The DOI matches its Crossref record; 238 of the 240 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 277 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome: Summary of an evidence-based guideline
Abstract
Helena J Teede, Marie L Misso, Amanda A Deeks, Lisa J Moran, Bronwyn G A Stuckey, Jennifer L A Wong, Robert J Norman and Michael F Costello on behalf of the Guideline Development Groups
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This summary presents an NHMRC-approved Australian evidence-based guideline for assessment and management of PCOS, covering diagnosis, cardiometabolic and emotional wellbeing, lifestyle, and infertility. It recommends lifestyle management as first-line therapy and highlights high prevalence, underdiagnosis, and poor-quality evidence in many areas.
Key findings
- PCOS affects 12%–21% of Australian reproductive-age women; about 70% remain undiagnosed; among Indigenous Australian women, prevalence appears as high as 21% by Rotterdam criteria, and in one group 30.3% were obese and 7.0% had a normal BMI.
- Diagnosis uses Rotterdam criteria requiring two of oligo- or anovulation, clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism, and polycystic ovaries on ultrasound; calculated bioavailable testosterone, calculated free testosterone, or free androgen index should be first-line for biochemical hyperandrogenism (Grade C).
- Cardiometabolic and psychological risks are elevated: women with PCOS have a 5–10-fold risk of progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes and a 4–7-fold risk of type 2 diabetes; depression prevalence is 28%–64% versus 7.1%–8.0% in the general population, and anxiety is 34%–57% versus 18%.
- Lifestyle management (diet, exercise, and/or behavioural interventions) is first-line; 5%–10% weight loss improves features. One systematic review found lifestyle intervention outperformed minimal treatment for total testosterone (P=0.004), hirsutism by Ferriman-Gallwey score (P=0.04), weight (P<0.001), waist circumference (P=0.006), fasting insulin (P=0.002), OGTT insulin (P<0.001), and percent weight change (P<0.001).
Methods
- The guideline was developed by an independent PCOS Australian Alliance under the Jean Hailes Foundation for Women’s Health, following NHMRC standards; four guideline development groups addressed 22 clinical questions, producing 38 recommendations graded A–D.
- Evidence reviews searched multiple databases until November 2010; included studies were classified by NHMRC levels of evidence and appraised for risk of bias, with meta-analyses performed where appropriate.
- Recommendations integrated best available evidence, clinical expertise, and consumer preferences; where evidence was insufficient, clinical consensus recommendations were developed. Public consultation ran for 30 days from 5 March 2011, and the guideline was approved by NHMRC in July 2011.
Limitations
- The paper states that the complexity of PCOS meant not all aspects could be addressed; generally there is a paucity of evidence and available evidence is of poor quality; consensus recommendations were often informed by evidence in other similar conditions; no formal cost-effectiveness analysis was completed; the guideline is based on evidence up to November 2010; recommendations are limited by applicability and generalisability; and implementation may face cultural barriers.
- The text makes evident that many recommendations are clinical consensus rather than evidence-based (e.g., interdisciplinary care, emotional wellbeing screening, bariatric surgery), and that evidence often comes from non-PCOS or predominantly Caucasian populations and may not generalise to Indigenous populations.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
164 Not checked yet · 22 Own interpretation · 14 Own method · 10 No basis given · 7 Own result · 2 Supported · 1 Supported so far · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“metabolic challenges most notable after this”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [11] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) says glucose tolerance worsens with ageing and notes that elevated fasting glucose was most frequent in a study of post-menopausal women with PCOS. It does not establish that metabolic challenges generally are most notable after the 20s and 30s; the Introduction also says they commonly occur in adolescents with PCOS. (LLM, conf=0.83)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Presentation varies across the life span.”
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Two patients had adverse events in the metformin group, 212”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [212] source
The participant-flow passage reports that two subjects taking metformin cited adverse effects as a contributing reason for dropping out. This count includes subjects taking metformin alone or with lifestyle modification; the paper does not assign both to the metformin-alone arm. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plainn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The remaining two studies provided insufficient lower-quality evidence to support any differences between total testosterone, SHBG and androstenedione levels with respect to their value in PCOS diagnosis. 60,62”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“We did not identify any PCOS-specific evidence to answer the question, so a clinical consensus recommendation has been made based on key relevant sources of evidencebased information for the general population and the clinical expertise of the multidisciplinary guideline development group. 37,39”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37]
- Not checked yetcites [39]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We did not identify any PCOS-specific evidence to answer the question; therefore, a clinical consensus recommendation was made based on key relevant sources of evidence-based information for the general population and the clinical expertise of the multidisciplinary guideline development group.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was little difference between lifestyle (diet) therapy (with or without placebo) and pharmacological therapy (with or without lifestyle [diet] therapy) for fertility outcomes.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“There remains inadequate highquality evidence on pregnancy outcomes with lifestyle intervention in PCOS. 163”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [163]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ten RCTs (level II), of moderate 157,209,210 to high 145,154,155,211-214 risk of bias compared various types of lifestyle interventions (including low-carbohydrate or healthy diets, exercise programs and group sessions) to pharmacological therapy (including metformin or clomiphene citrate) among women with PCOS and a BMI ⩾ 25 kg/m 2 .”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Six women withdrew from the placebo plus diet group due to undefined side effects within the first 2 months of the study. 155”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [155]
plaindirectn = 6- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 84
- Probably not a substantial claim. 56
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“One high-quality RCT (level II) with a low risk of bias using letrozole versus placebo in PCOS with CCR, found letrozole better for ovulation rates ( P =0.006) but similar for pregnancy rate and live birth rate per patient. 243”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [243] source
The trial reports six ovulations with letrozole versus none with placebo (P=0.006) in women with PCOS and clomiphene resistance. It reports one pregnancy and live birth in the letrozole arm and none in the placebo arm; thus, 'similar' means no demonstrated difference in those outcomes, not identical rates. The methods describe randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding, consistent with the citing paper's low-risk-of-bias characterization. (LLM, conf=0.89)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
In the paper
