Cited by 113Marine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationPlanarian Biology and Electrostimulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 172 of the 178 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 3 are not checked yet; 1 of the 125 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Gastric pouches and the mucociliary sole: setting the stage for nervous system evolution

Open access
Arendt, Detlev, Benito-Gutierrez, Elia, Brunet, Thibaut, Marlow, Heather·2015·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Prerequisite for tracing nervous system evolution is understanding of the body plan, feeding behaviour and locomotion of the first animals in which neurons evolved. Here, a comprehensive scenario is presented for the diversification of cell types in early metazoans, which enhanced feeding efficiency and led to the emergence of larger animals that were able to move. Starting from cup-shaped, gastraea-like animals with outer and inner choanoflagellate-like cells, two major innovations are discussed that set the stage for nervous system evolution. First, the invention of a mucociliary sole entailed a switch from intra- to extracellular digestion and increased the concentration of nutrients flowing into the gastric cavity. In these animals, an initial nerve net may have evolved via division of labour from mechanosensory-contractile cells in the lateral body wall, enabling coordinated movement of the growing body that involved both mucociliary creeping and changes of body shape. Second, the inner surface of the animals folded into metameric series of gastric pouches, which optimized nutrient resorption and allowed larger body sizes. The concomitant acquisition of bilateral symmetry may have allowed more directed locomotion and, with more demanding coordinative tasks, triggered the evolution of specialized nervous subsystems. Animals of this organizational state would have resembled Ediacarian fossils such as Dickinsonia and may have been close to the cnidarian–bilaterian ancestor. In the bilaterian lineage, the mucociliary sole was used mostly for creeping, or frequently lost. One possible remnant is the enigmatic Reissner's fibre in the ventral neural tube of cephalochordates and vertebrates.

Verified 2026-10-06 · 3 references not checked yet

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review proposes a cell-type–based scenario for early metazoan evolution in which a mucociliary sole for external digestion and metameric gastric pouches set the stage for nervous system evolution. It argues that the first nerve net arose by division of labour from mechanosensory-contractile ectochoanocytes, and that animals of this grade resembled Ediacaran *Dickinsonia* and were close to the cnidarian–bilaterian ancestor.

Key findings

  • Two major innovations are proposed as prerequisites for nervous system evolution: a mucociliary sole, which switched feeding from intra- to extracellular digestion and increased nutrient concentration in the gastric cavity, and metameric gastric pouches, which expanded resorptive surface and allowed larger body sizes.
  • The first nerve net is hypothesized to have evolved by division of labour from mechanosensory-contractile cells in the lateral body wall, enabling coordinated movement involving mucociliary creeping and body-shape changes; glutamate is proposed as the first excitatory transmitter and GABA as inhibitory.
  • Gastric pouches are proposed as homologous to bilaterian coelomic cavities, supported by *gbx* expression in all but the first pair of pouches in sea anemone and amphioxus, staggered/collinear *hox* expression, and expression of somitic musculature genes such as *mox* and *twist*.
  • The organizational grade is compared to Ediacaran *Dickinsonia*, with its metameric digestive diverticula, and placed close to the cnidarian–bilaterian ancestor; Reissner’s fibre in cephalochordates and vertebrates is suggested as a possible remnant of the mucociliary sole.

Methods

  • This is a review and synthetic evolutionary scenario, not a primary data paper; it integrates comparative structural and ultrastructural data, molecular studies on basal metazoans and choanoflagellates, developmental biology, and palaeontology.
  • The main analytical framework is cell-type diversification via the sister cell-type concept and division of labour, used to infer ancestral cell types such as ectochoanocytes, endochoanocytes, kopeocytes, mucocytes, zymocytes, enterocytes, and nerve net neurons.
  • Homology arguments draw on gene expression data, including *gbx*, *hox*, *mox*, *twist*, *foxj*, *foxA*, *atonal*, and *achaete-scute* family genes, alongside fossil comparisons such as *Dickinsonia*.

