills KJ, Raitt JM, North CS. The Prevalence of Cocaine Use in Homeless Populations: A Systematic Review. Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2022;9(3):246-279. doi:10.1007/s40501-022-00271-5 231. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“clinical judgment supports provision of these services as very likely to be beneficial.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 36.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the postpartum period is typically a time of increased stress, which may lead to increased risk of return to stimulant use and heightened potential for overdose.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 36.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Minors may be considered emancipated if they are married, parents, or in the military.194”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Consent for Treatment:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [194] 194. Braunwarth W, Christ M, Dirks H, Dyba J, Härtel-Petri R, Harfst T. S3 Practice Guideline Methamphetamine-Related Disorders. German Agency for Quality in Medicine (Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin; ÄZQ); 2016. Accessed November 18, 2022. https:// www.aezq.de/mdb/edocs/pdf/literatur/s3-gl-methamphetamine-related-disorders-long.pdf 281.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Parental/guardian consent is not required for treatment of young adults”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Consent for Treatment:
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These determinants often reflect stigmatizing and discriminatory ideologies-such as racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, and ableism-and actualize as inequitable resource distribution that limits access to preventive services and quality treatment, which further drive health disparities.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 41.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“although all states require parental/guardian consent for most medical care provided to minors, there are several exceptions.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Consent for Treatment:
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“In some states, minors can initiate SUD treatment without involvement of a parent or legal guardian; in other states, parental/guardian consent may be required before proceeding with some or all aspects of treatment.186,187”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Consent for Treatment:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [186] 186. Almaddah N, Ajayi TO. Cocaine-Induced Coronary-Artery Vasospasm. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(5):e5. doi:10.1056/NEJMicm1503339 [PubMed: 26840152] 267. Sand IC, Brody SL, Wrenn KD, Slovis CM. Experience with esmolol for the treatment of cocaine-associated cardiovascular complications. Am J Emerg Med. 1991;9(2):161-163. doi:10.1016/0735-6757(91)90182-J [PubMed: 1671639] 268. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [187] 187. Lange RA, Cigarroa RG, Yancy CW, et al. Cocaine-Induced Coronary-Artery Vasoconstriction. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(23):1557-1562. doi:10.1056/NEJM198912073212301 [PubMed: 2573838] 269. source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Need for parenting and family support are expected to be greater in those with StUDs, who often face greater disintegration of usual social supports and family structure.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 36.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Risk level often varies depending upon trimester”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 36.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“generally understood to refer to minors who are living apart from their parents or legal guardians and are financially independent.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Consent for Treatment:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [194] 194. Braunwarth W, Christ M, Dirks H, Dyba J, Härtel-Petri R, Harfst T. S3 Practice Guideline Methamphetamine-Related Disorders. German Agency for Quality in Medicine (Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin; ÄZQ); 2016. Accessed November 18, 2022. https:// www.aezq.de/mdb/edocs/pdf/literatur/s3-gl-methamphetamine-related-disorders-long.pdf 281.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The CGC also noted that not all SGM patients require tailored programming; insistence on requiring it could lead to decreased access to general programming if misapplied and, in the worst case, could be used to discriminate against certain populations.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity:
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Access to both antenatal and postpartum care continues to be problematic and subject to significant health inequities in diagnosing and appropriately managing postpartum depression in minoritized populations.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 36.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The CGC noted that these effects may be due to increased treatment engagement, which can help reduce substance use, though this outcome was not specifically examined in the reviews identified.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity:
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Toxicology testing that is comprehensive, accurate, and interpreted correctly may be useful for educating patients and providers and, occasionally, as a diagnostic tool.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Toxicology Testing:
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The higher prevalence of HIV, hepatitis, and STIs in patients who use stimulants justifies testing.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Body Stuffing or Packing:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Levamisole is a common adulterant in the cocaine supply and can cause immunosuppression-in particular, neutropenia-and small vessel vasculitis.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Body Stuffing or Packing:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [256] 256. Kongsakon R, Papadopoulos KI, Saguansiritham R. Mirtazapine in amphetamine detoxification: a placebo-controlled pilot study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005;20(5):253-256. doi:10.1097/01.yic.0000166815.83017.d8 [PubMed: 16096515] 392. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Toxicology testing may answer specific questions regarding a patient's recent substance use but is limited by the specific test, as some stimulants are not included on typical screening panels.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Toxicology Testing:
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a systematic review focused on cocaine-related cardiovascular toxicity, Richards et al (2016) concluded that calcium channel blockers may decrease hypertension and vasospasm but not necessarily tachycardia, whereas benzodiazepines appear safe for non-cardiovascular related symptoms.153”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Hyperadrenergic Symptoms of Stimulant Intoxication:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [153] 153. Forray A, Merry B, Lin H, Ruger JP, Yonkers KA. Perinatal substance use: A prospective evaluation of abstinence and relapse. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;150:147-155. doi:10.1016/ j.drugalcdep.2015.02.027 [PubMed: 25772437] 203. Gopman S. Prenatal and Postpartum Care of Women with Substance Use Disorders. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014;41(2):213-228. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2014.02.004 [PubMed: 24845486] 204. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Stimulant intoxication and withdrawal can result in acute issues and complications that require urgent medical management (see Appendix L).”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Patient Evaluation:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Attending to this patient population's SDOH would be expected to support overall health and wellness but not necessarily reduce substance use.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 43.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, some patients may benefit from SGM-focused programs.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity:
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The informational value of testing depends on the clinical importance of the outcome.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Toxicology Testing:
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Among homeless and unstably housed women in San Francisco, 47% reported use of cocaine or methamphetamine in the past 6 months, and 14% of those who did not use stimulants at baseline initiated stimulant use within 6 months.231”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 43.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [231] 231. Grabowski J, Rhoades H, Schmitz J, et al. Dextroamphetamine for Cocaine-Dependence Treatment: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001;21(5):522. [PubMed: 11593078] 353. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The amount of levamisole contaminating the drug supply and the resulting degree of clinical concern varies by region and over time.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Body Stuffing or Packing:
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Immunoassays for the cocaine metabolite, benzoylecgonine, have high sensitivity and specificity, whereas available immunoassays for amphetamines have lower specificity and often require confirmatory testing.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Toxicology Testing:
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Stimulant use is highly prevalent among individuals who are homeless; a recent systematic review found that roughly 30% endorsed past year cocaine use.230”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 43.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [230] 230. Charnaud B, Griffiths V. Levels of intravenous drug misuse among clients prescribed oral dexamphetamine or oral methadone: a comparison. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998;52(1):79-84. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(98)00052-0 [PubMed: 9788010] 351. Galloway GP, Buscemi R, Coyle JR, et al. A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Sustained- Release Dextroamphetamine for Treatment of Methamphetamine Addiction. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89(2):276-282. doi:10.1038/clpt.2010.307 [PubMed: 21178989] 352. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Homelessness and housing insecurity create significant barriers to both treatment and recovery.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 43.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Untreated withdrawal also increases the risk for return to stimulant use, which poses direct risks to the fetus.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Managing Stimulant Intoxication and Withdrawal in Pregnant
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While some preliminary findings have shown potential promise, outcomes need to be replicated in larger cohorts before adoption in clinical practice.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > a.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“However, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends screening for substance use, including stimulants, in primary care settings.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Screening
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [2] 2. US Preventive Services Task Force, Krist AH, Davidson KW, et al. Screening for unhealthy drug use: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2020;323(22):2301. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.8020 [PubMed: 32515821] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While some medications used to treat intoxication or acute withdrawal may pose risks to the fetus, greater risks may occur as a result of untreated stimulant intoxication or withdrawal.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Managing Stimulant Intoxication and Withdrawal in Pregnant
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The consensus of the CGC was that a seizure is well-explained by substance use or withdrawal when, for example, the patient is known to use medications that lower seizure threshold (eg, tramadol, bupropion) or has a history of stimulant-or other substance userelated seizure.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 70.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Common indications for waiving a comprehensive neurological evaluation following a seizure include:”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 70.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The recommendations in this Guideline are based on a review of existing guidelines and the clinical expertise of the CGC.184,244”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Setting Determination