“Studies examining the reproductive effects of metformin in PCOS suggest benefits but are limited by study design. 223”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [223] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Metformin regimens in PCOS are not well standardised in research or clinical practice, with doses varying between 500 and 2550 mg per day and both standard and slowrelease preparations available. 209”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [209] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The rates of twin and triplet pregnancy with clomiphene citrate are 5%-7% and 0.3%, respectively.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [219] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gonadotrophins appear to be as effective as laparoscopic ovarian surgery”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One high-quality RCT (level II) with low risk of bias found 10 days of letrozole better than 5 days for pregnancy rate per cycle ( P =0.03), with no differences in ovulation rate per patient and miscarriage rate per pregnancy among women with CCR PCOS. 246”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [246] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mechanisms underpinning hormonal changes and resumption of ovulation remain poorly understood.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One high-quality systematic review of RCTs (level I) with low risk of bias compared laparoscopic ovarian surgery to gonadotrophins with no differences for live birth rate, pregnancy and ovulation rate per patient and miscarriage rate per pregnancy, but laparoscopic ovarian surgery had fewer multiple pregnancies. 255”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [255]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mechanisms of action, comparative effectiveness and the long-term risks of laparoscopic ovarian surgery in infertile women with PCOS still remain unclear”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One high-quality RCT (level II) with a low risk of bias found that clomiphene citrate plus metformin was better than laparoscopic ovarian surgery for ovulation rate per cycle ( P =0.02), but there was no difference for live birth rate, pregnancy rate per cycle and miscarriage rate per pregnancy. 256”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [256] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is little research addressing the long-term complications of laparoscopic ovarian surgery.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Laparoscopic ovarian surgery, when compared with other second-line treatments, is equally effective as gonadotrophins, with fewer multiple pregnancies.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recent meta-analysis of bariatric surgery in general populations reports weight loss of 38.5 kg or 56% excess weight loss and resolution of DM2 in 78% of patients with DM2. 266”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [266] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There was insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of laparoscopic ovarian surgery over either metformin or clomiphene citrate alone, or clomiphene citrate plus metformin, for multiple pregnancies, 257,260 and there was insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of laparoscopic ovarian surgery over any intervention for adverse effects and QoL.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Generally in PCOS, there is a paucity of evidence and the evidence that is available is of poor quality”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“PCOS has potential for major metabolic consequences, including obesity and related type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) as well as cardiovascular disease (CVD)”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“being more common among those who are overweight or of Indigenous background.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has recently been shown to affect a striking 12%-21% of Australian reproductive-age women”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Indigenous women appear to have a higher prevalence and severity of PCOS.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] source
- Not checked yetcites [12]
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It also has significant mental health and psychological impact, impairing quality of life (QoL).”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“PCOS has significant and diverse implications, including reproductive (hyperandrogenism, hirsutism, anovulation, infertility), metabolic (insulin resistance [IR], impaired glucose tolerance, DM2, adverse cardiovascular risk profiles) and psychological features (increased anxiety and depression and worsened QoL).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“fertility issues most prominent among women in their 20s and 30s”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“It is estimated that 70% of Australian women with PCOS remain undiagnosed”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The role of ultrasound remains controversial for adolescents, among whom a polycystic appearance of the ovaries is very common, potentially leading to overdiagnosis; 16”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“challenges to feminine identity and body image due to obesity, acne, excess hair, infertility and long-term health-related concerns compromise QoL and adversely affect mood and psychological wellbeing.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Women with PCOS present with psychological, 5,23 reproductive 24 and metabolic implications.”
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“With a higher prevalence and greater severity of depression and anxiety, low self-esteem, negative body image, and psychosexual dysfunction, 5,25”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Diagnosis of PCOS is now largely based on the Rotterdam criteria, 14 which are inclusive of the original National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria 15 and require two of three key features: oligo- or anovulation, clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism and polycystic ovaries on ultrasound (Figure 2).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] source
- Not checked yetcites [15]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“PCOS phenotypes vary widely depending on life stage, genotype, ethnicity and environmental factors, including lifestyle and body weight.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Indeed, the adverse impact of obesity on fertility, exacerbated by delay in childbearing, is resulting in a significant social, health and economic burden in Australia. 35”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Women with PCOS are therefore a population at high risk of developing DM2 and CVD.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Obesity has a specific impact on women's reproductive health, increasing the prevalence and severity of PCOS, infertility, pregnancy complications, gestational diabetes and fetal pregnancy complications, with substantial and escalating economic costs. 33,34”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Women with PCOS also have an increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome (associated with an increased risk for DM2 and CVD), 28”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“individual risk factors for CVD and clinical signs of atherosclerosis, 29,30”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Obesity is now the primary cause of chronic disease among Australian women, with adverse outcomes including DM2 and CVD. 31”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Cardiovascular risk factors are increased and CVD appears more prevalent among women with PCOS despite inadequate long-term studies to appropriately address this question. 22”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There are limited clinical guidelines and no evidence-based guidelines, either in Australia or internationally, for assessment or management of women with PCOS; rather, PCOS is briefly mentioned within guidelines for the management of obesity and DM2. 45,54”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45]
