Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,563

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender stereotypes and workplace bias

Heilman, Madeline E.·2012·Research in Organizational Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 127

  1. Abele, 2003, The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768, 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.768 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Allen, 2006, Rewarding good citizens: The relationship between citizenship behavior, gender, and organizational rewards, Journal of Applied Psychology, 36, 120, 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00006.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Allen, 1999, Parental leave of absence: Some not so family-friendly implications, Journal of Applied Psychology, 29, 166, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01380.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Amanatullah, 2010, Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women's fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others, Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 98, 256, 10.1037/a0017094 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Ames, 2004, It's the thought that counts: On perceiving how helpers decide to lend a hand, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 461, 10.1177/0146167203261890 · DOI
  6. Baltes, 2000, Reducing the effects of performance expectations on behavioral ratings, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 237, 10.1006/obhd.2000.2897 · DOI
  7. Banaji, 1996, Automatic stereotyping, Psychological Science, 7, 136, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00346.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. Banaji, 1993, Implicit stereotyping in person judgment, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 272, 10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.272 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.272 · Paper page
  9. Battle W. S. (2008). Women's inhibition of self-advocacy: Avoiding the consequences of gender deviance. Unpublished dissertation.
  10. Bauer, 2002, Reducing the effects of gender stereotypes on performance evaluations, Sex Roles, 47, 465, 10.1023/A:1021652527696 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Bowles, 2010, Status and the evaluation of workplace deviance, Psychological Science, 21, 49, 10.1177/0956797609356509 · DOI
  12. Bowles, H. R., & Babcock, L. (2012). How can women escape the compensation negotiation dilemma? Psychology of Women Quarterly, in press. · DOI
  13. Bowles, 2005, Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 951, 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.951 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Brenner, 1989, The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited, Academy of Management Journal, 32, 662, 10.2307/256439 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Brescoll, 2008, Can angry women get ahead? Gender, status conferral, and workplace emotion expression, Psychological Science, 19, 268, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02079.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. Brett, 2005, Effective delivery of workplace discipline: Do women have to be more participatory than men?, Group and Organization Management, 30, 487, 10.1177/1059601104267606 · DOI
  17. Brett, 1997, Jumping ship: Who benefits from an external labor market career strategy?, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 331, 10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.331 · DOI
  18. Brief, 2000, Just doing business: Modern racism and obedience to authority as explanations for employment discrimination, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 72, 10.1006/obhd.1999.2867 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Broverman, 1972, Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal, Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1972.tb00018.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. Budig, 2002, Male advantage and the gender composition of jobs: Who rides the glass escalator?, Social Problems, 49, 258, 10.1525/sp.2002.49.2.258 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Burgess, 1999, Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 665, 10.1037/1076-8971.5.3.665 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Cantor, 1979, Prototypicality and personality: Effects on free recall and personality impressions, Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 187, 10.1016/0092-6566(79)90030-8 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Cardy, 1986, Affect and appraisal accuracy: Liking as an integral dimension in evaluating performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 672, 10.1037/0021-9010.71.4.672 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.4.672 · Paper page
  24. Carli, 2001, Gender and social influence, Journal of Social Issues, 57, 725, 10.1111/0022-4537.00238 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Carli, 1995, Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1030, 10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1030 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1030 · Paper page
  26. Casciaro, 2005, Competent jerks, lovable fools, and the formation of social networks, Harvard Business Review, 83, 92
  27. Cejka, 1999, Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413, 10.1177/0146167299025004002 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Chaiken, 1980, Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752, 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752 · Paper page
  29. Chen, J. J. (2008). Ordinary vs. extraordinary: Differential reactions to men's and women's prosocial behavior in the workplace. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
  30. Cialdini, 1998, Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance, Vol. 2, 151
  31. Cooper, 1981, Conceptual similarity as a source of illusory halo in job performance ratings, Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 302, 10.1037/0021-9010.66.3.302 · DOI
