Cited by 462Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesPomegranate: compositions and health benefitsNutritional Studies and Diet

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 117 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Berries: emerging impact on cardiovascular health

Open access
Basu, Arpita, Rhone, Michael, Lyons, Timothy J·2010·Nutrition Reviews

Abstract

Berries are a good source of polyphenols, especially anthocyanins, micronutrients, and fiber. In epidemiological and clinical studies, these constituents have been associated with improved cardiovascular risk profiles. Human intervention studies using chokeberries, cranberries, blueberries, and strawberries (either fresh, or as juice, or freeze-dried), or purified anthocyanin extracts have demonstrated significant improvements in LDL oxidation, lipid peroxidation, total plasma antioxidant capacity, dyslipidemia, and glucose metabolism. Benefits were seen in healthy subjects and in those with existing metabolic risk factors. Underlying mechanisms for these beneficial effects are believed to include upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, decreased activities of carbohydrate digestive enzymes, decreased oxidative stress, and inhibition of inflammatory gene expression and foam cell formation. Though limited, these data support the recommendation of berries as an essential fruit group in a heart-healthy diet.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Berries are rich in polyphenols, especially anthocyanins, and epidemiological and clinical evidence links their intake to improved cardiovascular risk factors such as LDL oxidation, lipid peroxidation, dyslipidemia, and glucose metabolism. The review concludes that berries may be recommended as part of a heart-healthy diet, but calls for more rigorous prospective studies with hard cardiovascular endpoints.

Key findings

  • In the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study, 1,950 men in the highest quartile of berry intake (>408 g/day) had significantly lower risk of CVD-related deaths than men with the lowest intake (<133 g/day) during a mean follow-up of 12.8 years.
  • In the Iowa Women’s Health Study (n = 34,489 postmenopausal women, 16-year follow-up), strawberry intake was associated with significantly reduced CVD mortality; a mean anthocyanin intake of 0.2 mg/day was also associated with significantly reduced CVD mortality.
  • Of 20 intervention trials reviewed, 9 involved postprandial measures and showed that berry consumption significantly decreased postprandial oxidative stress, especially lipid peroxidation; only 2 trials showed significant decreases in systolic blood pressure, and none showed significant effects on inflammatory biomarkers except a decrease in adhesion molecules after cranberry juice in healthy volunteers.
  • Proposed mechanisms include upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, decreased carbohydrate digestive enzyme activity, decreased oxidative stress, and inhibition of inflammatory gene expression and foam cell formation.

Methods

  • Narrative review of epidemiological observations, human intervention studies, and cellular/animal mechanistic studies on berries and cardiovascular health.
  • The review summarizes 20 human intervention trials using acai, black currants, bilberries, boysenberries, blueberries, chokeberries, cranberries, lingonberries, raspberries, strawberries, and wolfberries, either fresh, as juice, freeze-dried, or as purified anthocyanin extracts; trials ranged from 4 to 12 weeks.
  • Main analysis is a qualitative synthesis of reported outcomes, including plasma/urinary antioxidant capacity, LDL oxidation, lipid peroxidation, plasma glucose, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, blood pressure, and inflammatory biomarkers; no meta-analysis is reported.

Limitations

  • The paper states that epidemiological data are limited and conclusions need strengthening in future case-control or cohort studies investigating long-term health benefits of berries in specific populations.
  • The paper states that further rigorous, prospective studies are needed with large patient populations and outcomes including not only CVD biomarkers but also “hard” cardiovascular and metabolic endpoints, as well as comparative studies of whole berries versus purified anthocyanins and potential synergistic actions with other nutrients or medications.
  • Evident from the text: the review is narrative rather than systematic, most intervention trials were short (4–12 weeks) and biomarker-focused, and only 2 of 20 trials reported significant systolic blood pressure effects, limiting conclusions about clinical cardiovascular outcomes.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00273.x

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

47 Not checked yet · 7 Own interpretation · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 114 references — free account

Show all 29 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 25
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 3
26 of 26
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from cellular and animal models of cardiovascular disease are relevant to the mechanisms by which berries affect human cardiovascular health.

    “These animal and in vitro data show the potential of berries to ameliorate inflammation, glucose, and lipid abnormalities that contribute to CVD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Improvements in CVD risk factors such as glucose, lipids, and lipid peroxidation following berry intervention translate into reduced cardiovascular disease risk.

    “Clinical studies in healthy humans, subjects with diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, or in smokers, show a significant decrease in CVD risk factors, especially glucose, lipids and lipid peroxidation, and systolic blood pressure, following berry intervention.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 73 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. United States Department of Agriculture, 2004, Economic Research Service: Agriculture Information Bulletin 792.7
  2. Agricultural Research Services, 2009, National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference Service Release 22
  3. Agricultural Research Services, 2007, Database for the Flavonoid Content of Selected Foods Release 2.1, 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Basu, A., Rhone, M., & Lyons, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Oklahoma State University (US)
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
Venue
Nutrition Reviews
Published
2010-03
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
168-177
ISSN
  • 0029-6643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-4887
OpenAlex
W2096895152
Cited by
462
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 25
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cranberry Institute
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR-14467, M01RR014467)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
berries, cardiovascular health, anthocyanins, polyphenols, LDL oxidation, lipid peroxidation, antioxidant capacity, dyslipidemia, glucose metabolism, endothelial nitric oxide synthase, oxidative stress, inflammation, foam cell formation, heart-healthy diet, cranberry, blueberry, strawberry, chokeberry
MeSH terms
Anthocyanins, Antioxidants, Cardiovascular Diseases, Flavonoids, Fruit, Humans, Phenols, Vitamins, Lipid Peroxidation, Lipid Metabolism, Polyphenols

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review