- Not checked yetcites [54]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The recommendations in this guideline are strengthened by the use of rigorous methodology for evidence review and guideline development, including use of: study designs least susceptible to bias; a-priori criteria for inclusion and appraisal of studies; extraction of study data; and meta-analysis where appropriate.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The prevalence of PCOS among Indigenous Australian women appears to be as high as 21% by the Rotterdam criteria 12 and the NIH criteria, 50 and increases with rising BMI. 12”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12]
- Not checked yetcites [50] source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Survey (NATSIHS) found that Indigenous Australians are 1.2 times more likely to be overweight or obese than non-Indigenous Australians, and this disparity is greatest for women. 51”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51]
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Evidence reviews were conducted for each of the 22 identified clinical questions.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Included studies were classified according to the NHMRC levels of evidence 56 and appraised using a-priori criteria according to study design, using a descriptive component approach to assign a risk of bias rating. 57”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [56]
- Not checked yetcites [57]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The risk of metabolic complications is already high among Indigenous women, independent of PCOS; therefore, PCOS can amplify metabolic risk in these women.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Public and targeted consultation on the draft guideline was conducted for 30 days commencing 5 March 2011, in accordance with the legislative requirements for approval of externally developed guidelines under Section 14A of the National Health and Medical Research Council Act 1992 (Cwlth).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“DM2 is the second-commonest cause of mortality and disabilityadjusted life-years (DALY) among Indigenous women. 52”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [52]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“this NHMRC-approved evidence-based guideline followed a rigorous, systematic process of development, which is briefly outlined below and in detail in the full guideline. 8”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In a group of Indigenous women with PCOS, 30.3% were obese and 7.0% had a normal BMI. 12”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Search strategies were developed according to a-priori selection criteria for each clinical question.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For many aspects of PCOS, there is little or no evidence or the evidence is of poor quality, with other potential biases resulting from different methods for diagnosis of PCOS and differing end points.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The recommendations were formulated using a considered judgement process that took into account the amount and quality of available evidence as well as its generalisability and applicability to current practice in Australia.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The leading cause of burden of disease among Indigenous women in the NATSIHS was anxiety and depression, accounting for 10% of the burden. 51”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“data were extracted from included studies using a specially developed data extraction form, 57 and meta-analyses were performed where appropriate.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [57]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“All aspects of the guideline were developed as outlined in the NHMRC standards and procedures for externally developed guidelines, 55 and accordingly, the guideline was approved by the NHMRC in July 2011.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [55]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The optimal methodology for testosterone measurement on which to base calculated measurements is unclear; however, Davison and colleagues have described a highly sensitive direct manual radioimmunoassay in the Australian setting that more accurately measures total testosterone than other assays, and that provides reference values for androgens by age. 58”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“During the second year, hormonal profiles are similar to control-group adult women during both phases of the menstrual cycle, although progesterone levels remain lower. 63”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [63] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For diagnosis of PCOS, calculated bioavailable and free testosterone were better than androstenedione, SHBG and total testosterone levels, and the FAI was better than androstenedione and SHBG levels. 61”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [61] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The average adult menstrual cycle is 28 days, with a normal cycle range of 24 to 35 days. 64”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [64]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“PCOS is diagnosed based on at least two of: oligo- or anovulation, hyperandrogenism (clinical and/or biochemical) and polycystic ovaries on ultrasound after exclusion (where relevant) of other conditions such as thyroid dysfunction, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, hyperprolactinaemia, androgen-secreting tumours and Cushing syndrome (Figure 2). 14”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In approving the full version of the guideline, the NHMRC is satisfied that it is based on the systematic identification and synthesis of the best available scientific evidence and makes clear recommendations for health professionals practising in an Australian health care setting.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Between the ages of 2 and 9 years, the size and morphology of the ovaries are relatively stable, with the volume of each ovary being less than 2 cm 3 ; however, from around 9 years of age onward, the ovaries undergo progressive increases in size. 70”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [70] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Of girls who begin menses at before 12 years of age, between 12 and 13 years, and after 13 years of age, 50% of cycles are ovulatory by 1 year, 3 years, and 4.5 years, respectively. 69”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [69] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Original NIH criteria based on ovulatory disturbance and hyperandrogenism may be the optimal way to diagnose PCOS in adolescents.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Elements of a successful collaboration include 'a willingness to collaborate, trust in each other, mutual respect and communication'. 74”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [74] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Successful collaboration also relies on adequate systems and organisational supports. 75”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [75] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The number of large antral follicles and ovarian size reaches its maximum around the time of menarche 71,72”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One level III3 case-control study with moderate risk of bias 73 was identified by our search to answer the question, and was deemed insufficient evidence on which to base a recommendation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is a high prevalence of polycystic ovaries among adolescents, and normal reference ranges for this age group have not been developed or validated.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In PCOS, other novel CVD risk factors, premature cardiovascular dysfunction and subclinical CVD 29,30,83 have been noted and are related to IR and obesity. 84-89”
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Women with PCOS often have increased cardiovascular risk factors (hyperinsulinaemia, dyslipidaemia, hypertension) and increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome 81”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [81] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Women with PCOS have increased Finnish Diabetes Risk Scores as well as increased risk of gestational diabetes, 24 prediabetes and DM2 11,103 - independent of, but exacerbated by, obesity.”
