Cited by 2,527Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational and Psychological Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory

Paas, Fred, Tuovinen, Juhani E., Tabbers, Huib, Van Gerven, Pascal W. M.·2003·Educational Psychologist

Abstract

In this article, we discuss cognitive load measurement techniques with regard to their contribu-tion to cognitive load theory (CLT). CLT is concerned with the design of instructional methods that efficiently use people’s limited cognitive processing capacity to apply acquired knowledge and skills to new situations (i.e., transfer). CLT is based on a cognitive architecture that consists of a limited working memory with partly independent processing units for visual and auditory information, which interacts with an unlimited long-term memory. These structures and func-tions of human cognitive architecture have been used to design a variety of novel efficient in-structional methods. The associated research has shown that measures of cognitive load can re-veal important information for CLT that is not necessarily reflected by traditional performance-based measures. Particularly, the combination of performance and cognitive load measures has been identified to constitute a reliable estimate of the mental efficiency of instruc-tional methods. The discussion of previously used cognitive load measurement techniques and their role in the advancement of CLT is followed by a discussion of aspects of CLT that may benefit by measurement of cognitive load. Within the cognitive load framework, we also discuss some promising new techniques.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15326985ep3801_8

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M.
Affiliations
  • Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
  • Charles Sturt University (AU)
Venue
Educational Psychologist
Published
2003-01-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
63-71
ISSN
  • 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6985
OpenAlex
W1980877068
Cited by
2,527
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 149 · 2025: 142 · 2024: 155 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 174 · 2021: 164 · 2020: 156 · 2019: 143 · 2018: 138 · 2017: 135 · 2016: 114 · 2015: 133 · 2014: 120 · 2013: 110 · 2012: 96
FWCI
47.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Educational Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
Keywords
cognitive load assessment, cognitive load theory, working memory, long-term memory, transfer of learning, instructional design, performance-based measures, cognitive architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review