Cited by 1,555RNA Interference and Gene DeliverySARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 267 of the 267 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 12 of the 231 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases: principles, delivery and clinical translation

Open access
Chaudhary, Namit, Weissman, Drew, Whitehead, Kathryn A.·2021·Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Abstract

Over the past several decades, messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines have progressed from a scepticism-inducing idea to clinical reality. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic catalysed the most rapid vaccine development in history, with mRNA vaccines at the forefront of those efforts. Although it is now clear that mRNA vaccines can rapidly and safely protect patients from infectious disease, additional research is required to optimize mRNA design, intracellular delivery and applications beyond SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis. In this Review, we describe the technologies that underlie mRNA vaccines, with an emphasis on lipid nanoparticles and other non-viral delivery vehicles. We also overview the pipeline of mRNA vaccines against various infectious disease pathogens and discuss key questions for the future application of this breakthrough vaccine platform. The COVID-19 pandemic has established mRNA vaccines as a rapid, effective and safe approach for the protection of individuals from infectious disease. Here, Whitehead and colleagues review the principles of mRNA vaccine design, synthesis and delivery, assessing recent progress and key issues in the development of mRNA vaccines for a range of infectious diseases.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review describes the principles of mRNA vaccine design, lipid nanoparticle and other delivery systems, and clinical translation for infectious diseases, with emphasis on the rapid COVID-19 vaccine effort. It concludes that mRNA vaccines are a versatile and validated platform but still require optimization in delivery, durability, safety, variant coverage, and global access.

Key findings

  • mRNA vaccines moved from a scepticism-inducing idea to clinical reality, and COVID-19 catalysed the fastest vaccine development in history; as of 18 June 2021, 185 COVID-19 vaccine candidates were preclinical and 102 were in clinical trials, including 19 mRNA vaccines.
  • BNT162b2 showed 95% overall efficacy in phase III trials involving 43,548 participants, with 90–100% efficacy across subgroups; mRNA-1273 showed 94.1% efficacy in phase III trials involving 30,420 volunteers, and two doses of mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 were 90% effective in real-world conditions among 3,950 healthcare personnel, first responders, and other frontline workers.
  • CureVac’s CVnCoV demonstrated only 47% efficacy in phase IIb/III trials involving 40,000 participants across ten countries; interim analysis attributed the modest efficacy to emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants, with 57% of sequenced cases caused by variants of concern.
  • Lipid nanoparticles are the most clinically advanced mRNA delivery vehicles and typically contain an ionizable lipid, cholesterol, a helper phospholipid, and a PEGylated lipid; modified nucleosides such as N1-methylpseudouridine are used in BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 to avoid innate immune recognition and improve translation.

Methods

  • Narrative review, not a primary experimental study; it synthesizes published preclinical and clinical literature on mRNA vaccine design, delivery vehicles, and infectious disease applications.
  • Data include clinical trial tables for mRNA vaccines against infectious diseases beyond COVID-19 and against SARS-CoV-2, with a stated snapshot as of 18 June 2021.
  • Main analysis is qualitative synthesis of mRNA structure and synthesis, lipid/polymer/peptide/emulsion delivery systems, disease-specific vaccine progress, and key issues; no systematic search, meta-analysis, or primary data collection is described.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the duration of antibody response is complex, varies by antigen, and will require longer-term data for comprehensive understanding.
  • The paper states that mechanisms remain unclear for several issues, including vaccine-associated enhanced disease in RSV, the thermostability of CVnCoV and ARCoV, endosomal escape for some delivery systems, and allergic reactions potentially linked to PEGylated lipids.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review with a June 2021 data cutoff, it does not systematically assess study quality and its clinical landscape is rapidly evolving beyond the variants and vaccines discussed.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41573-021-00283-5

Cites

267 of 267 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

172 Not checked yet · 29 Own interpretation · 23 No basis given · 3 Supported · 3 Partly supported · 1 Own result · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 219 references — free account

Show all 141 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 72
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 26
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
90 of 90
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    mRNA vaccines encoding conformation-specific proteins, conserved regions of antigens or monoclonal antibodies can be safely delivered to healthy adults, children, elderly people and pregnant people.

    “Depending on the challenges, mRNA vaccines encoding conformation-specific proteins, conserved regions of antigens or monoclonal antibodies can be safely delivered to healthy adults, children, elderly people and pregnant people.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    On 11 December 2020, BNT162b2 received emergency authorization from the FDA and became the first mRNA drug approved for use in humans.

    “On 11 December 2020, the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine BNT162b2 received emergency authorization from the FDA and became the first mRNA drug approved for use in humans.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    One week later, mRNA-1273 was authorized for use in the USA.

    “One week later, the Moderna vaccine mRNA-1273 was also authorized for use in the USA.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 were the first SARS-CoV-2 vaccines to be authorized in the USA, the UK, Canada and several other countries.

    “Ultimately, they were the first SARS-CoV-2 vaccines to be authorized in the USA, the UK, Canada and several other countries.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Usually, the antigen encoded by vaccine mRNA is either the full-length spike protein or the spike protein's receptor-binding domain.

    “Usually, the antigen encoded by the vaccine mRNA is either the full-length spike protein or the spike protein’s receptor-binding domain.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Items 201–267 of 267

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Roth, N. et al. CV2CoV, an enhanced mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate, supports higher protein expression and improved immunogenicity in rats. bioRxiv, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.13.443734v1.full (2021). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,555

Metadata

Authors
Chaudhary, N., Weissman, D., & Whitehead, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Whitehead, Kathryn A.
Venue
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Published
2021-08-25
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
817-838
ISSN
  • 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1784
OpenAlex
W3193427089
Cited by
1,555
References
267
Citations by year
2026: 284 · 2025: 405 · 2024: 320 · 2023: 299 · 2022: 219 · 2021: 27
FWCI
22.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (DP2HD098860)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
mRNA vaccines, lipid nanoparticles, mRNA vaccine design, mRNA synthesis, COVID-19 vaccines, infectious disease vaccines, vaccine development pipeline, clinical translation
MeSH terms
Drug Development, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, mRNA Vaccines, Clinical Trials as Topic, Communicable Disease Control, Humans, RNA, Messenger, Vaccines, Synthetic, Drug Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review