Cited by 3,287Immune cells in cancerT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyImmune Response and Inflammation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

M-1/M-2 Macrophages and the Th1/Th2 Paradigm

Abstract

Evidence is provided that macrophages can make M-1 or M-2 responses. The concept of M-1/M-2 fomented from observations that macrophages from prototypical Th1 strains (C57BL/6, B10D2) are more easily activated to produce NO with either IFN-gamma or LPS than macrophages from Th2 strains (BALB/c, DBA/2). In marked contrast, LPS stimulates Th2, but not Th1, macrophages to increase arginine metabolism to ornithine. Thus, M-1/M-2 does not simply describe activated or unactivated macrophages, but cells expressing distinct metabolic programs. Because NO inhibits cell division, while ornithine can stimulate cell division (via polyamines), these results also indicate that M-1 and M-2 responses can influence inflammatory reactions in opposite ways. Macrophage TGF-beta1, which inhibits inducible NO synthase and stimulates arginase, appears to play an important role in regulating the balance between M-1 and M-2. M-1/M-2 phenotypes are independent of T or B lymphocytes because C57BL/6 and BALB/c NUDE or SCID macrophages also exhibit M-1/M-2. Indeed, M-1/M-2 proclivities are magnified in NUDE and SCID mice. Finally, C57BL/6 SCID macrophages cause CB6F1 lymphocytes to increase IFN-gamma production, while BALB/c SCID macrophages increase TGF-beta production. Together, the results indicate that M-1- or M-2-dominant macrophage responses can influence whether Th1/Th2 or other types of inflammatory responses occur.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. 1905, Immunity in Infective Diseases
  2. 1964, J. Exp. Med., 105
  3. 1978, J. Immunol., 806
  4. 1984, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 283
  5. 1987, J. Immunol., 550
  6. 1987, J. Clin. Invest., 319
  7. 1991, Curr. Opin. Immunol., 65
  8. 1996, Res. Immunol., 199
  9. 1999, Science, 1313
  10. 1989, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 145
  11. 1993, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 6115
  12. 1994, Curr. Opin. Immunol., 458
  13. 1988, J. Exp. Med., 1675
  14. 1989, J. Exp. Med., 59
  15. 1999, J. Immunol., 3771
  16. 1995, J. Exp. Med., 713
  17. 1986, J. Immunol., 3884
  18. 1991, Eur. J. Immunol., 3009
  19. 1992, J. Leukocyte Biol., 315
  20. 1994, J. Exp. Med., 783
  21. 1995, J. Interferon Cytokine Res., 387
  22. 1994, J. Immunol., 4378
  23. 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1036
  24. 1999, J. Exp. Med., 587
  25. 1999, Science, 1183
  26. 1999, Immunol. Today, 561
  27. 1998, Nature, 245
  28. 1979, Perspect. Biol. Med., 421
  29. 1998, Biochem. J., 1
  30. 1991, J. Immunol., 2719
  31. 1992, The Biology of Nitric Oxide, 228
  32. 1988, J. Immunol., 2407
  33. 1973, J. Exp. Med., 1194
  34. 1984, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 395
  35. 1975, Am. J. Pathol., 71
  36. 1987, Science, 442
  37. 1990, J. Immunol., 3877
  38. 1998, Am. J. Physiol., G879
  39. 1993, Am. J. Surg., 144
  40. 1993, J. Surg. Res., 97
  41. 1992, J. Immunol., 2709
  42. 1981, J. Immunol., 1863
  43. 1978, J. Immunol., 72
  44. 1998, Immunity, 77
  45. 1990, J. Immunol., 940
  46. 1993, J. Exp. Med., 605
  47. 1995, J. Immunol., 2077
  48. 1995, J. Immunol., 5320
  49. 1998, J. Immunol., 6148
  50. 1999, J. Immunol., 974
  51. 1995, J. Immunol., 1450
  52. 1988, Nature, 260
  53. 1996, J. Immunol., 1499
  54. 1989, J. Exp. Med., 1021
  55. 1926, J. Exp. Med., 461
  56. 1989, Parasitol. Res., 150
  57. 1997, Am. J. Physiol., E181
  58. 1998, J. Immunol., 6878
  59. 1994, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 991
  60. 1998, Immunol. Rev., 5
  61. 1994, Immunol. Ser., 203
  62. 1998, J. Exp. Med., 1603
  63. 1999, J. Exp. Med., 219
  64. 1995, Eur. J. Immunol., 1101

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mills, C. D., Kincaid, K., Alt, J. M., Heilman, M. J., & Hill, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2000-06
Volume
164
Issue
12
Pages
6166-6173
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2163175900
Cited by
3,287
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 159 · 2025: 238 · 2024: 269 · 2023: 253 · 2022: 291 · 2021: 302 · 2020: 258 · 2019: 191 · 2018: 157 · 2017: 156 · 2016: 160 · 2015: 138 · 2014: 115 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 73
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01gm050150-05, 5r01dk051495-02)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (5P01GM50150)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK51495)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
Th1/Th2 balance, nitric oxide, arginine metabolism, ornithine, TGF-β1, inducible nitric oxide synthase, arginase, macrophage activation, interferon-gamma, lipopolysaccharide, polyamines, SCID mice, nude mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Arginine, Cells, Cultured, Female, Lymphocyte Activation, Macrophage Activation, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred DBA, Mice, Nude, Nitric Oxide, Species Specificity, Spleen, Immunophenotyping, Cytokines, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Mice, SCID, Macrophages, Peritoneal, Th1 Cells, Th2 Cells, Coculture Techniques, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review