  32. Costrich, 1975, When stereotypes hurt: Three studies of penalties for sex-role reversals, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 520, 10.1016/0022-1031(75)90003-7 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Davison, 2000, Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: A meta-analytic investigation, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 225, 10.1006/jvbe.1999.1711 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Dennis, 2004, Perceptions of men, women, and CEOs: The effects of gender identity, Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 155, 10.2224/sbp.2004.32.2.155 · DOI
  35. DeNisi, 1984, A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions, Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 33, 360, 10.1016/0030-5073(84)90029-1 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Derks, 2011, Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee?, British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 519, 10.1348/014466610X525280 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Diekman, 2000, Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171, 10.1177/0146167200262001 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Dipboye, 1984, Some neglected variables in research on discrimination in appraisals, Academy of Management Review, 10, 116, 10.5465/amr.1985.4277365 · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4277365 · Paper page
  39. Dodge, 1995, Requisite management characteristics revisited: Two decades later, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. Special Issue: Gender in the Workplace, 10, 253
  40. Dovidio, 1986, Racial stereotypes: The contents of their cognitive representations, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 22, 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90039-9 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Eagly, 2003, The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence, The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Eagly, 2003, Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men, Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569, 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Eagly, 1992, Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3, 10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3 · Paper page
  44. Eagly, 1991, Are women evaluated more favorably than men? An analysis of attitudes, beliefs, and emotions, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 203, 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00792.x · DOI · Paper page
  45. Ellemers, 2004, The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the Queen-bee syndrome?, British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 315, 10.1348/0144666042037999 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Favero, 1989, The effects of ratee prototypicality on rater observation and accuracy, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 932, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb01230.x · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb01230.x
  47. Feldman, 1988, Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 421, 10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.421 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.421 · Paper page
  48. Fiske, 1991, Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, American Psychologist, 46, 1049, 10.1037/0003-066X.46.10.1049 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.46.10.1049 · Paper page
  49. Fiske, 1990, A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation, Vol. 23, 1
  50. Fuegen, 2004, Mothers and fathers in the workplace: How gender and parental status influence judgments of job-related competence, Journal of Social Issues, 60, 737, 10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00383.x · DOI · Paper page
  51. Gaucher, 2011, Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 109, 10.1037/a0022530 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Gilbert, 1991, The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509, 10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.509 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Gill, 2004, When information does not deter stereotyping: Prescriptive stereotyping can foster bias under conditions that deter descriptive stereotyping, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 619, 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.12.001 · DOI
  54. Haddock, 1994, Preferring “housewives” to “feminists”: Categorization and the favorability of attitudes toward women, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 25, 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00295.x · DOI
  55. Haynes, M. C., & Heilman, M. E. (in press). It had to be you (not me)! Women's attributional rationalization of their contribution to successful joint work outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
  56. Heilman, 1980, The impact of situational factors on personnel decision concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26, 286, 10.1016/0030-5073(80)90074-4 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Heilman, 1983, Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model, Vol. 5
  58. Heilman, 1984, Information as a deterrent against sex discrimination: The effects of applicant sex and information type on preliminary employment decisions, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 174, 10.1016/0030-5073(84)90019-9 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Heilman, 1995, Sex stereotypes and their effects in the workplace: What we know and what we don’t know, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 3
  60. Heilman, 2001, Assuming preferential selection when the admissions policy is unknown: The effects of gender rarity, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 188, 10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.188 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.188
  61. Heilman, 1995, Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers?, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 237
  62. Heilman, 1989, Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 935, 10.1037/0021-9010.74.6.935 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.6.935 · Paper page
