Cited by 139Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Interplay between Oxytocin and Sensory Systems in the Orchestration of Socio-Emotional Behaviors

Open access
Grinevich, Valery, Stoop, Ron·2018·Neuron

Abstract

The neuropeptide oxytocin (OT) attracts the interest of neuroscientists, psychologists, and psychiatrists due to its capacity to modulate emotional and social behavior. Although much has been published on the effects of OT on brain regions and mechanisms at the core of these processes, its role in sensory processing, so important for detecting social context with sufficient accuracy and sensitivity, has been much less studied. In the present review, we summarize evidence for OT modulation of sensory processing and, conversely, effects of sensory input on endogenous OT signaling. We concentrate on mammals, aiming to provide a systematic analysis of the current knowledge on this reciprocal regulation and the role it may play in social and emotional behaviors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.016

Cites

233 of 233 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Veening, J.G., and Olivier, B. (2013). Intranasal administration of oxytocin: behavioral and clinical effects, a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37 , 14451465.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grinevich, V., & Stoop, R.
Affiliations
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Grinevich, Valery
  • Stoop, Ron
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
99
Issue
5
Pages
887-904
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891353824
Cited by
139
References
233
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Chica and Heinz Schaller Research Foundation
  • German Research Foundation (DFG) within the Collaborative Research Center (1134, 1158)
  • Human Frontiers Science Program (RGP0019/2015)
  • DFG-ANR GR (3619/7-1)
  • DFG-SNF GR (3619/8-1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
oxytocin, sensory processing, social behavior, emotional behavior, neuropeptides, mammals
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Emotions, Humans, Nerve Net, Oxytocin, Sensation, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review