CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,755Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Research TopicsPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Development and Well‐Being Assessment: Description and Initial Validation of an Integrated Assessment of Child and Adolescent Psychopathology

Goodman, Robert, Ford, Tamsin, Richards, Hilary, Gatward, Rebecca, Meltzer, Howard·2000·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2000.tb02345.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) is a novel package of questionnaires, interviews, and rating techniques designed to generate ICD-10 and DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses on 5-16-year-olds. Nonclinical interviewers administer a structured interview to parents about psychiatric symptoms and resultant impact. When definite symptoms are identified by the structured questions, interviewers use open-ended questions and supplementary prompts to get parents to describe the problems in their own words. These descriptions are transcribed verbatim by the interviewers but are not rated by them. A similar interview is administered to 11-16-year-olds. Teachers complete a brief questionnaire covering the main conduct, emotional, and hyperactivity symptoms and any resultant impairment. The different sorts of information are brought together by a computer program that also predicts likely diagnoses. These computer-generated summary sheets and diagnoses form a convenient starting point for experienced clinical raters, who decide whether to accept or overturn the computer diagnosis (or lack of diagnosis) in the light of their review of all the data, including transcripts. In the present study, the DAWBA was administered to community (N = 491) and clinic (N = 39) samples. There was excellent discrimination between community and clinic samples in rates of diagnosed disorder. Within the community sample, subjects with and without diagnosed disorders differed markedly in external chara…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2000.tb02345.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1097/00004583-199902000-00011 · DOI
  2. 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800360068010 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/00004583-199009000-00020 · DOI
  4. 10.1377/hlthaff.14.3.147 · DOI
  5. 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830120067012 · DOI
  6. 10.2307/1403001 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01282.x · DOI
  8. 10.1111/1469-7610.00494 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01418.x · DOI
  10. 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950130061007 · DOI
  11. 10.1037/e622732007-001 · DOI
  12. Meltzer H., 1995, OPCS surveys of psychiatric morbidity in Great Britain, Report 1. The prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among adults living in private households
  13. 10.1017/S0033291700013362 · DOI
  14. 10.1192/bjp.126.6.493 · DOI
  15. 10.1176/ajp.151.7.1048 · DOI
  16. 10.1097/00004583-199607000-00013 · DOI
  17. 10.1097/00004583-199607000-00012 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830210039004 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Tanur J. M., 1992, Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys
  20. Taylor E., 1991, The epidemiology of childhood hyperactivity. Institute of Psychiatry: Maudsley Monographs, 33
  21. World Health Organisation., 1994, The ICD‐I0 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goodman, R., Ford, T., Richards, H., Gatward, R., & Meltzer, H.
Affiliations
Office for National Statistics (GB)
Corresponding author
Goodman, Robert
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-07
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
645-655
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
DOI
10.1111/j.1469-7610.2000.tb02345.x
OpenAlex
W2156177125
Cited by
1,755
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 131 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 106 · 2018: 101 · 2017: 108 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 80
FWCI
9.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 2919 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Development and Well-Being Assessment, child psychopathology, adolescent psychopathology, psychiatric diagnosis, parent interviews, diagnostic agreement, comorbidities, screening questions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Child, Preschool, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interview, Psychological, London, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sampling Studies, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review