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Earlier-onset hyperglycaemia and rapid progression to DM2 is also reported in PCOS. 104,105”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“IR is a key aetiological feature in PCOS, worsening the reproductive and metabolic features, type 2 diabetes and CVD risk. 30,99,100”
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In contrast, Shaw and colleagues examined a subset of postmen-pausal women from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation study who had displayed clinical features consistent with PCOS and confirmed increased cardiovascular events and deaths. 22”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“We did not identify high-quality PCOS-specific evidence to answer the question, hence a clinical consensus recommendation was made based on clinical expertise, an international position statement on CVD risk assessment in PCOS 78 and on national guidelines on absolute CVD risk assessment, 46 management of obesity, 54 lipids 77,79 and hypertension 80 for the general population.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [78] source
- Not checked yetcites [46]
- Not checked yetcites [54]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“We identified one low-quality systematic review (level I) with high risk of bias; 108 however, this was deemed insufficient evidence on which to base the recommendation.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [108] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Body image is generally poor in women, yet negative body image is more prevalent among women with PCOS and affects thoughts and feelings about health and appearance, QoL, mood and physical fitness. 114,115”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [114] source
- Not checked yetcites [115]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Screening may uncover undiagnosed mood disorders with resource implications including increasing consultation duration.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: It is not usual practice to screen women with PCOS for depression and/or anxiety.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The significantly increased risk of DM2 in PCOS represents a major health and economic burden.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Prevalence of anxiety among women with PCOS ranges from 34% 113 to 57%; 5 again, higher than in the general population (18%). 111”
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Assessment of depression and/or anxiety for women with PCOS is important, as recognition and treatment improves emotional wellbeing and QoL (Figure 6) and is likely to improve effectiveness of lifestyle intervention in PCOS.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Mood also adversely affects overall QoL.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The recommendation to screen all women with PCOS and to use an OGTT will result in earlier detection of prediabetes and DM2, and will present opportunities for prevention of DM2 and its complications, through effective lifestyle intervention, as outlined below.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Lifestyle therapy has been shown to prevent or delay progression to DM2.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Previous studies have noted that fasting blood glucose level alone appears to lack sensitivity in screening for prediabetes or DM2 in PCOS, with national and international groups recommending screening all women with PCOS with an OGTT. 78,107”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“with high rates of associated mood disorders; 62% had major depression and 41% anxiety disorders.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [124] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is likely that improved screening practices will increase identification of disordered eating/eating disorders”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: It is not usual practice to screen women with PCOS for disordered eating.
In the paper
“The prevalence of any eating disorder has been reported at 21% in PCOS, 124”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [124] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Australian research suggests that prevalence of diagnosable eating disorders is increasing. 118”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Women with PCOS also report less sexual satisfaction and lower sexual self-worth than women without PCOS”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [134]
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There is a large number of small, uncontrolled trials demonstrating that weight loss achieved through lifestyle management decreases abdominal fat, hyperandrogenism and IR and improves lipid profiles, ovulation, menstrual cyclicity, fertility, risk factors for DM2 and CVD and psychological health in women with PCOS who are overweight. 137-140”
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, lifestyle management is useful for targeting weight loss and prevention of weight gain, and is first-line treatment for a large proportion of women with PCOS.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, although exercise has benefits for women with PCOS who are overweight, the evidence is limited, inconsistent and of low quality.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Pharmacological therapy i n cl u di ng clomiphene citrate, metformin and gonadotrophins are available and effective in improving fertility in women with PCOS. 208”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [208]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There was no difference between aerobic exercise and aerobic-resistance exercise for percent of body fat, fat mass, fat-free mass, depression scores and PCOS-related QoL. 140,192”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, this study is only published in abstract form, informing the guideline development group but not included in the evidence review.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“however, with small sample size and inadequate power, this cannot inform a recommendation in isolation.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“given the similar efficacy of lifestyle and pharmacological therapy overall, the guideline development group deemed clear benefits in using lifestyle interventions over pharmacological interventions for firstline management of infertility among women with PCOS.”
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The evidence is generalisable to the patient population in terms of age and BMI and was completed in multiple countries; however, it may not be generalisable to Indigenous populations.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Clomiphene citrate is a selective oestrogen receptor modulator with both oestrogenic and antioestrogenic properties. 216”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [216] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“It inhibits oestradiol receptors binding in the hypothalamus and pituitary, blocking negative feedback. This hypothalamus release from negative inhibition increases gonadotrophinreleasing hormone, which in turn increases FSH and stimulates follicular growth and ovulation. 217”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [217] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One systematic review and one RCT were identified by our search.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The evidence is generalisable to patient populations in terms of age and BMI and applicability in Australia, but may not be relevant to Indigenous populations.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Metformin has been used extensively in DM2, is the most studied in PCOS, and has the most reassuring safety profile. 222”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [222] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Gonadotrophins are often used as second-line therapy in anovulatory PCOS women with CCR; however, there is an increased risk of multiple pregnancy and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. 231”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [231]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Laparoscopic ovarian 'drilling' was first described in 1984 254 with minor variations developed subsequently; all are characterised by an altered endocrine profile following surgery.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [254] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The potential for teratogenic effects of letrozole has been raised, with an abstract suggesting higher risk of congenital cardiac and bone malformations in newborns. 240”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [240] source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These agents theoretically avoid adverse effects of clomiphene citrate, 238,239 as they do not affect oestrogen receptors centrally or thin the endometrium. 237”
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Aromatase converts androgens to oestrogens, and aromatase inhibitors therefore inhibit oestrogen biosynthesis, interfering with hypothalamus/pituitary feedback, increasing FSH and causing ovarian follicle stimulation. 237”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [237] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Aromatase inhibitors were proposed as ovulation-inducing agents in 2001. 236”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [236] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“controversies, including whether PCOS is considered an obesity-related condition and may reduce BMI cut-offs, 271 need to be addressed. 270”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [271] source
- Not checked yetcites [270]
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Bariatric surgery has significant complications, including malabsorptive states, psychological issues, poor nutritional status, and disordered eating.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The RCT 261 included in the systematic review by Farquhar and colleagues conducted in New Zealand 255 may also be generalisable to Indigenous populations.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [261] source
- Not checked yetcites [255]
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It has been suggested that women with a BMI ⩾ 35kg/m 2 after failed attempts at weight loss for more than 1 year may consider bariatric surgery; however, surgical studies are generally poorly designed, 264”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [264] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The evidence was from multiple countries and may be generalisable to the patient population in terms of age and BMI.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“General international obesity guidelines 267 recommended consideration of bariatric surgery with a BMI ⩾ 35 kg/m 2 and one or more complications, which are expected to abate with weight reduction, after failure of a structured lifestyle intervention. Surgery can be considered after unsuccessful lifestyle intervention with a BMI ⩾ 40 kg/m 2 and can be first line with BMI ⩾ 50 kg/m 2 . 268”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [267]
- Not checked yetcites [268]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the 2009 American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology clinical practice guidelines do not currently recommend bariatric surgery for fertility treatment. 265”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [265]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Also, nutritional impact in pregnancy is unclear and although supplement use is widely recommended following bariatric surgery and for pregnant women, poor compliance is a problem. 269”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [269] source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A formal analysis of cost-effectiveness was not completed.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The guideline is based on the best evidence available up to November 2010.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In general populations, bariatric surgery is recommended for individuals with a BMI ⩾ 35 kg/m 2 and the presence of comorbid conditions that are expected to improve significantly with weight reduction. 267,270”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [267]
- Not checked yetcites [270]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All recommendations are limited by their applicability and generalisability”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We did not identify any PCOS-specific evidence to inform this recommendation and a c l i n i c a l c on se nsu s recommendation has been made using the clinical expertise of the multidisciplinary guideline development group, informed by existing evidence-based clinical guidelines for bariatric surgery in the general population.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, it was concluded that general population evidence-based recommendations for bariatric surgery are applicable to this evidence review and patient population.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: PCOS is a comorbid condition that improves significantly with weight reduction and is strongly associated with other comorbidities including DM2 and increased CVD risk.