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [184] 184. Connors NJ, Alsakha A, Larocque A, Hoffman RS, Landry T, Gosselin S. Antipsychotics for the treatment of sympathomimetic toxicity: A systematic review. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(10):1880-1890. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.001 [PubMed: 30639129] 264. Alexander PD, Gicas KM, Willi TS, et al. A comparison of psychotic symptoms in subjects with methamphetamine versus cocaine dependence. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017;234(9- 10):1535-1547. doi:10.1007/s00213-017-4551-7 [PubMed: 28190084] 265. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [244] 244. Minařík J, Gabrhelík R, Malcolm R, Pavlovská A, Miller P. Methylphenidate substitution for methamphetamine addiction and implications for future randomized clinical trials: a unique case series. J Subst Use. 2016;21(4):435-438. doi:10.3109/14659891.2015.1045047 373. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Hyperthermia caused by autonomic hyperactivity during acute stimulant intoxication can complicate management of intoxication and may require cooling interventions.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 69.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [271]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Waiving a full workup saves time and resources, including avoiding an overnight hospital stay and follow-up appointments.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 70.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The benefits of engaging patients in meaningful harm reduction practices are significant”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Early Intervention for Risky Stimulant Use
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the CGC noted that the benefits of effective engagement in treatment are likely substantial and there is no evidence of harm.302”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 80.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [302]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the CGC agreed that education on and access to overdose reversal medications are likely to be beneficial with relatively little risk.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 84.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Overdose reversal medications such as naloxone prevent opioid overdose deaths.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is a necessary first step to providing harm reduction education and treatment for stimulant use, which can reduce harms stemming from use and increase readiness to change and motivation for treatment.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Early Intervention for Risky Stimulant Use
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The US is currently experiencing an historic rise in drug overdoses and overdose deaths due to high-potency synthetic opioids.303”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 84.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [303]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subgroup population differences may influence the preferred intervention (eg, transgender, IPV or trauma history, patients and/or their partners who are HIV positive).”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Assessment
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“if patients are engaging in compulsive sexual behaviors that cause them distress, they may benefit from referral to qualified treatment professionals.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > • Table 62. Prevention Supervised Consumption
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A positive screen can indicate the need for counseling or other interventions to prevent misuse of psychostimulant medications.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Screening
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the possibility exists for patients to experience feelings of stigma or bias, this may depend on clinician expertise in interviewing.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Assessment
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While no direct evidence was found supporting this recommendation, contextualizing the reasons for patients' stimulant use can facilitate conversations around harm reduction.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Assessment
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The CGC noted the risk of misusing PDMP information would not preclude the benefit of initiating a conversation about a patient's prescriptions.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Screening
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“While the evidence is weak, clinical experience suggests that the information gained by checking the PDMP can lead to large benefits in patient safety and indicate the need for patient education and/or treatment interventions.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Screening
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [293]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similar to presumptive drug testing, these test strips may also produce false positives that may limit patient reliance on the results.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 84.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While implementation of this practice is straightforward, clinicians may require training on trauma-sensitive and culturally humble approaches to ask about the context of substance use in a nonjudgmental and destigmatizing manner.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Assessment
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Clinical experience suggests that patients who engage in nonmedical use of prescription stimulants are more likely to exhibit symptoms of ADHD and should be evaluated for ADHD.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Assessment
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The possibility of confidentiality violations through medical record documentation exists, but the CGC deemed the likelihood of this happening low.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Assessment
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The CGC cautioned that clinicians could misinterpret the PDMP and use it punitively, though the likelihood of this can be reduced through education.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Screening
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The CGC concluded that the benefits of identifying individuals who would be helped by targeted harm reduction interventions outweighed the risks.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Assessment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“A variety of screening tools are available to screen for injection drug use.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > Assessment
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [295]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Screening for StUD presents an opportunity for clinicians to engage patients in brief interventions using motivational interviewing (MI) or motivational enhancement therapy (MET) to facilitate referrals for assessment for StUD, if indicated.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 92.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some patients may require monitoring for emergence of renal and cardiac concerns.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 92.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While no direct evidence was found regarding referrals to obstetric care providers, given the known benefits of prenatal care, such referrals are expected to be beneficial.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 92.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Existing guidelines stress using multidisciplinary teams, providing comprehensive prenatal care, and screening for complications of pregnancy and fetal health.
In the paper
“People who use stimulants are well known to be at high risk of dental complications-such as poor dentition, dental caries, and abscesses-and poor oral health is associated with subsequent malnutrition.325”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > 92.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [325]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper relies on this without support.
Co-occurring conditions including ADHD, depression, anxiety, eating disorders, and other substance use disorders are common in patients with stimulant use disorder.
“Co-occurring conditions-including but not limited to attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, anxiety, eating disorders, and other SUDs-are common in patients with StUD.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Chlorpromazine and clozapine may increase the risk of seizures in patients with stimulant-induced psychosis.
“Clinicians should avoid the use of chlorpromazine and clozapine for stimulant-induced psychosis as these medications may place patients at increased risk for seizures”
The paper relies on this without support.
Suicidality may increase during waning intoxication and acute withdrawal.
“in particular, suicidality may increase during waning intoxication and acute withdrawal”
The paper relies on this without support.
Calcium channel blockers, alpha-1 adrenergic antagonists, alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, and nitric oxide-mediated vasodilators may be most beneficial for treating hypertension and vasospasm.
“While calcium channel blockers, alpha-1 adrenergic antagonists, alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, and nitric oxide-mediated vasodilators may be most beneficial in treating hypertension and vasospasm”
The paper relies on this without support.
These agents may cause side effects including poor control over tachycardia or reflex tachycardia.
“clinicians should be alert to potential side effects, including poor control over tachycardia or reflex tachycardia”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cocaine has local anesthetic-like effects at sodium channels and can cause QRS widening with impaired cardiac contractility during severe cocaine intoxication.
“Cocaine has local anesthetic-like effects at sodium channels and can cause QRS widening with impairment in cardiac contractility during severe cocaine intoxication.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Sodium bicarbonate improves conduction block and contractility and also improves metabolic acidosis if present.
“clinicians should administer sodium bicarbonate to improve the conduction block and contractility; this will also improve metabolic acidosis if present”
The paper relies on this without support.
HIV, viral hepatitis, and sexually transmitted infections are more prevalent among patients with StUD, which justifies routine baseline testing.
“the higher prevalence of HIV, viral hepatitis, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in patients with StUD justifies baseline testing in this population.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Non-infectious disease screening labs such as CBC and CMP can help identify comorbidities in patients with StUD.
“non-infectious disease screening labs (eg, complete blood count [CBC], comprehensive metabolic panel [CMP]) can help identify comorbidities as part of a comprehensive assessment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Tests for novel or designer stimulants are often expensive and have limited availability.
“The CGC noted that tests for novel or designer stimulants are often expensive with limited availability.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Concern about interpreting the federal Anti-Kickback Statute has been a significant policy barrier to contingency management.
“Concern regarding interpretation of this statute has been a significant policy barrier to the use of CM.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Implementation of contingency management in compliance with the OIG Final Rule is not well defined.
“However, implementation of CM in compliance with the OIG Final Rule is not well defined”
The paper relies on this without support.
Financial cost is a commonly reported barrier to implementing contingency management.
“A commonly reported barrier to implementing CM is financial cost.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A consistent funding source, typically government funding or payer reimbursement, is needed to support contingency management implementation.