Limitations

  • The paper states that in the absence of comparative molecular data for most cell types discussed, the postulated sequence of cell-type diversification remains tentative.
  • The paper notes that the early metazoan tree remains unsolved, the placement of ctenophores is uncertain, and the existence of a “Neuralia” grouping excluding sponges and placozoans remains unsettled.
  • The paper states it cannot explain why Reissner’s fibre is so persistent in extant vertebrates; more broadly, the text makes evident that many proposed cell types and transitions are hypothetical and not yet directly tested by comparative single-cell profiling.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2015.0286

Cites

172 of 175 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1. Cell-type diversification in metazoan evolution. (a) A simplified tree of metazoan evolution, with major inventions mapped. CBA, cnidarian–bilaterian ancestor; LMCA, last metazoan common ancestor. (b) The interrelationship between species, cell type and molecular evolution. The scheme shows how the cell-type tree is embedded in the species tree, and the inset shows how cell-type diversification is paralleled by subfunctionalization (yellow and dark blue lines), divergence (bright blue line) and neofunctionalization (green line) of molecules and cellular modules. It contains examples for each possible mode of cellular diversification—via functional segregation, divergence or co-option of differentiation modules. Functional segregation implies that molecular machines are differentially distributed between emergent sister cell types. At gene level, functional segregation leads to the loss of entire differentiation modules from the specializing cells. This is distinct from functional divergence, where functions (and modules) are retained and modified in different directions.
Figure 1. Cell-type diversification in metazoan evolution. (a) A simplified tree of metazoan evolution, with major inventions mapped. CBA, cnidarian–bilaterian ancestor; LMCA, last metazoan common ancestor. (b) The interrelationship between species, cell type and molecular evolution. The scheme shows how the cell-type tree is embedded in the species tree, and the inset shows how cell-type diversification is paralleled by subfunctionalization (yellow and dark blue lines), divergence (bright blue line) and neofunctionalization (green line) of molecules and cellular modules. It contains examples for each possible mode of cellular diversification—via functional segregation, divergence or co-option of differentiation modules. Functional segregation implies that molecular machines are differentially distributed between emergent sister cell types. At gene level, functional segregation leads to the loss of entire differentiation modules from the specializing cells. This is distinct from functional divergence, where functions (and modules) are retained and modified in different directions.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2. The origin of metazoans, involving a change from facultative transitions between forms (orange arrows) to fixed life-cycle transitions in development (blue arrows), and a move from temporal differentiation of cell types to spatial differentiation. Block arrows indicate direction of evolutionary change. (a) Pre-metazoan state with transitions between chain colonies (cc), amoeboid cells (ac), slow swimmers (ss), fast swimmers (fs) and rosette colonies (rc). 2n and n indicate life cycle transition between diploid and haploid state. (b) Stem metazoan. Variant (a): The zygote develops into a swimming choanoblastaea (cb). Variant (b): The zygote develops into a benthic, epithelial, biofilm-like organism (be). Transitions between the two forms might have occurred by epithelial curvature (stippled arrows) and closure. (c) Last metazoan common ancestor (LMCA). The zygote (2n) develops via cleavage into a blastula (bl; variant a), or, into a sheet-like embryo (se; variant b), which inverts into an amphiblastula larva (as seen in calcareous sponges; stippled arrows). The amphiblastula gastrulates into the adult gastraea (ga), which produces gametes and closes the life cycle.
Figure 2. The origin of metazoans, involving a change from facultative transitions between forms (orange arrows) to fixed life-cycle transitions in development (blue arrows), and a move from temporal differentiation of cell types to spatial differentiation. Block arrows indicate direction of evolutionary change. (a) Pre-metazoan state with transitions between chain colonies (cc), amoeboid cells (ac), slow swimmers (ss), fast swimmers (fs) and rosette colonies (rc). 2n and n indicate life cycle transition between diploid and haploid state. (b) Stem metazoan. Variant (a): The zygote develops into a swimming choanoblastaea (cb). Variant (b): The zygote develops into a benthic, epithelial, biofilm-like organism (be). Transitions between the two forms might have occurred by epithelial curvature (stippled arrows) and closure. (c) Last metazoan common ancestor (LMCA). The zygote (2n) develops via cleavage into a blastula (bl; variant a), or, into a sheet-like embryo (se; variant b), which inverts into an amphiblastula larva (as seen in calcareous sponges; stippled arrows). The amphiblastula gastrulates into the adult gastraea (ga), which produces gametes and closes the life cycle.