The paper relies on this without support.
There is little focus on lifestyle and prevention in PCOS, with most services targeting infertility and costly assisted reproductive technology.
“there is little focus on lifestyle and prevention, with most services targeting infertility and costly assisted reproductive technology.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Lifestyle change and metformin improve insulin resistance in PCOS.
“lifestyle change and metformin improve IR in PCOS”
The paper relies on this without support.
Among other at-risk groups, lifestyle change and metformin dramatically reduce progression to diabetes.
“among other at-risk groups these measures have been shown to dramatically reduce progression to diabetes”
The paper relies on this without support.
The pathophysiology of PCOS remains unclear.
“PCOS is an endocrine disorder, the pathophysiology of which remains unclear.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Obesity affects psychological features of PCOS.
“while obesity also affects psychological features of PCOS.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Optimal approaches to screening and assessment of psychological functioning in PCOS are unknown and recognition is generally poor.
“Optimal approaches to screening and assessment of psychological functioning in PCOS are unknown and recognition is generally poor”
The paper relies on this without support.
Fertility is not necessarily impaired in all PCOS cases; some women conceive without medical intervention, depending on the severity of the condition.
“A key point is that fertility is not necessarily impaired in all PCOS cases - some women conceive without medical intervention, depending on the severity of the condition.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Obesity or excess weight is a major cause of chronic disease in Western countries.
“Obesity or excess weight is a major cause of chronic disease in Western countries.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Poor body image, sexual dysfunction, disordered eating and eating disorders are all more common among women with PCOS.
“recognition of other aspects of emotional wellbeing, including poor body image, sexual dysfunction, disordered eating and eating disorders - all more common among women with PCOS - is important for improving QoL.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Insulin resistance and obesity have a putative aetiological role in PCOS.
“Given the putative aetiological role of IR and obesity in PCOS, prevention of weight gain is important across the life span.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Access to culturally appropriate care, services and programs is currently not optimal.
“Access to culturally appropriate care, services and programs is currently not optimal.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a lack of awareness of PCOS among consumers and health professionals.
“there is a lack of awareness of PCOS among consumers and health professionals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no guidance on the assessment and management of PCOS among Indigenous women, nor any adaptation for the Australian context.
“There is no guidance on the assessment and management of PCOS among Indigenous women, nor any adaptation for the Australian context.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Optimal approaches to screening and assessment of emotional wellbeing among women with PCOS remain unclear.
“Optimal approaches to screening and assessment of emotional wellbeing among women with PCOS remain unclear and are also addressed in this guideline (Section 4).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Optimal methods for achieving weight loss and prevention of weight gain remain unclear.
“Optimal methods for achieving weight loss and prevention of weight gain remain unclear and are a focus of this guideline (Section 5).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Short-term diets rarely lead to permanent weight loss, and lifestyle change requires behavioural change.
“Short-term diets rarely lead to permanent weight loss, and lifestyle change requires behavioural change.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Little is known about the prevalence of eating disorders and disordered eating among Indigenous women.
“Little is known about the prevalence of eating disorders and disordered eating among Indigenous women.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Social and cultural factors influence emotional wellbeing, and the challenges facing many Indigenous women are likely to amplify the impact of PCOS on emotional wellbeing.
“Social and cultural factors influence emotional wellbeing, and the challenges facing many Indigenous women are likely to amplify the impact of PCOS on emotional wellbeing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The role of ultrasound in the Indigenous setting is questionable due to limitations in care and access to ultrasound facilities and service provision in rural and remote locations.
“the role of ultrasound in the Indigenous setting is questionable due to limitations in care and access to ultrasound facilities and service provision in rural and remote locations”
The paper relies on this without support.
There may be cultural factors and potential issues around acceptability of bariatric surgery.
“there may be cultural factors and potential issues around acceptability of bariatric surgery.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Different laboratories currently use different methodologies for androgen measurement.
“Because different laboratories currently use different methodologies, specific cut-off values to determine hyperandrogenism cannot be recommended”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current practice in androgen measurement in PCOS is unclear.