“A consistent funding source-typically government funding or payer reimbursementis needed to support implementation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Contingency management interventions require programs to develop protocols and dedicate resources, including staff training and time.
“CM interventions require programs to develop protocols around its use and dedicate resources, including staff training and time, toward its implementation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Patients with StUD often have co-occurring mental health and biomedical needs.
“Patients with StUD often have co-occurring mental health and biomedical needs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Identifying urgent or emergent biomedical or psychiatric concerns is necessary to preserve the health and safety of patients presenting for StUD treatment.
“Identifying urgent or emergent biomedical or psychiatric concerns is necessary to preserve the health and safety of patients who present for StUD treatment”
The paper relies on this without support.
Effective CM implementation requires funding, training, drug-testing capacity, and usually at least twice-weekly clinical contact.
“Effective implementation of CM requires availability of several components, including funding, training, capacity for drug testing, and-typically-at least twice weekly clinical engagement.”
The paper relies on this without support.
CBT is widely utilized and accepted.
“CBT is a widely utilized and accepted treatment modality.”
The paper relies on this without support.
CBT requires highly trained clinicians for proper delivery.
“CBT does require resourcesnamely, the availability of highly trained clinicians for proper delivery.”
The paper relies on this without support.
CBT can be delivered in group sessions, making it more feasible for many programs than other behavioral interventions.
“On the other hand, CBT can be delivered in group sessions, which makes it more feasible for many programs compared to other behavioral interventions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Matrix Model is compatible with many SUD treatment programs' structure and staffing and has been widely adopted.
“With respect to implementation, the Matrix Model is compatible with the structure and staffing at many SUD treatment programs and has been widely adopted, demonstrating feasibility.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Little regulatory oversight exists for many technology-based tools.
“Another point of caution is that little regulatory oversight currently exists for many of these technology-based tools.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most digital technologies have little to no evidence of effectiveness, and existing evidence may be low quality or conflicted.
“Most digital technologies have little to no evidence of effectiveness; existing evidence may be low quality or those conducting the studies may have conflicts of interest.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Addiction is a chronic illness best addressed with a chronic care model.
“Addiction is a chronic illness best addressed with a chronic care model of disease management.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No pharmacotherapies have been approved by the FDA for StUD.
“No pharmacotherapies have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of StUD.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Generic bupropion is commonly available on formularies and relatively easy to titrate.
“The generic formulation of bupropion is commonly available on medication formularies, and it is relatively easy to titrate dosing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Confirmation of opioid-free status is required before initiating naltrexone.
“Confirmation of the patient's opioid free status is required prior to initiating naltrexone.”
The paper relies on this without support.
At publication, bupropion and oral naltrexone are available in generic formulations.
“At the time of this publication, bupropion and oral naltrexone are available in generic formulations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Mirtazapine is widely available and straightforward to prescribe.
“Mirtazapine is widely available and straightforward to prescribe.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Mirtazapine's benefits may be tempered by side effects such as weight gain, drowsiness, and metabolic issues for some patients.
“These benefits may be tempered by side effects such as weight gain, drowsiness, and metabolic issues (eg, poor glucose control) for some patients.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Modafinil inhibits metabolism of hormonal contraceptives and can reduce the effectiveness of this type of birth control.
“The CGC noted that modafinil inhibits metabolism of hormonal contraceptives and can reduce the effectiveness of this type of birth control;”
The paper relies on this without support.
People with stimulant use disorders and co-occurring psychiatric disorders experience additional barriers to accessing and remaining in substance use disorder treatment.
“The CGC noted that people with StUDs and co-occurring psychiatric disorders experience additional barriers to accessing and remaining in SUD treatment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Studies on integrated behavioral treatment approaches are limited and heterogeneous in design, target population, and outcomes of evaluation.
“Studies on integrated behavioral treatment approaches are limited and heterogeneous in design, target population, and outcomes of evaluation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and/or attentional problems are commonly observed during periods of ongoing stimulant use and withdrawal.
“Symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and/or attentional problems are commonly observed during periods of ongoing stimulant use and withdrawal.”
The paper relies on this without support.
These symptoms often resolve with effective management of withdrawal.
“While these symptoms often resolve with effective management of withdrawal,”
The paper relies on this without support.
Adherence to and effectiveness of medications for psychiatric conditions is likely to be reduced in the context of ongoing stimulant use.
“Clinicians should be aware that adherence to and effectiveness of medications for psychiatric conditions is likely to be reduced in the context of ongoing stimulant use.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Individuals with stimulant use disorder who have acquired tolerance for the effects of stimulants may require higher doses of prescribed psychostimulant medications to reach clinical benefit.
“The CGC noted that individuals with StUD who have acquired tolerance for the effects of stimulants may require higher doses of prescribed psychostimulant medications to reach clinical benefit.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Addressing ADHD symptoms as part of StUD treatment improves outcomes for patients with co-occurring StUD and ADHD.
“For patients with co-occurring StUD and ADHD, clinicians should address ADHD symptoms as part of the treatment of StUD”
The paper relies on this without support.
Extended-release psychostimulant formulations reduce misuse or diversion risk compared with other formulations in patients with co-occurring StUD and ADHD.
“using extended-release formulations (Clinical consensus, Strong Recommendation)”
The paper relies on this without support.
Monitoring strategies such as pill counts, drug testing, more frequent clinical contact, and more frequent PDMP checks reduce misuse or diversion in patients prescribed psychostimulants.
“maintaining a level of monitoring commensurate with the risk profile for the given medication and patient-monitoring may include pill counts, drug testing, more frequent clinical contact, and more frequent PDMP checks”
The paper relies on this without support.
Direct observation of medication administration by a parent, health professional, or other trusted adult reduces misuse or diversion in adolescent and young adult patients with co-occurring StUD and ADHD.
“arranging for a parent, health professional (eg, trained school nurse), or other trusted adult to directly observe administration of the medication, especially if using a short-acting formulation”
The paper relies on this without support.
Safe storage and restricted access to controlled medications reduce misuse or diversion in adolescent and young adult patients.
“counseling families on the importance of safely storing and restricting access to controlled medications”
The paper relies on this without support.
Integrated treatment of underlying ADHD or eating disorders improves StUD outcomes in adolescents and young adults.
“a general principle in the care of adolescents and young adults with SUD is to address underlying mental health conditions with an integrated approach.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Age-specific treatment and support programs improve outcomes for adolescents and young adults with StUD.
“If available, clinicians should refer adolescent and young adult patients to agespecific treatment and support programs to address identified biopsychosocial needs”
The paper relies on this without support.
Family involvement improves engagement and efficacy of treatment for adolescents and young adults with StUD.
“the CGC recognized that family involvement can enhance both engagement and efficacy of treatment in adult populations and would be a worthwhile endeavor to explore with adolescent and young adult patients.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Home drug testing without oversight of a trained clinician is harmful or less useful than clinician-overseen drug testing for assessing stimulant use in adolescents and young adults.
“Clinicians should counsel parents/guardians not to conduct drug tests at home to assess stimulant use in adolescents and young adults without the oversight of a trained clinician.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Increasing prenatal care attendance improves outcomes for pregnant patients with StUD and their children.
“Clinicians should consider CM to incentivize attendance at prenatal appointments, if feasible, in addition to usual targets (eg, stimulant abstinence).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Additional treatment support around the time of birth reduces return to stimulant use and overdose in postpartum patients.
“Clinicians should consider providing additional treatment support around the time of birth; the postpartum period is typically a time of increased stress, which may lead to increased risk of return to stimulant use and heightened potential for overdose.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Breastmilk may contain high levels of stimulants, which has the potential to harm infants.
