Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,159

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Podolsky, Daniel K.·2002·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Clinical experience has suggested that Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis constitute distinct, if not discrete, entities. However, whether these conditions are fundamentally different or are part of a mechanistic continuum is a question with both conceptual and practical implications for management. This review summarizes current understanding of the mechanisms underlying the major forms of inflammatory bowel disease and discusses approaches to therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmra020831

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Podolsky, D. K.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2002-08-08
Volume
347
Issue
6
Pages
417-429
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4292198229
Cited by
3,159
References
1
FWCI
58.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.