“Current practice in androgen measurement in PCOS is unclear, so the recommendation may require changes in usual care.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The cost of a calculated testosterone test involves measurement of testosterone and SHBG levels, and this test is more expensive than a testosterone level alone.
“There may be resource implications, as the cost of a calculated testosterone test involves measurement of testosterone and SHBG levels, and this test is more expensive than a testosterone level alone.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the first postmenarcheal year, around half of cycles are anovulatory.
“In the first postmenarcheal year, around half of cycles are anovulatory.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Weight and exercise influence the menstrual cycle of women in many ways.
“Weight and exercise influence the menstrual cycle of women in many ways and should always be evaluated when assessing a women with menstrual disturbance.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is likely that current practice involves prescription of the oral contraceptive pill without diagnosis of PCOS in adolescents with irregular cycles.
“It is likely that current practice involves prescription of the oral contraceptive pill without diagnosis of PCOS in adolescents with irregular cycles.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most women with PCOS do not adequately access the relevant health disciplines, and when they do it is usually via a GP referral to separate multidisciplinary health professionals, with limited communication and limited engagement and carriage of the care plan by the patient.
“It appears that most women with PCOS do not adequately access these disciplines, and when they do it is usually via a GP referral to separate multidisciplinary health professionals, with communication between health professionals and limited engagement and carriage of the care plan by the patient with PCOS.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A multidisciplinary approach has been credited with improvements in health-related behaviours, health parameters and general wellbeing.
“A multidisciplinary approach has been credited with improvements in health-related behaviours, health parameters and general wellbeing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Limitations of the multidisciplinary care model include compartmentalisation of patient care and limited communication between health professionals.
“However, limitations of the multidisciplinary care model include compartmentalisation of patient care and limited communication between health professionals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current PCOS management involves one or more health professionals managing individual components of the syndrome.
“Current PCOS management involves one or more health professionals managing individual components of the syndrome (Figure 4).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current Australian funding arrangements may hinder community-based interdisciplinary care.
“Current Australian funding arrangements may hinder community-based interdisciplinary care.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Medicare funding for allied health professionals is capped.
“Medicare funding for allied health professionals is capped”
The paper relies on this without support.
PCOS management often focuses on reproductive features and CVD risk is often not considered.
“PCOS management often focuses on reproductive features and CVD risk is often not considered.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Lifestyle therapy has been shown to prevent or delay progression to DM2.
“Furthermore, lifestyle therapy has been shown to prevent or delay progression to DM2.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Assessment of IR or measurement of serum insulin levels has no current role in clinically assessing for risk of DM2.
“It is important to note that assessment of IR or measurement of serum insulin levels has no current role in clinically assessing for risk of DM2.”
The paper relies on this without support.
OGTTs increase inconvenience for patients, which may affect compliance.
“However, it is acknowledged that OGTTs increase inconvenience for patients, which may affect compliance.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Contributing factors for mood disorders in PCOS remain controversial but include clinical symptoms of PCOS, excess weight, and the chronic and complex nature of PCOS.
“Contributing factors remain controversial, but include clinical symptoms of PCOS, excess weight, and the chronic and complex nature of PCOS.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Mood also adversely affects overall QoL.
“Mood also adversely affects overall QoL.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is not usual practice to screen women with PCOS for depression and/or anxiety.
“However, it is not usual practice to screen women with PCOS for depression and/or anxiety.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Physical factors affecting appearance (excess weight and hirsutism), psychological factors (self-esteem) and sociocultural factors can influence body image.
“Physical factors affecting appearance (excess weight and hirsutism), psychological (self-esteem) and sociocultural factors can influence body image.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Body image is often not considered in PCOS.
“However, body image is often not considered in PCOS; hence, this area was prioritised during the process of guideline development.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is not usual practice to screen women with PCOS for disordered eating.
“It is not usual practice to screen women with PCOS for disordered eating.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is not usual practice to screen and assess women with PCOS for psychosexual dysfunction.
“It is not usual practice to screen and assess women with PCOS for psychosexual dysfunction”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current practice is unclear regarding face-to-face tailored dietary advice for women with PCOS.
“Current practice is unclear.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most practitioners do not recommend specific dietary composition for women with PCOS.
“Most practitioners do not recommend specific dietary composition”
The paper relies on this without support.
Consumer-targeted marketing claims benefits for specific macronutrient composition in PCOS.
“However, consumer-targeted marketing claims benefits for specific macronutrient composition in PCOS”
The paper relies on this without support.
Morbid obesity (BMI >=35) increases risks during pregnancy.
“Morbid obesity (body mass index ⩾ 35kg/m 2 ) increases risks during pregnancy”
The paper relies on this without support.
Fertility rates are lower among women with a BMI >=30-32 kg/m2.
“Fertility rates are lower among women with a BMI ⩾ 30-32 kg/m 2”
The paper relies on this without support.
Lifestyle intervention benefits extend well beyond fertility and include DM2 prevention.
“lifestyle intervention benefits extend well beyond fertility and include DM2 prevention.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Studies with clomiphene citrate show ovulation rates of 60%-85% and pregnancy rates of 30%-50% after six ovulatory cycles.
“Studies with clomiphene citrate show ovulation rates of 60%-85% and pregnancy rates of 30%50% after six ovulatory cycles.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The discrepancy between ovulation rates and pregnancy rates with clomiphene citrate is attributed to anti-oestrogenic clomiphene citrate effects.
“The discrepancy between ovulation rates and pregnancy rates has been attributed to anti-oestrogenic clomiphene citrate effects.”
The paper relies on this without support.
IR leading to hyperinsulinaemia increases ovarian androgen biosynthesis and decreases SHBG synthesis, further increasing free androgens.