“breastmilk may contain high levels of stimulants, which has the potential to harm infants.”
The paper relies on this without support.
None of the medications studied for treatment of stimulant use disorder are contraindicated during breastfeeding.
“The CGC noted that none of the medications that have been studied for treatment of StUD are contraindicated during breastfeeding.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no reason to expect telephone monitoring and counseling to be differentially effective for patients with amphetamine-type stimulant use disorder compared with cocaine use disorder.
“The CGC noted that there is no reason to expect this practice to be differentially effective for patients with ATS use disorder.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the guideline committee's clinical experience, suicide risk may resolve more rapidly in stimulant withdrawal than in other substance withdrawal syndromes.
“In the CGC's clinical experience, suicide risk may resolve more rapidly in stimulant withdrawal compared to other substance withdrawal syndromes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
People with physical and cognitive disabilities have complex clinical needs.
“However, people with physical and cognitive disabilities have complex clinical needs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Body stuffing or packing can result in more severe and prolonged symptoms of intoxication and should be managed in acute care settings.
“Body stuffing or packing can result in more severe and prolonged symptoms of intoxication and should be managed in acute care settings.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Observation of clinical effects and patient self-report are often more informative and more immediate than toxicology testing.
“Observation of clinical effects and patient self-report are often more informative and more immediate than toxicology testing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Toxicology tests indicate exposure that may have occurred 72 or more hours prior.
“These tests indicate exposure, which may have occurred 72 or more hours prior.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Toxicology testing cannot detect every adulterant or contaminant.
“Clinicians should understand it is impossible to detect all adulterants or contaminants with toxicology testing and should be careful to avoid overinterpretation of findings.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Benzodiazepines are commonly regarded as the first-line option for stimulant-induced agitation.
“Benzodiazepines are generally considered first-line treatment for the management of stimulant-induced agitation (see Appendix N for additional agents to consider).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Onset of intramuscular ketamine is very rapid.
“Onset of IM ketamine is very rapid, which makes it particularly useful when a patient is experiencing severe agitation such that placing an IV would be challenging and delay effective care.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Suicide risk may rise as intoxication wanes and acute withdrawal begins.
“Clinicians should monitor for progression of psychiatric symptoms, breakthrough psychosis, suicidality, and emergence of trauma-related symptoms; in particular, suicidality may increase during waning intoxication and acute withdrawal (Clinical consensus, Conditional Recommendation).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Stimulant intoxication or withdrawal can worsen serious co-occurring medical or psychiatric conditions.
“Serious co-occurring medical or psychiatric health concerns can be exacerbated by stimulant intoxication or withdrawal.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Taking opioids, alcohol, or other sedatives together with stimulants can unpredictably change the timing and severity of intoxication and acute effects.
“Co-intoxication with opioids, alcohol, or other sedatives can alter both the time course and severity of intoxication and acute effects in unexpected ways.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Transfers involve some risk because patients may choose to leave treatment rather than initiate and engage in treatment elsewhere.
“However, transfers involve some risk, as patients may choose to leave treatment rather than initiate and engage in treatment elsewhere.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Restraints can temporarily prevent violent behavior but increase risk of injury to patients and staff and can be psychologically traumatic.
“While restraints can temporarily prevent violent behavior, their application increases the risk of injury to patients and staff and can be psychologically traumatic for patients.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Long-acting antihypertensives carry a risk of abrupt hemodynamic collapse.
“Long-acting antihypertensives should be avoided because of the risk of abrupt hemodynamic collapse.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Beta blockers with concomitant alpha-1 antagonism have a low risk of unopposed alpha stimulation.
“If considering pharmacotherapy with a beta blocker, one with concomitant alpha-1 antagonism (eg, labetalol) is preferred due to low risk of unopposed alpha stimulation, although this risk is still a debate in the field.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Treatment needs are determined by dynamic factors and will change throughout intoxication or withdrawal.
“Treatment needs are determined by a number of dynamic factors, meaning they will change throughout the course of intoxication or withdrawal.”
The paper relies on this without support.
High fever, seizure, chest pain, psychosis, and suicidality are clinical features that usually signal a need for emergency medical treatment.
“Clinical features that typically indicate the need for emergency medical treatment include high fever, seizure, chest pain, psychosis, and suicidality.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Engaging the patient as an active partner is important to alleviating distress and reducing risk.
“The process of engaging the patient as an active partner in their assessment, treatment, and recovery is important to alleviating distress and reducing risk.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Health information technologies and patient navigators may help make transfers effective by bridging care across settings.
“The use of health information technologies and patient navigators may help facilitate effective transfers by bridging care between settings.”
The paper relies on this without support.
When medication shortages limit recommended drugs, expert consultation may be especially useful.
“Expert consultation may be particularly helpful when medication shortages impact the availability of recommended medications.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Levamisole is a common adulterant in cocaine supply and can cause immunosuppression, particularly neutropenia, and small vessel vasculitis.
“When analyzing CBC results for patients with cocaine intoxication or withdrawal, clinicians should be alert to neutrophil levels, as levamisole is a common adulterant in the cocaine supply and can cause immunosuppression -in particular, neutropenia-and small vessel vasculitis (Clinical consensus, Conditional Recommendation).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The growing influence of synthetic drugs and drug adulteration and contamination means clinicians may increasingly make treatment decisions without toxicological confirmation.
“The growing influence of synthetic drugs and drug adulteration and contamination means that clinicians may be making treatment decisions in the absence of toxicological confirmation with increasing frequency.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Regional surveillance reporting is often available on prevalence of novel psychoactive substances, including stimulants and their frequency of detection with other substances.
“Regional surveillance reporting is often available on the prevalence of novel psychoactive substances, including stimulants and their frequency of detection with other substances.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Acidosis from stimulant intoxication is typically caused by excessive movement or muscle activity and drug-specific effects such as temperature elevation, with seizures possibly contributing.
“Acidosis from stimulant intoxication is typically due to a combination of excessive movement or muscle activity and drug-specific effects (eg, temperature elevation).Seizures may also contribute to acidosis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cardiac complications of stimulant use include chest pain with elevated risks for acute coronary syndrome and cardiac-related mortality.
“Cardiac complications of stimulant use include chest pain with elevated risks for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and cardiac-related mortality.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Hyperadrenergic states secondary to stimulant use can lead to hypertension and tachycardia.
“Hyperadrenergic states secondary to stimulant use can lead to hypertension and tachycardia.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Unopposed alpha stimulation can cause an acute increase in blood pressure and/or coronary artery vasoconstriction after beta blocker administration.
“Unopposed alpha stimulation can result in an acute increase in blood pressure and/or coronary artery vasoconstriction following beta blocker administration.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Dehydration is a common consequence of stimulant intoxication that can result in electrolyte and fluid imbalances.
“Dehydration is a common consequence of stimulant intoxication that can result in electrolyte and fluid imbalances.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Neutropenia is generally rare and transient but can be life-threatening.
“Neutropenia, while generally rare and transient, can be life-threatening.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Neutropenia typically improves quickly in most patients after cessation of levamisole exposure.
“While neutropenia typically improves quickly in most patients after cessation of exposure to levamisole”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cocaine has local anesthetic effects and can cause QRS widening and impaired cardiac contractility.
“Cocaine has local anesthetic effects and can cause QRS widening and impaired cardiac contractility.”
The paper relies on this without support.
QRS widening occurs when large amounts of cocaine are consumed rapidly, such as in body stuffing or packing.
“QRS widening is a particular complication that occurs when large amounts of cocaine are consumed rapidly, such as in body stuffing or packing”
The paper relies on this without support.
Sodium bicarbonate treatment can exacerbate QT prolongation by lowering serum potassium.
“However, this treatment can exacerbate the risk for QT prolongation, if present, by lowering serum potassium concentrations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
3% hypertonic saline does not correct metabolic acidosis.
