Cited by 411Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 213 of the 259 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 308 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Development of large-scale functional networks from birth to adulthood: A guide to the neuroimaging literature

Open access

Abstract

The development of human cognition results from the emergence of coordinated activity between distant brain areas. Network science, combined with non-invasive functional imaging, has generated unprecedented insights regarding the adult brain's functional organization, and promises to help elucidate the development of functional architectures supporting complex behavior. Here we review what is known about functional network development from birth until adulthood, particularly as understood through the use of resting-state functional connectivity MRI (rs-fcMRI). We attempt to synthesize rs-fcMRI findings with other functional imaging techniques, with macro-scale structural connectivity, and with knowledge regarding the development of micro-scale structure. We highlight a number of outstanding conceptual and technical barriers that need to be addressed, as well as previous developmental findings that may need to be revisited. Finally, we discuss key areas ripe for future research in order to (1) better characterize normative developmental trajectories, (2) link these trajectories to biologic mechanistic events, as well as component behaviors and (3) better understand the clinical implications and pathophysiological basis of aberrant network development.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.079

Cites

213 of 213 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

1 of 308 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 118 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 56
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 11
65 of 65
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Coordinated activity across distant brain regions is fundamental to human brain function.

    “Coordinated neuronal activity between anatomically disparate regions is an essential feature of human brain function.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The functional connectivity measures used in the reviewed studies reflect neural connectivity rather than non-neural artifacts.

    “A crucial caveat to the above observations is the potential for unidentified sources of artifact in infant studies”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Developmental trajectories observed in cross-sectional studies reflect true longitudinal development.

    “Many of the network changes seen during infancy reflect long-term trajectories that extend into childhood and adolescence.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Adult network organization is a valid reference for assessing infant and child network maturity.

    “Indeed, there are now at least 3 reports that suggest the network structure in children as defined by community detection (see Figure 3) are largely similar to the adult (Fair et al., 2012b; Marek et al., 2015; Power et al., 2012).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The studies reviewed are sufficiently comparable to synthesize trends across them.

    “Taken together, these studies point towards several trends that are consistent with results from seed and component based approaches”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Microscale architectural features such as gene expression and receptor densities evolve with age.

    “and undoubtedly evolve with age.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Motion tends to be greater in patient populations and younger children.

    “Motion tends to be greater in patient populations and younger children, posing a fundamentally important challenge for developmental research.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Even less is known about the stability of areal parcellations at younger ages.

    “and even less known about the stability of these parcellations at younger ages.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cortical folding patterns change continually from birth into adulthood, especially during infancy.

    “Cortical folding patterns change continually from birth into adulthood, and especially during infancy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Infancy is a time during which image contrasts in various MR acquisitions change dramatically.

    “Infancy is also a time during which the image contrasts in various MR acquisitions changes dramatically.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Invasive tract-tracer injections remain the gold standard for identifying and quantifying interareal connection weights.

    “Invasive tract-tracer injections, a method that is only feasible in animal models, remains the “gold standard” for identifying and quantifying interareal connection weights.”
11 of 11

