The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies?
Abstract
Persuading users to adopt new information technologies persists as an important problem confronting those responsible for implementing new information systems. In order to better understand and manage the process of new technology adoption, several theoretical models have been proposed, of which the technology acceptance model (TAM) has gained considerable support. Beliefs and attitudes represent significant constructs in TAM. A parallel research stream suggests that individual difference factors are important in information technology acceptance but does not explicate the process by which acceptance is influenced. The objective of this paper is to clarify this process by proposing a theoretical model wherein the relationship between individual differences and IT acceptance is hypothesized to be mediated by the constructs of the technology acceptance model. In essence then, these factors are viewed as influencing an individual's beliefs about an information technology innovation; this relationship is further supported by drawing upon extensive research in learning. The theoretical model was tested in an empirical study of 230 users of an information technology innovation. Results confirm the basic structure of the model, including the mediating role of beliefs. Results also identify several individual difference variables that have significant effects on TAM's beliefs. Theoretical contributions and practical implications that follow are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249689 · Cited by 6,006
Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 · Cited by 5,718
Mathieson, K. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.173 · Cited by 4,216
A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x · Cited by 3,802
Research works printed but not linked: 61
- 10.2307/249577 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/019251 · DOI
- 10.2307/249703 · DOI · Paper page
- Bandura A., 1977, Social learning theory
- 10.2307/248940 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1984.tb01197.x · DOI
- 10.1002/9781118619179 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/249313 · DOI · Paper page
- Bower G. H., 1981, Theories of learning
- Browne M. W., 1993, Testing structural equation models, 136
- Burns T., 1961, The management of innovation
- 10.1287/isre.6.2.118 · DOI · Paper page
- Cronbach L. J., 1977, Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions
- 10.1006/imms.1993.1022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/07421222.1990.11517891 · DOI
- 10.2307/249510 · DOI
- DeSanctis G.(1982).An examination of an expectancy theory model of decision support system use. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Systems Ann Arbor MI 121–135.
- 10.1037/h0058371 · DOI · Paper page
- Fishbein M., 1967, Readings in attitude theory and measurement, 389
- Fishbein M., 1975, Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research
- Fuerst W. L., 1986, Factors affecting the perceived utilization of computer‐based decision support systems, Decision Sciences, 17, 329
- 10.1177/014920639201800307 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-188950-0.50008-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/07421222.1992.11517949 · DOI · Paper page
- Hoyle R., 1995, Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications, 158
- 10.1287/mnsc.29.5.567 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/07421222.1995.11518061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/014920638901500302 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01315.x · DOI · Paper page
- Jöreskog K. G., 1993, LISREL 8, User's reference guide
- Kerr E. B., 1988, Computer mediated communication systems: Status report
- Kwon T. H., 1987, Critical issues in information systems research, 88
- 10.2190/VEPG-500C-2AWM-1K15 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.25.8.787 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1988.tb00271.x · DOI
- 10.1145/255950.153574 · DOI
- McGeoch J. A., 1952, The psychology of human learning
- 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430 · DOI
- 10.2307/249311 · DOI
- 10.1016/0747-5632(86)90010-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Nunnally J. C., 1978, Psychometric theory
- 10.2307/249522 · DOI
- Pavlov I. P., 1941, Conditioned reflexes and psychiatry
- Pedhazur E. J., 1982, Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction
- 10.1145/29933.30856 · DOI
- Rogers E. M., 1995, Diffusion of innovations
- 10.2307/249275 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/10447319009525970 · DOI
- Sein M. K., 1987, Training end‐users to compute: Cognitive, motivational and social issues, INFOR, 25, 236
- Skinner B. F., 1969, Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis
- Soloway E., 1988, The nature of expertise
- 10.1037/h0042782 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0049124189018002003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/07421222.1994.11518035 · DOI · Paper page
- Triandis H. C., 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1979: Beliefs, Attitudes and Values, 195
- 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x · DOI
- West S. G., 1995, Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications, 57
- 10.2307/3151510 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.25.10.966 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.28.12.1421 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250951 · Cited by 4,726
Self-citationWhy do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003 · Cited by 2,906
The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.01250 · Cited by 2,572
Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0165 · Cited by 2,060
Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2001) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00978.x · Cited by 1,409
Vijayasarathy, L. R. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.011 · Cited by 1,218
Porter, C. E., & Donthu, N. (2006) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.003 · Cited by 1,066
Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers
Teo, T. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006 · Cited by 1,009
