Cited by 1,439Gut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disordersInflammatory Bowel Disease

Metabolite-sensing receptors GPR43 and GPR109A facilitate dietary fibre-induced gut homeostasis through regulation of the inflammasome

Open access
Macia, Laurence, Tan, Jian, Vieira, Angelica T., Leach, Katie, Stanley, Dragana, Luong, Suzanne, Maruya, Mikako, Ian McKenzie, Craig +14 more·2015·Nature Communications

Abstract

Diet and the gut microbiota may underpin numerous human diseases. A major metabolic product of commensal bacteria are short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that derive from fermentation of dietary fibre. Here we show that diets deficient or low in fibre exacerbate colitis development, while very high intake of dietary fibre or the SCFA acetate protects against colitis. SCFAs binding to the ‘metabolite-sensing’ receptors GPR43 and GPR109A in non-haematopoietic cells mediate these protective effects. The inflammasome pathway has hitherto been reported as a principal pathway promoting gut epithelial integrity. SCFAs binding to GPR43 on colonic epithelial cells stimulates K+ efflux and hyperpolarization, which lead to NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Dietary fibre also shapes gut bacterial ecology, resulting in bacterial species that are more effective for inflammasome activation. SCFAs and metabolite receptors thus explain health benefits of dietary fibre, and how metabolite signals feed through to a major pathway for gut homeostasis. Dietary fibre is metabolized into short-chain fatty acids by gut bacteria. Here the authors show that these metabolites activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in gut epithelial cells and protect mice from injury-induced colitis, suggesting a mechanism for the benefits of a high-fibre diet.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms7734

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macia, L., Tan, J., Vieira, A. T., Leach, K., Stanley, D., Luong, S., Maruya, M., Ian McKenzie, C., Hijikata, A., Wong, C., Binge, L., Thorburn, A. N., Chevalier, N., Ang, C., Marino, E., Robert, R., Offermanns, S., Teixeira, M. M., Moore, R. J., Flavell, R. A., Fagarasan, S., & Mackay, C. R.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • RIKEN (JP)
  • Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research (DE)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Mackay, Charles R.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2015-04-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
6734-6734
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078455937
Cited by
1,439
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 132 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 157 · 2023: 150 · 2022: 183 · 2021: 203 · 2020: 125 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 15
FWCI
33.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • RIKEN
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
dietary fiber, short-chain fatty acids, GPR43, GPR109A, NLRP3 inflammasome, colitis, intestinal homeostasis, gut microbiota, acetate, colonic epithelial cells, potassium efflux, hyperpolarization, high-fiber diet, intestinal barrier integrity
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein, Acetates, Animals, Butyrates, Carrier Proteins, Colitis, Colon, Dietary Fiber, Fatty Acids, Volatile, Fermentation, Homeostasis, Receptors, Nicotinic, Mice, Knockout, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Mice, Inflammasomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review