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 259 references

46 of the 259 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Baker, 2014, Disruption of cortical association networks in schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder, JAMA Psychiatry, 71, 109, 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.3469 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Burgess, 2016, Evaluation of denoising strategies to address motion-correlated artifacts in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from the human connectome project, Brain Connect, 6, 669, 10.1089/brain.2016.0435 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Calabrese, 2015, A diffusion MRI tractography connectome of the mouse brain and comparison with neuronal tracer data, Cereb. Cortex, 25, 4628, 10.1093/cercor/bhv121 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Castellanos, 2016, Intrinsic functional connectivity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a science in development, Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging, 1, 253
  5. Cohen, 2016, The segregation and integration of distinct brain networks and their relationship to cognition, J. Neurosci., 36, 12083, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2965-15.2016 · DOI
  6. Collin, 2013, Structural and functional aspects relating to cost and benefit of rich club organization in the human cerebral cortex, Cereb. Cortex
  7. Donahue, 2016, Using diffusion tractography to predict cortical connection strength and distance: a quantitative comparison with tracers in the monkey, J. Neurosci., 36, 6758, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0493-16.2016 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Eggebrecht, 2017, Joint attention and brain functional connectivity in infants and toddlers, Cereb. Cortex, 10.1093/cercor/bhw403 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Fischl, 2012, FreeSurfer, NeuroImage, 62, 774, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Fuster, 2002, Frontal lobe and cognitive development, J. Neurocytol., 31, 373, 10.1023/A:1024190429920 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gao, 2013, The synchronization within and interaction between the default and dorsal attention networks in early infancy, Cereb. Cortex, 23, 594, 10.1093/cercor/bhs043 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gao, 2016, Functional connectivity of the infant human brain: plastic and modifiable, Neuroscientist
  13. Glasser, 2016, The Human Connectome Project's neuroimaging approach, Nat. Neurosci., 19, 1175, 10.1038/nn.4361 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hindriks, 2016, Can sliding-window correlations reveal dynamic functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI?, NeuroImage, 127, 242, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.055 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Honey, 2009, Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 2035, 10.1073/pnas.0811168106 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hwang, 2013, The development of hub architecture in the human functional brain network, Cereb. Cortex, 23, 2380, 10.1093/cercor/bhs227 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kessler, 2016, Brain oscillations and connectivity in autism spectrum disorders (ASD): new approaches to methodology, measurement and modelling, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 71, 601, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Laumann, 2016, On the stability of BOLD fMRI correlations, Cereb. Cortex, 10.1093/cercor/bhw265 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Marquand, 2016, Beyond lumping and splitting: a review of computational approaches for stratifying psychiatric disorders, Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging, 1, 433
  20. Marusak, 2016, Dynamic functional connectivity of neurocognitive networks in children, Hum. Brain Mapp.
  21. Patriat, 2016, An improved model of motion-related signal changes in fMRI, NeuroImage
  22. Power, 2016, Sources and implications of whole-brain fMRI signals in humans, NeuroImage
  23. Roalf, 2016, The impact of quality assurance assessment on diffusion tensor imaging outcomes in a large-scale population-based cohort, NeuroImage, 125, 903, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.068 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Rubinov, 2010, Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations, NeuroImage, 52, 1059, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Savalia, 2017, Motion-related artifacts in structural brain images revealed with independent estimates of in-scanner head motion, Hum. Brain Mapp., 38, 472, 10.1002/hbm.23397 · DOI
  26. Scheinost, 2016, Does prenatal stress alter the developing connectome?, Pediatr. Res.
  27. Siegel, 2016, Data quality influences observed links between functional connectivity and behavior, Cereb. Cortex
  28. Turk, 2016, Cortical chemoarchitecture shapes macroscale effective functional connectivity patterns in macaque cerebral cortex, Hum. Brain Mapp., 37, 1856, 10.1002/hbm.23141 · DOI · Paper page
  29. van den Heuvel, 2016, Multimodal analysis of cortical chemoarchitecture and macroscale fMRI resting-state functional connectivity, Hum. Brain Mapp., 37, 3103, 10.1002/hbm.23229 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–103 of 103

Metadata

Authors
Grayson, D. S., & Fair, D. A.
Affiliations
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Fair, Damien A.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
160
Pages
15-31
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2585998010
Cited by
411
References
259
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 8
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Autism Speaks Dennis Weatherstone Predoctoral Fellowship (9591)
  • DeStefano Family Foundation
  • Gates Foundation
  • MacArthur foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (UG3 OD023349, R01 MH105538, R01 MH096773, R01MH107508, P60-AA010760, R01 MH086654, R00MH091238)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
functional brain networks, developmental trajectories, resting-state functional connectivity, structural connectivity, cognitive development, network science
MeSH terms
Brain, Cognition, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neural Pathways, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review