Cited by 3,395Protein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 254 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 10 of the 253 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue

Open access
Békés, Miklós, Langley, David R., Crews, Craig M.·2022·Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Abstract

Targeted protein degradation (TPD) is an emerging therapeutic modality with the potential to tackle disease-causing proteins that have historically been highly challenging to target with conventional small molecules. In the 20 years since the concept of a proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) molecule harnessing the ubiquitin–proteasome system to degrade a target protein was reported, TPD has moved from academia to industry, where numerous companies have disclosed programmes in preclinical and early clinical development. With clinical proof-of-concept for PROTAC molecules against two well-established cancer targets provided in 2020, the field is poised to pursue targets that were previously considered ‘undruggable’. In this Review, we summarize the first two decades of PROTAC discovery and assess the current landscape, with a focus on industry activity. We then discuss key areas for the future of TPD, including establishing the target classes for which TPD is most suitable, expanding the use of ubiquitin ligases to enable precision medicine and extending the modality beyond oncology. Targeted protein degradation with proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) has the potential to tackle disease-causing proteins that have historically been highly challenging to target with conventional small molecules. This article summarizes the first two decades of PROTAC discovery and discusses key areas for the future of this therapeutic modality, including establishing the target classes for which it is most suitable and extending its application beyond oncology.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review summarizes 20 years of PROTAC targeted protein degradation, from the first small-molecule PROTAC in 2001 to clinical proof-of-concept in 2020 and a growing industry pipeline. It argues that TPD is poised to expand beyond oncology, to new E3 ligases, and to previously undrugged targets.

Key findings

  • The first fully synthetic PROTAC, Protac-1, was reported in 2001 and targeted METAP2 via β-TRCP; the field then moved from peptide-based bioPROTACs to fully synthetic small molecules, with the first heterobifunctional degraders ARV-110 and ARV-471 entering phase I trials in 2019.
  • In 2020, ARV-110 (AR degrader) was well tolerated up to 420 mg, showed target degradation in tumours and early antitumour activity, and began phase II ARDENT in October 2020 at 420 mg; ARV-471 (ER degrader) showed a manageable tolerability profile and a 42% clinical benefit rate in a heavily pretreated population, with better ER degradation than fulvestrant and other clinical-stage SERDs at the same stage.
  • By the end of 2021, at least 15 targeted protein degraders had entered the clinic, including heterobifunctional PROTACs and molecular glues; most early clinical PROTACs recruit CRBN, with DT2216 as a notable VHL-recruiting exception.
  • The review identifies future inflection points: defining target classes best served by degradation over inhibition, expanding the E3 ligase landscape beyond CRBN/VHL (with more than 600 human E3 ligases), extending TPD beyond oncology, and validating modalities beyond IMiDs and PROTACs.

Methods

  • Narrative review, not a systematic review, synthesizing the first two decades of PROTAC/TPD discovery and the current clinical landscape with a focus on industry activity.
  • Data sources are published literature, clinical trial registries/company disclosures, and tables of clinical-stage heterobifunctional PROTACs and molecular glues (Tables 1 and 2).
  • Main analysis is qualitative synthesis of mechanism, target selection, E3 ligase biology, clinical proof-of-concept, and future directions; no meta-analysis or primary experimental data are reported.

Limitations

  • The paper does not state a formal limitations section. Evident from the text: it is a narrative review without a systematic search strategy or quantitative synthesis.
  • Clinical data cited are early/interim phase I/II results and rapidly evolving; several compounds in Table 1 have undisclosed E3 ligases or are only in IND-enabling studies, limiting conclusions about the full clinical landscape.
  • The future outlook is explicitly author-perspective (“in our opinion”), so forward-looking statements are not evidence-based predictions.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41573-021-00371-6

Cites

254 of 254 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

134 Not checked yet · 58 Own interpretation · 25 No basis given · 4 Partly supported · 1 Supported · 1 Supported so far · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 243 references — free account

Show all 126 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 58
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 48
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
97 of 97
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many disease-causing proteins are difficult to target with conventional small molecules because their active sites are broad, shallow pockets or their surfaces are smooth with few binding sites.

    “Some have been intractable because their active sites are broad, shallow pockets that are difficult to bridge with small molecules; others have ‘smooth’ surfaces that offer few sites for a small molecule to bind.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    For any new therapeutic modality, selecting well-known targets is important for establishing proof of concept because it introduces just one variable (the modality), not two.

    “For any new therapeutic modality, the selection of well-known targets is important for establishing proof of concept because it introduces just one variable (the modality), not two (the modality and a novel target) into the equation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Moderate affinity (≥1–500 nM) is typically needed for a ligand to be used in a PROTAC.

    “Using these sites does not require a high-affinity ligand if coupled to the right E3 ligand, but moderate affinity (≥1–500 nM) is typically needed”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Access to the POI surface near the binding site by a recruited E3 ligase is essential.

    “and access to the POI surface near the binding site by a recruited E3 ligase is essential.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    An ideal E3 ligase ligand would be a potent binder with a slow off-rate.

    “an ideal E3 ligase ligand would be a potent binder with a slow off-rate.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Short linkers limit the number of ways the E3 ligase and POI come together and how the POI fits into the full E3–E2–ubiquitin complex.

    “However, short linkers limit the number of ways the E3 ligase and POI come together and, ultimately, how the POI fits into the full E3–E2–ubiquitin complex.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Ternary complex formation is a necessary step in the action of a PROTAC molecule.

    “Ternary complex formation is a necessary step in the action of a PROTAC molecule”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Several ligases exist in an off state and are auto-inhibited in the absence of an activating post-translational modification or presence of a binding partner.

    “Several ligases exist in an ‘off’ state and are auto-inhibited in the absence of an activating post-translational modification or presence of a binding partner.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    TPD has the potential to degrade any target of choice.

    “given its potential to degrade any target of choice”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some MAGE E3 ligases do not degrade their targets.

    “as some do not degrade their targets”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are currently no approved IRAK4-targeting therapies.

    “By contrast, there are currently no approved IRAK4-targeting therapies”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    HPK1 inhibitors are equally effective as HPK1-targeting PROTACs.

    “although HPK1 inhibitors were shown to be equally effective”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Transcription factors and RNA-binding proteins have largely remained undrugged because many lack ligand-binding sites.

    “Despite much effort, these POIs have largely remained undrugged as many of them lack ligand-binding sites.”
13 of 13

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 254 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Snyder, L. B. et al. Discovery of ARV-110, a first in class androgen receptor degrading PROTAC for the treatment of men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. In Proc. 112th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 1115 (AACR, 2021).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3,395

Metadata

Authors
Békés, M., Langley, D. R., & Crews, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Arvinas (United States) (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Békés, Miklós
  • Langley, David R.
  • Crews, Craig M.
Venue
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Published
2022-01-18
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
181-200
ISSN
  • 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1784
OpenAlex
W4205379795
Cited by
3,395
References
254
Citations by year
2026: 841 · 2025: 965 · 2024: 798 · 2023: 550 · 2022: 240
FWCI
67.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R35CA197589)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
PROTACs, targeted protein degradation, ubiquitin-proteasome system, ubiquitin ligase, undruggable targets, cancer therapeutics, precision medicine, drug discovery, pharmaceutical industry development
MeSH terms
Humans, Proteins, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review