Cited by 766Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsAutophagy in Disease and TherapyDietary Effects on Health

A Role for Autophagy in the Extension of Lifespan by Dietary Restriction in C. elegans

Open access
Hansen, Malene, Chandra, Abha, Mitic, Laura L, Onken, Brian, Driscoll, Monica, Kenyon, Cynthia·2008·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

In many organisms, dietary restriction appears to extend lifespan, at least in part, by down-regulating the nutrient-sensor TOR (Target Of Rapamycin). TOR inhibition elicits autophagy, the large-scale recycling of cytoplasmic macromolecules and organelles. In this study, we asked whether autophagy might contribute to the lifespan extension induced by dietary restriction in C. elegans. We find that dietary restriction and TOR inhibition produce an autophagic phenotype and that inhibiting genes required for autophagy prevents dietary restriction and TOR inhibition from extending lifespan. The longevity response to dietary restriction in C. elegans requires the PHA-4 transcription factor. We find that the autophagic response to dietary restriction also requires PHA-4 activity, indicating that autophagy is a transcriptionally regulated response to food limitation. In spite of the rejuvenating effect that autophagy is predicted to have on cells, our findings suggest that autophagy is not sufficient to extend lifespan. Long-lived daf-2 insulin/IGF-1 receptor mutants require both autophagy and the transcription factor DAF-16/FOXO for their longevity, but we find that autophagy takes place in the absence of DAF-16. Perhaps autophagy is not sufficient for lifespan extension because although it provides raw material for new macromolecular synthesis, DAF-16/FOXO must program the cells to recycle this raw material into cell-protective longevity proteins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.0040024

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activation of macroautophagy is a common feature of all the long-lived mutant worms, including the models for dietary restriction.

    “Activation of macroautophagy is a common feature of all the long-lived mutant worms, including the models for dietary restriction (Hansen et al., 2008; Hars et al., 2007; Melendez et al., 2003; Tóth et al., 2008).”

    From Protein Homeostasis and Aging: the importance of exquisite quality control (2011) · cites this paper as Hansen et al., 2008

    The Results and Discussion support increased autophagy in long-lived dietary-restriction eat-2 mutants. But the Discussion reports no increase in the autophagy reporter’s foci in long-lived rsks-1 mutants, contrary to the claim that activation is a feature of all long-lived mutant worms. The authors note that autophagy in other tissues remains possible. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Functional macroautophagy is necessary to attain the maximal lifespan extension mediated by mutations in the nutrient-sensor TOR, the tumor suppressor protein p53, and the lifespan prolonging effect of Sirt-1.

    “Functional macroautophagy has also proven necessary to attain the maximal lifespan extension mediated by mutations in other genes such as the nutrient-sensor TOR (Hansen et al., 2008), the tumor suppressor protein p53 (Tavernarakis et al., 2008) and even the lifespan prolonging effect of Sirt-1 (Morselli et al., 2010).”

    From Protein Homeostasis and Aging: the importance of exquisite quality control (2011) · cites this paper as Hansen et al., 2008

  • RAB7 is needed for the clearance of autophagic compartments, most likely for the fusion of amphisomes with lysosomes.

    “RAB7 is also needed for the clearance of”

    From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition). (2016) · cites this paper as [1704]

    The Results section on rab-10 reports that inhibiting RAB-10 increases autophagy, but does not address RAB7. The Introduction describes autophagosomes being degraded in lysosomes; neither it nor the passages retrieved by searching for RAB7 and amphisome–lysosome fusion establishes RAB7’s role in clearance. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Increased autophagy is necessary for lifespan extension by reduced insulin-like signaling and dietary restriction in worms.

    “In worms, increased autophagy is necessary for lifespan extension by reduced insulin-like signaling (50) and dietary restriction (51).”

    From Neural mechanisms of ageing and cognitive decline (2010) · cites this paper as [51]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hansen, M., Chandra, A., Mitic, L. L., Onken, B., Driscoll, M., & Kenyon, C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Kenyon, Cynthia
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2008-02-15
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
e24
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W1994305081
Cited by
766
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 45
FWCI
18.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Ellison Medical Foundation
  • Larry L. Hillblom Foundation
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG024882, T32AG000278)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T90DK070135)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
Keywords
autophagy, lifespan extension, dietary restriction, TOR signaling, Caenorhabditis elegans, PHA-4, DAF-16/FOXO, daf-2 mutant, longevity, nutrient sensing
MeSH terms
Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors, Animals, Autophagy, Diet, Longevity, Models, Biological, Mutation, Receptor, Insulin, Receptors, Nicotinic, Trans-Activators, Caenorhabditis elegans, Genes, Helminth, Phosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor), Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, rab GTP-Binding Proteins, Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins, Animals, Genetically Modified, Vesicular Transport Proteins, RNA Interference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review