Cited by 173Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 232 of the 232 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developmental mechanisms underlying the evolution of human cortical circuits

Open access
Vanderhaeghen, Pierre, Polleux, Franck·2023·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

The brain of modern humans has evolved remarkable computational abilities that enable higher cognitive functions. These capacities are tightly linked to an increase in the size and connectivity of the cerebral cortex, which is thought to have resulted from evolutionary changes in the mechanisms of cortical development. Convergent progress in evolutionary genomics, developmental biology and neuroscience has recently enabled the identification of genomic changes that act as human-specific modifiers of cortical development. These modifiers influence most aspects of corticogenesis, from the timing and complexity of cortical neurogenesis to synaptogenesis and the assembly of cortical circuits. Mutations of human-specific genetic modifiers of corticogenesis have started to be linked to neurodevelopmental disorders, providing evidence for their physiological relevance and suggesting potential relationships between the evolution of the human brain and its sensitivity to specific diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41583-023-00675-z

Cites

232 of 232 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Vanderhaeghen, P., & Polleux, F.
Affiliations
  • VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research (BE)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Vanderhaeghen, Pierre
  • Polleux, Franck
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2023-02-15
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
213-232
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W4320913079
Cited by
173
References
231
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 24
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • AXA Research Fund
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • NOMIS Stiftung
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS067557, RO1NS067557, R35NS127232)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
human brain evolution, cortical development, neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, cortical circuits, neurodevelopmental disorders, higher cognition
MeSH terms
Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review