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3. The gastraea, the last common ancestor of living phyla. (a) The gastraea. This cup-shaped animal resulted from simple infolding of the initial blastaea and first cell-type diversification. Colours relate to similar cell types in (b) and (c). (b) Infolding of the amphiblastula larva of calcareous sponges into a cup-shaped transitory stage that resembles a gastrula. The inner cells express endomesodermal markers, after [41,42] and various sources. (c) The initial diversification of metazoan cell types into sensory-contractile cell types and cell types related to feeding. The colour scheme matches the cells of the gastraea in (a). A multifunctional choanocyte-like cell type gives rise to ectochoanocytes, endochoanocytes and kopeocytes (black arrows). These ancestral cells had an apical, undulating cilium or flagellum, propelling water away from the cell, surrounded by a circle of long, contractile, actin-containing microvilli. A well-developed Golgi complex produces lysosomes for intracellular digestion, and a prominent endocytotic machinery mediates phagocytosis (Pc). Mm, mucoid mesh; Fp, filopodia.
Figure 3. The gastraea, the last common ancestor of living phyla. (a) The gastraea. This cup-shaped animal resulted from simple infolding of the initial blastaea and first cell-type diversification. Colours relate to similar cell types in (b) and (c). (b) Infolding of the amphiblastula larva of calcareous sponges into a cup-shaped transitory stage that resembles a gastrula. The inner cells express endomesodermal markers, after [41,42] and various sources. (c) The initial diversification of metazoan cell types into sensory-contractile cell types and cell types related to feeding. The colour scheme matches the cells of the gastraea in (a). A multifunctional choanocyte-like cell type gives rise to ectochoanocytes, endochoanocytes and kopeocytes (black arrows). These ancestral cells had an apical, undulating cilium or flagellum, propelling water away from the cell, surrounded by a circle of long, contractile, actin-containing microvilli. A well-developed Golgi complex produces lysosomes for intracellular digestion, and a prominent endocytotic machinery mediates phagocytosis (Pc). Mm, mucoid mesh; Fp, filopodia.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4. Evolution of the mucociliary sole. (a) Body fossil of Dickinsonia costata associated with a series of feeding traces, reproduced with permission from [3]. Numbers delineate the order of their formation in relation to the body fossil at the end of the series of traces (trace #3 made last). Scale bar, 2 cm. (b) Cell types of the placozoan Trochoplax, reproduced with permission from [103]. The thick ventral body surface is composed of ventral epithelial cells (vci), each bearing a cilium and multiple microvilli; lipophil cells (lc); and gland cells (gc), distinguished by their contents of secretory granules and prevalence near the margin. Dorsal epithelial cells (dec) constitute the dorsal surface. In between the dorsal epithelium and ventral plate are fibre cells (fc) with branching processes that contact each of the other cell types. cc, crystal cell; dci, dorsal ciliated cell; gc, gland cell. (c) A hypothetical gastraea-like ancestor with mucociliary sole. In these animals, mucocytes, zymocytes and serotonergic cells (brown) and motile ciliary cells (red) are located around the gastric opening. Contractile cells with ring-shaped fibres, excretory cells and enterocytes (all green) populate the gastric cavity. Mechanosensory cells (yellow) and contractile epithelial cells (orange) are hypothesised for a primordial nerve net. Blue arrows indicate direction of water flow across the mucociliary sole and into the gastric cavity. (d) Hypothetical diversification scheme for mucociliary cell types. (e) Hypothetical diversification scheme for endochoanocytes. (f) Hypothetical diversification scheme for ectochoanocytes into nerve net cells.
Figure 4. Evolution of the mucociliary sole. (a) Body fossil of Dickinsonia costata associated with a series of feeding traces, reproduced with permission from [3]. Numbers delineate the order of their formation in relation to the body fossil at the end of the series of traces (trace #3 made last). Scale bar, 2 cm. (b) Cell types of the placozoan Trochoplax, reproduced with permission from [103]. The thick ventral body surface is composed of ventral epithelial cells (vci), each bearing a cilium and multiple microvilli; lipophil cells (lc); and gland cells (gc), distinguished by their contents of secretory granules and prevalence near the margin. Dorsal epithelial cells (dec) constitute the dorsal surface. In between the dorsal epithelium and ventral plate are fibre cells (fc) with branching processes that contact each of the other cell types. cc, crystal cell; dci, dorsal ciliated cell; gc, gland cell. (c) A hypothetical gastraea-like ancestor with mucociliary sole. In these animals, mucocytes, zymocytes and serotonergic cells (brown) and motile ciliary cells (red) are located around the gastric opening. Contractile cells with ring-shaped fibres, excretory cells and enterocytes (all green) populate the gastric cavity. Mechanosensory cells (yellow) and contractile epithelial cells (orange) are hypothesised for a primordial nerve net. Blue arrows indicate direction of water flow across the mucociliary sole and into the gastric cavity. (d) Hypothetical diversification scheme for mucociliary cell types. (e) Hypothetical diversification scheme for endochoanocytes. (f) Hypothetical diversification scheme for ectochoanocytes into nerve net cells.