“IR leading to hyperinsulinaemia increases ovarian androgen biosynthesis and decreased SHBG synthesis, further increasing free androgens.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Excess androgens and insulin cause premature follicular atresia and anovulation.
“Excess androgens and insulin cause premature follicular atresia and anovulation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Metformin may be associated with mild gastrointestinal adverse events.
“Metformin may be associated with mild gastrointestinal adverse events”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ovulation induction with gonadotrophins is expensive and requires regular monitoring, with risks of multiple pregnancy and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.
“In contrast, ovulation induction with gonadotrophins is expensive and requires regular monitoring, with risks of multiple pregnancy and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Weight loss improves fertility and addresses maternal and neonatal complications associated with obesity, potentially also increasing the safety and effectiveness of ovulation induction.
“Weight loss improves fertility and addresses maternal and neonatal complications associated with obesity, potentially also increasing the safety and effectiveness of ovulation induction.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Eating disorders are already relatively common among women with PCOS.
“Eating disorders are already relatively common among women with PCOS.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Among people with morbid obesity, lifestyle interventions have very limited efficacy.
“Overall, among people with morbid obesity, lifestyle interventions have very limited efficacy”
The paper relies on this without support.
Bariatric surgery has substantial efficacy for women who are severely obese, including in women with PCOS.
“given the substantial efficacy of bariatric surgery for women who are severely obese, including in women with PCOS”
The paper relies on this without support.
PCOS is a comorbid condition that improves significantly with weight reduction and is strongly associated with other comorbidities including DM2 and increased CVD risk.
“PCOS is a comorbid condition that improves significantly with weight reduction and is strongly associated with other comorbidities including DM2 and increased CVD risk.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current practice is unclear, although few women with PCOS are likely to be having bariatric surgery.
“Current practice is unclear, although few women with PCOS are likely to be having this surgery.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ethnic differences in obesity and complications are recognised and cut-off points for surgery may need to be adjusted for those at high risk.
“Ethnic differences in obesity and complications are recognised and cut-off points for surgery may need to be adjusted for those at high risk.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Polycystic ovary syndrome is a diagnosis of exclusion.
“As polycystic ovary syndrome isa diagnosis of exclusion, other causes of irregular cycles (such as thyroid dysfunction or”
The paper relies on this without support.
Achievable goals (5% to 0% loss of body weight in overweight women) yield significant clinical improvements.
“Key messages should be reinforced with women with PCOS, including that achievable goals (5% to 0% loss of body weight in overweight women ield sinificant clinical improvements.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The most consistently observed androgenic abnormality in PCOS is elevated 'free testosterone' or calculated free androgen index, which includes SHBG in the equation (Teede et al., 2011).”
From Insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of euglycaemic–hyperinsulinaemic clamp studies (2016) · cites this paper as Teede et al., 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Based on current guidelines, metformin is indicated in PCOS in some scenarios to improve fertility (Teede et al. , 2011; Legro et al. , 2013), for management of menstrual irregularity if women are unable to take OCPs, and in co-existent prediabetes or DM2, where lifestyle modification fails (Legro et al. , 2013).”
From Metformin and lifestyle modification in polycystic ovary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis (2015) · cites this paper as Teede et al., 2011
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Lifestyle management is first line therapy in PCOS for prevention of weight gain and for weight loss (Teede et al. , 2011).”
From Metformin and lifestyle modification in polycystic ovary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis (2015) · cites this paper as Teede et al., 2011
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Given these challenges, comprehensive care for PCOS in a multidisciplinary setting is widely advocated, but not received by most women (12, 22, 27).”
From Delayed Diagnosis and a Lack of Information Associated With Dissatisfaction in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Prevention of weight gain is recommended in PCOS position statements and guidelines (12, 29) and is more feasible at the individual level than weight loss (30).”
From Delayed Diagnosis and a Lack of Information Associated With Dissatisfaction in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“Weight loss, in turn, improves all the features of PCOS, and lifestyle (diet, physical activity and behavior) changes and weight management are recommended as first line treatment for PCOS [21,22]”
From Weight management interventions in women with and without PCOS: a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cites
11 retracted
Psychological interventions for overweight or obesity
Shaw, K. A., O'Rourke, P., Del Mar, C., & Kenardy, J. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003818.pub2 · Cited by 442
RetractedShaw, L. J., Bairey Merz, C. N., Azziz, R., Stanczyk, F. Z., Sopko, G., Braunstein, G. D., Kelsey, S. F., Kip, K. E., Cooper-DeHoff, R. M., Johnson, B. D., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2007-0425 · Cited by 427
RetractedBadawy, A., Aal, I. A., & Abulatta, M. (2007) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.02.062 · Cited by 133
RetractedAdvice on low-fat diets for obesity
Pirozzo, S., Summerbell, C., Cameron, C. M., & Glasziou, P. (2002) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003640 · Cited by 92
RetractedNugent, D., Vanderkerchove, P., Hughes, E. G., Arnot, M., & Lilford, R. J. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000410.pub2 · Cited by 80
RetractedNugent, D., Vanderkerchove, P., Hughes, E. G., Arnot, M., & Lilford, R. J. (2000) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000410 · Cited by 78
RetractedBadawy, A., Mosbah, A., & Shady, M. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.010 · Cited by 76
RetractedHashim, H. A., Shokeir, T. A., & Badawy, A. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.985 · Cited by 63
RetractedKazerooni, T., Ghaffarpasand, F., Kazerooni, Y., Kazerooni, M., & Setoodeh, S. (2009) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.04.022 · Cited by 47
RetractedBadawy, A., Mosbah, A., Tharwat, A., & Eid, M. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.065 · Cited by 45
Retracted
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 2011, Evidence‐based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome
- Boyle J, 2011, Polycystic ovary syndrome and associated metabolic features in Indigenous women in the Northern Territory [PhD thesis]
