Cited by 390Sleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

The association between sleep duration and weight gain in adults: A 6-year prospective study from the Quebec Family Study

Open access
Chaput, Jean-Philippe, Després, Jean-Pierre, Bouchard, Claude, Tremblay, Angelo·2008·Sleep

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between sleep duration and subsequent body weight and fat gain. DESIGN: Six-year longitudinal study. SETTING: Community setting. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred seventy-six adults aged 21 to 64 years from the Quebec Family Study. More than half of the sample is drawn from families with at least 1 parent and 1 offspring with a body mass index of 32 kg/m2 or higher. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Body composition measurements and self-reported sleep duration were determined. Changes in adiposity indices were compared between short- (5-6 hours), average- (7-8 hours), and long- (9-10 hours) duration sleeper groups. After adjustment for age, sex, and baseline body mass index, short-duration sleepers gained 1.98 kg (95% confidence interval: 1.16-2.82) more and long-duration sleepers gained 1.58 kg (95% CI: 1.02-2.56) more than did average-duration sleepers over 6 years. Short- and long-duration sleepers were 35% and 25% more likely to experience a 5-kg weight gain, respectively, as compared with average-duration sleepers over 6 years. The risk of developing obesity was elevated for short- and long-duration sleepers as compared with average-duration sleepers, with 27% and 21% increases in risk, respectively. These associations remained significant after inclusion of important covariates and were not affected by adjustment for energy intake and physical activity participation. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that both short and long sleeping times predict an increased risk of future body weight and fat gain in adults. Hence, these results emphasize the need to add sleep duration to the panel of determinants that contribute to weight gain and obesity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/31.4.517

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analyses indicate that improving sleep duration and quality reduces obesity risk and supports long-term weight maintenance.

    “Meta-analyses indicate that improving sleep duration and quality reduces obesity risk and supports long-term weight maintenance [109].”

    From Obesity: Clinical Impact, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Modern Innovations in Therapeutic Strategies (2025) · cites this paper as [109]

    The Abstract reports that, in this six-year observational study, adults with short or long sleep duration had greater weight gain and obesity risk than average-duration sleepers. It does not report a meta-analysis or show that improving sleep duration or quality reduces obesity risk or supports long-term weight maintenance. Sleep quality is mentioned only as a possible explanation for self-reported long sleep time. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the Québec Family Study, over 6 years, habitual short sleepers were more likely to gain weight and have increased waist circumference and percent body fat compared with normal-duration sleepers, with a U-shaped relationship for long sleepers.

    “These findings were replicated and extended with data from the Québec Family Study showing that over the course of 6 years, habitual short sleepers were more likely to gain weight and to have increased waist circumference and percent body fat compared with normal-duration sleepers. Notably, there was a U-shaped relationship in which a similar pattern was seen for habitual long sleepers.”
  • In a 6-year longitudinal study of 276 adults, short sleepers (5-6 h/night) gained 1.98 kg more and long sleepers (9-10 h/night) gained 1.58 kg more weight than reference (7-8 h/night) over 6 years.

    “Short sleepers gained 1.98 kg more and long sleepers gained 1.58 kg more weight than reference over 6 years of followup.”
  • In studies where the association is present, the size of this effect is rather modest, with ~2 kg greater weight gain noted across a 6-year period in Canadian adults and 0.7-1.14 kg greater weight gain across a 16-year period noted in those with short sleep (≤5-6 h/night) in the Nurses' Health Study.

    “Furthermore, in studies where the association is present, the size of this effect is rather modest, with ~2 kg greater weight gain noted across a 6-year period in Canadian adults 86 and 0.7-1.14kg greater weight gain across a 16-year period noted in those with short sleep (≤5-6 h/night) in the Nurses' Health Study.92”
  • Several longitudinal studies demonstrate that short sleep duration is associated with increased weight gain over time.

    “several other studies have longitudinally examined this relationship, demonstrating that short sleep duration is associated with increased weight gain over time.42–46”

    From Sleep, Health, and Society (2017) · cites this paper as [44]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [12]12. Chokroverty S. Sleep Disorders Medicine: Basic Science, Tech- 39. nical Considerations, and Clinical Aspects, 2nd ed. Boston: But- terworth and Heinemann; 1999:14-16.
  2. [21]21. Bouchard C. Genetic and body fat content. Prog Obes Res 16. 1996;5:33-41.
  3. [22]22. The Airlie (VA) Consensus Conference. Standardization of an- 17. thropometric measurements. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1988.
  4. [24]24. Meneely GR, Kaltreider NL. Volume of the lung determined by 19. helium dilution. J Clin Invest 1949;28:129-139.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaput, J.-P., Després, J.-P., Bouchard, C., & Tremblay, A.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Tremblay, Angelo
Venue
Sleep
Published
2008-04
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
517-523
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2113211629
Cited by
390
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 34
FWCI
35.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Dairy Management
  • Université Laval
  • Dairy Farmers of Canada
  • Pfizer Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
sleep duration, weight gain, obesity risk, fat gain, body composition, short sleepers, long sleepers, adults, Quebec Family Study
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Energy Intake, Energy Metabolism, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Prospective Studies, Sleep, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Weight Gain, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review