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5. Evolution of the nerve net. (a) Evolution of a sensory-contractile network of neurons and muscle cells by division of labour [5,6,125], following an initial scenario proposed by Mackie [126]. Starting point is a network of multifunctional, sensory-contractile cells in the gastraea ectoderm. Contractile fibres are oriented along the apical-blastoporal body axis. Individual sensory-motor neurons innervate many muscle cells. (b) Cell types of the cnidarian nerve net, modified from [127]. (c) The neuromuscular orthogon. Muscle cells have congregated into muscle strands. The evolution of true sensory, inter- and motorneurons enables the differential and antagonistic contraction of entire muscle strands as a response to remote stimuli. (d) Ganglion cells in the ectodermal nerve net in Cerianthus, after [128]. (e) Mechanosensory ciliary-cone receptors in the ectodermal nerve net in Cerianthus, after [56]. (f) Bipolar cells in the ectodermal nerve net in Cerianthus, after [128]. (g) Connections and signaling directions (arrows) in the nerve net of Cerianthus, after [128].
Figure 5. Evolution of the nerve net. (a) Evolution of a sensory-contractile network of neurons and muscle cells by division of labour [5,6,125], following an initial scenario proposed by Mackie [126]. Starting point is a network of multifunctional, sensory-contractile cells in the gastraea ectoderm. Contractile fibres are oriented along the apical-blastoporal body axis. Individual sensory-motor neurons innervate many muscle cells. (b) Cell types of the cnidarian nerve net, modified from [127]. (c) The neuromuscular orthogon. Muscle cells have congregated into muscle strands. The evolution of true sensory, inter- and motorneurons enables the differential and antagonistic contraction of entire muscle strands as a response to remote stimuli. (d) Ganglion cells in the ectodermal nerve net in Cerianthus, after [128]. (e) Mechanosensory ciliary-cone receptors in the ectodermal nerve net in Cerianthus, after [56]. (f) Bipolar cells in the ectodermal nerve net in Cerianthus, after [128]. (g) Connections and signaling directions (arrows) in the nerve net of Cerianthus, after [128].CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6. The evolution of gastric pouches. (a) Hypothetical modified gastraea with an anterior and a posterior pouch, separated by the primary mesenteries. Establishment of bilateral symmetry. Schematic lateral views (upper panels) and ventral views (lower panels). (b) Duplicated pouches leading to two bilateral sets of gastric pouches separated by mesenteries. Schematic lateral views (upper panels) and ventral views (lower panels). (c) Gbx expression in the gastric pouches of the Nematostella late planula (left) and in the amphioxus embryo (right). Midlle panels show gbx expression in a general cnidarian versus bilaterian (with slit-like blastopore). (d) The metameric gastric diverticula of Dickinsonia, adapted with permission from [161]. Stippled circle indicates inferred zone where additional diverticula have been added. (e) The metameric gastric pouches of Cerianthus, adapted from [162]. Stippled circle indicates growth zone where additional mesenteries develop.
Figure 6. The evolution of gastric pouches. (a) Hypothetical modified gastraea with an anterior and a posterior pouch, separated by the primary mesenteries. Establishment of bilateral symmetry. Schematic lateral views (upper panels) and ventral views (lower panels). (b) Duplicated pouches leading to two bilateral sets of gastric pouches separated by mesenteries. Schematic lateral views (upper panels) and ventral views (lower panels). (c) Gbx expression in the gastric pouches of the Nematostella late planula (left) and in the amphioxus embryo (right). Midlle panels show gbx expression in a general cnidarian versus bilaterian (with slit-like blastopore). (d) The metameric gastric diverticula of Dickinsonia, adapted with permission from [161]. Stippled circle indicates inferred zone where additional diverticula have been added. (e) The metameric gastric pouches of Cerianthus, adapted from [162]. Stippled circle indicates growth zone where additional mesenteries develop.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7. The evolution of the bilaterian nervous system. (a) Neuralian ancestor. A nerve net covers the gastrula-shaped animal. Nerve net neurons situated around the digestive opening (red) control feeding. White arrows indicate direction of water flow. (b) Cnidarian–bilaterian ancestor. Specialized parts of the nerve net are centred on the slit-like digestive opening: the nerve of the digestive sole (red) and the sensory-integrative centre (yellow), controlling contraction of a bilaterial series of contractile gastric pouches. White arrows indicate direction of water flow. (c) Urbilaterian. Motor centre of the ventral nerve cord (red) and sensory-integrative centre (yellow). White arrows indicate direction of water flow.
Figure 7. The evolution of the bilaterian nervous system. (a) Neuralian ancestor. A nerve net covers the gastrula-shaped animal. Nerve net neurons situated around the digestive opening (red) control feeding. White arrows indicate direction of water flow. (b) Cnidarian–bilaterian ancestor. Specialized parts of the nerve net are centred on the slit-like digestive opening: the nerve of the digestive sole (red) and the sensory-integrative centre (yellow), controlling contraction of a bilaterial series of contractile gastric pouches. White arrows indicate direction of water flow. (c) Urbilaterian. Motor centre of the ventral nerve cord (red) and sensory-integrative centre (yellow). White arrows indicate direction of water flow.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

