Cited by 2,385

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL

Woolrich, Mark W., Jbabdi, Saad, Patenaude, Brian, Chappell, Michael, Makni, Salima, Behrens, Timothy, Beckmann, Christian, Jenkinson, Mark, Smith, Stephen M.·2009·NeuroImage

Abstract

Typically in neuroimaging we are looking to extract some pertinent information from imperfect, noisy images of the brain. This might be the inference of percent changes in blood flow in perfusion FMRI data, segmentation of subcortical structures from structural MRI, or inference of the probability of an anatomical connection between an area of cortex and a subthalamic nucleus using diffusion MRI. In this article we will describe how Bayesian techniques have made a significant impact in tackling problems such as these, particularly in regards to the analysis tools in the FMRIB Software Library (FSL). We shall see how Bayes provides a framework within which we can attempt to infer on models of neuroimaging data, while allowing us to incorporate our prior belief about the brain and the neuroimaging equipment in the form of biophysically informed or regularising priors. It allows us to extract probabilistic information from the data, and to probabilistically combine information from multiple modalities. Bayes can also be used to not only compare and select between models of different complexity, but also to infer on data using committees of models. Finally, we mention some analysis scenarios where Bayesian methods are impractical, and briefly discuss some practical approaches that we have taken in these cases.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.055

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Attias, 2000, A Variational Bayesian framework for graphical models, Adv. Neur. Info. Proc. Sys., 12
  2. Bartsch, 2006, Diagnostic functional MRI: illustrated clinical applications and decision-making, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 23, 921, 10.1002/jmri.20579 · DOI
  3. Beckmann, 2005, Tensorial extensions of independent component analysis for multisubject FMRI analysis, Neuroimage, 25, 294, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.043 · DOI
  4. Beckmann, 2004, Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging, IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 23, 137, 10.1109/TMI.2003.822821 · DOI
  5. Behrens, 2003, Characterisation and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion weighted MR imaging, Magn. Reson. Med., 50, 1077, 10.1002/mrm.10609 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Behrens, 2007, Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: what can we gain?, Neuroimage, 34, 144, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.018 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chappell, M., Grove, A., Whitcher, B., and Woolrich, M. (2008). Variational Bayesian inference for a non-linear forward model. IEEE Sig Proc. In Submission.
  8. Cox, 1946, Probability, frequency and reasonable expectation, Am. J. Phys., 14, 1, 10.1119/1.1990764 · DOI
  9. Friston, 2007, Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation, Neuroimage, 34, 220, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.035 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Green, 1995, Reversible jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination, Biometrika, 82, 711, 10.1093/biomet/82.4.711 · DOI
  11. Jbabdi, 2007, A Bayesian framework for global tractography, Neuroimage, 37, 116, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.039 · DOI
  12. Jenkinson, 2003, A fast, automated, n-dimensional phase unwrapping algorithm, Magn. Reson. Med., 49, 193, 10.1002/mrm.10354 · DOI
  13. Jenkinson, 2001, A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images, Med. Image Anal., 5, 143, 10.1016/S1361-8415(01)00036-6 · DOI
  14. Makni, 2008, Bayesian deconvolution of fMRI data using bilinear dynamical system, NeuroImage, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.052 · DOI
  15. Makni, S., Beckmann, C., Smith, S., and Woolrich, M. (2008b). Combining ICA and GLM for fMRI data analysis. In Fourteenth Int. Conf. on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain.
  16. Patenaude, B., Smith, S., Kennedy, D., and Jenkinson, M. (2007). FIRST — FMRIB's integrated registration and segmentation tool. In Thirteenth Int. Conf. on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain.
  17. Penny, 2003, Variational Bayesian inference for fMRI time series, NeuroImage, 19, 1477, 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00071-5 · DOI
  18. Penny, 2004, Comparing dynamic causal models, Neuroimage, 22, 1157, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.026 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Smith, 2002, Fast robust automated brain extraction, Hum. Brain Mapp., 17, 143, 10.1002/hbm.10062 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Smith, 2006, Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data, Neuroimage, 31, 1487, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 · DOI
  21. Woolrich, 2006, Variational bayes inference of spatial mixture models for segmentation, IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 25, 1380, 10.1109/TMI.2006.880682 · DOI
  22. Woolrich, 2004, Multi-level linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference, NeuroImage, 21, 1732, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.023 · DOI
  23. Woolrich, 2004, Constrained linear basis sets for HRF modelling using Variational Bayes, NeuroImage, 21, 1748, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.024 · DOI
  24. Woolrich, 2005, Mixture models with adaptive spatial regularisation for segmentation with an application to FMRI data, IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 24, 1, 10.1109/TMI.2004.836545 · DOI
  25. Woolrich, 2006, Bayesian inference of haemodynamic changes in functional ASL data, Magn. Reson. Med., 56, 891, 10.1002/mrm.21039 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Woolrich, M. W., Jbabdi, S., Patenaude, B., Chappell, M., Makni, S., Behrens, T., Beckmann, C., Jenkinson, M., & Smith, S. M.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
S173-S186
ISSN
1053-8119
Cited by
2,385
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review