Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4,766

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary

Levin, H. S.·1993·Archives of Neurology
DOI 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540050007005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This volume is a compilation of the neuropsychological tests currently used by the authors and their colleagues at the University of Victoria (Melbourne, Australia) Neuropsychology Laboratory. As pointed out by the authors (and well known to clinical neuropsychologists), many of the procedures currently in use were originally developed for other purposes and consequently lack a published manual containing substantial normative data. With the exception of approximately 12 commercially published tests of general intellectual ability, scholastic achievement, and memory, there are multiple (and sometimes obscure) sources of normative data for many neuropsychological tests in use. Numerous tables of normative data not available in published test manuals are reproduced in this volume. Consequently, publication of this compendium is especially timely and informative. Although the scope of the book reflects the authors' flexible, individualized approach to neuropsychological assessment, they include tests that are components of widely used batteries. Organized by the domain of

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540050007005

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Items 101–196 of 196

Metadata

Authors
Levin, H. S.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
1993-05-01
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
451-451
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/archneur.1993.00540050007005
OpenAlex
W2001045706
Cited by
4,766
References
0
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.