Hong, S., Thong, J. Y. L., & Tam, K. Y. (2006) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.03.009 · Cited by 955
The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China
van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001 · Cited by 940
An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment
Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Salam, A. F. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.010 · Cited by 922
Slade, E. L., Dwivedi, Y. K., Piercy, N. C., & Williams, M. D. (2015) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20823 · Cited by 922
Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance
Ong, C.-S., & Lai, J.-Y. (2006) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006 · Cited by 863
Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaptation1
Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneault, A. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148693 · Cited by 869
Hong, W., Thong, J. Y. L., Wong, W.-M., & Tam, K.-Y. (2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045692 · Cited by 827
Ahuja, M. K., & Bennett, J. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148691 · Cited by 818
Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations
Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu‐Nathan, T. S. (2015) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12042 · Cited by 791
An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use
Kwon, O., & Wen, Y. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.011 · Cited by 722
The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings
Ma, Q., & Liu, L. (2004) · Journal of Organizational and End User Computing · doi:10.4018/joeuc.2004010104 · Cited by 660
Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/17465660710834453 · Cited by 624
A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research
Hong, W., Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., Chasalow, L. C., & Dhillon, G. (2014) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0501 · Cited by 609
Personalization versus Customization: The Importance of Agency, Privacy, and Power Usage
Sundar, S. S., & Marathe, S. S. (2010) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01377.x · Cited by 588
It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model
Yang, H.-D., & Yoo, Y. (2004) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(03)00062-9 · Cited by 578
User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001 · Cited by 565
Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals
AGGELIDIS, V, & CHATZOGLOU, P. (2009) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.006 · Cited by 553
Integrating Technology Addiction and Use: an Empirical Investigation of Online Auction Users1
Turel, O., Serenko, A., & Giles, P. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409972 · Cited by 547
A meta-analysis of online trust relationships in e-commerce.
Kim, Y., & Peterson, R. A. (2017) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2017.01.001 · Cited by 541
Toward Meaningful Engagement: A Framework for Design and Research of Gamified Information Systems1
Liu, D., Santhanam, R., & Webster, J. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41.4.01 · Cited by 521
Min, S., So, K. K. F., & Jeong, M. (2019) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2018.1507866 · Cited by 489
Comparison of the middle-aged and older users’ adoption of mobile health services in China
Deng, Z., Mo, X., & Liu, S. (2014) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.12.002 · Cited by 435
A conceptual model for the process of IT innovation adoption in organizations
Hameed, M. A., Counsell, S., & Swift, S. (2012) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.03.007 · Cited by 442
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Aldraiweesh, A. A., Alamri, M. M., Aljarboa, N. A., Alturki, U., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2899368 · Cited by 435
Beyond usability: Designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety
Karsh, B.-T. (2004) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.010322 · Cited by 414
Acceptance of mobile banking framework in Pakistan
Afshan, S., & Sharif, A. (2016) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.09.005 · Cited by 376
Kim, T. G., Lee, J. H., & Law, R. (2008) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.016 · Cited by 369
THONG, J. Y. L., HONG, W., & TAM, K.-Y. (2002) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(02)91024-4 · Cited by 347
Swar, B., Hameed, T., & Reychav, I. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.068 · Cited by 334
Zhang, P. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.1.11 · Cited by 331
Investigating mobile wireless technology adoption: An extension of the technology acceptance model
Kim, S., & Garrison, G. (2009) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-008-9073-8 · Cited by 319
Pan, S., & Jordan-Marsh, M. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.015 · Cited by 300
Machine learning and human capital complementarities: Experimental evidence on bias mitigation
Choudhury, P., Starr, E., & Agarwal, R. (2020) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3152 · Cited by 293
Self-citationSharma, R., & Yetton, P. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148789 · Cited by 285
Five-factor model personality traits as predictors of perceived and actual usage of technology
Barnett, T., Pearson, A. W., Pearson, R., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2015) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.10 · Cited by 281
Privacy Concerns for Use of Voice Activated Personal Assistant in the Public Space
Easwara Moorthy, A., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2015) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2014.986642 · Cited by 250
Gamal Aboelmaged, M. (2010) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635571011030042 · Cited by 240
Navigating the Complexity of Generative AI Adoption in Software Engineering
Russo, D. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3652154 · Cited by 217
Is it the end of the technology acceptance model in the era of generative artificial intelligence?