  63. Heilman, 1997, The affirmative action stigma of incompetence: Effects of performance information ambiguity, Academy of Management Journal, 40, 603, 10.2307/257055 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Heilman, 2005, Same behavior, different consequences: Reactions to men's and women's altruistic citizenship behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 431, 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.431 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Heilman, 2005, No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women's success in male-female teams, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 905, 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.905 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Heilman, 1990, Self-derogating consequences of sex-based preferential selection: The moderating role of initial self-confidence, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 202, 10.1016/0749-5978(90)90029-9 · DOI
  67. Heilman, 1988, The vagaries of sex bias: Conditions regulating the undervaluation, equivaluation, and overvaluation of female job applicants, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 98, 10.1016/0749-5978(88)90049-0 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Heilman, 2008, Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 189, 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.189 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Heilman, 2007, Gender stereotypes in the workplace: Obstacles to women's career progress, Vol. 24, 47
  70. Heilman, 1985, Attractiveness and corporate success: Different causal attributions for males and females, Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 379, 10.1037/0021-9010.70.2.379 · DOI
  71. Heilman, 1985, Being attractive, advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job type, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 202, 10.1016/0749-5978(85)90035-4 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Heilman, 2010, Wimpy and undeserving of respect: Penalties for men's gender-inconsistent success, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 664, 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.01.008 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Heilman, 2004, Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416, 10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Heilman, 2006, Disadvantaged by diversity? The effects of diversity goals on competence perceptions, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 206, 1291, 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00043.x · DOI
  75. Heslin, 2005, The effect of implicit person theory on performance appraisals, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 842, 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.842 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Higgins, 1987, Social cognition and social perception, Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369, 10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.002101 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Horvath, L. K. & Sczesny, S. (2011). Gender-fair language in job advertisements and hiring decisions. In S. Sczesny (Chair), Gender-fair language use from a social psychological perspective. Symposium conducted at the 16th General meeting of the European association of social psychology, Stockholm.
  78. Ilgen, 1983, Performance appraisal: A process focus, Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 141
  79. Johnson, 1983, Overlooking the incongruent: Categorization biases in the identification of political statements, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 978, 10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.978 · DOI
  80. Judge, 2012, Do nice guys – and gals – really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 390, 10.1037/a0026021 · DOI · Paper page
  81. Klimoski, 1990, Accountability forces in performance appraisal, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 194, 10.1016/0749-5978(90)90011-W · DOI · Paper page
  82. Kray, 2005, Gender stereotypes and negotiation performance: An examination of theory and research, Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 103, 10.1016/S0191-3085(04)26004-X · DOI · Paper page
  83. Kunda, 1997, Equal ratings but separate meanings: Stereotypes and the construal of traits, Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72, 720, 10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.720 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.720
  84. Locksley, 1980, Sex stereotypes and social judgment, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821, 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.821 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.821 · Paper page
  85. Lueptow, 1995, The persistence of gender stereotypes in the face of changing sex roles: Evidence contrary to the sociocultural model, Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 509, 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00072-0 · DOI
  86. Lyness, 2006, When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluation and promotions of upper-level female and male managers, Journal of, Applied Psychology, 91, 777, 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.777 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Lyness, 1999, Are women more likely to be hired or promoted into management positions?, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 158, 10.1006/jvbe.1998.1646 · DOI
  88. Macrae, 1994, Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 37, 10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.37 · DOI · Paper page
  89. Madera, 2009, Gender and letters of recommendation for academics: Agentic and communal differences, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1591, 10.1037/a0016539 · DOI · Paper page
  90. Manzoni, 1998, How bosses create their own poor performers: The set-up-to-fail syndrome, Harvard Business Review, 76, 101
  91. Martell, 1995, A methodological and substantive note on the performance-cue effect in ratings of work-group behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 191, 10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.191 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.191
  92. Martell, 1998, Sex stereotyping in the executive suite: “Much ado about something”, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 127
  93. Matschiner, 1999, Hyperfemininity and influence, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 342, 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00385.x · DOI
  94. Mero, 1995, Effects of rater accountability on the accuracy and the favorability of performance ratings, Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 524, 10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.517 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.517 · Paper page