62 Not checked yet · 52 Own interpretation · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Own method

Verify all 124 references — free account

Show all 60 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 41
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 25
58 of 58
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A nervous system was present in the last common ancestor of cnidarians and bilaterians (the cnidarian-bilaterian ancestor, CBA).

    “Almost certainly, a nervous system was present in the last common ancestor of cnidarians and bilaterians (cnidarian-bilaterian ancestor, CBA)”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The ancient gastraea crept on the sea floor with the gastric opening facing downwards.

    “The ancient gastraea is originally assumed as creeping on the sea floor, with the gastric opening facing downwards”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Dickinsonia's entire ventral body surface was a digestive sole covered with mucus and cilia.

    “It is assumed that their entire ventral body surface was a digestive ‘sole’ covered with mucus and cilia [3].”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A nerve net existed in the last common ancestor of cnidarians, ctenophores and bilaterians (Neuralia), at the exclusion of sponges and placozoans.

    “As sponges and placozoans do not form a nerve net, the most parsimonious assumption appears to be that a nerve net existed in the last common ancestor of cnidarians, ctenophores and bilaterians (a grouping referred to as Neuralia by Nielsen [8]); yet, in light of the current uncertainties about the placement of the ctenophores [137], the existence of the ‘Neuralia’ at the exclusion of sponges and”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The overall establishment of internal currents passing through the surface-extended pouches closely resembled that of some extant cnidarians.

    “Apart from that, we can assume that the overall establishment of internal currents passing through the surface-extended pouches might have closely resembled that of some extant cnidarians.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Haeckel E, 1874, Die Gastraea-Theorie, die phylogenetische Classification des Thierreiches und die Homologie der Keimblätter, Jena Z. Naturwiss, 8, 1
  2. Leadbeater BSC, 1983, Distribution and chemistry of microfilaments in choanoflagellates, with special reference to the collar and other tentacle systems, Protistologia, 10, 157
  3. Aiello E, 1974, Cilia and flagella, 353
  4. Arendt D, 2004, Gastrulation
  5. Hertwig O, 1879, Die Actinien. In Studien zur Blättertheorie
  6. Bullock TH, 1965, Structure and function in the nervous system of invertebrates
  7. Hernandez-Nicaise ML, 1991, Microscopic anatomy of the invertebrates, volume Placozoa, Porifera, Cnidaria, and Ctenophora, 359

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 113

Metadata

Authors
Arendt, D., Benito-Gutierrez, E., Brunet, T., & Marlow, H.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69012 Heidelberg, Germany
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
Corresponding author
Arendt, Detlev
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2015-12-19
Volume
370
Issue
1684
Pages
20150286
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2178149281
Cited by
112
References
178
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Keywords
nervous system evolution, gastric pouch, feeding behaviour, locomotion, nerve net, bilateral symmetry, Ediacaran fossils, Dickinsonia, cephalochordates, nutrient resorption
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Nerve Net, Nervous System, Gastrointestinal Tract

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review