“but it does not correct metabolic acidosis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Rhabdomyolysis in stimulant intoxication most commonly occurs after severe agitation and hyperthermia.
“In patients with stimulant intoxication, rhabdomyolysis most commonly occurs following episodes of severe agitation and hyperthermia.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Urinary alkalinization inhibits amphetamine elimination.
“avoiding urinary alkalinization as it inhibits amphetamine elimination”
The paper relies on this without support.
Seizures are one of the most severe complications of stimulant toxicity.
“Seizures are one of the most severe complications of stimulant toxicity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Some medications such as bupropion raise the risk for seizures.
“Some medications, such as bupropion, raise the risk for seizures.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Seizure may be related to hyponatremia when stimulants are used and is more likely with polysubstance rather than single substance use.
“Seizure may be related to hyponatremia when stimulants are used and is also more likely with polysubstance rather than single substance use.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Medications may help reduce signs and symptoms associated with stimulant withdrawal.
“Medications may help reduce signs and symptoms associated with stimulant withdrawal.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Signs and symptoms that may require pharmacotherapeutic management include agitation, psychosis, depression, and insomnia.
“Signs and symptoms that may require pharmacotherapeutic management include agitation, psychosis, depression, and insomnia, among others.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many patients with StUD experience persistent post-acute withdrawal symptoms including depression, anxiety, insomnia, and paranoia that can last weeks to months.
“Many patients with StUD also experience persistent challenges with post-acute symptoms of withdrawal-including depression, anxiety, insomnia, and paranoia, among others-that can last for weeks to months.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Patients may experience increased sleep during initial withdrawal followed by persistent sleep disturbances.
“Patients may experience increased sleep during the initial withdrawal period, followed by sleep disturbances that can be persistent.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is often extremely difficult, if not impossible, to differentiate methamphetamine-induced hypertension from gestational hypertension.
“It is often extremely difficult, if not impossible, to differentiate methamphetamine-induced hypertension from gestational hypertension.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A variety of validated screening tools are available to screen for risky sexual behaviors.
“A variety of validated screening tools are available to screen for risky sexual behaviors.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The medical workup of patients who misuse stimulants but do not meet StUD criteria is similar to that for StUD.
“Although the context is different, the medical workup of patients who misuse stimulants but do not meet the diagnostic criteria for StUD is similar to that for StUD.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Overdose reversal medications such as naloxone prevent opioid overdose deaths.
“Overdose reversal medications such as naloxone are well known to prevent opioid overdose deaths.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Drug checking is becoming a standard harm reduction practice.
“Drug checking is becoming a standard harm reduction practice.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Abrupt discontinuation or reduction in stimulant use can cause stimulant withdrawal syndrome.
“Abrupt discontinuation or reduction in stimulant use can cause stimulant withdrawal syndrome.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The current standard of care for managing stimulant withdrawal focuses on ameliorating presenting signs and symptoms and minimizing risks.
“The current standard of care for managing stimulant withdrawal focuses on ameliorating presenting signs and symptoms and minimizing risks.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Lack of community acceptance can be a barrier to implementing programs focused on safer injection practices.
“lack of community acceptance can be a barrier to implementing programs focused on safer injection practices”
The paper relies on this without support.
Treatment of StUD in patients who are pregnant presents unique clinical challenges.
“Treatment of StUD in patients who are pregnant presents unique clinical challenges.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Existing guidelines stress using multidisciplinary teams, providing comprehensive prenatal care, and screening for complications of pregnancy and fetal health.
“Existing guidelines stress using multidisciplinary teams, providing comprehensive prenatal care, and screening for complications of pregnancy and fetal health.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > b.
“Clinical trials suggest that methylphenidate for ATS use disorder may be more effective with patients who have a moderate or higher frequency of ATS use at treatment start, which the trials defined as greater than 10 days per month.”
§ The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members > a.
“Clinicians can give long-acting MPH formulations additional consideration for patients with moderate or higher frequency of ATS use at treatment start (ie, 10 or more days per month; Low certainty, Conditional Recommendation).”
Citations
Cites
Items 201–328 of 328
Gibbs, E. L., Kass, A. E., Eichen, D. M., Fitzsimmons‐Craft, E. E., Trockel, M., Wilfley, D. E., & Taylor, C. B. (2016) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.2016.1138477 · Cited by 52
Counselor Attitudes toward the Use of Motivational Incentives in Addiction Treatment
Ducharme, L. J., Knudsen, H. K., Abraham, A. J., & Roman, P. M. (2010) · The American Journal on Addictions · doi:10.1111/j.1521-0391.2010.00081.x · Cited by 50
Strathdee, S. A., Bristow, C., Gaines, T. L., & SHOPTAW, S. J. (2020) · Sexually Transmitted Diseases · doi:10.1097/olq.0000000000001341 · Cited by 50
Dexamphetamine substitution in the treatment of amphetamine abuse: an initial investigation
White, R. (2000) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.9522299.x · Cited by 49
DeFulio, A., Rzeszutek, M. J., Furgeson, J., Ryan, S. A., & Rezania, S. (2020) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108188 · Cited by 49
Schaub, M., Sullivan, R., Haug, S., & Stark, L. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2244 · Cited by 47
Technology-Based Contingency Management in the Treatment of Substance-Use Disorders
Dallery, J., Raiff, B. R., Grabinski, M. J., & Marsch, L. A. (2019) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-019-00214-1 · Cited by 47
Risk factors for stimulant use among homeless and unstably housed adult women
Riley, E. D., Shumway, M., Knight, K. R., Guzman, D., Cohen, J., & Weiser, S. D. (2015) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.05.023 · Cited by 46
McKay, J. R., Lynch, K. G., Coviello, D., Morrison, R., Cary, M. S., Skalina, L., & Plebani, J. (2010) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018139 · Cited by 46
Systematic review of the toxicological and radiological features of body packing
Cappelletti, S., Piacentino, D., Sani, G., Bottoni, E., Fiore, P. A., Aromatario, M., & Ciallella, C. (2016) · International Journal of Legal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00414-015-1310-3 · Cited by 46
Modafinil and sleep architecture in an inpatient–outpatient treatment study of cocaine dependence
MORGAN, P. T., Angarita, G. A., Canavan, S. V., Pittman, B. P., Oberleitner, L., Malison, R. T., Mohsenin, V., Hodges, S. E., Easton, C. J., McKee, S. A., et al. (2016) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.12.004 · Cited by 45
Ye, T., Sun, D., Dong, G., Xu, G., Wang, L., Du, J., Ren, P., & Yu, S. (2018) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-017-0463-5 · Cited by 45
A Systematic Review of the Relationship between Child Sexual Abuse and Substance Use Issues
Fletcher, K. (2021) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2020.1801937 · Cited by 45