- Teede H, 2008, Check: Independent learning program for GPs. Polycystic ovary syndrome
- Zawadaki R, 1992, Current issues in endocrinology and metabolism: polycystic ovary syndrome, 377
- Women's Health Australia, 2005, The Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Australian women and their weight — a growing problem
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2006, Australia's health 2006: the tenth biannual health report of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
- American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Text revision
- Australian Medical Association, 2009, Body image and health — 2002. Revised 2009 [position statement]
- beyondblue, 2011, Clinical practice guidelines: depression in adolescents and young adults
- National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2006, Obsessive–compulsive disorder: core interventions in the treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder and body dysmorphic disorder
- National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2004, Eating disorders: core interventions in the treatment and management of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and related eating disorders
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2009, Depression: the treatment and management of depression in adults
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2011, Management of generalised anxiety disorder and panic disorder (with or without agoraphobia) in adults: management in primary, secondary and community care
- National Health and Medical Research Council, 2001, National evidence based guidelines for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus
- National Vascular Disease Prevention Alliance, 2009, Guidelines for the assessment of absolute cardiovascular disease risk
- Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2005, National and Torres Strait Islander health survey 2004–05
- National Health and Medical Research Council, 2004, Clinical practice guidelines for the management of overweight and obesity in adults
- National Health and Medical Research Council, 2007, NHMRC standards and procedures for externally developed guidelines
- National Health and Medical Research Council, 2009, NHMRC levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines
- Southern Health Centre for Clinical Effectiveness, 2010, Critical appraisal templates
- National Heart Foundation of Australia; Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, 2001, Lipid management guidelines 2001 — summary paper, Med J Aust, 175, S57
- National Blood Pressure and Vascular Disease Advisory Committee, 2010, Guide to management of hypertension 2008. Updated 2010
- Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2010, Causes of death
- World Health Organization, 2005, Preventing chronic diseases: a vital investment: WHO global report
- Geiss L, 1995, Diabetes in America, 233
- Colagiuri S, 2009, National evidence based guideline for case detection and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
- Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2008, ABS National Survey of Mental Health Wellbeing: summary of results, 2007
- DeeksA Gibson‐HelmM TeedeH.Negative body image and lower self‐efficacy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.Proceedings of the Australian Society for Behavioural Health and Medicine 8th Annual Scientific Conference; 2010; Feb 10‐12; Brisbane.
- American College of Sports Medicine; American Heart Association, 2007, Physical activity and public health guidelines
- Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2010, National physical activity guidelines
- Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee, 2008, Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee report 2008
- World Health Organization, 2007, A guide for population‐based approaches to increasing levels of physical activity: implementation of the WHO global strategy on diet, physical activity and health
- Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2008, C‐Gyn 2: ovarian stimulation in infertility
- Macklon N, 2002, Ovulation induction [European practice in obstetrics and gynaecology series]
- HomburgR HendriksM KonigT et al.Clomifene or low dose FSH for the first line treatment of anovulatory PCOS: a prospective randomised multinational study (COFFI) [oral abstract O‐058].Conference of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; 2009; Amsterdam.
- American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009, Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician‐gynecologists
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2006, NICE clinical guideline 43
- Mechanick JI, 2009, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery medical guidelines for clinical practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient, Obesity (Silver Spring), 17, S1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Diagnosis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome during Adolescence
Witchel, S. F., Oberfield, S., Rosenfield, R. L., Codner, E., Bonny, A., Ibáñez, L., Pena, A., Horikawa, R., Gomez-Lobo, V., Joel, D., et al. (2015) · Hormone Research in Paediatrics · doi:10.1159/000375530 · Cited by 3,113
Legro, R. S., Arslanian, S. A., Ehrmann, D. A., Hoeger, K. M., Murad, M. H., Pasquali, R., & Welt, C. K. (2013) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2013-2350 · Cited by 1,919
“Other national guidelines have favored metformin more than in the current guidelines (252).”
BackgroundAzziz, R., Carmina, E., Chen, Z., Dunaif, A., Laven, J. S. E., Legro, R. S., Lizneva, D., Natterson-Horowtiz, B., Teede, H. J., & Yildiz, B. O. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.57 · Cited by 2,005
Self-citationTeede, H. J., Misso, M. L., Costello, M. F., Dokras, A., Laven, J., Moran, L., Piltonen, T., Norman, R. J., & the International PCOS Network (2018) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/cen.13795 · Cited by 1,823
Self-citationTeede, H. J., Misso, M. L., Costello, M. F., Dokras, A., Laven, J., Moran, L., Piltonen, T., Norman, R. J., International PCOS Network, Andersen, M., et al. (2018) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dey256 · Cited by 1,593
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Teede, H. J., Misso, M. L., Deeks, A. A., Moran, L. J., Stuckey, B. G. A., Wong, J. L. A., Norman, R. J., Costello, M. F., & Groups, O. B. O. T. G. D.
- Affiliations
- Jean Hailes (AU)
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Department of Diabetes, Southern Health, Melbourne, VIC.
- Royal Hospital for Women (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Teede, Helena J
- ORCID
- Venue
- Medical Journal of Australia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 195
- Issue
- S6
- Pages
- S65-112
- ISSN
- 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
- 1326-5377
- OpenAlex
- W2054117560
- Semantic Scholar
- 1afdab50cfe1ae8b3d69f93a21d9ec538b032a8b
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 240
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 22.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Keywords
- polycystic ovary syndrome, diagnosis, management, evidence-based care, infertility, hyperandrogenism, insulin resistance
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Australia, Depression, Female, Humans, Life Style, Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Body Mass Index, Risk Assessment, Evidence-Based Medicine, Overweight
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review