Mogaji, E., Viglia, G., Srivastava, P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-08-2023-1271 · Cited by 187
Modeling Influences on Impulse Purchasing Behaviors During Online Marketing Transactions
Zhang, X., Prybutok, V. R., & Strutton, D. (2007) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679150106 · Cited by 183
Unintended effects of autonomous driving: a study on mobility preferences in the future
Pakusch, C., Stevens, G., Boden, A., & Bossauer, P. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10072404 · Cited by 182
Polites, G. L., & Karahanna, E. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.1.10 · Cited by 174
TSIKNAKIS, M., & KOUROUBALI, A. (2009) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.07.001 · Cited by 167
Park, N. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01440.x · Cited by 141
Kim, T. (., Suh, Y. K., Lee, G., & Choi, B. G. (2010) · International Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1002/jtr.787 · Cited by 139
Determinants of Consumer Intentions to Purchase Energy-Saving Household Products in Pakistan
Ali, S., Ullah, H., Akbar, M., Akhtar, W., & Zahid, H. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11051462 · Cited by 139
Lee, H.-H., Kim, J., & Fiore, A. M. (2010) · Clothing and Textiles Research Journal · doi:10.1177/0887302x09341586 · Cited by 128
Psychological factors influencing technology adoption: A case study from the oil and gas industry
Roberts, R., Flin, R., Millar, D., & Corradi, L. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102219 · Cited by 121
Variations in Article Seeking and Reading Patterns of Academics: What Makes a Difference?
Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Spencer, J., & Wu, L. (2009) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2009.02.002 · Cited by 108
Interface Characteristics, Perceived Ease of Use and Intention to Use an Online Library in Malaysia
Ramayah, T. (2006) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/0266666906065575 · Cited by 85
Creativity in Virtual Work: Effects of Demographic Differences
Martins, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2011) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496410397382 · Cited by 80
Acceptance of 5 G technology: Mediation role of Trust and Concentration
Akbari, M., Rezvani, A., Shahriari, E., Zúñiga, M. Á., & Pouladian, H. (2020) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101585 · Cited by 72
Effects and acceptance of precision education in an AI-supported smart learning environment
Hu, Y.-H. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10664-3 · Cited by 68
Awa, H. O., Eze, S. C., Urieto, J. E., & Inyang, B. J. (2011) · Journal of Systems and Information Technology · doi:10.1108/13287261111135981 · Cited by 61
Manipulating user resistance to large-scale information systems through influence tactics
Ilie, V., & Turel, O. (2020) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2019.103178 · Cited by 52
Udo, G. J., Bagchi, K. K., & Kirs, P. J. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.017 · Cited by 51
Kifle, M., Payton, F. C., Mbarika, V., & Meso, P. (2010) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2009.0008 · Cited by 51
Day, A., Barber, L. K., & Tonet, J. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior · doi:10.1017/9781108649636.022 · Cited by 50
Why are experienced users of WeChat likely to continue using the app?
Gong, X., Liu, Z., Zheng, X., & Wu, T. (2018) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-10-2017-0246 · Cited by 47
How Does AI Improve Human Decision-Making? Evidence from the AI-Powered Go Program
Choi, S., Kim, N., Kim, J., & Kang, H. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3893835 · Cited by 30
Portes, A., N’Goala, G., & Cases, A.-S. (2020) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) · doi:10.1177/2051570720973548 · Cited by 26
A stigma power perspective on digital government service avoidance
Pethig, F., Kroenung, J., & Noeltner, M. (2021) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101545 · Cited by 23
Gender differences in the antecedents of trust in mobile social networking services
Gong, X., Liu, Z., & Wu, T. (2021) · The Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2018.1497162 · Cited by 18
Chatbot-aided product purchases among Generation Z: the role of personality traits
Liu, J., & Chen, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1454197 · Cited by 10
Al-Maghrabi, T., & Dennis, C. (2010) · International Journal of Customer Relationship Marketing and Management · doi:10.4018/jcrmm.2010040102 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J.
- Venue
- Decision Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 361-391
- ISSN
- 0011-7315 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5915
- OpenAlex
- W1974108202
- Cited by
- 2,102
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 59.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.