Best Practices for Managing Postpartum Hypertension
Kumar, N. R., Hirshberg, A., & Srinivas, S. K. (2022) · Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports · doi:10.1007/s13669-022-00343-6 · Cited by 45
Mooney, M. E., Herin, D. V., Specker, S. M., Babb, D. A., LEVIN, F. R., & Grabowski, J. G. (2015) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.05.042 · Cited by 44
Schoenberger, S. F., Park, T. W., dellaBitta, V., Hadland, S. E., & Bagley, S. M. (2022) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-021-06934-y · Cited by 44
Tait, R. J., McKetin, R., Kay-Lambkin, F., Carron-Arthur, B., Bennett, A., Bennett, K., Christensen, H., & Griffiths, K. M. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3778 · Cited by 43
Kon, A. A., Pretzlaff, R. K., & Marcin, J. P. (2004) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.12.006 · Cited by 43
Charnaud, B., & Griffiths, V. (1998) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/s0376-8716(98)00052-0 · Cited by 43
Rezaei, F., Emami, M., Zahed, S., Morabbi, M.-J., Farahzadi, M., & Akhondzadeh, S. (2015) · DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1186/s40199-015-0092-y · Cited by 43
Adolescent Substance Use Disorders
Simon, K. M., Levy, S. J., & Bukstein, O. G. (2022) · NEJM Evidence · doi:10.1056/evidra2200051 · Cited by 43
Anderson, E. S., Rusoja, E., Luftig, J., Ullal, M., Shardha, R., Schwimmer, H., Friedman, A., Hailozian, C., & Herring, A. A. (2023) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.09.025 · Cited by 42
Smith, D. K., Pan, Y., Rose, C. E., Pals, S. L., Mehta, S. H., Kirk, G. D., & Herbst, J. H. (2015) · Journal of Addiction Medicine · doi:10.1097/adm.0000000000000123 · Cited by 41
McCann, D. J., & Li, S. (2012) · CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1755-5949.2011.00263.x · Cited by 41
McKay, J., Horn, D. V., Lynch, K., Ivey, M. A., Cary, M. S., Drapkin, M. L., Coviello, D. M., & Plebani, J. G. (2013) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034265 · Cited by 41
Dürsteler‐MacFarland, K. M., Farronato, N. S., Strasser, J., Boss, J., Kuntze, M. F., Petitjean, S. A., Bürki, C., & Wiesbeck, G. A. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/jcp.0b013e31827bfff4 · Cited by 41
Harris, M., Scott, J., Wright, T., Brathwaite, R., Ciccarone, D., & Hope, V. (2019) · Harm Reduction Journal · doi:10.1186/s12954-019-0330-6 · Cited by 41
Contingency Management for Stimulant Use Disorder: Progress, Challenges, and Recommendations
Rawson, R. A., Erath, T. G., Chalk, M., Clark, H. W., McDaid, C., Wattenberg, S. A., Roll, J. M., McDonell, M. G., Parent, S., & Freese, T. E. (2023) · Journal of Ambulatory Care Management · doi:10.1097/jac.0000000000000450 · Cited by 41
Peak ages of risk for starting nonmedical use of prescription stimulants
Austic, E. A. (2015) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.03.034 · Cited by 38
Nuijten, M., Blanken, P., van den Brink, W., & Hendriks, V. (2014) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.02.024 · Cited by 38
Tait, R. J., McKetin, R., KAY‐LAMBKIN, F. J., Carron‐Arthur, B., Bennett, A., Bennett, K., Christensen, H. M., & Griffiths, K. M. (2014) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.3278 · Cited by 38
Prescription Stimulant Use and Hospitalization for Psychosis or Mania: A Population-Based Study
Cressman, A. M., Macdonald, E. M., Huang, A., Gomes, T., Paterson, M. J., Kurdyak, P. A., Mamdani, M. M., & Juurlink, D. N. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/jcp.0000000000000406 · Cited by 37
Modafinil Treatment of Cocaine Dependence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sangroula, D., Motiwala, F., Wagle, B., Shah, V. C., Hagi, K., & Lippmann, S. (2017) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2016.1276597 · Cited by 37
Committee Opinion No. 479: Methamphetamine Abuse in Women of Reproductive Age
(2011) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e318214784e · Cited by 37
Parker, R. B., Perry, G. Y., Horan, L. G., & Flowers, N. C. (1999) · Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology · doi:10.1097/00005344-199912000-00014 · Cited by 35
Guerrero, E. G., Cepeda, A., Duan, L., & Kim, T. (2012) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.05.006 · Cited by 35
Wilens, T., Zulauf, C., Martelon, M., Morrison, N. R., Simon, A., Carrellas, N. W., Yule, A., & Anselmo, R. (2016) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.14m09559 · Cited by 35
Dalton, K., Bishop, L., & Darcy, S. (2021) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107005 · Cited by 35
Pinals, D. A., Hovermale, L., Mauch, D., & Anacker, L. (2022) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201900505 · Cited by 35
Off-label and investigational drugs in the treatment of alcohol use disorder: A critical review
Fischler, P. V., Soyka, M., Seifritz, E., & Mutschler, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.927703 · Cited by 34
Das, M., Santos, D., Matheson, T., Santos, G., Chu, P. L., Vittinghoff, E., SHOPTAW, S. J., & Colfax, G. N. (2010) · AIDS · doi:10.1097/qad.0b013e328336e98b · Cited by 33
Bagley, S. M., Schoenberger, S. F., dellaBitta, V., Lunze, K., Barron, K., Hadland, S. E., & Park, T. W. (2023) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.08.026 · Cited by 33
Overdose and substance-related mortality after release from prison in Washington State: 2014–2019
O’Connor, A. W., Sears, J. M., & Fulton-Kehoe, D. (2022) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109655 · Cited by 33
Psychological interventions for co-occurring depression and substance use disorders
Hides, L., Quinn, C., Stoyanov, S., Kavanagh, D., & Baker, A. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009501.pub2 · Cited by 32
Levamisole exposure and hematologic indices in cocaine users
Chai, P. R., Bastan, W., Machan, J., Hack, J. B., & Babu, K. M. (2011) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01202.x · Cited by 31
Treatments for Adolescents With Comorbid ADHD and Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review
Zaso, M. J., Park, A., & Antshel, K. M. (2020) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/1087054715569280 · Cited by 31
Rezaei, F., Ghaderi, E., Mardani, R., Hamidi, S., & Hassanzadeh, K. (2016) · Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/fcp.12178 · Cited by 31
Dow-Fleisner, S. J., Lomness, A., & Woolgar, L. (2022) · Emerging Trends in Drugs, Addictions, and Health · doi:10.1016/j.etdah.2022.100046 · Cited by 31
Kirby, K. C., Carpenedo, C. M., Stitzer, M. L., Dugosh, K. L., Petry, N. M., Roll, J. M., Saladin, M. E., Cohen, A. J., Hamilton, J., Reese, K., et al. (2012) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2011.09.004 · Cited by 30
Baldaçara, L., Cogo-Moreira, H., Parreira, B. L., Diniz, T. A., Milhomem, J. J., Fernandes, C. C., & Lacerda, A. L. T. (2016) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.14m09377 · Cited by 30
A review on modafinil: the characteristics, function, and use in critical care
Hashemian, S. M., & Farhadi, T. (2020) · Journal of Drug Assessment · doi:10.1080/21556660.2020.1745209 · Cited by 30
McNeil, R., Fleming, T., Collins, A. B., Czechaczek, S., Mayer, S., & Boyd, J. (2021) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108666 · Cited by 30
A comparison of psychotic symptoms in subjects with methamphetamine versus cocaine dependence
Alexander, P. D., Gicas, K. M., Willi, T. S., Kim, C. N., Boyeva, V., Procyshyn, R. M., Smith, G. N., Thornton, A. E., Panenka, W. J., Jones, A. A., et al. (2017) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-017-4551-7 · Cited by 29
Rash, C. J., Alessi, S. M., & Petry, N. M. (2017) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2016.07.001 · Cited by 28
Carrillo Beck, R., Szlapinski, J., Pacheco, N., Sabri Laghaei, S., Isard, R., Oudshoorn, A., & Marshall, C. A. (2022) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.13716 · Cited by 28
Dissemination of Contingency Management for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder
DeFulio, A. (2023) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-022-00328-z · Cited by 28
Karila, L., Leroy, C., Dubol, M., Trichard, C., Mabondo, A., Marill, C., Dubois, A., Bordas, N., Martinot, J.-L., Reynaud, M., et al. (2016) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2016.28 · Cited by 27
Who benefits from extended continuing care for cocaine dependence?
