CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 638Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Executive Functioning, Temporal Discounting, and Sense of Time in Adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD)

Barkley, Russell A., Edwards, Gwenyth, Laneri, Margaret, Fletcher, Kenneth, Metevia, Lori·2001·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
DOI 10.1023/a:1012233310098
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Clinic-referred teens (ages 12-19) with ADHD and ODD (N = 101) were compared to community control (CC) teens, equated for age and sex, (N = 39) on a variety of psychological tasks assessing executive functioning (EF), temporal reward discounting, and time estimation and reproduction. A factor analysis reduced the EF measures to three dimensions, representing CPF Inattention, Working Memory, and CPT Inhibition. Results indicated that the ADHD group had significantly more CPT Inattention than the CC group. No differences were found for Working Memory or CPT Inhibition. The ADHD group displayed significantly greater temporal discounting of delayed hypothetical monetary rewards relative to immediate ones and manifested more impaired time reproduction, but not time estimation, than did the CC group. Main effects for level of IQ were found only on the Working Memory factor and largely did not interact with the group factor otherwise. The group differences in CPT Inattention, temporal discounting, and time reproduction were not a function of level of comorbid oppositional defiant disorder, delinquency, or anxiety-depression. Results are reasonably consistent with past research on EF and sense of time in children with ADHD and extend these findings to the adolescent age group. Problems with working memory and CPT inhibition found in prior studies of children with ADHD, however, were not evident here, perhaps owing to age-related improvements or insufficient task difficulty.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1012233310098

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: Author.
  2. Benton, A. L., & de Hamsher, K. (1978). Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City: University of Iowa.
  3. Conners, C. K. (1993). The Conners ContinuousPerformance Test. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
  4. Dooling-Litfin, J. (1997). Time perception in children with ADHD. The ADHD Report, 5(5), 13–16.
  5. Kaufman, A., & Kaufman, N. (1993). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  6. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford University Press.
  7. Rapport, M. D., & Kelly, K. L. (1993). Psychostimulant effects on learning and cognitive performance. In J. L. Matson (Ed.), Handbook of hyperactivity in children (pp. 97–136). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  8. Wechlser, D. (1994). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III (3rd ed.). Odessa, TX: Psychological Corp.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Barkley, R. A., Edwards, G., Laneri, M., Fletcher, K., & Metevia, L.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Barkley, Russell A.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2001-12
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
541-556
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
DOI
10.1023/a:1012233310098
OpenAlex
W1875653175
Cited by
638
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 43
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh041583-06)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH41583)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
executive function, delay discounting, time perception, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, adolescents, time reproduction, time estimation, inattention, working memory, inhibition, comorbidities, IQ
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Motivation, Neuropsychological Tests, Mental Recall, Time Perception, Verbal Learning, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review