  95. Mero, 2003, Effects of accountability on rating behavior and rater accuracy, Journal of Applied social Psychology, 33, 2493, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02777.x · DOI
  96. Moss-Racusin, 2010, When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men, Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 11, 140, 10.1037/a0018093 · DOI · Paper page
  97. Nieva, 1980, Sex effects on evaluation, Academy of Management Review, 5, 267, 10.5465/amr.1980.4288749 · doi:10.5465/amr.1980.4288749 · Paper page
  98. Norton, 2004, Casuistry and social category bias, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 817, 10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.817 · DOI · Paper page
  99. Okimoto, 2010, The price of power: Power-seeking and backlash against female politicians, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 923, 10.1177/0146167210371949 · DOI · Paper page
  100. Pazy, 2001, Sex proportion and performance evaluation among high-ranking military officers, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 689, 10.1002/job.109 · DOI
  101. Plant, 2000, Gender stereotyping of emotion, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 81, 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb01024.x · DOI · Paper page
  102. Powell, 2002, Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed?, Journal of Management, 28, 177, 10.1177/014920630202800203 · doi:10.1177/014920630202800203 · Paper page
  103. Pratto, 1991, Stereotyping based on apparently individuating information: Trait and global components of sex stereotypes under attention overload, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 26, 10.1016/0022-1031(91)90009-U · DOI · Paper page
  104. Rasinski, 1985, Another look at sex stereotypes and social judgments: An analysis of the social perceiver's use of subjective probabilities, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 317, 10.1037/0022-3514.49.2.317 · DOI
  105. Rosette, 2010, Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. Journal of, Applied Psychology, 95, 221, 10.1037/a0018204 · DOI · Paper page
  106. Rudman, 2004, Reactions to counter stereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157, 10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157 · DOI · Paper page
  107. Rudman, 1999, Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004, 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1004 · DOI · Paper page
  108. Rudman, 2001, Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women, Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743, 10.1111/0022-4537.00239 · DOI · Paper page
  109. Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (in press). Penalizing men who request a family leave: Is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma? Journal of Social Issues.
  110. Sackett, 1991, Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and White-Black differences in performance ratings, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 263, 10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.263 · DOI · Paper page
  111. Schein, 1973, The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics, Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95, 10.1037/h0037128 · DOI · Paper page
  112. Schein, 1975, Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers, Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 340, 10.1037/h0076637 · DOI · Paper page
  113. Schein, 2001, A global look at psychological barriers to women's progress in management, Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675, 10.1111/0022-4537.00235 · DOI · Paper page
  114. Schmader, 2007, A linguistic comparison of letters of recommendation for male and female chemistry and biochemistry job applicants, Sex Roles, 57, 509, 10.1007/s11199-007-9291-4 · DOI · Paper page
  115. Simonson, 1992, The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 416, 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90020-8 · DOI · Paper page
  116. Swim, 1989, Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?, Psychological Bulletin, 105, 409, 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.409 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.409 · Paper page
  117. Swim, 1996, He's skilled, she's lucky: A meta-analysis of observers’ attributions for women's and men's successes and failures, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 507, 10.1177/0146167296225008 · DOI · Paper page
  118. Tetlock, 1985, Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice, Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 297
  119. Tetlock, 1989, Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 632, 10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.632 · DOI · Paper page
  120. Tosi, 1985, The effects of the type and amount of information in sex discrimination research: A meta-analysis, Academy of Management Journal, 28, 712, 10.2307/256127 · DOI
  121. Uhlmann, 2005, Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination, Psychological Science, 16, 474, 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01559.x · DOI · Paper page
  122. Van Knippenberg, 2000, Social categorizations and stereotyping: A functional perspective, Vol. 11, 105
  123. Vecchio, 2002, Leadership and gender advantage, Leadership Quarterly, 13, 643, 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00156-X · DOI · Paper page
  124. Viswesvaran, 1996, Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557, 10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.557 · DOI · Paper page
  125. Wayne, 2003, Who is a good organizational citizen? Social perception of male and female employees who use family leave, Sex Roles, 49, 233, 10.1023/A:1024600323316 · DOI
  126. Willemsen, 2002, Gender typing of the successful manager—a stereotype reconsidered, Sex Roles, 46, 385, 10.1023/A:1020409429645 · DOI
  127. Williams, 1992, The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions, Social Problems, 39, 253, 10.2307/3096961 · doi:10.2307/3096961 · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,563

Metadata

Authors
Heilman, M. E.
Venue
Research in Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
32
Pages
113-135
ISSN
0191-3085 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
OpenAlex
W1998830154
Cited by
1,563
References
16
FWCI
57.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
The paper
Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.