McKay, J. R., Van Horn, D. H. A., Lynch, K. G., Ivey, M., Cary, M. S., Drapkin, M., & Coviello, D. (2014) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.11.019 · Cited by 26
Feasibility and effectiveness of computer-based therapy in community treatment
Brooks, A. C., Ryder, D., Carise, D., & Kirby, K. C. (2010) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2010.06.003 · Cited by 26
Srisurapanont, M., Likhitsathian, S., Suttajit, S., Maneeton, N., Maneeton, B., Oon‐arom, A., & Suradom, C. (2021) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108467 · Cited by 26
Wilens, T. E., Woodward, D. W., Ko, J. D., Berger, A. F., Burke, C., & Yule, A. M. (2022) · Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1089/cap.2022.0016 · Cited by 26
Mooney, L. J., Hillhouse, M. P., Thomas, C., Ang, A., Sharma, G., Terry, G., Chang, L., Walker, R., Trivedi, M., Croteau, D., et al. (2016) · Journal of Addiction Medicine · doi:10.1097/adm.0000000000000218 · Cited by 25
Kiluk, B. D. (2019) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-019-00205-2 · Cited by 25
False-Positive Amphetamines in Urine Drug Screens: A 6-Year Review
Pope, J. D., Drummer, O. H., & Schneider, H. G. (2023) · Journal of Analytical Toxicology · doi:10.1093/jat/bkac089 · Cited by 25
Weng, M. K., Doshani, M., Khan, M. A., Frey, S. E., Ault, K. A., Moore, K. L., Hall, E. W., Morgan, R. L., Campos-Outcalt, D. E., Wester, C. W., et al. (2022) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ajt.16661 · Cited by 25
DeFulio, A., Furgeson, J. R., Brown, H. D., & Ryan, S. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.778992 · Cited by 24
Through a Different Lens: Occupational Health of Sex-Working Young Trans Women
Fisher, M. R., Turner, C., McFarland, W., Breslow, A. S., Wilson, E. C., & Arayasirikul, S. (2023) · Transgender Health · doi:10.1089/trgh.2021.0109 · Cited by 24
Antipsychotics for the treatment of sympathomimetic toxicity: A systematic review
Connors, N. J., Alsakha, A., Larocque, A., Hoffman, R. S., Landry, T., & Gosselin, S. (2019) · The American Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.001 · Cited by 23
(2019) · doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2019.08.007 · Cited by 23
Vorspan, F., Bellais, L., Romo, L., Bloch, V., Neira, R., & Lépine, J. (2012) · The American Journal on Addictions · doi:10.1111/j.1521-0391.2012.00248.x · Cited by 22
Marshall, B. D. L., Shoveller, J., Wood, E., Patterson, T. L., & Kerr, T. H. (2010) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-010-9876-8 · Cited by 22
Wilson, L. D., & Shelat, C. (2003) · Journal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology · doi:10.1081/clt-120025342 · Cited by 22
Methylphenidate produces a false-positive urine amphetamine screen
Manzi, S., Law, T., & Shannon, M. W. (2002) · Pediatric Emergency Care · doi:10.1097/00006565-200210000-00019 · Cited by 22
Adverse childhood experiences and stimulant use disorders among adults in the United States
Tang, S., Jones, C. M., Wisdom, A., Lin, H.-C., Bacon, S., & Houry, D. (2021) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113870 · Cited by 22
Guerin, A., & Kim, J. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182212259 · Cited by 22
DeFulio, A., Brown, H. D., Davidson, R. M., Regnier, S. D., Kang, N., & Ehart, M. (2023) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/s40617-022-00730-8 · Cited by 22
Miguel, A. C., Jordan, A., Kiluk, B. D., Nich, C., Babuscio, T. A., Mari, J. D. J., & Carroll, K. M. (2019) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2019.08.014 · Cited by 20
Methamphetamine use and technology-mediated psychosocial interventions: A mini-review
Rubenis, A. J., Baker, A., & Arunogiri, S. (2021) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106881 · Cited by 20
Surratt, H. L., Otachi, J. K., Williams, T., Gulley, J., Lockard, A. S., & Rains, R. (2020) · The Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/jrh.12388 · Cited by 18
Schepis, T. S., Ford, J. A., Wilens, T. E., Teter, C. J., & McCabe, S. E. (2020) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.20m13302 · Cited by 18
Confidentiality and Consent in Adolescent Substance Abuse: An Update
(2005) · AMA Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.3.pfor1-0503 · Cited by 17
Weisleder, P. (2007) · PubMed · Cited by 17
Kilwein, T. M., Goodman, E. L., Looby, A., & De Young, K. P. (2016) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22534 · Cited by 17
Disparities in the provision of perinatal care based on patient race in the United States
Byrn, M. A., Buys, E. A., Mujahid, M., & Madsen, K. (2023) · Birth · doi:10.1111/birt.12717 · Cited by 17
Implementing an evidence-based prize contingency management protocol for stimulant use
Rash, C. J. (2023) · Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.josat.2023.209079 · Cited by 17
Electrocardiographic findings associated with cocaine use in humans: a systematic review
Ramirez, F. D., Femenía, F., Simpson, C. S., Redfearn, D. P., Michael, K. A., & Baranchuk, A. (2012) · Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy · doi:10.1586/erc.11.152 · Cited by 16
Addiction and Autism: A Remarkable Comorbidity?
van Wijngaarden-Cremers, P. J. M. (2014) · Journal of Alcoholism and Drug Dependence · doi:10.4172/2329-6488.1000170 · Cited by 16
A comparison of four telephone-based counseling styles for recovering stimulant users.
Farabee, D., Cousins, S. J., Brecht, M.-L., Antonini, V. P., Lee, A. B., Brummer, J., Hemberg, J., Karno, M., & Rawson, R. A. (2013) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/a0029572 · Cited by 15
Giorgi, R. D., Cassar, C., D’Alò, G. L., Ciabattini, M., Minozzi, S., Economou, A., Tambelli, R., Lucchese, F., Saulle, R., Amato, L., et al. (2018) · Rivista di psichiatria · doi:10.1708/3000.30003 · Cited by 15
Sudden Cardiac Death of a Body Packer Due to Cocaine Cardiotoxicity
Pramanik, P., & Vidua, R. K. (2016) · Clinical Medicine Insights Pathology · doi:10.4137/cpath.s41070 · Cited by 14
Poison center consultation reduces hospital length of stay
Farkas, A., Kostic, M., Huang, C.-C., & Gummin, D. (2022) · Clinical Toxicology · doi:10.1080/15563650.2022.2039686 · Cited by 14
McKay, J. R., Van Horn, D., Ivey, M., Drapkin, M. L., Rennert, L., & Lynch, K. G. (2013) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.2013.74.642 · Cited by 13
Li, R.-B., Guan, D.-W., Zhu, B.-L., Zhang, G.-H., & Zhao, R. (2009) · Legal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.02.028 · Cited by 13
Cook, J., Lloyd-Jones, M., Arunogiri, S., Ogden, E., & Bonomo, Y. (2017) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867417714878 · Cited by 13
Systematic review on use of health incentives in U.S. to change maternal health behavior
Washio, Y., Atreyapurapu, S., Hayashi, Y., Taylor, S., Chang, K., Ma, T., & Isaacs, K. (2021) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106442 · Cited by 13
Stimulant Use Disorders in the United States—Is Another Epidemic on The Horizon?
Das, L. T., & Kutscher, E. (2020) · JAMA Health Forum · doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.1486 · Cited by 11
Margolin, A., Avants, S. K., Malison, R. T., & Kosten, T. R. (1997) · Substance Abuse · doi:10.1080/08897079709511358 · Cited by 11
Methylphenidate vs. resperidone in treatment of methamphetamine dependence: A clinical trial
Solhi, H., Jamilian, H. R., Kazemifar, A. M., Javaheri, J., & Rasti Barzaki, A. (2014) · Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2013.04.003 · Cited by 10
Stimulant and Designer Drug Use: Primary Care Management.
Klega, A. E., & Keehbauch, J. (2018) · PubMed · Cited by 10
A pilot randomized trial of CBT4CBT for women in residential treatment for substance use disorders
Kelpin, S. S., Parlier-Ahmad, A. B., Jallo, N., Carroll, K., & Svikis, D. S. (2022) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108622 · Cited by 10
Digital Contingency Management in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders
Dallery, J., DeFulio, A., & Raiff, B. R. (2023) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/23727322221144648 · Cited by 10
Shin, D., Lee, E. S., Bohra, C., & Kongpakpaisarn, K. (2019) · Cardiology Research · doi:10.14740/cr831 · Cited by 9
Gerdtz, M., Yap, C. Y. L., Daniel, C., Knott, J. C., Kelly, P., Innes, A., & Braitberg, G. (2020) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.12710 · Cited by 9
(1993) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/0020-7292(93)90164-r · Cited by 9
Cognitive deficits in people with stimulant use disorders
Verdejo-Garcia, A., & Rubenis, A. J. (2020) · Cognition and Addiction · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815298-0.00011-3 · Cited by 9
Effect of continuing care for people with cocaine dependence on criminal justice sentences
Wimberly, A. S., Hyatt, J. M., & McKay, J. R. (2018) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.2330 · Cited by 8
Lopez-Vergara, H. I., Zapolski, T. C. B., & Leventhal, A. M. (2021) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000522 · Cited by 8
Minařík, J., Gabrhelík, R., Malcolm, R., Pavlovská, A., & Miller, P. (2016) · Journal of Substance Use · doi:10.3109/14659891.2015.1045047 · Cited by 8
Mohtasham‐Amiri, Z., Mirzaee, B., & Sabet, M. S. (2016) · International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences · Cited by 7
Epidemiology of Human Trafficking
Moukaddam, N., Torres, M., Vujanovic, A. A., Saunders, J., Le, H., & Shah, A. A. (2021) · Psychiatric Annals · doi:10.3928/00485713-20210702-02 · Cited by 7
Perry, E. B., Gil, R. B., Miles, D., Brenner, L. M., Macdougall, L., Johnson, R., Degen, K. C., Gueorguieva, R. V., Petrakis, I. L., Krystal, J. H., et al. (2005) · Journal of Dual Diagnosis · doi:10.1300/j374v01n01_04 · Cited by 7
Patient Reactance Moderates the Effect of Directive Telephone Counseling for Methamphetamine Users
Karno, M., Farabee, D., Brecht, M.-L., & Rawson, R. (2012) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.2012.73.844 · Cited by 5
Cui, R., Tate, S. R., Cummins, K., Skidmore, J. R., & Brown, S. A. (2015) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.3109/10826084.2014.962052 · Cited by 5
Cocaine-Induced Coronary-Artery Vasospasm
Almaddah, N., & Ajayi, T. O. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmicm1503339 · Cited by 5
Walker, R., Northrup, T. F., Tillitski, J., Bernstein, I., Greer, T. L., & Trivedi, M. H. (2019) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2018.1467453 · Cited by 5
The Prevalence of Cocaine Use in Homeless Populations: A Systematic Review
Perez, G. R., Ustyol, A., Mills, K. J., Raitt, J. M., & North, C. S. (2022) · Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s40501-022-00271-5 · Cited by 5
Gibson, L. P., Kramer, E. B., Wrigley, J., Probst, M., & Bryan, A. D. (2023) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2023.2236180 · Cited by 5
Addiction and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Issues
Lee, S. J. (2015) · Textbook of Addiction Treatment: International Perspectives · doi:10.1007/978-88-470-5322-9_98 · Cited by 5
Dexamphetamine substitute‐prescribing in pregnancy: a 10‐year retrospective audit
White, R., Thompson, M., Windsor, D., Walsh, M., Cox, D., & Charnaud, B. (2006) · Journal of Substance Use · doi:10.1080/14659890600594112 · Cited by 5
Hodgkin, D., Gao, W., Larson, M. J., Drebing, C. E., Merrick, E. L., Pugatch, M., Horgan, C. M., Zolotusky, G., Petry, N. M., & Saitz, R. (2020) · Journal of Addiction Medicine · doi:10.1097/adm.0000000000000567 · Cited by 4
The Cocaine 'Body Packer' Syndrome: Diagnosis and Treatment
McCarron, M. M. (1983) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1983.03340110031027 · Cited by 4
Drugs Implicated In Seizures and Its Management
Vaidya, P. H. (2017) · Journal of pharmacology & clinical research · doi:10.19080/jpcr.2017.03.555607 · Cited by 3
Coercion in Substance Use: A Systematic Review
Mathew, S. R. (2021) · Open Access Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.38125/oajbs.000297 · Cited by 3
Slisz, K. (2020) · Indiana Magazine of History (Indiana University) · Cited by 2
Rujescu, D., Röttig, S., & Krause, T. J. (2020) · NeuroPsychopharmacotherapy · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56015-1_83-1 · Cited by 2
Sateia, M., Buysse, D., Krystal, A., Neubauer, D., & Heald, J. (2017) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleepj/zsx050.394
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 2008, Community reinforcement approach (CRA) for cocaine addicts: establishment in a public health setting, An Psiquiatr, 24, 153
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gandhi, R. T., Landovitz, R. J., Sax, P. E., Smith, D. M., Springer, S. A., Günthard, H. F., Thompson, M. A., Bedimo, R. J., Benson, C. A., Buchbinder, S. P., et al. (2025) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2024.24543 · Cited by 265
Methamphetamine Toxicities and Clinical Management
Coffin, P. O., & Suen, L. W. (2023) · NEJM Evidence · doi:10.1056/evidra2300160 · Cited by 36
Khazanov, G. K., McKay, J. R., & Rawson, R. A. (2024) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.16497 · Cited by 28
Ezard, N., Clifford, B., Siefried, K. J., Ali, R. L., Dunlop, A. J., McKetin, R., Bruno, R., Carr, A., Ward, J. S., Farrell, M., et al. (2024) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.16730 · Cited by 16
“Experienced specialist clinicians could consider off-label prescription of lisdexamfetamine 250 mg with close monitoring of risks and benefits, in line with current guidelines for prescription psychostimulants for methamphet-amine use disorder [48].”
Khalili, M., Sadeghirad, B., Bach, P., Crabtree, A., Javadi, S., Sadeghi, E., Moradi, S., Fashami, F. M., Nakhaeizadeh, M., Salehi, S., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-024-01379-w · Cited by 15
“The guideline also, recommended contingency management (CM) should be a primary component of the treat-ment plan in conjunction with other psychosocial interventions (Batki et al., 2024).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members, ASAM Team, AAAP Team, & IRETA Team
- Venue
- Journal of Addiction Medicine
- Published
- 2024-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1S
- Pages
- 1-56
- ISSN
- 1932-0620 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11105801
- OpenAlex
- W4395662991
- Semantic Scholar
- cd1e51834dca369fd36be38b3c82bfc6fb60b85f
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 316
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 13
- FWCI
- 23.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal of Addiction Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (HHSN271201600056C, HHSN271201700032C, R01DA054190)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Keywords
- stimulant use disorder, stimulant intoxication, stimulant withdrawal, contingency management, pharmacotherapy, off-label drug use, harm reduction, secondary prevention, tertiary prevention, addiction treatment, treatment guidelines, evidence-based practice, American Society of Addiction Medicine, American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry
- MeSH terms
- Central Nervous System Stimulants, Humans, Substance-Related Disorders, Amphetamine-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review